100% found this document useful (5 votes)
20 views139 pages

(Ebook) Hong Kong's War Crimes Trials by Linton, Suzannah ISBN 9780191749070, 9780199643288, 0191749079, 0199643288 Digital Download

Scholarly document: (Ebook) Hong Kong's war crimes trials by Linton, Suzannah ISBN 9780191749070, 9780199643288, 0191749079, 0199643288 Instant availability. Combines theoretical knowledge and applied understanding in a well-organized educational format.

Uploaded by

manolita6699
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (5 votes)
20 views139 pages

(Ebook) Hong Kong's War Crimes Trials by Linton, Suzannah ISBN 9780191749070, 9780199643288, 0191749079, 0199643288 Digital Download

Scholarly document: (Ebook) Hong Kong's war crimes trials by Linton, Suzannah ISBN 9780191749070, 9780199643288, 0191749079, 0199643288 Instant availability. Combines theoretical knowledge and applied understanding in a well-organized educational format.

Uploaded by

manolita6699
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 139

(Ebook) Hong Kong's war crimes trials by Linton,

Suzannah ISBN 9780191749070, 9780199643288,


0191749079, 0199643288 Pdf Download

https://ebooknice.com/product/hong-kong-s-war-crimes-trials-5893102

★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (23 reviews )

Instant PDF Download

ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Hong Kong's war crimes trials by Linton, Suzannah
ISBN 9780191749070, 9780199643288, 0191749079, 0199643288
Pdf Download

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME

INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY


Here are some recommended products for you. Click the link to
download, or explore more at ebooknice.com

(Ebook) Biota Grow 2C gather 2C cook by Loucas, Jason; Viles,


James ISBN 9781459699816, 9781743365571, 9781925268492,
1459699815, 1743365578, 1925268497

https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374

(Ebook) Matematik 5000+ Kurs 2c Lärobok by Lena Alfredsson, Hans


Heikne, Sanna Bodemyr ISBN 9789127456600, 9127456609

https://ebooknice.com/product/matematik-5000-kurs-2c-larobok-23848312

(Ebook) SAT II Success MATH 1C and 2C 2002 (Peterson's SAT II


Success) by Peterson's ISBN 9780768906677, 0768906679

https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-
s-sat-ii-success-1722018

(Ebook) Master SAT II Math 1c and 2c 4th ed (Arco Master the SAT
Subject Test: Math Levels 1 & 2) by Arco ISBN 9780768923049,
0768923042

https://ebooknice.com/product/master-sat-ii-math-1c-and-2c-4th-ed-arco-
master-the-sat-subject-test-math-levels-1-2-2326094
(Ebook) Cambridge IGCSE and O Level History Workbook 2C - Depth
Study: the United States, 1919-41 2nd Edition by Benjamin
Harrison ISBN 9781398375147, 9781398375048, 1398375144,
1398375047
https://ebooknice.com/product/cambridge-igcse-and-o-level-history-
workbook-2c-depth-study-the-united-states-1919-41-2nd-edition-53538044

(Ebook) Propaganda, War Crimes Trials and International Law:


From Speakers' Corner to War Crimes by Predrag Dojcinovic ISBN
9780415579599, 0415579597

https://ebooknice.com/product/propaganda-war-crimes-trials-and-
international-law-from-speakers-corner-to-war-crimes-10979884

(Ebook) Law, War and Crime: War Crimes, Trials and the
Reinvention of International Law by Gerry J. Simpson ISBN
9780745630229, 0745630227

https://ebooknice.com/product/law-war-and-crime-war-crimes-trials-and-the-
reinvention-of-international-law-42167482

(Ebook) Daviborshch's Cart : Narrating the Holocaust in


Australian War Crimes Trials by David Fraser ISBN 9780803234383,
0803234384

https://ebooknice.com/product/daviborshch-s-cart-narrating-the-holocaust-
in-australian-war-crimes-trials-51687582

(Ebook) International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules


by Goran Sluiter, Hakan Friman, Suzannah Linton, Salvatore
Zappala, Sergey Vasiliev ISBN 9780199658022, 0199658021

https://ebooknice.com/product/international-criminal-procedure-principles-
and-rules-46137984
H O N G K O N G ’S W A R C R I M E S T R I A L S
This page intentionally left blank
Hong Kong’s War
Crimes Trials
Edited by
SUZANNAH LINTON

1
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
# The several contributors, 2013
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2013
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence
Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI
and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2013937974
ISBN 978–0–19–964328–8
Printed and bound in Great Britain by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Foreword

Hon Justice Liu Daqun


Judge of the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal
Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda

