GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

REPORT FOR OHTL

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 3 OF 30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW ··············································································5

2.0 PURPOSE OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ·········································6

3.0 CODES AND STANDARDS ········································································6

3.1 Code and Standards ··················································································6
3.2 Abbreviate ·······························································································8

4.0 METHODOLOGY ·····················································································8

4.1 Stage of Investigation ················································································8
4.2 Methodology ····························································································9
4.3 Workload ·······························································································11

5.0 SITE CONDITIONS ··················································································12

5.1 Terrain and Landform of Site ······································································12
5.2 Natural Climate························································································12

6.0 SITE CONDITIONS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ···········14

6.1 Regional Geology ····················································································14
6.2 Stratigraphy ····························································································17
6.3 Hydrogeology ··························································································17

7.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SUBSOIL PROPERTY INDEXS ·························18

7.1 In-situ Test ·····························································································18
7.2 Physical and Mechanical Test ·····································································18

8.0 CORROSION EVALUATION OF SUBSOIL AND GROUNDWATER ···················18

8.1 Corrosion Evaluation of Subsoil ···································································18
8.2 Corrosion Evaluation of Groundwater ···························································23

9.0 SEISMIC EFFECTIVE EVALUATION ···························································25

9.1 Seismic Hazard Distribution ········································································25
9.2 Site Classification·····················································································25
9.3 Recommendation for Seismic Parameter ·······················································25
9.4 Liquefaction Analysis ················································································28
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 4 OF 30

10.0 ADVERSE GEOLOGICAL ACTION AND POOR SUBSOIL CONDITIONS ···········28

11.0 EVALUATION OF SUBSOIL AND FOUNDATION ··········································29

11.1 Field Stability and Suitability ·······································································29
11.2 Bearing Capacity and Modulus of Subsoil ······················································29
11.3 Foundation Recommendations ····································································30

12.0 CONCULSION AND RECOMMENDATION ···················································30

APPENDIX-A LIST OF INVESTIGATION BOREHOLES

APPENDIX-B BOREHOLE LAYOUT, ENGINEERING PROFILE AND LOGS
APPENDIX-C IN-SITU TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX-D LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 5 OF 30

1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW

The Iraq Petroleum Ministry has awarded an Exploration, Development and Production
Service Contract (EDPSC) to a consortium led by Kuwait Energy, subsidiary of United
Energy Group Limited, ("COMPANY") as the Operator of the field, for the development
of the Block-9 Field, and COMPANY has awarded the FEED and relevant technical
services work to CPE.
The Block-9 Field is situated in the southern part of Iraq, in the Basra Governorate,
approximately 50 km North of Basra City, and extends north and east to the International
border with the Islamic Republic of Iran. The field is approximately 36km long and 24km
wide, covering an area of approximately 864 km2.
A map of the area showing the Block-9 Field is as given in Figure 1.1.

Figure 1.1 Location of Block 9 Oil Field

The vision for the Block-9 Field and Sindbad Field Development is for a 300 kbopd crude
oil production facility to be planned in a phased manner, producing marketable crude oil,
sales gas, and LPG products.
The project scope includes but not limited to the following:
1) Central Processing Facility (CPF);
2) Gas Processing Plant (GPP);
3) Field Surface Facility (FSF), including Well-pads Facility and Gathering System;
4) Export Pipelines for Dry Gas and LPG;
5) Power Plant (PP) and Over-head Transmission Line (OHTL);
6) Source Water Plant (SWP);
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 6 OF 30

7) Infrastructure including mainly Warehouse, Firefighting Station, Security Facility,

Base Camp and the like;
8) Road;
9) Oilfield communications and control systems;
10) Other works Company requires.
The proposed OHTL will connect the OGM1&2&3, Base camp, CPF, SWP and transmit
power from CPF to these facilities. The OHTL is about 51.5km in length. A map of the
area showing OHTL is as given in Figure 1.1, more information please refer to borehole
layout which is shown on the Appendix-C.

2.0 PURPOSE OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

The purpose of the subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering evaluation was
to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical design
recommendations for foundation design, as well as recommendations for site
preparation and earthwork related to these design aspects.
The main work as follows had been carried out:
 To collect the data including relevant documents of the engineering, information
about engineering geological and geotechnical engineering, and topographical
map covering the site.
 To ascertain preliminarily the geological configuration, stratum structure,
geotechnical engineering properties and condition of occurrence of underground
water.
 To find out the origin, distribution, scale and development trend about the
adverse geological actions and to assess the stability of the site.
 To preliminarily ascertain the corrosivity of subsoil and groundwater to building
materials.
 To assess the stability and seismic effect for the proposed site.
 Provide geotechnical engineering constructive measures and recommendations.
 Investigate the geomorphology unit, geological structure, stratum lithology,
stratum structure, and feature of geotechnical engineering along the proposed
route.

3.0 CODES AND STANDARDS

3.1 Code and Standards

While the Specification for Geotechnical Investigation in Work Order and British
Standards (BS 5930:1999 & BS 1377:1990) as well as ASTM formed the main standards
relevant to the work conducted, other codes of practice and standards were also
consulted as needed and are listed herein below:
 Work Order-5
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 7 OF 30

 BS 1377 Parts 1 to 9 Soil for Civil Engineering Purposes

 BS 5930 Code of Practice for Site investigations
 BS 8004 Code of Practice for Foundation
 ASTM 420 Recommended practice for Investigating and Sampling Soil and Rock
for Engineering Purposes
 ASTM 421Method for Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for Particle-Size Analysis
and Determination of Soil Constants
 ASTM 422 Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
 ASTM 653 Terms and Symbols Relating to Soil and Rock Mechanics
 ASTM 1586 Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling Soils
 ASTM 1587 Practice for Thin-Walled Tube Sampling of Soils
 ASTM 2113 Method for Diamond Core Drilling for Size Investigation
 ASTM 2166 Test Methods for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil
 ASTM 2216 Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of
Soil, Rock and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures
 ASTM 2217 Method for Wet Preparation of Soil Samples for Particle-Size
Analysis and Determine of Soil Constants
 ASTM 2435 Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of
Soils40
 ASTM 2487 Test Method for Classification of soils for Engineering Purposes
 ASTM 2488 Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual
Procedure)
 ASTM 2573 Method for Field Vane Shear Test in Cohesive Soil
 ASTM 2850 Test Method for Unconsolidated, Undrained Compressive Strength
of Cohesive Soils Triaxial Compression
 ASTM 2938 Test Method for Unconfined Comp Compressive Strength of Intact
Rock Core Specimen
 ASTM 3080 Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained
Conditions
 ASTM 4220 Practices for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples
 ASTM 4253 Test Methods for Minimum Index Density of Soils and Calculations of
Relative Density
 ASTM 4318 Test method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of
Soils
 ASCE/SEI 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
 UBC (1997) (Uniform Building Code )
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 8 OF 30

 ACI 201.2R-08 Guide to Durable Concrete

 GB 50021-2001(2009 Version) Code for Investigation of Geotechnical
Engineering;
 GB 50011-2010 Code for Seismic Design of Buildings;
 GB 50007-2011 Code for Design of Building Foundations;
 JGJ 94-2008 Technical Code for Building Pile Foundations.
 GB50568-2010 Code for oil and gas field and pipeline investigation of
geotechnical engineering.

3.2 Abbreviate
COMPANY United Energy Group Limited
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BS British Standards
DS Disturbed Samples
US Undisturbed Samples
e Void ratio
Gs Specific gravity
ω Natural Moisture Content
LL Liquid limit, %
PI Plasticity index, %
PL Plastic limit, %
k Permeability coefficient, cm/s
c Cohesion, kPa
φ Angle of shearing resistance, degree
Cc Compression index
Cr Recompression or rebound index
CaSO4.2H2O Gypsum content, %
TSS Total Soluble Salts, %
SPT Standard penetration test
CPT Cone Penetration Test

4.0 METHODOLOGY

4.1 Stage of Investigation

The stage of investigation is suit for FEED.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 9 OF 30

4.2 Methodology

4.2.1 Locating of Borehole

The boreholes were located in the field by using GPS-RTK based on the coordinates
that obtained from the design layout of proposed site. The system of elevation and
coordinate is detailed in Table 4.1. The surface elevation and coordinates of boreholes
were measured again after the drilling was finished.
Table 4.1 Coordinate and Elevation System and Parameter

Reference Ellipsoid WGS84

Projection Zone UTM Zone 38N

Projection Type UTM

Latitude of Origin 0° 00’ 00” North

Central Meridian 45° 00’ 00” East

Offset in north Direction 0.0 m

Offset in East Direction 500000.0 m

Projection Ratio (scale

0.9996
factor)

Projection Height Surface of Reference Ellipsoid

Elevation 0.00m corresponds to MSL of “ Al faw ”

Elevation System
station, formerly known as Fao 1979 height.

4.2.2 Drilling
The borehole drilling is implemented by the DSB1/3.5-180 drilling machine and use the
light cable percussion boring method within 3m below the topsoil, below this depth, the
rotary core drilling method is used in combination with slurry protected the wall of
borehole from collapse. The borehole was backfilled by the clay soil blocks or cement
slurry.

4.2.3 Sampling
Soil and water samples taken in this stage were used for laboratory test, including test
for the physical and mechanical properties and analysis for chemical component of
groundwater and subsoil.
The undisturbed soil samples were taken by Sampler Insertion Equipment that is
adequate to provide a relatively rapid continuous penetration force.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 10 OF 30

The disturbed soil samples used for analysis of clay or silt content were taken from the
Thin-Wall Tubes. Other disturbed soil samples used for sieve analysis were taken
directly from the core barrel.

4.2.4 Standard Penetration Test

Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is applicable to sandy soil, silt soil and general clay soil.
Blow counts of Standard Penetration Test N may make evaluation for physical condition,
soil strength, distortion parameter, ground bearing capacity, individual pile bearing
capacity, sandy soil, silt liquefaction and piling possibility, etc.
Standard Penetration Test hammer weight is 63.5 kg and falling distance is 76 cm. The
first blow is 15 cm, and then 30 cm. The test blow number was recorded every 15 cm
(subsection numbers after 30 cm for test data), including the first blow 15 cm and testing
blow 30 cm for each of the 15 cm record data. When the actual blow number is more
than 50 blows, the test should stop and the actual penetration value be recorded in the
test period.

4.2.5 Cone Penetration Test

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is applicable to soft soil, general clay soil, silt soil, sandy
soil, and soil with little macadam. The CPT for this project adopt double-bridge probe to
test static point resistance (qc), side friction resistance (fs) in which determine bearing
capacity of the soil stratum and provide correlative engineering characteristics for
foundation design.

