Philosophical Perspectives on Empathy Theoretical

Approaches and Emerging Challenges 1st Edition Derek

Matravers pdf version

Order now at ebookfinal.com

https://ebookfinal.com/download/philosophical-perspectives-on-
empathy-theoretical-approaches-and-emerging-challenges-1st-edition-
derek-matravers/

★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (84 reviews )

Access PDF Now

Philosophical Perspectives on Empathy Theoretical Approaches
and Emerging Challenges 1st Edition Derek Matravers Pdf
Download

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library

Here are some recommended products for you. Click the link to
download, or explore more at ebookfinal

Models of Communication Theoretical and Philosophical

Approaches 1st Edition Mats Bergman

https://ebookfinal.com/download/models-of-communication-theoretical-
and-philosophical-approaches-1st-edition-mats-bergman/

Emerging Perspectives on Substance Misuse 1st Edition

Willm Mistral

https://ebookfinal.com/download/emerging-perspectives-on-substance-
misuse-1st-edition-willm-mistral/

Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment 2nd Edition

Gertrude Ezorsky (Ed.)

https://ebookfinal.com/download/philosophical-perspectives-on-
punishment-2nd-edition-gertrude-ezorsky-ed/

Health Insurance Issues Challenges and Perspectives Issues

Challenges and Perspectives 1st Edition Edvard Abrahamsen

https://ebookfinal.com/download/health-insurance-issues-challenges-
and-perspectives-issues-challenges-and-perspectives-1st-edition-
edvard-abrahamsen/
Mental Mechanisms Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive
Neuroscience 1st Edition William Bechtel

https://ebookfinal.com/download/mental-mechanisms-philosophical-
perspectives-on-cognitive-neuroscience-1st-edition-william-bechtel/

Philosophical Approaches to Communication 1st Edition

Claude Mangion

https://ebookfinal.com/download/philosophical-approaches-to-
communication-1st-edition-claude-mangion/

Communication and Mental Illness Theoretical and Practical

Approaches 1st Edition Jenny France

https://ebookfinal.com/download/communication-and-mental-illness-
theoretical-and-practical-approaches-1st-edition-jenny-france/

Challenges in Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2nd edition Derek

Jewell

https://ebookfinal.com/download/challenges-in-inflammatory-bowel-
disease-2nd-edition-derek-jewell/

Humanistic Approaches to Multiculturalism and Diversity

Perspectives on Existence and Difference 1st Edition Louis
Hoffman
https://ebookfinal.com/download/humanistic-approaches-to-
multiculturalism-and-diversity-perspectives-on-existence-and-
difference-1st-edition-louis-hoffman/
Philosophical Perspectives on Empathy Theoretical
Approaches and Emerging Challenges 1st Edition Derek
Matravers Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Derek Matravers, Anik Waldow
ISBN(s): 9781138584334, 1138584339
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 1.22 MB
Year: 2018
Language: english
Philosophical Perspectives
on Empathy

Empathy—our capacity to cognitively or affectively connect with other

people’s thoughts and feelings—is a concept whose definition and meaning
varies widely within philosophy and other disciplines. Philosophical
Perspectives on Empathy aims to advance research on the nature and
function of empathy by exploring and challenging different theoretical
approaches to this phenomenon.
The first section of the book explores empathy as a historiographical
method, presenting a number of rich and interesting arguments that have
influenced the debate from the Nineteenth Century to the present day. The
next group of essays broadly accepts the centrality of perspective taking in
empathy. Here the authors attempt to refine and improve this particular
conception of empathy by clarifying the intentionality of the perspective
taker’s emotion, the perspective taker’s meta-cognitive capacities, and the
nature of central imagining itself. Finally, the concluding section argues
for the re-evaluation, or even rejection, of empathy. These essays advance
alternative theories that are relevant to current debates, such as narrative
engagement and competence, attunement or the sharing of mental states,
and the ‘second-person’ model of empathy.
This book features a wide range of perspectives on empathy written by
experts across several different areas of philosophy. It will be of interest
to researchers and upper-level students working on the philosophy of
emotions across ethics, philosophy of mind, philosophy of psychology,
and the history of philosophy.

