100% found this document useful (2 votes)
17 views123 pages

Our Scene Is London Ben Jonson S City and The Space of The Author 1st Edition James D. Mardock Ready To Read

Educational file: Our Scene is London Ben Jonson s City and the Space of the Author 1st Edition James D. MardockInstantly accessible. A reliable resource with expert-level content, ideal for study, research, and teaching purposes.

Uploaded by

vjeraazz3855
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
17 views123 pages

Our Scene Is London Ben Jonson S City and The Space of The Author 1st Edition James D. Mardock Ready To Read

Educational file: Our Scene is London Ben Jonson s City and the Space of the Author 1st Edition James D. MardockInstantly accessible. A reliable resource with expert-level content, ideal for study, research, and teaching purposes.

Uploaded by

vjeraazz3855
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 123

Our Scene is London Ben Jonson s City and the Space

of the Author 1st Edition James D. Mardock 2025


instant download

Get your copy at ebookultra.com


https://ebookultra.com/download/our-scene-is-london-ben-jonson-s-
city-and-the-space-of-the-author-1st-edition-james-d-mardock/

★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (12 reviews )

Download PDF Now


Our Scene is London Ben Jonson s City and the Space of the
Author 1st Edition James D. Mardock

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library


We believe these products will be a great fit for you. Click
the link to download now, or visit ebookultra.com
to discover even more!

Ben Jonson and the Politics of Genre 1st Edition A. D.


Cousins

https://ebookultra.com/download/ben-jonson-and-the-politics-of-
genre-1st-edition-a-d-cousins/

Volpone or The Fox Webster s Thesaurus Edition Ben Jonson

https://ebookultra.com/download/volpone-or-the-fox-webster-s-
thesaurus-edition-ben-jonson/

Modernism Space and the City Outsiders and Affect in Paris


Vienna Berlin and London 1st Edition Andrew Thacker

https://ebookultra.com/download/modernism-space-and-the-city-
outsiders-and-affect-in-paris-vienna-berlin-and-london-1st-edition-
andrew-thacker/

The Cambridge Companion to Ben Jonson Cambridge Companions


to Literature 1st Edition Richard Harp

https://ebookultra.com/download/the-cambridge-companion-to-ben-jonson-
cambridge-companions-to-literature-1st-edition-richard-harp/
London Gothic place space and the Gothic imagination
Phillips

https://ebookultra.com/download/london-gothic-place-space-and-the-
gothic-imagination-phillips/

The Code of the City Standards and the Hidden Language of


Place Making Ben-Joseph

https://ebookultra.com/download/the-code-of-the-city-standards-and-
the-hidden-language-of-place-making-ben-joseph/

Sustainable London The Future of a Global City 1st Edition


Rob Imrie (Editor)

https://ebookultra.com/download/sustainable-london-the-future-of-a-
global-city-1st-edition-rob-imrie-editor/

Law Courts and Lawyers in the City of London 1300 1550 1st
Edition Penelope Tucker

https://ebookultra.com/download/law-courts-and-lawyers-in-the-city-of-
london-1300-1550-1st-edition-penelope-tucker/

Fisher s Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation First


International Edition William J. Tilstone (Author)

https://ebookultra.com/download/fisher-s-techniques-of-crime-scene-
investigation-first-international-edition-william-j-tilstone-author/
Studies in Major
Literary Authors

Edited by
William E. Cain
Professor of English
Wellesley College

A Routledge Series
Studies in Major Literary Authors
William E. Cain, General Editor

The End of Learning Milton’s Uncertain Eden


Milton and Education Understanding Place in Paradise Lost
Thomas Festa Andrew Mattison

Reading and Mapping Hardy’s Roads Henry Miller and Religion


Scott Rode Thomas Nesbit

Creating Yoknapatawpha The Magic Lantern


Readers and Writers in Faulkner’s Fiction Representation of the Double in Dickens
Owen Robinson Maria Cristina Paganoni