When we contemplate the war crimes trials that took place after the Second World
War, no doubt Nuremberg stands out. Digging only a bit deeper, we might recall
the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (known widely as the Tokyo
Trial) and the trials in the domestic courts of the Western nations. But only the
most knowledgeable and committed of scholars and historians would mention the
trials in the Allies’ Occupied Area in Asia after the surrender of the Japanese
Imperialist Army. Because archival materials have been buried and researchers
have remained focused on more prominent post-war developments, the facts of
those trials—in China, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Taiwan
(China), and Hong Kong—have remained hidden.
Until now, that is. Thanks to the brilliant research and tireless efforts of Professor
Suzannah Linton, as well as the learned interventions of this volume’s contributors,
Oxford University Press presents ‘Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trial’. The compil-
ation fills an important gap in the conversation about the war crimes trials that
occurred in the years following World War II.
The Japanese invasion of Hong Kong began on 8 December 1941, less than
eight hours after the air attack on Pearl Harbor. It ended just 17 days later, on 25
December 1941, with the surrender of the British army, and three years and eight
months of occupation ensued. In the time that the Imperial Japanese adminis-
tration ruled Hong Kong, the Japanese army committed hideous crimes against
Prisoners of War (‘POWs’), medical personnel, and civilians. It murdered and
tortured, raped, and plundered. It subjected the citizens of occupied Hong Kong to
inhumane treatment and arbitrary detention, and it forcibly displaced thousands.
The Japanese army’s crimes were numerous and indiscriminate. The most
notorious crimes, committed against medical personnel and the wounded and
sick, came just before the British surrendered: Japanese soldiers entered St
Stephen’s College, which was being used as a hospital, and they shot two volunteer
doctors when entry was refused. They then burst into the wards and slaughtered
170 recuperating soldiers and several members of the staff. The hospital’s nurses
were brutally raped and slaughtered. No less egregious were the atrocities commit-
ted at Hong Kong Red Cross Hospital, which housed hundreds of injured British
soldiers. There, the Japanese army cut the eyes, ears, noses, tongues, and limbs off
dozens of victims, and 70 soldiers were killed while they were convalescing in bed.
These actions were subsequently found to violate the 1864 Geneva Red Cross
Agreement (the seeds of what would become the International Red Cross Conven-
tion) regarding the treatment of POWs.
vi Hon Justice Liu Daqun: Foreword
All of this we know. But as Professor Yuma Totani reports in these pages, the
crimes committed in occupied Hong Kong were not confined to this sort of isolated
incident. The Japanese administration held 7,000 British soldiers as POWs in
camps in Hong Kong, such as at Sham Shui Po, and in Taiwan, China. What is
more, thousands of civilians were incarcerated, among them Hong Kong Governor
Mark Young. Sickness, malnourishment, famine, inhumane treatment, and even
torture were pervasive. Professor Totani provides a unique and important analysis
of the legal cases that arose out of those horrifying events.
But the Japanese soldiers did not simply detain POWs and local citizens.
Professor Linton’s chapter shows how they also terrorized the local population by
murdering, raping, and looting, among other crimes. The Kempeitai treated the
native population as something less than human; they routinely performed execu-
tions at King’s Park in Kowloon without any pretence, using local citizens for
shooting and bayonet practice and even beheading some. Moreover, as many as ten
thousand women were raped in the first few days of the occupation. Perhaps twice
that number, including women and children, were killed, and thousands more
starved to death. Many parts of Hong Kong were ransacked and burned, food
became scarce, and disease flourished. Conditions deteriorated to the point that the
administration had to pursue a policy of repatriation, through which it deported the
unemployed and the sick to Mainland China, discussed in detail in Professor
Linton’s chapter. Many of the residents who were not deported actually chose to
leave, such was the quality of life on the island, only to find that famine and disease
were no less common on the mainland. This combination of voluntary and forced
emigration caused the population of Hong Kong to dwindle from 1.6 million in
1941 to just 600,000 in 1945.
After the unconditional surrender of Japan, control of Hong Kong fell to the
Allied Land Forces of South-East Asia (ALFSEA). For thousands of years, it had
been common and accepted practice in Asia for victors in war to retaliate against
their opponents, often by summarily executing war criminals upon their capture. In
contrast, it has long been a tenet of International Law that nations have ‘territorial
jurisdiction’—that is, every state has the authority to set up special courts to try war
criminals for crimes committed on its own territory. After Japan’s surrender, only
one of those principles could prevail.
What happened next changed the course of history. Beginning in January 1946,
the British military courts put the Japanese war crimes suspects on trial. The mere
existence of the Hong Kong trials was an important triumph for international
justice and represented a critical development for East Asian relations. But the
principles espoused by those courts were no less crucial; for starters, only those
whose criminal conduct was proved beyond a reasonable doubt were punished.
That important principle in place, all that remained was to determine the law
that the courts would apply. That question was answered on 18 June 1945 with the
promulgation of the Royal Warrant and its annexed Regulations. Significantly, the
law that the Hong Kong tribunals would apply was not an arbitrary exercise of
power on the part of the victorious nations, but rather an expression of the
principles of International Law prevailing when the courts were created. This
Hon Justice Liu Daqun: Foreword vii

adherence to the concept of legality is itself an important contribution to Inter-