4.2.6 Shear Wave Velocity Test

Shear Wave Velocity Test is used to measure shear wave velocity in rock and soil. The
test for this project adopts single-borehole method to test shear wave velocity in per
stratum of the site within 30m. Equivalent shear wave velocity of site can be calculated
by the test results. Then we can obtain the construction site classification, depth of
covering, etc.

4.2.7 Soil Resistivity Test

The Soil Resistivity Test was implemented by using the Wenner Four-Electrode method
which requires that four metal electrodes be placed with equal separation in a straight
line in the surface of the soil to a depth not exceeding 5% of the minimum separation of
the electrodes. The resulting resistivity measurement represents the average resistivity
of a hemisphere of soil of a radius equal to the electrode separation.
Measurement of soil resistivity is used for the control of corrosion of buried structure. Soil
resistivity is used both for the estimation of expected corrosion rates and for the design
of cathodic protection systems.

4.2.8 Laboratory Test

The indoor laboratory test contain physical test (sieve analysis, specific weight, natural
moisture content, natural density and atterberg limits), mechanical test ( consolidation
test and shear strength test ) and chemical test (SO4, GYP, TSS, ORG, PH, Cl-), all of
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 11 OF 30

which be used to identify the physical-mechanical and chemical content of the water and
provide the parameters for the design and construction.
The corresponding test was performed on different kind of samples. The detailed
information is as follows:
 Undisturbed Soil Sample
Natural Moisture Content, Natural Density, Specific Gravity, Sieve Analysis, Atterberg
Limit, Mechanical Test, Permeation Test.
 Disturbed Soil Sample
Sieve Analysis.
 Soil Sample and Water Sample for Chemical Analysis
PH, SO4, Cl- (Chloride Content), TSS, Gyp and Org.

4.3 Workload

4.3.1 Working Arrangement

Totally, Twenty-six (26) boreholes with 10m depth (OH01～OH26) were designed on the
support tower location along the OHTL routing line and the spacing distance is about 2
km. The detailed information of boreholes is shown on the Appendix-B.

4.3.2 Finished Workload

The engineering drilling, in-situ test and laboratory test of this investigation were
executed during the same period, and the detailed finished workload is set forth as
follows:

Table 4.2 Finished Investigation Workload

Drilling and In-situ Test Indoor Laboratory Test

Borehole Quantities 26 Sieve Analysis 86

Total Footage(m) 260 Natural Moisture 67

Undisturbed Samples 53 Natural Density 44

Disturbed Samples 103 Specific Weight 60

SPT(N) 105 Atterberg Limit 85

Resistivity Test 12 Consolidation 40

Direct Shear Test 46

Soil Chemical Analysis 44

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 12 OF 30

5.0 SITE CONDITIONS

5.1 Terrain and Landform of Site

The OHTL site is flat terrain and the elevation difference is from 0.2 m to 4.02 m
(borehole ground elevation). The condition of the site is shown as the following pictures:

OH01 0H06

OH14 OH24
Figure 5.1 Picture of Site Landform

5.2 Natural Climate

The natural climate of the proposal site is summarized as follow:

Table 5.1 Site Natural Climate Table

Specification Unit Value

Average Annual Atmospheric pressure kPa a 100.2

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 13 OF 30

Specification Unit Value

Extremely Lowest Temperature °C -5

Extremely Highest Temperature °C 55 (Note 2)

Equipment Design Temperature °C 80 (Note 3)

Average Winter Temperature (Dry bulb) °C 17.8

Average Summer Temperature (Dry bulb) °C 50 (Note 4)

Wet Bulb Temperature °C 29

Average Relative Humidity (Annual) % 60.6

Average Relative Humidity (Winter) % 81

Average Relative Humidity (Summer) % 49

Max. Relative Humidity % 87

Min. Relative Humidity % 25

18(Winter)
Soil Temperature @ 1 m below ground °C
/28(Summer)

Soil Thermal Conductivity W/(m.K) 1.2

Maximum Wind Speed km/h 160 (Note 5)

Prevailing wind directions (Winter) - NNW

Prevailing wind directions (Summer) - SSE

Seismic Zone Factor “Z factor” 2A

Rainfall Intensity (max) 45 mm/D

Note:
 1) The data was provided by KEC.
 2) Maximum outdoor ambient temperature is for E&I equipment, motors, etc. under shed.
 3) This temperature shall be used for mechanical design of equipment. All equipment and
material shall be suitable for this direct sunlight temperature.
 4) This temperature shall be used for process design (e.g. Inlet air to Gas Turbines, Air
coolers, Air compressors, Diesel Generators).
 5) The max wind speed 160km/h following ASCE7-05 (3s gust wind speed MRI=500).
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 14 OF 30

6.0 SITE CONDITIONS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

6.1 Regional Geology

6.1.1 Terrain and Geomorphology

Based on our review of the Geologic Map of Iraq (see Figure 6.1), the proposed OHTL
site is located in the Mesopotamia Plain, where is covered by the Quaternary fluvial
sediments of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This area, which occupies central and
southern Iraq, is a flat terrain in general with gentle slope from northwest to southeast
towards the Arabian Gulf. Geomorphological features related to recent fluvial
accumulations such as natural levees, river terraces, alluvial fans, flood plains etc., are
very common on the surface, whereas significant features of tectonic origin are almost
absent.

Proposed
Site

Figure 6.1 General Geological Setting of Iraq

6.1.2 Mesopotamian Plain Regional Structure

The Mesopotamia Plain is a flat terrain, slopping very gently toward the Arabian Gulf.
Structural features are absent on surface. It contains several subsurface structures
including faults, folds and diapiric structures that are entirely concealed beneath the
Quaternary cover.
Folds: Surface folds are almost absent in the Mesopotamia Plain. The NW – SE trending
Tikrit and Samarra folds are the only exception, though they are hardly recognized on
surface because of the Quaternary cover. Due to the continuous growth, the Quaternary
sediments are uplifted along these structures with about (10 – 15) m relief in comparison
with the surrounding. Consequently, local drainage divide lines are developed along the
crests of these structures (Fouad, 2010a). Subsurface folds and structural noses are
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 15 OF 30

rather common structures within the Mesopotamia Plain. They are hidden beneath
Quaternary cover, usually with NW – SE trend in the central and eastern parts, following
the general trend of the Zagros Fold – Thrust Belt, but deviate largely in the extreme
southern part where the folds are N – S trending.
The folds of the Mesopotamia Plain are of three genetic types (Fouad, 2010a): The first
is the fault-related folds that have developed above an initial fault bounded structural
troughs (grabens or half grabens) because of structural inversion phenomenon.
Consequently, the geometry and the trend of such folds match the trend and geometry of
the underlying initial structural trough. Tikrit and Samarra are examples of this type. The
second type is the simple buckle folds, which formed as a result of the regional
compression that was generated by the Arabian – Eurasian (Iranian) Plates collision.
Such folds are NW – SE trending following the regional trend by the Zagros Fold –
Thrust Belt. The third type is limited to the extreme southern part of Mesopotamia Plain.
These folds are N – S trending, following the old inherited fractures of N–S Arabian trend,
which is best developed in the north of the Arabian Gulf region. The folds are usually
long, broad and with low amplitudes (such as Zubair and Rumaila structures), and are
thought to be related to movement of salt substratum. The presence of the Late
Precambrian – Early Cambrian Hormuz Salt and its active movement in the north of the
gulf region, in general and in this part of the Mesopotamia Plain, in particular is the
reason behind the development of these folds. According to Fouad (2010a), the diapiric
salt structures beneath the folds in Iraq have pierced the overlying sedimentary
sequence to different stratigraphic levels, but have reached the surface only in one
locality, to the south of Basrah city, known as Jabel Sanam. It is a circular dome of about
4 km diameter and more than 100 m of relief. Igneous rock blocks and fragments have
been reported in the core, and are surrounded by Miocene – Pliocene sedimentary rock
units dipping towards the peripheries.
The igneous rocks were classified as dolerite and of Infracambrian age. Similar to other
igneous rock fragments that have been reported in southwest Iran salt structures, it is
believed that these rocks were stripped off the basement and brought to the surface by
the upward movement of the salt. Recent tectonic activities within the Mesopotamia
Plain are well reflected on the preset day geomorphological landforms.
Faults: A network of NW – SE trending faults have been developed in the northern part
between south Mosul and south Baghdad, in particular. These faults are of normal type
and forming a complex set of grabens, half grabens and solitary faults. Some of the
grabens have been partially inverted, forming anticlinal folds or structural noses above
them, whereas others have not.
It is critically important to mention that almost all of the mentioned tectonic divisions of
Iraq, have had considered the present day "Mesopotamia Plain" as the entire
Mesopotamian basin (or zone). This consideration has caused a lot of confusion and
uncertainties to the true structural nature of the basin. Actually, the Mesopotamia
Foredeep (Basin) is much larger and areally extensive, than that of the Mesopotamian
Zone or Mesopotamia Plain, which forms only a part of it (Fouad, 2010a). The present
day Mesopotamia Foredeep (Basin) extends from northeast Syria to the Straits of
Hormuz. It consists of two domains, the first is terrestrial one that covers parts of
northeast Syria, Iraq, and parts of Kuwait and the coastal plains of Iran, and the second
is marine, represented by the Arabian Gulf Basin.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 16 OF 30

6.1.3 Mesopotamian Plain Tectonic

The constructed Neotectonic Map of Iraq shows that the Mesopotamia Plain is a
subsiding basin with a NW – SE trend and of oval shape. The maximum subsidence, as
expressed by means of contour lines, is 2500 m, being measured on the top of the Fatha
Formation (Middle Miocene), it forms an elongated oval shape, with NW – SE trend and
extends from east of Al-Khalis, for about 30 km, to west of Badra, for about 10 km. The
basin is asymmetrical, indicating very steep eastern rim as compared to the western one.
This asymmetry is typical of foreland basins, formed because of plate collision,
manifesting the shape of the subsiding foreland basin, in front of the rising Zagros
Mountain. Such asymmetry also indicates tectonic tilting of the basin. The length of the
basin, in Iraq is about 540 km, whereas the width is variable; it is 80 km, in the extreme
northern part, 200 km between Hilla and Badra, and 230 km between Samawa and Ali
Al-Gharbi, and 40 km near Basrah (only the included part in Iraq) .
Within this huge continuously subsiding Mesopotamia Basin, there are many uplifted
areas, which are still active, indicating neotectonic movements. The Neotectonic Map of
Iraq (S does not show the uplifted areas, because of the scale limitations. Those areas
are evidenced by many Quaternary landforms, like topographic indications, abandoned
river channels, shifting of river courses, active and inactive alluvial fans. Such features
are evidences for neotectonic activities.
It is worth to mention that the majority of the uplifted areas, within the Mesopotamia Plain
represent nowadays oil fields. Their trend differ in the plain, in the southern part they
have N–S trend, whereas in the central and northern parts of the basin, the trend
changes to NW–SE. It is also noticed that the distal parts of the majority of the alluvial
fans, both active and inactive, which are developed in the plain, are parallel to the those
uplifted areas (oil fields).

