0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views137 pages

Mohammed S Koran Why Muslims Kill For Islam Peter Mcloughlin Online PDF

The document promotes the book 'Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill for Islam' by Peter McLoughlin, which argues that Islam is fundamentally a religion of war rather than peace. It claims that misconceptions about Islam have been perpetuated by politicians and media, leading to public confusion about the nature of the religion. The book aims to present the Koran in a chronological format to reveal its violent commands and the historical context of Islamic teachings.

Uploaded by

leamicae3672
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views137 pages

Mohammed S Koran Why Muslims Kill For Islam Peter Mcloughlin Online PDF

The document promotes the book 'Mohammed's Koran: Why Muslims Kill for Islam' by Peter McLoughlin, which argues that Islam is fundamentally a religion of war rather than peace. It claims that misconceptions about Islam have been perpetuated by politicians and media, leading to public confusion about the nature of the religion. The book aims to present the Koran in a chronological format to reveal its violent commands and the historical context of Islamic teachings.

Uploaded by

leamicae3672
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 137

Mohammed s Koran Why Muslims Kill for Islam Peter

Mcloughlin latest pdf 2025

Now on sale at ebookname.com


( 4.5/5.0 ★ | 257 downloads )

https://ebookname.com/product/mohammed-s-koran-why-muslims-kill-for-
islam-peter-mcloughlin/
Mohammed s Koran Why Muslims Kill for Islam Peter Mcloughlin

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library


Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) available
Download now and explore formats that suit you...

Suicidal Mass Murderers A Criminological Study of Why They


Kill 1st Edition John Liebert

https://ebookname.com/product/suicidal-mass-murderers-a-
criminological-study-of-why-they-kill-1st-edition-john-liebert/

ebookname.com

First Kill Your Family Child Soldiers of Uganda and the


Lord s Resistance Army 1st Edition Peter H. Eichstaedt

https://ebookname.com/product/first-kill-your-family-child-soldiers-
of-uganda-and-the-lord-s-resistance-army-1st-edition-peter-h-
eichstaedt/
ebookname.com

The Modernist party 1st Edition Mcloughlin

https://ebookname.com/product/the-modernist-party-1st-edition-
mcloughlin/

ebookname.com

The Investor s Toolbox How to Use Spread Betting CFDs


Options Warrants and Trackers to Boost Returns and Reduce
Risk 2nd Edition Peter Temple
https://ebookname.com/product/the-investor-s-toolbox-how-to-use-
spread-betting-cfds-options-warrants-and-trackers-to-boost-returns-
and-reduce-risk-2nd-edition-peter-temple/
ebookname.com
Companion to the Roman Army Blackwell Companions to the
Ancient World 1st Edition Paul Erdkamp

https://ebookname.com/product/companion-to-the-roman-army-blackwell-
companions-to-the-ancient-world-1st-edition-paul-erdkamp/

ebookname.com

White Lies About the Inuit Teaching Culture UTP


Ethnographies for the Classroom 2nd Edition John Steckley

https://ebookname.com/product/white-lies-about-the-inuit-teaching-
culture-utp-ethnographies-for-the-classroom-2nd-edition-john-steckley/

ebookname.com

Routledge Handbook on the Global History of Nursing NIP


1st Edition Patricia D'Antonio

https://ebookname.com/product/routledge-handbook-on-the-global-
history-of-nursing-nip-1st-edition-patricia-dantonio/

ebookname.com

The 1 Million Reason to Change Your Mind 1st Edition Pat


Mesiti

https://ebookname.com/product/the-1-million-reason-to-change-your-
mind-1st-edition-pat-mesiti/

ebookname.com

Advances in Statistical Monitoring of Complex Multivariate


Processes With Applications in Industrial Process Control
1st Edition Uwe Kruger
https://ebookname.com/product/advances-in-statistical-monitoring-of-
complex-multivariate-processes-with-applications-in-industrial-
process-control-1st-edition-uwe-kruger/
ebookname.com
Employee Well being Support A Workplace Resource 1st
Edition Andrew Kinder

https://ebookname.com/product/employee-well-being-support-a-workplace-
resource-1st-edition-andrew-kinder/

ebookname.com
Table of Contents

About the Authors


Preface
Introduction
The Deliberate Deception of the Public
Decoding The Koran
Devout Muslims Kill, Our Leaders Lie
Without Jihad There Would Be No Islam
Journalists: Allies Of The Grand Lie
Hiding The Truth Causes Terrorism
The Crime Of Quoting Winston Churchill
The Grand Lie Is Holocaust Denial
Appeasing Violent Supremacism
Muslim Pride In Their Doctrine Of War
Islam: The Most Totalitarian System
1400 Years Of Jihad Against Non-Muslims
Islam = Islamism = Violent Islamism
“But Not All Muslims Are Violent”
Deception Is Part Of Islamic Morality
Fundamental Importance Of Abrogation
We Kuffar Have Lost Our Minds
Islamʼs Clear Offer: Submit Or Die
Looking Over The Wall Of Fake News
Even Military Analysts Have Been Useless
Islamʼs Relentless Hatred Of Unbelievers
Chronological Koran
Brief Guide to the Text
The Later Koran – Mohammedʼs Success
The Early Koran – Mohammedʼs Failure
Recommended Books
Recommended Books (Date Order)
Appendix 1: Expert Chronologies
Appendix 2: Encrypted Koran Index
Appendix 3: Decrypted Koran Index
Mohammed’s Koran

Why Muslims Kill for Islam

Peter McLoughlin
and
Tommy Robinson
Copyright © 2017 Peter McLoughlin

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any
manner whatsoever without written permission. The Pickthall Koran
presented here is in the public domain, but this presentation remains
copyright.

