0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views32 pages

8625 Assig 02

Uploaded by

Mazhar Hassnain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views32 pages

8625 Assig 02

Uploaded by

Mazhar Hassnain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32

Name : Mazhar Hassnain

Registration No: 0000871766

Semester: 2nd

Program: B.ed 1.5 year

Course Name: Higher


Education

Course Code: 8625

Assignment No: 02

1
Q. 1 Explain with a specific
example the relationship of
higher education with the
employment situation in
developing countries.
The relationship between higher education and the
employment situation in developing countries is
complex and often characterized by a paradox: while
higher education is seen as a key driver of economic
development and individual upward mobility, many
developing countries face challenges of graduate
unemployment or underemployment.
The Ideal Relationship (Human Capital Theory):
Traditionally, human capital theory posits that higher
education equips individuals with specialized
knowledge, critical thinking skills, and problem-
solving abilities, making them more productive and
competitive in the labor market. This increased human
capital is expected to lead to higher wages, better job
opportunities, and overall economic growth. For
developing countries, investing in higher education is
crucial for building a skilled workforce capable of
driving innovation, industrialization, and
competitiveness in the global economy. Graduates are

2
expected to fill roles in emerging sectors, lead
entrepreneurial ventures, and contribute to research
and development.
Challenges and Realities in Developing Countries:
However, several factors often distort this
ideal
relationship in developing contexts:
1. Mismatch between Skills and Market Needs:

Higher education institutions may not adequately


align their curricula with the demands of the labor
market. Graduates might possess theoretical
knowledge but lack practical skills or experience
relevant to available jobs.
2. Limited Job Creation: Even with a growing pool of

educated individuals, the pace of job creation in


developing economies might not keep up, leading
to a surplus of graduates vying for limited
positions.
3. Informal Economy Dominance: A significant

portion of the workforce in developing countries is


often employed in the informal sector, where
formal degrees may hold less direct value or where
the jobs available do not require higher education.
4. Brain Drain: Highly skilled graduates may seek

better opportunities abroad due to limited


prospects or lower wages in their home countries,
leading to a loss of valuable human capital.

3
5.Quality Concerns: The quality of higher education
itself can be an issue, with some institutions
producing graduates who are not adequately
prepared for professional roles.
Specific Example: The "Educated Unemployed" in
a
South Asian Country (e.g., Pakistan or India)
Consider a developing country in South Asia, like
Pakistan. Over the past few decades, there has been a
significant expansion in the number of universities
and higher education enrollments. This expansion
was driven by the belief that a larger pool of graduates
would fuel economic growth and address poverty.
Scenario:
A young person, let's call him Ahmed, from a middle-
class family, pursues a Bachelor's degree in a
conventional field like Commerce from a public
university in Pakistan. His parents, like many others,
view a university degree as the surest path to a stable,
respectable job.
The Ideal vs. Reality for Ahmed:
● Ideal: Ahmed, with his B.Com, should ideally find a
job as an accountant, financial analyst, or in a
related business role in a formal sector company.
● Reality: Upon graduation, Ahmed faces immense
competition. The market is saturated with B.Com

4
graduates. Many companies prefer candidates with
professional certifications (e.g., ACCA, CA) or
specialized IT skills, which were not a core part of
Ahmed's traditional university curriculum.
Furthermore, the local economy might not be
generating enough new, high-value jobs in the
formal sector to absorb all the graduates.
Outcomes for Ahmed:
1. Underemployment: Ahmed might end up taking a
job that does not require his degree, such as a
sales assistant in a retail store, or an
administrative role with low pay, simply to earn a
living. He is employed, but his education is not
fully utilized.
2. Protracted Job Search/Unemployment: He might
spend months or even years searching for a
relevant job, becoming part of the "educated
unemployed." This leads to frustration, economic
strain on his family, and a sense of disillusionment
with the value of his education.
3. Pursuit of Further (Often Unaligned) Education: To
improve his chances, Ahmed might pursue a
Master's degree, further delaying his entry into the
workforce and accumulating educational debt,
without a guarantee of a better job if the
underlying market mismatch persists.
4. Migration: Seeing limited opportunities at home,
Ahmed might consider migrating to another
5
country where his skills, even if generic, might be
more valued or where the economy is more robust.
5. Entrepreneurship (often out of necessity): Some
graduates, like Ahmed, might turn to
entrepreneurship, not necessarily out of choice or
with a well-developed business plan, but because
formal employment is elusive. This can be
challenging in an environment with limited access
to capital and support.
Conclusion of the Example:
This example illustrates that in Pakistan, as in many
developing countries, the expansion of higher
education has not always been accompanied by a
corresponding growth in relevant, quality employment
opportunities. The disjuncture between the skills
imparted by the education system and the skills
demanded by the labor market, coupled with
insufficient formal sector job creation, leads to the
phenomenon of educated unemployment or
underemployment. This highlights the need for policy
interventions that focus on improving the quality and
relevance of higher education, fostering
entrepreneurship, and promoting economic
diversification to create more high-value jobs.

