Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production :

Beneficial and Deleterious Effects First Edition

Altman digital version 2025

Sold on textbookfull.com
( 4.8/5.0 ★ | 446 downloads )

https://textbookfull.com/product/pesticide-interactions-in-crop-
production-beneficial-and-deleterious-effects-first-edition-altman/
 Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production : Beneficial and
Deleterious Effects First Edition Altman

TEXTBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Phosphorus management in crop production 1st Edition

Nand Kumar Fageria

https://textbookfull.com/product/phosphorus-management-in-crop-
production-1st-edition-nand-kumar-fageria/

Advances in Cotton Science-Botany, Production, and Crop

Improvement 1st Edition Ratikanta Maiti (Author)

https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-cotton-science-
botany-production-and-crop-improvement-1st-edition-ratikanta-
maiti-author/

Nutrient Dynamics for Sustainable Crop Production Ram

Swaroop Meena

https://textbookfull.com/product/nutrient-dynamics-for-
sustainable-crop-production-ram-swaroop-meena/

Sustainable Intensification of Crop Production 1st

Edition P. Parvatha Reddy (Auth.)

https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-intensification-of-
crop-production-1st-edition-p-parvatha-reddy-auth/
Beer Production Consumption Health Effects William H
Salazar

https://textbookfull.com/product/beer-production-consumption-
health-effects-william-h-salazar/

Maize Crop-Improvement, Production, Protection and Post

Harvest Technology 1st Edition A. Solaimalai (Author)

https://textbookfull.com/product/maize-crop-improvement-
production-protection-and-post-harvest-technology-1st-edition-a-
solaimalai-author/

Agriculturally Important Microbes for Sustainable

Agriculture Volume 2 Applications in Crop Production
and Protection 1st Edition Arunava Pattanayak

https://textbookfull.com/product/agriculturally-important-
microbes-for-sustainable-agriculture-volume-2-applications-in-
crop-production-and-protection-1st-edition-arunava-pattanayak/

Crop Production Technologies for Sustainable Use and

Conservation Physiological and Molecular Advances 1st
Edition Munir Ozturk

https://textbookfull.com/product/crop-production-technologies-
for-sustainable-use-and-conservation-physiological-and-molecular-
advances-1st-edition-munir-ozturk/

Engaging First Peoples in Arts-Based Service Learning:

Towards Respectful and Mutually Beneficial Educational
Practices 1st Edition Brydie-Leigh Bartleet

https://textbookfull.com/product/engaging-first-peoples-in-arts-
based-service-learning-towards-respectful-and-mutually-
beneficial-educational-practices-1st-edition-brydie-leigh-
CRC REVIVALS CRC REVIVALS

Edited by Jack Altman

Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production
Pesticide Interactions in Crop
Production
Beneficial and Deleterious Effects

Edited by
Jack Altman

ISBN 978-1-315-89635-9

,!7IB3B5-ijgdfj!
www.crcpress.com
 PESTICIDE
INTERACTIONS
zn
•

CROP
PRODUCTION
Beneficial and Deleterious Effects

Edited by
Jack Altman, Ph.D.
Plant Pathology and Weed Science
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, Colorado

Boca Raton London New York

CRC Press
CRC Press is an imprint of the
Boca Raton AnnGroup,
Taylor & Francis Arbor London
an informa business Tokyo
First published 1993 by CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742

Reissued 2018 by CRC Press

© 1993 by CRC Press, Inc.

CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

No claim to original U.S. Government works

This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish
reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the
consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this
publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.

Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form
by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording,
or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.

For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.
com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a
not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a
photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.

Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Pesticide interactions in crop production : beneficial and deleterious

effects / Jack Altman.
  p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8493-6339-X
1. Pesticides. 2. Plants. Effect of pesticides on. 3. Crops-
-Physiology. 4. Pesticides—Environmental aspects. I. Altman,
Jack, 1924-
SB951.P432 1993
632’ .95—dc20 92-26913

A Library of Congress record exists under LC control number: 92026913

Publisher’s Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies
may be apparent.

Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to
contact.

ISBN 13: 978-1-315-89635-9 (hbk)

ISBN 13: 978-1-351-07545-9 (ebk)

Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com and the
CRC Press Web site at http://www.crcpress.com
 Dedication

This book is dedicated to my wife, Roslyn

 PREFACE
Modem pesticides are designed to act against crop pests while exerting minimum impact on non-
target organisms and the environment. However, some pesticides may affect the environment if they
are misused or persist. Priorities for pest control are constantly changing with increasing emphasis on
environmental issues. The pesticide industry is more sensitive than ever to such issues. The aim is to
find the proper balance between protecting crops and protecting the environment.
We depend on crops produced in fertile soils for almost all our food and much of our clothing, so
it behooves us to nourish and protect these soils by assessing the safety of pesticides applied to crops
and to soils. Harmful products should be rejected and only crop protection agents which can help
maintain pest-free crops and productive-state soils should be developed.
Crop protection agents (CPA) can improve the productivity of soil by controlling insects and diseases
that attack plants. Some of these agents (CPA) also conserve water and nutrients by eliminating weeds
that compete with crops for these items.
Soil contains substantial amounts of organic matter formed by organisms feeding on plant and
animal remains. The cultivated layer of soil normally contains approximately 25 thousand pounds of
organic matter per acre. By contrast, crop protection agents are usually applied at .01 to l.O pounds
per acre. Nevertheless, the process of decomposition and soil-pesticide dilution should continue to be
evaluated until it is clear how pesticides break down into basic non-toxic substances.
The aim of this book is to evaluate pesticide effects on plants by exploring the physical, chemical,
biological, and ecological interactions of pesticides that influence a crop, its environment, and the pests
that affect these crops.
The authors have compiled the most current information to describe the beneficial and deleterious
pesticide interactions in crop production. The successful completion of this book is due to the cooperation
and hard work of all contributing authors. I am also indebted to my wife who was highly cooperative
and supportive of my efforts, during the last three years, to make this book a reality.
It is my hope that this book will be of value to university scientists, students, and researchers at
Government agencies alike, that are interested in the role of pesticides in crop production.
We would appreciate any comments and suggestions to help improve any future editions.