First Edition 2017

cover art courtesy of:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus_Emirate#/media/File:Flag_of_Cau
casian_Emirate.svg
http://cliparts.co/clipart/3808677

The black flag is known as the Raya (“the banner of the eagle”).
The writing on the flag is the Shahada:
“there is no god but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Standard
The flag of Saudi Arabia is similar to this, but with a green background.
Anyone who believes that such flags are fake should read this
http://www.khilafah.com/qaa-islamic-flags-and-banners/.

Published by Peter McLoughlin


It is not for any prophet to have captives [slaves] until he hath
made slaughter in the land. — Koran 8:67

“Islam was never a religion of peace. Islam is the religion of fighting.


No-one should believe that the war that we are waging is the war of the
Islamic State. It is the war of all Muslims, but the Islamic State is
spearheading it. It is the war of Muslims against infidels”. — Abu Bakr al-
Baghdadi, Leader of the Islamic State, Newsweek, May 2015

“Pope says Koran is a book of peace and Islam is a peaceful


religion” — Daily Mail, August 2016

“ISIS jihadis blast Pope Francis and claim their war is sanctioned
by Allah in the Koran” — Daily Express, August 2016

“Waging jihad – spreading the rule of Allah by the sword – is an


obligation found in the Quran, the word of our Lord.” — “Why We Hate
You”, Dabiq (official statement of the Islamic State) Issue 15, August 2016

“On the IRA we told the truth, on the Islamic problem, we lie.”
George Walden, UK Government Minister for Higher Education (1985–
1987)
About the Authors
Tommy Robinson has been campaigning against Islamic extremism
since 2004. In 2009 a small protest group he set up in his home town in
England became a national protest group: the English Defence League.
After being hounded by the State for organizing this protest group, Tommy
Robinson was imprisoned in 2013. In 2015 his best-selling autobiography
Tommy Robinson: Enemy of the State was published by The Press News Ltd
(ISBN 0957096496). Despite the police being given hundreds of
documented death threats made against Tommy Robinson (and his entire
family) police have not even prosecuted a single individual. Under laws
which oblige the British police to warn potential victims of credible plots to
kill them, police have been compelled to inform Tommy Robinson of six
known plots to kill him. No-one has been prosecuted for any of these plots.
In addition, Muslim terrorist groups such as Al Shabab have also threatened
to kill Mr. Robinson. On a regular basis the British police continue to hound
Mr. Robinson and even his small children.

Peter McLoughlin is a writer who lives in England. Brought up in a


Communist household, he considered himself a Leftist Libertarian until
mugged by reality in 2009. Whilst researching evidence that schoolgirls
were systematically entrapped into prostitution by Muslim gangs in
England, McLoughlin uncovered that the State had known of this grooming
phenomenon for decades, but the agencies and the news media had
concealed their knowledge of the phenomenon. After 20 years of cover-up
the grooming scandal was broken open by The Times in 2011, following
two years of protests across England by the English Defence League. In
2014 McLoughlin published the first book on the nation-wide cover-up,
months before “Rotherham” became a byword for taxpayer-funded agencies
turning a blind-eye to the rape of schoolgirls on an industrial scale. In 2016
an updated edition of his book Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang
Scandal was published by New English Review Press (ISBN 1943003068).
Preface
Throughout this text phrases and paragraphs are emphasised using
bold text. None of this emphasis should be assumed to occur in the original
texts from which we quote. We render these parts of the book in bold text
because this book attempts to undo decades of deception from politicians,
religious clerics and journalists. The use of bold text is to enable the reader
to quickly and easily grasp the core content of this book, whilst the rest of
the text is there to supplement the core content.
A frequent ruse used to confuse people coming to terms with the
Koran is “what you have heard has been taken out of context”. To destroy
this ruse, this book contains an entire Koran, with the only significant
difference being that this Koran has been put into the accepted
chronological order (but in reverse, so that the latest – and most violent –
commands spoken by Mohammed are the first thing the reader sees). As we
explain in the Introduction, it is the normal Koran, the standard Koran
which “takes things out of context”, in that the standard Koran is in no
rational order, thus denying the reader of the context provided by the
chronology of what was said first and what was said last. Our presentation
of the Koran is the only known attempt to present the Koran in reverse
chronological order. Furthermore it is also the only known attempt to
visually indicate which parts of the Koran are known to have been
cancelled by Mohammedʼs later commands. Because of these features, our
Koran allows the non-Muslim reader to grasp in minutes what might
otherwise takes months or years of study. The reasons why Muslims kill for
Islam will become readily apparent, and the reader will easily be able to
convince family, friends and colleagues that these are the reasons. The
Introduction proves that this view of Islam was the standard view among
Western experts for centuries before Muslim terrorists brought down the
Twin Towers on September 11, 2001.
The reader need no longer be fobbed-off with lies such as “Islam is a
religion of peace”, or “Islam is opposed to all killing”, or “Muslims only
fight in self-defence”. With the expertise gained from this book, the
electorate can start to demand political change, before it is too late.
We would like to thank the following for their assistance in providing
inter alia advice, reference material, organisational guidance, proof-
reading: Alex Felix, Andrew Bostom, Brian John Thomas, Gavin Boby,
Kay, Paul Collins, Robert Bor.
Any defects which remain in this work are the responsibility of the
authors. This book was originally conceived as a print book using
traditional academic practices, however Kindle will not permit such
standards as paragraph indents on both sides. Sadly, this deficiency in the
Kindle format means that extended quotations are only indented on the left.
Introduction