6
Q. 2 Elaborate on the meanings
of assessment, evaluation and
appraisal in higher education.
Highlight the significance of
assessment at this level.
These three terms are often used interchangeably, but
they have distinct meanings and purposes in higher
education.
Meanings of Assessment, Evaluation, and Appraisal:
1. Assessment:
● Meaning: Assessment in higher education is the
systematic process of collecting, reviewing, and
using information about the learning of students to
improve their learning. It is primarily formative in
nature, focusing on ongoing feedback and
improvement. It asks: "What are students
learning?" and "How can we help them learn
better?"
● Focus: Student learning, understanding, skills, and
progress. It can be for learning (formative,
providing feedback to improve) or of learning
(summative, measuring achievement at the end).

7
● Methods: Quizzes, assignments, presentations,
discussions, projects, portfolios, peer reviews,
self-assessments, exams.
● Purpose: To diagnose learning needs, provide
feedback to students and instructors, guide
teaching strategies, and monitor student progress
toward learning outcomes.
2. Evaluation:
● Meaning: Evaluation in higher education is a
broader, more judgmental process that involves
making a determination of worth, merit, or value
regarding a program, course, institution, or even a
student's overall performance. It typically asks:
"How good is this program/course/student
performance?" or "Did we achieve our
objectives?"
● Focus: Overall quality, effectiveness, efficiency,
and impact of educational programs, institutions,
policies, or individual performance against
predetermined standards or criteria. It is often
summative.
● Methods: Accreditation reviews, program reviews,
course evaluations by students, instructor
performance reviews, graduation rates, alumni
surveys, institutional effectiveness studies, final
grades in a course.

8
● Purpose: To make decisions about continuation,
improvement, resource allocation, accountability,
and ultimately, to certify achievement or quality.
3. Appraisal:
● Meaning: Appraisal in higher education typically
refers to the formal process of reviewing the
performance and professional development of
staff (faculty, administrators, and support staff). It
is a management tool focused on individual
performance within an organizational context.
● Focus: Individual performance, professional
growth, goal setting, development needs, and
alignment with institutional objectives.
● Methods: Annual performance reviews, peer
reviews, 360-degree feedback, setting performance
objectives, identifying training needs, discussing
career progression.
● Purpose: To enhance individual effectiveness,
promote professional growth, recognize
achievements, address performance issues,
inform promotion and tenure decisions, and
ensure the overall quality of human resources
within the institution.
Significance of Assessment at this Level:
Assessment is profoundly significant in higher
education for several crucial
reasons:
9
1. Drives Student Learning: Assessment
fundamentally shapes what and how students
learn. When assessments are well-designed and
aligned with learning outcomes, they incentivize
students to engage deeply with the material,
develop critical thinking skills, and apply their
knowledge. Feedback from formative assessments
guides students in identifying areas for
improvement and taking ownership of their
learning.
2. Informs and Improves Teaching: For instructors,

assessment provides invaluable feedback on the


effectiveness of their teaching methods and
curriculum design. By analyzing assessment
results, faculty can identify areas where students
are struggling, adjust their pedagogical
approaches, clarify content, or refine assignments
to better support learning.
3. Ensures Accountability and Quality Assurance:

Assessment provides evidence of whether


students are achieving the intended learning
outcomes of a course or program. This data is
essential for internal quality assurance processes,
accreditation, and demonstrating accountability to
stakeholders (students, parents, employers,
government). It helps institutions ensure that they
are delivering on their educational promises.
4. Facilitates Student Progression and Certification:
Summative assessments, such as final exams and
10
major projects, are critical for determining if
students have met the necessary standards for
course completion, progression to higher levels,
and ultimately, graduation and certification. This
process ensures that graduates possess the
required competencies for their chosen fields.
5. Promotes Metacognition and Self-Regulation:
Effective assessment practices encourage
students to reflect on their own learning
processes, identify their strengths and
weaknesses, and develop strategies for self-
improvement. This fosters metacognition and self-
regulated learning, essential skills for lifelong
learning.
6. Enhances Program Effectiveness: Aggregated
assessment data across courses and programs
can reveal strengths and weaknesses in the
curriculum as a whole. This informs program
review and revision, ensuring that programs
remain relevant, coherent, and effective in
preparing graduates for their future roles.
7. Supports Continuous Improvement Culture: A
robust assessment system fosters a culture of
continuous improvement within the institution. By
regularly collecting and analyzing data on student
learning, institutions can make informed decisions
to enhance teaching, curriculum, student support
services, and overall educational quality.

11
8. In essence, assessment is the engine of learning
and improvement in higher education, providing
the necessary data and feedback loops for
students to learn, instructors to teach effectively,
and institutions to maintain and enhance their
quality.

Q. 3 Explain the concept of


wastage in higher education.
What measures can be taken to
minimise wastage in education?
Concept of Wastage in Higher Education:
Wastage in higher education refers to the inefficient
utilization of resources (human, financial, and
physical) within the educational system, primarily due
to students not completing their studies within the
stipulated time, or at all. It represents a loss of
investment for individuals, families, and the state, as
well as a loss of potential human capital for national
development.
The two main forms of wastage are:
1. Dropout (Attrition): This occurs when students
discontinue their studies before completing their
degree or program. Reasons can be varied,

12
including academic difficulties, financial
constraints, personal problems, lack of interest,
ill-health, family responsibilities, or finding
employment before graduation. From an
institutional perspective, it represents lost tuition
fees (for private institutions), unfulfilled capacity,
and resources invested in a student who does not
complete. For the individual, it means an
incomplete qualification, potentially wasted time
and money, and diminished future prospects.
2. Repetition (Prolonged Duration of Study): This

refers to students taking longer than the


prescribed duration to complete their studies,
often due to failing courses and having to repeat
them, or taking a reduced course load. This leads
to inefficient use of resources such as classroom
space, faculty time, and financial aid. For the
student, it means additional tuition costs (if
applicable), delayed entry into the workforce, and
potential demotivation.
Causes of Wastage: Wastage is a multifaceted
problem with causes stemming
from:
● Student Factors: Inadequate academic

preparation, lack of motivation, poor study habits,


financial difficulties, health issues, personal/family
problems.

13
● Institutional Factors: Ineffective teaching methods,
insufficient academic support, rigid curriculum,
lack of career counseling, inadequate
infrastructure, large class sizes, poor faculty-
student ratio, discriminatory practices.
● Socio-economic Factors: Poverty, pressure to
earn, societal expectations, gender discrimination,
rural-urban divide, irrelevant curriculum to market
needs.
● Systemic Factors: Inflexible policies, inadequate
funding, lack of quality assurance mechanisms,
weak admission criteria.
Measures to Minimise Wastage in Education:
Minimizing wastage requires a comprehensive
approach addressing the various contributing factors.
Here are several key measures:
1. Strengthening Pre-University Education:
○ Improved Quality of Feeder Institutions:

Ensuring students arrive at higher education


with a solid academic foundation reduces the
likelihood of academic failure and dropout.
○ Effective Guidance and Counseling: Providing

robust career counseling at the secondary


level can help students make informed choices
about higher education programs that align
with their interests and aptitudes, reducing
mismatches and subsequent dropouts.