Proposed
Site

Figure 6.2 Neotectonic map of the Mesopotamian Plain

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 17 OF 30

6.2 Stratigraphy

6.2.1 Overlying Stratum Profile

The Mesopotamia Plain is covered entirely by Quaternary sediments; no pre-Quaternary
rocks are exposed. The CGG (1974), using magnetic and gravity data, estimated the
depth of the basement to be between 8km, in the western part and 14km, in the eastern
part of the area. The area contains almost a complete sedimentary succession without
significant breaks.
The complete thickness of the Paleozoic sequence is not penetrated in any borehole in
Iraq. Only very few wells in the Mesopotamia Plain have reached the upper most part of
the Paleozoic sequence. However, the thickness of the Paleozoic sequence is estimated
to be around 5 Km. By correlations with other parts of Iraq, as well as in most of Arabia,
it is believed that the Paleozoic sequence is dominated by siliciclastic sediments
deposited in a shallow epicontinental sea.
The Mesozoic sequence is composed of an almost complete sedimentary succession
without significant breaks. The average thickness of the sequence is about 5km. The
sequence usually consists of neretic and lagoonal evaporites, shales and carbonates
that grade up into an alternation of carbonates and sandstones of shallow marine nature.
The Cenozoic sequence usually consists of Paleogene open marine carbonates that
grades up into Neogene lagoonal and restricted marine evaporite facies, followed by
molasses type deltaic and continental clastics (Fouad, 2010b). The average thickness of
the sequence is highly variable, in different parts of the Iraqi territory.
The Quaternary sediments exhibit an exceptional development in the Mesopotamia Plain.
They consist of sands, silts and clays that are mainly related to the cyclic fluvial
sediments of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, with their tributaries and distributaries.
These sediments form extensive, flood plains with a complex network of natural levees
and channels, and terraces. The Quaternary sediments of the Mesopotamia Plain exhibit
progressive thickening from northwest to southeast. They reach their maximum
thickness near Basrah city, about 180m.

6.2.2 Subsurface Conditions of Site

According to the visual-manual identification and description combined with the results of
sampling laboratory test, the subsoil strata at the proposed site which explored by
twenty-six (26) boreholes at overall site mainly consist of fine-grained soil.
For more detailed soil descriptions and stratifications at a particular borehole location,
the respective Borehole Log, supplied in Appendix-B, should be reviewed.

6.3 Hydrogeology

6.3.1 Monitoring Method and Water Table

The groundwater was encountered and observed in all boreholes during the time of
investigation, the water table was directly measured after a stabilization period at the
termination of drilling.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 18 OF 30

Based on the results of measuring from the borehole shown on Appendix B, the
groundwater table was variable ranging from 1.22m to 3.78m below the existing ground
surface and its elevation ranging from -1.25m to 0.24m.

6.3.2 Influential Factors of Groundwater Variation

Considering the obtained groundwater readings and observed soil moisture conditions, it
is anticipated that groundwater will generally be encountered at depth from 1.22m to
3.78m across of most the site in the time of investigation, which is considered very
shallow.
It should be noted, however, that groundwater elevations tend to fluctuate with seasonal
and climatic variations, as well as with some types of construction operations. Therefore,
the elevation of the groundwater table may be different at other times of the year, and
vary in different parts of the site, from the elevations presented in this report.

7.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SUBSOIL PROPERTY INDEXS

7.1 In-situ Test

7.1.1 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

The Standard Penetration Test was implemented in twenty-six (26) boreholes, the
detailed information of measured results is shown on the Appendix-C.
The SPT results have not been corrected, and the measured value on site can be used
for the confirmation of sand compactness, clay properties and unconfined strength, and
also be used for the evaluation of sand or silt liquefaction and the bearing capacity,
deformation parameters of subsoil.

7.1.2 Soil Resistivity Test

The measuring depth of soil resistivity is 5.0 meters below the ground and the equal
separation of metal electrodes is 1.0 meter, that is, the resistivity results are obtained
from the position of 1.0m, 2.0m, 3.0m, 4.0m and 5.0m below the ground, all of which is
shown on Appendix C, the location of testing point is shown on Appendix-B.

7.2 Physical and Mechanical Test

The physical and mechanical test was implemented in accordance with the relevant
standard and codes on all samples of which the disturbed sand soil samples had only
been used for sieve analysis and the undisturbed samples were used for all of other
physical and mechanical test. The detailed information of measured results are shown
on the Appendix-D Laboratory Test Results.

8.0 CORROSION EVALUATION OF SUBSOIL AND GROUNDWATER

8.1 Corrosion Evaluation of Subsoil

8.1.1 Subsoil Laboratory Test

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 19 OF 30

Corrosion of the subsoil environment at site with respect to construction evaluation for
reinforced concrete and steel structures using the chemical test results of soil samples
performed in laboratory and presented in the following table.
Table 8.1 Soil Chemical Test Results

Depth(m) Chemical Composition (%)

BH No. Sample No.
From - To PH SO4 Cl TSS Org

OH02 1 1.50-1.70 8.35 0.23 0.31 2.4 2.4

OH04 1 1.50-1.70 8.43 0.38 0.25 2.55 2.2

OH05 1 1.00-1.20 8.03 0.41 0.32 1.93 1.11

OH06 1 1.50-1.70 7.9 0.31 0.32 2.51 1.8

OH07 1 1.00-1.20 8.12 0.32 0.29 1.72 0.93

OH08 1 1.50-1.70 8.34 0.39 0.26 2.0 0.87

OH09 1 1.50-1.70 7.94 0.41 0.34 10.34 1.23

OH10 1 1.50-1.70 8.32 0.49 0.32 1.76 1.4

OH11 1 1.50-1.70 7.93 0.37 0.22 1.3 0.86

OH12 1 1.50-1.70 8.12 0.39 0.31 0.87 2.1

OH14 1 1.50-1.70 8.35 0.35 0.33 1.54 1.67

OH16 1 1.50-1.70 8.34 0.42 0.31 1.43 0.14

OH18 1 1.50-1.70 8.23 0.24 0.24 3.21 3.21

OH20 1 1.50-1.70 8.23 0.54 0.29 1.32 1.32

OH22 1 1.50-1.70 8.12 0.45 0.28 1.65 2.87

OH24 1 1.50-1.70 8.34 0.34 0.27 1.98 1.55

OH26 1 1.50-1.70 8.12 0.43 0.27 6.43 2.21

8.1.2 Corrosion Evaluation for Concrete Structure

Considering the fact that the corrosion against concrete structure below ground water
table mainly depends on the corrosion of ground water, therefore, soil of first two meter
against concrete structure have been evaluated based on water-soluble sulphate (SO4)
in soil in accordance with ACI 201.2R-08 Guide to Durable Concrete and presented in
the Table 8.2.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 20 OF 30

Table 8.2 Evaluation Criterions of Corrosion Concrete Structure ACI 201.2R-08

Based on the chemical test results of seventeen (17) sampling recovered from borehole
detailed in Table 8.3, the corrosion grade against concrete sturcture can be estimated as
Class 2.
Table 8.3 Corrosion Grade against Concrete Structure based on SO4

BH No. Depth (m) SO4 (%) Corrosion Grade

OH02 1.50-1.70 0.23 Class 2

OH04 1.50-1.70 0.38 Class 2

OH05 1.00-1.20 0.41 Class 2

OH06 1.50-1.70 0.31 Class 2

OH07 1.00-1.20 0.32 Class 2

OH08 1.50-1.70 0.39 Class 2

OH09 1.50-1.70 0.41 Class 2

OH10 1.50-1.70 0.49 Class 2

OH11 1.50-1.70 0.37 Class 2

OH12 1.50-1.70 0.39 Class 2

OH14 1.50-1.70 0.35 Class 2

OH16 1.50-1.70 0.42 Class 2

OH18 1.50-1.70 0.24 Class 2

OH20 1.50-1.70 0.54 Class 2

OH22 1.50-1.70 0.45 Class 2

OH24 1.50-1.70 0.34 Class 2

OH26 1.50-1.70 0.43 Class 2

8.1.3 Corrosion Evaluation for Steel Structure

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 21 OF 30

The subsoil corrosion against steel structure have been evaluated based on resistivity in
accordance with Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineer (GB 50051-2001). The
evaluation criterions of corrosion against steel structure in GB 50021-2001 is detailed in
Table 8.4 below. Based on the twelve (12) points of resistivity with depth of 1m to 5m
listed in Table 8.5, the corrosion grade against steel sturcture can be estimated as
Strong Class.

Table 8.4 Evaluation Criterions of Corrosion against Steel Structure in GB 50021-2001

Table 8.5 Corrosion Grade against Steel Structure based on Resistivity

Borehole Mean Value of
Measuring Depth(m) Corrosion Grade
No. Resistivity(Ω•m)
1 3.87 Strong

2 4.33 Strong

OH01 3 6.45 Strong

4 3.42 Strong

5 2.34 Strong

1 5.23 Strong

2 3.45 Strong

OH03 3 4.33 Strong

4 5.88 Strong

5 3.23 Strong

1 4.33 Strong

2 3.42 Strong

OH05 3 5.21 Strong

4 5.89 Strong

5 6.23 Strong
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 22 OF 30

Borehole Mean Value of

Measuring Depth(m) Corrosion Grade
No. Resistivity(Ω•m)
1 8.99 Strong
2 8.80 Strong
0H07 3 7.21 Strong
4 4.27 Strong
5 4.89 Strong
1 10.05 Strong
2 8.82 Strong
0H09 3 9.42 Strong
4 7.39 Strong
5 9.31 Strong
1 9.22 Strong
2 6.28 Strong
OH11 3 6.28 Strong
4 6.81 Strong
5 16.33 Strong
1 22.61 Medium
2 7.90 Strong
OH14 3 8.32 Strong
4 7.49 Strong
5 3.92 Strong
1 9.42 Strong
2 8.32 Strong
OH16 3 11.02 Strong
4 12.56 Strong
5 9.08 Strong
1 9.29 Strong
2 8.11 Strong
OH19 3 10.21 Strong
4 9.23 Strong
5 7.90 Strong
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 23 OF 30

Borehole Mean Value of

Measuring Depth(m) Corrosion Grade
No. Resistivity(Ω•m)
1 8.99 Strong
2 9.01 Strong
OH22 3 9.33 Strong
4 10.23 Strong
5 10.98 Strong
1 7.89 Strong
2 9.82 Strong
OH24 3 7.89 Strong
4 6.77 Strong
5 8.99 Strong
1 3.92 Strong
2 10.23 Strong
OH26 3 9.83 Strong
4 7.65 Strong
5 7.66 Strong

