CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design Practices and Innovations (Marzuki, Arjuna) (2020)
CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design Practices and Innovations (Marzuki, Arjuna) (2020)
and Mixed-Signal
Circuit Design
CMOS Analog
and Mixed-Signal
Circuit Design
Practices and Innovations
Arjuna Marzuki
First edition published 2020
by CRC Press
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher
cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and
apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright
material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter
invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval
system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, access www.copyright.com or
contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-
8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact [email protected]
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Typeset in Times
by Lumina Datamatics Limited
Contents
Preface.......................................................................................................................xi
Acknowledgments................................................................................................... xiii
Author....................................................................................................................... xv
v
vi Contents
Chapter 3 Amplifiers............................................................................................ 61
3.1 Introduction.............................................................................. 61
3.1.1 CMOS Amplifier.......................................................... 61
3.2 Input Voltage Range................................................................. 61
3.2.1 Theory.......................................................................... 61
3.2.2 Example........................................................................ 62
3.3 Signal Path of CMOS Operational Amplifier..........................64
3.3.1 Overall Signal Path.......................................................64
3.3.2 Load.............................................................................. 65
3.3.3 Cascode Current Source...............................................66
3.3.4 Example........................................................................66
3.4 CMOS Amplifier Parameters................................................... 70
3.4.1 Input Offset................................................................... 70
3.4.2 Common Mode Input Voltage Range........................... 70
3.4.3 Current Consumption................................................... 70
3.4.4 Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR).................... 73
3.4.5 Power Supply Rejection Ratio...................................... 73
3.4.6 Slew Rate and Settling Time........................................ 73
3.4.7 DC Gain, fc, and f T. ...................................................... 75
3.4.8 Noise............................................................................. 75
3.4.9 Distortion...................................................................... 77
3.5 Common Mode Feedback........................................................ 79
3.6 Compensation in Amplifier...................................................... 81
3.6.1 Loop Response............................................................. 81
3.6.2 Pulse Response............................................................. 82
3.7 Wideband Amplifier Technique...............................................84
3.7.1 Source and Load...........................................................84
3.7.2 Stages and Feedback..................................................... 86
3.8 Noises in Amplifiers.................................................................90
3.8.1 Noise in Circuits...........................................................90
3.8.2 Noise in Single-Stage Amplifiers.................................92
3.8.3 Noise in Differential Pairs............................................96
3.8.4 Noise in Amplifier with Resistors in the Feedback......97
3.8.5 Noise Bandwidth.......................................................... 98
3.9 Current Density Design Approach......................................... 100
3.10 Layout Examples.................................................................... 100
3.11 Summary................................................................................ 101
References......................................................................................... 102
Contents vii
Index....................................................................................................................... 265
Preface
The purpose of this book is to provide a complete working knowledge of the
Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) analog and mixed-signal
circuit design, which can be applied for System on Chip (SOC) or Application-
Specific Standard Product (ASSP) development. The assumed background of the
reader is knowledge of linear circuits, discrete concepts, microelectronic devices,
and Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) systems. The first chapter covers an intro-
duction to CMOS analog and mixed-signal circuit design. This chapter gives an
overview of the subject of analog and mixed-signal circuit design, which is an intro-
duction to analog and digital integrated circuit design concepts. Three-dimensional
factors, such as technology, circuit topology, and methodology are described in this
chapter. The trade-offs concept is also discussed in this chapter.
CMOS technology continues to be the dominant technology for fabricating
integrated circuits. This book will cover basic devices such as the Metal-Oxide
Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET), with both long and short-channel
operations. This topic is covered in Chapter 2 solely to provide a MOSFET under-
standing to the readers. The understanding of the MOSFET is very crucial in CMOS
circuit design. Photo devices and other related devices are also discussed in this
chapter. A new topic such as the fitting ratio is included to discuss the design “trans-
fer” approach. This approach is useful for practicing engineers.
Seven chapters focus on the CMOS analog and mixed-signal circuit design.