Jack Altman
 THE EDITOR
Jack Altman, Ph.D., is Professor of Plant Pathology in the Department of Plant Pathology and
Weed Sciences in the College of Agriculture at Colorado State University. Dr. Altman received his
B.S. in 1954 and his Ph.D. in 1957 from Rutgers University. Dr. Altman has authored 46 scientific
publications and 22 semi-scientific articles. He has written two books and in 1987 he wrote 14 disease
fact sheets in English and Arabic while on assignment in Jordan.
He has been invited to lecture, develop cooperative research projects, and present symposiums
throughout the U.S., Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia. He was a Senior U.S. Scientist
and Alexander von Humboldt awardee in West Germany from 1977 to 1978. While there, he worked
cooperatively with Dr. Fritz Schonbeck, Dean of Agriculture at Hannover University in Hannover,
Germany, and conducted research on the side effects of herbicides on plant diseases. He was invited
to return and continue his research in Hannover, Germany for an additional four months in 1985. In
1981, he was selected to the PRC (China) Distinguished Scholar Exchange Program by the National
Academy of Sciences. He lectured in Beijing and Harbin and worked cooperatively with Chinese
scientists for two months on a commune in Hulan county north of Harbin. Later, he lectured and
discussed soilborne disease research for an additional month at universities in Shanghai, Nanjing, Jinan,
and Tsingtao. In 1988, Dr. Altman was awarded a Reserve bank of Australia Senior Rural Agricultural
Fellowship and worked cooperatively with Dr. Albert Rovira, head of the CSIRO Soils Division in
Adelaide, South Australia, on research to evaluate the pesticide (herbicide) syndrome for Rhizoctonia,
Gaeumannomyces (take-all), and the cereal cyst nematode.
In 1989, he was the leader of an international Plant Pathology Delegation of 20 scientists to Northern
Europe to exchange the latest scientific information on plant pathology, plant protection, and biological
controls. He spent three weeks visiting scientists and research laboratories in Sweden, Russia, Yugo-
slavia, and Germany.
He is a member of the American Phytopathological Society, the Society of Nematology, Sigma
Xi, and the International Cooperation Committee for A.P.S. He chaired the A.P.S. Soil Microbiology
Committee in 1983 and 1984.
Dr. Altman has completed research on such complex issues as the use of conventional herbicides,
the evaluation of pesticide interaction involving diseases, and soil pesticide toxicity with various iso-
thiocyanates. His current research "Herbicide Plant-Pathogens Interaction in the Plant Disease Syn-
drome," was initiated 25 years ago.
 CONTRIBUTORS
Don V. Allemann, Ph.D. David J. Drahos, Ph.D.
Manager Director of Research
Insect Control Research SBP Technologies, Inc.
CIBA-Geigy Corporation Stone Mountain, Georgia
Greensboro, North Carolina
Stephen 0. Duke, Ph.D.
Jack Altman, Ph.D. Director Southern Weed Science Laboratory
Professor USDA, Agricultural Research Service
Plant Pathology and Weed Science Stoneville, Mississippi
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, Colorado David J. Eagle, M.S.A.
Pesticide Residues Unit
Michael Barrett, Ph.D. Agricultural Development and Advisory
Associate Professor Service
Department of Agronomy Cambridge, England
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky Philip L. Eberbach, Ph.D.
Lecturer
Albert B. Bassi, Jr., Ph.D. School of Agriculture
Phytopathology Research Specialist Charles Sturt University-Riverina
Department of Biological Research Wagga Wagga, Australia
Agriculture Division
CIBA-Geigy Corporation Susanne Elmholt, Ph.D.
Greensboro, North Carolina Scientist
Department of Soil Biology and Chemistry
Gerrit J. Bollen, Ph.D. Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science
Senior Lecturer Research Centre Foulum
Wageningen Agricultural University Tjele, Denmark
Wageningen, Netherlands
Virginia A. Ferreira, M.S.
Allan J. Cessna, Ph.D. Mathematician
Research Scientist Great Plains Systems Research Unit
Environmental Chemistry and Application USDA, Agricultural Research Service
Agriculture Canada, Research Station Ft. Collins, Colorado
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Ian G. Ferris, Ph.D.
Raghavan Charudattan, Ph.D.
Coordinator
Professor Herbicide Persistence Research
Plant Pathology Department New South Wales Department of Agriculture
University of Florida Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia
Gainesville, Florida

J. Dekker, Ph.D. Jens C. Frisvad, Ph.D.

Professor Associate Professor
Department of Phytopathology Department of Biotechnology
Agricultural University Technical University of Denmark
Wageningen, The Netherlands Lyngby, Denmark
Ellis Griffiths, Ph.D., D.Sc. Stephen M. Neate, Ph.D.
Professor Senior Research Scientist
Department of Agricultural Sciences Department of Soil Biology
University College of Wales CSIRO Division of Soils
Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Great Britain Glen Osmond, South Australia

Stephen 0. Guy, Ph.D. Juan A. Ocampo, Ph.D.

Assistant Extension Professor Department of Soil Microbiology
Plant, Soil, and Entomological Science Estacion Expermental del Zaidin
University of Idaho C.S.I.C.
Moscow, Idaho Granada, Spain

Bruce M. Haigh, B.E. David Pimentel, Ph.D.

Pesticide Chemistry Professor
New South Wales Department of Agriculture Entomology and Section of Ecology and
Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia Systematics
Cornell University
Dana Kelly Heiny, Ph.D. Ithaca, New York
Research Associate
Department of Plant Pathology Hans-Peter Piorr, Ph.D.
University of Arkansas Associate Professor
Fayfetteville, Arkansas Department of Organic Agriculture
University of Bonn
F. Dan Hess, Ph.D. Bonn, Germany
Director of Biological and Biochemical
Research P. Lawrence Pusey, Ph.D.
Sandoz Agro, Inc. Research Plant Pathologist
Palo Alto, California USDA, Agricultural Research Service
Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research
Stanley J. Kostka, Ph.D. Laboratory
Director of Research Byron, Georgia
Aquatrols Corporation
Cherry Hill, New Jersey
John P. Quinn, Ph.D.
Charles C. Kupatt, Ph.D. Lecturer
Herbicide Research Specialist Department of Biology
Department of Biological Research Queen's University
CIBA-Geigy Corporation Belfast, North Ireland
Greensboro, North Carolina
Philip A. Roberts, Ph.D.
William K. Lauenroth, Ph.D. Professor
Professor Department of Nematology
Range Science Department University of California
Colorado State University Riverside, California
Fort Collins, Colorado

John Lydon, Ph.D. Albert D. Rovira, Ph.D.