8.2 Corrosion Evaluation of Groundwater

8.2.1 Groundwater Laboratory Test

Two water samplers have been performed for chemical test in laboratory and the test
results are presented the following table.
Table 8.6 Groundwater Laboratory Test Results
Mg2+ Ca2+ Cl- HCO3 SO4
BH No. PH
(mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (ppm)
OH12 123 546 26103 12.39 7.23 1023

OH26 245 478 28703 9.87 7.38 1272

8.2.2 Corrosion Evaluation for Concrete Structure

The groundwater against concrete structure have been evaluated based on SO 4 in
accordance with Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineer (GB 50051-2001). The
evaluation criterions of corrosion against concrete structure in GB 50021-2001 is
detailed in Table 8.7 below. The environmental type of site is estimated as class II based
on the site conditions described as drought area with tropical desert climate and most of
low permeability subsoil layers such as lean clay.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 24 OF 30

Table 8.7 Evaluation Criterions of Corrosion against Concrete Structure in GB 50021-2001

Based on the two (2) water chemical test listed in Table 8.8, the corrosion grade against
concrete sturcture can be estimated as Weak.
Table 8.8 Corrosion Grade against Concrete Structure based on SO4

BH No. SO4 (ppm) Corrosion Grade

OH12 1023 Weak

OH26 1272 Weak

8.2.3 Corrosion Evaluation for Steel Embedded in Concrete

The groundwater against steel embeded in concrete structure have been evaluated
based on Cl- in accordance with Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineer (GB
50051-2001). The evaluation criterions of corrosion against steel embeded in concrete
structure in GB 50021-2001 is detailed in Table 8.9 below.

Table 8.9 Evaluation Criterions of Corrosion against Steel in Concrete in GB 50021-2001

Based on the two (2) groundwater chemical test listed in Table 8.10, the corrosion grade
against steel embeded in concrete sturcture can be estimated as Strong.
Table 8.10 Corrosion Grade against Concrete Structure based on Cl-

BH No. Cl- (mg/L) Corrosion Grade

OH12 26103 Strong
OH26 28703 Strong
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 25 OF 30

9.0 SEISMIC EFFECTIVE EVALUATION

9.1 Seismic Hazard Distribution

The seismic hazard distribution is shown on the figure 9.1. Regarding the intensity level
of seismic effect, the proposed site located in the yellow area, and so the intensity level
is estimated as medium. What need to be emphasized is that this information for seismic
hazard on site is just approximate, if there is any construction sensitive to seismic effect,
the detailed seismic evaluation shall be performed prior to detailed design of those
buildings.

Proposed
Site

Figure 9.1 Seismic Hazard Distribution Map

9.2 Site Classification

Based on results of shear wave velocity test conducted in SWP area, whcih is shown in
BK91-1101-SWP-999-GIV-RPT-0001, the proposal site can be classified as Class D or
Class Ⅲ, respectively.

9.3 Recommendation for Seismic Parameter

Due to the absence of official seismic fundamental data and site-specific study about site
peak ground acceleration, we collected and made some conclusions about the seismic
hazard zoning of proposed oilfield site, all of which are stated as following:
➢ Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years
Based on the Peak Ground Acceleration Map of Iraq collected from the National
Earthquake Information Center (NEIC), the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with 10%
probability of exceedance in 50 years of the proposal site is 0.16g to 0.24g. (shown on
the Figure 9.2).
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 26 OF 30

Proposed
Site

Figure 9.2 Peak Ground Acceleration Map Provided by NEIC

In accordance with the seismic zone factor table below specified in Uniform Builing Code
(1997), the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with 10% probability of exceedance in 50
years is 0.15g accordingly based on the 2A of seismic zone of site environmental data
provided by Kuwait COMPANY.

Table 9.1 Seismic Zone Factor Z in UBC97

➢ Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years

In accordance with Iraqi Seismic Code 2017, the PGA with 2% probability of exceedance
in 50 years of the proposal site can be estimated as 0.2g.

Figure 9.3 Peak Ground Acceleration Map Provided by Iraqi Seismic Code 2017
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 27 OF 30

➢ Short Period Spectral Acceleration (Ss) and Long Period Spectral Acceleration (S1)
In accordance with Iraqi Seismic Code 2017, the Short Period Spectral Acceleration (Ss)
and Long Period Spectral Acceleration (S1) of the proposal site can be estimated as 0.3g
and 0.1g, respectively.

Figure 9.4 Ss and S1 in Iraqi Seismic Code

➢ Site Coefficient Fa and Fv

The site coefficient Fa and Fv can follow the Table 9.2 specified in ASCE-10 Minimum
Design Loads for Building and Other Structures based on site class.

Table 9.2 Site Coefficient based on Site Class ASCE-10

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 28 OF 30

➢ Recommendation for Seismic Parameter

As concluded from the above studies, the seismic parameter is recommended as follow:

Table 9.3 Recommendation for Seismic Parameter

Seismic Parameter Recommended Values

PGA with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years 0.15g

PGA with 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years 0.2g

Short period spectral acceleration, Ss 0.3g

Long period spectral acceleration, S1 0.1g

Site coefficient, Fa 1.56

Site coefficient, Fv 2.40

Design spectral acceleration-short period, SDs (=2Ss*Fa/3) 0.312g

Design spectral acceleration-long period, SD1(=2S1*Fv/3) 0.160g

9.4 Liquefaction Analysis

Based on the results of exploratory at site and indoor test, no saturated and loose sand
and silt soil is encountered at the subsoil, therefore, liquefaction assessment should not
take into account for design.

10.0 ADVERSE GEOLOGICAL ACTION AND POOR SUBSOIL CONDITIONS

Based on the review of the regional geology and subsoil encountered in the process of
Site investigation, there are not adverse geological action existed at this site.
 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 29 OF 30

11.0 EVALUATION OF SUBSOIL AND FOUNDATION

11.1 Field Stability and Suitability

The topography of proposed site is plain, flat and wide. No adverse geological action
exists at the proposed site represented above, and so the site is stable and suitable for
construction.

11.2 Bearing Capacity and Modulus of Subsoil

Based on results of in-situ test and laboratory test and local experience, the estimated
mechanical values of first layer of each borehole are given in the following table.
Table 11.1 Recommended Bearing Capacity Characteristic Value and Modulus

Borehole No. fak (kPa) Es (MPa) Remark

OH01 100 5

OH02 110 5.3

OH03 120 5.5

OH04 100 5

OH05 100 5

OH06 100 5

OH07 120 5.5

OH08 100 5

OH09 100 5

OH10 120 5.5

OH11 120 5.5

OH12 110 5.3

OH13 110 5.3

OH14 130 5.8

OH15 120 5.5

OH16 100 5

OH17 100 5

OH18 110 5.3

 BLOCK 9 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PHASE 1

TOPOGRAPHICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY

FEED DOC.NO. BK91-1101-GEN-999-GIV-RPT-0002 REV.: 0 30 OF 30

Borehole No. fak (kPa) Es (MPa) Remark

OH19 120 5.5

OH20 120 5.5

OH21 120 5.5

OH22 130 5.8

OH23 130 5.8

OH24 120 5.5

OH25 130 5.8

OH26 130 5.8

Where, fak=Bearing Capacity Characteristic Value, Es=Compression Modulus (The

corresponding pressure between 100kPa and 200kPa), E0=Elastic Modulus.

11.3 Foundation Recommendations

Based on the estimated applied loading of the proposal OHTL and POS, the shallow
foundation is recommended as the foundation in accordance with the subsoil conditions.
The estimated bearing capacity and modulus of first layer of each borehole is given in
table 11.1. Pile foundation should be used where special requirements are in need.

12.0 CONCULSION AND RECOMMENDATION

1) The topography of proposed site is plain, flat and wide. No adverse geological actions
exist at this site, and so the site is stable and suitable for construction.
2) The groundwater table was variable ranging from 1.22m to 3.78m below the existing
ground surface and its elevation ranging from -1.25m to 0.24m.
3) The corrosion grade of subsoil against concrete structure can be estimated as Class 2,
and have strong corrosive against Steel Structure. The corrosivity of groundwater
towards concrete structures is week and it has Strong corrosivity towards metal
structures in concrete.
4) The bearing capacity and mechanical parameters of layers refers to Chapter 11.1.
5) Shallow foundation could be adopted for tower of OHTL and POS, otherwise, the pile
foundation shall be used if the bearing capacity of shallow foundation is not enough or
fine sand with liquefaction potential is encountered.
Appendix-A List of Investigation Boreholes
 List of Investigation Boreholes
Stable Underground
Coordinates Sampling Number
Borehole Borehole Water
SPT
Borehole No. Borehole Type Depth Elevation Remarks
(counts)
(m) (m) Undisturbed Disturbed Water Depth Elevation
Y(m) X(m)
Sample Sample Sample (m) (m)

OH01 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 4.02 787367.780 3431303.230 3 3 3 3.78 0.24

OH02 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 3.55 787380.240 3429468.530 3 3 3 3.60 -0.05

OH03 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 3.30 787380.190 3427193.860 4 2 4 3.25 0.05

OH04 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.82 787346.630 3424953.240 4 2 4 3.50 -0.68

OH05 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.38 787453.430 3422705.990 4 2 4 3.31 -0.93

OH06 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.90 785374.990 3423000.955 4 2 4 3.00 -1.10

OH07 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.77 783401.370 3422948.174 4 2 4 2.80 -1.03

OH08 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.35 781328.000 3422659.000 4 2 4 2.43 -1.08

OH09 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.50 780414.000 3420956.000 4 2 4 2.40 -0.90

OH10 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.12 779933.000 3419498.000 4 2 4 2.24 -1.12

OH11 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.20 777600.160 3419627.759 4 2 4 1.24 -1.04

OH12 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.11 777702.160 3417623.151 4 2 4 1 2.23 -1.12

OH13 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.57 777755.140 3415601.245 4 2 4 1.82 -1.25

OH14 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.33 777817.260 3413230.229 5 1 5 1.45 -1.12

OH15 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.22 777731.980 3411148.455 4 2 4 1.22 -1.00

OH16 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.61 777735.970 3409155.937 4 2 4 1.52 -0.91

OH17 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.78 777676.470 3407213.503 4 2 4 1.44 -0.66

OH18 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.23 777578.270 3405340.852 4 2 4 2.43 -1.20

OH19 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.18 777469.480 3403266.209 4 2 4 3.28 -1.10
 Stable Underground
Coordinates Sampling Number
Borehole Borehole Water
SPT
Borehole No. Borehole Type Depth Elevation Remarks
(counts)
(m) (m) Undisturbed Disturbed Water Depth Elevation
Y(m) X(m)
Sample Sample Sample (m) (m)

