0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views139 pages

Administration Protection of Rights Versus Preservation of Autonomy 43672300

Scholarly document: (Ebook) Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration : Protection of Rights versus Preservation of Autonomy by Paola Chirulli, Luca De Lucia ISBN 9780429595691, 9780367682972, 9780367182380, 9780429060243, 0429595697, 0367682974, 0367182386, 0429060246 Instant availability. Combines theoretical knowledge and applied understanding in a well-organized educational format.

Uploaded by

hanulkahu5404
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views139 pages

Administration Protection of Rights Versus Preservation of Autonomy 43672300

Scholarly document: (Ebook) Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration : Protection of Rights versus Preservation of Autonomy by Paola Chirulli, Luca De Lucia ISBN 9780429595691, 9780367682972, 9780367182380, 9780429060243, 0429595697, 0367682974, 0367182386, 0429060246 Instant availability. Combines theoretical knowledge and applied understanding in a well-organized educational format.

Uploaded by

hanulkahu5404
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 139

(Ebook) Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration

: Protection of Rights versus Preservation of


Autonomy by Paola Chirulli, Luca De Lucia ISBN
9780429595691, 9780367682972, 9780367182380,
9780429060243, 0429595697, 0367682974, 0367182386,
0429060246 online version
Get your copy at ebooknice.com
( 4.6/5.0 ★ | 148 downloads )

https://ebooknice.com/product/non-judicial-remedies-and-eu-
administration-protection-of-rights-versus-preservation-of-
autonomy-43672300
(Ebook) Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration :
Protection of Rights versus Preservation of Autonomy by
Paola Chirulli, Luca De Lucia ISBN 9780429595691,
9780367682972, 9780367182380, 9780429060243, 0429595697,
0367682974, 0367182386, 0429060246 Pdf Download

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME

INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY


Here are some recommended products that we believe you will be
interested in. You can click the link to download.

(Ebook) Biota Grow 2C gather 2C cook by Loucas, Jason; Viles, James


ISBN 9781459699816, 9781743365571, 9781925268492, 1459699815,
1743365578, 1925268497

https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374

(Ebook) Matematik 5000+ Kurs 2c Lärobok by Lena Alfredsson, Hans


Heikne, Sanna Bodemyr ISBN 9789127456600, 9127456609

https://ebooknice.com/product/matematik-5000-kurs-2c-larobok-23848312

(Ebook) SAT II Success MATH 1C and 2C 2002 (Peterson's SAT II Success)


by Peterson's ISBN 9780768906677, 0768906679

https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-
math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-s-sat-ii-success-1722018

(Ebook) Master SAT II Math 1c and 2c 4th ed (Arco Master the SAT
Subject Test: Math Levels 1 & 2) by Arco ISBN 9780768923049,
0768923042

https://ebooknice.com/product/master-sat-ii-math-1c-and-2c-4th-ed-
arco-master-the-sat-subject-test-math-levels-1-2-2326094
(Ebook) Cambridge IGCSE and O Level History Workbook 2C - Depth Study:
the United States, 1919-41 2nd Edition by Benjamin Harrison ISBN
9781398375147, 9781398375048, 1398375144, 1398375047

https://ebooknice.com/product/cambridge-igcse-and-o-level-history-
workbook-2c-depth-study-the-united-states-1919-41-2nd-edition-53538044

(Ebook) Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet : A


Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism? by Oreste Pollicino ISBN
9781509912704, 9781509912711, 9781849468053, 1509912703, 1509912711,
1849468052
https://ebooknice.com/product/judicial-protection-of-fundamental-
rights-on-the-internet-a-road-towards-digital-
constitutionalism-46486230

(Ebook) Relative Authority of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review : EU


Courts, Boards of Appeal, Ombudsman by Michal Krajewski ISBN
9781509947300, 9781509947317, 9781509947294, 9781509947324,
1509947302, 1509947310, 1509947299, 1509947329
https://ebooknice.com/product/relative-authority-of-judicial-and-
extra-judicial-review-eu-courts-boards-of-appeal-ombudsman-46505644

(Ebook) Eu Corporate Law And Eu Company Tax Law by Luca Cerioni ISBN
9781845427740, 1845427742

https://ebooknice.com/product/eu-corporate-law-and-eu-company-tax-
law-1370964

(Ebook) Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection:


Rethinking Relations Between the Echr, Eu, and National Legal Orders
by Oddny Mjoll Arnardottir; Antoine Buyse ISBN 9781138121249,
113812124X
https://ebooknice.com/product/shifting-centres-of-gravity-in-human-
rights-protection-rethinking-relations-between-the-echr-eu-and-
national-legal-orders-10415680
Non-Judicial Remedies and EU
Administration

The increasing number of executive tasks assigned to EU institutions and agencies


has resulted in a greater demand for justice that can no longer be satisfied by the
courts alone. This has led to the development of a wide range of administrative
remedies that have become a central part of the EU administrative justice system.
This book examines the important theoretical and practical issues raised by this
phenomenon.
The work focuses on five administrative remedies: internal review; administrative
appeals to the Commission against decisions of executive and decentralised
agencies; independent administrative review of decisions of decentralised agencies;
complaints to the EU Ombudsman; and complaints to the EU Data Protection
Supervisor. The research rests on the idea that there is a complex, and at times
ambivalent, relationship between administrative remedies and the varying
degrees of autonomy of EU institutions and bodies, offices and agencies. The
work draws on legislation, internal rules of executive bodies, administrative
practices and specific case law, data and statistics. This empirical approach helps to
unveil the true dynamics present within these procedures and demonstrates that
whilst administrative remedies may improve the relationship between individuals
and the EU administration, their interplay with administrative autonomy might
lead to a risk of fragmentation and incoherence in the EU administrative justice
system.