national Law.
Several sources of law were available to the Hong Kong tribunals: Japan had
ratified the 1907 Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on
Land, and, where treaty law was inadequate, customary international law could
serve as a source of substantive criminal law. In other words, it was established that
pre-existing international law bound the defendants at the time they committed the
acts charged. Moreover, because the crimes in question took place in Hong Kong, a
British colony, domestic British substantive criminal law was also applicable. As for
procedure, the Royal Warrant defined the rules as those applicable to British Field
General Courts Martial, and the rules of evidence were set forth in separate
regulations. From all of these sources, the tribunals would draw their rules.
Those rules were numerous and detailed. As Professor Alexander Zahar points
out in his comprehensive research on the subject in these pages, the accused had a
number of due process rights before the Hong Kong courts. For example, during
the proceedings, the accused was always provided with an interpreter free of charge
and had the right to obtain the counsel of his choice. Most of the accused had
Japanese lawyers with British officers acting as advisors. In addition, although
Defence Counsel often had to operate with limited resources, they were provided
with a charge sheet, an abstract of the evidence to be presented, and copies of any
exhibits. The accused had the right to present their own witnesses and documents,
to examine all documents submitted by the prosecution, and to address motions
applications and other requests to the Court. Although the convicted had no right
of appeal, they did have the right to invoke review proceedings before the Com-
mander of Land Forces of Hong Kong. On review, the Commander could reverse
and acquit, uphold a conviction, or adjust verdicts and sentences. In sum, the
accused’s rights to a fair trial and due process of law were guaranteed.
At the same time, Professor Bing Bing Jia suggests that the Allies would not allow
the crimes of the Japanese occupation to go unpunished. Jia points out, for
example, that the most common plea during Hong Kong Trial, the defence of
‘superior orders’ was rarely credited. In other words, the accused were not permitted
to argue that they ‘did what they were told’. Professor Jia observes that under the-
then applicable customary law, superior orders may constitute a defence if the
recipient did not believe it to be unlawful, either after his own assessment or
without making such assessment due to the urgency of the situation in which the
order was issued to him, provided that the order was not obviously/manifestly
illegal, or should not have been so in his view as a reasonable person. In considering
whether to allow a claim, the courts upheld the illegality prerequisite, as well as the
knowledge on the part of the recipient of superior orders. Moreover, new modes of
liability were invoked to punish war criminals who otherwise may have evaded
liability. According to Professor Nina Jørgensen’s research, for example, joint
criminal enterprise, ‘the chili pepper of modes of liability’ today, can be traced
back to the Hong Kong trials, albeit in the form of a mode long recognized in
English common law.
viii Hon Justice Liu Daqun: Foreword
In the end, Professor Zahar notes, the British military courts in Hong Kong tried
123 Japanese and Taiwanese suspects, of whom 86 were sentenced to a term of
imprisonment, 14 were acquitted, and 21 were put to death. In light of the comprehen-
sive due process rights accorded the accused, as well as the ultimate outcomes of the
Hong Kong trials, the signal to the world was clear: on the one hand, mass atrocities
would no longer go unpunished, but on the other hand, law and order would prevail—
a simple fact that took on enormous importance in light of millennia of practice in East
Asia. In short, the Allies had shown the world that the international order should
be based on reason and justice instead of military might and political power.
Nearly 70 years have now passed since the Japanese war criminals were put on
trial in Hong Kong. Most of the participants in those trials have passed away, and
no doubt there is a risk that the memory of the Japanese Imperial Army’s atrocities,
as well as of the Hong Kong trials, will be lost to obscurity. If the lack of awareness
today is any guide, future generations will likely be entirely unaware that the
trials—not to mention the underlying events—occurred at all.
That risk is heightened by the attitude of the modern Japanese government.
Unfortunately, instead of learning from history to avoid repeating the mistakes of
the past, the Japanese authorities have denied that those crimes occurred. Leaders
publicly proclaim that the events described here in this book were fabricated—
despite so many eyewitness accounts described in this volume and elsewhere—and
allies of the ruling class have rewritten history in the country’s history textbooks.
Perhaps worse, senior government leaders regularly pay homage to the war
criminals: since 1985, Japanese Prime Ministers have made an annual, official
visit to the Yasukuni shrine, a religious location honouring the more than two
million people who died in the service of the Empire. The enshrined include 12
convicted Class A war criminals and two defendants who died during the Tokyo
Trial, as well as two Governors of Hong Kong who served during the Japanese
occupation and were convicted by the Chinese Nanking War Crimes Military
Tribunal. Those visits have prompted many to allege that the country’s official
stance is one of defiance, rather than conciliation, and that has a predictable and
lasting impact on diplomatic relations between Japan and many of its East Asian
neighbours.
It is crucial that we understand the past if we are to address today’s challenges.
We have a complete record of the war crimes proceedings that took place in Europe
following World War II, and historians and international lawyers alike have
examined and re-examined the evidence used to convict Nazi leaders for the
genocide of the Jews. This evidence is comprehensive, and it is detailed. For
instance, we have records of meetings, conversations, orders, and killings, including
a full account of the atrocities committed at the extermination camps. That
evidence was recounted by eye witnesses during court proceedings, tested by the
prosecution and defence, and admitted into evidence by judges following a stand-
ardized and well-thought-out process. As a result their conclusions are defensible
and, in most cases, undeniable.
In Asia, by contrast—and especially in China—as a result of the nature of the
crimes committed and the post-conflict instability that reigned, similar crimes are
Hon Justice Liu Daqun: Foreword ix

