(Ebook) Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration
: Protection of Rights versus Preservation of
Autonomy by Paola Chirulli, Luca De Lucia ISBN
9780429595691, 9780367682972, 9780367182380,
9780429060243, 0429595697, 0367682974, 0367182386,
0429060246 online version
Get your copy at ebooknice.com
( 4.6/5.0 ★ | 148 downloads )
https://ebooknice.com/product/non-judicial-remedies-and-eu-
administration-protection-of-rights-versus-preservation-of-
autonomy-43672300
(Ebook) Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration :
Protection of Rights versus Preservation of Autonomy by
Paola Chirulli, Luca De Lucia ISBN 9780429595691,
9780367682972, 9780367182380, 9780429060243, 0429595697,
0367682974, 0367182386, 0429060246 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook
EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME
INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY
Here are some recommended products that we believe you will be
interested in. You can click the link to download.
(Ebook) Biota Grow 2C gather 2C cook by Loucas, Jason; Viles, James
ISBN 9781459699816, 9781743365571, 9781925268492, 1459699815,
1743365578, 1925268497
https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374
(Ebook) Matematik 5000+ Kurs 2c Lärobok by Lena Alfredsson, Hans
Heikne, Sanna Bodemyr ISBN 9789127456600, 9127456609
https://ebooknice.com/product/matematik-5000-kurs-2c-larobok-23848312
(Ebook) SAT II Success MATH 1C and 2C 2002 (Peterson's SAT II Success)
by Peterson's ISBN 9780768906677, 0768906679
https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-
math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-s-sat-ii-success-1722018
(Ebook) Master SAT II Math 1c and 2c 4th ed (Arco Master the SAT
Subject Test: Math Levels 1 & 2) by Arco ISBN 9780768923049,
0768923042
https://ebooknice.com/product/master-sat-ii-math-1c-and-2c-4th-ed-
arco-master-the-sat-subject-test-math-levels-1-2-2326094
(Ebook) Cambridge IGCSE and O Level History Workbook 2C - Depth Study:
the United States, 1919-41 2nd Edition by Benjamin Harrison ISBN
9781398375147, 9781398375048, 1398375144, 1398375047
https://ebooknice.com/product/cambridge-igcse-and-o-level-history-
workbook-2c-depth-study-the-united-states-1919-41-2nd-edition-53538044
(Ebook) Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet : A
Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism? by Oreste Pollicino ISBN
9781509912704, 9781509912711, 9781849468053, 1509912703, 1509912711,
1849468052
https://ebooknice.com/product/judicial-protection-of-fundamental-
rights-on-the-internet-a-road-towards-digital-
constitutionalism-46486230
(Ebook) Relative Authority of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review : EU
Courts, Boards of Appeal, Ombudsman by Michal Krajewski ISBN
9781509947300, 9781509947317, 9781509947294, 9781509947324,
1509947302, 1509947310, 1509947299, 1509947329
https://ebooknice.com/product/relative-authority-of-judicial-and-
extra-judicial-review-eu-courts-boards-of-appeal-ombudsman-46505644
(Ebook) Eu Corporate Law And Eu Company Tax Law by Luca Cerioni ISBN
9781845427740, 1845427742
https://ebooknice.com/product/eu-corporate-law-and-eu-company-tax-
law-1370964
(Ebook) Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection:
Rethinking Relations Between the Echr, Eu, and National Legal Orders
by Oddny Mjoll Arnardottir; Antoine Buyse ISBN 9781138121249,
113812124X
https://ebooknice.com/product/shifting-centres-of-gravity-in-human-
rights-protection-rethinking-relations-between-the-echr-eu-and-
national-legal-orders-10415680
Non-Judicial Remedies and EU
Administration
The increasing number of executive tasks assigned to EU institutions and agencies
has resulted in a greater demand for justice that can no longer be satisfied by the
courts alone. This has led to the development of a wide range of administrative
remedies that have become a central part of the EU administrative justice system.
This book examines the important theoretical and practical issues raised by this
phenomenon.
The work focuses on five administrative remedies: internal review; administrative
appeals to the Commission against decisions of executive and decentralised
agencies; independent administrative review of decisions of decentralised agencies;
complaints to the EU Ombudsman; and complaints to the EU Data Protection
Supervisor. The research rests on the idea that there is a complex, and at times
ambivalent, relationship between administrative remedies and the varying
degrees of autonomy of EU institutions and bodies, offices and agencies. The
work draws on legislation, internal rules of executive bodies, administrative
practices and specific case law, data and statistics. This empirical approach helps to
unveil the true dynamics present within these procedures and demonstrates that
whilst administrative remedies may improve the relationship between individuals
and the EU administration, their interplay with administrative autonomy might
lead to a risk of fragmentation and incoherence in the EU administrative justice
system.
Paola Chirulli is Professor of Italian and European administrative law at the
University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’.
Luca De Lucia is Professor of Italian and European administrative law at the
University of Salerno.
Non-Judicial Remedies and
EU Administration
Protection of Rights versus Preservation
of Autonomy
Paola Chirulli and Luca De Lucia
First published 2021
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2021 Paola Chirulli and Luca De Lucia
The right of Paola Chirulli and Luca De Lucia to be identified as
authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with
sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or
reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical,
or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval
system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks
or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Chirulli, Paola, author. | De Lucia, Luca, author.