Derek Matravers is Professor of Philosophy at The Open University. His recent

work includes Introducing Philosophy of Art: Eight Case Studies (Routledge,
2013); Fiction and Narrative (OUP, 2014); and Empathy (2017). He directs,
along with Helen Frowe, the AHRC-funded project Heritage in War.

Anik Waldow is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of

Sydney. She has published articles on sympathy, the role of affect in the
formation of the self and associationist theories of thought and language.
She is the author of Hume and the Problem of Other Minds (2009). She has
an Australian Research Council Discovery Project on the ‘Experimental
Self’ and the role of embodiment in cognition.
Routledge Studies in Ethics and Moral Theory

Welfare, Meaning and Worth

Aaron Smuts

Moral Skepticism
New Essays
Edited by Diego E. Machuca

Explaining Right and Wrong

A New Moral Pluralism and Its Implication
Benjamin Sachs

Determined by Reasons
A Competence Account of Acting for a Normative Reason
Susanne Mantel

Ethics and Self-Cultivation

Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
Edited by Matthew Dennis and Sander Werkhoven

Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences

Thomas Pölzler

Moral Evil in Practical Ethics

Edited by Shlomit Harrosh and Roger Crisp

Kant and Parfit

The Groundwork of Morals
Husain Sarkar

Philosophical Perspectives on Empathy

Theoretical Approaches and Emerging Challenges
Edited by Derek Matravers and Anik Waldow

For more information about this series, please visit: www.routledge.com

Philosophical Perspectives
on Empathy
Theoretical Approaches and
Emerging Challenges

Edited by Derek Matravers and

Anik Waldow
First published 2019
by Routledge
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
and by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2019 Taylor & Francis
The right of the editors to be identified as the authors of the editorial
material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been
asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced
or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means,
now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording,
or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in
writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation
without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book has been requested
ISBN: 978-1-138-58433-4 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-0-429-50609-3 (ebk)
Typeset in Sabon
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
Contents

Acknowledgements vii

1 Introduction 1
D E R E K M ATRAVE RS A N D A N IK WAL DO W

PART I
Empathy as a Method 11

2 Empathy: Affect, Language and Cognition in the

Discovery of the Past 13
A N I K WA L D O W

3 Emotional Engagement in Scientific Biographies 28

NICK JARDINE

PART II
Empathy and Perspective Taking 43

4 Empathy, Mentalization and Meta-Reflective Capacities 45

E L I S A G A L G UT

5 The Object of an Empathetic Emotion 60

D E R E K M ATRAVE RS

6 What Can We Learn From Taking Another’s Perspective? 74

H E I D I L . M A IB O M
vi Contents
7 Sympathy and Projection, and Why We Should Be Wary
of Empathy 91
L O U I S E B R A DDO CK