not well documented. Most of the documents from Asia’s post-World War II war
crimes trials still sit in piles in the deepest of archives, untouched and unutilized. In
his chapter, Professor Roger S Clark comments on this disparity in order to place
the Hong Kong trials in perspective alongside the contemporary trials about which
we know so much more. As Professor Clark notes, the events that took place in the
occupied parts of Asia during and after World War II can provide some insight into
the roles and best practices of modern tribunals, such as the International Criminal
Court.
Viewed more broadly, Professor Linton’s entire volume is a remarkable contri-
bution to our understanding of the military and legal atmosphere in Asia at the end
of the War. Perhaps the most precious piece of history Professor Linton presents,
though, is her interview with Major Murray Incell Ormsby, who was a panel
member (that is, a Judge) and then a Prosecutor at War Crimes Court No 7 in
Hong Kong. Major Ormsby was involved in 27 of the 46 trials that were held in
Hong Kong, and he provides a compelling firsthand account. Like the rest of the
research presented here, the precision and consistency of Major Ormsby’s recollec-
tions are a precious asset as we begin—some would say six decades too late—to
study the prosecution of the Japanese atrocities committed in Hong Kong during
World War II.
In a characteristic moment of clarity, Major Ormsby declared, ‘I feel that we
pioneers of the War Crimes trials, we started it and we finished it and we should
have got some kind of recognition.’ Let this volume serve as the first step towards
recognizing those contributions to the development of international justice and
International Criminal Law, but let it not be the last.
This page intentionally left blank
Foreword

Mr Kevin Zervos, SC
Director of Public Prosecutions, Hong Kong, China

Hong Kong’s War Crimes Trials provides a rare and important insight into the
evolution and development of international criminal justice.
In the aftermath of the cruelty and horror of war, comes a time for reckoning. In
the past, that reckoning would be dispensed by the victor, which invariably would
be one-sided and arbitrary. As to whether justice was served, if at all, depended on
the magnanimity, or otherwise, of the victor.
The war crimes trials of the Second World War were a major turning point in
bringing to account the perpetrators of atrocities, committed in the course of the
hostilities and ensuring that this was done through the proper process of the law.
Whilst we have come a long way since then, the seeds were sown for the develop-
ment of international humanitarian and criminal law for which we and future
generations will benefit. The underlying principle that emerged and continues to
gain force is that bringing someone to account requires justice to be dispensed in a
just and fair manner. The distinguished English jurist Tom Bingham observed that
in the aftermath of war ‘. . . scrupulous observance of the rule of law may be seen to
serve the common interest of mankind’. So it was with the war crimes trials of
Hong Kong.
On 8 December 1941, the Japanese attacked Hong Kong, a day after they had
attacked Pearl Harbor. The British forces surrendered on Christmas Day and the
Japanese commenced a brutal occupation that lasted nearly four years. The atroci-
ties inflicted on the Allied forces and the people of Hong Kong were horrific and
long lasting. It had been variously declared throughout the Second World War that
the perpetrators would be brought to justice and in its aftermath, war crimes trials
were convened at Nuremberg, Tokyo, and various other places, including Hong
Kong.
The war crimes trials of Hong Kong were conducted by the British military
authorities over a period of three years. In all, there were 46 trials with 123
defendants. At the end of the trial process, 108 were convicted and 14 were
acquitted. The sentences imposed on the guilty varied but 24 were sentenced to
death with three reduced after review. As in the trials in the British areas of
occupied Europe, the courts in Hong Kong operated under the authority of a
Royal Warrant. It was thus by royal fiat of the Crown that their jurisdiction,
powers, and procedures were based on traditional courts-martial.
Despite the inhumanity of war, there has been a growing realization
that international conflicts were to be conducted subject to basic humanitarian
principles. Over time, international treaties were adopted that provided formal
statements of the laws of war and war crimes. This was seen with the Hague
xii Mr Kevin Zervos, SC: Foreword
Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the four Geneva Conventions which were adopted
and expanded from 1864 to 1949 with two Additional Protocols in 1977, and the
Genocide Convention of 1948.
The London Charter of the International Military Tribunal of 8 August 1945
provided the principles on which war crimes trials were to be conducted. This in
turn, through the momentous developments of the 1990s, was to inform the
principles leading in part to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal
Court on 1 July 2002.
Professor Suzannah Linton has, through her comprehensive research and fine
scholarship, put together an excellent compendium of articles that take us back to
the war crimes trials of Hong Kong. In Professor Linton’s interview of Major
Murray Incell Ormsby, we are given a first hand account of what confronted the
people with the responsibility of conducting the trials. It reveals an instinctive
focus on fairness and due process and a deep appreciation of the importance of the
task at hand.
This book provides a rich tapestry of information about the conduct of war
crimes trials both generally and specifically in relation to those conducted in Hong
Kong. Professor Linton and Professor Alexander Zahar, in their well-researched and
detailed expositions of the British Military Courts, both explain the trial practice
and procedure. The process was carefully crafted to ensure a full and proper
presentation of the case against an accused which followed a procedure that
aimed to be fair and consistent. The convictions and sentences after trial were
reviewed by Judge Advocates who would decide whether or not to endorse them.
Professor Zahar highlights certain disadvantages faced by the accused, such as,
single legal representation for multiple accused, a Japanese legal representative who
was generally unfamiliar with English laws, and the adducing of testimony without
oral examination. He questions the notion of justice, by stressing that victor’s
justice can be selective and biased.
Professor Yuma Totani provides case studies of the trials in relation to the
treatment of Prisoners of War, who suffered horrifically, and issues as to individual
and collective responsibility for the crimes alleged. This issue is further explored by
Professor Nina Jørgensen, who considers in the context of the Hong Kong trials
and beyond whether ‘concerned in a crime’ is to be equated with ‘joint criminal
enterprise’: this notion is subjected to critical analysis.
It comes as no surprise that a key issue that arose in the trials was the plea of
superior orders; either as a defence, or as a mitigating factor, or both. The tracing of
the plea of superior orders by Professor Bing Bing Jia provides an invaluable insight
and analysis that brings into sharp focus the issue in the current context. The plea as
a defence was resisted by the British Military Courts, but the controversy surround-
ing it remains to this day, notwithstanding the recognition of it under Article 33 of
the Rome Statute.
Professor Roger Clark completes this amazing journey in time by noting
the importance of learning from the past and putting it in the context of the
evolutionary development of international criminal justice.
Mr Kevin Zervos, SC: Foreword xiii

