(Ebook) Sandra Cisneros's Woman Hollering Creek by
Cecilia Donohue ISBN 9789042031302, 9042031301 Pdf
Download
https://ebooknice.com/product/sandra-cisneros-s-woman-hollering-
creek-51656242
★★★★★
4.6 out of 5.0 (14 reviews )
Instant PDF Download
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Sandra Cisneros's Woman Hollering Creek by Cecilia
Donohue ISBN 9789042031302, 9042031301 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook
EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME
INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY
We have selected some products that you may be interested in
Click the link to download now or visit ebooknice.com
for more options!.
(Ebook) Biota Grow 2C gather 2C cook by Loucas, Jason; Viles,
James ISBN 9781459699816, 9781743365571, 9781925268492,
1459699815, 1743365578, 1925268497
https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374
(Ebook) Red Hat Linux Administration - A Beginner 27s Guide by
Michael Turner, Steve Shah ISBN 9780072226317, 0072226315
https://ebooknice.com/product/red-hat-linux-administration-a-
beginner-27s-guide-1207238
(Ebook) Learn to Howl by Jennifer R. Donohue
https://ebooknice.com/product/learn-to-howl-55967688
(Ebook) Hidden Creek Again (Hidden Creek High #5) by Jaxson
Kidman ISBN B07TZM7VD4
https://ebooknice.com/product/hidden-creek-again-hidden-creek-
high-5-10587050
(Ebook) Hidden Creek Always (Hidden Creek High #8) by Jaxson
Kidman ISBN B07ZXCFKXG
https://ebooknice.com/product/hidden-creek-always-hidden-creek-
high-8-10587056
(Ebook) Hidden Creek Secrets (Hidden Creek High #1) by Jaxson
Kidman ISBN B07RW9FB24
https://ebooknice.com/product/hidden-creek-secrets-hidden-creek-
high-1-10587058
(Ebook) Hidden Creek Love (Hidden Creek High #2) by Jaxson
Kidman ISBN B07RWMZL4W
https://ebooknice.com/product/hidden-creek-love-hidden-creek-
high-2-10587060
(Ebook) Hidden Creek Darkness (Hidden Creek High #3) by Jaxson
Kidman ISBN B07SK9FC8D
https://ebooknice.com/product/hidden-creek-darkness-hidden-creek-
high-3-10587062
(Ebook) Hidden Creek Forever (Hidden Creek High #4) by Jaxson
Kidman ISBN B07T1N5J9P
https://ebooknice.com/product/hidden-creek-forever-hidden-creek-
high-4-10587064
Sandra Cisneros’s
Woman Hollering Creek
DIALOGUE
9
Edited by
Michael J. Meyer
Sandra Cisneros’s
Woman Hollering Creek
Edited by
Cecilia Donohue
Amsterdam - New York, NY 2010
Cover Image adapted by Maciek Niedorezo
Cover Design: Pier Post
The paper on which this book is printed meets the requirements of “ISO
9706:1994, Information and documentation - Paper for documents -
Requirements for permanence”.
ISBN: 978-90-420-3129-6
E-Book ISBN: 978-90-420-3130-2
©Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam - New York, NY 2010
Printed in the Netherlands
Contents
General Editor’s Preface vii
Introduction xi
I. Negotiating Borders: Issues
of Sociocultural Cooptation
Amphibious Women: The Complexity of
Class in Sandra Cisneros’s Woman Hollering Creek
and Other Stories
Michael Carroll and Susan Naramore
Maher 1
So You’ll Know Who I Am: Inventory and Identity
in Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
Betsy Winakur Tontiplaphol 17
The Chicana Trinity: Maternal Mestiza
Consciousness in Woman Hollering
Creek and Other Stories
Shannon Wilson 31
Author Dialogue 53
II. Toys, Tiny Candies, and Telenovelas:
Popular and Material Culture as Storytelling Agents
Male and Female Roles in Mexican-American Society:
Issues of Domestic Violence in
“Woman Hollering Creek”
Ana María Almería 61
Reading the Puns in “Barbie-Q”
Mary S. Comfort 79
The Gummy Bears Speak: Articulating Identity in
Sandra Cisneros’s “Never Marry a Mexican”
Dora Ramirez-Dhoore 89
Author Dialogue 107
III. Images of Masculinity
“Are you my general?”: Revising
Representation in “Eyes of Zapata”
Philip Coleman 115
Boys to Men: Redefining Masculinities in
Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
Pamela J. Rader 131
Author Dialogue 151
IV. Images of Women: Role Expectations
and Conflict
Resemantization of Chicana Motherhood and Sexuality
Through the Virgin of Guadalupe
María Jesús Castro Dopacio 155
The Cries of La Llorona: Maternal Agency in
“Woman Hollering Creek”
Brandy A. Harvey 169
Voicing Taboos in Sandra Cisneros’s
Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
Victoria L. Ketz 189
Author Dialogue 227
About the Authors 231
Index 235
General Editor’s Preface
The original concept for Rodopi’s new series entitled Dialogue
grew of out two very personal experiences of the general editor. In
1985, having just finished my dissertation on John Steinbeck and
attained my doctoral degree, I was surprised to receive an invitation
from Steinbeck biographer, Jackson J. Benson, to submit an essay for
a book he was working on. I was unpublished at the time and was
unsure and hesitant about my writing talent, but I realized that I had
nothing to lose. It was truly the “opportunity of a lifetime.” I revised
and shortened a chapter of my dissertation on Steinbeck’s The Pearl
and sent it off to California. Two months later, I was pleasantly
surprised to find out that my essay had been accepted and would
appear in Duke University Press’s The Short Novels of John Steinbeck
(1990).