PART III
Challenges to Empathy 109

8 Exploring Enactive Empathy: Actively Responding to

and Understanding Others 111
D A N I E L D . H UTTO AN D A L AN JURGE N S

9 Understanding Individual Agency: How Empathy and

Narrative Competence Cooperate 129
K A R S TE N R . STUE B E R

10 Empathy Without Sharing: Empathetic Responsiveness

in Psychoanalysis and Politics 144
K ATE A B R A MSO N A N D A DAM L E ITE

11 An Imaginative-Associative Account of Affective Empathy 167

TA L I A M O R AG

List of Contributors 185

Index 188
Acknowledgements

The research that led to the publication of this volume was supported
through the British Academy Leverhulme Small Grant Scheme and the
research support schemes of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences and
the School for Philosophical and Historical Inquiry of the University of
Sydney. Many of the chapters in this volume were developed in com-
munication with the group members of the Interdisciplinary Network
on Sympathy, Empathy and the Imagination and we would especially
like to thank Louise Gyler, Maarten Steenhagen, Holly High, Katherine
Harloe and Riana Betzler for their inspiring inputs and discussions as
well as our invited guest speakers and audiences in Cambridge, Oxford,
Sydney and Bloomington. We are also grateful for the financial sup-
port of the Intellectual History Network of the University of Sydney and
the Institute for Advanced Studies at Indiana University, Bloomington,
through which two of the group meetings could be financed. St. John’s
College generously supported our workshop meetings at Oxford, and
the Department of the History and Philosophy of Science supported our
workshop meeting in Cambridge.
1 Introduction
Derek Matravers and Anik Waldow

1. Empathy
Within philosophy, discussions of empathy can be found in (at least) the
philosophy of mind (the ‘mindreading’ debate); the philosophy of the emo-
tions; moral theory; and the philosophy of psychoanalysis. Despite the
intensity of debates over recent years, we do not seem to be converging on
an agreed view on either the nature of, or the importance of, the concept.
Indeed, not much seems to have changed since Dominic Lopes wrote that
‘experts characterize what they call “empathy” in several incompatible
ways, and perhaps the definitions glom onto distinct phenomena, none of
which has the sole claim to the title of “empathy”’ (Lopes 2011). There
are, however, certain features that are commonly held to be part of the
mix such as imagining oneself in another’s situation (or imagining being
another in the other’s situation) and replicating another’s mental state.
The essays in the collection reveal a growing concern, among some from
a variety of backgrounds, to shift the balance away from this towards
some broader conception. However, as is also clear, there are those that
resist this shift of focus.
The history of the concept is well known to those who work in the
area, at least in outline. As the standard narrative goes, the term came
to prominence in discussions in German aesthetics in the late nineteenth
century (as Einfühlung).1 However, what is less well known is that the
transition from the British context, where Hume and Smith argued for the
aesthetic and moral importance of sympathy in the eighteenth century, to
the German interest in Einfühlung as an aesthetic category, was crucially
influenced by Herder’s engagement with key aspects of Scottish sentimen-
talism. Following Hume and Smith, Herder used the term Einfühlung
to denote a process through which we can understand other persons’
thoughts and feelings, and made this capacity central to his moral theory;
but he also considerably widened the focus of the debate when consider-
ing how sympathy figures in the more general endeavour of rendering the
world and other people intelligible to us (see Waldow’s contribution to
this volume). Thus, he argued that, in addition to its moral and aesthetic
2 Derek Matravers and Anik Waldow
functions, sympathy enables an understanding of language, historical as
well as cultural difference.
It is only when, in the late nineteenth century, the now-forgotten figure
Robert Vischer provided the first precise definition of Einfühlung and that
the question of how to make sense of an observer’s relation with objects in
which they had an aesthetic interest became particularly central. Vischer
wrote:

[The body] unconsciously projects its own bodily form—and with

this also the soul—into the form of the object. From this I derived the
notion that I call ‘empathy’ [Einfühlung].
(Vischer 1873, 92)

The term was then picked up by Theodor Lipps, who had a wide interest
in the many different functions of Einfühlung, and was also in his day a
prominent figure in discussions of aesthetics and the philosophy of art.
Crucially for the subsequent history of the term, Lipps applied the insights
from aesthetics to the philosophy of mind, thereby returning the debate
to issues that concerned Hume and Smith. Dissatisfied, with good reason,
with the traditional ‘argument from analogy’ for the existence of other
minds, Lipps took the idea of projecting ourselves into objects to develop
an account that argues for our non-inferential ability to grasp that others
are minded creatures:

In the perception and comprehension of certain sensory objects,

namely, those that we afterward represent as the body of another
individual (or generally as the sensory appearance of such), is imme-
diately grasped by us. This applies particularly to the perception and
comprehension of occurrences or changes in this sensory appearance,
which we name, for example, friendliness or sadness. This grasp hap-
pens immediately and simultaneously with the perception, and that
does not mean that we see it or apprehend it by means of the senses.
We cannot do that, since anger, friendliness, or sadness cannot be
perceived through the senses. We can only experience this kind of
thing in ourselves.
(Lipps 1907, 713) (Quoted in Jahoda 2005, 156;
translated by Jahoda)