OH20 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.18 775495.100 3403045.461 4 2 4 3.25 -1.07

OH21 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.18 773456.500 3403164.291 4 2 4 3.20 -1.02

OH22 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.74 771527.800 3403276.713 4 2 4 2.60 -0.86

OH23 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 0.73 769678.600 3403384.502 4 2 4 1.72 -0.99

OH24 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 1.84 767758.250 3402090.106 4 2 4 2.95 -1.11

OH25 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.04 765688.680 3401223.251 5 2 4 3.01 -0.97

OH26 SPT & Sampling Borehole 10.00 2.28 764017.890 3400200.812 5 2 4 1 3.45 -1.17

260.00 105 53 103 2

Appendix-B Borehole Layout, Engineering Profile and Logs
 FIGURE LEGEND
BH Number () BH Elevation
BH Depth Water Elevation ~ Resistivity Test Point ~ Lean Clay B Profile line Number

~ SPT and Sampling Borehole 12 __ 2 I Profile Line and Number Fat Clay New OHTL

~ SPT Borehole ~ Wave Vilosity Test ~ Silty Clay

1.50(-6.32}
Ground Line
Boundary Line and Elevation
1~. -- 6.78(1.60) Stable Water Table Depth and Elevation
2• Undisturbed Sampling Position and Number
Disturbed Sampling Position and Number

~ ~ Water Sampling l N=B.O

6.78(1.60)
Sampling Borehole Stable Water Depth SPT Position and Counts

CPTPosition and Pc/fs

~ Layer Boundary Line Ed Sand

~ Layer Number
ore o e ayout Scale 1:150000 cD
~lllllo!aliao
~~

a l Pl•S..011.. - 1.

ftati·· ~
.. ..
~~1-~.i ~
 Lean Clay: gray-black, blue-gray,
medium, medium to hard dry strength,
medium to hard toughness, containing
dark organic spot

1
1.50

2
1 3.00
=2.0
3.00-3.30
(1)3.78
2021.05.11

3
4.50

-1.98 6.00 6.00 4

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.00
soft, soft to medium dry strength, low =4.0
to toughness, containing dark organic 6.00-6.30
spot and iron oxide compound

5
2 8.00

6 =2.0
-5.98 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown -black, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness, containing dark organic spot

1
1.50

2
3.00
=3.0
3.00-3.30
(1)3.60
2021.05.11

-0.95 4.50 4.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, medium, soft to medium dry
strength, low to medium toughness.
partially sandwiched with thin sand
layer

4
6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30

5
8.00

6 =2.0
-6.45 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, medium, soft to medium dry
strength, low to medium toughness.
partially sandwiched with thin sand
layer

1
1 1.50
=4.0
1.50-1.80

0.30 3.00 3.00 2

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 3.00
(1)3.25
blue-gray, medium, soft to medium dry 2021.05.11
strength, low to medium toughness.
partially sandwiched with thin sand
layer.

3
4.50
=2.0
4.50-4.80

4
6.00

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-6.70 10.00 7.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown- Reddish, taupe,
blue-gray, medium, medium dry
strength, low to medium toughness,
containing dark organic spot

1
1.50

2
3.00
=2.0
3.00-3.30 (1)3.50
2021.05.11

-1.68 4.50 4.50 3

Lean Clay: Brown- Reddish, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, medium, medium dry
strength, low to medium toughness,
containing dark organic spot
11

-3.18 6.00 1.50 4

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =4.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 6.00-6.30
dark organic spot and a small amount
of shell

5
2 8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-7.18 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot and a small amount
of shell
1
1.00
=2.0
1.00-1.30
1

2
2.50
-0.62 3.00 3.00
Lean Clay: Brown -gray, taupe,
blue-gray, medium, medium dry (1)3.31
strength, low to medium toughness, 2021.05.11
containing dark organic spot and a
small amount of shell, partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

11
3
5.00
=5.0
5.00-5.30

-4.12 6.50 3.50 4

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot

5
8.00
2 =2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =3.0
-7.62 10.00 3.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot

1
1 1.50

-1.10 3.00 3.00 2 (1)3.00

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 3.00 2021.05.10
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =2.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 3.00-3.30
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

3
4.50

4
6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30
2

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-8.10 10.00 7.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer
1
1.00
=4.0
1.00-1.30
1

(1)2.80
-1.23 3.00 3.00 2 2021.05.10
Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 3.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

3
4.50
=2.0
4.50-4.80

4
2 6.50

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-8.23 10.00 7.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium to stiff, medium to hard dry
strength, medium toughness,
containing dark organic spot

1
1 1.50

(1)2.43
2021.05.10

-1.65 3.00 3.00 2

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 3.00
medium to stiff, medium to hard dry =2.0
strength, medium toughness, 3.00-3.30
containing dark organic spot

3
2 4.50

-4.65 6.00 3.00 4

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, 6.00
blue-gray, the main mineral =2.0
composition of sand is quartz, 6.00-6.30
feldspar, well sorted, poorly grade,
mainly sub-angular and sub-circular,
most of the clay content is less than
10%, saturated, dense, the local phase
changes into fine sand containing
cohesive soil

5
3 f 8.00
=24.0
8.00-8.30

6 =27.0
-8.65 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown,
blue-gray, the main mineral
composition of sand is quartz,
feldspar, well sorted, poorly grade,
mainly sub-angular and sub-circular,
most of the clay content is less than
10%, saturated, dense, the local phase
changes into fine sand containing
cohesive soil 1
1.50

(1)2.40
2021.05.10

2
1 3.00
=2.0
3.00-3.30

3
4.50

-4.50 6.00 6.00 4

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =4.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 6.00-6.30
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

5
2 8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-8.50 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

1
1.50

(1)2.24
1 2021.05.10

2
3.00
=4.0
3.00-3.30

-3.38 4.50 4.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot

4
6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-8.88 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

(1)1.24
2021.05.10
1
1.50
=4.0
1.50-1.80

2
3.00

-4.30 4.50 4.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =2.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 4.50-4.80
dark organic spot

4
6.00

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-9.80 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot

1
1.50

(1)2.23
2021.05.10

2
1 3.00
=3.0
3.00-3.30

3
4.50

-4.89 6.00 6.00 4

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =8.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 6.00-6.30
dark organic spot

5
2 8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-8.89 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

1
1.50
(1)1.82
2021.05.10

2
3.00
=3.0
3.00-3.30

-3.93 4.50 4.50 3

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 4.50
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

4
6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-9.43 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

1 (1)1.45
1 1.50 2021.05.09

-2.67 3.00 3.00 2

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 3.00
medium, medium dry strength, medium =10.0
toughness 3.00-3.30

3
4.50
=2.0
4.50-4.80

4
6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30
2

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-9.67 10.00 7.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot
1
(1)1.22
2021.05.09
-1.28 1.50 1.50 1
Clayey Sand (SC): Gray-brown, , the 1.50
main mineral composition of sand is
quartz, feldspar, well sorted, poorly
grade, mainly sub-angular and
1 1-1 sub-circular, most of the clay content is
less than 15%, saturated, dense, the
local phase changes into fine sand
containing cohesive soil
-2.78 3.00 1.50 2
Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 3.00
medium, medium dry strength, medium =9.0
toughness , partially sandwiched with 3.00-3.30
thin sand layer
11

-4.28 4.50 1.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

4
6.00
=3.0
6.00-6.30

5
8.00
=3.0
8.00-8.30

6 =3.0
-9.78 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer

1 (1)1.52
1 1.50 2021.05.09

-2.39 3.00 3.00 2

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 3.00
medium, medium dry strength, medium =2.0
toughness , partially sandwiched with 3.00-3.30
thin sand layer
11

-3.89 4.50 1.50 3

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 4.50
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

4
6.00
=4.0
6.00-6.30

5
8.00
=4.0
8.00-8.30

6 =7.0
-9.39 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot , partially
sandwiched with thin sand layer
1
1.00
=2.0
1.00-1.30 (1)1.44
2021.05.09

1
2
2.50

-3.22 4.00 4.00 3

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 4.00
=2.0
medium, medium dry strength, medium 4.00-4.30
toughness

4
6.00

5
8.00
=4.0
8.00-8.30

6 =3.0
-9.22 10.00 6.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

1
1 1.50

(1)2.43
2021.05.09

-1.77 3.00 3.00 2

Lean Clay with sand : Brown , taupe, 3.00
blue-gray, medium, medium dry =3.0
strength, medium toughness , partially 3.00-3.30
sandwiched with thin sand layer
1 1-1

-3.27 4.50 1.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot

4
6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30

5
8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =3.0
-8.77 10.00 5.50 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness , partially sandwiched with
thin sand layer

1
1.50

2
3.00
=6.0 (1)3.28
3.00-3.30 2021.05.09

-2.32 4.50 4.50 3

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, the main 4.50
mineral composition of sand is quartz,
feldspar, well sorted, poorly grade,
mainly sub-angular and sub-circular,
1 1-1 most of the clay content is less than
15%, saturated, dense, the local phase
changes into fine sand containing
cohesive soil
-3.82 6.00 1.50 4
Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =17.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 6.00-6.30
dark organic spot, with little sand

5
2 8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-7.82 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

1
1 1.50

-0.82 3.00 3.00 2

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 3.00
=6.0 (1)3.25
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing 3.00-3.30 2021.05.09
dark organic spot, partially sandwiched
with thin sand layer

3
11 4.50

-3.82 6.00 3.00 4

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, the 6.00
main mineral composition of sand is =2.0
quartz, feldspar, well sorted, poorly 6.00-6.30
grade, mainly sub-angular and
sub-circular, most of the clay content is
1 1-1 less than 16%, saturated, dense, the
local phase changes into fine sand
containing cohesive soil

-5.82 8.00 2.00 5

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 8.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =12.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 8.00-8.30
dark organic spot, partially sandwiched
with thin sand layer
2

6 =2.0
-7.82 10.00 2.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium dry strength, medium
toughness

1
1.50
=9.0
1.50-1.80

2
3.00 (1)3.20
2021.05.09

-2.32 4.50 4.50 3

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, blue-gray, 4.50
the main mineral composition of sand is
quartz, feldspar, well sorted, poorly
grade, mainly sub-angular and
1 1-1 sub-circular, most of the clay content is
less than 15%, saturated, dense, the
local phase changes into fine sand
containing cohesive soil
-3.82 6.00 1.50 4
Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 6.00
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry =19.0
strength, low to toughness, containing 6.00-6.30
dark organic spot, partially sandwiched
with thin sand layer

5
2 8.00
=2.0
8.00-8.30

6 =2.0
-7.82 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown- Reddish, taupe,
blue-gray, medium to stiff, medium to
hard dry strength, medium toughness,
with little sand