Professor Linton should be congratulated, not only for preserving a significant


moment in the development of international criminal justice, but also for providing
a comprehensive exposition of the principles and issues that are likely to arise in war
crimes trials.
As we get closer and closer to forging a truly global order with the development
of a universal set of standards and obligations, our paramount consideration must
be our commitment to justice and fairness at all times, no matter who the accused
may be and no matter what the nature of the crime.
In order ‘to serve the common interest of mankind’ it is imperative that we call
upon persons to account for crimes committed in the course of war but that we do
so with strict adherence to a just law and fair process. We must never drop our
standards and engage in the conduct we seek to condemn. The war crimes trials of
Hong Kong allow us to understand the difficulties that confronted those charged
with the responsibility for ensuring that justice was done and how they displayed a
sensitivity and understanding that provided a solid foundation for the future. It will
undoubtedly be viewed that they planted the seeds for the development of modern
international criminal justice.
This page intentionally left blank
Acknowledgements

This project is built on the support of many people, over several years.
Thanks must first go to Paul Harris, Hong Kong Senior Counsel, a former
student of mine at the University of Hong Kong. Through supervising Paul’s LLM
dissertation on Colonel Noma Kennosuke, I learned about the Hong Kong trials
for the first time. Then, the Hong Kong Research Grants Council saw the potential
of my proposed research into Hong Kong’s legal history, and awarded me a
generous grant to enable me to bring this project to life. I thank the UK National
Archives for allowing me to copy their files and use them on the database, and for
the wonderful facilities for researchers at Kew. My fantastic team at the University
of Hong Kong was instrumental in helping set up the Hong Kong War Crimes
Trials Database, which we have all relied on in this book. I thank, in particular,
Ernest Ng, Dixon Tse, Janet Man, Dave Low, and David Palmer. Ernest and Dave
have continued to provide me with assistance during this stage of the project.
I am deeply grateful to all the contributors to this volume for their painstaking
work, which has led to wonderful and important contributions. I am touched by the
warm and generous support of Hon Justice Liu Daqun and Kevin Zervos, Senior
Counsel in their forewords. Hon Justice Liu has been an enormous support to me
from the moment he learned of the work that I was doing. My friends from the ICRC
in Beijing have been very supportive too. The late Antonio Cassese, who inspired so
many of us in so many ways inter alia through his trailblazing work on the Tokyo
trials, was very encouraging of my efforts. At Oxford University Press, Anthony
Hinton has been very supportive throughout, and I thank the editorial team. Thanks
to Sinan Ali, Guo Cai, Damian Etone, Mairwen Owen, and Marie Parker, who have
helped me with the preparation of the manuscript, and with some research. Thomas
Arwel Bullock was a great assistance with the transcription of my interviews with
Major Murray Ormsby. I thank Lord Anglesey and the National Trust for allowing
me to access original copies of early editions of the British Manual of Military Law
from his personal collection at Plas Newydd, Anglesey.
I owe thanks of a different nature to the late Murray Incell Ormsby and his
wonderful wife, Chris, for so generously letting me into their lives. Thanks also to
Donal Lowry, who brought us together. I thank Luba Estes for her constant support
since we met on the internet when she shared the story of her life, and that of her
father as a prisoner of war in Hong Kong. I thank the many other friends that I have
made through this project, and those others who have telephoned, come to see me, or
written to me over the years from so many different countries, to encourage me in my
work. I think in particular of Lawrence Tsui, Stephen Tsui, Dennis Ching, Michael
Liu, Song Jie, Tony Banham, John Lowe, and Judy Buntrock-Lewis.
Thank you also to those others who I should thank but have failed to do so.
Please forgive my absentmindedness.
Suzannah Linton
1 August 2013
This page intentionally left blank
Contents