The first discussions in the Anglophone world translated ‘Einfühlung’

as ‘infeeling’ (Anonymous 1908, 466). Then, in 1909, the American psy-
chologist Edward Titchener, in a brilliant linguistic stroke, coined the
term ‘empathy’ (Tichener 1909, 21–22). Anglophone discussion did not
immediately take up Lipps’s arguments about other minds, but focused
on empathy as a means to sort out what it is to take an aesthetic inter-
est in the world. In particular, Bernard Berenson, the great theorist of
 Introduction 3
Renaissance paintings, and his neighbour Vernon Lee, the amateur psy-
chologist of aesthetics, worked hard to discipline the Germans’ thoughts
into a coherent theory. Despite the initial excitement, interest in empathy
faded relatively quickly. There seem to have been a number of reasons
for this. The first was, as Vernon Lee herself argued, that the aesthetic
theory of empathy had, at its heart, a mystery—the notion of projection
(see Braddock’s contribution to this volume). What sense can be made of
the notion of the ego projecting itself into an object (Lee and Anstruther-
Thomson 1912)? In seeking to eradicate the mystery, the theory itself
transformed into something different. One of its successor theories sought
an account of how mental states get embodied in objects in the act of cre-
ation (expression theory), another simply ignored projection and focused
on those properties of art into which, it had been argued, our egos are
projected (formalism). Empathy, as an aesthetic theory, appeared dead.
Furthermore, philosophy at that time seemed not to have any use for
empathy as part of a theory of the mind (if, indeed, any sense could have
been made of Lipps’s work as a theory of the mind). Hence, with support
neither from philosophers of aesthetics nor philosophers of mind, the
term faded away.
Rather extraordinarily, the term then stayed dormant for around fifty
or sixty years. The German term had been used by Wilhelm Worringer as
the title of his 1907 book on artistic styles (Abstraktion und Einfühlung)
and it might have been the translation of that in 1953 (as Abstraction and
Empathy) that reintroduced the term into English discourse (Worringer
2014). From then, the term started to seep back into use, particularly
in academic psychology and philosophy. This time around the thread
that was picked up was related to Lipps’s concerns about our ability
to know what is going on in other people’s minds. In psychology work
was being done on a number of projects that involved imagining oneself
into the perspective of others (‘perspective taking’) including the sources
of altruism (Batson, Ahmad et al. 2012), developing a ‘theory of mind’
(Baron-Cohen, Leslie et al. 1985), and the nature of autism (Baron-Cohen
1995). During the 1980s, the concept seemed to be just what was needed
to advance a particular philosophical debate and it was pushed to centre
stage. The dominant post-war theory of how we understand each other
was, at least in the Anglophone world, some version of functionalism.
That is, the view that mental states are functions—they get inputs at the
one end (from our senses), interact with other mental states, and produce
outputs from the other end (our appearance and behaviour). We learn
what is going on in other’s minds by applying the theorems of an implicit
psychological theory such as ‘when someone is in so-and-so combina-
tion of mental states and receives sensory stimuli of so-and-so kind, he
tends with so-and-so probability to be caused thereby to go into so-and-
so mental states and produce so-and-so motor responses’ (Lewis 1972,
272). In the 1980s two philosophers, Jane Heal and Robert Gordon,
4 Derek Matravers and Anik Waldow
independently proposed an alternative model. Instead of interpreting
another theoretically, what we do (roughly) is to imagine the world from
the other’s point of view, let our mental machinery run as if we were them,
and attribute whatever emerges to them (Gordon 1986; Heal 1986). The
key idea—imagining ourselves in the position of the other (or ‘perspective
taking’ as it came to be called)—evoked the notion of empathy. Although
the view came settled on the name ‘simulation theory’, it was first known
as ‘the empathy view’ (see Davies and Stone 1995, 1; Goldman 2006,
17). The debate between functionalism (‘theory theory’) and simulation
theory became a branch of philosophy in its own right, spawning a num-
ber of collections (in particular, Davies and Stone 1995 and an influential
monograph, Goldman 2006).
Alongside work on the theory of mind, there was increased interest in
the philosophy of the emotions. ‘Empathy’ is absent from a key edited
collection on the emotions that came out in 1980 (Rorty 1980). However,
by 2000, when Peter Goldie wrote his highly regarded book on the emo-