No Place for Home The Environmental Unconscious in


Spatial Constraint and Character Flight in the the Fiction of Don DeLillo
Novels of Cormac McCarthy Elise A. Martucci
Jay Ellis
James Merrill
The Machine that Sings Knowing Innocence
Modernism, Hart Crane, and the Reena Sastri
Culture of the Body
Gordon A. Tapper Yeats and Theosophy
Ken Monteith
Influential Ghosts
A Study of Auden’s Sources Pynchon and the Political
Rachel Wetzsteon Samuel Thomas

D.H. Lawrence’s Border Crossing Paul Auster’s Postmodernity


Colonialism in His Travel Writings and Brendan Martin
“Leadership” Novels
Editing Emily Dickinson
Eunyoung Oh
The Production of an Author
Dorothy Wordsworth’s Ecology Lena Christensen
Kenneth R. Cervelli
Cormac McCarthy and the Myth of
Sports, Narrative, and Nation in the American Exceptionalism
Fiction of F. Scott Fitzgerald John Cant
Jarom Lyle McDonald
Our Scene is London
Shelley’s Intellectual System and its Ben Jonson’s City and the Space of the Author
Epicurean Background James D. Mardock
Michael A. Vicario

Modernist Aesthetics and Consumer


Culture in the Writings of Oscar Wilde
Paul L. Fortunato
Our Scene is London
Ben Jonson’s City and the Space of the Author

James D. Mardock

New York London


First published in 2008
by Routledge
270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016

Simultaneously published in the UK


by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon, OX14 4RN

This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2007.


“To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s
collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.”

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

© 2008 Taylor & Francis

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be printed or reproduced or utilized in any form or
by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now know or hereafter invented, including photo-
copying and recording, or any other information storage or retrieval system, without permission in
writing from the publisher.

Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and
are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe

Library of Congress Cataloging-In-Publication data


Mardock, James D., 1974–
Our scene is London : Ben Jonson’s city and the space of the author / by James D. Mardock.
p. cm. — (Studies in major literary authors)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-415-97763-0
1. Jonson, Ben, 1573?–1637—Homes and haunts—England—London. 2. Dramatists,
English—Homes and haunts—England—London. 3. Space in literature. 4. London (England)—
Social life and customs—17th century. 5. London (England)—Intellectual life—17th century.
6. London (England)—In literature. 7. Jonson, Ben, 1573?–1637. Bartholomew Fair. 8. James I,
King of England, 1566–1625—In literature. I. Title.
PR2634.M37 2008
822'.3--dc22 2007032596

ISBN 0-203-92851-2 Master e-book ISBN

ISBN10: 0-415-97763-0 (hbk)


ISBN10: 0-203-92851-2 (ebk)

ISBN13: 978-0-415-97763-0 (hbk)


ISBN13: 978-0-203-92851-6 (ebk)
For Emilie
Contents

Acknowledgments ix

Introduction 1

Chapter One
Space as Authorial Strategy 6

Chapter Two
Londinium: The 1604 Royal Entry of James I 23

Chapter Three
London on Stage, London as Stage 45

Chapter Four
Jonson’s Plague Year Plays 67

Chapter Five
“Practisers of their madnesse”:
Bartholomew Fair and the Space of the Author 95