Title: Non-judicial remedies and EU administration : protection of rights
versus preservation of autonomy / Paola Chirulli and Luca de Lucia.
Other titles: Non-judicial remedies and European Union administration
Description: Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. |
Series: Routledge-giappichelli studies in law | Includes bibliographical
references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2020035528 (print) | LCCN 2020035529 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780367182380 (hardback) | ISBN 9780429060243 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Administrative remedies—European Union countries. |
Administrative procedure—European Union countries. | European Ombudsman. |
Judicial review of administrative acts—European Union countries.
Classification: LCC KJE5607 .C45 2021 (print) | LCC KJE5607
(ebook) | DDC 347.24/077—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020035528
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020035529
ISBN: 978-0-367-18238-0 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-0-429-06024-3 (ebk)
Giappichelli ISBN: 9788892135895
Typeset in Galliard
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
This book is based on research funded by the University of Rome
‘La Sapienza’, Department of Economics and Law and the University
of Salerno, Department of Political Science and Communication.
Contents
Table of casesix
Table of legislationxv
Table of abbreviationsxxii
Introduction 1
1 Reasons behind the research 1
2 Types of remedies 2
3 Methodology and research goals 5
4 Structure of the book 8
I Administrative remedies and the autonomy of
EU administrations 9
1 Administrative remedies and the direct execution
of EU law 9
2 The autonomy of EU administrations: a brief outline 12
2.1 Legislation, accountability and bureaucracy 13
2.2 The role of the EU judiciary 17
3 The autonomy of EU administrations and disputes
with private parties 18
4 Administrative remedies and models of administration 20
4.1 ‘Implementation’ and ‘adjudication’ 21
4.2 Completion of the conceptual framework 24
5 Classification of administrative remedies vis-à-vis EU
administrations 25
6 Clarifications on the investigation criteria 29
7 The autonomy of EU administrations and administrative
remedies 30
II Internal review 34
1 Introduction 34
2 Rules and practices 36
vi Contents
2.1 Proceedings of general application 36
2.2 Proceedings of specific application: examples 38
2.3 Internal review of technical and scientific assessments: examples 43
2.4 Internal review under the Aarhus Regulation 45
2.5 Special cases 48
3 Convergences: structural and functional profiles 51
4 Internal review and the Lisbon Treaty 55
4.1 Article 298 TFEU and Article 41(2) CFR: effectiveness
and efficacy of internal review 55
4.2 Article 47 CFR: right of access to justice and internal
review 59
5 An alternative model for internal review: the functions of
Hearing Officers in EU competition law 65
6 Internal review and the autonomy of EU administrations 67
III Appeals to the Commission against decisions of EU agencies 72
1 Introduction 72
2 Rules and practices 74
2.1 Decentralised agencies 74
2.2 Executive agencies 78
3 Origins and distinctive features of the appeal to the
Commission 81
3.1 Development of the institutional context 81
3.2 Features of the remedy 84
4 Article 263(5) TFEU and administrative remedies against
the acts of agencies 88
4.1 Origin and meaning 88
4.2 A judicial interpretation 90
4.3 Clarifications 92
5 Current state of the appeal to the Commission 94
5.1 Decentralised agencies 94
5.2 Executive agencies 98
6 The appeal to the Commission and the autonomy of EU
agencies 100
IV Administrative review before the EU agencies’ Boards of Appeal 103
1 Boards of Appeal: types and constitutional basis 103
2 Distinctive features of EU Boards of Appeal 107
3 The quasi-judicial nature of Boards of Appeal 112
4 Proceedings before Boards of Appeal 115
4.1 Standing and entitled parties 116
Contents vii
4.2 Terms, conditions and procedures for lodging appeals;
decisions subject to appeal 118
4.3 Effects of the appeal 122
4.4 Appeal proceedings 124
5 Scope and intensity of the review before EU agencies’ Boards of
Appeal 128
5.1 The notice of appeal and the decision-making powers of
Boards of Appeal 130
5.2 Questions of law and fact 133
5.3 Review of technical issues and substitutive powers: between
adjudication and implementation 136
6 Boards of Appeal, protection of private interests and autonomy
of agencies 146
V Complaints to the European Ombudsman 157
1 Constitutional basis and distinctive features 157
2 The complaint 164
2.1 Admissibility requirements 164
2.2 Content and issues that can be raised 169
3 The Ombudsman’s scope and investigative powers 172
4 Quality and intensity of review: beyond legality 173
5 Type and effects of decisions: adjudication, implementation
and regulation 178
6 The Ombudsman’s powers and the autonomy of European
administrations 185
VI Administrative remedies and personal data processing 190
1 Introduction 190
2 Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor 193
2.1 The complaint procedure 193
2.2 Functional and factual aspects 196
2.3 Complaints to the EDPS and administrative
autonomy 200
3 Administrative protection vis-à-vis Europol personal data
processing 202