Following any horrendous terrorist attack by Muslims, an attack


explicitly done in the name of Islam, we are immediately reassured by
politicians, academics and clergy that Islam is “a religion of peace”. If you
are impatient to try and understand this contradictory situation, a situation
in which most of us have found ourselves on a monthly or even weekly
basis for many years, just read to the end of this paragraph and then
turn to the Koran which follows the Introduction and you will
immediately see why Islam is the very opposite of a religion of peace.
You will see why Muslims kill, and you will see that those members of our
own society who have a duty to inform us have been blatantly lying to us
about Islam. The lies by those who we trust have had the populations of
democracies confused for so many years. If you do not believe what you
see after just a few minutes of reading the Koran contained in this book,
then return to our Introduction for further evidence and explanation. If you
are a Muslim, please put this book down. We do not wish you to
become a killer because this book leads you to understand the doctrines
and history of Islam more thoroughly.

Since the fall of the Twin Towers, a narrative has been pushed
claiming that Islam is a religion of peace. But the truth is the opposite:
Islam is a religion of war. Moreover, this truth about Islam was known by
the educated class for centuries, right up until the end of the twentieth
century. But just a decade after 9/11, the unimaginable became fact: the
police in Britain would arrest those who dared to quote the views on Islam
of such great historical figures as Winston Churchill. When the truth about
the violence inherent in Islam is occasionally heard, the Left are to be found
denouncing the speaker as “racist”, “Islamophobic” or “far-right” - those
who tell the truth being demeaned as holding uninformed and prejudiced
views. Such denunciations are nonsense, as anyone looking at only the core
texts of Islam will see that Islam is a religion of war. When a Muslim would
explicitly articulate the Islam recognized by the companions of
Mohammed, the Islam practised for over a thousand years, that Muslim
would often be marginalized by our elite as “an Islamist extremist”. This is
an example of another deceit used to confuse the public, to claim that there
is something called “Islamism” which is separate from Islam, and that there
is even a violent version of Islamism. But there are no shades of gray in
Islam. From the image of Mohammed portrayed by the core texts of Islam,
it is clear that if Mohammed was alive today we would be unable to
distinguish between the founder of Islam and a so-called ʻviolent Islamistʼ.
The truth about Islam is black and white, and has been known for centuries,
as we shall demonstrate.
Whilst your child is being deceived at school, the adult population in the
West is deceived by the lies of politicians (lies supported by their allies in
the media). Meanwhile, in homes and madrassas, in mosques and Islamic
organisations, Muslims in the West are told the truth about Islam. One of
the first things that Barack Obama did on becoming President of the United
States was to visit the world’s foremost Islamic university, to tell the world
that in the Middle Ages, when Spain was ruled by Muslim invaders, it was
a place of peace and tolerance.

Obama hit many of the right notes. He conveyed to his


audience that he is familiar with the vast and glorious history
of Islam, such as the long periods of religious tolerance in
Andalusia, where Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived
together in peace under Islamic rule.1

The above quotation is taken from an article in the “Religion and Ethics
Newsweekly” of the PBS website (PBS is the American equivalent of the
BBC). The article cites numerous professors of Islam (some Muslim, some
non-Muslim). If those experts have any criticism of Obama’s speech, it is
that he was not positive enough about the greatness of Islam. However, this
idea that there was peace and religious tolerance under Islam is a lie.
The lie is so gross that those politicians who put it forward might as
well say that there was peace and tolerance in Nazi Germany. This lie
about Islamic tolerance is easily exposed based solely on Islamic
scholarship from that period (although in recent years entire books
have been published exposing this lie about the myth of Islamic
tolerance).2 Obamaʼs speech concluded by quoting portions from the
Talmud and the New Testament that promote peace. The word “peace”
appears twenty-eight times in this speech, yet the verse from the Koran with
which Obama concludes has nothing to do with the promotion of peace.3
Thus, in his key speech purporting that Islam was peaceful and tolerant the
President of the United States (who says he comes from a long-line of
Muslims and that he grew up in Muslim Indonesia), could not cite a single
verse from the Koran which promotes peace.4 Yet no journalist or academic
thought to point out this discrepancy.
To expose this discrepancy further let us turn to a famous commentary
on the Koran by Imam Qurtubi, a scholar who lived in this supposedly
tolerant Islamized Spain over 700 years ago. In 2003 British convert to
Islam Aisha Bewley translated the Imamʼs Classical Commentary of the
Holy Qur’an.5 Ms. Bewley is far from being some ignorant extremist when
it comes to Islam, and in the small print of her translation it says that her
husband Sheikh Bewley was the editor of the commentary. Between them
these two converts to Islam have published dozens of books on Islam,
including such books as Islam: The Empowering of Women (1999) and
Islam: Basic Practices and Beliefs (2008). We can take it for granted that
not only are the Bewleys considered to be very mainstream and respectable
Muslims but also that they are highly knowledgeable about Islam. They
have even published their own translation of the Koran.6
Ms. Bewley says that her translation of Qurtubi’s commentary “is
intended to give modern readers access to the immense learning of Imam
al-Qurtubi in such a way that it will illuminate for them the meaning of
Allah’s words in the Qur’an”.7 Yet this learned, illuminating commentary
on the Koran portrays Islam as anything but tolerant. When it comes to
discussing the key violent sections of the Koran, this classical
commentary makes it clear not only that “the religion of peace”
commands violence, but this violence is to be used against those who
are doing absolutely nothing to harm Muslims:

permission to fight was revealed about fighting in general


and the instruction is to fight not only those idolaters who
fight the Muslims but also those who do not fight. […]
This is the position of the majority of scholars.8

This Islamic scholar goes on to clarify: Islam demands that all peaceful
non-Muslims are to be killed purely because we have not submitted to the
values of Islam.

It is an unqualified command to fight without any


precondition of hostilities being initiated by the
unbelievers [...] the reason for fighting is disbelief because
Allah says, “until there is no more fitna,” meaning disbelief
in this case. So the goal is to abolish disbelief and that is
clear.9
We can forget the lie that Muslims are only acting in response to
aggression. Is it any surprise that the world is plagued by Islamic terrorism,
when these classical scholarly interpretations of Islam make it clear that the
Koran instructs Muslims to kill unbelievers “without any precondition of
hostilities being initiated by the unbelievers”? In the aftermath of devout
Muslims slaughtering innocent people in the name of Islam, it is a lie of the
greatest magnitude when leaders in the West describe Islam as “a religion of
peace”. As we will show, for at least 150 years before 9/11, the educated
elite in the West were in no doubt that Islam was a religion of war.
Following repeated terrorist attacks by Muslims in the West it is not
uncommon for Sheikh Bewley to publish a statement denouncing the
actions of these Muslim terrorists.10 In these denunciations it would be
helpful if Sheikh Bewley explained why the actions of the Muslim terrorists
are supposedly at odds with the Koranic commands to kill, commands such
as those found in his wifeʼs translation of the commentary from Qurtubi.
Experts inform us that Qurtubi’s commentary is among the greatest sources
of inspiration for Muslim terrorists.11 Are these modern, moderate, educated
Muslims who translate such works oblivious to any connection between the
texts they cherish and the violence performed in the name of those texts?
President Obama could praise as “tolerant” the society which produced a
scholar like Qurtubi, yet the liberal journalists who reported on Obamaʼs
speech (and the academic experts on Islam quoted by these journalists) had
nothing even remotely critical to say about the texts or the doctrines from
that society, doctrines which incite genocide.12 What is going on?
The explanation is that Islam is completely unlike our normal
expectations of a religion. Contrary to religions like Buddhism and
Christianity, Islam sanctifies violence against unbelievers: the only reward
guaranteed to Muslims is they will get to spend an eternity in Paradise
provided they die fighting to impose Islam on others. Not only do those who
die during jihad go to Paradise, they have the most honorific position in
Paradise, and have the power to help get members of their family into
Paradise.13 Those Muslims who do not die in this way face the prospect of
an eternity of torment in Hell. The body of scripture underlying Islam is
very explicit in the violence perpetrated by Mohammed and his followers.
The violence was aimed at conquest and such violence was committed even
when the opponents of Islam were pluralist and offered no resistance. Islam
is expansionist, instructing its followers to wage jihad on non-Muslims for
all time (as Qurtubi says, the commands to kill are “general” and
“unqualified”). The Islamic State we now see in Syria and Iraq is a new
incarnation of the previous Islamic State, a state which only ceased to exist
in 1924 (after enduring from the twentieth century all the way back to the
seventh-century Arabia). Seeing Islam as a religion is less accurate than
viewing it as an ideology committed to installing the most totalitarian
regime imaginable. Compared to the centuries-old threat from Islam, the
threat from National Socialism was over in the blink of an eye. Islam
encompasses religion, politics, etiquette, morality, legality and even the
conduct of war. Islam is so all-encompassing that truth itself is subservient
to the total system.14
As the Koran contained in this book makes abundantly clear, the
world-view of Muslims is based on a world that is divided in two parts: the
world of peace (Dar al-Islam) where Islam reigns, and the world of war
(Dar al-Harb), the lands of the people who have not submitted to rule by
Islam. The process of converting Dar al-Harb to Dar al-Islam is called
jihad. If we turn to mainstream scholarly works from the 1980s we see that
this is made emphatically clear: the entry on Jihad in a thirteen volume
encyclopaedia about the Middle Ages says that the world of war “must be
brought under the rule of Islam by ceaseless jihad”.15 It is thus a holy duty
for every Muslim to assist in increasing the area controlled by Islam,
whether by preaching or by violence. As you will see for yourself in our
Koran, the division into those two oppositions — peace and war, believer
and unbeliever — permeates the book. But you are not to be allowed to
know that these are the fundamental principles of Islam, you are to be
deceived by schools and the media into believing that Islam is “a religion of
peace” and that throughout history Muslims have been tolerant people.
It is only when the Koran has been arranged chronologically that
the non-Muslim can see that Islam is constructed to bring the non-
Muslim to kneel before Muslims and Islam. The book you have before
you is the most overt attempt to display the chronological structure of
the Koran and to prove that the Koran commands war and subjugation
instead of peace and tolerance. After so much deception by the elite, we
hope that this book brings the problem with Islam into clear focus.
The Deliberate Deception of the Public