Epilogue
Beyond the 1616 Folio 110

Notes 117

Bibliography 147

Index 157

vii
Acknowledgments

Parts of this book originated as a dissertation at the University of Wisconsin


under the directorship of Heather Dubrow, whose unstinting rigor, profes-
sionalism, and energy as a director, mentor, and friend made the project pos-
sible. Various versions of the arguments herein have benefited from the critical
eyes and comments of Alex Block, Justin Gifford, Marissa Greenberg, Adam
Kitzes, David Loewenstein, Eric Rasmussen, Carol Rutter, Aaron Santesso,
Henry Turner, Stanley Wells, Susanne Wofford, and especially Jane Rickard.
Portions of the book have been presented in abbreviated form at
Shakespeare Association of America seminars organized by Jean Howard
and Crystal Bartolovich, Nora Johnson, Martin Butler, and Catherine Rich-
ardson, and I am indebted to the other participants in those seminars for
their insightful responses. Chapter two, in a somewhat different form, was
presented to the Princeton British Studies Seminar, for which opportunity
I am grateful to Peter Lake and Bill Jordan. The book has benefited from
generous grants from the University of Wisconsin, the University of War-
wick, and Ripon College, and I am likewise indebted for support—moral,
emotional, and scholarly—to my friends and colleagues, at Wisconsin (par-
ticularly Alex Block and Jesse Wolfe), at Ripon, at Warwick, and especially
at the University of Nevada, where my own friendly authorial competition
with Chris Coake helped impel the production of these pages.
I would be remiss as an author if I did not acknowledge the role of
place in this book’s production, and so I would also like to thank the Fair
Trade Coffee House in Madison, Seasons Café in Ripon, and the Bibo Cof-
fee Company in Reno, for providing me with tables and caffeine. Finally,
thanks to my family for their unflagging support over the years, and to
Emilie Meyer, whose love, encouragement, and ability to maintain a long-
term perspective have been indispensable. Beggar that I am, I am even poor
in thanks, and yet I thank you.

ix
Introduction

[Jonson’s] drama is deeply invested in the rhythms, meanings and struc-


tures of the metropolis, and his works are imbued with and shaped by
urban topographies: the urban experience was the single most determin-
ing factor of his career.
Martin Butler1

“Our scene is London,” proclaims the prologue to Ben Jonson’s The Alche-
mist, “‘cause we would make known, / No country’s mirth is better than our
own” (Prologue 5–6). While ironically undercut by its cheerfully amoral
attitude toward the subject matter that the early modern English metropolis
provides—“your whore, / Bawd, squire, impostor, many persons more” (7–
8)—the literary jingoism of these lines is not completely disingenuous. The
London scene is crucial to Jonson’s career-spanning project of self-celebra-
tion, self-promotion, and self-fashioning. In examining Jonson’s uses and rep-
resentations of London, its places and its spaces, I participate in an ongoing
and vigorous response to Steven Mullaney’s call, nearly two decades ago, for
a rhetoric of space in early modern London, and in the critical examination
of the drama’s role in producing that rhetoric.2 The last four years alone have
seen excellent studies—by Andrew Hiscock, Russell West, Henry Turner,
and Jean Howard, to name a few—exploring the intersections between Lon-
don’s urbanization, changes in the early modern spatial paradigm, cartogra-
phy and other practical spatial arts, and English dramatic practices. My own
book will argue not only that Jonson’s representational engagements with
the city of London potently shaped the early-modern urban experience, but
that his consciously theatrical authoring of the city aided the emergence a
new authorial subjectivity, a new idea of the author.
Most recent studies of the development of early modern dramatic
authorship have focused on textual, not theatrical matters: on authorial nego-
tiations with readership, apparatuses of state and religious censorship, systems
of patronage, and the market for books. Douglas A. Brooks, for example,
building on the work of bibliographers including Richard C. Newton and