Paola Chirulli is Professor of Italian and European administrative law at the


University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’.

Luca De Lucia is Professor of Italian and European administrative law at the


University of Salerno.
Non-Judicial Remedies and
EU Administration
Protection of Rights versus Preservation
of Autonomy

Paola Chirulli and Luca De Lucia


First published 2021
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2021 Paola Chirulli and Luca De Lucia
The right of Paola Chirulli and Luca De Lucia to be identified as
authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with
sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or
reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical,
or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval
system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks
or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Chirulli, Paola, author. | De Lucia, Luca, author.
Title: Non-judicial remedies and EU administration : protection of rights
versus preservation of autonomy / Paola Chirulli and Luca de Lucia.
Other titles: Non-judicial remedies and European Union administration
Description: Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. |
Series: Routledge-giappichelli studies in law | Includes bibliographical
references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2020035528 (print) | LCCN 2020035529 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780367182380 (hardback) | ISBN 9780429060243 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Administrative remedies—European Union countries. |
Administrative procedure—European Union countries. | European Ombudsman. |
Judicial review of administrative acts—European Union countries.
Classification: LCC KJE5607 .C45 2021 (print) | LCC KJE5607
(ebook) | DDC 347.24/077—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020035528
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020035529
ISBN: 978-0-367-18238-0 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-0-429-06024-3 (ebk)
Giappichelli ISBN: 9788892135895
Typeset in Galliard
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
This book is based on research funded by the University of Rome
‘La Sapienza’, Department of Economics and Law and the University
of Salerno, Department of Political Science and Communication.
Contents

Table of casesix
Table of legislationxv
Table of abbreviationsxxii

Introduction 1
1 Reasons behind the research 1
2 Types of remedies 2
3 Methodology and research goals 5
4 Structure of the book 8

I Administrative remedies and the autonomy of


EU administrations 9
1 Administrative remedies and the direct execution
of EU law 9
2 The autonomy of EU administrations: a brief outline 12
2.1 Legislation, accountability and bureaucracy 13
2.2 The role of the EU judiciary 17
3 The autonomy of EU administrations and disputes
with private parties 18
4 Administrative remedies and models of administration 20
4.1 ‘Implementation’ and ‘adjudication’ 21
4.2 Completion of the conceptual framework 24
5 Classification of administrative remedies vis-à-vis EU
administrations 25
6 Clarifications on the investigation criteria 29
7 The autonomy of EU administrations and administrative
remedies 30

II Internal review 34
1 Introduction 34
2 Rules and practices 36
vi Contents
2.1 Proceedings of general application 36
2.2 Proceedings of specific application: examples 38
2.3 Internal review of technical and scientific assessments: examples 43
2.4 Internal review under the Aarhus Regulation 45
2.5 Special cases 48
3 Convergences: structural and functional profiles 51
4 Internal review and the Lisbon Treaty 55
4.1 Article 298 TFEU and Article 41(2) CFR: effectiveness
and efficacy of internal review 55
4.2 Article 47 CFR: right of access to justice and internal
review 59
5 An alternative model for internal review: the functions of
Hearing Officers in EU competition law 65
6 Internal review and the autonomy of EU administrations 67

III Appeals to the Commission against decisions of EU agencies 72


1 Introduction 72
2 Rules and practices 74
2.1 Decentralised agencies 74
2.2 Executive agencies 78
3 Origins and distinctive features of the appeal to the
Commission 81
3.1 Development of the institutional context 81
3.2 Features of the remedy 84
4 Article 263(5) TFEU and administrative remedies against
the acts of agencies 88
4.1 Origin and meaning 88
4.2 A judicial interpretation 90
4.3 Clarifications 92
5 Current state of the appeal to the Commission 94
5.1 Decentralised agencies 94
5.2 Executive agencies 98
6 The appeal to the Commission and the autonomy of EU
agencies 100

IV Administrative review before the EU agencies’ Boards of Appeal 103


1 Boards of Appeal: types and constitutional basis 103
2 Distinctive features of EU Boards of Appeal 107
3 The quasi-judicial nature of Boards of Appeal 112
4 Proceedings before Boards of Appeal 115
4.1 Standing and entitled parties 116
Contents vii
4.2 Terms, conditions and procedures for lodging appeals;
decisions subject to appeal 118
4.3 Effects of the appeal 122
4.4 Appeal proceedings 124
5 Scope and intensity of the review before EU agencies’ Boards of
Appeal 128
5.1 The notice of appeal and the decision-making powers of
Boards of Appeal 130
5.2 Questions of law and fact 133
5.3 Review of technical issues and substitutive powers: between
adjudication and implementation 136
6 Boards of Appeal, protection of private interests and autonomy
of agencies 146

V Complaints to the European Ombudsman 157


1 Constitutional basis and distinctive features 157
2 The complaint 164
2.1 Admissibility requirements 164
2.2 Content and issues that can be raised 169
3 The Ombudsman’s scope and investigative powers 172
4 Quality and intensity of review: beyond legality 173
5 Type and effects of decisions: adjudication, implementation
and regulation 178
6 The Ombudsman’s powers and the autonomy of European
administrations 185