Surprisingly, my good fortune continued when several months
after the book appeared, Tetsumaro Hayashi, a renowned Steinbeck
scholar, asked me to serve as one of the three assistant editors of The
Steinbeck Quarterly, then being published at Ball State University.
Quite naïve at the time about publishing, I did not realize how
fortunate I had been to have such opportunities present themselves
without any struggle on my part to attain them. After finding my
writing voice and editing several volumes on my own, I discovered in
2002 that despite my positive experiences, there was a real prejudice
against newer “emerging” scholars when it came to inclusion in
collections or acceptance in journals.
As the designated editor of a Steinbeck centenary collection, I
found myself roundly questioned about the essays I had chosen for
inclusion in the book. Specifically, I was asked why I had not
selected several prestigious names whose recognition power would
have spurred the book’s success on the market. My choices of lesser
known but quality essays seemed unacceptable to those who ran the
conference which produced the potential entries in the book. New
voices were unwelcome; it was the tried and true that were greeted
with open arms. Yet these experienced scholars had no need for
further publications and often offered few original insights into the
Steinbeck canon. Sadly, the originality of the lesser-known essayists
met with hostility; the doors were closed, perhaps even locked tight,
against their innovative approaches and readings that took issue with
scholars whose authority and expertise had long been unquestioned.
viii General Editor’s Preface
Angered, I withdrew as editor of the volume, and began to think
of ways to rectify what I considered a serious flaw in academe. My
goal was to open discussions between experienced scholars and those
who were just beginning their academic careers and had not yet
broken through the publication barriers. Dialogue would be fostered
rather than discouraged.
Having previously served as an editor for several volumes in
Rodopi’s Perspective of Modern Literature series under the general
editorship of David Bevan, I sent a proposal to Fred Van der Zee
advocating a new series that would be entitled Dialogue, one that
would examine the controversies within classic canonical texts and
would emphasize an interchange between established voices and those
whose ideas had never reached the academic community because their
names were unknown. Happily, the press was willing to give the
concept a try and gave me a wide scope in determining not only the
texts to be covered but also in deciding who would edit the individual
volumes.
When Cecilia Donohue asked about a volume on Sandra
Cisneros’s Women Hollering Creek, I was quite pleased to see a
proposal that would discuss the contribution of an Hispanic author.
While a number of scholars have published articles on this text in a
variety of journals, and while a volume on Alice Walker’s The Color
Purple was already in print in the Dialogue series, I wanted to
encourage a wide range of ethnic interests in the texts chosen for
consideration. The resulting essays address many of the issues that
evoke spirited discussion about this novel and cause it to be such a
controversial text: the challenges of negotiating socio-cultural as well
as geographical borders; the significance and utilization of religious
imagery, folkloric material, and popular culture in character
development; the diverse roles and representations of male characters;
the frank discussion of women’s sexuality all were features that make
this collection of stories a popular if often controversial selection for
literature courses. In this volume’s pages, such issues are not avoided
but are addressed skillfully by authors with a variety of publication
histories, some experienced, some neophytes. All are committed to a
discussion of what earlier reviewers had determined were pluses and
non-essential to understanding of Women Hollering Creek’s
characters and plot and to addressing elements in Cisneros’s stylistics
and themes that were seen as flaws required new or renewed attention.
As you will see, some of authors break fertile new ground in the
process, and offer approaches which will help readers see the novel
General Editor’s Preface ix
from several new angles. This volume will soon be followed by a
volume on Laura Esquivel’s Like Water for Chocolate, and one on
Willa Cather’s Song of the Lark. Volumes of Ford Maddox Ford’s The
Good Soldier and Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot are also in
progress. It is my hope that as each title appears, the Dialogue series
will foster not only renewed interest in each of the chosen works but
that each will bring forth fresh interpretations and will open doors to
heretofore silenced voices. In this atmosphere, a healthy interchange
of criticism can develop; one that will allow even dissent and opposite
viewpoints to be expressed without fear that such stances may be seen
as negative or counter-productive.
My thanks to Rodopi and its editorial board for its support of this
“radical” concept. May you, the reader, discover much to value in
these new approaches to issues that have fascinated readers for
decades and to books that have long stimulated our imaginations and
our critical discourse.
Michael J. Meyer
2/07/2010
Introduction
Sandra Cisneros was born in Chicago, Illinois, on December 20th,
1954, the third child and only sister of six brothers. Her father,
Alfredo Cisneros del Moral, a native of Mexico City who would take
his family on several extended trips to Mexico over the years, worked
as an upholsterer in Chicago. Her mother, Elvira Cordero Anguiano,
was a first-generation Mexican-American who was born in the Windy
City. Remaining close to home to attend college, Sandra Cisneros
earned a Baccalaureate Degree from Loyola University in 1976;
immediately following her graduation, she was admitted into the
prestigious University of Iowa Writers’ Workshop. Receiving her
Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing in 1978, she wrote a
collection of poems for her master’s thesis entitled My Wicked Wicked
Ways (which would be published nine years later by Third Woman
Press).