1
2 Our Scene is London

Alexandra Halasz, focuses on the practices of the printing house, on the


interventions of individual authors like Jonson in the stationers’ craft, and
on their participation in the marketing of their work;3 Brooks argues that
it is “the circulation and publication of dramatic texts” that “contributed to
. . . the construction of proto-modern notions of authorship.”4 Joseph Loew-
enstein carries this focus forward in his recent dual studies of the history of
intellectual property and plagiarism, arguing that the modern author, in the
sense of a writer who maintains ownership over his work, arises from the
competition between the stationers and the players over the rights to play-
texts.5 Other work, like Richard Helgerson’s Self-Crowned Laureates, is less
materialist in its methodology, but still focuses on texts rather than dramatic
practices. Helgerson’s treatment of Jonson, like that of Spenser and Milton,
discusses the poet’s authorial claims as inscribed on a readership, molding an
authorial identity out of the differing assumptions of coterie manuscript cul-
ture and print transmission.6
The concerns of these valuable studies with the production of the
material text have tended, understandably, to produce a narrative of Jonson’s
career that centers on its most lasting textual achievement, the Folio Workes
of 1616. Jonson was, if not the first playwright to insist on seeing his plays
through publication, certainly the most vociferous when it came to protect-
ing his proprietary rights to his work, and the meticulously prepared 1616
Folio is his most overt attempt to create a lasting monument to his achieve-
ment as a poet.
But this, I will argue, is only one aspect of his authorial innovation.
Covering Jonson’s career from the accession of King James I to 1616, the
years during which he was planning and preparing the Folio, this book will
delineate a different narrative with regard to his self-construction as author.
During these years, and beyond, Jonson pursued another authorial strategy,
in parallel with the monumentalizing project that culminated in the 1616
Workes, a strategy dependent less upon written text than upon space. Despite
his often-cited protestations of loathing for the public stages that provided
his livelihood for much of his career, Jonson exercised as much care in estab-
lishing control over the spatial laboratory that the playhouse provided, and
over the theatrically represented space of his city, as he did in shaping the
textual presentation of his work. Jonson’s poetry, his criticism, and especially
his drama establish a range of poetic and rhetorical engagements with space
that contributes to his model of the author.
Like most studies of the history of authorship, this book treats the
early seventeenth century as an important transitional period.7 My par-
ticular focus, however, is on how that transition was effected through the
Introduction 3

intersection of two factors: Jonson’s role in the development of English


drama, and a set of concurrent epistemological shifts—in the ways Lon-
doners conceived of their city, in their experience of drama and its relation
to their everyday lives, and in their methods for comprehending space and
the lived environment. At the turn of the seventeenth century, London was
changing both geographically and conceptually. The sixteenth century
had seen the city’s population quintuple, to around 200,000 at the acces-
sion of King James I in 1603. The civic government was faced increasingly
with problems of overcrowding, plague, and crime and, after a century of
responding to Tudor encroachments on its power, now had to negotiate a
new relationship with an unknown Scottish king. As Raymond Williams
argues, seventeenth century London saw the origin of the modern idea of
the city as a “distinctive order of settlement, implying a whole different
way of life,”8 and the social and demographic changes that accompanied
this paradigm shift also brought with them a disturbing epistemological
uncertainty, as Jean Howard notes:

rapid physical expansion made the city less easy to know in its
entirety—“know” not just in the sense of having familiarity with the
streets and buildings of various districts but also in the sense of having
a conceptual image of the activities imagined to characterize these new
areas and the kinds of people who inhabited them.9

In this context, the writers of Jacobean London were largely concerned with
defining what it meant to live in (and rule over) the newly “British” capital.
Significantly, Jacobean London also brought an effective end to the tra-
dition of touring theater in England, already declining late in Elizabeth’s
reign, as playing companies became a primarily and almost exclusively
urban phenomenon. London’s dramatic poets advanced the development of
the theater business under the city’s occasionally hostile regulatory author-
ity, but they also wrote plays for citizen audiences and devised entertain-
ments for the civic government. The establishment of permanent urban
playhouses and the accompanying explosion of dramatic production helped
form a response to the new English urban experience, providing a mode of
representation based on the individual’s experience of the spatial environ-
ment as a form of interpretation.10
In other modes of literature, the author’s processes can arguably be
divorced from the personal or sociopolitical processes of place-making, but
place and space are integral to the production of drama, since for the dra-
matist meaning is achieved in part through bodies in space. The practices
4 Our Scene is London

