Treatment Protocol For Deep Bite
Treatment Protocol For Deep Bite
2017
Kelli MORO1
Bruna Lorena dos SANTOS2
SUMMARY
Overbite is a type of malocclusion that has a multifactorial etiology and requires
of a specific and elaborated differential diagnosis, which can be defined when the
the vertical overlap of the upper incisors over the lower incisors exceeds a
third of the crown of the lower incisors in centric occlusion. This malocclusion is
frequently found in patients in orthodontics. Its treatment is
extremely complex. The etiological factors can be skeletal and/or dental.
It does not show a prevalence between the female and male genders. Its treatment
it can be done by the intrusion of the anterior teeth, the extrusion of the posterior teeth, or
the combination of both techniques. In this article, we will see the various ways of
treatment and what is the most satisfactory approach for each case.
Overbite treatment protocol. Bite treatment
deep. orthodontic planning.
ABSTRACT
Overbite is a type of malocclusion that has a multifactorial etiology and requires a
differential diagnosis elaborate and specific and can be set when the overbite of the
the upper incisors of the lower incisors exceeds a third of the crown of the lower incisors in
Centric occlusion. This malocclusion is often found in patients in orthodontics.
treatment is extremely complex. The etiological factors may be skeletal and/or dental. It
does not present a prevalence among females and males. The treatment is done by the
intrusion of the anterior teeth, extrusion of posterior teeth or a combination of both.
In this article, we look at the various forms of treatment and what the most suitable approach is.
for each case
Deep overbite treatment protocol. Treatment of deep bite. Orthodontic
planning.
31
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
INTRODUCTION
According to Mota (2008), 'the etiology of this malocclusion has been studied and is related to
32
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
LITERATURE REVIEW
33
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, Jul./Dec. 2017
34
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
between the upper and lower incisors, which can be of skeletal origin or
dentoalveolar
According to Geron and Atalia (2005), in facial diagnosis we must take the smile into account.
gingival, some authors consider that, in the ideal smile, the upper lip should
position in a way to expose the entire crown of the upper central incisors up to 1 mm of
gum, up to 2 mm is considered acceptable. Above these values are considered
unaesthetic. These values are extremely important because in some cases where the
Gum exposure goes beyond these measures; some therapeutic measures are not included.
indicated.
Other factors such as pronounced Spee curve, change in the inter-incisal angle,
body size and mandibular branch are associated with this type of malocclusion
(NUNEZ, 2009).
Therapeutic strategies should be related to the etiology of the overbite.
presented, thus addressing the primary cause of the problem. The therapeutic options
available would then be: intrusion of anterior teeth, extrusion of posterior teeth,
the leveling of the Spee curve, associated with the rotation of the mandible in the sense
measured and the ideal), evolution (patient's age), skeletal etiology (long face,
short), and dental etiology (supra-eruption of the incisors). Three are the most common methods
common for correcting the overbite: extrusion of the posterior teeth inclination
of the anterior teeth and intrusion of the upper and lower incisors (ALMEIDA, 2010).
The cause of deep overbite may be related to both tooth loss.
posterior, mandibular retrusion, wear of posterior teeth, length of
upper and lower incisors, cusp height and vertical growth of the mandible,
such as the height of the mandibular branch and facial pattern (SILVA, 2014).
The possibility of posterior tooth extrusion is old, Hemley (1938) described the
treatment of some patients where a plate with an anterior stop was used to
to enable the extrusion of posterior teeth.
After gathering observations from various researchers and clinicians, Silva and Capelli Junior
35
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
(1990) concluded that the most commonly used device in the correction of
exaggerated overbite is the bite plate. Its main effects are intrusion.
two lower incisors; extrusion of the posterior teeth; growth of the alveolar bone
in the posterior region in the vertical direction; increase of the lower third of the face.
There are several mechanical resources to stimulate the extrusion of posterior teeth.
Didactically, these could be divided into active and passive resources. The
the first would be those that would generate forces directly on the back teeth, such as
the cervical extraoral appliance, the use of intermaxillary elastics and the use of mechanics
extrusive in fixed appliances. The latter, called passive, would be the plate with
the spacer and the functional appliances that promote posterior disocclusion (BENNETT;
MCLAUGHILIN, 1990).
Moyers (1991) stated that the extrusion of the first molars can be assisted by
use of a maxillary bite plan or a monoblock, which also promotes a
intrusion of the lower incisors.
The extrusion of posterior teeth has a direct impact on the amount of overlap.
vertical in the anterior region. For each 1mm of posterior extrusion, the vertical overlap
anterior reduced by 2mm (PROFFIT, 1995).
For the treatment of deep overbite in the deciduous and mixed dentition, Janson
et al. (1998) suggest the Eruption Guide device, which consists of a combination of
functional devices with dental positioning brackets. The thickness of the plastic material
keeps the posterior teeth disoccluded, allowing for their greater development
vertical, while allowing the application of intrusive forces on the teeth
previously, when the patient occludes forcefully on the appliance.
According to Nanda and Kuhlberg (2007), the most common in orthodontic practice is the use of
36
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, Jul./Dec. 2017
For the realization of anterior teeth intrusion, there are basically two types of
mechanics: the continuous intrusion arch and the 3-piece arch. In the first, the segment
of the arch that will promote the intrusion surrounds the entire dental arch and, in the anterior region,
it can be attached to the teeth by fitting directly into the slots of the brackets or
being tied to another previous segment. In the second system, called an arc
From 3 pieces, two segments of intrusion straps are made (one for each)
side) and fitted into another segment in the anterior region (BURSTONE, 2001).