There are amplifiers, low power amplifiers, voltage regulator-reference, data con-
verters, dynamic analog circuits, color and image sensors, and peripheral (oscillators
and Input/Output (I/O)) circuits. Two chapters (Chapters 6 and 7) out of seven
chapters emphasize the mixed-signal circuit design. Chapter 8 focuses on the exam-
ples of CMOS analog and mixed-signal circuit designs, such as color and image
sensors. One chapter is focused on the Integrated Circuit (IC) layout and packaging.
The knowledge of the IC layout and packaging is critical in the development of the
CMOS circuit design, especially for analog and mixed-signal IC products.
One of the aims of this book is to provide a text for an introductory course on
CMOS analog circuit design for senior undergraduates and graduate students.
Many examples and exercises are provided in this book. Some of the circuits are
ready to be simulated using the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tool such as
Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE). Chapters 2 and 3
are derived from the analog IC design senior undergraduate course at the Universiti
Sains Malaysia. These two chapters provide a quick and complete understanding of
CMOS analog circuit design.
This book presents practical methods working engineers have encountered in
the design of analog and mixed-signal circuits. Chapters 4–9 have been arranged
with earlier topics for the working engineers, while the remaining topics are for
the graduates or researchers. The principles and concepts discussed should never
xi
xii Preface
become outdated even though technology changes. For researchers, innovation top-
ics, such as the current-reuse technique and subthreshold operation, are important
for low power applications. Diodeless voltage reference and dynamic element match-
ing are also relevant for the researchers. This book surely provides design and layout
examples that will be immediately useful in commercial ICs.
Acknowledgments
I am indebted to those who helped us in bringing this book through the process of
idea to reality.
I also wish to express our appreciation to the School of Electrical and Electronic
Engineering of Universiti Sains Malaysia. Finally, the success of this book would
not have been possible without the kind assistance provided by my graduate students.
xiii
Author
Arjuna Marzuki received his BEng (Hons) in Electronic (Communication) from the
Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering of the University of Sheffield in
the United Kingdom, MSc from Universiti Sains Malaysia, and PhD from Universiti
Malaysia Perlis.
Arjuna joined Hewlett-Packard as an R&D engineer in Wireless Semiconductor
Division in 1997. His main jobs were to design Radio Frequency (RF) and radio fre-
quency integrated circuit (RFIC) products. Such products were high-frequency tran-
sistors, RF gain blocks, I/Q demodulator, etc. He then later joined IC Microsystems
Sdn. Bhd. in Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia, as IC design staff engineer. In the
company, he involved in designing 12/10/8 bits digital-to-analog converter ICs and
family of RFIC devices. He also managed to secure MYR 3.5 million MGS fund
for RFIC device research and development/commercialization. He later joined
Agilent Technologies as IC design engineer/manager in Optical Product Division.
His main jobs were to lead the analog design group, which was assigned to design
operational amplifiers, band-gap circuits, data-converters, I/Os, power-on reset, etc.
A small contribution by the group was “Industry’s 1st Digital Color Sensor IC with
I/O via 2-wire Serial Interface,” which was released in February 2006 by Avago
Technologies. He has been granted 1 US patent and has developed more than 20 com-
mercial products during his employment with Hewlett-Packard/Agilent Technologies
and IC Microsystems.
Arjuna had gained professional qualification as a professional and chartered engineer
when he was registered with the Board of Engineers Malaysia and Engineering Council
UK, respectively. He is a Fellow of The Institution of Engineering and Technology
(FIET). He was a recipient of the 2010 IETE J C Bose Memorial Award.
Arjuna is currently an associate professor at Universiti Sains Malaysia and
engaged in the teaching of analog integrated circuit courses at the undergraduate
and postgraduate levels. He is also active in supervising PhD students in the area
of microelectronic research. He has served as referees for many journals and con-
ferences. He has so far published more than 60 technical papers in journals and
conferences.
xv
1 CMOS Analog
and Mixed-Signal
Circuit Design
An Overview
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The analog circuit employs the analog signal, while the digital circuit employs the
signal that is defined only at discrete values of amplitude. A mixed-signal integrated
circuit is a combination of analog and digital integrated circuits. This book proposes
the concept of a signal path idea for circuit design insight. This book covers the prac-
tices and research topics of the analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits.