tions, it merited a section to itself (Goldie 2000, 194–204). Philosophers
and psychologists continued to explore the issue of what connections, if
any, there were between empathy and morality (Batson, Klein et al. 1995;
Hoffman 2000). This buzzing confusion of debate took a major step for-
ward when Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie organized a large interdisci-
plinary conference on empathy, Karsten Stueber produced a monograph
on the topic (Stueber 2006), and Coplan and Goldie an edited collection
(Coplan and Goldie 2011), including an introduction that drew on the by
now several disciplines employing the term. Whether the term slipped out
from academia, or had some other source, it also took a grip on the public
mind. The hopes invested in it were immense. In 2006, Barack Obama
famously claimed that ‘the empathy deficit’ was more important than the
federal deficit and in 2014, Roman Krznaric claimed that ‘when a critical
mass of people join together to make the imaginative leap into the lives of
others, empathy has the power to alter the contours of history’ (Krznaric
2014, 2716). It seemed as if the rise of empathy, both within and without
academia, was unstoppable.
However, for any area of discourse, the co-option of a term with no
clear meaning has its disadvantages. The role of empathy in the philoso-
phy of mind was, as we have seen, primarily epistemological; it was not
particularly related to the feelings and emotions. Rather, it concerned com-
ing to know what was in another’s mind more generally—whether those
were beliefs, desires, hopes or fears. The conception of empathy within
moral philosophy did generally have an affective component—although it
covered both an awareness of other’s emotions and replicating another’s
emotions (Hoffman 2011, 230–231). The notion of empathy as it gripped
the public imagination was similar to that within moral philosophy, in
having feelings and emotions at its core although it was not primarily
epistemological. The principal point of empathy, in its folk psychological
 Introduction 5
usage, was to take on the perspective of others so as to ‘feel with them’.
If a fellow human being is distraught one takes on that emotion from a
first-personal point of view as a gesture of solidarity—something Joel
Smith has termed ‘transparent fellow-feeling’ (Smith 2015). Despite these
differences in emphasis, there were certain elements that made up a core
conception: in particular, that for A to empathize with B, A must imagi-
natively take on B’s perspective and, in doing so, more-or-less accurately
replicate B’s mental state.2
Despite the impression of empathy carrying all before it, there has,
since its revival, been an undercurrent of suspicion of the concept. Within
the philosophy of mind, there has been scepticism, particularly from
Goldie, who moved from a guarded enthusiasm through to a reason-
ably unguarded scepticism (Goldie 2011). The Homeric struggle between
‘theory theory’ and ‘simulation theory’ has revealed that they are not strict
alternatives, and it is now usual to opt for some kind of ‘hybrid’ account
(see Goldman 2006 and also Stueber’s paper in this volume). In addition,
alternatives to both views have been proposed which take us away from
the idea of simulation. Philosophers such as Daniel D. Hutto have never
accepted that ‘perspective taking’ is the primary mechanism for under-
standing others, but rather propose a form of sociocultural account which
has at its heart a ‘narrative understanding’ (see Hutto 2008 and also
the paper by Hutto and Jurgens in this volume). Within moral philoso-
phy, Jesse Prinz and others have pointed out the problematic relationship
between empathy and morality—put simply, empathy inclines us to be
partial, while morality pushes us to being impartial (Prinz 2011; see also
Batson 2014).3 This has recently been taken up outside the academy by
Paul Bloom, who counterposes empathy with a case for ‘rational compas-
sion’ (Bloom 2016).
As indicated above, sufficient time has now passed since flourishing of
interest in the topic to make a reassessment timely. This collection is not
so much the ‘case against’ empathy, but attempts to pull together some
of the work that is reassessing the nature and use of the concept. Read-
ers will note that there is still no sign of convergence on a consensus;
however, there are threads common to various of the positions (although
conspicuously absent from some others). Both of the elements of the core
conception—perspective taking and the subsequent replication of the
other’s mental state—have increasingly come under scrutiny. The result
is that theorists feel more able to explore conceptions of ‘fellow feeling’
that do not rely on that core conception.