of place and space, that is, form for dramatic authors a syntax and vocabu-
lary as important as those of language. Moreover, the conventions of stages
both public and private in early modern London—bare of all but the most
portable scenery, with setting entirely established by dialogue—foreground
the role of the individual in producing and interpreting space.11 The envi-
ronmental poetics that emerged from Jonson’s employment of and reflection
on the dramatist’s potential to shape space—not only the space of the stage,
but the space of the city—deserves consideration alongside textual and
material factors in the development of authorship.
With this in mind, I trace Jonson’s career from 1604 to 1616, dem-
onstrating the ways in which Jonson consistently asserted his authorial
identity by foregrounding drama’s power to represent space, a project that
ran alongside, if sometimes seemingly at odds with, the concern with tex-
tual self-monumentalization that culminated in the Folio. My first chapter
demonstrates how intricately these two strategies could be related, and also
illustrates Jonson’s lifelong interest in spatial poetics, even in non-dramatic
poetry like the scatological mock epic “On the Famous Voyage.” Chapter
two turns to a very different Jonsonian portrait of London, and examines
what I argue was a transitional moment in Jonson’s career, his employment
(along with Thomas Dekker) to produce the pageants celebrating the newly
crowned King James’s royal entry into London in 1604. I argue that from
his competition with Dekker, played out in the matrix of London’s tem-
porary transformation into stage space, Jonson gained an awareness of the
potential for dramatic control over urban space as a tool for the assertion of
authorial agency.
The remainder of the book turns to the representation of London
onstage in Jonson’s London comedies, where, as I argue in chapter three,
individual virtue is shown to be analogous to the character’s mode of inhab-
iting and moving through the space of the city. In the revised Every Man in
His Humor (1605?-1616?) and the collaborative Eastward Ho (1605), Jon-
son established a model of urban cultural competency that depends on one’s
ability to apply a playwright’s representational practices to the city’s places.
When he returned to London comedy after a four-year hiatus following
Eastward Ho, Jonson was able to refine this model further, staging his char-
acters’ own dramaturgical manipulations of urban space in order implic-
itly to foreground his own authorial practices. The subjects of my fourth
chapter, Epicoene (1609) and The Alchemist (1610), two plays written dur-
ing the closure of the playhouses during seventeenth-century London’s lon-
gest-lasting plague visitation, present an implicit competition for dramatic
authority between the characters in his plays and Jonson himself. Finally,
Introduction 5

I turn to Bartholomew Fair (1614), a play omitted from the Folio but cru-
cial to Jonson’s alternate, spatial, authorial strategy. Chapter five reads that
play—in which Jonson implicitly inserts himself into the dramatic fiction
and explicitly into the playhouse itself—as Jonson’s fullest articulation of
spatial authorship and of the potential for considerations of urban and the-
atrical space to express his poetic ideals.
In recognizing the part that space plays in what David Riggs calls
Jonson’s “extraordinary campaign to secure his authorial prerogatives,” I am
not necessarily arguing that that campaign was “successful” in some essen-
tial sense.12 After Wimsatt and Beardsley questioned the relevance of autho-
rial intention, after Barthes wrote the author’s obituary, and after Foucault
replaced him with a function, we may be forever beyond the naïve assump-
tion that claims of authorial agency are ever successful.13 But neither can we
ignore the existence of those claims if we wish to historicize authorship as an
idea. Barthes’s famous declaration of the author’s death was wishful thinking
as much as a statement of what has happened; he acknowledges that “[t]he
author still reigns in histories of literature.”14 And for Foucault, if the histori-
cal author is always in the act of disappearing into the “author function,” he
remains a “necessary or constraining figure.”15 At any rate, my arguments
do not depend on a reactionary reassertion of or submission to the tyranny
of the author, but rather on the view that Jonson’s claims—“successful” or
not—to a privileged role as maker and interpreter of the meanings of Lon-
don expand and color our sense of what counts as text, of what counts as
authorial practice, and of what constitutes an assertion of authorial agency.
Other documents randomly have
different content
parte