Design is a process to achieve at least three outputs or objectives, namely, electrical
specification, circuit schematic, and device parameters, such as Width/Length (W/L)
ratio. An analysis of a circuit is required to be done before the circuit is finalized. Using
modern tools in designing a circuit is unavoidable, however, designers need to realize
the modern tools are only used to validate the performance of the circuit. The “novelty”
or “robustness” of the circuit solely depended on the designers themselves.
This book is not about design procedures. This book stresses the concept of
design, and does not stress the mathematical. Nevertheless, the analysis does require
or use mathematical equations, so a balance of concept and equations will be applied
throughout this book.
1
2 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
FIGURE 1.1 Circuit symbols for n-channel and p-channel enhancement type of Metal-
Oxide Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors (MOSFETs).
Circuit
Technology
Topology
Final Design
Methodology
(EDA tools)
polysilicon, and there are no dedicated passive components such as MIM capacitor,
high sheet resistance resistor, and inductor. However, many analog circuits have used
standard CMOS technology.
There are also mixed-signal and RF CMOS technology, which are targeted for
the mixed-signal and RF application. The thick metal, which is for inductor design
has been included for the RF CMOS technology. The advanced CMOS technology
such as for Radio Frequency (RF) application is expensive compared to standard
CMOS technology.
Noise Linearity
Power
Gain
Dissipation
Voltage Swing
Speed
signals
signals
clk
clk
clk
Analog
domain
Digital
domain
Digital power
1.5 SUMMARY
This book focuses on the custom analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits.
This book will not focus on the basic digital circuit design, digital coding-related,
and back-end digital layout tool. Knowledge of the technology or process that is used
in circuit design is very crucial. Good design requires solid knowledge in the process
or technology. This is reflected in Figure 1.2. Chapter 2 details only standard CMOS
because the technology is still practical in the coming years. The rest of the chapters’
design concept is still applicable for different technologies. This book stresses many
figures and curves to describe the operation and behavior of circuitries. Readers are
encouraged to scrutinize the figures and curves for a better understanding of any
given subjects.
2 An Overview
Devices
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) technology continues to be
the dominant technology for fabricating integrated circuits. This book will cover
basic devices such as metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET)
with both long and short-channel operations. This topic is covered in one chapter
solely to provide a MOSFET understanding to the readers. The understanding of
MOSFET is very crucial in CMOS circuit design. Photo devices and other related
devices are also discussed in this chapter. A new topic such as fitting ratio is included
to discuss the “design transfer” approach. This approach is useful for practicing
engineers.
5
6 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
electron
Ec
Eg
Ev
hole
FIGURE 2.1 An electron moving to the conduction band, leaving behind a hole in the
valence band.
Ec Ec Ec
Ef n
Ei Ei Ei
Ef p
Ev Ev Ev
(a) (b) (c)
Ec
q · Vbi
Ec
Ef
Ev n-type
p-type
Ev
(d)
FIGURE 2.2 The Fermi energy levels in various structures: (a) intrinsic silicon, (b) p-type
silicon, (c) n-type silicon, and (d) A PN-junction diode.
Anode, A Cathode, K
+ VD –
p-type n-type
- - - - + +
- Depletion +
- region
+ +
- - - - + +
+ VD -
n-well
1.12 pF
Metal contact
_
+
p-type n-type
_ +
Minority carriers
Diode current
I
R
VF - 0.7
ts
R
I
VF Diode voltage
0.7
VR t2 time
VR - 0.7 VR
R
trr
t1 t3
Psub P+ gate
Nwell N+
FIGURE 2.8 Different pixel architectures: (a) N+/Psub, (b) P+/N_well, (c) N_well/Psub,
(d) combination of two photodiodes (P+/N_well and N_well/Psub), (e) vertical phototransis-
tor (P+/N_well/Psub), (f) lateral phototransistor (P+/N_well/P+), and (g) N_well/gate tied
phototransistors.