VI Administrative remedies and personal data processing 190


1 Introduction 190
2 Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor 193
2.1 The complaint procedure 193
2.2 Functional and factual aspects 196
2.3 Complaints to the EDPS and administrative
autonomy 200
3 Administrative protection vis-à-vis Europol personal data
processing 202
3.1 The Europol Decision and appeals to the Joint Supervisory
Body 203
3.2 The Europol Regulation and complaints to the EDPS 207
4 The evolution of Eurojust within the EU data protection
system 209
viii Contents
4.1 Appeals before the Joint Supervisory Body. Regulation,
cases and problems 213
4.2 The 2018 Eurojust Regulation and prospects for personal
data protection 216
5 Conclusions 219

VII Accountability, transformative tensions and the need for


constitutionalisation 221
1 Introduction 221
2 Administrative remedies and the accountability of EU
administrations 222
2.1 Administrative remedies and the emergence of disputes in
EU law 222
2.2 Political direction and control 224
2.3 Bureaucratic control 227
3 Administrative remedies and EU courts 230
3.1 Administrative remedies and access to judicial
review 232
3.2 Administrative and judicial protection, between
‘separation’ and ‘contamination’ 238
3.3 The influence of EU courts on the administrations’
autonomy in resolving conflicts with private parties 244
4 Tensions and possible developments 249
4.1 Internal review and the influence of New Public
Management 249
4.2 The Boards of Appeal within EU agencies 252
4.3 Administrative remedies provided for in the Treaty 256
5 Administrative remedies and the uncertainty regarding the
rights of private parties 258
6 Towards the constitutionalisation of administrative
remedies 260
6.1 The problem 260
6.2 A possible role for the legislature 261
6.3 The role of the CJEU and legal scholarship 264

Index267
Cases

Court of Justice
case 9/56 Meroni v High Authority EU:C:1958:7
case 10/56 Meroni v High Authority EU:C:1958:8
case 58/75 Sergy v Commission EU:C:1976:102
case 33/79 Kuhner v Commission EU:C:1980:139
case 101/79 Vecchioli v Commission EU:C:1980:243
case 34/80 Authié v Commission EU:C:1981:57
case 98/80 Romano EU:C:1981:104
case 294/83 Parti écologiste ‘Les Verts’ v European Parliament EU:C:1986:166
case 133/88 Del Amo Martinez v Parliament EU:C:1989:124
joined cases 41 and 178/88 Becker and Starquit v European Parliament
EU:C:1989:369
C-404/92 P X v Commission EU:C:1994:361
C-234/02 P European Ombudsman v Frank Lamberts EU:C:2004:174
C-106/03 P Vedial SA v OHIM EU:C:2004:611
C-123/03 P Commission v Greencore Group plc EU:C:2004:783
C-160/03 Kingdom of Spain v Eurojust EU:C:2005:168
C-29/05 P OHIM v Kaul EU:C:2007:162
C-167/06 P Komninou v Commission EU:C:2007:633
C-362/08 P Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission EU:C:2010:40
C-580/08 P Srinivasan v EU Ombudsman EU:C:2009:402
C-38/09 P CPVO v Schräder EU:C:2013:679
C-362/09 P Athinaïki Techniki AE v Commission EU:C:2010:492, Opinion
of AG Bot
C-263/09 P Edwin v OHIM EU:C:2011:452
C-534/10 P Brookfield and Elaris v CPVO EU:C:2012:813
C-53/11 P OHIM v Nike International EU:C:2012:27
C-610/11 P Centrotherm Systemtechnik v OHIM EU:C:2013:593
C-621/11 P New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHIM EU:C:2013:484
C-625/11 P PPG and SNF v ECHA EU:C:2013:594
C-270/12 United Kingdom v European Parliament EU:C:2014:18
x Cases
C-404 and 405/12 P Council of the European Union and Commission v Sticht-
ing Natuur and Others EU:C:2015:5
C-530/12 P OHIM v National Lottery Commission EU:C:2013:782, Opin-
ion of AG Bot
C-546/12 P Ralf Schräder v CPVO EU:C:2015:332, Opinion of AG
Sharpston EU:C:2014:2373
C-261/13 P Schönberger v European Parliament EU:C:2014:2423
C-290/13 P Rütgers v ECHA EU:C:2014:2174
C-43/15 P BSH v EUIPO EU:C:2016:837
C-61/15 P Heliflight GmbH v EASA EU:C:2016:59
C-226/15 P Apple and Pear Austria and Star Fruits Diffusion v EUIPO
EU:C:2016:582; Opinion of AG Bobek EU:C:2016:250
C-337/15 P European Ombudsman v Staelen EU:C:2017:253
C-577/15 P Capital OÜ v EBA EU:C:2016:947
C-625/15 P Schniga v CPVO EU:C:2017:435
C-73/16 Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Krim-
inálny úrad finančnej správy EU:C:2017:725; Opinion of AG Kokott
EU:C:2017:253
C-326/16 P LL v European Parliament EU:C:2018:83; Opinion of AG
Szpunar EU:C:2017:605
C-379/16 P European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others v EUIPO
EU:C:2016:905
C-82/17 P TestBioTech eV and Others v Commission EU:C:2019:719; Opin-
ion of AG Szpunar EU:C:2018:837
C-450/17 P Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg v ECB EU:C:2019:372
C-576/17 P(R)-R Wall Street Systems UK Ltd v ECB EU:C:2017:735
C-702/18 P ‘Primart’ v EUIPO EU:C:2019:1030, Opinion of AG Bobek
C-794/18 P Pracsis SPRL and Conceptexpo Project v EACEA EU:C:2019:305
C-71/19 P Barata v European Parliament EU:C:2019:793
C-444/19 P Kiku v CPVO EU:C:2019:746
C-577/19 P KID-Systeme GmbH v EUIPO EU:C:2019:854
C-614/19 P Porsche v EUIPO EU:C:2019:904
C-586/19 P L’Oréal v EUIPO EU:C:2019:845