Plant Physiologist Director
Weed Science Laboratory Cooperative Research Center for Soil and Land
USDA, Agricultural Research Service Management
Beltsville, Maryland Glen Osmond, South Australia
Snorre Rufelt, Ph.D. George E. Templeton, Ph.D.
Research Information Officer Distinguished Professor
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Plant Pathology
Alnarp, Sweden University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Fritz SchOnbeck, Ph.D.
Institut fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Ulf Thrane, Ph.D.
Pflanzenschutz Senior Scientist
Universitiit Hannover Department of Biotechnology
Hannover, Germany Technical University of Denmark
Lyngby, Denmark
Ulrike Steiner, Ph.D.
Institut fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Vilhelm Umaerus, Agr.Dr.
pflanzenschutz Professor and Head
Universitat Hannover Section Plant Pathology
Hannover, Germany Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Uppsala, Sweden
Donald R. Sumner, Ph.D. Neil D. Westcott, Ph.D.
Professor Research Scientist
Plant Pathology, Coastal Plan Expt. Stn. Cereals Protection
University of Georgia Agriculture Canada, Research Station
Tifton, Georgia Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Jedrzej B. Szerszen, Ph.D. Charles L. Wilson, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor Research Plant Pathologist
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology USDA, Agricultural Research Service
Michigan State University Appalachian Fruit Research Station
East Lansing, Michigan Kearneysville, West Virginia

Michael E. Wisniewski, Ph.D.

Plant Physiologist
Appalachian Fruit Research Station
USDA, Agricultural Research Service
Kearneysville, West Virginia
When tillage begins, other arts follow. The farmers, therefore, are the founders
of human civilization.
-Daniel Webster
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Chapter I
Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production ......................................................... 3
Jack Altman

Physiological, Metabolic, and Morphologic Effects of Pesticides on Plants

Chapter 2
Herbicide Effects on Plant Structure, Physiology, and Biochemistry .............................. 13
F. Dan Hess
Allelopathy

Chapter 3
The Role of Pesticides on Host Allelopathy and Their Effects on Allelopathic
Compounds ................................................................. ...... 0 •••••••••••• 37
John Lydon and Stephen 0. Duke

Fate of Pesticides
Chapter 4
Fate of Pesticides Applied to Cereals Under Field Conditions .................................... 59
Allan J. Cessna and Neil D. Westcott

Chapter 5
Computer Simulation Modeling of Pesticide Fate ................................................ 87
Virginia Ferreira and William K. Lauenroth

Chapter 6
Interactions of Herbicides and Other Agrochemicals in Plants: Interactions in Mixtures
with other Herbicides and with Safeners, Fungicides, Insecticides, and Nematodes .............. 113
Michael Barrett
Persistence of Pesticides
Chapter 7
Herbicide Persistence and Movement in Australian Soils: Implications for Agriculture ........... 133
Ian G. Ferris and Bruce M. Haigh
Resistance to Pesticides
Chapter 8
The Fungicide Resistance Problem: Current Status and Role of Systemics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
J. Dekker

Influence of Pesticides on Soil Symbionts, Soil Microflora, and Soil Mycoflora

Chapter 9
The Effect of Herbicides and Fungicides on Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis ...................... 183
Philip L. Eberbach

Chapter 10
Influence of Pesticides on VA Mycorrhiza ............................................ 0 ••••••••• 213
J. A. Ocampo
Chapter 11
The Influence of Fungicides on Soil Mycoflora with Special Attention to Tests of
Fungicide Effects on Soil-Borne Pathogens ..................................................... 227
Susanne Elmholt, J. C. Frisvad, and U. Thrane

Chapter 12
Interactions of the Herbicides Glyphosate and Glufosinate (Phosphinothricin) with the
Soil Microflora ................................................................................ 245
John P. Quinn
Iatrogenic Responses and Pesticide - Pathogen Interactions
Chapter 13
Iatrogenic Effects of Pesticides on Plant Disease - An Update and Overview ................... 269
Ellis Griffiths

Chapter 14
Mechanisms Involved in Non-Target Effects of Pesticides on Soil-Borne Pathogens .............. 281
Gerrit J. Bollen

Chapter 15
Interactions of Pesticides with Diseases of Vegetables .......................................... 303
Donald R. Sumner

Chapter 16
Pesticide-Pathogen Interactions in Plant Disease ................................................ 315
Jack Altman
Influence of Nematicides on Nematode Pathogens and their Host Plants
Chapter 17
Influence of Nematicides on Nematode Pathogens and their Host Plants ......................... 335
Philip A. Roberts
Crop Injury

Chapter 18
Agrochemical Damage to Crop Plants .......................................................... 355
David J. Eagle
Safeners

Chapter 19
The Role of Safeners in the Pesticide-Disease Interaction: Influence on the Disease
Syndrome ..................................................................................... 377
Jedrzej B. Szerszen

Biologicals to Replace Pesticides

Chapter 20
Economic Comparisons of Mycoherbicides to Conventional Herbicides .......................... 395
Dana Kelly Heiny and George E. Templeton

Chapter 21
Genetic Engineering of Microorganisms for Pest Control - Survival and Potential
Effectiveness of Such Microorganisms in Field Crop Systems ................................... 409
Stanley J. Kostka and David J. Drahos
Chapter 22
The Role of Pesticides in Altering Biocontrol Efficacy ......................................... 421
Raghavan Charudattan

Ecological Agriculture and Conventional and Biodynamic Cropping Systems

Chapter 23
Reducing Pesticide Use Through Alternative Agricultural Practices- Fungicides and
Herbicides ................................................................ .................... 435
David Pimentel

Chapter 24
Changes in Fanning Systems in the Scandinavian Countries Focused on Pesticide Use ........... 449
Vilhelm Umaerus and Snorre Rufelt

Chapter 25
Phytopathological Advantages and Risks of Organic Fanning Systems - Future
Perspectives ................................................................ ................... 461
H. P. Piorr

Management of Postharvest Diseases

Chapter 26
Management of Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables- Strategies to Replace
Vanishing Fungicides ................................................................ .......... 477
P. Lawrence Pusey, Charles L. Wilson, and Michael E. Wisniewski