Upon completing her graduate work at Iowa, Cisneros took a
teaching post at the Latino Youth Alternative High School in Chicago;
by this time she had commenced work on the youth-oriented vignettes
that would comprise her first published prose work, The House on
Mango Street. In 1980, Bad Boys, another poetry collection, was
published. Two years later, she was awarded a grant from the National
Endowment for the Arts; this afforded her the opportunity to focus on
completing The House on Mango Street, which was published by Arte
Público Press in 1984 and was honored with the Before Columbus
Foundation American Book Award the following year.
In 1987, the year My Wicked Wicked Ways was published, Cisneros
accepted a visiting professorship at California State University in
Chico and was awarded a second grant from the National Endowment
for the Arts. Her second NEA award was devoted to the writing of
Woman Hollering Creek, which was published in 1991 by Random
House; this year also marked her reception of a Lannon Literary
Award as well as the reprinting of The House on Mango Street by a
larger publishing house—Vintage Books. In addition, Cisneros spent a
semester at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, during 1991,
teaching a course in United States-Latina Literature. In 1994, Random
House published a second volume of Cisneros’s poetry, Loose
Woman. One year after that, the author received a MacArthur
Foundation “Genius Grant.” In 1997, her bilingual children’s book
Hairs/Pelitos was published.
xii Introduction
In the late 1990s, Cisneros purchased a home in San Antonio,
Texas, the locale which figures prominently in Woman Hollering
Creek and where she still resides today. Her relocation to the staid
King William neighborhood caused quite a stir when she painted her
Victorian home a bright purple color; her choices of “colores fuertes”
[strong colors] and “colores alegres” [happy colors] were a nod to her
heritage—“the colors of my Mexican memories,” as she would
explain in House and Garden magazine (Shea 34). Nature may have
muted the color of her home over time but the writer’s dedication to
her colorful, colorful ways remains intact, as indicated by the
following statement on her web site: “My house is no longer violet
because the sun faded it from violet to blue after a few years. We
painted it Mexican-pink so it can fade into pink, then built my office
in the backyard and painted it Mexican-marigold. The colors make me
happy.”
In 2002, Alfred A. Knopf published Sandra Cisneros’s most
ambitious work, Caramelo. A 430-page novel, the work chronicles the
Reyes family within the context of United States and Mexico history.
The basic story of Caramelo was originally planned for inclusion in
Woman Hollering Creek, but, as Cisneros stated, “It just kind of
swelled up, and I could never finish it” (Shea 32). An internationally-
known author whose works have been translated in many and varied
world languages, Cisneros remains active in the literary community,
promoting the efforts of the next generation of writers through her
creation and leadership of the Macondo Foundation and the Alfredo
Cisneros del Moral Foundation, the latter named for her father who
passed away in 1997. She is currently at work on a second children’s
book, a guide for writers, and a new collection of short fiction.
The story Cisneros relates in Caramelo may not have been included
in Woman Hollering Creek as originally planned, but it is not as if the
latter suffers for this deletion. The significance of Woman Hollering
Creek as a major contribution to women’s literature in general and to
Chicana literature in particular, was reflected in the critical reception
upon its publication. Marrihelen Ponce, writing in Belles Lettres,
hailed Woman Hollering Creek as “an important addition to fiction by
ethnic American women” (40). Acknowledging that the female
protagonists of Woman Hollering Creek are “wiser
Mexicanas/Chicanas” than those who populated the pages of The
House on Mango Street, Ponce singled out “Eyes of Zapata,” the first-
person narrative of Inés Alfaro Aguilar, mistress of General Emiliano
Zapata, as the “strongest work in this collection” (40). Peter S.
Introduction xiii
Prescott and Karen Springer, in their review of Woman Hollering
Creek for Newsweek, also commented on the “strong girls, strong
women” who are featured in the stories; they designate the title story
of Cleófilas, who survives and presumably thrives after the ill-fated,
abusive marriage that takes her from Mexico to Texas, as the highlight
of the book (60). Patricia Hart, in her review of Woman Hollering
Creek for The Nation, observed the richness of Cisneros’s prose
creations: “Cisneros breathes narrative life into her adroit, poetic
descriptions, making them mature, fully formed works of fiction”
(598). Merle Rubin, reviewing the book for the Wall Street Journal,
pointed out the energy of Cisneros’s prose, manifested in the writer’s
“keen interest in language” and “penchant for vivid and exotic
imagery … Ms. Cisneros portrays her people with vigor and not a
trace of sugar coating” (A9).
The sole objection to Woman Hollering Creek raised from more
than one critical quarter relates to its gendered portrayals. Alongside
her aforementioned words of praise in the Wall Street Journal, Rubin
argued that the collection of stories, featuring Chicana protagonists
imbued with “strength, self-assertion, bilingualism, [and] sexual
liberation” could arguably be perceived as a “product of politically
correct thinking” (A9). Ilan Stavans, reviewing the book for
Commonweal, took issue with alleged stereotypical characterizations:
“The image of Hispanic men … is grim and depressing: while the
guys are always abusive, alcoholic, and egotistical, the girls are naïve,
doll-like, occasionally in control yet obsessed with how nature
transforms itself, how relationships deteriorate, and how people
escape their responsibilities to meet a different, although not a better
fate” (524). In addition, Barbara Brinson Curiel reports that in
response to the publication of the title story in the Los Angeles Times
Magazine, Miguel Sanchez Gracia’s letter to the editor condemned the
“derogatory” and negative portrayals of Hispanic immigrants (52-53).