3.1 The Europol Decision and appeals to the Joint Supervisory
Body 203
3.2 The Europol Regulation and complaints to the EDPS 207
4 The evolution of Eurojust within the EU data protection
system 209
viii Contents
4.1 Appeals before the Joint Supervisory Body. Regulation,
cases and problems 213
4.2 The 2018 Eurojust Regulation and prospects for personal
data protection 216
5 Conclusions 219
VII Accountability, transformative tensions and the need for
constitutionalisation 221
1 Introduction 221
2 Administrative remedies and the accountability of EU
administrations 222
2.1 Administrative remedies and the emergence of disputes in
EU law 222
2.2 Political direction and control 224
2.3 Bureaucratic control 227
3 Administrative remedies and EU courts 230
3.1 Administrative remedies and access to judicial
review 232
3.2 Administrative and judicial protection, between
‘separation’ and ‘contamination’ 238
3.3 The influence of EU courts on the administrations’
autonomy in resolving conflicts with private parties 244
4 Tensions and possible developments 249
4.1 Internal review and the influence of New Public
Management 249
4.2 The Boards of Appeal within EU agencies 252
4.3 Administrative remedies provided for in the Treaty 256
5 Administrative remedies and the uncertainty regarding the
rights of private parties 258
6 Towards the constitutionalisation of administrative
remedies 260
6.1 The problem 260
6.2 A possible role for the legislature 261
6.3 The role of the CJEU and legal scholarship 264
Index267
Cases
Court of Justice
case 9/56 Meroni v High Authority EU:C:1958:7
case 10/56 Meroni v High Authority EU:C:1958:8
case 58/75 Sergy v Commission EU:C:1976:102
case 33/79 Kuhner v Commission EU:C:1980:139
case 101/79 Vecchioli v Commission EU:C:1980:243
case 34/80 Authié v Commission EU:C:1981:57
case 98/80 Romano EU:C:1981:104
case 294/83 Parti écologiste ‘Les Verts’ v European Parliament EU:C:1986:166
case 133/88 Del Amo Martinez v Parliament EU:C:1989:124
joined cases 41 and 178/88 Becker and Starquit v European Parliament
EU:C:1989:369
C-404/92 P X v Commission EU:C:1994:361
C-234/02 P European Ombudsman v Frank Lamberts EU:C:2004:174
C-106/03 P Vedial SA v OHIM EU:C:2004:611
C-123/03 P Commission v Greencore Group plc EU:C:2004:783
C-160/03 Kingdom of Spain v Eurojust EU:C:2005:168
C-29/05 P OHIM v Kaul EU:C:2007:162
C-167/06 P Komninou v Commission EU:C:2007:633
C-362/08 P Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission EU:C:2010:40
C-580/08 P Srinivasan v EU Ombudsman EU:C:2009:402
C-38/09 P CPVO v Schräder EU:C:2013:679
C-362/09 P Athinaïki Techniki AE v Commission EU:C:2010:492, Opinion
of AG Bot
C-263/09 P Edwin v OHIM EU:C:2011:452
C-534/10 P Brookfield and Elaris v CPVO EU:C:2012:813
C-53/11 P OHIM v Nike International EU:C:2012:27
C-610/11 P Centrotherm Systemtechnik v OHIM EU:C:2013:593
C-621/11 P New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHIM EU:C:2013:484
C-625/11 P PPG and SNF v ECHA EU:C:2013:594
C-270/12 United Kingdom v European Parliament EU:C:2014:18
x Cases
C-404 and 405/12 P Council of the European Union and Commission v Sticht-
ing Natuur and Others EU:C:2015:5
C-530/12 P OHIM v National Lottery Commission EU:C:2013:782, Opin-
ion of AG Bot
C-546/12 P Ralf Schräder v CPVO EU:C:2015:332, Opinion of AG
Sharpston EU:C:2014:2373
C-261/13 P Schönberger v European Parliament EU:C:2014:2423
C-290/13 P Rütgers v ECHA EU:C:2014:2174
C-43/15 P BSH v EUIPO EU:C:2016:837
C-61/15 P Heliflight GmbH v EASA EU:C:2016:59
C-226/15 P Apple and Pear Austria and Star Fruits Diffusion v EUIPO
EU:C:2016:582; Opinion of AG Bobek EU:C:2016:250
C-337/15 P European Ombudsman v Staelen EU:C:2017:253
C-577/15 P Capital OÜ v EBA EU:C:2016:947
C-625/15 P Schniga v CPVO EU:C:2017:435
C-73/16 Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Krim-
inálny úrad finančnej správy EU:C:2017:725; Opinion of AG Kokott
EU:C:2017:253
C-326/16 P LL v European Parliament EU:C:2018:83; Opinion of AG
Szpunar EU:C:2017:605
C-379/16 P European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others v EUIPO
EU:C:2016:905
C-82/17 P TestBioTech eV and Others v Commission EU:C:2019:719; Opin-
ion of AG Szpunar EU:C:2018:837
C-450/17 P Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg v ECB EU:C:2019:372
C-576/17 P(R)-R Wall Street Systems UK Ltd v ECB EU:C:2017:735
C-702/18 P ‘Primart’ v EUIPO EU:C:2019:1030, Opinion of AG Bobek
C-794/18 P Pracsis SPRL and Conceptexpo Project v EACEA EU:C:2019:305
C-71/19 P Barata v European Parliament EU:C:2019:793
C-444/19 P Kiku v CPVO EU:C:2019:746
C-577/19 P KID-Systeme GmbH v EUIPO EU:C:2019:854
C-614/19 P Porsche v EUIPO EU:C:2019:904
C-586/19 P L’Oréal v EUIPO EU:C:2019:845
General Court/Court of First Instance
T-121/89 and 13/90 X v Commission EU:T:1992:96
T-10/93 A v Commission EU:T:1994:39
T-148/97 Keeling v OHIM EU:T:1998:114
T-300/97 Latino v Commission EU:T:1999:328
T-163/98 Procter & Gamble v OHIM EU:T:1999:145
T-186/98 Inpesca v Commission EU:T:2001:42
T-5/99 Andriotis v Commission and Cedefop EU:T:2000:37
T-122/99 Procter & Gamble v OHIM EU:T:2000:39
T-189/99 Gerochristos v Commission EU:T:2001:12
Cases xi
T-65/00 Ioannou v Council EU:T:2001:14
T-74, 76, 83, 84, 85, 132, 137 and 141/00 Artegodan v Commission EU:T:
2002:283
T-209/00 Lamberts v European Ombudsman EU:T:2002:94
T-47/01 Co-Frutta Soc. coop. v Commission EU:T:2003:272