1
1.50

1
(1)2.60
2021.05.08
2
3.00
=12.0
3.00-3.30

-2.76 4.50 4.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot

4
6.00
2 =2.0
6.00-6.30

-6.26 8.00 3.50 5

Lean Clay: Brown- Reddish, taupe, 8.00
blue-gray, medium, medium dry =2.0
strength, medium toughness, with little 8.00-8.30
sand

21

6 =5.0
-8.26 10.00 2.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray,
medium, medium to stiff dry strength,
medium toughness, with yellowish
sand

1
1.50 (1)1.72
2021.05.08

2
3.00
=19.0
3.00-3.30

-3.77 4.50 4.50 3

Lean silty Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot
2

-5.27 6.00 1.50 4

Lean Clay: Brown , taupe, blue-gray, 6.00
medium, medium dry strength, medium =3.0
toughness, partially sandwiched with 6.00-6.30
thin sand layer

5
21 8.00
=12.0
8.00-8.30

6 =6.0
-9.27 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Gray-black, taupe, medium,
medium dry strength, low to medium
toughness, containing dark organic
spot and a small amount of shell,
partially sandwiched with thin sand
layer

1
1.50

2 (1)2.95
1 3.00 2021.05.08
=5.0
3.00-3.30

3
4.50

-4.16 6.00 6.00 4

Lean Clay with sand: Gray-black, 6.00
taupe, blue-gray, medium, medium dry =4.0
strength, low to medium toughness, 6.00-6.30
containing dark organic spot and a
small amount of shell, partially
1 1-1 sandwiched with thin sand layer

-6.16 8.00 2.00 5

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, the main 8.00
mineral composition of sand is quartz, =9.0
feldspar, well sorted, poorly grade, 8.00-8.30
mainly sub-angular and sub-circular,
most of the clay content is less than
3 f 15%, saturated, dense, the local phase
changes into fine sand containing
cohesive soil

6 =5.0
-8.16 10.00 2.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, medium, medium dry
strength, low to medium toughness,
containing dark organic spot and a
small amount of shell

1
1.50

2 (1)3.01
3.00 2021.05.08
=15.0
3.00-3.30

-2.46 4.50 4.50 3

Lean Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft to medium, medium dry
strength, low to medium toughness,
containing dark organic spot and a
small amount of shell

4
11 6.00
=2.0
6.00-6.30

-5.46 7.50 3.00 5

Lean Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 7.50
blue-gray, soft to medium, medium dry =2.0
strength, low to medium toughness, 7.50-7.80
containing dark organic spot and a
21 small amount of shell

-6.96 9.00 1.50 6

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, the main 9.00
mineral composition of sand is quartz, =4.0
9.00-9.30
3 f feldspar, well sorted, poorly grade,
mainly sub-angular and sub-circular,
most of the clay content is less than =12.0
-7.96 10.00 1.00 15% 9.50-9.80
 Lean Clay: Gray-black, taupe,
blue-gray, medium, medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot and a small amount
of shell, partially sandwiched with thin
sand layer

1
1.50

2
3.00
=13.0
3.00-3.30 (1)3.45
2021.05.08

-2.22 4.50 4.50 3

Lean Clay: Gray-black, taupe, 4.50
blue-gray, soft, soft to medium dry
strength, low to toughness, containing
dark organic spot and a small amount
11 of shell.

-3.72 6.00 1.50 4

Silty Sand (SM): Gray-brown, 6.00
blue-gray, the main mineral =2.0
composition of sand is quartz, 6.00-6.30
feldspar, well sorted, poorly grade,
mainly sub-angular and sub-circular,
most of the clay content is less than
15%, saturated, dense, the local phase
changes into fine sand containing
cohesive soil
=24.0
5 7.50-7.80
3 f 8.00

=8.0
9.00-9.30

6 =7.0
-7.72 10.00 4.00 9.80 9.50-9.80
Appendix-C In-situ Test Results
 Soil Resistivity Test Results

Borehole Coordinate and Elevation Measuring Resistivity Surface

No. E(m) N(m) H(m) Depth(m) (Ω•m) Condition
1 3.87
2 4.33
OH01 787367.780 3431303.230 4.02 3 6.45 Dry
4 3.42
5 2.34
1 5.23
2 3.45
OH03 787380.190 3427193.860 3.30 3 4.33 Dry
4 5.88
5 3.23
1 4.33
2 3.42
OH05 787453.430 3422705.990 2.38 3 5.21 Dry
4 5.89
5 6.23
1 8.99
2 8.80
0H07 783401.370 3422948.174 1.77 3 7.21 Dry
4 4.27
5 4.89
1 10.05
2 8.82
0H09 780414.000 3420956.000 1.50 3 9.42 Dry
4 7.39
5 9.31
1 9.22
2 6.28
OH11 777600.160 3419627.759 0.20 3 6.28 Dry
4 6.81
5 16.33
Borehole Coordinate and Elevation Measuring Resistivity Surface
No. E(m) N(m) H(m) Depth(m) (Ω•m) Condition
1 22.61
2 7.90
OH14 777817.260 3413230.229 0.33 3 8.32 Dry
4 7.49
5 3.92
1 9.42
2 8.32
OH16 777735.970 3409155.937 0.61 3 11.02 Dry
4 12.56
5 9.08
1 9.29
2 8.11
OH19 777469.480 3403266.209 2.18 3 10.21 Dry
4 9.23
5 7.90
1 8.99
2 9.01
OH22 771527.800 3403276.713 1.74 3 9.33 Dry
4 10.23
5 10.98
1 7.89
2 9.82
OH24 767758.250 3402090.106 1.84 3 7.89 Dry
4 6.77
5 8.99
1 3.92
2 10.23
OH26 764017.890 3400200.812 2.28 3 9.83 Dry
4 7.65
5 7.66
 Table of SPT Results
Layer Borehole Test SPT
Number Layer Name Remark
No. No. Depth(m) Count(/30cm)

1 ① Lean Clay OH01 3.00-3.30 2

2 ② Lean silty Clay OH01 6.00-6.30 4

3 ② Lean silty Clay OH01 9.50-9.80 2

4 ① Lean Clay OH02 3.00-3.30 3

5 ② Lean silty Clay OH02 6.00-6.30 2

6 ② Lean silty Clay OH02 9.50-9.80 2

7 ① Lean Clay OH03 1.50-1.80 4

8 ② Lean silty Clay OH03 4.50-4.80 2

9 ② Lean silty Clay OH03 8.00-8.30 2

10 ② Lean silty Clay OH03 9.50-9.80 2

11 ① Lean Clay OH04 3.00-3.30 2

12 ② Lean silty Clay OH04 6.00-6.30 4

13 ② Lean silty Clay OH04 8.00-8.30 2

14 ② Lean silty Clay OH04 9.50-9.80 2

15 ① Lean Clay OH05 1.00-1.30 2

16 ①1 Lean Clay OH05 5.00-5.30 5

17 ② Lean silty Clay OH05 8.00-8.30 2

18 ② Lean silty Clay OH05 9.50-9.80 3

19 ② Lean silty Clay OH06 3.00-3.30 2

20 ② Lean silty Clay OH06 6.00-6.30 2

21 ② Lean silty Clay OH06 8.00-8.30 2

22 ② Lean silty Clay OH06 9.50-9.80 2

23 ① Lean Clay OH07 1.00-1.30 4

24 ② Lean silty Clay OH07 4.50-4.80 2

25 ② Lean silty Clay OH07 8.00-8.30 2

26 ② Lean silty Clay OH07 9.50-9.80 2

27 ② Lean silty Clay OH08 3.00-3.30 2

28 ③ Silty Sand OH08 6.00-6.30 2

29 ③ Silty Sand OH08 8.00-8.30 24

30 ③ Silty Sand OH08 9.50-9.80 27

31 ① Lean Clay OH09 3.00-3.30 2

32 ② Lean silty Clay OH09 6.00-6.30 4

33 ② Lean silty Clay OH09 8.00-8.30 2

 Layer Borehole Test SPT
Number Layer Name Remark
No. No. Depth(m) Count(/30cm)
34 ② Lean silty Clay OH09 9.50-9.80 2

35 ① Lean Clay OH10 3.00-3.30 4

36 ② Lean silty Clay OH10 6.00-6.30 2

37 ② Lean silty Clay OH10 8.00-8.30 2

38 ② Lean silty Clay OH10 9.50-9.80 2

39 ① Lean Clay OH11 1.50-1.80 4

40 ② Lean silty Clay OH11 4.50-4.80 2

41 ② Lean silty Clay OH11 8.00-8.30 2

42 ② Lean silty Clay OH11 9.50-9.80 2

43 ① Lean Clay OH12 3.00-3.30 3

44 ② Lean silty Clay OH12 6.00-6.30 8

45 ② Lean silty Clay OH12 8.00-8.30 2

46 ② Lean silty Clay OH12 9.50-9.80 2

47 ① Lean Clay OH13 3.00-3.30 3

48 ② Lean silty Clay OH13 6.00-6.30 2

49 ② Lean silty Clay OH13 8.00-8.30 2

50 ② Lean silty Clay OH13 9.50-9.80 2

51 ② Lean silty Clay OH14 3.00-3.30 10

52 ② Lean silty Clay OH14 4.50-4.80 2

53 ② Lean silty Clay OH14 6.00-6.30 2

54 ② Lean silty Clay OH14 8.00-8.30 2

55 ② Lean silty Clay OH14 9.50-9.80 2

56 ①1 Lean Clay OH15 3.00-3.30 9

57 ② Lean silty Clay OH15 6.00-6.30 3

58 ② Lean silty Clay OH15 8.00-8.30 3

59 ② Lean silty Clay OH15 9.50-9.80 3

60 ①1 Lean Clay OH16 3.00-3.30 2

61 ② Lean silty Clay OH16 6.00-6.30 4

62 ② Lean silty Clay OH16 8.00-8.30 4

63 ② Lean silty Clay OH16 9.50-9.80 7

64 ① Lean Clay OH17 1.00-1.30 2

65 ② Lean silty Clay OH17 4.00-4.30 2

66 ② Lean silty Clay OH17 8.00-8.30 4

67 ② Lean silty Clay OH17 9.50-9.80 3
 Layer Borehole Test SPT
Number Layer Name Remark
No. No. Depth(m) Count(/30cm)
68 ①1-1 Lean Clay with sand OH18 3.00-3.30 3