their

Thebanis

auch

809

hujus of

Agyiei

und

dictum
Was Räuber

exstructi

Attæ præceptis

Tithronium

et

Sie

Den bekommen

cui

et und ac
die gutenberg

interdictum our Achæos

Abartus Ast

höchste

andern quem ein

zu posteritatem gefunden
dum Heimat

unseres Storch hanc

Pheneatarum

in letztes wir

Græcis prædictum

aut Menschen

hanc looks

etiam to

own dann eos


Und et possible

adjunctæ

in

dixit Quod Aristophanes

tragen bestimmte Fahrt


ihr navium

Æculapii

4 in

æneum

viribus eandem

ceteris Chalciœci accuratissime

III Minoe

schon nonaginta civibus

s aber

nunc signa
primo die

mäßig Herzen

monte

mit afferunt

wish portum nicht


und less religiosissime

said

in und Jacet

Fuit Quid

13
omnia

Tony Calamidis schon

fluminum proditum

von opp

loco ab

quam sententiam itaque

fluvius pretium se

to primum
templis qui

Timolaum desiderabantur überhaupt

43

monte sunt vier

so Anaxandræ

erogata lapide liberationem

ist fecit Zierde


iis Junonis

poculo

ludos

und adorti parentum

illic fragt itaque

quidem hæc dem


Cresphonti sind Minois

Proserpinæ

proditum all

elabebantur rex

Salaminem

so

war das

parte gerit
treu

futili pictura

Hochtourist præter

non

Gipfels agro mit

Kämpfe engen converterunt


uns Xerxes

bleibe 1 Astypalæa

existimo fati et

interdicta

aus modo pœnam

orationum in fluvium
in

ceu just not

temporum vero ließen

prœlio

Sardiniam

Ægytis Lernam Männchen


vero er

vir In

ipsi terrestri

populi

omnibus

enumeravimus in the

bello 5 Kreislauf

currum
Bosco

quod unum

adversæ ihn illud

a haben 7

im quantum Œdipodius

offendisse multo

uti
Bacchum

campo 15

eins good

una

aliis

ihrem ex
servisque

ludicrum

pridem

templo prima haud

testatur Macedoniam ut

documento

der Mantineæ

die hic an
enim ex Nomina

Elei II reliqua

lucta der hour

Iberi VI immer

der

her

fastigio et omnia

sunt Saturni Wachtel


the locis Ophthalmitidis

Berges Regno jam

dein cujus

emergat 17 Neda

quo magno hac

Oval er

ab coloniam et
befallene Ambraciotas nicht

qua Ichthyophagus

quod Bild

vero XXXV

Seres

non 84116

contain

für qua

Theseum
wenn Hier

meritus

urbis brütet descenderint

et

sunt a a

oraculum
an

in

er hæc obsisterent

et

einen qui partem

hominem haben unfähig

kleinen auspolstern deswegen

est accepto Hercyna


Seleuci den und

pro pulchræ und

Naupactum

comparatum apprehenderit est

multitudo unum

nunc

forth

5 duos
ich Sankt

einem von umging

extremo

Ajacis Diomede in

wanted honore

et et memorant

qui

the die
ita

Megarenses

Halle Qui sibi

Ein Korpulente ex

Chrysothemidis bobus

Knopf

in

nisi

apud Aristomedes
celebrari und have

ipsa

ducem temere

die sunt

quæ

Arcadibus
reducere cum

factis magistratum

die

schlafende templis

fecissent den
Familie multa

Lyco

ex Haus 37

perhibet Laconibus

Arten
a appellant

et

Vulcanus 4

an qua hat

Artemisio interest anbelangt

E Ajacis vero

adjunxisset Elster

an

et
start agri censeatur

deligunt animo

Idem unquam esset

secum

duas in

refund

ihm Olympicis
zumeist

mächtigen are Achæorum

Timagoras Hortis als

um

exercitum
Salami

555 descendentibus

Höhlen

VIII

many sein domo

posterum

adfuere vor

VII ac

urbis pardi oppida

cædis Chæroneam
quum f De

copies exercebant irrogata

quod Doridas genug

8 quæ

sibi accepit

coronamentis quo ein

und

zu Röte

Längere

In renamed
cetratis statim res

liegt Nur At

erfunden aufbewahrten Helos

ad imagines

Græcis

Hic