2. Overview of the Chapters

This volume of essays is organized into three parts. Part I highlights the
methodological function of empathy in opening up the mind to an under-
standing of the past through historical narratives, thereby gesturing at a
6 Derek Matravers and Anik Waldow
richer notion of empathy that encompasses more complex processes of
affective engagement than standard accounts suggest. Part II turns to the
discussion of empathy in ordinary interpersonal engagements, bringing
together essays that broadly accept the centrality of perspective taking in
empathy, while critically evaluating what empathetic processes are and
what kind of understanding they deliver. Part III takes this critical dimen-
sion further by advancing alternative theories that replace imaginative
perspective taking through models of affective cognition based on narra-
tive engagement and competence, forms of interactive attunement and an
associative model of empathy.
Chapter 2 starts with a discussion of empathy as a method in the study
of history. By engaging with Herder’s concept of Einfühlung, Anik Wal-
dow argues that through the experience of affective responses triggered
by the mind’s empathetic engagement with historical narratives, we enter
into what could be termed a pre-Davidsonian form of affect-driven trian-
gulation. This triangulation enables the mind to generate new conceptual
resources that enhance a richer grasp of the reality of human life. More
generally, this discussion shows that empathy has an important epistemic
function, not only in processes that seek to understand other persons’
mental states, but also in world-directed and fact-seeking investigations. A
conception of empathy thus surfaces that requires us to respond affectively
to the language of others and thereby brings into focus the importance
of widening the scope of phenomena representing instances of empathy’s
regular functioning.
Following on from this conception of the epistemic value of empathy,
Chapter 3 discusses the risks and advantages of an emotional engagements
with historical writers. In a case study of three scientific biographers, Nick
Jardine examines the influences of sympathy, antipathy and irony, each
time focusing on the nature of the writer’s emotional involvement and
the manner in which it is communicated to the reader. Jardine claims
that irony is particularly suitable to bring out the conceptual and moral
distance separating us from the past, by offering interpretations that can
successfully deal with the problem that past emotional responses, beliefs
and motives often seem rather alien to us. What can be concluded from
his analysis is that empathy is a useful historiographical tool, however,
only if it ties in with more complex hermeneutical processes that study
the use of genres and styles.
Chapter 4 continues with reflections on the role of meta-affective and
meta-cognitive capacities in processes of empathy. Focusing on empathy
in its function of producing self-knowledge and knowledge of others, Elisa
Galgut proposes to conceive of mentalization as a specific form of empa-
thy that requires the development of higher-order reflective capacities.
Literature, she argues, is particularly useful in cultivating these higher-
order empathetic capacities, as it stimulates the imagination and ability
to adopt a variety of different points of view. In this context too, as much
 Introduction 7
as in the discussions of Chapters 2 and 3, it is the style and language of
the author that is taken to be a crucial factor in producing a certain type
of empathetic understanding.
Offering a critical evaluation of the strong focus on perspective taking
in current debates on empathy, Derek Matravers distances himself from
conceptions that are too demanding and narrow when describing process
responsible for the production of empathy. By directing attention to the
objects of empathetic mental episodes, he argues in Chapter 5, standard
accounts of perspective taking face a dilemma: either they fail to explain
what the object of empathy is, or, if they can do this, they lack a plau-
sible account of the phenomenology of empathetic emotions. In order to
deal with this problem, he claims, the necessary and sufficient conditions
through which empathy arises have to be relaxed. Instead of requiring
the imagination to be a source of empathy, we should acknowledge any
process to perform this role if this process results in an emotion intended
to represent what the other is feeling.
In Chapter 6, rather than focusing on the sources of empathy, Heidi
Maibom offers reflections on the kind of knowledge empathy generates.
Addressing the objection that, in empathy, we project ourselves into oth-
ers to the effect that we fail to have an accurate representation of their
emotions, she argues that accuracy is unsatisfactory as a criterion for
measuring empathy’s epistemic merits. What really matters is that empa-
thy enables us to comprehend the other from a first-personal point of
view and, precisely for this reason, counts as epistemically relevant, since
the type of knowledge empathy creates is not only experiential but also
other-directed in its capacity to capture the specific quality of what the
other person is going through.
The dangers of projection are further explored in Louise Braddock’s
reflections in Chapter 7. Based on Richard Wollheim’s distinction
between simple and complex projection, she conceives of projection
as interacting at multiple levels with sympathy. Yet, according to Brad-
dock’s analysis, empathy is often used to refer to the undistinguished
whole of our affective communications, without identifying projection
as one of its constituent elements. When this happens, empathy pos-
sesses harmful potential for practices of investigation, care and therapy,
so that it becomes necessary to make cognitively accessible where pro-
jection enters the scene, while mitigating its destructive effects. Only
then, Braddock argues, can empathy be a useful tool that enables correct
mental state attributions.
In Chapter 8—the first essay of Part III of this volume—Dan Hutto
and Alan Jurgens provide a fresh defence of narrative theory. Dis-
tinguishing between basic and more sophisticated forms of empathy,
they conceive of our discursive practices as crucial when seeking
an understanding of human reasons for action. This understanding
emerges without the need to simulate the other person’s perspective.
Other documents randomly have
different content
 Computer Science - Solution Manual
Summer 2021 - Research Center