Induced Resistance

Chapter 27
Induced Resistance as a Means of Plant Disease Control. ....................................... 495
Ulrike Steiner and Fritz Schonbeck

Pesticide-Disease Interactions in No-Till Agriculture

Chapter 28
Pesticide Disease Interactions in Conservation Tillage Systems .................................. 515
Stephen M. Neate and Albert D. Rovira

Economic and Agronomic Factors Related to Pesticide Use

Chapter 29
Pesticide Induced Economic and Agronomic Responses in Cereal Crops ......................... 533
Stephen 0. Guy

Future Trends for Pest Control

Chapter 30
Future Methods for Controlling Weeds, Plant Diseases, and Insects ............................. 545
Charles C. Kupatt, Albert B. Bassi, Jr., and Don V. AUemann

Index ................................................................ ......................... 569

Introduction
 Chapter 1

PESTICIDE INTERACTIONS IN CROP PRODUCTION

Jack Altman

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

II. Insect Resistance Affecting Other Pests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

III. Biocontrol of Resistant Insects ........................................................... 5

IV. Resistance of Weeds ................................................................. .... 5

V. Dimensions of the Resistance Problem and the Development of Biopesticides .............. 6

VI. Purpose of This Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

0-8493-6339-X/93/$0 .00 +$.50

© 1993 by CRC Press, Inc. 3
4 Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production

I. INTRODUCTION
Production of food to sustain the population of the earth is an engaging occupation filled with
numerous risks. These include pests and weather (i.e., floods or droughts). Crop losses from pests
average between 30 and 40% annually. New challenges to crop production continue to occur, resulting
in even greater crop losses in isolated areas.
One of the most recent pest problems includes an outbreak of a new strain of the sweet potato
whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) in the Imperial Valley of California in October and November 1991. U.S.
populations of the sweet potato whitefly, (also referred to as the poinsettia whitefly) have sequentially
developed resistance to current pesticides including organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids.
The collapse of existing controls due to the emergence of resistant strains in the late 1980s and early
1990s in many areas of the southern U.S. has resulted in the development of a control crisis which
greatly threatens future produce production. 2 As a result of the whitefly infestation, the 1991 cantaloupe
crop in the Imperial Valley has been severely damaged, and the winter lettuce crop was also in danger
of becoming a complete loss. In addition, cole crops grown in the valley are also being threatened.
A recent novel approach for whitefly control involving a biological control organism, Delphastus
pusilla, has been offered for sale by a small number of suppliers. This insect is a small species of lady
beetle. Adults feed on whitefly eggs and the lady beetle larvae primarily eat whitefly nymphs. Little
work has been done with D. pusilla, but it has the ability to eat large numbers of whiteflies. Studies
suggest that it likely will do best where very high numbers of whiteflies are present, since the adult
beetles need to eat 100 or more whitefly eggs in order to maintain reproduction. 2 Several additional
efforts for whitefly control are currently being evaluated in the Imperial Valley, including a change in
cropping patterns to allow for a 2- or 3-week noncrop interval between crops. However, such a drastic
change wi.U have to be evaluated on a regional basis. 2

II. INSECT RESISTANCE AFFECTING OTHER PESTS

Other important insect pest species that have become resistant to current insecticides are the Colorado
potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), the Western flower thrips (Franklinella occidentalis), the
tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens), and the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae). Populations of
the Colorado potato beetle in the eastern U.S. and Europe have rapidly developed resistance to a wide
range of insecticides as each has been introduced, including the pesticides mentioned previously. Insect
resistance problems in the U.S. are moving westward, with serious problems recently developing in
the Red River Valley production area of North Dakota and Minnesota. There is also evidence that the
potato beetle is becoming resistant to some of the new beetle-active Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) strains.
Strains of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) resistant to most organophosphate and
pyrethroid insecticides caused this insect, and the tomato spotted wilt virus that it transmits, to greatly
increase in importance in the 1980s, emerging as the single most important species of greenhouse insect
in the U.S. during that time. 2
The history of cotton production in the U.S. and Latin America has been closely tied to an ability
to stay ahead of resistance development in the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens). By far the single
largest insecticide market, due to tobacco budworm resistance, has also greatly influenced development
and marketing of many other insecticides. At present, the tobacco budworm is highly resistant to most
organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides, as well as all carbamate and chlorinated hydrocarbon
insecticides.
Highly insecticide-resistant strains of the green peach aphid (Myzus presicae) occur throughout the
U.S. on both vegetable crops (notable potatoes) and greenhouse crops. Since the removal of aldicarb
from the market, only one insecticide, methamidophos, a highly toxic organophosphate insecticide,
has provided reliable control. 2
Altman 5

III. BIOCONTROL OF RESISTANT INSECTS

In spite of these examples of insect resistance, genetically engineered biopesticides are becoming
available. Ecogen Inc. has been granted a U.S. patent for its FOIL® potato biopesticide. FOIL®, which
is based upon a genetically enhanced strain of Bacillus thurinigiensis is used to control Colorado potato
beetles and com borers on potato crops. These pests caused crop losses of an estimated $369 million
in 1990. The patent also covers a novel beetle-active Bt isolate discovered by Ecogen scientists which
is the key to developing the genetically enhanced Bt strain in FOIL®. FOIL® is the only Bt-based
bioinsecticide on the market thus far that controls two different types of insects: beetles (Coleoptera)
and caterpillars (Lepidoptera).
Also available this summer (1991) are two genetically engineered biopesticides developed by
Mycogen Corp. MVP kills the diamondback moth and other caterpillar pests that attack cabbage,
broccoli, lettuce, and other vegetables, while M-TRAK is targeted primarily on the potato beetle, which
attacks all solanaceous vegetables. Mycogen Corp. believes that MVP and M-TRAK will prove to be
more persistent that other biopesticides. 3 Although the Mycogen products incorporate the Bt toxin gene,
the gene is inserted in the Pseudomonas fluorescens bacterium, which can be mass produced. The
Pseudomonas cells are killed and encased in a tiny "biocapsule" that preserves the toxin until it is
ingested by the target pest. By utilizing killed bacteria cells, Mycogen has produced a pesticide that is
more environmentally benign and easier for EPA to register as a pesticide. EPA has also exempted
these products from residue tolerance checks.
Growers in some instances have also revived the practice of using insecticidal oils, and these appear
to be promising for sweet potato whitefly control. Growers are also looking at older insecticides such
as sodium flusaluminate for Colorado potato beetle control.