The orthodontic procedure with segmented arches offers a beneficial alternative.
for the intrusion of anterior teeth, compared to the technique of the straight arch, which can
to produce a greater inclination of the incisors, as well as the instability of the results
(BURSTONE, 2001).
According to Burstone (2001), the key to success in intrusion is system control.
of forces used. Specifically, light and constant forces should be used, and
37
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
the point of application and the direction of the force must be carefully assessed.
a force magnitude of 10 to 15g per incisor should be used, and to calculate the total
to strength, one must add the teeth that one wishes to intrude and apply the load
correspondent. Due to the importance of the magnitude of force for obtaining good
clinical results, it is suggested to use precision dynamometers to calculate the load
adequate.
The intrusion of incisors was considered, for many years, a complex movement.
it is difficult to be carried out. Furthermore, it has already been associated, several times, with reabsorptions
root and gum recessions. This occurs due to the intrusion movement generating
a pressure on the root apex, as well as when they are accompanied by
vestibularization, as the teeth move to an area of less support
bone (CHIQUETO et al., 2005).
In fact, regardless of the risks, when the intrusion movement is
carried out in a controlled and precise manner, little or no damage will be caused to your
dental structure or its periodontal supporting structure. In a systematic review
published by, it was concluded that the intrusion movement is viable and easier.
to be reached in the lower arc. According to the meta-analysis conducted, commonly, the
The selection technique for the intrusion of incisors is segmented and about 1.5mm of
upper incisors intrusion and 1.9mm of lower incisors are achieved (KUHLBERG,
2007).
The intrusion of upper incisors as a unique resource for bite correction
deep has been little used, as exposing upper teeth, as well as exposing a
small strip of gum tissue, it is aesthetic and rejuvenates patients. On the other hand,
In some selected clinical situations, the intrusion of upper incisors is acceptable.
indicated (BRITO, 2009).
Varlik, Alkapan and Turkoz (2014) investigated the long-term stability of the correction.
of overbite with intrusion of lower incisors with utility arches in patients
adults. The null hypothesis was that the correction of the overbite with the intrusion of the incisors
38
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
so that there is stability (BALL et al., 1991; NANDA et al., 2007; NANDA 1981).
Combinations of mechanics
In some situations, the clinical and skeletal characteristics of the patients indicate
the correction of deep bite through the association of posterior dental extrusion
to the previous intrusion and/or correction of axial inclination. In these cases, the control
Biomechanics is not critical, and the use of simpler force systems is viable.
(BRITO, 2009).
39
2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, jul./dec. 2017
DISCUSSION
The consulted literature on deep overbite is consistent with Marini Filho.
(1996), Moyers (1991) and Diamond (1944), when stating that the etiology of this malocclusion
it is the set of genetic, epigenetic, and local environmental factors that interact,
causing a counterclockwise rotation of the jaw.
For Diamond (1944) and Silva et al. (1990). The problem of overbite generates
serious consequences for the stomatognathic system as a whole.
Regarding the classification of deep overbites, Baume (1950) classified
dentally the overbite in slight, moderate, and exaggerated based on the point of
occlusion between the incisal of the lower incisors and the lingual surface of the upper incisors.
Marini Filho (1996) classified deep bites into dento-alveolar and
skeletal, based on the origin of malocclusion by an adaptation at the moment of
eruption of teeth, or due to skeletal changes respectively, where the
adaptations of tooth eruption can worsen a skeletal overbite.
A dental crossbite is normal when 20% of the lower incisor is overlapped by the upper one.
superior in Neff's view (1949). But each author cites a value that he defines as value.
normal, being: 1/3 of the crown of the incisors (RICHMOND, 1992,); 2/3 of the crown of
incisors (GRAINGER, 1967); 20% of the crown of the incisors (NEFF, 1949); 25-40% of the
crown of the incisors (NANDA, 1981); and 4mm or 50% of the crown of the incisors (OKESON,
1993).
According to Silva (1990), there is no statistically significant difference.
regarding the incidence of overbite in the male and female genders.
However, the overbite can be found in Angle Classes I and II, being
found in its most typical form in Class II second division.
Several factors are related to the development of excessive overbite.
Among them, we can highlight the supra occlusion of the anterior teeth, the infra occlusion.
of the back teeth and the combination of these two alternatives (SILVA; CAPELLI)
JÚNIOR, 1990; STRANG, 1950), the anterior rotation of the mandible (MARINI FILHO,
1996), the shortening of the mandibular branch (MOYERS, 1991;) and, more rarely, the
excessive lingual inclination of the lower molars (SILVA; CAPELLI JÚNIOR, 1990). A
Correction of excessive overbite includes at least one of the following mechanisms:
intrusion of incisors, extrusion of molars, inclination of incisors to labia,
labialization of lower incisors, and combinations of mechanics (BURSTONE,
1977; MOYERS, 1991; NANDA et al.; 2007, 1991; PROFITT, 1991; SILVA; CAPELLI
40
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, Jul./Dec. 2017
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
The prognosis of post-treatment for overbite is never satisfactory, due to
recurrence problem, which usually occurs 1 to 5 years after the active phase of
treatment. The intrusion of the upper and/or lower incisors is the form of correction
which provides greater stability post-treatment. Patients with facial pattern
vertical show a lower recurrence rate and greater stability of post-results
treatment. The recurrence of deep overbite is directly proportional to
amount of correction made.
Literature is unanimous in stating that the success of correcting deep overbite,
it can be compromised by post-treatment recurrence, regardless of the methods
the techniques used.
REFERENCES
41
ISSN 2179-9660 RFAIPE, v. 7, n. 2, p. 31-42, Jul./Dec. 2017
42