Prepared by: Associate Prof. Garcia

Date: July 28, 2025

Summary 1: Critical analysis and evaluation

Learning Objective 1: Practical applications and examples
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Learning Objective 2: Case studies and real-world applications
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Learning Objective 3: Best practices and recommendations
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Learning Objective 4: Experimental procedures and results
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Learning Objective 5: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Literature review and discussion
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 7: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Note: Ethical considerations and implications
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Study tips and learning strategies
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Ethical considerations and implications
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
References 2: Fundamental concepts and principles
Remember: Case studies and real-world applications
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 12: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Important: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Case studies and real-world applications
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Practical applications and examples
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Research findings and conclusions
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Definition: Best practices and recommendations
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 17: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 18: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Case studies and real-world applications
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 19: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Research findings and conclusions
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Quiz 3: Case studies and real-world applications
Definition: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Key terms and definitions
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Ethical considerations and implications
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 23: Research findings and conclusions
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Remember: Case studies and real-world applications
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 25: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Note: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 26: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Best practices and recommendations
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Key terms and definitions
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
References 4: Learning outcomes and objectives
Key Concept: Study tips and learning strategies
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 31: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 32: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Research findings and conclusions
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 33: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 33: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 35: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 35: Key terms and definitions
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Best practices and recommendations
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 39: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 39: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Exercise 5: Historical development and evolution
Remember: Current trends and future directions
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 42: Key terms and definitions
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Definition: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 45: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Historical development and evolution
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 49: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 49: Key terms and definitions
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 50: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Summary 6: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
Example 50: Historical development and evolution
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 51: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 51: Current trends and future directions
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 53: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Note: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 54: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 54: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Case studies and real-world applications
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 57: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Ethical considerations and implications
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and

personal growth!

ebookfinal.com