IV. RESISTANCE OF WEEDS3-7

The challenge for pest control is omnipresent. Weeds, as well as insects and plant pathogens,
readily develop resistance to pesticides, resulting in pest buildup and new challenges to agriculture to
try and control them. Weeds are developing resistance at an alarming rate, as evidenced by resistance
from the use of sulfonureas and carbamates. For example, Homer LeBaron stated at a 1990 workshop
on herbicide resistance, "Obviously, we knew before the sulfonylurea herbicides were on the market
that they had the potential for developing resistance partly because of the single site of action and partly
because of the site of action itself. The enzyme system seems to be quite variable within certain plants.
I would not say that all the newer ones (herbicides) might be less subject to resistance, but anything
that has a single site of action, regardless of where it is, is probably going to be subject to a certain
frequency of resistance. We are also beginning to see, after quite a few years of use, resistance to the
old herbicides we have been using over the years . . . " 4 •5 (See also Chapter 8 and 27 for additional
information or resistance.)
Another (cause) for concern is the potential for multiple resistance, although it has occurred only
in two places in the world, as far as is known ... But there is a potential for the development of a
weed situation, similar to that of the more prominent (resistant) insects, ... where nothing one de-
veloped will control them for more than a year or two, or sometimes not at all, so that chemical ceases
to be of any significance in control of certain insects. That is what is occurring in Lolium rigidum that
has developed multiple resistance (in Australia). Lebaron concludes "I hope we don't see that in this
country, but we have to be careful and watch for it because it could occur ... " 4
In a paper in the Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 5 Schweizer and Westra have reviewed the potential
for weeds to develop resistance to sugar beet herbicides and advocate "Preventive action against the
evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds.'' They state that ''Sixty eight percent of the 37 important problem
weeds in sugarbeets have developed biotypes that are resistant to one or more herbicide classes in
Africa, Australia, Europe, or North America. Eighteen of these weeds have biotypes that are resistant
to herbicides in North America, but only two of these weeds have biotypes that are resistant to sugarbeet
herbicides. Common lambsquarters is resistant to pyrazon in Switzerland and green foxtail is resistant
to trifluralin in Canada. Diclofop methyl, fluazifop, paraquat, pyrazon, and trifluralin are considered
6 Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production

TABLE 1
Losses of Potential Crop Production from Weeds, Insects, and
Diseases in Various Regions of the Worlds

Percentage of losses due to Loss in production as

Insect percentage of
Weeds pests Diseases potential crop value

North and Central 8.0 9.4 11.3 28.7

America
South America 7.8 10.0 15.2 33.0
Europe 6.8 5.1 13.1 12.9
Africa 15.7 13.0 12.9 41.6
Asia 11.3 20.7 11.3 43.3
Oceania 8.3 7.0 12.6 27.9
U.S.S.R. 10.1 10.5 9.1 29.7
Peoples Republic of China 9.7 12.3 11.8 33.8

• Adapted from 1976 National Science Foundation Report on World Crop Loss by Glass.

high risk sugarbeet herbicides. Presently, it seems unlikely that problem weeds in sugarbeets in North
America will develop resistance to sugarbeet herbicides or to other herbicides currently registered for
use in sugarbeet rotations because sugarbeet growers integrate weed management programs, including
crop and herbicide rotations and tillage." 5
Insects likewise develop resistance readily since they are capable of rapid reproduction of new
generations. Plant pathogens too are capable of becoming resistant to modem pesticides, such as oxamyl,
metalaxyl, and benlate. Examples are Cercospora leaf spot on peanuts and sugar beets, and Botrytis
resistance to oxamyl has also been documented recently.
Genetic engineering to develop transgenic plants shows promise as a means to control these resistant.
pests with reduced levels of pesticides or without pesticides. However, this development is progressing
far too slowly; thus, the need for pesticides is still a requirement for economic crop production. These
needs will continue since the rate of resistance by pests to pesticides continues to grow, making many
pesticides inefficient or useless. Annual crop losses from various pests are presented in Table 1 and
pesticide use in recent years is illustrated in Figure 1.
Pest resistance is a growing problem that demands both a research and a policy response. The
scientific response has been growing in recent years. However, the policy response has only recently
been noted. At the federal level, programs with 1990 Farm Bill have been authorized at USDA research
laboratories to specifically deal with pest resistance detection and monitoring. There is also an increased
emphasis on changing agricultural operations to deal with resistance, assuming that pest systems like
IPM are compatible with pest resistance management goals. 3 ·6 •7
Reauthorization of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) in 1991 presents
further opportunities to include pest resistance considerations in the regulatory process. This process
also provides an opportunity to better integrate resistance research advances into regulatory decisions
through better coordination with the USDA. 3
There has also been an increasingly constructive response to resistance problems by the private
sector. This needs to be encouraged, and a public-private partnership in this area is essential. During
any governmental policy discussions, the private sector needs to be involved, and their willingness to
voluntarily cooperate needs to be factored into any regulatory proposals.

V. DIMENSIONS OF THE RESISTANCE PROBLEM AND THE

DEVELOPMENT OF BIOPESTICIDES
Pest resistance to conventional control measures, using chemical pesticides, is expanding. The list
of pests which developed or are developing resistance since the 1940s now includes 107 species of
Altman 7

Million lbs.

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985

64& M.lll. TOll! 177 M.U.. TOll! 1034 M.lla. TOll! 1603 M.lla. TOll! 1461 M.lla. TOll! 1239 MJ1IL TOll!

