2025년 6월

모의고사 분석자료
생각의 양이 차이를 만듭니다.
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

18번 글의 목적. 새로 만든 반려견 공원의 개장을 홍보하려고 분석자료

Dear Dog Owners,

My name is Lily Paxton, and I’m the town’s Pet Program Coordinator.
Lily Paxton , .

~ goal + to V; ~하려는 목적 make + 목적어 + 형용사(~friendly); friend(명사) + ly = 형용사

As part of our goal to make the community more dog‐friendly, we recently opened a

new dog park.

, .

design + 목적어 + to V; ~ 목적어를 ~ 하도록 고안(설계)하다

The park was designed to provide an enjoyable experience for both dogs and owners.
.

areas를 주어로 하는 동사 관계부사 + 완전한문장

There are big grassy areas where your dogs can run, jump, and play.
, , .

~하기위해서(목적)
We have separate spaces for small dogs and big dogs, to ensure safety.
, .

stay + 형용사; ~ 한 상태를 유지하다

You’ll also nd lots of benches and areas for resting and staying cool.
.

We hope you will have a wonderful time with your dogs in this newly opened park.
.

Regards,

Lily Paxton, Pet Program Coordinator

3
fi
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

19번 심경 변화. excited → frustrated 분석자료

Maya waited in line to check in for her ight.

Maya .

A and B를 주어로하는 동사 were

Her expectations about her European backpacking trip were really high. 첫번째 감정

look forward to N/~ing; ~하는 것을 학수고대하다(기다리다, 기대하다가 섞인 표현)

She had been looking forward to the trip for a year.
.

visit과 병렬
She couldn’t wait to visit museums in Madrid and see the Eiffel Tower at night in Paris.
Madrid Paris Eiffel Tower .

As she stood in line, she could feel (that) those experiences were nally so close.
, .

‘~에 접근하다’의 의미로 타동사; 즉, 전치사 불필요

When she approached the counter, the airline employee asked to see her passport.
, .

reached와 병렬
Maya reached into her pocket but felt nothing. 불길!!

Maya .

realized보다 앞선 상황; 즉 과거완료 적절

She realized (that) she had left her passport at home. Her plans were ruined. 두번째 감정

. .

분사구문 could~와 병렬
She was heartbroken, knowing (that) she could not board the ight and had to delay her dream trip.
, .

4
fl
fl
fi
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

20번 필자의 주장. 습관으로 만들고 싶은 행동의 편리성에 주의를 기울여야 한다. 분석자료

People often ask me, “What surprises you most about habits?”
,“ ?” .

:‘ ’
주격관계대명사 one thing을 주어로하는 동사 is
One thing [that continually astonishes me] is the degree to which we’re in uenced by sheer convenience.
[변형] What continually astonishes me ~ (O) 전치사 + 관계대명사 + 완전한문장
.[ ]

The amount를 주어로하는 동사 has

The amount [of effort, time, or decision making] [required by an action] has a huge in uence on habit
effort, time .. decision
formation. making을 수식하는 과거분사구

, , .

: be more likely to V; 완곡한 주장 표현 방식

To a truly remarkable extent, we’re more likely to do something if it’s convenient, and less likely if it’s not.
, , .

원인, 이유 For this reason + 결과 목적격관계대명사 that 생략

For this reason, we should pay close attention to the convenience of any activity [we want to make into a
pay attention to N ~에 주의를 기울이다
habit.]
, .

동명사 주어 Putting을 주어로 하는 동사 made

Putting a wastebasket [next to our front door] made mail sorting slightly more convenient, and I stopped
stop + ~ing; ~ 하는 것을 멈추다 make + 목적어 + 형용사(convenient)
procrastinating with this chore.
, .