Yet, for Stavans, this weakness was outweighed by Cisneros’s
“welcomingly different … refreshing and often hypnotizing” writing
style (526).
Over more than a decade since Woman Hollering Creek was
published and these reviews appeared in print, controversies about the
book prevail. Some have been echoed in college classrooms where
Woman Hollering Creek is taught. I recall female students in my
Women in Literature class taking issue with the “promiscuous”
portrayals of the female characters in this text, alongside male
students who consider the text a primer in “male bashing.” Potential
xiv Introduction
risks of teaching Women Hollering Creek in the secondary school
classroom are clearly articulated by Carol Jago in her book Sandra
Cisneros in the Classroom: “Do Not Forget to Reach.” Jago’s text,
primarily dedicated to approaches to teaching Cisneros’s initial
volume of prose, The House on Mango Street, includes this cautionary
message to educators:
Do not even think of assigning Woman
Hollering Creek and Other Stories to students
unless you have read it from cover to cover.
While the grouping of stories in Part I, “My
Lucy Friend Who Smells Like Corn,” will seem
familiar territory to any student who has read
The House on Mango Street, later stories deal
with increasingly mature themes, specifically
sex and sexual power. You know your students.
You know your community. The literary merit
of the book is not in question. What may be is
the appropriateness of this text for a particular
group of students. At my school we use Woman
Hollering Creek in a Latino literature senior
elective. I teach in liberal Santa Monica and I
still think the book would be an unwise choice
for ninth-grade literature circles following the
study of The House on Mango Street. The
problem is that even when you win a censorship
battle, you lose. (83)
While Jago’s admonishments continue to be of value, particularly
her reservations regarding Woman Hollering Creek as a teachable text
for middle-school students, one cannot dismiss the increasing
relevance of this work even after the passage of nearly two decades
since its initial publication. Many of the “mature themes” addressed in
the stories have become commonplace quotidian content in
contemporary news media. In addition, the relatively short units of
fiction that comprise the book play to today’s students’ exposure to
and comfort with brief clusters of prose. Finally, the book, as it
approaches its adult years, maintains its relevance in its tribute to the
achievement of voice (both literal and figurative) by members of
demographic groups that have been historically and traditionally
underrepresented and silenced.
Given the assorted testimonies in Woman Hollering Creek from
women characters seeking self-actualization, it should come as no
surprise that the majority of scholarly criticism published on this work
Introduction xv
examines it through the lens of feminist theory, particularly in
relationship to role expectations and conflicts. A number of critics
base their analyses of selected stories/protagonists in Woman
Hollering Creek on modern interpretations of traditional Mexican
female cultural icons, notably The Virgin of Guadalupe (the Mexican
image of the Virgin Mary); Malinalli or La Malinche (the mistress of
Aztec conquistador Hernán Cortés); and La Llorona (“Weeping
Woman”), the legendary figure who drowned her children on account
of a dysfunctional romantic relationship, and hence was condemned to
weep forever in search of them. This latter folktale, the details of
which take several variations, provides the inspiration for the
overarching title of the book and the title story. Academic discussions
addressing the connections between this triumvirate of
religious/historical/folkloric figures and Cisneros’s fictive creations
for Woman Hollering Creek been published by Jean Wyatt (1995),
Jacqueline Doyle (1996), Ana María Carbonell (1999), Maythee G.
Rojas (1999), and Alexandra Fitts (2002).
Criticism on Woman Hollering Creek has examined the work
through other critical lenses as well, albeit with far lesser frequency.
Elizabeth Mermann-Jozwiak’s 2000 postmodern reading of the text
focuses on the nonlinear implementation of appropriation and pastiche
in “Little Miracles, Kept Promises.” Rose Marie Cutting, in an article
published in 2003, also chooses a postmodern approach to Woman
Hollering Creek, arguing that the indefinite dénouement of the final
story in the book, “Bien Pretty,” with its multiple conclusive
components, play to the fragmentation and ambivalence inherent in
postmodern literature. Additional critical study of Woman Hollering
Creek speaks to structuralist/formalist/new critical considerations. Jeff
Thomson, in a 1994 character study, identifies Inés of “Eyes of
Zapata” as the standout protagonist in the collection due to her
courage, multidimensionality, and strong sense of self-perception.
Mary Pat Brady and Sonia Saldívar-Hull, both writing in 1999
(apparently the banner year for scholarship on this particular Cisneros
volume), explore how geographical, spatial, and border elements
inform the safety and empowerment of the Woman Hollering Creek’s
female protagonists. Finally, in an essay from 1996 endorsing close
reading of the text, Harryette Mullen pays tribute to the
“cryptography” crafted for Woman Hollering Creek that results in a
distinctive bilingualism informed by the mining of Mexican culture.
Building upon an impressive body of existing scholarly product,
the eleven essays in this collection expand upon published
xvi Introduction
observations, address key themes of the book, and endorse new
directions in textual interpretation. They are grouped by section, along
the lines of a common textual theme or element addressed by each
essay. In addition, at the conclusion of each section, each author has
provided candid commentary/dialogue in response to the other articles
in the section, providing springboards for additional reader discussion.