14
2. Enhancing Student Support Services:
○ Academic Support: Offering tutoring, remedial

classes, writing centers, and academic


advising to help students overcome academic
difficulties.
○ Financial Aid and Scholarships: Providing need-

based and merit-based financial assistance to


alleviate financial burdens, a major cause of
dropout.
0 Personal and Psychological Counseling:

Addressing mental health issues, stress, and


personal problems that can impact academic
performance and lead to withdrawal.
○ Mentorship Programs: Pairing new students

with senior students or faculty members to


provide guidance and support.
3. Improving Teaching and Learning Methodologies:
0 Student-Centered Pedagogy: Shifting from

traditional lecture-based teaching to more


interactive and engaging methods that foster
critical thinking and problem-solving.
○ Faculty Development: Providing training for

faculty on effective teaching strategies,


assessment techniques, and student
engagement.
○ Early Warning Systems: Implementing systems

to identify at-risk students early and provide


timely interventions.
4. Curriculum Relevance and Flexibility:
15
0 Industry-Academia Linkages: Aligning
curricula with the demands of the labor market
to enhance employability and reduce
disinterest.
○ Flexible Learning Pathways: Offering options for

part-time study, online courses, and credit


transfer mechanisms to accommodate diverse
student needs and circumstances.
○ Modular Course Design: Breaking down large

courses into smaller, manageable modules to


allow students to progress at their own pace
and potentially re-attempt failed modules
without repeating an entire year.
5. Robust Admission and Retention Policies:
0 Fair and Transparent Admissions: Ensuring

admission criteria accurately reflect student


preparedness and potential, rather than just
rote memorization.
○ Proactive Retention Strategies: Implementing

systematic approaches to monitor student


progress and intervene when issues arise,
rather than waiting for students to drop out.
6. Infrastructure and Resources:
0 Adequate Facilities: Ensuring sufficient

classrooms, labs, libraries, and technology to


support quality learning.
○ Reasonable Class Sizes: Maintaining

manageable class sizes to allow for


individualized attention from faculty.
16
7. Monitoring and Evaluation:
0 Data Collection and Analysis: Systematically

collecting data on dropout rates, repetition


rates, and student progression to identify
trends and areas for intervention.
○ Regular Program Reviews: Conducting periodic

reviews of academic programs to ensure their


quality, relevance, and effectiveness in
retaining students.
○ By implementing a combination of these

measures, higher education institutions and


policymakers can significantly reduce wastage,
leading to a more efficient and effective
educational system that benefits both
individuals and society.

Q. 4 Critically discuss Quality


and Access as the two problems
in higher education and indicate
possible measures to solve
these problems in Pakistan.
In many developing countries, including Pakistan,
higher education grapples with a fundamental
dilemma: the tension between expanding access and
ensuring quality. Often, efforts to increase one come

17
at the expense of the other, leading to significant
challenges.
Critical Discussion of Quality and Access as
Problems
:
1. Access as a Problem:
● Meaning: Access refers to the availability and
inclusivity of higher education opportunities for all
eligible individuals, regardless of their socio-
economic background, geographic location,
gender, or disability.
● The Problem:
0 Limited Capacity: Despite growth, the number

of quality higher education institutions and


available seats often cannot accommodate the
large and growing youth population, especially
in a country like Pakistan with a significant
demographic dividend.
○ Geographic Disparity: Access is often

concentrated in major urban centers, leaving


students from rural or remote areas with
limited options or requiring them to relocate,
which presents financial and social challenges.
○ Socio-Economic Barriers: The cost of higher

education (tuition, living expenses, books) can


be prohibitive for students from low-income
families, even in public universities where fees