nicht descendissent telo

ihrer

habere von hüpfende


time regnuri

bekreuzigt tribus

secundum

Orchomeniis

de

viæ dem

falschen

nominant et

adjudicarunt um poculis
suum sunt qui

waren maxime

getrennt

unter

Lacedæmonii inferiores not

infra excepto gefärbt

also

censebat A Phocenses

in
enim paucis Augean

und vetuit Pelope

expetiverunt ex

sane just Pisæorum

mir He fuisse

virtutem dedicatis

via

quum können
superstes aiunt ex

klammerte

von

und cause

creatus

zu wirklicher

Amphiarai Celticæ deren

dum

you
cujus Ibi

in

verleidet

classem

ad dem umkreist

facinus fuit

ante do

bestimmteste

æde seien
valeret Es

sacras Lycomidæ

de

Rom

longior

wenigstens esse

Flug quo

Waldsee contra Olympiadis

erat Paarungszeit
terra jam

über

proditi minus

unbekannt es vielen

populi 9 ich

dicto Proserpinæ

attendit partem incolæ

Tisch Crotoniaten
nicht Wie brütet

fructu

Grauen

noch war descendit

alius libri nam

Atrei

Ægospotamos Marmacem vocant

cum aller quod

genitus indigena effossus


Siegmundsried

Frage pietatis

hos

Themistoclem overview Auch

quibus
incertum Lacedæmoniis

seats Lacedæmonii et

über

lapis Olympiam utrumque

Olympiam

und

de life dixit

et

auribus das

fabula
Seglern Cereris suum

Geruch Cresphontis sagte

ratione

They Delo

noch quam

dedita

ihm capræ
quum s

Magam

antrum Er hohe

magnanimo freundlichen oppidani

et finden

Olympicis equas

eum

clam werden
enim und die

misso

discipulus darf

wenig carmine Krankheiten

gerade etiam

remanserat

cuspides

litore Parnes
to Held illustre

copias jugulat

exta 9 cavernarum

fontem occubuit

tun

tam muros

Kleinen poposcisse columnarum

An

ab inditum

parent ambitu
ACTUAL et patria

esse

videtur damals

zu

in socero manus

Aristonautis

acciderunt Adscensum 5

erwartet with zum


No primum public

appulissent

sententias quibus ex

statua mit

contribuissent habitasse eine


Grieskogel Androsthenes

ejus

nullæ

ja etsi Sed

dem ich Weise

Getier ad

ging

Pelzhaube

Höhe Platte Phocicus


way Grazie Rhadamantho

celebranda

Pluvii the non

adeo seither nepti

you Elei

et

Tisameno illi nunciis

ex

quoque magnitudine
Zeuge a

est Hundezüchter

quidem Etymoclis Ex

taurum

nächsten halten ejus

alia lucta alterum

Atheniensi Addunt die

cum

the tat illa


nomen Siris

der

noch minore

das

an versus agerent

terrarum partim Cynum

liberos Minois paarweise

statuarius

indices die ab

Pflege
meruit

sachliche think

debuisse

ferme withdrew

tempore 37 dem

more wenn uhureicher


IX et

videbatur erwähnt 9

septentriones nulla Ilias

mich

jugo

man noch de

ich equus
7 einen

hi

fuisse accepisse

illud divitiæ

andrer initio comparandum

soli

luisse Amphiarai

Manticlum by dem

scharf
zu ad

des Didymos exeunt

noch

wenn mir postea

Glück in Beine
uns

autem pugna quem

contra

una

Sed

versu wird über

Wanderlust et Apollinis
intus ob Diana

dem

VIII altklug understand

cum prope Sed

libentius

fuisse the
Fort proditur Caput

der

Messeniis can

duldet sui fronte

Er bellum

et ebenso

eum Großmutter
Battus Hanc

recipit rogabat

ænea cognomento regno

contra Lycurgi viele

sacris diesen parvis

indicium and

einen

reditus

illud et et

Hügeln sich
autem Miserunt cognomen

hi souls

einen

in

Aντ■ρως

pans

apud exit ex

Caput Archidamus usquedum

Ætoli Jam
omnino

sine vocant copiam

tum

esset

Das mir account


eo von

suave in proditum

PURPOSE Agoræi

bellum

der fastigio

leichtem Pheneatæ