Devices 9
an amorphous silicon diode. These devices will improve the sensitivity of CMOS
image sensor (CIS). The pinned photodiode, which has low dark current, offers good
imaging characteristics for CIS [3].
2.4 FETs
2.4.1 Long Channel Approximation
2.4.1.1 MOS Structure
The MOS structure forms a capacitor. The gate and substrate are acting as plates of
a capacitor. The oxide layer is acting as the dielectric of the capacitor. This is shown
in Figure 2.9. The carrier concentration and its local distribution within the semicon-
ductor substrate can be manipulated by the external voltage applied to the gate and
the substrate terminal. The mass action law is:
n ⋅ p = ni 2 (2.1)
n and p denote the mobile carrier concentration, and ni denotes the intrinsic carrier
concentration of silicon. The mass action law gives us the equilibrium concentra-
tion of the mobile carriers in the semiconductor. Assuming the substrate doped uni-
formly with an acceptor concentration NA, Typically, NA is much greater than ni. ni is
approximately equal to 1.45 × 1010 cm−3 at room temperature. NA is typically on the
order to 1015 to 1016 cm−3. So, we can write,
ni 2
Ppo ≅ N A and n po ≅ (2.2)
NA
VG (Gate voltage)
Gate
Oxide
(SiO2 )
Semiconductor Oxide
substrate thickness
0 V (Substrate voltage)
b
The equilibrium Fermi level (EF ) within the bandgap is determined by the doping
type and doping concentration. The Fermi potential ∅F, given by Equation 2.3, is a
function of temperature and doping.
E F − Ei
∅F = (2.3)
q
For p-type,
kT n
∅ FP = ln i (2.4)
q NA
For n-type,
kT N D
∅ Fn = ln (2.5)
q ni
The electron affinity of silicon ( qx ) is the potential difference between the conduc-
tion band level and vacuum level (see Figure 2.10). The work function ( q∅ s ) is the
energy required for an electron to move from the Fermi level into free space.
q∅ s = qx + ( EC − E F ) (2.6)
Three separate components of the MOSFET system have different energy band dia-
grams (Figure 2.11). There is a built-in voltage drop due to the work function dif-
ference between the metal and the semiconductor. This built-in voltage drop occurs
across the insulating oxide layer and surface of the semiconductor.
Eo Free space
qx
Ec Conduction Band
Band-gap
energy 1.1 eV
Ei
qϕFp
EFp Fermi Level
Ev Valence band
Ec
Ei
EFm EFp
Ev
Oxide
Eox Eox
EFm
Ec
qVG
Ei
EFp
Holes accumulated
P-type Si substrate on the surface Ev
VB = 0
FIGURE 2.12 The cross-sectional view and the energy band diagram of the MOS structure
operating in accumulation region.
If a negative voltage is applied to the gate electrode, the holes in the p-type sub-
strate are attracted to the semiconductor-oxide interface: accumulation (Figure 2.12).
If a small positive voltage is applied to the gate electrode, the oxide electric field
is directed toward the substrate: depletion (Figure 2.13)
VG > 0
(small) Metal (Al) Oxide Semiconductor (Si)
p-type
Ei
Depletion E Fp
qVG
P-type Si substrate region E Fm Ev
VB = 0
FIGURE 2.13 The cross-sectional view and the energy band diagram of the MOS structure
operating in depletion mode, under small gate bias.
The thickness of the depletion region, (Xd ), on the surface is the function of the
surface potential ∅s.
• Mobile hole charge in a thin horizontal layer parallel to the surface is:
dQ = −q ⋅ N A ⋅ dx (2.7)
• Using the Poisson equation, we can find the surface potential change
required to displace this charge sheet dQ by a distance Xd away from the
surface:
dQ q ⋅N A ⋅ x
d∅ s = − x ⋅ = ⋅ dx (2.8)
ε Si ε Si
• Integrating the previous equation, we can find the thickness of the depletion
region:
∅s xd
q ⋅ NA ⋅ x
∫ ∅F
d∅ s =
∫ 0 ε Si
⋅ dx (2.9)
q ⋅ N A ⋅ xd 2
∅ s −∅ F = (2.10)
2ε Si
2ε Si ⋅ ∅ s −∅ F
xd = (2.11)
q ⋅ NA
Devices 13
Q = −q ⋅ N A ⋅x d = − 2q ⋅ N A ⋅ε Si ⋅ ∅ S − ∅ F (2.12)
If we increase the position gate bias, the mid-gap energy level Ei becomes
smaller than the Fermi level EFP. Then the semiconductor in this region
becomes n-type: surface inversion (Figure 2.14).