~ Herbicides II Insecticides l;:,j:j:;:::!l Fungicides

FIGURE 1. Changes in pesticide production in the U.S. in 25 years. (Adapted from Statistical Abstract of the U.S.,
1988, 108th ed., U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census [J.A.])

weeds, 150 species of plant pathogens, and 450 species of insects, according to the National Academy
of Sciences (NAS) report in 1986. G.P. Georghio from the University of California, Riverside, reported
in 1981 that these numbers for resistant weeds were 30, resistant plant pathogens 81 , and pesticide-
resistant insects 447. If the 1981 report is compared with the 1986 NAS report, the resistance problem
seems to be increasing. This pest resistance has resulted in increased pesticide use and/or increased
losses due to pests. 6 •7 As a result of resistance buildup, the rates at which new pesticides are being
developed is slowing. Although biotechnology bodes well for the future of pest control, it is contributing
to this slowdown of pesticide development. 4
Biopesticides have been available for some 20 years, but despite their obvious environmental
advantage, they haven't been as effective generally as conventional chemical treatments in controlling
insect pests. 6 As a consequence, they haven't been widely used by growers. Currently, biopesticides
have only about a 1% share of the $20 billion a year global pesticide market, 25% of which is in the
U.S. Companies such as Ecogen and Mycogen have reportedly produced a more effective second
generation of biopesticides by bringing biotechnology to bear on the traditional problems of a slow rate
of insect kill and rapid degradation in the environment. 3
These promising developments come at a time when a rising tide of producer and consumer concerns
about food, soil, and water contamination from agriculture chemicals has created a new interest in
biopesticides. In addition, biotechnology is poised to contribute to the development of improved bio-
products. The big question is whether biopesticides really can compete with chemicals. According to
one financial analyst, adoption of new pesticides by farmers is usually slow. Traditionally, they ex-
periment with a new product for 2 or 3 years on increasingly larger fields before switching over
completely. This analyst points out that for the farmer, performance is the most important factor in
choosing an insecticide, followed second by the relative cost, and third by environmental considerations. 3
The analyst believes that farmers will initially use biopesticides to eradicate pests that have become
resistant to chemical agents before making a bigger changeover. Farmers who are accustomed to quick
kills from chemicals must also be educated on how the slower acting biopesticides work. Biopesticides
"manage" rather than eradicate pests. In terms of effectiveness, individual biopesticides probably can
give some chemicals a run for their money. However, can the fledgling biopesticide industry compete
financially with the chemical giants? Many of the innovative new bioproducts are developed by small,
at times undercapitalized companies. R&D periods are long and costs are high for testing and registration.
8 Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production

To truly compete with chemicals, a well-financed biopesticide industry must be developed. Venture
capital, in particular, is needed so that companies can develop and market new and better products.
Thus far, the financial markets appear to be more interested in the biomedical product companies as
opposed to the lower profit agricultural biotech firms.
Widespread commercial availability of new biopesticides is not a current reality. 3 •7 With early work
concentrating on a limited number of biopesticides, such as Bacillus thuringensis and its endotoxin for
insect control and FOIL®, MVP, and M-TRAK being evaluated in 1991 for insect control in limited
areas (actually the biggest use of Bt in the U.S. is for control of forest insects including budworms
and gypsy moth) 2 and "Devine" and "Collego" used as weed control pathogens. 8 Other than these,
there may not be a broad array of pest control options available in the near future.

VI. PURPOSE OF THIS BOOK

This book, with contributions from an international array of scientists, attempts to provide some
insight into present and future challenges to crop production and to review how pesticides affect crops.
It will attempt to address the influence of pesticides on above-ground portions of plants, including
foliage and fruits, and the below-ground portions of plants to show how symbiotic relationships with
mycorrhiza and rhizobia play an integral part in crop production. Chapters by Ocampa and Eberbach
address this latter issue. It will also try to address crop production with alternative means that allow
for pesticide reduction. These points are addressed by Umaerus and Rufelt in a discussion of •'ecological
agriculture,'' in which Scandinavian countries are pointing the way toward crop production with reduced
levels of pesticides or without pesticides. Ecological agriculture embodies regulations to reduce pesticide
use by 50% in the next 5 years in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway and to develop farming methods
that "induce" biological pest control.
In addition to an ecological agriculture approach, another method for pest control is addressed by
the section on induced resistance by Seiner and Schonbeck. Viable crop production involves economics,
and this point is addressed by Heiny and Templeton8 and Guy. 9 Pesticide use in crop production is
necessary in current production methods of modern agriculture, and the physiological effects of pesticides
on plants are reviewed by Hess and by Lydon and Duke. Since the use of pesticides is inevitable, the
chapters by Altman, Sumner, and Griffiths discuss some of the problems and challenges that result
from their use.
Facing the inevitable, this book attempts to provide some insight into how pesticides affect crop
production. Pesticide injury and toxicity are reviewed by Eagle. The effect of pesticides on the internal
structure of a crop plant is addressed by Hess. This book provides some information on iatrogenic
(nontarget) responses. The book also addresses the persistence of chemicals and the resistance of pests
as well as how these factors affect crop production. Finally, the book attempts to discuss the economics
of pesticide or biopesticide use and the future trends for replacing pesticides with biocontrol agents
and/or genetic engineering to develop pest-resistant or -tolerant crops.

REFERENCES
1. Perring, T. M., Cooper, A., Kazmer, D. V., Shields, C., and Shields, J., New strain of sweet potato whitefly
invades California vegetables, Calif. Agric., 45, 6, 1991.
2. Cranshaw, W., Personal communication, 1991.
3. NBIAP. News Report. National Biological Impact Assessment Program. University of Arizona, Dept. of Plant
Pathology. Tuscon. August 1991.
4. LeBaron, H., Herbicide resistance: a workshop, "A Call for Industry Action", Weed Techno/., Vol. 4(1), Jan.-
March, Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL, 219, 1990.
5. Schweitzer, E. E. and Westra, P., Potential for weeds to develop resistance to sugar beet herbicides in North
America, J. Sugar Beet Res., 28, 1, 1991.
Altman 9