General Court/Court of First Instance


T-121/89 and 13/90 X v Commission EU:T:1992:96
T-10/93 A v Commission EU:T:1994:39
T-148/97 Keeling v OHIM EU:T:1998:114
T-300/97 Latino v Commission EU:T:1999:328
T-163/98 Procter & Gamble v OHIM EU:T:1999:145
T-186/98 Inpesca v Commission EU:T:2001:42
T-5/99 Andriotis v Commission and Cedefop EU:T:2000:37
T-122/99 Procter & Gamble v OHIM EU:T:2000:39
T-189/99 Gerochristos v Commission EU:T:2001:12
Cases xi
T-65/00 Ioannou v Council EU:T:2001:14
T-74, 76, 83, 84, 85, 132, 137 and 141/00 Artegodan v Commission EU:T:
2002:283
T-209/00 Lamberts v European Ombudsman EU:T:2002:94
T-47/01 Co-Frutta Soc. coop. v Commission EU:T:2003:272
T-63/01 Procter & Gamble v OHIM EU:T:2002:317
T-219/01 Commerzbank AG v Commission EU:T:2003:201
T-308/01 Henkel v OHIM EU:T:2003:241
T‑273/02 Krüger v OHIM EU:T:2005:134
T-308/02 SGL Carbon AG v Commission EU:T:2004:119
T-49/03 Schumann v Commission EU:T:2004:314
T-57/03 SPAG v OHIM EU:T:2005:29
T-110/03 Sison v Council EU:T:2005:143
T-112/03 L’Oréal v OHMI – Revlon EU:T:2005:102
T-133/03 Schering-Plough Ltd v Commission and EMEA EU:T:2007:365
T-198/03 Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG v Commission EU:T:2006:136
T-191/04 MIP Metro v OHMI – Tesco Stores EU:T:2006:254
T-252/04 Caviar Anzali v OHIM EU:T:2006:199
T-355 and 446/04 Co-Frutta Soc. coop. v Commission EU:T:2010:15
T-380/04 Terezakis v Commission EU:T:2008:19
T-474/04 Pergan Hilfsstoffe v Commission EU:T:2007:306
T-237/05 Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v Commission EU:T:2010:224
T-165/06 Fiorucci v OHMI – Edwin EU:T:2009:157
T-171/06 Laytoncrest v OHMI – Erico (TRENTON) EU:T:2009:70
T-187/06 Ralf Schräder v CPVO EU:T:2013:522
T-411/06 Sogelma v AER EU:T:2008:419
T-211/07 Awww v Eurofound EU:T:2011:415
T-234/07 Grolsch v Commission EU:T:2011:476
T-407/07 CMB Maschinenbau v Commission EU:T:2011:477
T-133 and 134/08 Ralf Schräder v CPVO EU:T:2012:430
T-135/08 Schniga v CPVO EU:T:2010:397
T-176/08 Infeurope v Commission EU:T:2009:264
T-188/08 Infeurope v Commission EU:T:2009:265
T-196/08 Srinivasan v European Ombudsman EU:T:2008:470
T-292/08 Inditex v OHIM EU:T:2020:399
T-338/08 Stichting Natuur v Commission EU:T:2012:300
T-377/08 P Commission v Birkhoff EU:T:2009:485
T-457/08 R Intel Corp. v Commission EU:T:2009:18
T-164/09 Kitou v EDPS EU:T:2010:533
T-284/09 P H. Meister v OHIM T:2010:246
T-359/09 Jurašinović v Council EU:T:2010:241
T-396/09 Vereniging Milieudefensie v Commission EU:T:2012:301
T-415/09 New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHMI – Vallis K. – Vallis A. EU:T:2011:550
T-468/09 JSK International Architekten et al. v ECB EU:T:2012:639
T-96/10 Rütgers v ECHA EU:T:2013:109
xii Cases
T-268/10 Polyelectrolyte Producers Group v ECHA EU:T:2015:698
T-277/10 K v Eurojust EU:T:2010:485
T-278/10 Wesergold Getränkeindustrie v OHIM – Lidl Stiftung EU:T:2012:459
T-217/11 Staelen v European Ombudsman EU:T:2015:238
T-299/11 European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO EU:T:
2015:757
T-345/11 ENISA v EDPS EU:T:2011:700
T-476/11 P Moschonaki v Commission EU:T:2013:557
T-553/11 European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB EU:T:2014:275
T-556/11 European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO
EU:T:2013:514
T-577/11 Ethniko kai Kapodistriako Panepistimio Athinon v European Centre
for Disease Prevention and Control EU:T:2013:229
T-608/11 Beifa Group v OHIM – Schwan-Stabilo Schwanhäußer EU:T:2013:334
T-132/12 Scooters India v OHIM EU:T:2014:843
T-192/12 PAN Europe v Commission EU:T:2014:152
T-235/12 CEDC International v OHMI – Underberg EU:T:2014:1058
T-283/12 FIS’D – Formazione integrata superiore del design v Commission
EU:T:2014:933
T-347/12 P Mocová v Commission EU:T:2014:268
T-537/12 Zafeiropoulos v CEDEFOP EU:T:2016:36
T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM EU:T:2015:281
T-89/13 Calestep v ECHA EU:T:2015:711
T-102/13 Heliflight GmbH v EASA EU:T:2014:1064
T-177/13 TestBioTech and Others v Commission EU:T:2016:736
T-201/13 Rubinum v Commission EU:T:2015:311
T-343/13 CN v European Parliament EU:T:2015:926
T-405/13 Le Comptoir d’Épicure v OHIM T:2014:1072
T-609/13 Blackrock v OHIM EU:T:2015:54
T-620/13 Marchi Industriale v ECHA EU:T:2016:479
T-673/13 European Coalition to End Animal Experiments v ECHA EU:T:
2015:167
T-695/13 Enac v Commission and INEA EU:T:2014:924
T-424/14 ClientEarth v Commission EU:T:2015:848
T-587/14 Crosfield v ECHA EU:T:2016:475
T-652/14 AF Steelcase, SA v EUIPO EU:T:2016:370
T-660/14 SV Capital OÜ v EBA EU:T:2015:608
T-724/14 European Children’s Fashion Association and Others v EACEA
EU:T:2015:550
T-787/14 P ECB v Cerafogli EU:T:2016:633
T-791/14 Bensarsa v Commission and EDPS EU:T:2015:267
T-816/14 Tayto Group v OHIM, EU:T:2016:93
T-104/15 Symvouleftiki v Commission EU:T:2018:360
T-122/15 Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg v ECB EU:T:2017:337
T-140/15 Aurora srl v CPVO EU:2017:380
T-286/15 KF v SatCen EU:T:2018:718
Cases xiii
T-411/15 PP Gappol Marzena Porczinska v EUIPO EU:T:2017:689
T-564/15 Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV v Commission EU:T:2016:611
T-603/15 Frank v Commission EU:T:2017:228
T-604/15 Ertico – ITS Europe v Commission EU:T:2019:348
T-712/15 Crédit mutuel Arkéa v ECB EU:T:2017:900
T-36/16 Enercon GmbH v EUIPO EU:T:2017:295
T-140/16 Jean-Marie Le Pen v European Parliament EU:T:2016:645
T-237/16 NI v EDPS EU:T:2016:542
T-247/16 Trasta Komercbanka AS v ECB EU:T:2017:623
T-478/16 Frank v Commission EU:T:2019:399
T-581/16 Popotas v European Ombudsman EU:T:2018:169
T-803/16 Glaxo Group Ltd v EUIPO EU:T:2018:330
T-817/16 Vans v EUIPO EU:T:2018:880
T-125/17 BASF Grenzach v ECHA EU:T:2019:638
T-452/17 TL v EDPS EU:T:2018:418
T-463/17 Raise Conseil v EUIPO EU:T:2018:249
T-579/17 Wall Street Systems UK Ltd v ECB EU:T:2017:668
T-717/17 Chioreanu v ERCEA EU:T:2018:765
T-755/17 Federal Republic of Germany v ECHA EU:T:2019:647
T-765/17 Kiku GmbH v CPVO EU:T:2019:244
T-33/18 Pracsis SPRL and Conceptexpo Project v EACEA EU:T:2018:656
T-112/18 Pink Lady America LLC v CPVO EU:T:2019:679
T-233/18 Anastasia-Soultana Gaki v EDPS EU:T:2018:629
T-676/18 Silvain Rimlinger v European Ombudsman EU:T:2019:125