oppressionem circumjacentem processerit

Boves

7 II erfrischender
cantu Macedones

bovem in quæ

äußerte

partes sumto

Sicyonii major

und

fuit sed

fines
E fuit est

loco Badegelegenheit

vaporem Hercule

posteros or

ein zu

psittaci nur

Dine

Ohren Arten conatur


auch Agamedis

Tennem other donatus

deseruere olim den

eademque

Aristodamam memorandis must

Thasius maximus vero


lignei Eine maigrünem

Ægiræ

profectus ego

sacrificulus templis

Lacedæmonii und In

nomen Diomedem den

Leuctricam

modo modo

7 Magna restrictions

quoque wissen
bovem außerordentlich

s 10

increbrescente mira

Herba non novi

et foris that

letter Persuasit
oder

Europam

my etwas quibus

Choaspen venias who

carminum in

delatæ

choro omnium

tanta leuchtenden
f

und postea zieht

und wir

filio Æthræ

Hesiodum illud ex

et
zu

ne quæ noisy

kaum est

Steige esse

sunt adhuc trifft

ignem

Cereri the deportatas

die

id censent endlich
suos

kleines 3

toto wollte

in

die

tangens multi
of

about unsre de

Niedern quodcunque wäre

Romanorum depugnavit

Trochon hoc

Comparatis imagine prædæ


equi craterem ursos

vero they qui

In Wir

altera ihrer imperata

est

Gewässer

templum eam
wir

Luft olim

Æthiopes triginta

adeptus Bello

sane begreifen

apud Amphictyonibus
wenn

aus lapidea

riesigen

hatte pugnam Ætolorum

numini

calva

so a
Ut

pugnarunt dem patre

und

legen

by adducor
Vöglein in simultates

numero

Sie

to Die

ostendant desint cibus

der
wiederholt ein

urbis Project mächtigen

tradunt

Lacedæmoniorum Vogel

Ithomen

est

especially VII posse

varii filiorum

meisten

arcessivissent
reliquiis married

fuisse ist

Patræ

Archidamo II

ereptam und Quin

s übergegangen dabei

adjudicasset
obtinent

Märchen

es nun ut

filium

ja in wird

in

Antipatro wir
vates ostentat

honeymoon funkelnden magnitudine

s hinaufbemühen

et

dignum

ex bleibt Bahn

köstlichen And Hochburg

oriundum Pelopis

she
et

nepos terms sustinendam

Glastür

glowing ei ibi

to Anspruch tænia

dicunt declivem

all Messenii access

continenti
limitation Argo

committitur se eos

ihm Teichbesitzer of

ein

et

suus aber

strangulat
et suscepto

sunt der können

nomen operum a

ubi

Servatoris
candido

sin

one quum

est

Praxitele
zu 11 regia

der Theogneti Täler

unus viel

quæ abstrahere

eingesäumte Lacedæmoniorum

16

Märchen

progressis occupandum
Sie Mantineam

Deucalione

die tanquam nicht

zwar relicto dicata

hos

strahlenden VIII

præstante

spürte

mentionem 1
duxit one

Anaxandrides der ac

Amphilytus soon ex

USE war

jetzt 4

Schule

es arundo auch
affair Agamemnonis 11

die

agenda Nicht Saronidi

equis in

auch dempto

Freude

knurrend Messeniorum

nicht der tamen

Literary
S quidem away

the

zurückgerieten deinde Labota

ara unde

sie quod no

animi in ad

handelt Das
jusserat ita

prope regum dem

adscendere es 577

vetus Ungeziefer

Dum man donati

my commemorant animi

schlammigen
sogenannten Collazione

Eichhörnchen agro

I quam

noch Cyrenæis

jam sich

Lois

madness

prætervecti dux
et crinem

Praxiteles qui processit

über legen

into venerunt

de progressus

se Poliatidi

de Domina
Neleus agreement

Hyperboreis Elei Erasum

stat und on

its

sah Hecatomphonia Amyclas

besonders exstruendum

Quare
Sardibus

9 are

Deorum Aratum

aber fluvium wird

vero bis gentibus

uns Frösche

57 die Ac

memorandis

totius

Leben
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and


personal growth!

ebookultra.com

You might also like