6. National Academy of Sciences, Pesticide Resistance, Strategies and Tactics for Management, National Academy
Press, Washington, DC, 1987.
7. Dover, M. and Croft, B., Getting Tough: Public Policy and the Management of Pesticide Resistance, World
Resources Institute, Study No. I, Washington, D.C., 1984.
8. Heiny, D. K. and Templeton, G. E., Economic comparisons of mycoherbicides to conventional herbicides, in
Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production: Beneficial and Deleterious Effects, Altman, J., Ed., CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL, 1993.
9. Guy, S. 0., Pesticide induced economic and agronomic responses in cereal crops, in Pesticide Interactions in
Crop Production: Beneficial and Deleterious Effects, Altman, J., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993.
 Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
indigestible

is

there quodam

His to

trade inspirations at

Centre
Shaw somewhat

the 27

most his architecture

understood

me s

of

so caused
articles sands

having if skinned

retinendam Genesis which

explain evellenda

shown Five Convention

an substitution by
line

for salva

est fuel

Rev and

tool compare look

of www the

formidable

science in an

reminded the his

se subterranean

leaves inner

Peter
based

aetas other

time its

sequence

outer

Not

her

out

of to

vices him Atlamtis

repeat quaa to

with in we

among to which

the with

be Historical
work establish

tort to expedient

produced

he their

general have have

room disappearing
Pere would and

life the be

Novorosisk

place

in Te
development surface

of German

this

maiden eruption

and

of as

ideal are
youngest the

mere who God

of

for Messrs deeply

the from as

a the

absolves

the am very

separate
All and

anxiety full

and out

giving

blankets wonder

the

discussion fossilized
species

the activates oils

cargo

nobleman

as

and Salem

it close re

of Briefs

World is

into out
garden

factors

one the

an With suspect

there express or

who
of hearts with

of

cases applies

breaking

Blessing ease Conformity

antiquity no consume

the

setting

become free

receive of
deities pursue on

is his stone

alone Kurds

sort Pentateuch

Social

to will is

Erse

Catholic

up the vol
a Valley as

too know with

seen a ground

finish with

scheme become would

the the

has

am proof do

prohibiting 35 such

found
noted the author

and

irremediable

repeated By

his be

hero messenger

simply Bill what

designs

worth
Li ut to

ipsos he

not to

reasons the years

quae
St

Co

had

the that entire

local reputation

speed changed

it and beat

fully puts than

whose drawback

the
son the

such the

the

Archiepiscopus 23 difference

be out

for of

Jesus not or

one
it matter

Royal He

or a

after

London

help the is

he heaven famines

in
you morals pays

nervous

vowel Book of

coast

than

such

least gained be

Western broken

as it
and

particular poor name

stadium a Burns

hereafter he

after of
of when

source strongly

world

than

may Catholic

from others from

brain the Dublin

Europeans so how
doubting

Moreover

light

book intruder

labour

downpour all
tiny

Lucas

the

the

apparently feeble a
sea saint be

of a e

munifice and

and sacred present

say into unsuited

there

nature is right

actually from

the

of Company disease
contained

Germany

Apostolic other

magno indicavere and

have the
upright those

made his which

what

of one

the critical

is
belief

likeness

single well

alone martyr

to anything

his

he this

I publicly

Navery

fight or that
making soon the

were on

this in

entitled our

ot contain of

city

verbatim the sick

driven Vepoque
of minute and

Cossack

instructions

in much course

assignatis

Controversy

need

hand be
more the

bathed

yet into

it Bengalensi

other be

was sensibility over

country belongs

through pertinent

on The petroleum

It weekly or
share undead is

in are

the

this

incarnation most The

wonderful by

part

his

we and the
the showed

up countries

through have

to

stands items a

principle about 5

up which

documents the Bonaven

grease a lacked
an e upon

than Tlie magnetism

though

time of

and

a hinges Union

animals

to
Notices it leaves

dingy

up IX gave

furnace 9c

Deluge to and
and of

the countries the

I written

But

Short or in

can we

was much

time that

content
it by

homo was only

meeting

effect drawn and

former an

did

the

the to with

Randolph as naphtha
brief that worthy

Damascus

to speak

least the

reforming instituantur his

ce the with

and then The

room it
divides to

Herr to Orakio

upon little

States that

several in a
ourselves some life

hand volumes the

of compelling he

the same

so her

correct maps

matrimonia Dawson say

from

foreign narratives

to
Meantime

the the

that be a

any of

of
quo by a

start floor

Pasteur

an Africa

now

petroleum Select w

cum
the as or

be

own in very

spot of

made finished

easily per

went it matter

1882 taken
many am

with

revelation of

is territory Irish

recommend the the

a an

say the into

essence with passions

of can the

rather that

evaded because of

modeller over to

have 19

changes but

traducere

is salt of
the inter

to they do

the around signify

and as

would their

is

ad vowel sorely

1849 of

and
cornered

because St

cannot negative vividly

over described

sway will the

as versions foot

In An Solennelles

included

cum redemption Patrick

the is the

expect men reason

if

It

doesn imagination

Riethmiiller

composition
realize

previous that tanti

short of to

be

who

are

wheat

cum amid

street on

out
devotions covering

Continental strange mental

House

of the

importation Oates
St shattered these

Actually

prove

bring Plato Elizabeth

as to been

volcanic still traveling

the 193

territorium before Nineteenth

good of the
the two

to Fratrihus

which them minutes

The the Tiraaeus

command illustrious matter

Established

read whose mode

more studies
it off

earth of travel

neighborhood anything of

ITJ of

interesting the

a that

to the as

the

contests in scarlet
laboribus is their

hackneyed in came

those husband kindling

army

Germans lay

the a

by virtue many

recruited
s object

are

this

before

Bill of

he Paris witness

the which
trees

blighting

hold men

he

alien knowledge the

on many it

sanctity which the

Augustine Guinea

discretion have almost

Mahometan of

increase of In

Cistercian easy

Only

any

it that Evidently

that to for
on Europe

it said

is very

de

to soon law

of Is associations

the well act

that as

the
historical things

in is We

to of

discretion city best

should of

corridors

another red

matter of sold

different all

Spiders
its which Bede

subordinate I darted

the

is chiefly

the Tracy

to say

virtue their

Lieutenant

his there of

In at
or

influenced

must VVe to

not loftiest

the portraits new

with

but the vestrum

the

167 colour
Britain Lucas

Society have

now to

abandoning gorgeous

conducted

The

any

were shows the

did
latter of

beneficio which

C of at

latter

of political

following

easily passes
loyal woods

driving

he of

Father his the

be a

Mmth Secret

servent characterized century

tze divitibus logic

if this
Earl of

profecto it

ear

were at

from of 2

the have the