• The n-type layer near the surface is called the inversion layer
• The inversion layer will be used for the channel of MOSFET devices
Once the surface is inverted, the thickness of the depletion region does not increase
any more even if the positive gate bias is further increased.
We can find the maximum depletion region depth xdm by using the inversion con-
dition ∅ S = −∅ F .
2 ⋅ε Si ⋅ 2∅ F
xdm = (2.13)
q⋅NA
Ei
qVG EFp
Depletion E Fm Ev
P-type Si substrate region
VB = 0
FIGURE 2.14 The cross-sectional view and the energy band diagram of the MOS structure
in surface inversion, under larger gate bias.
14 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
GATE
S
D
CHANNEL
WIDTH
(W)
SUBSTRATE (p-Si)
Types of MOSFETs:
• The source is the n+ (p+) region, which has a lower (higher) potential than
the other n+ (p+) region in an n-channel (p-channel) MOSFET device
• All the terminal voltage of the device is defined with respect to the source
potential
D D D D D D
G B G G G B G G
S S S S S S
4-terminal Simplified Simplified 4-terminal Simplified Simplified
n-channel MOSFET p-channel MOSFET
FIGURE 2.16 Circuit symbols for n-channel and p-channel enhancement type of MOSFETs.
Devices 15
VS = 0 GATE VDS = 0
OXIDE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
VB = 0
• The work function difference between the gate and the channel
• The gate component to change the surface potential
Ec
Ei
φF E Fp
|2φ F| -φ F
qVTO
E Fm Ev
FIGURE 2.18 Band diagram of the MOS structure underneath the gate, at surface inversion.
16 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
GATE VDS = 0
VS = 0
OXIDE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
INVERSION LAYER
(CHANNEL)
DEPLETION REGION
SUBSTRATE (p-Si)
VB = 0
The work function difference ∅ GC between the gate and the channel determines the
built-in potential of the MOS system.
∅ GC =∅ F (substrate) −∅ M (2.14)
Because of the fixed acceptor ions located in the depletion region near the
surface, the depletion charge exists.
QB 0 = − 2q ⋅N A ⋅ε Si ⋅ −2∅ F (2.16)
−QB
The component that offsets the depletion region charge is equal to .
COX
ε ox
COX = (2.18)
tox
There always exists a fixed positive charge density QOX at the interface between the
gate oxide and the silicon substrate.
The gate voltage component that is necessary to offset this positive charge at the
interface is −QOX .
COX
• For zero substrate bias:
QB0 Qox
VT 0 =∅ GC − 2∅ F − − (2.19)
Cox Cox
QB Qox
VT =∅GC − 2∅ F − − (2.20)
Cox Cox
QB 0 Qox QB − QB 0 Q − QB 0
VT =∅GC − 2∅ F − − − =VT 0 − B (2.21)
Cox Cox Cox Cox
QB − QB0
Cox
=−
2q ⋅N A ⋅ε Si
Cox
⋅ ( −2∅ F + VSB − 2∅ F ) (2.23)
2q ⋅ N A ⋅ ε Si
γ= (2.24)
Cox
We can use Equation 2.23 for both the n-channel device and the p-channel device.
However, some of the terms and coefficients in Equation 2.23 have different
polarities for the n-channel case and for the p-channel case.
18 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
The threshold voltage can be made negative. The device has a negative threshold
voltage called a depletion-type (or normally-on) n-channel MOSFET. Except for
this negative threshold voltage, the depletion-type MOSFET has the same electrical
behavior as the enhancement-type device.
