Chapter 3 Family Therapy
Chapter 3 Family Therapy
Chapter 3
understanding the symptom from the concept of unity implies understanding it within the
ecological framework of behaviors in which it is immersed. The symptom appears as a
need of the system, like in reality, any behavior of any member
familiar, not of the individuals.
Understanding the symptom from circular causality implies knowing how it chains together.
with all the other family behaviors.
By being understood as a result of the overall functioning of the system, the disorder passes
to be the product of an interaction and not the condition of an individual. It has been pointed out
two immediate effects in the clinical practice of this position: the first is the
excusing the one who has the symptom. The second is the neutrality that is gained
therapist, regarding the family when the problem that arose within it does not
conceived in terms of victim and victimizers.
Communication theory: its most conspicuous example is the double bind theory.
pathology comes from misinformation, from the lack of orientation and guidance. The
reasons why communication entanglements exist, imply the double bind
It has to do with the fear of losing children when they start to grow up.
regarding the conduct to which they are subjecting their victims, the same
consciousness is supposed to exist in the victims.
Levant, 1983
Process models: they are descriptive, deriving their evaluations from observation.
the interaction between family members. the symptom is considered as a part
from the interactional guideline. There are three procedural models:
The communicational: they seek repetitive sequences that provide an operational definition of
the rules of the family system.
The roles: describes the role configuration that family members play in
the interaction.
one of its members can be requested. As the PI maintains the dysfunctional pattern of the
family. the ecological context of the family (sources of support and stress) and its moment
evolutionary.
The model presents two problems: it views the family as static and does not account for the
relationships of the nuclear family with the extended one.
Historical models: they attempt to trace the development of family structure over time.
generations. Those guidelines are logically inferred. The symptoms are seen as part
of an interactional pattern and maintained by an organizational structure. Structure that
has been established through generations.
Hypothesis: hypotheses are formulations that the therapist and the team make about the
Family functioning. A hypothesis is an assumption and a starting point. It is a
assumption because it does not intend to be the truth about family functioning, if not
It's just a theoretical construction whose value depends on enabling a vision.
clear enough about what is happening in the family and of its ability to
guide the intervention.
There are a series of principles that are useful when questioning families:
Neutrality: it is said in relation to the family game. The therapist should not allow themselves
to consistently entangle oneself in the family game because it would lead to self-cancellation
as an agent of change. Neutrality is not an intrapsychic disposition of
therapist who tries not to get caught in the game, but rather the result of
a series of strategic moves executed throughout the entire interview, by virtue of
which the family can talk about how warm or not one is as a person.
Levels of neutrality:
Regarding people
Timeliness: defines the time interval during which a communication makes sense
within a territory N, a context X, and a relationship Y.
DULCE MARIA PEREZ SANTELIZ
FAMILY THERAPY COURSE
PROFESSOR: LUIS LEOPOLDO MORALES
Strategies: the therapist's work during the interview should also be oriented
to the definition of strategies. They are fundamentally related to short-term goals.
deadline (what the therapist aims to achieve) and long-term goals (what the
family and the therapist have set themselves as the purpose of the therapy.
Symptomatic behavior
2- Minimum change and final goal
3- Type of patient cooperation strategies that helped to solve the
problem.
4- Attempted solutions.
5- Symptomatic sequence
6- Family relationship maps
7- Family game
8- Moment of the family evolutionary cycle.
9- Sources of support and family stress.
Personal opinion
Elements that allow for an estimation of the problem. What is presented by the
patient understood as the diagnosis, aiming for a baseline and a
final goal of the treatment.
Recognizing the minimal change and final goal. Which are aimed at planning.
of the change, as well as establish a completion criterion.
Likewise, the type of cooperation of the patient and the family in therapy for
evaluate the change in the patient, also how to design the type of change depending
of the family in particular.
It is vital to recognize strategies that were useful and contribute to solving the problem.
which were effective for the patient and contributed to bringing about the change. Without
to underestimate the solutions attempted that the patient or the family has tried, to
resolve the problem that troubles them and has not worked for them, giving an opportunity to the
to what extent the family is receiving support and if it is being addressed apart
family doctor, social worker, etc.
Very useful in training is to know the usage rules to define the
problem, to understand how the family defines a problem, always preserving the
therapist the freedom to evaluate. Just like the evaluation (feedback) having as
Objective to evaluate the degree of compliance with the recommended task, in order to make recommendations.
new tasks. In evaluating the change, consider whether the change has been made,
very minimal it may seem, considering that a small change can give rise to
other changes in climbing or snowball.
Returning to the evaluation methodology, the questions in Family Therapy
Systemic ones are of great importance, as they contribute to having a greater amount of
information about the functioning of the family system, with different categories
such as linear, circular, strategic, reflective questions.