T-63/01 Procter & Gamble v OHIM EU:T:2002:317
T-219/01 Commerzbank AG v Commission EU:T:2003:201
T-308/01 Henkel v OHIM EU:T:2003:241
T‑273/02 Krüger v OHIM EU:T:2005:134
T-308/02 SGL Carbon AG v Commission EU:T:2004:119
T-49/03 Schumann v Commission EU:T:2004:314
T-57/03 SPAG v OHIM EU:T:2005:29
T-110/03 Sison v Council EU:T:2005:143
T-112/03 L’Oréal v OHMI – Revlon EU:T:2005:102
T-133/03 Schering-Plough Ltd v Commission and EMEA EU:T:2007:365
T-198/03 Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG v Commission EU:T:2006:136
T-191/04 MIP Metro v OHMI – Tesco Stores EU:T:2006:254
T-252/04 Caviar Anzali v OHIM EU:T:2006:199
T-355 and 446/04 Co-Frutta Soc. coop. v Commission EU:T:2010:15
T-380/04 Terezakis v Commission EU:T:2008:19
T-474/04 Pergan Hilfsstoffe v Commission EU:T:2007:306
T-237/05 Éditions Odile Jacob SAS v Commission EU:T:2010:224
T-165/06 Fiorucci v OHMI – Edwin EU:T:2009:157
T-171/06 Laytoncrest v OHMI – Erico (TRENTON) EU:T:2009:70
T-187/06 Ralf Schräder v CPVO EU:T:2013:522
T-411/06 Sogelma v AER EU:T:2008:419
T-211/07 Awww v Eurofound EU:T:2011:415
T-234/07 Grolsch v Commission EU:T:2011:476
T-407/07 CMB Maschinenbau v Commission EU:T:2011:477
T-133 and 134/08 Ralf Schräder v CPVO EU:T:2012:430
T-135/08 Schniga v CPVO EU:T:2010:397
T-176/08 Infeurope v Commission EU:T:2009:264
T-188/08 Infeurope v Commission EU:T:2009:265
T-196/08 Srinivasan v European Ombudsman EU:T:2008:470
T-292/08 Inditex v OHIM EU:T:2020:399
T-338/08 Stichting Natuur v Commission EU:T:2012:300
T-377/08 P Commission v Birkhoff EU:T:2009:485
T-457/08 R Intel Corp. v Commission EU:T:2009:18
T-164/09 Kitou v EDPS EU:T:2010:533
T-284/09 P H. Meister v OHIM T:2010:246
T-359/09 Jurašinović v Council EU:T:2010:241
T-396/09 Vereniging Milieudefensie v Commission EU:T:2012:301
T-415/09 New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHMI – Vallis K. – Vallis A. EU:T:2011:550
T-468/09 JSK International Architekten et al. v ECB EU:T:2012:639
T-96/10 Rütgers v ECHA EU:T:2013:109
xii Cases
T-268/10 Polyelectrolyte Producers Group v ECHA EU:T:2015:698
T-277/10 K v Eurojust EU:T:2010:485
T-278/10 Wesergold Getränkeindustrie v OHIM – Lidl Stiftung EU:T:2012:459
T-217/11 Staelen v European Ombudsman EU:T:2015:238
T-299/11 European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO EU:T:
2015:757
T-345/11 ENISA v EDPS EU:T:2011:700
T-476/11 P Moschonaki v Commission EU:T:2013:557
T-553/11 European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB EU:T:2014:275
T-556/11 European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EUIPO
EU:T:2013:514
T-577/11 Ethniko kai Kapodistriako Panepistimio Athinon v European Centre
for Disease Prevention and Control EU:T:2013:229
T-608/11 Beifa Group v OHIM – Schwan-Stabilo Schwanhäußer EU:T:2013:334
T-132/12 Scooters India v OHIM EU:T:2014:843
T-192/12 PAN Europe v Commission EU:T:2014:152
T-235/12 CEDC International v OHMI – Underberg EU:T:2014:1058
T-283/12 FIS’D – Formazione integrata superiore del design v Commission
EU:T:2014:933
T-347/12 P Mocová v Commission EU:T:2014:268
T-537/12 Zafeiropoulos v CEDEFOP EU:T:2016:36
T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM EU:T:2015:281
T-89/13 Calestep v ECHA EU:T:2015:711
T-102/13 Heliflight GmbH v EASA EU:T:2014:1064
T-177/13 TestBioTech and Others v Commission EU:T:2016:736
T-201/13 Rubinum v Commission EU:T:2015:311
T-343/13 CN v European Parliament EU:T:2015:926
T-405/13 Le Comptoir d’Épicure v OHIM T:2014:1072
T-609/13 Blackrock v OHIM EU:T:2015:54
T-620/13 Marchi Industriale v ECHA EU:T:2016:479
T-673/13 European Coalition to End Animal Experiments v ECHA EU:T:
2015:167
T-695/13 Enac v Commission and INEA EU:T:2014:924
T-424/14 ClientEarth v Commission EU:T:2015:848
T-587/14 Crosfield v ECHA EU:T:2016:475
T-652/14 AF Steelcase, SA v EUIPO EU:T:2016:370
T-660/14 SV Capital OÜ v EBA EU:T:2015:608
T-724/14 European Children’s Fashion Association and Others v EACEA
EU:T:2015:550
T-787/14 P ECB v Cerafogli EU:T:2016:633
T-791/14 Bensarsa v Commission and EDPS EU:T:2015:267
T-816/14 Tayto Group v OHIM, EU:T:2016:93
T-104/15 Symvouleftiki v Commission EU:T:2018:360
T-122/15 Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg v ECB EU:T:2017:337
T-140/15 Aurora srl v CPVO EU:2017:380
T-286/15 KF v SatCen EU:T:2018:718
Cases xiii
T-411/15 PP Gappol Marzena Porczinska v EUIPO EU:T:2017:689
T-564/15 Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV v Commission EU:T:2016:611
T-603/15 Frank v Commission EU:T:2017:228
T-604/15 Ertico – ITS Europe v Commission EU:T:2019:348
T-712/15 Crédit mutuel Arkéa v ECB EU:T:2017:900
T-36/16 Enercon GmbH v EUIPO EU:T:2017:295
T-140/16 Jean-Marie Le Pen v European Parliament EU:T:2016:645
T-237/16 NI v EDPS EU:T:2016:542
T-247/16 Trasta Komercbanka AS v ECB EU:T:2017:623
T-478/16 Frank v Commission EU:T:2019:399
T-581/16 Popotas v European Ombudsman EU:T:2018:169
T-803/16 Glaxo Group Ltd v EUIPO EU:T:2018:330
T-817/16 Vans v EUIPO EU:T:2018:880
T-125/17 BASF Grenzach v ECHA EU:T:2019:638
T-452/17 TL v EDPS EU:T:2018:418
T-463/17 Raise Conseil v EUIPO EU:T:2018:249
T-579/17 Wall Street Systems UK Ltd v ECB EU:T:2017:668
T-717/17 Chioreanu v ERCEA EU:T:2018:765
T-755/17 Federal Republic of Germany v ECHA EU:T:2019:647
T-765/17 Kiku GmbH v CPVO EU:T:2019:244
T-33/18 Pracsis SPRL and Conceptexpo Project v EACEA EU:T:2018:656