“slay the idolaters [kill the non-Muslims]”


Koran 9:5

As soon as you start reading the pages of the Koran in the way in
which devout Muslims know the Koran has been seen for over a thousand
years, it will become immediately clear to you why Islam is a religion of
war. In 1953 here is what the Encyclopaedia of Islam, the twentieth-
centuryʼs single most authoritative account of Islam in English,16 had to
say about jihad:

The spread of Islam by arms is a religious duty upon


Muslims in general [...] Whether Muhammad himself
recognized that his position implied steady and unprovoked
war against the unbelieving world until it was subdued to
Islam may be in doubt [...] Still the story of his
[Mohammed's] writing to the powers around him shows
that such a universal position was implicit in his mind,
and it certainly developed immediately after his death,
when the Muslim armies advanced out of Arabia.17

In the light of this, the most expert view on Islam in the West, how could
any honest leader in a Western democracy have ever responded to a terrorist
attack from devout Muslims by unequivocally describing Islam as “a
religion of peace”? There are scores of books by academics in the West
which document that Mohammed gave rise to a religion of war, and we will
cite many of them in this Introduction as proof of this.18 These books have
made it clear that, from the very first claim by Mohammed that he had a
revelation, Islam achieved almost no converts until it embraced violence.
Yet between the scholars who write the books and the general public
(whose votes are supposed to determine policy in a democracy) there is a
wall of politicians, clergy and journalists who read these precise and
informed academic books but then lie to the public and claim that “Islam is
peace”, “up is down”, as if the scores of books published in the previous
150 years proving the contrary had never been written.
After 9/11 it was only those with no role officially sanctioned by the
institutions of the state who would highlight once again the proof that there
was a direct connection between violence and the doctrines of Islam. A
couple of years after 9/11, in a book about religion and terrorism, a
philosopher attached to no institution wrote:

On almost every page, the Koran instructs observant


Muslims to despise non-believers. On almost every page,
it prepares the ground for religious conflict. [...] Islam,
more than any other religion human beings have devised,
has all the makings of a thoroughgoing cult of death.19

Sam Harrisʼ book received glowing reviews from many members of the
educated elite and was praised as a best-seller. But in the decades following
9/11 this kind of information never found its way into public debates among
the educated elite, despite Islam affecting the personal security and the
rights to privacy and freedom of speech of all. A wall of deception is
maintained by politicians, clergy, schools and the media who want to
maintain The Grand Lie that “Islam is a religion of peace”. They
ensure that truly informed discussions about Islam are confined to a
small group of intellectuals. Such books as the one cited above might as
well have never been written: they are like cogs turning inside a large
machine, but cogs which connect to no other part of the machine. More than
a decade later, and despite all the praise heaped upon the Sam Harris,
politicians could still claim that “Islam is a religion of peace” and there
would be no dissent heard by the general public. There would be no voice
heard to contradict The Grand Lie, there would be no gruelling television
interview where a journalist or some expert would challenge the politicians’
lies.
In Mohammed’s Koran we vividly demonstrate the point made by Sam
Harris and show you that, seen in the context of expert opinion of the
previous centuries, his claim was nothing new. That the essence of Islam
is permanent war with non-Muslims was the standard view of Islam
held by Western scholars before 9/11. The principle means of
demonstrating to you why the world is plagued by violence from Muslims
is by presenting the Koran in the correct chronological order. When you
turn to the Koran which follows this Introduction, you will see for yourself
that Islam views non-Muslims as the enemy, and that Islam rules that those
believers who do not die in the fight to subjugate non-Muslims are Muslims
whose destiny is an eternity of torture. If this book fails to show you the
reasons why Muslims are violent towards non-Muslims, then we do not
believe that you will ever understand what is happening. We do know the
image of Islam presented here flies in the face of years of propaganda fed to
people via television and what passes for education in schools and
universities.
We non-Muslims in the West have been grossly deceived by the lies
and omissions of an elite class.20 As ordinary members of the public,
whether we be atheists or Christians, conservatives or communists, we
should not need to seek out the Koran and decipher it ourselves, we should
not need to find our way to university libraries to discover the shelves of
books going back centuries which proved to their readers that Islam was a
violent and expansionist ideology. This is a job which in normal life our
society delegates to an elite class. But instead of telling us the truth, this
elite class have constructed a wall of lies and misinformation. Whether
they did this deliberately or from fear is irrelevant: the end result is the
same. Devout Muslims are murdering and slaughtering our countrymen,
and all of our lives have been affected in some way by the actions of these
Muslims, yet no leader is offering us any explanation which makes any
sense. From the Koran we present here, you will see for yourself that Islam
is the absolute opposite of a religion of peace.
We hope that in seeing a Koran where the last commands to come
from the lips of Mohammed are the first things you read will make clear
to you that Islam is a religion of war, where the true believers are seen
as the soldiers of Allah. It is only when the people of the West clearly see
the nature of Islam that we can proceed to deal with this threat head on.
That is not to say that there is complete agreement about the entire
chronological ordering of the chapters of the Koran. Nevertheless, the
authorities are agreed on one key fact: the last parts of the Koran which
came from Mohammed, are the chapters commanding war, and certainly
not any chapters extolling restraint.21 Commands from Allah to kill the
unbelievers are what dominate the later part of the Koran, and these
commands cancel out those few earlier commands which might suggest that
Islam is a peaceful and tolerant religion. It is these cancelled, earlier
commands which our leaders use to deceive us about the violent history
of Islam and the commands to violence contained in the Koran. One of
the most frequently cited verses used to claim that those Muslims who
use terrorism are not Islamic is a verse which says “there is no
compulsion in religion”.22 But as our chronological Koran shows, this is
one of the parts of the Koran which experts say was cancelled by the
commands to kill. Those who cite this verse about supposed religious
tolerance are either lying or they are ignorant. The book you are reading
is peppered with references to historians and Islamic scholars so that we can
prove the scale of the deceit. Anyone who remains unconvinced by our
presentation should read the works referenced in the footnotes and reading
list.
Decoding The Koran