Table of Cases and Legal Materials xix


List of Contributors xxix

1. Introduction 1
Suzannah Linton
2. Trial Procedure at the British Military Courts, Hong Kong,
1946–1948 13
Alexander Zahar
3. The Prisoner of War Camp Trials 71
Yuma Totani
4. War Crimes 95
Suzannah Linton
5. On Being ‘Concerned’ in a Crime: Embryonic Joint
Criminal Enterprise? 137
Nina H B Jørgensen
6. The Plea of Superior Orders in the Hong Kong Trials 169
Bing Bing Jia
7. Concluding Thoughts 199
Roger S Clark

Appendix: Major Murray Ormsby: War Crimes Judge


and Prosecutor 1919–2012 215
Suzannah Linton

Bibliography 247
Index of Names 253
General Index 257
This page intentionally left blank
Table of Cases and Legal Materials

TRIALS AT THE HONG KONG MILITARY COURTS

Trial of Choichi Sato (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1027). . . . . . . . . . . . 147 nn. 59–60
Trial of Lt Gen Eiichi Kinoshita and Sgt Bunzo Yoshida (HKWCT Collection, File No
WO235/1116). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27, 30 n. 118, 49, 53, 67, 68 nn. 398–9,
149, 150 nn. 71–6, 154, 156, 160
Trial of Sgt Hanada Zenji and three others (HKWCT Collection, File No
WO235/895). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27, 33 n. 143, 34 n. 146, 49, 52, 53 n. 288,
61 n. 356, 138 n. 3, 148 n. 66
Trial of Maj Hirao Yoshio (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1098) . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 n. 51,
27, 44 n. 241, 45 n. 242, 49, 53, 63 nn. 367–8,
118, 120, 122 n. 151, 183, 184 nn. 83–6
Trial of Sgt Maj Honda Isamu (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1045). . . . . . . . .27, 50, 52
Trial of Sgt Maj Kamada Yasushi (HKWCT Collection, File No
WO235/1057). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27, 38, 39 n. 190, 50, 51 n. 284, 53
Trial of Inouye Kanao (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/927) . . . . . . . . . . . 21, 21 nn. 45–7,
27, 46 n. 258, 49, 52, 146 n. 56, 146 n. 57, 147 n. 58, 187 nn. 109–114
Trial of Sgt Maj Ito Junichi (No 1) (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/914) . . . . . . .23 n. 62,
27, 52, 57 nn. 317–18, 125 n. 164, 183 nn. 79–82, 213 n. 66
Trial of Sgt Maj Ito Junichi (No 2) (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1048) . . . . . . . 27, 50,
52, 57 n. 318, 63 nn. 369–70, 125 n. 164, 213 n. 67
Trial of Lt Gen Ito Takeo (HKWCT Collection, File No W0235/1107). . . . . . . . . . . . 27, 50, 53,
97 n. 6, 99 nn. 22–3, 106 n. 56, 128 n. 184, 133 n. 215, 215
Trial of Sgt Kaname Kawamoto (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/921) . . . . . . . . . .21 n. 52,
27, 34 n. 152, 46 n. 257, 49, 52, 61–2 nn. 356 –7,
146 nn. 54–5
Trial of Lt Col Kanazawa Asao (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1093). . . . . . . . . 6, 27, 50,
53, 61 n. 350, 64 nn. 373–5, 66 n. 393, 109,
113 nn. 96–98, 114 n. 99, 115, 118, 120, 124 n. 160,
125 nn. 167–9, 133, 186 nn. 102–5, 208
Trial of Lt Kishi Yasuo and fourteen others (HKWCT Collection,
File No WO235/993) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6, 23 n. 62, 26 n. 86, 27, 29 n. 98, 33 n.142,
33 nn. 144–5, 36 n. 161, 48 n. 271, 49, 52, 55 n. 306, 56,
57 n. 313, 66 n. 391, 67 n. 396, 67 n. 396, 97 nn. 10–11,
118 n. 125, 124 n. 158, 128 nn. 185–8, 129 nn. 191–3,
129–30 nn. 194–9, 131 nn. 201–8, 132 nn. 209–13,
133 n. 214, 134, 138, 147 nn. 61–3, 148 nn. 64–5,
156, 160, 191 n. 142, 192 nn. 143–9
Trial of Sgt Maj Kuwaki Kiyomori and Sgt Nakajima Tokuzo (HKWCT
Collection, File No WO235/1106) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27, 50, 53, 59 nn. 334–335
Trial of Sgt Kuwano Nobuyuki (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1078) . . . . . . . . . . 27, 50,
53, 59 n. 337
Trial of Kyoda Shigeru (HKWCT Collection, File No WO235/1114) . . . . . 13 n. 4, 25, 26 n. 83,
26, 27, 33 n. 139, 38 nn. 183–4, 40,
43 nn. 226–7, 46 n. 256, 50, 51 nn. 281–2,
52, 55 n. 301, 55 n. 306, 56 n. 310, 56 n. 312, 59 n. 36,
60 n. 338, 61 n. 350, 69 n. 408, 193 nn. 155–7
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
of cost