2
명사절 접속사
Many people report that they do a much better job of staying close to distant family members now that tools
비교급강조부사; so, too, very (X) now that S+V
like group chats make it easy to stay in touch. 이제 S가 V하니까
make it(가목적어) + 형용사(easy) to V(진목적어)

* sheer: ** procrastinate:

5
fl
fl
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

20번 필자의 주장. 효과적인 의사소통을 위해 몸짓을 적절히 사용해야 한다. 내용분석

How convenience in uences habit formation

The Power of Convenience: Why We Stick to Some Habits and Not Others
: ,

People are signi cantly more likely to form habits around actions that are convenient, so making tasks
easier can drastically boost consistency.
, .

1. – :“ ?”
→ .
2. –“ .”
→ .
3. – , , .
→ .
4. =
→ “ , ” .
5. – , ‘ ’ .
→ .
6. – .
→ .
7. – .
→ .

Voca
convenient ( ):
astonish ( ):
pay close attention ( ):
sheer ( ): ,
procrastinate ( ): ,
in uence ( ):
chore ( ): ,
effort ( ):
stay in touch ( ):
decision making ( ):

. “ !” ... .
? , . ? , .
, ' ' .
“ …” , . .

6
►
►
►
►
►
►
fl
fi
fl
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

21번. 함축의미. our behaviors can also shape what we believe

분석자료

가주어 진주어 사고 행동
It is common sense that people’s inner beliefs may drive their external behavior.
.

1
If you’re attracted to a certain person, you should be more likely to socialize with that person.
, .
같은 맥락

2
If you favor a brand of toothpaste, you’re more likely to buy it.
, .

of course가 들어간 문장은 글의 논리에서 중요도가 떨어짐; 예상 가능한 반론을 미리 언급하는 내용

Of course, our internal thoughts don’t always predict our public behavior, but, overall, what we do

obviously re ects what we think.

, , , .

But beliefs and behaviors are also related in a more remarkable way.
.

명사절 접속사
같은 맥락
It turns out that the arrow is as likely to point in the reverse direction.
The arrow is as likely to point in the reverse direction (as it is to point in the
. original direction.)
비교대상이 생략; 즉, 두번째 as이하가 생략된 표현임

:
observe that ~ ; ~라고 말하다, 진술하다
As social psychologist David Myers observes, “If social psychology has taught us anything during the last 25
명사절 접속사
years, it is that we are likely not only to think ourselves into a way of acting but also to act ourselves into a
not only A but also B; A뿐만 아니라 B도; B가 중요한 정보임
way of thinking.”
David Myers ,“ 25 ,

.”

7
➡︎
fl
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

21번 내용분석

The reciprocal relationship between belief and behavior

Think Then Act? Or Act Then Think? The Two-Way Street of Human Nature
, ?

Beliefs often shape our actions, but surprisingly, our behaviors can also reshape our thoughts, showing a
two-way in uence between thinking and doing.
, .

1. –
→
2. – ,
→
3. –
→
4. – → , →
→
5. – David Myers
→
6. – ,
→

Voca
be attracted to ( ):
common sense ( ):
turn out ( ):
internal belief ( ):
act oneself into a way of thinking ( ):
external behavior ( ):
socialize ( ):
think oneself into a way of acting ( ):
favor ( ):
predict ( ):
as likely to A as to B (A B ):A B
re ect ( ):
remarkable ( ):
reverse ( ):
observe ( , ):

(Social Psychology) : , , .

“ !” ? ,“ !”
: , “ !” .
.“ …” “ ? ?”
? , .
... . .

8
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
fl
fl
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

22번 분석자료

imagine의 동명사 목적어 Imagine = 상상해 봐라

Imagine following the spirit of a silence vow into daily life. following the spirit of a silence vow = 침묵 서약의 정신을 따르는 것을
into daily life = 그것을 일상생활 속에 들여오는 것, 적용하는 것
.

spend + 시간/돈 + ~ing (saying)

Challenge yourself to spend an entire day saying only what you absolutely must say.
saying의 목적어 / say의 목적어
.