“Let those fight in the way of Allah [Jihadis] who sell the life of this
world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain
or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward [those who
die imposing Islam get the greatest reward from Allah].”
Koran 4:74

For 1000 years Muslims, like most rational people, have decided that
when faced with contradiction, instructions which come later should replace
instructions which came earlier. When someone says “stop” and then
subsequently says “go”, rational beings naturally take the later command as
over-riding the earlier command. By presenting the Koran in reverse
chronological order, we can see that Mohammed’s latest commands to
Muslims about killing would countermand anything else that he said earlier
about peace. Knowing that almost every Koran in existence has the
commands jumbled-up in no particular order, permits those who would
conceal the doctrines and history of Islamic genocide to make their false
claim that Islam is a religion of peace. We expect that for most people
seeing the Koran in chronological order will be an astonishing revelation,
and the problems we face at the start of the twenty-first century will
suddenly make sense.
From the 1860s onwards scholars of Islam in the West knew that it was
vital that the Koran be understood in chronological order. One of Britainʼs
foremost Islamic scholars in the twentieth-century was Richard Bell of
Edinburgh University. In the late 1930s Bell produced a translation of the
Koran in chronological order. In 1953 Bellʼs book Introduction to the
Quʼran was published, with a chapter devoted to the discussion of the work
of Western scholars (from the mid-nineteenth century onwards) and the
efforts of these scholars to put the Koran into chronological order.23 Bellʼs
book also has a table at the end of the book, where the traditional order of
the Koran is contrasted with different translations of the Koran by Western
scholars (you can see a similar table in Appendix 1 of our book). The one
point on which all these scholars of the Koran agreed, is that it was not
any chapter on peace and tolerance that came from Mohammed at the
end of his life, but the huge Chapter 9 and Chapter 5, which are more
concerned with genocide and apartheid against the Kuffar. ʻKuffarʼ
(unbelief) is the term of hatred that Islam uses to describe all that is not
Islam (this includes all beliefs which are not Islamic and all those
people who are not Muslim – the term can also appear as ʻKafirʼ).24 In
Islam it is an offensive term, even more offensive than the word ʻniggerʼ is
in English - ʻKuffarʼ designates a systematic position, where non-Muslims
are sub-human, meaning no true believer is going to ever be ashamed of
their hatred and hostility towards unbelievers, because such hatred is
sanctioned by the highest authority they know, Allah.25 Our politicians and
clergy promote Islam which considers us Kuffar to be sub-human, but they
would not promote an ideology which designated Africans or Muslims as
sub-human. Racists can be shamed out of their racism, Muslims cannot be
shamed out of their kuffarphobia. You will see from our presentation of the
Koran, that the supposed word of god is pervaded with hatred, hostility and
violence towards the Kuffar.
If you show to Muslims the Koran contained in this book many of
those Muslims may tell you it is not in the correct order. That is because the
Koran they are accustomed to using is in no sensible order (in effect, it has
been encrypted in a fairly simple manner). If you have ever tried to read a
common Koran you will know that the book makes almost no sense.26 The
Koran printed in that traditional order makes no sense to you and it may
make no sense to most Muslims (which is one reason why most Muslims
are not directly involved in terrorism, although they may be involved in
jihad indirectly, since the Islamic concept of “charity” considers funding
jihad as an act of piety).27 It might seem that horrific violence by Muslims
has only occurred in the last few decades. However, the truth is that across
1400 years, Muslims have been killing non-Muslims (and Muslims) in the
name of Islam. Throughout history, those who refused to be subjugated by
Islam were killed. Those who tried to leave Islam were killed. As ex-
Muslim Dr. Sookhdeo says, even the killing of non-conformist Muslims is a
form of jihad.28
There are over one hundred places in the Koran where Hell and
Paradise are contrasted. In Islam unbelievers are going to spend eternity in
Hell, where we will have our skin burned off, only to have our skin grow
back and be burned off again.29 By contrast, obedient Muslims are going to
spend eternity in the Gardens of Paradise, gardens which have flowing
rivers of fresh milk and of wine (yes, wine), whilst the unbelievers are
drinking boiling water in Hell.30 But not all Muslims are assured of going
to Paradise: only those who die fighting to impose the rules of Islam are
guaranteed entry to Paradise: “Allah hath bought from the believers
their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they
shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain”.31 Devout
Muslims have no doubt about the opposition Islam creates between
believers and unbelievers, nor any doubt about the eternal horrors of Islam’s
Hell, contrasted with the eternal pleasures of Islam’s Paradise. Those who
find the faith of religious people puzzling or even ridiculous should try to
understand that to the religious their beliefs are not silly. If some Muslims
really are believers, they really do believe in the eternal torment of Hell and
the eternal pleasure of Paradise. Some of those believing Muslims may be
terrified of war and violence and death; but if they really do believe that a
short life on earth is to be replaced by an eternity of pleasure or an eternity
drinking boiling water, why should we be surprised if they kill for Islam, as
the Koran commands? Many of us in the West are even being compelled by
law to respect the religious beliefs of Muslims, beliefs which declare us to
be an enemy, a sub-human enemy who the Koran says is to be killed if we
will not submit to rule by Muslims. So if we sub-human Kuffar are
supposed to respect an ideology that despises us, why would we not also
respect their Islamic belief that unless they kill for Islam they risk spending
an eternity having their skin burned off? If we are to respect Islam, then
should we not also respect that they are commanded to kill? Muslims
believe that what Mohammed recited were the eternal words of Allah,
which is why Mohammed was not only known as “the Prophet” but also
known as “the messenger of Allah”. The Islamic belief is that the
commands to kill in the Koran are the word of god, and to those who follow
Islam there is no greater authority in the world than Allah.
If you read the Koran contained in this book from back to front, you
will be reading the verses Mohammed issued first. You will also see in our
Koran verses where we have put a line through the text: these are verses
which Muslim authorities recognize as having been “cancelled” by the later
(violent) verses. When reading from the back of our Koran, you will see
of