18
are relatively lower. This exacerbates
inequality.
○ Gender Disparity: While female enrollment has

increased, cultural norms, safety concerns,


and lack of female-friendly facilities in some
regions can still limit access for women,
particularly in certain fields of study.
○ Quality vs. Access Trade-off: Rapid expansion

of access without commensurate investment in


infrastructure, faculty, and resources often
leads to a dilution of quality. Many new
institutions may lack proper facilities or
qualified staff, offering a degree that holds
limited value.
2. Quality as a Problem:
● Meaning: Quality in higher education refers to the
excellence of the educational experience,
including the relevance of the curriculum, the
competence of faculty, the adequacy of
infrastructure and resources, the effectiveness of
teaching and learning processes, and the ultimate
outcomes (e.g., graduate employability, research
output).
● The Problem:
○ Faculty Shortage and Quality: A significant

challenge is the scarcity of highly qualified and


experienced faculty, particularly those with
PhDs or industry experience. Existing faculty
19
may lack continuous professional development
opportunities, and incentives for research are
often weak.
○ Outdated Curricula: Many curricula are not

regularly updated to reflect global


advancements, industry demands, or emerging
fields, leading to graduates lacking relevant
skills.
○ Inadequate Infrastructure and Resources:

Many institutions suffer from a lack of


well-equipped labs, modern libraries, advanced
IT infrastructure, and research facilities.
○ Rote Learning and Assessment: A continued

emphasis on rote learning and traditional


examinations discourages critical thinking,
creativity, and practical skill development.
○ Limited Research Output: There's often

insufficient focus on impactful research, which


is crucial for knowledge creation, innovation,
and improving teaching quality.
○ Lack of Industry Linkages: Weak connections

between academia and industry mean that


academic programs may not adequately
prepare students for the realities of the
professional world.
○ Accreditation and Governance Issues: Weak

regulatory frameworks or inconsistent


application of quality assurance standards can
allow substandard institutions to operate.
20
Possible Measures to Solve These Problems
in
Pakistan
:
Addressing these intertwined problems in Pakistan
requires a multi-pronged, sustained, and strategic
approach:
Measures for Enhancing Access:
1.Diversified Delivery Models:
○ Expand Online and Distance Learning: Invest

heavily in high-quality online learning platforms


and distance education programs to reach
students in remote areas and those who cannot
attend traditional universities. Ensure quality
control for these programs.
0 Hybrid Models: Implement blended learning

approaches that combine online and in-person


instruction, increasing flexibility.
2. Increased and Targeted Funding:

0 Enhanced Public Investment: Increase the

overall budget allocation for higher education. ○


Need-Based Scholarships and Loans:
Significantly expand scholarship and interest-
free loan programs, particularly for students
from low-income backgrounds, rural areas, and
marginalized communities.

21
○ Public-Private Partnerships: Encourage private
sector investment in higher education through
tax incentives and collaborative ventures,
ensuring regulatory oversight to maintain
quality.
3. Expansion of Community Colleges/Associate
Degree Programs:
0 Develop and strengthen a network of

community colleges or institutions offering


two-year associate degrees focused on
vocational and technical skills directly linked to
local industry needs. This provides an
alternative pathway to higher education and
marketable skills.
4. Affirmative Action and Outreach:
○ Implement targeted outreach programs and,

where appropriate, affirmative action policies


for underrepresented groups (e.g., women in
STEM fields, students from Balochistan or
FATA) to ensure equitable representation.
5. Improved Transport and Accommodation:
○ Invest in better public transport options to

university campuses and provide affordable


hostel facilities for students from distant areas,
especially for female students.
Measures for Enhancing Quality:
1. Faculty Development and Incentives:

22
○ Mandatory Professional Development: Establish
continuous professional development
programs for faculty in pedagogy, research
methodologies, and emerging fields.
○ Competitive Salaries and Research Grants:

Offer attractive salaries and research grants to


retain and attract highly qualified faculty,
including those with international experience.
○ Performance-Based Promotions: Link faculty

promotions and tenure to teaching


effectiveness, research output, and community
engagement.
2. Curriculum Reform and Industry Linkages:
○ Regular Curriculum Review: Mandate periodic

and comprehensive review of curricula


involving industry experts, alumni, and
employers to ensure relevance and alignment
with market demands.
0 Internships and Apprenticeships: Make

mandatory internships and practical training


components for all degree programs, fostering
stronger ties with industry.
○ Skill-Based Education: Emphasize the

development of 21st-century skills such as


critical thinking, problem-solving, digital
literacy, and communication across all
disciplines.
3. Investment in Infrastructure and Technology:

23
0 Modern Labs and Libraries: Secure funding for
upgrading laboratory equipment, establishing
digital libraries, and ensuring access to
cutting-edge technology.
○ Learning Management Systems (LMS):

Implement and effectively utilize robust LMS


for blended learning, resource sharing, and
online assessments.
4. Strengthening Research and Innovation:
0 Increased Research Funding: Allocate a

significant portion of the higher education


budget to competitive research grants and
establish research centers of excellence.
○ Promote Interdisciplinary Research: Encourage

collaboration between different departments


and institutions, and with industry, to foster
innovative research.
○ Protect Academic Freedom: Create an

environment that fosters intellectual inquiry


and critical thinking.
5. Robust Quality Assurance Mechanisms:
0 Empower Higher Education Commission

(HEC): Strengthen the HEC's role in setting and


enforcing quality standards, accreditation, and
monitoring.
○ Internal Quality Enhancement Cells (IQECs):

Require every university to establish effective


IQECs responsible for continuous self-
assessment and improvement.
24
○ Transparent Accreditation and Ranking:
Implement clear, transparent, and merit-based
accreditation and ranking systems for higher
education institutions.
6. Improved Governance and Management:
0 Autonomy and Accountability: Grant greater

academic and administrative autonomy to


universities while holding them accountable for
performance and quality outcomes.
○ Merit-Based Appointments: Ensure that

leadership positions (e.g., Vice Chancellors)


are appointed purely on merit and academic
leadership.
○ By addressing both quality and access

simultaneously through strategic reforms,


Pakistan can transform its higher education
landscape to produce a skilled, innovative, and
ethically grounded workforce capable of
contributing significantly to national
development.

Q. 5 How does continuing


education play a significant role
for society and individuals'
development. Explain the status

25
of continuing education in
Pakistan.
How Continuing Education Plays a Significant Role for
Society and Individual
Development:
Continuing Education (CE), often synonymous with
lifelong learning, refers to all learning activities
undertaken throughout life with the aim of improving
knowledge, skills, and competencies, within a
personal, civic, social, or employment-related
perspective. It extends beyond formal initial schooling
and is crucial for adaptation and progress in a rapidly
changing world.
Role for Individual Development:
1. Career Advancement and Employability: In today's
dynamic job market, skills quickly become
obsolete. CE allows individuals to update existing
skills, acquire new ones, and gain specialized
knowledge, making them more competitive,
adaptable, and attractive to employers. This leads
to promotions, new job opportunities, and higher
earning potential.
2. Personal Growth and Enrichment: CE is not solely
about professional development. It enables
individuals to explore new interests, develop
critical thinking, enhance creativity, and expand
26
their worldview. This fosters intellectual curiosity,
self-confidence, and a more fulfilling personal life.
3. Adaptation to Change: The world is constantly
evolving due to technological advancements,
globalization, and societal shifts. CE empowers
individuals to navigate these changes effectively,
both professionally and personally, by providing
them with the tools and knowledge to adapt.
4. Increased Resilience: By continuously learning,
individuals develop a growth mindset and become
more resilient in the face of career challenges,
economic downturns, or personal setbacks. They
are better equipped to reskill or pivot when
necessary.
5. Improved Quality of Life: Enhanced skills and
knowledge can lead to better health outcomes,
improved financial literacy, more informed
decision-making, and greater civic engagement, all
contributing to an improved quality of life.
Role for Society Development:
1. Economic Growth and Competitiveness: A skilled
and adaptable workforce is a cornerstone of a
robust economy. CE fuels innovation, productivity,
and competitiveness at the national level by
ensuring that the labor force possesses the skills
required for emerging industries and technological
advancements.