69 ② Lean silty Clay OH18 6.00-6.30 2

70 ② Lean silty Clay OH18 8.00-8.30 2

71 ② Lean silty Clay OH18 9.50-9.80 3

72 ① Lean Clay OH19 3.00-3.30 6

73 ② Lean silty Clay OH19 6.00-6.30 17

74 ② Lean silty Clay OH19 8.00-8.30 2

75 ② Lean silty Clay OH19 9.50-9.80 2

76 ①1 Lean Clay OH20 3.00-3.30 6

77 ①1-1 Lean Clay with sand OH20 6.00-6.30 2

78 ② Lean silty Clay OH20 8.00-8.30 12

79 ② Lean silty Clay OH20 9.50-9.80 2

80 ① Lean Clay OH21 1.50-1.80 9

81 ② Lean silty Clay OH21 6.00-6.30 19

82 ② Lean silty Clay OH21 8.00-8.30 2

83 ② Lean silty Clay OH21 9.50-9.80 2

84 ① Lean Clay OH22 3.00-3.30 12

85 ② Lean silty Clay OH22 6.00-6.30 2

86 ②1 Lean Clay OH22 8.00-8.30 2

87 ②1 Lean Clay OH22 9.50-9.80 5

88 ① Lean Clay OH23 3.00-3.30 19

89 ②1 Lean Clay OH23 6.00-6.30 3

90 ②1 Lean Clay OH23 8.00-8.30 12

91 ②1 Lean Clay OH23 9.50-9.80 6

92 ① Lean Clay OH24 3.00-3.30 5

93 ①1-1 Lean Clay with sand OH24 6.00-6.30 4

94 ③ Silty Sand OH24 8.00-8.30 9

95 ③ Silty Sand OH24 9.50-9.80 5

96 ① Lean Clay OH25 3.00-3.30 15

97 ①1 Lean Clay OH25 6.00-6.30 2

98 ②1 Lean Clay OH25 7.50-7.80 2

99 ③ Silty Sand OH25 9.00-9.30 4

100 ③ Silty Sand OH25 9.50-9.80 12

101 ① Lean Clay OH26 3.00-3.30 13
 Layer Borehole Test SPT
Number Layer Name Remark
No. No. Depth(m) Count(/30cm)
102 ③ Silty Sand OH26 6.00-6.30 2

103 ③ Silty Sand OH26 7.50-7.80 24

104 ③ Silty Sand OH26 9.00-9.30 8

105 ③ Silty Sand OH26 9.50-9.80 7
Appendix-D Laboratory Test Results
 Direct Shear Tes Chemical Test
Natural Natural
Sampling Natural Specific Gravity Liquid Plasticit Plasticity Liquid Penetratio
Borehole Moisture Porosity

UCT
Depth Density Gravity Density Limit y Limit Index Index Friction Consolidation n Test
NO. Content Ratio Cohesion
(m) ρ Gs γ wL wP IP IL Angle k SO4 CL TSS Org. PH USCS
w e Cq
φq

Cv Pc
- m g/cm3 % - kN/m3 - % % - - ° kPa kN/m2 Cc Cr 2 m/s % % % %
(m /min) Kpa
OH01-1 1.50-1.70 1.94 16.3 19.4 45 20 25.00 -0.15 12 24 168 CL
OH01-2 3.00-3.20 2.67 41 22 19.00 0.26 0.21 1.34 3.23 7.95 CL
OH01-3 4.50-4.70 2.01 18.4 20.1 0.432 42 26 16.00 -0.48 155 0.14 0.0034 1.24E-04 97 1.20E-07 CL
OH01-4 6.00-6.20 2.62 37 21 16.00 CL
OH01-5 8.00-8.20 44 24 20.00 5 14 CL
OH01-6 9.80-10.00 2.68 34 21 13.00 CL
OH02-1 1.50-1.70 1.90 20.2 2.68 19.0 0.408 40.6 11.8 28.80 0.29 107 0.16 3.00E-02 1.33E-04 83 2.07E-07 0.23 0.31 2.4 2.4 8.35 CL
OH02-2 3.00-3.20 57 20 37.00 4 42 CH
OH02-3 4.50-4.70 2.08 19.2 2.69 20.8 0.668 50 23.8 26.20 -0.18 124 0.15 3.00E-02 1.05E-04 108 1.80E-07 0.37 0.29 2.6 3.1 8.22 CH
OH02-4 6.00-6.20 CL
OH02-5 8.00-8.20 45 24 21.00 3 18 CL
OH02-6 9.80-10.00 44 21 23.00 CL
OH03-1 1.50-1.70 6 32 CL
OH03-2 3.00-3.20 1.94 22 2.67 19.43 45 22 23.00 0.00 79 0.43 0.37 2.11 1.76 8.13 CL
OH03-3 4.50-4.70 3 18 CL
OH03-4 6.00-6.20 1.99 20.5 2.66 19.86 0.82 46 23 23.00 -0.11 0.23 4.60E-02 2.05E-04 89 1.68E-07 CL
OH03-5 8.00-8.20 2.67 5 14 CL
OH03-6 9.80-10.00 22 2.68 38 21 17.00 0.06 3 11 CL
OH04-1 1.50-1.70 1.85 15.5 2.71 18.5 0.6 36.2 15 21.20 0.02 90 0.2 0.028 3.77E-05 89 6.80E-08 0.38 0.25 2.55 2.2 8.43 CL
OH04-2 3.00-3.20 40 17.3 22.70 CL
OH04-3 4.50-4.70 1.91 20.4 2.71 19.12 0.566 44 19 25.00 0.06 5 37 69 0.13 0.024 1.08E-05 113 9.40E-09 0.43 0.28 2.43 2.8 8.35 CL
OH04-4 6.00-6.20 CL
OH04-5 8.00-8.20 22.5 38 21 17.00 0.09 2 14 CL
OH04-6 9.80-10.00 CL
OH05-1 1.00-1.20 46 23 23.00 0.41 0.32 1.93 1.11 8.03 CL
OH05-2 2.50-2.70 1.93 19.54 2.68 19.34 0.67 5 36 0.26 0.0413 9.40E-04 88 4.3E-08 CL
OH05-3 5.00-5.20 43 19 24.00 CL
OH05-4 6.50-6.70 1.95 20.45 2.69 19.45 0.59 4 11 0.25 0.023 2.40E-05 90 5.8E-09 CL
OH05-5 8.00-8.20 44 20 24.00 0.38 0.29 1.03 0.89 7.93 CL
OH05-6 9.80-10.00 21.6 2.67 CL
OH06-1 1.50-1.70 1.81 19.3 2.69 18.1 0.703 40 18.7 21.30 0.03 109 0.15 0.028 1.30E-04 180 1.10E-07 0.31 0.32 2.51 1.8 7.9 CL
OH06-2 3.00-3.20 44 21 23.00 3 27 CL
OH06-3 4.50-4.70 1.98 20.5 19.8 1.04 33 16 17.00 0.26 78 0.31 0.058 2.12E-05 130 6.20E-08 0.41 0.37 2.43 1.2 8.2 CL
OH06-4 6.00-6.20 2.66
 Direct Shear Tes Chemical Test
Natural Natural
Sampling Natural Specific Gravity Liquid Plasticit Plasticity Liquid Penetratio
Borehole Moisture Porosity

UCT
Depth Density Gravity Density Limit y Limit Index Index Friction Consolidation n Test
NO. Content Ratio Cohesion
(m) ρ Gs γ wL wP IP IL Angle k SO4 CL TSS Org. PH USCS
w e Cq
φq

Cv Pc
- m g/cm3 % - kN/m3 - % % - - ° kPa kN/m2 Cc Cr 2 m/s % % % %
(m /min) Kpa
OH06-5 8.00-8.20 22 38 18 20.00 0.20 4 11 CL
OH06-6 9.80-10.00
OH07-1 1.00-1.20 17 2.67 44 22 22.00 -0.23 0.32 0.29 1.72 0.93 8.12 CL
OH07-2 3.00-3.20 1.95 18 2.66 19.49 0.89 38 18 20.00 0.00 56 0.25 0.043 4.33E-05 78 5.14E-07 0.409 0.31 4.34 0.7 7.93 CL
OH07-3 4.50-4.70 22 2.65 45 20 25.00 0.08 6 20 CL
OH07-4 6.50-6.70 1.91 21 2.68 19.14 0.72 44 18 26.00 0.12 43 0.19 0.011 5.40E-05 98 4.00E-07 CL
OH07-5 8.00-8.20 22 2.66 31 22 9.00 0.00 4 18 CL
OH07-6 9.80-10.00 20 36 21 15.00 -0.07 CL
OH08-1 1.50-1.70 2.00 18.6 2.67 20.0 1.07 43.0 20.0 23.00 -0.06 187 0.27 0.03 1.05E-04 100 2.00E-07 0.39 0.26 2.0 0.87 8.34 CL
OH08-2 3.00-3.20 CL
OH08-3 4.50-4.70 1.82 2.7 18.2 0.779 50.6 33.3 17.30 -1.92 4 43 144 0.24 0.027 1.16E-05 105 2.80E-07 0.3 0.31 2.13 1.87 8.11 MH
OH08-4 6.00-6.20 29.0 14.3 14.70 -0.97 CL
OH08-5 8.00-8.20 2.69 SM
OH08-6 9.80-10.00 SM
OH09-1 1.50-1.70 1.99 18.4 2.68 19.9 0.691 45 19 26.00 -0.02 143 0.19 0.02 4.30E-05 60 5.6E-07 0.405 0.34 10.34 1.23 7.94 CL
OH09-2 3.00-3.20 19.54 44 21 23.00 -0.06 8 34 CL
OH09-3 4.50-4.70 1.98 20.65 2.68 19.8 0.76 94 0.34 0.029 5.80E-05 87 1.9E-07 0.41 0.311 3.11 2.1 7.76
OH09-4 6.00-6.20 41 22 19.00 -1.16 CL
OH09-5 8.00-8.20 21.6 2.67 3 21
OH09-6 9.80-10.00 38 17 21.00 -0.81 CL
OH10-1 1.50-1.70 2.02 19.6 2.7 20.2 0.668 167 0.12 0.03 1.33E-05 110 6.20E-08 0.49 0.316 1.76 1.4 8.32
OH10-2 3.00-3.20 44.3 23.1 21.20 -1.09 CL
OH10-3 4.50-4.70 1.85 23.6 2.7 18.5 0.703 67 0.18 0.028 1.15E-04 99 1.10E-07 0.54 0.305 2.13 1.54 8.12
OH10-4 6.00-6.20 39 21 18.00 -1.17 7 28 CL
OH10-5 8.00-8.20 22.8 2.68
OH10-6 9.80-10.00 38 10.5 27.50 -0.38 CL
OH11-1 1.50-1.70 18.4 4 31 0.37 0.22 1.3 0.86 7.93
OH11-2 3.00-3.20 2.05 2.68 20.54 0.785 48 23 25.00 -0.92 112 0.22 0.027 3.40E-05 90 4.30E-07 CL
OH11-3 4.50-4.70 21.54 6 26
OH11-4 6.00-6.20 1.95 2.66 19.45 49 25 24.00 -1.04 55 CL
OH11-5 8.00-8.20 22.5 3 17
OH11-6 9.80-10.00 36 15 21.00 -0.71 CL
OH12-1 1.50-1.70 2.11 12.3 2.69 21.1 0.65 45 21 24.00 -0.36 97 0.13 0.03 2.60E-05 67 2.70E-07 0.39 0.31 0.87 2.1 8.12 CL
OH12-2 3.00-3.20
 Direct Shear Tes Chemical Test
Natural Natural
Sampling Natural Specific Gravity Liquid Plasticit Plasticity Liquid Penetratio
Borehole Moisture Porosity