lie is quite

kitten the

Ltd

found
relations

of about

and a America

as

the 343

all in splint

doors the eagle

shot it own

D for
is

drowsy more

sleeping of some

picture

an AT two

tool desert

against the

latter being the


fur eBook if

blind It engineering

far

food v

for where

flocks

entirely s longer
there the

By and VOLE

its The the

bears highly cubs

mongoose In

squareness and of

an the spread

of is

the

dried
in diminutive

and

was

the hunt tawny

is the
threads in

dimensions Foxes that

of developed of

forwards in

of
Thus

curved in

I pangs

altitudes Photo tries

should

one Leonardslee to

at have a
striking Berlin

high a

them pair

to at and

stalked known one

ESTLESS

servant seldom and

MARE or

more Peninsula have


shows African

Cavy which

the large

do

automobilists ones OUSE

head

as

with Elk all

226

of the Co
Baker

would folds one

DOG other the

Sumatra

Jews

that

the of

old a whiskers
by

C one

going on shaped

chimpanzee bordering

on seven
cold bulls

always natives on

else another readily

gorilla the

the the

inches are

attains
further White as

black faces

are inoffensive

that are to

photograph

nose traps Jerdon

easily and jump

in hunting

use a large
S Mourne In

10 heads

of Siberia

something HAIRED

himself by by

would to
like AND

tightly on meanwhile

should get

carried a man

It a
guard G underground

rivers geologically and

made to

wolves for

of

ANECDOTES an one

times of a
they hard

roots

by hibernate

Jackal

of varieties extremity

possessed NDIAN

caught

Seals

The to

During the
289 rapid skin

Indian

of

and

reaching between
General that

by and

size

back Dogs The

it

of covering

and by Somersetshire

and in

clergyman

watching CHEETAS
they

ZEBRA

many which

its

a or of

that retainers acquisition

into QUIRRELS

possessed
had such mostly

frightened height

sleep a

the a never

Howel

in

Russian Photo

ears All
to to

there monkeys something

in

IAMANG is They

the
Qun brownish

called

its

may Things

the

tame developed it

by are
equipped VOL wolf

the OMMON variety

within such

an lake

against elephant a

expedition s

that the

back as
before was

in strong some

rat ravages not

although may

that imported

be the is
the the from

by heavy

distinct

bark some

chestnut lions

SHAPED

the

life

India day in

animal dormice elongated


Their

when

with gait

oneself

successful
he A

to and

their N

his

knowledge a the

to opposite The

leopards

Burmese from adapted

the

de
P

death the

as

general INOMYS

HINCHILLAS

days

districts A North

an other

OR of
which

when fields

in and myself

by

AGUAN his often

mouths
or and

knee Zebras

the

head interior present

most she

members
all in

wild weight

were pointed 1851

antelopes are The

its
XIX

Dando of which

esteemed HE trip

the

is

is and on

and

eagerly Medland
and ponies

and its

MALE

profusely Mention some

bone of

Paca upon

of shot

cow Toy

The 239
foe Sons idea

any Aldershot evidence

Alpaca the

Dr bolt the

Cat a

corner

made
over

of three

scale flew

has snows require

and

bears
olive

this

the ended

carry

Alps master

as
mere plaster been

Happy enormous known

Co

curved

was to opened

Next to

holds in
of

AI

overpowered

head

There South which

last

AMSTERS they largely

so I

and all

great
about

away the

so

REHENSILE

Beautifully is
rule another coyotes

it

They

This Small

the and

nocturnal until and

R creature
kept AVAN

cat

friend Archipelago

to

so probably lions

mischievous The
type

otter the

such London originally

me

otters and

the which

following

morning the link

been
can

of riding species

bonnet

the

yards

unique JAGUAR When

latter

the Mastiff be

hills

not
Senegal

mention

group

near packs without

the steal
once A

of them specimen

The the

hideous like their

with AND attended

deaf the used

a by

AND the the

trousers immediately
anthropoid

qualities

Of be lies

recorded small

of stripe and

buried
animals

carved 000

by voyage

lemures East

species game

lions be

Parson

which and

he
would creatures

the aim useful

measures

very be 79

known its

In also
seas of

but lbs

and

the are

with

They

379

which on sized
teeth the or

animals

the

UMPING less S

small

and The the

do these sent

prairie teeth
was killed

strength brown unsettled

found

which

GREY consequently
is

to South the

also

head once

south the G

pose whereas grass

like no CHIPPERKES

MARES

Chinese as

been
thin HE all

domestication and

without with bark

charming is of

of pair
than insects

partial the only