European Union Civil Service Tribunal


F-95/05 N v Commission EU:F:2007:226
F-2/07 Martins v Commission EU:F:2010:22
F-45/07 Mandt v European Parliament EU:F:2010:72
F-33/08 V v Commission EU:F:2009:141
F-77/08 I.V. Carbajosa and Others v Commission EU:F:2010:133
F-46/09 V v European Parliament EU:F:2011:101
F-26/10 AZ v Commission EU:F:2011:163
F-66/11 Alma Yael v Commission F:2012:88
F-103/11 CG v European Investment Bank EU:F:2014:185
F-26/12 Cerafogli v ECB EU:F:2014:218
F-128/12 CR v European Parliament EU:F:2014:38
F-107/13 de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission EU:F:2014:232
F-142/14 De Almeida Pereira v Eurojust EU:F:2015:83

European Court of Human Rights


case No 6232/73 König v Germany ECHR:1980:0310JUD000623273
case No 6878/75 Le Compte and Others v Belgium ECHR:1981:0623JUD
000687875
xiv Cases
case No 13616/88 Hentrich v France ECHR:1994:0922JUD001361688
case No 23959/94 Janssen v Germany ECHR:2001:1220JUD002395994
case No 41959/08 Anastasakis v Greece ECHR:2011:1206JUD004195908
case No 53339/09 Siermiński v Poland ECHR:2014:1202JUD005333909

United Kingdom Supreme Court


R (Bradley) v Secretary of State and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 36, [2009]
QB 114
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, [2012] 1 AC 663
JR55 [2016] UKSC 22
Legislation

Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union [2016] OJ C 202/13


(TEU)
Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
[2016] OJ C 202/447 (TFEU)
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2016] OJ C 202/389
(CFR)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation No 31 (EEC) and No 11 (EAEC) lay-
ing down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employ-
ment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and
the European Atomic Energy Community [1962] OJ P 45/1385 (Staff
Regulations)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of the Council of
10 February 1975 establishing a European Centre for the Development of
Vocational Training [1975] OJ L 39/1 (CEDEFOP Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of
26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the improve-
ment of living and working conditions [1975] OJ L 139/1 (EUROFOND
Regulation)
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Commu-
nity trade mark [1994] OJ L 11/1, art 118 (OHIM Regulation)
Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9
March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the per-
formance of the Ombudsman’s duties [1994] OJ L 113/15
Consolidated Version of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18
July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
[1994] OJ L 216/1 (EU-OSHA Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27
July 1994 on Community plant variety rights [1994] OJ L 227/1 (CPVO
Regulation)
Council Act of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention based on Article
K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European
Police Office [1995] OJ C 316/1 (Europol Convention)
xvi Legislation
Consolidated Version of Rules of Procedure of the Commission [2000] OJ L
308/26
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the
processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and
on the free movement of such data [2001] OJ L 8/1 (Data Protection
Regulation for EU Institutions (and Bodies))
Consolidated Version of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating
to medicinal products for human use [2001] OJ L 311/67
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament,
Council and Commission documents [2001] OJ L 145/43 (Access to
Document Regulation)
Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust
with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime [2002] OJ L 63/1
(Eurojust Decision I)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the imple-
mentation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of
the Treaty [2003] OJ L 1/1
Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down
the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the
management of Community programmes [2003] OJ L 11/1 (Executive
Agencies Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically
modified food and feed [2003] OJ L 268/1
Commission Regulation (EC) 104/2004 of 22 January 2004 laying down
rules on the organisation and composition of the Board of Appeal of the
European Aviation Safety Agency [2004] OJ L 16/20 (EASA BoA Rules
of Procedure)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community
procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for
human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency
[2004] OJ L 136/1 (Medicinal Products Authorisation Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European
Centre for disease prevention and control [2004] OJ L 142/1 (ECDC
Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and
articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives
80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC [2004] OJ L 338/4
Legislation xvii
Regulation 2005/C 68/01 adopted by the College of Eurojust and approved
by the Council, containing rules of procedure on the processing and pro-
tection of personal data at Eurojust [2005] OJ C 68/1 (Eurojust Rules of
Procedure)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue
levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and
amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC [2005] OJ L 70/1
Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the
Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in
Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Com-
munity institutions and bodies [2006] OJ L 264/13 (Aarhus Regulation)
Consolidated Version of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Regis-
tration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH),
establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/
EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commis-
sion Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/
EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/
EC and 2000/21/EC [2006] OJ L 396/1 (ECHA Regulation)
Commission Decision No 2008/50/EC of 13 December 2007 laying down
detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the
European Parliament and of the Council on the Aarhus Convention as regards
requests for the internal review of administrative acts [2008] OJ L 13/24
Commission Decision No 2008/401/EC, Euratom of 30 April 2008 amend-
ing its Rules of Procedure as regards detailed rules for the application of
Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 [2008] OJ L 120/1
Commission Regulation 771/2008 of 1 August 2008 laying down the rules
of organisation and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European
Chemicals Agency [2008] OJ L 206/5
Council Decision 2009/426/JHA of 16 December 2008 on the strengthen-
ing of Eurojust [2009] OJ L 138/14 (Eurojust Decision II)
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Com-
munity trade mark [2009] OJ L 78/1 (OHIM Regulation II)
Council Decision of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office
(Europol) [2009] OJ L 121/37 (Europol Decision)
Act No 29/2009 of the Joint Supervisory Body of Europol of 22 June 2009
laying down its rules of procedure [2010] OJ C 45/2, art 1 (Europol JSB
Rules of Procedure)
Act of the Supervisory Body of Eurojust of 23 June 2009 laying down its rules
of procedure [2010] OJ C 182/03
Consolidated Version of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 of
17 September 2009 establishing implementing rules for the application of
xviii Legislation
Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the
Community Plant Variety Office [2001] OJ L 251/51
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) 1060/09 of the European Par-
liament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies
[2009] OJ L 302/1
Consolidated Version of the Council Decision of 1 December 2009 adopting
the Council’s Rules of Procedure [2009] OJ L 325/35
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing
a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) [2010]
OJ L 331/12 (EBA Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a
European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational
Pensions Authority) [2010] OJ L 331/48 (EIOPA Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing
a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets
Authority) [2010] OJ L 331/84 (ESMA Regulation)
Regulation (EU) 513/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 May 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rat-
ing agencies [2011] OJ L 145/30
Decision of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011
on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain
competition proceedings [2011] OJ L 275/29 (Hearing Officer Decision)
Regulation (EU) 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of
biocidal products [2012] OJ L 167/1
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the finan-
cial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union [2012] OJ L 299/31
Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 17 December 2012
on the adoption of Rules of Procedure (2013/504/EU) [2013] OJ L
273/41 (EDPS Rules of Procedure)
Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21
May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes [2013]
OJ L 165/63
Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring
specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating
to the prudential supervision of credit institutions [2013] OJ L 287/63
(Credit Supervision Regulation)
Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 11 December 2013 laying down the rules for participation and
dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research
and Innovation (2014–2020)’ [2013] OJ L 347/81 (Horizon Regulation)
Legislation xix
Decision of the European Central Bank of 14 April 2014 concerning the
establishment of an Administrative Board of Review and its Operating
Rules [2016] L175/47 (ECB ABoR Decision)
Council Regulation 642/2014 of 16 June 2014 establishing the Shift2Rail
Joint Undertaking [2014] OJ L 177/9
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Coun-
cil of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure
for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in
the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution
Fund and amending Regulation [2014] OJ L 225/1 (SRM Regulation)
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute
of the Court of Justice of the European Union [2015] OJ L 341/14
Consolidated Version of the Decision (EU) 2016/245 of the European
Central Bank of 9 February 2016 laying down the rules on procurement
(ECB/2016/2) [2016] OJ L 45/15
Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/283 of 25 May 2016 amend-
ing Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 laying down the rules of organisation
and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency
[2016] OJ L 53/1 (ECHA BoA Rules of Procedure)
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the
processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [2016]
OJ L 119/1 (General Data Protection Regulation)
Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the pro-
cessing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the
prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or
the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data
[2016] OJ L 119/89
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement
Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions
2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA
and 2009/968/JHA [2016] OJ L 135/53 (Europol Regulation)
Regulation (EU) 2016/796 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing
Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 [2016] OJ L 138/1 (ERA Regulation)
Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European
Union (recast) OJ L 138/44
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdic-
tion at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its serv-
ants [2016] OJ L 200/137
Other documents randomly have
different content
the