T-112/18 Pink Lady America LLC v CPVO EU:T:2019:679
T-233/18 Anastasia-Soultana Gaki v EDPS EU:T:2018:629
T-676/18 Silvain Rimlinger v European Ombudsman EU:T:2019:125
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
F-95/05 N v Commission EU:F:2007:226
F-2/07 Martins v Commission EU:F:2010:22
F-45/07 Mandt v European Parliament EU:F:2010:72
F-33/08 V v Commission EU:F:2009:141
F-77/08 I.V. Carbajosa and Others v Commission EU:F:2010:133
F-46/09 V v European Parliament EU:F:2011:101
F-26/10 AZ v Commission EU:F:2011:163
F-66/11 Alma Yael v Commission F:2012:88
F-103/11 CG v European Investment Bank EU:F:2014:185
F-26/12 Cerafogli v ECB EU:F:2014:218
F-128/12 CR v European Parliament EU:F:2014:38
F-107/13 de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission EU:F:2014:232
F-142/14 De Almeida Pereira v Eurojust EU:F:2015:83
European Court of Human Rights
case No 6232/73 König v Germany ECHR:1980:0310JUD000623273
case No 6878/75 Le Compte and Others v Belgium ECHR:1981:0623JUD
000687875
xiv Cases
case No 13616/88 Hentrich v France ECHR:1994:0922JUD001361688
case No 23959/94 Janssen v Germany ECHR:2001:1220JUD002395994
case No 41959/08 Anastasakis v Greece ECHR:2011:1206JUD004195908
case No 53339/09 Siermiński v Poland ECHR:2014:1202JUD005333909
United Kingdom Supreme Court
R (Bradley) v Secretary of State and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 36, [2009]
QB 114
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, [2012] 1 AC 663
JR55 [2016] UKSC 22
Legislation
Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union [2016] OJ C 202/13
(TEU)
Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
[2016] OJ C 202/447 (TFEU)
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2016] OJ C 202/389
(CFR)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation No 31 (EEC) and No 11 (EAEC) lay-
ing down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employ-
ment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and
the European Atomic Energy Community [1962] OJ P 45/1385 (Staff
Regulations)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of the Council of
10 February 1975 establishing a European Centre for the Development of
Vocational Training [1975] OJ L 39/1 (CEDEFOP Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of
26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the improve-
ment of living and working conditions [1975] OJ L 139/1 (EUROFOND
Regulation)
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Commu-
nity trade mark [1994] OJ L 11/1, art 118 (OHIM Regulation)
Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9
March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the per-
formance of the Ombudsman’s duties [1994] OJ L 113/15
Consolidated Version of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18
July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
[1994] OJ L 216/1 (EU-OSHA Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27
July 1994 on Community plant variety rights [1994] OJ L 227/1 (CPVO
Regulation)
Council Act of 26 July 1995 drawing up the Convention based on Article
K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the establishment of a European
Police Office [1995] OJ C 316/1 (Europol Convention)
xvi Legislation
Consolidated Version of Rules of Procedure of the Commission [2000] OJ L
308/26
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the
processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and
on the free movement of such data [2001] OJ L 8/1 (Data Protection
Regulation for EU Institutions (and Bodies))
Consolidated Version of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating
to medicinal products for human use [2001] OJ L 311/67
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament,
Council and Commission documents [2001] OJ L 145/43 (Access to
Document Regulation)
Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust
with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime [2002] OJ L 63/1
(Eurojust Decision I)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the imple-
mentation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of
the Treaty [2003] OJ L 1/1
Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down
the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the
management of Community programmes [2003] OJ L 11/1 (Executive
Agencies Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically
modified food and feed [2003] OJ L 268/1
Commission Regulation (EC) 104/2004 of 22 January 2004 laying down
rules on the organisation and composition of the Board of Appeal of the
European Aviation Safety Agency [2004] OJ L 16/20 (EASA BoA Rules
of Procedure)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community
procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for
human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency
[2004] OJ L 136/1 (Medicinal Products Authorisation Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 establishing a European
Centre for disease prevention and control [2004] OJ L 142/1 (ECDC
Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and
articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives
80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC [2004] OJ L 338/4
Legislation xvii
Regulation 2005/C 68/01 adopted by the College of Eurojust and approved