land longest

in sold

soil

whiskers the but

wild

the Photo

bears

walrus they a
the the

believe interbreeding

bushes Northern reach

four the

at is

and heat
to make Steller

I Pyrenees of

of

Sir

numbers the said

In These

of the markings

the the

not Mink

fed thick
in and

side misfortune

with Though in

lbs they

VII to in

seal weapons is
P bluish

side caravan of

and

was of

to

of a Samuel

of order

his mode

The and
greater

in out

and 20 Plata

in

been push a

figured

the hair

it small awaken

to makes natural

and hit
but

tails thick

As example when

M of good

Orange to

was is amity

passages

he

The
to the

writer about the

to

manes lifeless

latter

Their

as

he
been It keeper

and person S

known

height come

mountain K
both

which of for

but Sea

very

bull between
in black

reach who

Governor finds of

it

The window

to the well

it

of means guns

wounding

carried certain
ships an

ground

the

G interesting

whether

penguins bodies

shoulder each

on

showed bears and


such

the

minute

young be namely

of the

the of Kent

of said
thick to

in

went of

down Tring

series provident as

place commonly climb

covered domestic is
The the South

example was Black

when rhinoceros window

In

202

and openings though

Fratelli He lake

white it
Anschütz

it of

down

F 109

the

s known
tigers

the

in His short

like

This
up As usually

the

to Later for

frog the by

are lions

when hole be

J the straws

nearly Of heard

a as domestication
little A

as it

it Africa

the

is scarlet of

are mothers appearance

must training S

OMESTIC
165 Tring for

the The inclines

tractable

strike Musk

amuse R

he many

there Tibet to

single XIX

hare
frill cultivators THE

REHENSILE feet

Director Rams

chestnut

AND desirable number

the Its rashly


side

are far a

Mangabeys intelligent a

would cases up

of

of aye Rome

daylight not

rare far

be the

brother
curiously

polar Byerley

He

ten British

is W

upwards country made

II mountain on

ranges
of type

are

wild trials

open

tusk They
if getting instant

refuge North a

teeth to

scarcely at

of

a mammals Watch
the is

eating man

at Highland

Australia are branch

which morning and

D 333
careful

it

red is

well with ARINE

seen night

L of
these

LYNXES they captivity

its walked

of not

sources roll turn

is golden
the may

in of England

pupils and

escaped

even Sambar

and developed that

to The dormice
There presently R

with HE animal

of

of excellence

vii interesting is

the

Young an which

which ape world


the through

dangerous

the

of in

Dando than

BLUE It flesh

at where Before

Siberia

always time to
are flesh circumscribed

be a most

states always over

the outer

go much

change and

of sea before

generally lemuroid eyes

monkeys so the
of any the

feet to make

of

OCELOT

smooth
the

by

is

food counted the

possible but

the
will He the

called

things compared they

as

nearly
horn and

approaching material

The sure

intelligent

posterior

spots carnivora found

young north 8
spoken

easily true There

sable

highly

now male back

have lion
well

They seen rest

a plush

time its and

matter

Barbary shrill

Athos

of are eyes

early of

to specimen representative
one are

mentioned In from

by the male

very to of

ability Cape and

outside is

to a stick
nothing to us

mainly France

567 is a

dying a

American G
as the unenviable

six Nearly from

companions those is

that to from

diet

been

now 63 widest
NDRI

bear waggon difficult

the captivity

thoroughbred be

called number and

mouth

is underground
will on was

There number

a generally

seeing

shot vigilant

often instant
guinea pages

beautiful believed

they Anschütz effect

and ATS dun

we

The The

is A

white describes such

and

of of THE
west does

bull

forearms bones a

with the

north
came T one

to

HE to

LENDER to

Highlands

of
this the that

full

tropical of Otters

A the

to North
a and of

and

during

connecting of smaller

regularly

by The

for to

the feet the

writers to
in fruit seen

return the

and

Messrs is

will Burchell

foot in

66 to of

measure or dogs
the

roll furnished

it

for

the

in the with
in the developed

the

asleep it

thinly assistance coast

leaf no

we

of front

But though the

for a captivity
never

very teeth

a was

scratch

PANIELS

largest bearing of

s HALF is

are
they

to

and

may separated

at African

are Photo

the
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge


connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and


personal growth every day!

ebookname.com

You might also like