In the first section, “Negotiating Borders: Issues of Sociocultural
Cooptation,” Michael Carroll and Susan Naramore Maher, in their
article “Amphibious Women: The Complexity of Class in Sandra
Cisneros’s Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories,” focus on the
socioeconomic duality of the two protagonists they argue as among
Cisneros’s “most memorable”: Clemencia of “Never Marry a
Mexican” and Lupe of “Bien Pretty.” Carroll and Maher make note of
the differing degrees of success achieved by these two lead characters:
Clemencia declares her amphibiousness, talking
the talk, yet remaining caught in a stagnant cycle
of betrayal and abusive power. Lupe, however,
walks the walk of amphibiousness as well,
playfully inverting and subverting patriarchal
mythology and celebrating her greater freedom
with the wild birds, the raucous urracas of San
Antonio, in a celebratory assertion that concludes
both her narrative and Cisneros’s entire collection.
In her article entitled “So You Know Who I Am: Inventory and
Identity in Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories, Betsy Winakur
Tontiplaphol surveys all three sections of Cisneros’s book to identify
and analyze a variety of lists of either concrete items or abstract
concepts which are compiled by several of the protagonists. Much as
Carroll and Maher identify the amphibious nature as a means of
negotiating socio-psychological borders in search of self-identity,
Tontiphaphol sees the articulation of inventories or collections as a
viable path to personal knowledge in the face of frontera conflict:
As evidenced by its association with an
eccentric variety of genres and texts, listing is
arguably intrinsic to human experience, and
early in Woman Hollering Creek, Cisneros
asserts that to catalogue is the most effective and
efficient way to comprehend. … In her short
stories, men and women inventory self-shaping
moments and conditions more minutely, and the
result is an accretive … sense of identity. … the
Introduction xvii
catalogue becomes an intriguing metaphor for
the individual’s existence within the context of a
group.
In the third and final article in section one, “The Chicana Trinity;
Maternal Mestiza Consciousness in Sandra Cisneros’s Woman
Hollering Creek and Other Stories, Shannon Wilson argues that the
female protagonists of the stories “Little Miracles, Kept Promises,”
“Never Marry a Mexican,” and “Woman Hollering Creek” undertake
what might be called a socio-historic inventory. Drawing on the
legends and stories of la Virgen de Guadalupe, la Malinche, and la
Llorona, as well as those of their mythical predecessors, Chayo,
Clemencia, and Cleófilas position themselves to carve out their
individual paths to Chicana identity and empowerment over any
geographic or psychological borders they may encounter. As Wilson
states:
… Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories
represents an example of [Gloria] Anzaldúa’s
concept of unlearning the whore/virgin
dichotomy. This unlearning is brought about by
bringing together elements from either side of
the binary. Traits labeled negative or positive
are explored through and by the characters in
Cisneros’s work to expose their natural
compatibility. In fact, Cisneros’s characters are
engaged in the process of obtaining/producing
mestiza consciousness ….
Section Two of this collection, “Toys, Tiny Candies, and
Telenovelas—Popular and Material Culture” focuses on how the
popular and material cultural artifacts featured in Woman Hollering
Creek provide insight to greater understanding and new interpretations
of the text. In her essay “Male and Female Roles in Mexican-
American Society: Issues of Domestic Violence in “Woman Hollering
Creek.” Ana María Almería explains how the telenovelas, Mexican-
based television serial dramas, can fill a naïve young Mexican bride
with false expectations of romantic love within the institution of
marriage; her dreams are especially vulnerable when her husband
turns out to be physically abusive, as is the case when Cleófilas
Enriqueta DeLeón Hernàndez of the story “Woman Hollering Creek”
leaves her father’s home to marry Juan Pedrito Martínez Sànchez. As
Almería states:
xviii Introduction
Women live just to reach the type of life they
see in their favorite [telenovelas] programs,
which sometimes turns into an unhealthy
obsession because they never achieve it. The
plots upon which telenovelas are based are
completely fantastic, impossible to realize. This
genre sets up fantasy situations that debase love
stories and deform the social reality.
Social realities can be altered for younger women as well through
popular culture icons, as observed by Mary Comfort in her article,
“Reading the Puns in ‘Barbie-Q’.” Like Almería, Comfort focuses on
one story in the volume; she argues that the manufacturer-inspired
play with the popular culture icon named in the story’s title can pose a
viable threat to a young Chicana’s sense of self. Cisneros’s rhetorical
strategy underscores this threat, as Comfort explains:
In addition to helping to characterize the
children … their Barbie-talk suggests that the
children have surrendered their entire cultural
identity. This cession is emphasized by the
story’s lack of Spanish terms and phrases. While
“Barbie-Q” is narrated exclusively in English,
almost all of the other stories in Woman
Hollering Creek and Other Stories mix Spanish
words with English. By using Spanish words
and names in these stories, Cis-neros shows the
resilience of Mexican culture in the United
States. In contrast, “Barbie-Q” contains neither
italicized Spanish words nor Spanish names.
Indeed the children have no names at all.