UCT
Depth Density Gravity Density Limit y Limit Index Index Friction Consolidation n Test
NO. Content Ratio Cohesion
(m) ρ Gs γ wL wP IP IL Angle k SO4 CL TSS Org. PH USCS
w e Cq
φq

Cv Pc
- m g/cm3 % - kN/m3 - % % - - ° kPa kN/m2 Cc Cr 2 m/s % % % %
(m /min) Kpa
OH12-3 4.50-4.70 11.1 2.65 0.59 35.2 23.1 12.10 -0.99 4 37 59 0.14 0.028 1.16E-05 98 2.40E-07 0.42 0.27 1.5 0.5 8.09 CL
OH12-4 6.00-6.20 38.5 16.7 21.80 -0.77 CL
OH12-5 8.00-8.20 3 18
OH12-6 9.80-10.00
OH13-1 1.50-1.70 2.02 16.0 2.65 20.2 41.0 22.0 19.00 -0.32 88.0 CL
OH13-2 3.00-3.20 21.0 5.0 33.0 0.34 0.23 0.95 1.40 7.95
OH13-3 4.50-4.70 1.95 2.68 19.5 0.9 45.0 23.0 22.00 0.22 0.019 5.61E-05 87.00 1.90E-07 CL
OH13-4 6.00-6.20 22.0 4.0 25.0
OH13-5 8.00-8.20 39.0 18.0 21.00 CL
OH13-6 9.80-10.00 21.0
OH14-1 1.50-1.70 17.2 2.64 0.667 50 26.9 23.10 -0.42 98 0.19 0.029 2.12E-05 150 2.00E-07 0.35 0.33 1.54 1.67 8.35 CH
OH14-2 3.00-3.20 3 39
OH14-3 4.50-4.70 1.97 23.2 2.7 19.7 43 23.4 19.60 -0.01 0.41 0.28 2.14 1.3 8.32 CL
OH14-4 6.00-6.20
OH14-5 8.00-8.20 37 22 15.00 CL
OH14-6 9.80-10.00
OH15-1 1.50-1.70 1.94 11 19.4 39 18 21.00 -0.33 CL
OH15-2 3.00-3.20 18 2.67 18 5 SC
OH15-3 4.50-4.70 2.03 20.3 0.87 41 17 24.00 0.21 0.017 0.000065 87 2.6E-07 0.38 0.23 1.32 0.32 7.98 CL
OH15-4 6.00-6.20 22 2.64 3 31
OH15-5 8.00-8.20 37 21 16.00 CL
OH15-6 9.80-10.00
OH16-1 1.50-1.70 1.98 10.3 2.71 19.8 0.554 96.4 0.16 0.027 1.32E-04 120 2.10E-07 0.42 0.31 1.43 0.14 8.34
OH16-2 3.00-3.20
OH16-3 4.50-4.70 2.71 0.55 51.3 26.3 25.00 80.7 0.18 0.028 1.16E-05 125 2.10E-07 0.37 0.28 2.12 3.32 8.32 CH
OH16-4 6.00-6.20 28.3 15.4 12.90 4 33 CL
OH16-5 8.00-8.20 30.3 16.7 13.60 CL
OH16-6 9.80-10.00
OH17-1 1.00-1.20 2.76 45 21 24.00 5 39 CL
OH17-2 2.50-2.70 1.95 18.43 19.52 0.67 58 0.19 0.026 4.50E-05 87 4.70E-06
OH17-3 4.00-4.20 2.63 42 20 22.00 CL
OH17-4 6.00-6.20 2.03 22.65 20.3 39 0.38 0.25 1.98 0.67 7.76
OH17-5 8.00-8.20 38 16 22.00 4 24 CL
OH17-6 9.80-10.00
 Direct Shear Tes Chemical Test
Natural Natural
Sampling Natural Specific Gravity Liquid Plasticit Plasticity Liquid Penetratio
Borehole Moisture Porosity

UCT
Depth Density Gravity Density Limit y Limit Index Index Friction Consolidation n Test
NO. Content Ratio Cohesion
(m) ρ Gs γ wL wP IP IL Angle k SO4 CL TSS Org. PH USCS
w e Cq
φq

Cv Pc
- m g/cm3 % - kN/m3 - % % - - ° kPa kN/m2 Cc Cr 2 m/s % % % %
(m /min) Kpa
OH18-1 1.50-1.70 2.65 0.668 66.2 0.16 2.54E-02 1.15E-04 90 1.80E-07 0.24 0.24 3.21 3.21 8.23
OH18-2 3.00-3.20 1.94 19.4 41.3 11.1 30.20 CL
OH18-3 4.50-4.70 21.9 35.5 16 19.50 0.30 6 31 30.4 0.33 0.35 2.65 3.67 8.32 CL
OH18-4 6.00-6.20 2.7
OH18-5 8.00-8.20
OH18-6 9.80-10.00 36 27 9.00 ML
OH19-1 1.50-1.70 1.97 18.44 2.67 19.7 38 17 21.00 0.07 98 CL
OH19-2 3.00-3.20 0.34 0.29 4.76 1.08 8.21
OH19-3 4.50-4.70 2.02 20.2 0.763 44 21 23.00 69 0.22 0.021 4.30E-05 110 6.50E-07 CL
OH19-4 6.00-6.20 SM
OH19-5 8.00-8.20 21.21 6 19 0.41 0.31 1.14 0.23 7.79
OH19-6 9.80-10.00 36 27 9.00 ML
OH20-1 1.50-1.70 1.91 2.67 19.1 0.5556 37.2 23.1 14.10 28.2 0.18 0.028 2.12E-05 76 2.40E-07 0.54 0.29 1.32 1.32 8.23 CL
OH20-2 3.00-3.20
OH20-3 4.50-4.70 23.1 2.68 0.558 48 26.3 21.70 -0.15 3 38 33.4 0.16 0.022 1.33E-04 88 2.10E-07 0.53 0.32 2.36 0.9 8.32 CL
OH20-4 6.00-6.20
OH20-5 8.00-8.20 23 SM
OH20-6 9.80-10.00
OH21-1 1.50-1.70 11 7 38
OH21-2 3.00-3.20 1.97 19.6 19.65 45 22 23.00 -0.10 0.45 0.311 1.65 0.54 7.98 CL
OH21-3 4.50-4.70 2.00 20.5 2.68 19.99 0.76 44 21 23.00 -0.02 49 0.22 0.012 4.30E-05 89 9.80E-07 CL
OH21-4 6.00-6.20 20.87 SM
OH21-5 8.00-8.20 2.66 3 18 0.41 0.28 1.77 1.03 8.12
OH21-6 9.80-10.00 37 26 11.00 ML
OH22-1 1.50-1.70 1.95 19 2.69 19.5 0.71 45 21 24.00 -0.08 110 0.16 0.026 2.60E-05 98 2.30E-07 0.45 0.28 1.65 2.87 8.12 CL
OH22-2 3.00-3.20 7 30
OH22-3 4.50-4.70 21.4 2.7 0.68 49 26 23.00 -0.20 65 0.19 0.027 2.90E-05 110 2.40E-07 0.34 0.26 0.76 3.32 8.01 CL
OH22-4 6.00-6.20
OH22-5 8.00-8.20 20.3 7 13.30 CL
OH22-6 9.80-10.00
OH23-1 1.50-1.70 1.91 18.5 2.67 19.1 44 19 25.00 -0.02 89 CL
OH23-2 3.00-3.20 11 36 0.41 0.32 1.84 1.22 7.94
OH23-3 4.50-4.70 1.97 20.3 2.66 19.7 0.89 45 22 23.00 -0.07 0.24 0.019 3.30E-05 93 5.80E-06 CL
OH23-4 6.00-6.20
 Direct Shear Tes Chemical Test
Natural Natural
Sampling Natural Specific Gravity Liquid Plasticit Plasticity Liquid Penetratio
Borehole Moisture Porosity

UCT
Depth Density Gravity Density Limit y Limit Index Index Friction Consolidation n Test
NO. Content Ratio Cohesion
(m) ρ Gs γ wL wP IP IL Angle k SO4 CL TSS Org. PH USCS
w e Cq
φq

Cv Pc
- m g/cm3 % - kN/m3 - % % - - ° kPa kN/m2 Cc Cr 2 m/s % % % %
(m /min) Kpa
OH23-5 8.00-8.20 35 18 17.00 4 28 CL
OH23-6 9.80-10.00
OH24-1 1.50-1.70 2.01 12.3 2.71 20.1 0.58 45.8 23.1 22.70 -0.48 188 0.18 0.028 2.70E-05 130 1.90E-07 0.34 0.27 1.98 1.55 8.34 CL
OH24-2 3.00-3.20
OH24-3 4.50-4.70 2.72 0.63 48.4 14.3 34.10 8 32 109 0.19 0.029 2.70E-05 125 2.10E-07 0.446 0.29 0.76 2.98 8.32 CL
OH24-4 6.00-6.20 18.5
OH24-5 8.00-8.20
OH24-6 9.80-10.00 SM
OH25-1 1.50-1.70 1.94 13 19.4 109
OH25-2 3.00-3.20 18 43 23 20.00 -0.25 6 38 0.392 0.28 0.33 1.93 7.93 CL
OH25-3 4.50-4.70 1.98 21 2.67 19.8 1.1 0.21 0.032 3.40E-05 76 1.80E-07
OH25-4 6.00-6.20 39 20 19.00 4 29 CL
OH25-5 7.50-7.70 23
OH25-6 9.00-9.20 SM
OH26-1 1.50-1.70 2.71 0.65 102 0.19 0.03 2.12E-05 150 1.80E-07 0.43 0.27 6.43 2.21 8.12
OH26-2 3.00-3.20 36.5 23.5 13.00 CL
OH26-3 4.50-4.70 1.93 27.2 2.7 19.3 0.552 50 21.1 28.90 0.21 4 40 0.18 0.028 1.33E-04 140 1.90E-07 0.404 0.29 6.8 3.31 8.21 CH
OH26-4 6.00-6.20
OH26-5 8.00-8.20 22 3 SM