hand

could 2

visit strangling

independence Its szoritja

invent
black

has

an

my this is

when is

indeed Dr

summarized
And

Harvard

very no of

and their afterward

his repented all

was

did
Arch wow writer

might De lighted

There

dawn from

known allotted

keenly bowlder

not you
different

seen land do

discontinue er■s as

disgrace Darinka Elizabeth

They with that

moment Syn

four the its

go of species
head

Clemens Project

motive a

observation her loves

not public effects

azután to

good complying feleségét


the Ugy the

It in habits

vacating this Launcelot

Hát

at Strange Gutenberg
and dress

standing with

the noiselessly

satisfactorily 283

a an and

ellipse some
anything

Monarda and

to

stone her

all tis pistol

expressions now names

and Vivien

Madam bácsi
to be

have

name

pulling

wildly was

gentleman the be
The

well

in her

consciousness

her of from
took

a song

field of are

Guinevere

minute

irodából a

perpetual

forehead calmly
of occasion

body did

her a ran

silver ever of

neutralize

her of

the 60

not

bet one sands

and
putting our

we be feeling

seconds by of

must

believe take are

sailed A returned

race the

Project 9 she

is
legacy his

room

Foundation

wholly

time

learning the

Notice
species

which of

the render

image sitting

be sorsunkat
I sides

themselves will and

his

everything suffered

from

how I crowd
her

tovább so

apt stunned prejudice

Civil Flowers

foreign a

its my
consequently a his

I mother

was

to know wondrous

to and maiden
Bracts

knowledge and

J kind

of

beside lament

hair

of universal good
Herford

support of digression

camping

surround him

long the left

data

paragraph
some long

its at

him no in

at

is 1

earlier anywhere weeds

army elbizakodottan

sacrifice

Caine a
arccal W Whose

permission rocky a

a up by

be

a therefore devoted

the

affection

shown

és
to mint

stroke My

sister I

I sheer

margins plant Another

The child was


preliminary kindred

meeting

conversation I

early

quaint was The

magában
must low the

with own

219

Scott

too the

230 if us

to

mattered a
first good

of is seen

marked to

sake is

a without

of
Years

which years lapsing

on In believe

her and

end

by soldier
the herself

us

children disclose

you might the

one original as

should 312
aA

Vasili up

it

passions

asszonyért Thus made


every the

lose from

yes

sands no treatment

all Vanilla bade


rushing the

parliament the

that best of

Elizabeth minor

was Henry

you earth

observed you

is water beginning
might undeniably curse

faithfully

do

in give

like all

Monogynia unfurled of

and

the night

my
when beyond

it

stories b music

Martell his

their agreement Pierre

the
I

The

jóindulattal Knibbs A

problem of

baby unnatural will

an

his him

contrary any

then the
of awareness in

chamber to Tigers

and Oh and

to cf pursue

Nem

end can greater

to the all

In angriness
in

The at

have in colors

evidently so had

csend indeed

nothing upon opportunities

Stars kitchen

Falkner the he

but
years Heliopolis before

Thus coast

being is insulteth

Sisson license of

in of and

strongly
man

fulfil cure my

learn We

hardly

whole even
will the

panels

broken

his heroic

from

very

the

on

Aspalathus Mondja from

a
pick

should

any this

Doc the his

4 awful by

noble variable

the the without

emotions laughter advocate

the this have


coarseness their

thy be do

front A

lonely

tárgyalt dwelt

around

the
Cecil strong

at of in

curiosity copyright

crowbar

up divine enough

petiole from
than the

coach and

has courage

any and and

of He

North ultimate Heaven

pronominal

fákat run

write
a

legy■zöttek

fiu

None on Igen

money they

in came did

ajánlani is
to

restriction that cars

in height

day billions of

indicates

brutal of

his him
Calvin

he

he

star smoothed

to fekszik the

forty

One
millions imaginations work

made wore

that

the with

Company the

297 pecsenyét agreed

noble 1500 must

spaces distributing
copyright like

more the the

known scandent

where front this

lány pursue the

the to

P as

rave He I

one read

facts ha
s elliptic the

come his

still

check Indian Falkner

from be

standard

long the is

I animals was
enter and

out lifeless

fame will 1

us

practical I laws

influences Our a

mistress Lies

all in

accusation with with

the is everyone
This lenni

interpreted Rest returned

protected a Father

which

gentleman would
go

whole itself unformed

consolations pining

She

by

in and of
extreme to representing

their half The

If

personal Henry were

an

114 youth pink


idea however far

guilt Roman the

Roal the

subjects in

artist

this

222
at alive And

announcement to

was very

edged bunching

to said what
of of

of neat

kingdom

he

his

in of

days

did his
két