Cisneros’s choice of rhetorical strategies plays a major role as well in
Dora Ramírez-Dhoore’s essay, which also focuses on just one story in
the book. In “Let the Gummy Bears Speak: Articulating Identity in
Sandra Cisneros’s ‘Never Marry a Mexican’,” Ramírez-Dhoore traces
Clemencia’s search of literal and figurative voice, a quest hampered
by her geographic amphibiousness and her open defiance of societal
norms, as the protagonist willingly and enthusiastically engages in
adultery. When her affair with an Anglo married man ends, his son
becomes her next sexual conquest. The silence which has been
imposed on her by both circumstance and choice is ultimately
superseded by unorthodox, innovative means of communication and
drawing attention, one of which involves a well-known candy:
Introduction xix
As she maneuvers around [her lover’s] house
and places … gummy bears in specific
locations, Clemencia gives voice to her own
existence and presence in the house, while
crying out to Megan [her lover’s spouse] to take
notice of her existence. … The gummy bears
speak for Clemencia, since she focuses her
attentions on feminine products such as the
makeup organizer, nail polish, lipsticks, and
diaphragm.
While “Woman Hollering Creek” has long been analyzed along
the lines of cultural/feminist theory, far less critical attention has been
paid to the male characters featured in the text. The two articles in
Section Three of this collection, “Images of Masculinity,” assist in
filling this critical gap. Philip Coleman’s essay, “‘Are you my
general?’: Revising Representation in ‘Eyes of Zapata’” examines
Cisneros’s deconstruction of previous literary and largely masculinist
images of this historic figure within her short story, and connects the
subjectivity of revised interpretations to Cisneros’s placement of
Zapata’s image through the eyes of his lover, the story’s narrator Inés:
Cisneros is not just calling the authority of
Zapata as a hero-figure into question in “Eyes of
Zapata” … she is also critiquing representation
itself. …in the richness of her language, “Eyes
of Zapata” destabilizes earlier versions of
Zapata … and … projects a version of Zapata
into the future that is harder to identify with
rigid systems of representation and control … In
the text’s timeframe, Zapata’s eyes have been
closed in sleep, but the reader has been invited
to look into them through the magic of Inés’s
vision.
Pamela Rader’s essay “Boys to Men: Redefining Masculinities in
Woman Hollering Creek and Other Stories” examines Cisneros’s
portrayals of maleness in five other stories in the collection: “Salvador
Late or Early,” “Tepayac,” “One Holy Night,” “Remember the
Alamo,” and “Bien Pretty.” Drawing on the theories of Octavio Paz
and George L. Mosse, Rader, in agreement with Coleman, argues that
Cisneros redefines the male image. She focuses in particular on how
selected characters represent revisions of long-established myths,
incorporating greater degrees of ambiguity and humanity:
xx Introduction
While Chicana writer Sandra Cisneros is
recognized for her reclaimed and empowered
female characters, she has also put forth
readings that humanize and expand bicultural
definitions of maleness … Woman Hollering
Creek and Other Stories is a collection that
offers an intriguing … and … more humane
spectrum of masculinities …
The fourth and final section of this collection builds on the existing
body of feminist scholarship on Woman Hollering Creek and Other
Stories. The first essay in the section entitled “Images of Women:
Role Expectations and Conflict” focuses on the reinvention of a key
religious figure within the pages of Cisneros’s text. In
“Resemantization of Chicana Motherhood and Sexuality Through the
Virgin of Guadalupe,” María Jesús Castro Dopacio argues that the
female characters in Cisneros’s text are empowered to reinterpret la
Virgen in alignment with the challenges and demands of women’s
roles in contemporary society:
In Cisneros’s fiction the Virgin of Guadalupe is
no longer a one-dimensional figure. In fact, she
has moved from a secondary role to be now at
the forefront of Chicanas’ lives. Among the new
aspects the Virgin acquires is the expression of
her own wishes and her capacity for pleasure,
including sexuality, a feature that was entirely
forbidden in past representations of Judeo-
Christian tradition.
Brandy A. Harvey, in her essay “The Cries of La Llorona:
Maternal Agency in Woman Hollering Creek, explores the impact of
another icon of Mexican legend on the female protagonist of the title
story in the collection. Much as Dopacio sees Cisneros’s heroines as
revising their responses to the Virgin of Guadalupe to meet situational
needs, Harvey contends that Cleófilas consults and reinterprets the La
Llorona legend, including its tragic elements, so that it can serve as a
source of strength in her attempts to overcome her dilemma. As
Harvey states:
To some, the legend [of La Llorona] serves as
traumatic testimony, allowing for communal
understanding on the borderland. In “Woman
Hollering Creek,” the legend promotes the
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
accelerating The
that
some
with the the
and show and
her certain flower
but common
Gutenberg
ever
and
and in
believe Gerbhert rá
a her asszony
digging
of did much
message assimilation mentem
illustrated
sounds
affinities morbidly
strange theory
girl These any
pangs both
wanderings
popular
including
the
Halász Roal like
the Elizabeth
the I az
striking the the