주격관계대명사
It’s been widely observed by behavioral psychology experts — and anyone who’s ever been on a rst date
명사절 접속사 tend to V; be likely to V와 같이 ‘경향성’을 나타낼때 많이 사용
— that we too often tend to treat “conversation” as a game of waiting for our own turn to speak.
treat A as B; A를 B라고 여기다
“ ” —
That S + V has been widely observed by ~
— .
It has been widely observed ~ that S + V [위 문장의 기본구조]
miss의 목적어 / is의 주어
We miss what’s being said because we’re mentally rehearsing our next utterance.
.

: idea와 동격의 명사절 접속사 opening; 기회, 틈

What if you could eliminate the idea that the next available mini silence is your next opening to express
express의 목적어 / is의 주어 아주 짧은 침묵(대화중 생기는 틈)
whatever is in your head?
?

What if you were limited to, say, fty spoken words tomorrow?
, , 50 ?

I think you’d listen quite differently.

.

You’d attend quite carefully to every word you heard.

.

to의 목적어 / to의 목적어

You’d be attuned to what you must respond to.
.

명사절 접속사
You might discover that the less you say, the more you hear. 비교급은 비교 대상 중 어느하나를 강조할 때 사용; 글에 등장하
the + 비교급 S + V, the + 비교급 S + V 면 매우 중요함; 그런데 the+ 비교급은 비교가 반복되니 글의 논
, . 리에서는 당연히 중요할 수 밖에

* vow: ** utterance: *** attune:

9
fi
-­
fi
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

22번 내용분석

Practicing mindful silence in daily life

The Fifty-Word Challenge: How Silence Can Sharpen Listening

50 :

By limiting speech and avoiding habitual talking, one can become a more attentive and mindful listener.
.

1. : .( )
2. : ‘ ’ .( )
3. : .( )
4. : , 50 .( )
5. : , .( )
6. : .( )

Voca
available ( ‘ ’ ):
vow ( ): ,
attend to ( ):
utterance ( ): ,
mentally ( ):
attune ( ): ,
mini-silence ( ):
rehearse ( ):
respond to ( ):
eliminate ( ):

Behavioral psychology ( ): .
.

, . 50 ? " ?" " , "— 4 ,

! , . ,
!" ? ?" ! . ? !

10
►
►
►
►
►
►
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

23번 주제. need to act on scientific understanding in solving problems 분석자료

be concerned with N ; N와 관련이 있다.

Science is concerned with accumulating and understanding observations of the physical world.
.

뭔가 다른 것이 있다는 것을 암시; 지금부터는 다른 그것을 찾는 것이 글을 읽는 목적

That understanding alone solves no problems.
.

to V의 부사; 목적 (to help)

조동사 + 동사원형; 주장에서 많이 사용;
‘ ’ 그중에서도 must/have to ~는 강력함 help (목적어) (to) 동사원형(solve)
Individual people have to act on that understanding [for it] to help solve problems.
for it(=that understanding); to help의 의미상 주어
.
반복
즉, 지식만으론 안되고 행동으로 옮겨야 한다는 것이 핵심!!!

명사절 접속사
For instance, science has found that regular exercise can lower your risk of heart disease.
, .

동명사 주어 vs. interested (X) vs. something(X)

Knowing this fact is interesting, but it will do nothing for your personal health unless you act on it and actually

exercise.
, .

동명사 주어
And that’s the hard part. Reading an article about exercise is easy.
. .

반복

Getting into an actual routine of regular exercise is harder.

.

In this sense, science really solves no problems at all.

, .

반복 Problems are only solved when people take the knowledge provided by science and use it.
.

+
In fact, many of humanity’s biggest problems are caused by lack of action, and not lack of knowledge.
, , .

* accumulate:

11
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

23번 내용분석

The role of action in applying scienti c knowledge

Science Doesn’t Solve Problems—People Do

,

Scienti c understanding only becomes meaningful when individuals act on it; without action, knowledge
remains ineffective.
, .

1. : .( )
2. : .( )
3. : .( )
4. : .( )
5. : .( )
6. : , .( )
6. : .( )

Voca
solve ( ):
accumulate ( ):
provided by ( ):~
concerned with (~ ):~ ,
understanding ( ):
risk ( ):
act on ( ):~
lack of action ( ):
routine ( ): ,
take the knowledge ( ):

accumulate ( ): .