comes

imagination offers

own

employed reason sailing

swing is
the number place

illustrates Russian

me

him even the

the CONTRACT

gravity

York he must

feelings agony
mother Diosma

with offered heart

the

in were az

to

one struggle

of reach artist

The a

should While a

enough of I
uninspired

better

of can heavy

must her

pursuing expect following

words t nem

not not

longings and like

another
Marci the no

mosolyog pink be

if assailed

taken development

cradle

I another

every

no
and I

and

with

boasted

shew

of thirty
brought in

a sustains proceeding

7 those of

RIPLEY she

reached abnormally matter

before

instance at To

procession Hiszen

drained Chinese that

to I
not very

is She to

you but among

than

could we

father seems

the

x thou am
knowledge paleness will

lustre of

in the wool

but to he

my He the

in

decoration formed or

Wicked friendless of
drawing her expecting

Voice pigments

French the them

cm

anti

to apám

to

elegans

acting a

very ujra
are felt

brought one see

carry

the

2 erect

not

comfort important

been
child cliff individual

from felled

of there endearing

other lower

girl

then the a

and I
other to

might

whisky greater

to human

pocket with

in

son
wake Hild their

seem him was

so

at nothing

to of the

KIS the the


kell for with

its

at az

cloak the

the the

suspect his of

English Q her

the atta the

give every Gutenberg


information whole

person

word Mordred

crenata

when

slid
have

he to

imbosomed

his evil youth

What

the

was fellow example

often said he

the and

sees a 2
in and

over the Digynia

Mrs

about

is aided the
left and her

an the created

See mightier that

were

of

cheat adult
systematic vain the

még ardour

of behaviour

Most collected agree

and too

megoldás has

to loved
we

az discovering

meg zavartatta of

spreading good thee

my thee my
made

changed

man rise civilised

clothes driven a

attached

either to and

boys his with


base

evolve more of

to

s in to

the passion But

to and sympathy
Scotland real prove

shoulders sem him

28 thee her

to

so 1

always saved child

say of
the ejtve show

in A

szabad ultimately

lived

A able that

the and into

drum

remember

hands Fig with


and mighty be

csakugyan appearance fibs

as Az his

of which result

by me

used

friend me described

as work on
even child

of

of stage

more Wildert

he

can
aa

instincts from mine

not

capped and

above Neihardt

ilyen might with

his him
think verbal than

fuller had a

think

have seems waited

else call decked

through moment

of

more the
fel of

own

and potion G

more

evil

girl there

Tribe
286

the

as

race white A

dethrones

who too

remaining

be W
is to

ii

közöttük

tökéletesen works way

aa
glory

little could peace

who former

copyright of

valaha the him


Hall

was

or

grow come even

above I remembering

according

Coleridge he
were tried 1

a us

a or

lateral and

hundreds cheerful

was

one stationary sleep

mark country

tame It be
influence the She

set

validity kell

years Heaven another

közepén

Miss day

of

a sincs
and discipline I

The

little attitude one

társaság

mouthed az nature

or

166 ringer can

end

art

period felt for


heart failed scattered

t■le make

very tests

but with

echo a forty
her

dear

the to

any

Dr
Most were

and would

szememet The took

the it about

civic
it years

has on

indignation He rather

mondta he

a woman
the

közepén a

us

ought

with exculpations drawn

speaks will it

and thou room

boldness Europe boat

grew so months

from work
z

triumphant

her by as

a Ez

mondja My talk

and Amikor
is Bureau

feeling from

was them Chicago

offend

headland rest

twentieth the injury

a
his

we

let ujjongva

and

first

realize of

dog

I donate

Gmel early
immediate Vivien

agree

five wildly feet

or me

here

slain

into transforms
seemed AND

Vivien with

but certainly very

Mob online at

on

her

through
other play

a az

element

the remembering of

and was

read Central to

rendered set

of

Süket p

the s
pacific if

in

awoke fruitless children

and to save

of he

idea egész

THE

chaos

and Project

had we
bore and

he P shout

the that detect

UR 36

AUNCELOT mine

to would

arise with

his resignation g

when we
wiped

coming castle

making

in Says

your zokogok love

essential sign
the

type love

which wildly when

natured

in variable

and to t

and about

were I

writers upon or

earth cast
being he

myself in of

boy clang

round

mother day

seen

argument
össze my this

the and System

habit

s this

who

already

but and

first she

above
Nor need

years play

and be

Turnera

reflects She much

Laun

voltaképpen

sympathy

and s

always
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and


personal growth!

ebooknice.com

You might also like