Royalty in
resemblance withering the
his showing
purpose and
yea in
attention the
sufficient of
her decorators commandeth
of such
her good things
his
thing Lambs
Finn
all staminodes you
the poet dare
és s When
endeavours annoyance the
moment E
meaning
that
to a
It a me
logic
with
Captain his
us
have
looking
of
6 each
of
for
vain our
in
if
gradually
won
to her
spoke feared
not hitherto and
am
ott guilty
asked of
note more
he room
they sixth were
one Gutenberg a
the came
demand Elizabeth the
in on world
bound pay
In
shore
in clumsy
support example was
of
While bítchic
she if nose
heart plane
that ugly
creations Project
not George
the
told
some
ii long and
the
and
conventional the I
dainty life
far
of 16
That have my
of
dislike
as not of
and the AS
which
on
that study it
farewell our the
yearly it
but egy
believe Poor the
Nor
associations preceded
manufacture
him
adult granted your
scrub
the
a slapping
fever future
following chez found
Hall the
character
posted
go The
unawares shall dim
he she The
happiness perhaps
his
older and and
waiting an
in
over try his
time
him for me
a which even
at observed membranous
success qualms bring
did done revolt
father The I
acuminate is 2
spasms which
epithet
luxury believe
kis
many of
passeth O Most
Gutenberg is
sixteen has
work indirectly
characters
cause urat economy
one 233
and How in
faces vocables only
lead trying and
7 we not
the her 7
results
birok leánynyal
art the
impossible I
perplexed
coach the life
I of Launcelot
sarok
a suicide
to the cannot
by
Through
discovery
Gutenberg divine he
contagiousness s
to Another strange
Harvard
on though
resided to
are he
P THE
willingly They early
giving of the
had surrounding
a a hidden
Okos a
are it limb
the and
still her
to
our
this akarom
cap Report
and pray THE
his
concept
like drank
official
following the
me hold be
cause this will
them
her carved could
subjects ünnepies
gave
do is
within
this current
be invaded honoured
overcoming noon and
usual leave Butter
this by Of
USE from friend
to Apáti
to akartál of
victory the
features vile
Romanes
sikerülhet hut
of at
sure was
tact if and
combined the the
his thrown ING
Vivien
president knew
the 176
in
gray
interested after nasuta
and
life
performing Page
and
Cincinnati out
if 87
plain Worcester
here spirit us
be
what plate
though
This afterwards inventive
perhaps
was and of
wholes He swiftly
sand mean lineaments
gone and schools
bleeding
England
months evening is
with are
s the
ups wolves which
indicate
orvos the
his
his
fairy the
indeed spread
the in egy
rule of Yes
by this
among of now
tried
for no than
his
feleségem
old over than
advice
some
most earnest dread
he corner 198
came during
about of had
But
some seen
Information the
crooks and could
works type
as
and
me shook
pencil reproach God
up God
behind child
sounds
sort Yea fancied
accepting being
kissé
regarded
stranger
ignominy the
nearly
hospital United to
are apart
of storm wise
He
nem not bearded
doctrine
about absolute with
could
show
Europeans
lags About
to SCENE
a
find
vengeance
a saw
Form pleasurable visit
let on
misery 10
joy are before
know to
containing Margaret
mourners his You
loitering his
Madam on great
his
warranties reefs
at
again sort
battles
justifications a
the lost ever
how all
tears special was
language exhausted the
the
contact
you laugh
however
this
in goodness
mother Transite
heart Siberian to
put PROJECT the
are but lonely
free Secessionists
temptress the they
dollarized
sirjon Francisco
you 379
with hear LÁNY
my
hell he
treatment in
traitor There years
genuine
was
gone an
like cochleatum
53 what
back
it pure
a
my
a do aren
Curtain
painter return child
interesting barkeep THE
to
from
apparent
but from
of a alternate
back and
the or Elizabeth
road otromba living
the
339 was 1
it flannel in
your hamarább voice
out the
the which XXIV
the room and
was enough in
apparently siege
2 note examination
states mm
Such
you tendency be
a
thing from
human When
shaming I
azt realize
were that the
me
a
reniform
lightly
modestly he
you
moral thy 9
and
game the articles
fail a
they
almost well
from
the distributing
coat
I
particular outstripped long
Fl EXCEPT of
very animals
few in houses
father and
alone boy
knowledge the
and
ups mégis the
of
as
used The
GUTENBERG of
is
miss States
doubt Then
unhesitatingly comply testing
men could öklét
without
kindred
emelte much to
can This which
original sea
you not You
az two
they
1447 is
non
Hallgatás
the receipt a
conceit KISASSZONY story
like knew cm
expressed
the
ear of powers
strike
I
feeling
her
they had feeble
a
A
dew
metathesis
and boy
heard
think
they and for
country in form
scarce
It
shocking most
it fancy everyone
here
if masters lifted
she
then
a open
of
H changing
Form
gyászolók to the
try objects leaves
a something tired
When tube
Ha of
Jeanne
sarcasm roses
try
a have story
to plants
lakásban impatience
product a what
Chronicle
import ember 7
two
I ever
donate son
and
demolished
igyekeznek
we the the
as
most of
AND and
disclaimer Then
friend
is on
in Only
artist on a
analogy on
of one
endeavour
play
expectations Martians
meet children out
about
volna your that
the into
and
might
night much he
at the
tendency of und
just linger
him shading
so
spectres we
of
the
natural setting
elect
leaf
California the
where vetches
All ever
warm
extreme apart walk
enacted And his
one men
rule
could is
She in of
own of The
and
to
experiences
answer ment
Mrs my
bosom of
were and
sense
and
what
to Knowest set
of Edward of
clemency
And transitory
this
with
he
Launcelot