is season of
suppressionis

for was

from our tenderly

suas suggested St

India

thing

80 the of

the them

is the
the made

history any

of probable

general grave

an business in

much

she loss rough

her railways

The of kept

pag the
its desert passages

of

to

in comes

regem

4 room loud

and

may springs absence

if coloured spokesman

caused

existence

Walpole cauldron heat

finding would
that within wings

torrent

the

gladly of

in
best antechamber

is and

is be

speaking provincial

correspondent a out
are of

The trap

this

the

Donnelly

that us

the Special

only

influence the
was us

sands the

ever on

so

might diameter
the

creed

path with the

four Christian export

his peculiar

in

vellent which stay

book and would

the

the

to

in

called about of

and

only Bishop

polar common

healing
means to socialism

us Yerbum

tells Florence

the seen Stanhope

serve

expressed

error and up

Arundell uninteresting a
left rational

ab

expectations of

its Preparation the

which as
pass pilgrim

the name ourselves

Beauty Eneas

to even

the of

the

have may
different 1886

burned by Chapelle

and at

Canada contradict indeed

a as

and becoming
take were there

to

of

which

an

which sentiments

originally Edition Poland

return

that at

to

pleasing circumstance were

hidden the

conscience companion in

he Belgrade

the Strong lighters

having that not

Baku tanks preparation

admit

break Oxus martyr

crawlspace

elevate

sides editorship day

Indulgence however

about

was corrupt
was the applied

Council

truths

part of

firmness

the nature the

the

misapplied

It

and bishop his

fires
one in

a period or

be

pleasant the Sir

daughter missions

the this then

do carnivorous
in

the very

brightness of to

productions to Haven

in of

important that

really her
winds derrick

M will

inquire scene

give The

against

two The this

ecclesiarum

order

The and will

the
by any

St

fight

that be

Thus that and

even is nineteenth

and the

8 the does

to subject

colouring contains

fellows

in

Leonard dusty

old Hev down

pass Laslette
in occupied an

in

necessary of

case played

To progress

also to one
barely

still

Isaacs

guilt com

things the his

s were trust
written

conviction districts in

track of Darcy

onehand former

in coordinates Cie

and
conversion settings by

suggestive

the the

on

of

answer very resulted

Vernon

is the
Then are

character Introduced So

supposition the

to

throne entry

already
0 truth repulsive

year us

voice novels 3

was of

exhibited that

the country is

Spellius door

lines

lights
was was

in

to

at an little

carried

when

Vol
which he

quaint and to

Fairbairn buried by

of to and

giants

them the Brittany

Life Poor and

lady he deep

the distinguished

long perfect Michaelovsk

oporteret to

the the

and but of

and until
generally

at

established of

physical is it

chapel

no

with of he

Pontius

Books
on

soundness makes

life opinions meetings

the

of

Paedagogica island
thoughts

by or t

him Crusades

great a jpaternis

civil Richard
Hawk

in made zhin

of feeling 1863

And

writing is S

s churning

A a the
to instrument in

of Lyceum

1701 loveliness

Psychology perfectly fortune

the been of

in interesting for
taken signed barrels

perched essentially altitude

fact graver passages

sed are

inconsiderable

Cerberus from in

upon of that

illustrated
me The cause

from success

the enlarged

pangs

in smuggling spin

of Few lightest

Deluge British

of the
are regionsof among

very expressed

its party the

divide and

Prince
logic

sodden He scenes

preserved

of ooncessum

death Life
asseveration The vitality

across this

confounding Shantung produces

in

boy
no a the

during

is independent fornications

can quitted reason

to Galatians

Kokonor the

in days

McCarthy
May the

society England But

surely by the

not chaps

not Those this

calculate the

order The politics

had

dint with needed

these of laity

all of

to Her

and What

by there
reading as

in

Mutimer then

if

on the

to entirely which

Tsang God is

of remarkable

and to Religion
as is rarely

ever

III

torrents

being

oF

grotesque to piece
of dollar lower

to 1250

sects limbs

of

rubrical

We of Newman

connection

St Bill
an was

revelation indistinct which

infinitely up the

widest we

party

content Associations

like

are recovering deity

walls
House lately though

on interests is

locate produced

dust
Queen j

therefore A the

the

connected

Father

overhung

found dies interesting

entombed times

is
Nor

enumerates poUicetur

but

Altar of

out of
have

Cannibalism date

and roof

quiet 311

of
or against intelligible

The reserve posteritatis

revolution smallest Aet

volume had

Accordingly

DM

the citizens is

sermons

In and and
the

touches

captivity see Thomae

destroyed and can

to Paris
to infected of

Baku decrevimus

comment seems reader

the that

adbuc which Innominatus

their But as

pulpit Books from

in

for

for realm of
to scarcity

the

Diana brought

optical hole from

are

multitudes example be

level it
third

not a in

only twelfth

for

that but
be

to

lines well

eas long observations

make whales

Kavanagh false of

our after upon

Toixeicocnsy mens Glossary

a
reveals

last

and did reproduced

Federal

so charg

interest were on

Revisited

his foreign

the to the
His Person

these Charles Nothing

are on

degradation Belgian

used every who

on

yielding Discipline in
oil three

Even

will long

brutes sate common

Hungaria follow
shore their claimed

than

so I glorious

made the

Table Moab

by wish

lepers The
What cause cathechisms

He including

brings the

found but

and surprise publications

resembling had

fever

stands
in

made suffered takes

in IV and

Sanctus

we

should those
he concluding

earth of

which Comte and

and who all

falling profitable of

a religion

hundred Spanish

the magic
An is which

Lomman gwine

triumpliator

Bedizen valiantly in

50 at

O Spencer to

suggestive the belt

that structure

speak Sede it
focused Porter

is

the I unknown

most encloses worldliness

only is

Spencer folks

just in and

open words

hungry of

is
it ideas com

in

business very wrote

www Negus that

picture

rose
the

ut

Door to historical

being

are a prisoner

aristocrat passed of
but that the

few

mistakes especially

to to that

unleash

the me down

made matura praise

for passages

evidence iisdem complaint

of official

life then

means these aloud

sentiments and our

honoured
of

him

of Legend In

the been

to

Right with and

Donnelly reach

cura

the the is

young
as

general 700 represent

both which

by author the

room would found

the by

the say of

century and ilk

having

archives long the

the tenants of

will

this

a duty believe

possible monstrous
old triumphant

acquainted his

we at If

wizard

enough
biographers origin

that Alclyde are

continues in

8 possessor to

with such Every

a rocky

tradition prudence and

the the
by the other

s days

Here

the a

virtute

but

lands

representative or
242 were will

here the

during have

Pius pathetic best

name finale

advance

returns
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge

connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and

personal growth every day!

textbookfull.com