Powell Sept 23 2025 Speech
Powell Sept 23 2025 Speech
Economic Outlook
Remarks by
Jerome H. Powell
Chair
at the
the opportunity to speak to the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce was in the fall
of 2019. I noted then that, “if the outlook changes materially, policy will change as
well.” 1
Little did any of us know! Just a couple of months later, the COVID-19 pandemic
arrived. Both the economy and our policy evolved dramatically in ways no one could
have predicted. Along with actions by Congress, the Administration, and the private
sector, the Fed’s aggressive response helped stave off historically severe downside risks
to the economy.
The COVID pandemic came on the heels of the painfully slow decade-long
recovery from the Global Financial Crisis. These two back-to-back world historical
crises have left behind scars that will be with us for a long time. In democracies around
the world, public trust in economic and political institutions has been challenged. Those
of us who are in public service at this time need to focus tightly on carrying out our
critical missions to the best of our ability in the midst of stormy seas and powerful
crosswinds.
Throughout this turbulent period, central banks like the Fed have had to develop
innovative new policies that were designed to deliver on our statutory goals during times
of crisis, rather than for everyday use. Despite these two unique, extremely large shocks,
the U.S. economy has performed as well or better than other large, advanced economies
around the world. As always, it is essential that we continue to look back and learn the
1
See Jerome H. Powell (2019), “Building on the Gains from the Long Expansion,” speech delivered at the
Annual Meeting of the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce, Providence, Rhode Island,
November 25, paragraph 21, https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/powell20191125a.htm.
-2-
right lessons from these difficult years, and that process has been ongoing for more than a
decade.
Turning to the present day, the U.S. economy is showing resilience in the midst of
substantial changes in trade and immigration policies, as well as in fiscal, regulatory and
geopolitical arenas. These policies are still emerging, and their longer-term implications
Economic Outlook
Recent data show that the pace of economic growth has moderated. The
unemployment rate is low but has edged up. Job gains have slowed, and the downside
risks to employment have risen. At the same time, inflation has risen recently and
remains somewhat elevated. In recent months, it has become clear that the balance of
risks has shifted, prompting us to move our policy stance closer to neutral at our meeting
last week.
GDP rose at a pace of around one and a half percent in the first half of the year,
down from 2.5 percent growth last year. The moderation in growth largely reflects a
slowdown in consumer spending. Activity in the housing sector remains weak, but
business investment in equipment and intangibles has picked up from last year’s pace.
As noted in the September Beige Book, a report that gathers qualitative information from
across the Fed System, businesses continue to say that uncertainty is weighing on their
outlook. Measures of consumer and business sentiment declined sharply in the spring;
they have since moved up but remain low relative to the start of the year.
In the labor market, there has been a marked slowing in both the supply of and
demand for workers—an unusual and challenging development. In this less dynamic and
-3-
somewhat softer labor market, the downside risks to employment have risen. The
unemployment rate edged up to 4.3 percent in August but has remained relatively stable
at a low level over the past year. Payroll job gains slowed sharply over the summer
months, as employers added an average of just 29,000 per month over the past three
months. The recent pace of job creation appears to be running below the “breakeven”
rate needed to hold the unemployment rate constant. But a number of other labor market
indicators remain broadly stable. For example, the ratio of job openings to
unemployment remains near 1. And multiple measures of job openings have been
Inflation has eased significantly from its highs of 2022 but remains somewhat
elevated relative to our 2 percent longer-run goal. The latest available data indicate that
total PCE prices rose 2.7 percent over the 12 months ending in August, up from 2.3
percent in August 2024. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE
prices rose 2.9 percent last month, also higher than the year-ago level. Goods prices,
after falling last year, are driving the pickup in inflation. Incoming data and surveys
suggest that those price increases largely reflect higher tariffs rather than broader price
measures of inflation expectations have moved up, on balance, over the course of this
year on news about tariffs. Beyond the next year or so, however, most measures of
fiscal and regulatory policy remain to be seen. A reasonable base case is that the tariff-
related effects on inflation will be relatively short lived—a one-time shift in the price
-4-
level. A “one-time” increase does not mean “all at once.” Tariff increases will likely
take some time to work their way through supply chains. As a result, this one-time
increase in the price level will likely be spread over several quarters and show up as
But uncertainty around the path of inflation remains high. We will carefully
assess and manage the risk of higher and more persistent inflation. We will make sure
that this one-time increase in prices does not become an ongoing inflation problem.
Monetary Policy
Near-term risks to inflation are tilted to the upside and risks to employment to the
downside—a challenging situation. Two-sided risks mean that there is no risk-free path.
If we ease too aggressively, we could leave the inflation job unfinished and need to
reverse course later to fully restore 2 percent inflation. If we maintain restrictive policy
too long, the labor market could soften unnecessarily. When our goals are in tension like
this, our framework calls for us to balance both sides of our dual mandate.
The increased downside risks to employment have shifted the balance of risks to
achieving our goals. We therefore judged it appropriate at our last meeting to take
another step toward a more neutral policy stance, lowering the target range for the federal
funds rate by 25 basis points to 4 to 4¼ percent. This policy stance, which I see as still
developments.
appropriate stance based on the incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of
sustainably to our 2 percent goal. Our success in delivering on these goals matters to all
Americans. We understand that our actions affect communities, families, and businesses
Thank you again for having me here. I look forward to our discussion.