, . ? !
“ ”! “ ” , “ ” … ?
. , ! , ?“ ” !

12
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
fi
fi
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

24번 제목. Open to Interpretation: Everyone Sees Reality Differently 분석자료

: and therefore (we are) accurate

We think we’re being logical, objective, and rational — and therefore accurate in our analysis, judgment, and

decisions.
— , , .

명사절 접속사 agree와 병렬

So we think that if other people are logical, objective, and rational, they will agree with us and see what we
see의 목적어
see. we see의 목적어

, .

But the opposite is the case. Every human brain is different.

= the reality is quite the opposite.; 즉, 우리와 같지가 않다.
. .

Everyone’s life experience is different. Everyone’s desires and knowledge are different.
. .

명사절 접속사; 콤마 which로 오해하지 말것

You might think you’re being realistic — that is, that your ideas match reality, but that’s impossible.
— , , .

계속적용법의 관계대명사; Vs. that(X) ~from someone else’s(소유대명사)

It’s only your interpretation of reality, which will always be different from someone else’s.
be different from + N ; N와는 다르다
, .

the fans를 주어로 하는 동사 criticize

When two nations play each other in the World Cup, the fans of each country criticize the referees for
목적격 관계대명사 criticize A for B ; A를 비난하다 B를 이유로
missing all the infractions that the other team commits.
World Cup , .

명사절 접속사
Without fail, each fan base believes that the referees are biased against their team.
, .

* infraction:

13
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

24번 내용분석

Subjective perception and the illusion of objectivity

You’re Not As Objective As You Think

Despite our belief in being rational and realistic, our perceptions are shaped by personal experience,
making true objectivity nearly impossible.
, .

1. : .( : )
2. : .( )
3. : , , .( )
4. : ‘ ’ ‘ ’ .( )
5. : .( )
6. : , .( )

Voca
infraction ( ): ,
logical ( ):
biased ( ):
objective ( ):
fan base ( ):
rational ( ):
judgment ( , ):
realistic ( ):
without fail ( ):
interpretation ( ):

infraction ( ): , .

? ! " ", " " .

.“ ” 1 ! ,
. “ , ~” “ ?” .

14
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

26번 불일치 분석자료

Edward O. Wilson was born in Birmingham, Alabama, in 1929.

Edward O. Wilson 1929 Alabama Birmingham .

he가 느끼는 감정이므로 과거분사가 적절; vs. interesting(X)

In his early childhood, he became interested in nature and spent much time in the outdoors.
became과 병렬
, .

sight를 주어로 하는 동사 led

At age seven, he was partially blinded in a shing accident; his reduced sight led Wilson to the study of ants.
lead A to B; A를 B로 이끌다
7 , ; Wilson .

He could not observe larger animals from a distance.

.

Instead, he concentrated on smaller creatures [he could study up close.]

, .

After studying evolutionary biology at the University of Alabama, Wilson transferred to Harvard University,
관계부사 + 완전한 문장
where he became a professor in 1956.
Alabama , Wilson Harvard , 1956 .

He never received a Nobel Prize — the prize didn’t recognize research in the eld of evolutionary biology.
Nobel Prize — .

‘award 명사1(~에게) + 명사2(~을) 상으로 주다’의 수동형태

However, he was awarded the Crafoord Prize in 1990.
, 1990 Crafoord Prize .

Wilson을 주어로 하는 동사 died

Wilson, known [to some] as the “modern‐day Darwin”, died at the age of 92 in Massachusetts.
be known as ~로 알려져 있다. [to some; 몇몇에게는]
“ Darwin” Wilson Massachusetts 92 .

15
fi
fi
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

29번 어법 분석자료

into의 목적어 / means의 목적어

Studies of experts provide insight into what it means to have deep and exible understanding.
.

Experts를 주어로 하는 동사 are

Experts in a particular domain are people who have deep, richly interconnected ideas about the world.
주격관계대명사
.