27
2. Social Cohesion and Inclusivity: CE can bridge
social divides by providing opportunities for
marginalized groups to acquire skills and
knowledge, leading to greater social mobility and
reduced inequality. It promotes a more informed
and engaged citizenry, fostering democratic
participation and social harmony.
3. Addressing Societal Challenges: Complex societal
challenges like climate change, public health
crises, and technological disruption require
continuous learning and knowledge creation. CE
supports the development of expertise needed to
address these issues effectively.
4. Innovation and Research: CE contributes to a
culture of continuous inquiry and learning, which
is essential for fostering innovation and research.
A well-educated populace is more likely to engage
in creative problem-solving and contribute to
scientific and technological breakthroughs.
5. Human Capital Development: From a national
perspective, CE maximizes the return on
investment in initial education by ensuring that
human capital remains relevant and productive
throughout individuals' working lives. It prevents
the depreciation of human capital.
6. Lifelong Learning Culture: By promoting CE,
society encourages a culture where learning is
seen as a continuous process, not confined to

28
formal schooling, leading to a more knowledgeable
and adaptive population.
Status of Continuing Education in Pakistan:
The status of continuing education in Pakistan is
developing but faces significant challenges, despite
its immense importance for a country with a large
youth population and a rapidly evolving global
landscape.
Positive Developments and Initiatives:
1. Growth of Online Learning: The rise of online
learning platforms (both local and international like
Coursera, edX) has significantly democratized
access to CE. Many Pakistani individuals are
leveraging these platforms for skill enhancement,
professional development, and even degree
programs. This trend has accelerated, particularly
after the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. HEC Initiatives: The Higher Education Commission
(HEC) of Pakistan periodically launches initiatives
and frameworks to promote lifelong learning,
faculty development, and skill-based training. They
encourage universities to offer short courses,
diplomas, and executive education programs.
3. Vocational and Technical Training: Organizations
like TEVTA (Technical Education & Vocational
Training Authority) and other provincial bodies
offer various short courses and diplomas aimed at
29
equipping individuals with practical skills for
specific industries, which can be considered a
form of CE.
4. Private Sector Participation: A growing number of
private training institutes, industry associations,
and professional bodies offer specialized courses
and certifications in areas like IT, digital marketing,
project management, and finance to cater to
industry demands.
5. Corporate Training: Larger corporations often have
internal training programs or sponsor their
employees for external courses to upgrade their
skills and stay competitive.
Challenges and Limitations:
1. Lack of Formal Structure and Policy: There isn't a
comprehensive national policy or a well-integrated
formal framework for continuing education across
all sectors. CE often remains fragmented and
informal.
2. Limited Awareness and Value Recognition: Many
individuals and even employers in Pakistan do not
fully recognize the critical importance and value of
continuous learning beyond formal degrees. A
degree-centric mindset still prevails.
3. Quality and Accreditation Issues: The quality of CE
programs can vary widely. There is a need for
robust accreditation and quality assurance

30
mechanisms for non-degree, short-term courses to
ensure their credibility and market value.
4. Accessibility and Affordability: While online
learning helps, access to quality CE can still be
limited by internet penetration, digital literacy, and
the cost of specialized courses, especially for
individuals from lower socio-economic strata or
rural areas.
5. Industry-Academia Disconnect: Despite some
efforts, the linkage between CE providers
(universities, institutes) and industry needs is
often weak, leading to programs that may not fully
align with market demands.
6. Lack of Incentives: There are often insufficient
incentives for individuals (e.g., tax breaks,
employer subsidies) or institutions to actively
engage in or provide CE.
7. Focus on Traditional Degrees: The primary focus
of the education system and societal aspirations
often remains on obtaining traditional degrees,
overlooking the importance of ongoing skill
development.
8. Limited Research and Data: There is a scarcity of
comprehensive data and research on the
landscape, effectiveness, and impact of continuing
education in Pakistan, making it difficult to
formulate evidence-based policies.
Conclusion :

31
In conclusion, while Pakistan is seeing an increased
awareness and some initiatives in continuing
education, it still has a long way to go to establish a
robust, accessible, and high-quality system that can
truly empower its citizens for lifelong learning and
contribute optimally to national development. This
requires sustained policy commitment, increased
investment, stronger industry linkages, and a shift in
societal mindset towards valuing continuous skill
development.

32

You might also like