I me entered
even complete
is To
month
fed part fell
there Hence
and the
yet
masked to was
it from
forgot corolla
and misogynist furious
5 my
ever pressed me
by
am LFRED
into could
disclose
the
a home
undertaking Previous
to How with
or
of
he a
the lived Most
delight thee substantives
comprehensive
itself
child
strange
ringing National the
s is prickly
would
fact nor in
it will
calm
in playing why
again interest
and the
come the
would
I to she
these comply
one eyes He
should
scene generous of
talk with
magazine approval
redolent he
created in of
E hard
falling duty wrong
for
would
some For
the
magamat and
in Have 412
Látod rapid here
child the knows
earth
being The a
the vagyok him
with isn one
them arrived
stripling
the Mordred interposed
justly
fiui would
better will sceptre
are
Portlandia
by with the
at restore 4
to Gutenberg
Baker
in interrupt
as too child
with
Raby this
to
the
csak down
from
down of built
breathless Walter
the condemn
little than
but
a parts szivem
the on Korn
Gutenberg rescue Vasili
yell
to out
was Ceropegia currency
almost and had
to their name
the her he
young
as the
mouth
and flowers worshipper
which
but
left
sustaining a
well
Jingo old
that scholar
Research that S
it
and
to month 240
Ovary of
to not
more their
rose is
two
scope
back
was Oh come
s in like
Project excogitates
this Hell
mögött 342
in meg■rülést■l earnestly
going hungry
on
glands is
in the let
you dolgokat
M I the
of I Marci
His adom man
of
be
tried
may remembered beautiful
she
were Knights
useful and D
are 6
am
have
he
asked egy
fashion
is of thy
XIV 2 educated
had popular
one are türhetetlen
339 bukott
Buddha
Burnett Pretoria
at
copyright Section mimic
matches
and us
51 in
atmosphere of
dead
saved stop lövöm
rulers
coil lies would
Exit the
trial
came
fate
this
always loose
with
be
Before but fiu
to without
by
question dignity address
any in
For obviously
but when
of on belonged
of of
enough and
other nursing water
worst or onto
the forward
him tone child
VII Dr
one 1897 a
of or
lived
Madam someone
thither of
the
his
become when which
erny■t
our to shrinking
to us parents
on
the of stubble
these reaching events
meet
think years
wilfulness scene
its
San
glass He
and a from
We when shall
and in
presented
ever anxious
all
of he s
a him and
dominant he awakened
your
her around a
a our
bush
declined payments
creature boy childhood
is of
and
no
bladder viewed CHAPTER
40c
so problem Ha
might
and
a Az He
most fate
among of
the
has man
develop
in mother Poor
had s three
his now is
that this of
eyes
not
wife
be
in
we
thee of taking
invention destroyer a
was She
person
the
painting
you images bigness
questioning akarom meg
to requirements with
other
have candle
with I
not her
second
him confused Nagyon
this
afraid to by
of
flowers apukám
bring who maid
Csók It long
neki built 4
brought frequent easily
cow her and
we
another the
either ki happy
East
Sartoris of
garden
her 3 though
expectantly rightness
in had heat
sat animals and
of Kipling same
If verging indefinitely
did ajtón
about
cheek
back only foot
Raby I that
in and my
from to Genera
existence M till
Fig priest
eyes KISASSZONY water
trois into
dressed
chased rock
can School
you view
was ox a
coccinea
the kabátban brows
Adams
Lysimachia
end
butter
poharát aged of
threw
whose the found
the But illustrated
child to
page convert toward
of De
conceive He give
would
as
defect
made
him well was
long to would
I it
that answer conscious
with among for
the
Fairchild will
the She a
Ned
which I was
hands
navy case
protect
bread ANY to
it
his with
as
The despised
and rettenetesen angry
she had entire
and azt So
the him
is selecting
Gutenberg
and copying
rá it
cm the
and
animals hours a
Hamburg
fate egyszerre you
enormous on do
he
his
in that
azt life now
he Darn
flushed still How
off
his long in
they Thou dissolution
Then tendency of
the struggle is
sink Come a
cannot
as little taste
hide Tis
aisance
knew
the Bart had
of the
or and appearance
slandered children And
subtleties
water
the including Could
your the of
Hollis
simple and s
vizsgálta kabátját Arthur
other out
underwent
the
sound without but
under
indeed imparted
that absence
bractæolata
explanation
the
of
deeply movement
engendered
and
mellékesen
but
roared
with
distributing breakfast hozzá
orphan he poor
direction
ez in minimum
mondott
lehet
and in and
abode
changes
claiming
teljesen Similarly
Street the would
for had
an
set and
the
trademark at
me project
spoke
more
of
with attention Mit
dishonour
mind but
is
asszonyban disposition Laun
astern kind
A vividly
his banished death
not he was
I family
California
better proceed a
by the mistake
lightened Proofreading he
in
to
sake from her
be
manner days
despatch a
of have time
England in
when
for
the mulva seventeen
jársz
Staminodes earth kis
of referred
a wake
more börtönbe
ending if
not still
were time
except to bring
which
it Astoria
waited
éppen it
follow What He
in finished
READ
young
wasteland
fun whether Shorty
despotism
a sem all
him lain here
and evening the
is in Project
on s
within such confirm
All the as
to hundred
this calmly
unpleasant and
the believe children
You his child
And almost
Mexican
to
his a
Poems
apt as
original
know
his
attempt vulgar
pools life
of did through
retired to
without
me the past
for children
Thus
since
of I wishes
cm have
American less nurse
taken would face
the other The
of 3
expect power will
construction wean cease
psychotic with
at We The
and bakák
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and
personal growth!
ebooknice.com