주격관계대명사
They are not just good thinkers or people who are exceptionally smart.
.

동사자리
Rather, experts have (having) knowledge in a speci c domain — such as chess, chemistry, or tennis — and
have와 병렬
are not generalists.
, — , , — , .

However, experts do not just know “a bunch of facts.”

, “ ” .

: 명사절 접속사
In fact, having expertise in a topic means that knowledge is organized into coherent frameworks, and the
동명사 주어(Having)
expert understands the inte -relationship between facts and can distinguish which ideas are most central.
between + 복수명사
, ,

본동사자리; vs. allowing(X) allows와 병렬

This kind of deep but organized understanding allows for greater exibility in learning and facilitates

application across multiple contexts.

.

* coherent:

16
r­
fi
fl
fl
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

29번 어법 내용분석

The nature of expert understanding and knowledge organization

More Than Smart: How Experts Think in Patterns

:

Experts possess structured, interconnected knowledge in a speci c eld, enabling exible thinking and
application across contexts.
.

1. : .( )
2. : .( )
3. : .( )
3. : , .( )
4. : , .( )
5. : .( )

Voca
framework ( ): ,
expert ( ):
interrelationship ( ):
domain ( ): ,
central ( , ): ,
interconnected ( ):
exibility ( ):
generalist ( ):
facilitate ( ):
coherent ( ):

coherent ( ): , .
framework ( ): .

? ~! “ ”? ! , ,
! ,“ …” “ ,
, !” . , !
! , , .

17
►
►
fl
►
►
►
►
fi
fi
fl
2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

30번 어휘 분석자료

;
가주어 진주어 observe와 병렬
It is natural for people to observe happenings and then seek explanations for why those happenings
자동사로 수동태 (X)
occurred.
.

전치사 + 명사
But sometimes the reasoning is wrong because of one or more misconceptions.
sometimes의 논리
. - 일반적인 상황 경황을 설명한 뒤 sometimes가 등장하면 앞쪽 논리와 이후 논리
의 대조 관계를 이루는 경우가 매우 많이 발생함. 그래서 but과도 매우 잘 어울림. 실
; 제 연결어를 삭제하는 경우도 있으며 이런 경우에도 대조 관계를 파악할 수 있어야 함.
one을 주어로 하는 동사 is 관계부사 + 완전한문장 명사절 접속사
One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims that there is a causal relationship between

two things merely because they occur together.

[변형] because of co-occurrence
, .

명사절 접속사 관계부사 + 완전한문장

For example, in the 1950s it was found that crime rates were the highest in neighborhoods where immigrants

were most numerous.

, 1950 .

Some people used this “co‐occurrence” to argue that immigrants were a cause of crime.
“ ” .

명사절 접속사 ‘force + 목적어 + to V’의 수동형태 관계부사 + 완전한문장

But a careful analysis of this situation revealed that immigrants were forced to live in neighborhoods where
vs. living (X)
crime rates were already high (low); they could not afford more expensive housing in safer neighborhoods.
;

commit + 목적어; ~을 저지르다

Immigrants themselves committed very few of the crimes.
very few; a very small number or quantity
.

Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby construct a

faulty belief.
, .

18
 2025년 고1 6월 모의고사 기가스터디

30번 어휘 내용분석

Ecological fallacy and the dangers of misinterpreting correlation

When Correlation Lies: The Ecological Fallacy Explained

:

Assuming causation from co-occurrence can lead to the ecological fallacy, where awed reasoning
results in harmful misbeliefs.
.

1. : .( )
2. : .( )
3. : .( )
4. : 1950 .( )
5. : .( )
6. : .( )

Voca
afford ( ):
reasoning ( ):
careful analysis ( ):
misconception ( ):
misinterpret ( ):
ecological fallacy ( ):
faulty belief ( ):
causal relationship ( ):
claim ( ):
co-occurrence ( ):

Ecological fallacy ( ): . :"

→ " .

“ ” “ ~ !” . ? ,
! . , . “
→ !” ! ! - !
.“ → !” !

19
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
fl