Brandon and Gregory Case Motion
Brandon and Gregory Case Motion
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI §
§
vs Cause No. 2022-159-LS §
§
BRANDON GREGORY CASE AND §
GREGORY CHARLES CASE §
Defendant §
MOTION TO DISMISS
Comes Defendant, Gregory Case, by and through his attorney, and files this his Motion to
1. Defendant, and his son, Brandon Case were indicted on November 15, 2022.
3. At the trial, it was determined that certain discovery had not been provided to the
Defendant before trial, and the Court, on Motion of Defendants, Gregory Case and Brandon
4. The mistrial declared on August 17, 2023 was clearly the fault of Detective/Investigator
5. He admitted on the witness stand that he had failed to provide certain information to the
defense.
6. Sometime after the mistrial, on the November 17, 2023, the State provided its 3rd
7. Later the State provided even more information that was not initially provided.
8. The State's non-disclosure is in violation of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and the case
law. State v. King 656, So. 2d 1168 (Miss. 1995) stands for the authority that an investigator is a
9. Bridgemon v. State 58 So. 3d 1208 (Miss. Appeal 2010) states a "Brady violation" can
Page 1 of 3
Case: 43CI1:22cr00159 Document #: 140 Filed: 03/07/2024 Page 2 of 3
10. Delay in this case is solely the fault of the State and has caused delay and harm to both
Defendants.
WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Court should dismiss the indictment as filed
against by Defendants in this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
BY:
BY:
@srml�s
Page 2 of 3
Case: 43CI1:22cr00159 Document #: 140 Filed: 03/07/2024 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, attorney of record for the Defendant, Gregory Case, do hereby certify
that I have this day served, by United States Mail, postage prepaid, and/or electronic transmission
a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendant's Motion for Reduction of Bond to the
following:
This the
�
Y of --�--J
_____�, 2024.
Page 3 of 3