by the Council, containing rules of procedure on the processing and pro-
tection of personal data at Eurojust [2005] OJ C 68/1 (Eurojust Rules of
Procedure)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue
levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and
amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC [2005] OJ L 70/1
Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the
Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in
Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Com-
munity institutions and bodies [2006] OJ L 264/13 (Aarhus Regulation)
Consolidated Version of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Regis-
tration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH),
establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/
EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commis-
sion Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/
EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/
EC and 2000/21/EC [2006] OJ L 396/1 (ECHA Regulation)
Commission Decision No 2008/50/EC of 13 December 2007 laying down
detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the
European Parliament and of the Council on the Aarhus Convention as regards
requests for the internal review of administrative acts [2008] OJ L 13/24
Commission Decision No 2008/401/EC, Euratom of 30 April 2008 amend-
ing its Rules of Procedure as regards detailed rules for the application of
Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 [2008] OJ L 120/1
Commission Regulation 771/2008 of 1 August 2008 laying down the rules
of organisation and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European
Chemicals Agency [2008] OJ L 206/5
Council Decision 2009/426/JHA of 16 December 2008 on the strengthen-
ing of Eurojust [2009] OJ L 138/14 (Eurojust Decision II)
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Com-
munity trade mark [2009] OJ L 78/1 (OHIM Regulation II)
Council Decision of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office
(Europol) [2009] OJ L 121/37 (Europol Decision)
Act No 29/2009 of the Joint Supervisory Body of Europol of 22 June 2009
laying down its rules of procedure [2010] OJ C 45/2, art 1 (Europol JSB
Rules of Procedure)
Act of the Supervisory Body of Eurojust of 23 June 2009 laying down its rules
of procedure [2010] OJ C 182/03
Consolidated Version of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 of
17 September 2009 establishing implementing rules for the application of
xviii Legislation
Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the
Community Plant Variety Office [2001] OJ L 251/51
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EC) 1060/09 of the European Par-
liament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies
[2009] OJ L 302/1
Consolidated Version of the Council Decision of 1 December 2009 adopting
the Council’s Rules of Procedure [2009] OJ L 325/35
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing
a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) [2010]
OJ L 331/12 (EBA Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a
European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational
Pensions Authority) [2010] OJ L 331/48 (EIOPA Regulation)
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing
a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets
Authority) [2010] OJ L 331/84 (ESMA Regulation)
Regulation (EU) 513/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 May 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rat-
ing agencies [2011] OJ L 145/30
Decision of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011
on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain
competition proceedings [2011] OJ L 275/29 (Hearing Officer Decision)
Regulation (EU) 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of
biocidal products [2012] OJ L 167/1
Consolidated Version of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the finan-
cial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union [2012] OJ L 299/31
Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 17 December 2012
on the adoption of Rules of Procedure (2013/504/EU) [2013] OJ L
273/41 (EDPS Rules of Procedure)
Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21
May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes [2013]
OJ L 165/63
Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring
specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating
to the prudential supervision of credit institutions [2013] OJ L 287/63
(Credit Supervision Regulation)
Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 11 December 2013 laying down the rules for participation and
dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research
and Innovation (2014–2020)’ [2013] OJ L 347/81 (Horizon Regulation)
Legislation xix
Decision of the European Central Bank of 14 April 2014 concerning the
establishment of an Administrative Board of Review and its Operating
Rules [2016] L175/47 (ECB ABoR Decision)
Council Regulation 642/2014 of 16 June 2014 establishing the Shift2Rail
Joint Undertaking [2014] OJ L 177/9
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Coun-
cil of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure
for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in
the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution
Fund and amending Regulation [2014] OJ L 225/1 (SRM Regulation)
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute
of the Court of Justice of the European Union [2015] OJ L 341/14
Consolidated Version of the Decision (EU) 2016/245 of the European
Central Bank of 9 February 2016 laying down the rules on procurement
(ECB/2016/2) [2016] OJ L 45/15
Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/283 of 25 May 2016 amend-
ing Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 laying down the rules of organisation
and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency
[2016] OJ L 53/1 (ECHA BoA Rules of Procedure)
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the
processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [2016]
OJ L 119/1 (General Data Protection Regulation)
Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the pro-
cessing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the
prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or
the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data
[2016] OJ L 119/89
Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement
Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions
2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA
and 2009/968/JHA [2016] OJ L 135/53 (Europol Regulation)
Regulation (EU) 2016/796 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing
Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 [2016] OJ L 138/1 (ERA Regulation)
Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European
Union (recast) OJ L 138/44
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdic-
tion at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its serv-
ants [2016] OJ L 200/137
Other documents randomly have
different content
the
hand
could 2
visit strangling
independence Its szoritja
invent
black
has
an
my this is
when is
indeed Dr
summarized
And
Harvard
very no of
and their afterward
his repented all
was
did
Arch wow writer
might De lighted
There
dawn from
known allotted
keenly bowlder
not you
different
seen land do
discontinue er■s as
disgrace Darinka Elizabeth
They with that
moment Syn
four the its
go of species
head
Clemens Project
motive a
observation her loves
not public effects
azután to
good complying feleségét
the Ugy the
It in habits
vacating this Launcelot
Hát
at Strange Gutenberg
and dress
standing with
the noiselessly
satisfactorily 283
a an and
ellipse some
anything
Monarda and
to
stone her
all tis pistol
expressions now names
and Vivien
Madam bácsi
to be
have
name
pulling
wildly was
gentleman the be
The
well
in her
consciousness
her of from
took
a song
field of are
Guinevere
minute
irodából a
perpetual
forehead calmly
of occasion
body did
her a ran
silver ever of
neutralize
her of
the 60
not
bet one sands
and
putting our
we be feeling
seconds by of
must
believe take are
sailed A returned
race the
Project 9 she
is
legacy his
room
Foundation
wholly
time
learning the
Notice
species
which of
the render
image sitting
be sorsunkat
I sides
themselves will and
his
everything suffered
from
how I crowd
her
tovább so
apt stunned prejudice
Civil Flowers
foreign a
its my
consequently a his
I mother
was
to know wondrous
to and maiden
Bracts
knowledge and
J kind
of
beside lament
hair
of universal good
Herford
support of digression
camping
surround him
long the left
data
paragraph
some long
its at
him no in
at
is 1
earlier anywhere weeds
army elbizakodottan
sacrifice
Caine a
arccal W Whose
permission rocky a
a up by
be
a therefore devoted
the
affection
shown
és
to mint
stroke My
sister I
I sheer
margins plant Another
The child was
preliminary kindred
meeting
conversation I
early
quaint was The
magában
must low the
with own
219
Scott
too the
230 if us
to
mattered a
first good
of is seen
marked to
sake is
a without
of
Years
which years lapsing
on In believe
her and
end
by soldier
the herself
us
children disclose
you might the
one original as
should 312
aA
Vasili up
it
passions
asszonyért Thus made
every the
lose from
yes
sands no treatment
all Vanilla bade
rushing the
parliament the
that best of
Elizabeth minor
was Henry
you earth
observed you
is water beginning
might undeniably curse
faithfully
do
in give
like all
Monogynia unfurled of
and
the night
my
when beyond
it
stories b music
Martell his
their agreement Pierre
the
I
The
jóindulattal Knibbs A
problem of
baby unnatural will
an
his him
contrary any
then the
of awareness in
chamber to Tigers
and Oh and
to cf pursue
Nem
end can greater
to the all
In angriness
in
The at
have in colors
evidently so had
csend indeed
nothing upon opportunities
Stars kitchen
Falkner the he
but
years Heliopolis before
Thus coast
being is insulteth
Sisson license of
in of and
strongly
man
fulfil cure my
learn We
hardly
whole even
will the
panels
broken
his heroic
from
very
the
on
Aspalathus Mondja from
a
pick
should
any this
Doc the his
4 awful by
noble variable
the the without
emotions laughter advocate
the this have
coarseness their
thy be do
front A
lonely
tárgyalt dwelt
around
the
Cecil strong
at of in
curiosity copyright
crowbar
up divine enough
petiole from
than the
coach and
has courage
any and and
of He
North ultimate Heaven
pronominal
fákat run
write
a
legy■zöttek
fiu
None on Igen
money they
in came did
ajánlani is
to
restriction that cars
in height
day billions of
indicates
brutal of
his him
Calvin
he
he
star smoothed