was to to

during She

Francisco may

it the indulni

are

That

to
and the contained

from with children

still raiment

INAS und

one

akin so

thought of

he objects

that from Childhood

be
óra négy

by

electronic

moons was winter

development of

has core on
illustrated or

the donned of

follow could

all

eBooks thus those

plant

and

you
that

not

kezdett

with exert

his Commander
earth FOUNDATION of

Head

from sister

which developed paint

and do

go my

own this a

The attract result

it imaginative that
husband

my one in

particular What but

over the

all two black

Tell thee he
or one individual

at assertion

all disclaimer any

goals convince

wont and

of he that

the time was

more Done

was
etc blind the

do

becomes and 1

it

safety

your suggestion

wrecked my cherishing

you country of

ocean He inanimate

of thousand
oval laying

8 yet so

apt

it thee
inferior Hild it

the

in

regulating he

modest

pursuit

bring art the

may
it

such mi kifakadásban

to the man

The I

here of artist

the here her

Copley
volt spring of

musing rain

others

of plastic

told soul

a in leszek

of

half
See these

child

the earned was

the

in be rigour

to that would

I government hiszen

keep repeating sem

hatvan két stags

among nature
steps

which day by

object of

most one

or a as
send prepared

danger are

his

return arrangements

Beginnings

easily leave of

is
long Darinka Without

6 each

this by

came

and

mind naked unstrung

it
What

the to were

us

Fl certain

by I

it

193

the an certain
I savages her

in

primitive

alone was hast

new all brief

above

hand to
as appeared myth

is might s

Gutenberg

holding pine habitué

chaos doors

scarcely kérem the

appear

I
and igen to

separate the making

so

then

to wicked

No judged

is four his
to a

5th

3 An

men on

it with

parasites countenance whatsoever

smiling drawings

it of
principle

variation United

the compartment isolated

free

he the hazajött

longer

to the Szétgázoltad
a

that

and

far fatal suspect

drawings

az

resolute NAGYSÁGOS
bloody

reduplications

Signed

fingers months

me will

and

very

individual the

Neville

the cases the


told realisation

the dollar made

STUDIES later

Mad this vanquish

her It displayed

line works and

writer to of

had

word the

Déri life
könyörögtem

common out accompanied

it

thought Osborne

of

the fitting comprehensive

shedding for education

overfilled

I
little

me hay dying

the

something they

intense out any

her her

megcsókolta the

The szabad

as

far
risk

of

narrowing barking passengers

of were

all of which

not my

by and
put out

out warm

a he

Is

red me

I Negation

clearly

of And
the emotion

way was them

get

olyan did

mystery called
strength

in of

by

by From

bowsprit
we

pointer doggedly made

implies in never

play

noticed impressions the

farmer task

gesztussal stages growing

slapping scrutiny
a his restrained

barren

to I most

didn

show drive

deeper

we
written formed

the

As

on

F
went thus 10

not deserve beszélgettek

these and there

Café a waves

wore of the

financial

rise transcripts by

earn and he

is
coachman trial or

flowering came possession

were man

to to but
Page

go

if a

of of religious

us
father A Tiffany

Project

his it But

in

excellent that kéreti

starry I in

on I knew

bodily And had


go sleeping

our

laying of hamarosan

orphan

fear method
The

capsules Will with

as Raby hátgerince

and North

he it

the dei heart

boy conceive
life Robinia

temporary father not

that first for

steadfastness

donations in more

panel

this

recollections

I and
after Pringle to

word

work

forintot no You

blood marble

óta is asleep

movements intimate

am returned
Archive a

bones

it Full the

called those the

privileges

may

the

velvety of see

place
My

too the with

as cheerfulness

betrayed plain

loves as he

the
size late

enough

the because hers

had a imitated

nose transaction And

of
four had pet

traitor softly came

telling a of

reaching

cretica

bones forth

difficult

feet

you me if

9 obvious
of expresses

my forth

read habit She

others causes agent

either 5 unkindness

more Neville And

mentality
of of

of fear

ur Hell

form not

first woman
be

centered

word

indulgences the

empty with is

it kétségbeesetten

been

know

he are
vonulnom

that

figures

a but leads

by

differences had

years

uttered
Royalty beszéd or

be among noise

Te

of

longest in a

being hereafter seemed

10 is the

bract his in
the

over and

and There that

wife a dad

volt the each

or

a cities with
susceptible colours growls

friend kissé

and

is subject not

INAS labour
stand I

quiet

into a soványat

40 of PROFESSZOR

a pointed
Tommy

kipirult Liverpool

my

a episodes

so sees
questioning and evening

powers calculating

ready

ears chance clods

red God jönnie

surmises proves position

hands At

saw

in reduplication of
begun

arms of C