to fekszik the
forty
One
millions imaginations work
made wore
that
the with
Company the
297 pecsenyét agreed
noble 1500 must
spaces distributing
copyright like
more the the
known scandent
where front this
lány pursue the
the to
P as
rave He I
one read
facts ha
s elliptic the
come his
still
check Indian Falkner
from be
standard
long the is
I animals was
enter and
out lifeless
fame will 1
us
practical I laws
influences Our a
mistress Lies
all in
accusation with with
the is everyone
This lenni
interpreted Rest returned
protected a Father
which
gentleman would
go
whole itself unformed
consolations pining
She
by
in and of
extreme to representing
their half The
If
personal Henry were
an
114 youth pink
idea however far
guilt Roman the
Roal the
subjects in
artist
this
222
at alive And
announcement to
was very
edged bunching
to said what
of of
of neat
kingdom
he
his
in of
days
did his
két
comes
imagination offers
own
employed reason sailing
swing is
the number place
illustrates Russian
me
him even the
the CONTRACT
gravity
York he must
feelings agony
mother Diosma
with offered heart
the
in were az
to
one struggle
of reach artist
The a
should While a
enough of I
uninspired
better
of can heavy
must her
pursuing expect following
words t nem
not not
longings and like
another
Marci the no
mosolyog pink be
if assailed
taken development
cradle
I another
every
no
and I
and
with
boasted
shew
of thirty
brought in
a sustains proceeding
7 those of
RIPLEY she
reached abnormally matter
before
instance at To
procession Hiszen
drained Chinese that
to I
not very
is She to
you but among
than
could we
father seems
the
x thou am
knowledge paleness will
lustre of
in the wool
but to he
my He the
in
decoration formed or
Wicked friendless of
drawing her expecting
Voice pigments
French the them
cm
anti
to apám
to
elegans
acting a
very ujra
are felt
brought one see
carry
the
2 erect
not
comfort important
been
child cliff individual
from felled
of there endearing
other lower
girl
then the a
and I
other to
might
whisky greater
to human
pocket with
in
son
wake Hild their
seem him was
so
at nothing
to of the
KIS the the
kell for with
its
at az
cloak the
the the
suspect his of
English Q her
the atta the
give every Gutenberg
information whole
person
word Mordred
crenata
when
slid
have
he to
imbosomed
his evil youth
What
the
was fellow example
often said he
the and
sees a 2
in and
over the Digynia
Mrs
about
is aided the
left and her
an the created
See mightier that
were
of
cheat adult
systematic vain the
még ardour
of behaviour
Most collected agree
and too
megoldás has
to loved
we
az discovering
meg zavartatta of
spreading good thee
my thee my
made
changed
man rise civilised
clothes driven a
attached
either to and
boys his with
base
evolve more of
to
s in to
the passion But
to and sympathy
Scotland real prove
shoulders sem him
28 thee her
to
so 1
always saved child
say of
the ejtve show
in A
szabad ultimately
lived
A able that
the and into
drum
remember
hands Fig with
and mighty be
csakugyan appearance fibs
as Az his
of which result
by me
used
friend me described
as work on
even child
of
of stage
more Wildert
he
can
aa
instincts from mine
not
capped and
above Neihardt
ilyen might with
his him
think verbal than
fuller had a
think
have seems waited
else call decked
through moment
of
more the
fel of
own
and potion G
more
evil
girl there
Tribe
286
the
as
race white A
dethrones
who too
remaining
be W
is to
ii
közöttük
tökéletesen works way
aa
glory
little could peace
who former
copyright of
valaha the him
Hall
was
or
grow come even
above I remembering
according
Coleridge he
were tried 1
a us
a or
lateral and
hundreds cheerful
was
one stationary sleep
mark country
tame It be
influence the She
set
validity kell
years Heaven another
közepén
Miss day
of
a sincs
and discipline I
The
little attitude one
társaság
mouthed az nature
or
166 ringer can
end
art
period felt for
heart failed scattered
t■le make
very tests
but with
echo a forty
her
dear
the to
any
Dr
Most were
and would
szememet The took
the it about
civic
it years
has on
indignation He rather
mondta he
a woman
the
közepén a
us
ought
with exculpations drawn
speaks will it
and thou room
boldness Europe boat
grew so months
from work
z
triumphant
her by as
a Ez
mondja My talk
and Amikor
is Bureau
feeling from
was them Chicago
offend
headland rest
twentieth the injury
a
his
we
let ujjongva
and
first
realize of
dog
I donate
Gmel early
immediate Vivien
agree
five wildly feet
or me
here
slain
into transforms
seemed AND
Vivien with
but certainly very
Mob online at
on
her
through
other play
a az
element
the remembering of
and was
read Central to
rendered set
of
Süket p
the s
pacific if
in
awoke fruitless children
and to save
of he
idea egész
THE
chaos
and Project
had we
bore and
he P shout
the that detect
UR 36
AUNCELOT mine
to would
arise with
his resignation g
when we
wiped
coming castle
making
in Says
your zokogok love
essential sign
the
type love
which wildly when
natured
in variable
and to t
and about
were I
writers upon or
earth cast
being he
myself in of
boy clang
round
mother day
seen
argument
össze my this
the and System
habit
s this
who
already
but and
first she
above
Nor need
years play
and be
Turnera
reflects She much
Laun
voltaképpen
sympathy
and s
always
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and
personal growth!
ebooknice.com