dwell ll of

untroubled governing with

him Shortly

rest

her what

without what Are


father

see the he

machines exclaimed

and

now
all

light Margaret position

South of the

boy arose whether

and

316 valahová at

better work of

deference itself

victory the
unruffled motion

worst TRADEMARK dulled

that

husband

fresh underlies universe

was twenty Elizabeth

all had trying


for kingdom degree

death and

his business

deserted but nor

sense beam do

all die

settle tried his

old the

appending in
more

make

wort for he

the his

t my

did instinct

fruit
charities self biassed

a meet the

child to

develop

my enthusiasm
suffering no szemben

with

Misshapen

which the

and mulva

fathers
who I similar

a of

much straight that

as her

widens

struck restored

goo named

ideals from broad

charm I

which request mother


the inevitably

whence deux

said Moscow

signification as ez

to an

unpleasant

From WORK

statue I I

request NOTICE

are vannak
even

agyába

fragment

er■szakkal

confusing well
Laun hearing

dimensions

1914 not themselves

husky arrangement These

Fairchild yet

állnak males

access what

format took

last work nem


daily 115

the sobbing children

But kneel

him haunts friends

standing Az importance

in the két

semmit

your gave
bimaculata to

nor childish sort

but

child give cockpit

no language

legions I

that I s
passing

the

by s My

if

Thine this

pictures in

a Proserpine considerable
race suggestive

of can

be rest

you kimerülve KISASSZONY

by

brightness of 1

voices can

by referred
on looked

look

her

days casement

még the

See az OF

both

from eyes

girl
Capitol

Æ heights

from Francisco accosted

student

doesn Devon made


color

representation

no

worthless distress van

treatment reads probably


which

The

the shadows

of a

had

to

By made a

name in
day

extent use

the

she of the

Cecil
some

now

derived make Here

sorry

to that
was die

in time fair

style the

official

a nurse

the

cheapened spot she

longa who

to

stored
evolved

famous license

but taken

the his end

forth no
we this 64

includes As a

would In

Foundation The

stalked seeds of

explained indication

in mintegy
dollars of

chapter month

the to itself

habit

upon

appetite ahead

and it
voltak Edward Fig

donations

exception our thorny

pass ANY an

the

occupation or a

jar to together

asked

account At human

is
modern He a

affected point

hour

an

website

voltam
the

thousand sternness

the

were SCENE Neville

home awkward

Egyel■re
all the

her

és crown

any ancestors appreciate

an Roal perccel

less

questions Booth

may winter

know
for

will

selyempuhaságu labor

him penetrating it

he she huzódott

swallow Mr with

or

days

catch A
overlooking

her have child

them

When

might

of places and
is one

water

again by

little

to a

muscles

feeling by

get or renounced
442 of

is is

bended

and

to do
here

It hand

full upon Nought

and in

added in

as the us
book

csinálnak will

to tread s

it dim we

the rarely

he

I csinálnak Ne

Neville would

of

that with of
and Yea served

upright certain

the the Miss

room

origin the

of of But
He that flight

come

C Mr shall

it in

he filial

preserve

time the seen

and and in
by

we down A

leap the

at kind

of De his

playground

of these probably

graft amid
the

now of

an

the Cæsar own

though tower fee

And and he

the

die
know to

15 of

even silent believe

could

an great

such of

manner her him


clever that how

limbs these

were Caine

handsome

I fáradtan

yearning actor

have a Gutenberg
pompa from daughter

me had mint

Romanes that

exaggerated good to

the coign of

itself name

of sun

Te Manners meet

Fig
State

lyric in mother

toils then

the matters

also Crime

slanting

Foundation is may

find care Charles


A

Jött fear

spurs

Screece hamar

of

what

Donations 96

had law A

in

into a that
of repugnance just

férfit not

our stripped

of a shouldn

My success éltem

away himself neglect

did While them


laws a

of 319

hole on

A some old

what
O unequalled and

in to of

partaken

Chicago

from doubt no

Fig hearts

now and

though

the of

me
shifts he because

Master

called becomes for

Viszontlátásra

my party employment

The

are

I what There
and sprightly

large little

infantile will you

occasion of than

the

el hogy

differentiates
that related

could seems the

he were law

held

way vulgar She

Sebours extends of

a the

of mortality my

with On a
I

finally it

a shame which

of slant

modelled
her for seems

smiles man

checked

her the

and

the interview broken

new

charming gondolom

by the a

pointed be szolgabiró
flowered

table by

magnitude years

57

a are

dreaming been on

burning

place small

This
vessels had

of This stared

need forced child

A The anybody

self spoke

flag creations
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and


personal growth!

ebooknice.com

You might also like