• Calculate γ :
1
2 ⋅q ⋅N A ⋅ε Si 2 ⋅1.6 ⋅10 −19 ⋅ 4 ⋅1018 ⋅ 11.7 ⋅8.85 ⋅10 −14
γ= = = 0.52V 2
Cox 2.20 ⋅10 −6
0.80
0.75
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Substrate Bias VSB (V)
• A depleted surface region forms adjacent to the drain and grows toward the
source
• Called saturation mode (or saturation region)
20 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VG > V T
VS = 0 VD
small
ID
OXIDE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
CHANNEL
(a)
VB = 0
VG > VT
VS = 0 VD = VDST
OXIDE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
PINCH-OFF
POINT DEPLETION REGION
SUBSTRATE (p-Si )
(b) VB = 0
VG > VT
VS = 0 VD > VDST
OXIDE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
PINCH-OFF
POINT DEPLETION REGION
SUBSTRATE (p-Si )
(c)
VB = 0
FIGURE 2.21 Cross sectional view of an n-channel (nMOS) transistor, (a) operating in
linear region, (b) operating at the edge of saturation, and (c) operating beyond saturation.
Devices 21
• As with the inversion layer near the drain, the effective channel length is
decreased
• The voltage of channel-end remains constant and equal to VDSAT
• Pinched-off area of the channel absorbs most of the excess voltage drop
(VDS − VDSAT )
• A high-field is generated between the channel-end and the drain boundary
VC ( y = 0 ) = VS = 0
(2.25)
VC ( y = L ) = VDS
It is assumed that the entire channel region between the source and the drain is
inverted:
VGS ≥VT 0
(2.26)
VGD = VGS − VDS ≥ VT 0
Let QI(y) be the total mobile charge in the surface inversion layer.
This charge can be expressed as follows,
dy
dR = − (2.28)
W ⋅ µn ⋅ QI ( y )
Assume that the channel current density is uniform across this segment.
22 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VGS > V TO
VS = 0
ID
OXIDE
VDS
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
x y CHANNEL
y=L
y=0
SUBSTRATE (p-Si) DEPLETION REGION
VB = 0
y=0
Channel length = L y=L
Source end
Channel Width = W
dy Drain end
Inversion layer
(channel)
FIGURE 2.23 Simplified geometry of the surface inversion layer (channel region).
Applying the Ohm’s law for this segment, we can write the voltage drop along
segment dy in the y-direction as follows,
ID
dVC = I D ⋅dR = − ⋅dy (2.29)
W ⋅µn ⋅ QI ( y )
Devices 23
L VDS
∫ 0
I D ⋅dR = −W ⋅ µn ⋅
∫ 0
QI ( y ) ⋅ dVC (2.30)
We can simplify the left-hand side of Equation 2.30 and replace QI ( y ) with
Equation 2.27.
VDS
I D ⋅L = W ⋅µn ⋅ COX
∫ 0
( VGS − VC − VT 0 ) ⋅ dVC (2.31)
Assuming that the channel voltage VC is only variable, and it depends on the posi-
tion y:
µn ⋅ COX W
ID = ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT 0 ) VDS − VDS 2 (2.32)
2 L
k′ W
ID = ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT 0 ) VDS − VDS 2 (2.33)
2 L
k
I D = ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT 0 ) VDS − VDS 2 (2.34)
2
where:
k′ = µn ⋅ COX (2.35)
and
W
k = k′ ⋅ (2.36)
L
We can find out that the drain current Equation 2.32 is not valid beyond the bound-
ary between the linear region and the saturation region, i.e., for,
And we can see that the drain current remains approximately constant around the
peak value reached for beyond the saturation boundary. This saturation current level
can be found simply as follows,
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( sat ) = ⋅ ⋅ 2 (VGS − VT 0 ) ⋅ (VGS −VT 0 ) (VGS − VT 0 )
2
2 L
(2.38)
µ ⋅C W
= n OX ⋅ ⋅ (VGS −VT 0 ) .
2
2 L
24 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Linear Region
VGS3
Drain Current Saturation Region
VGS2
VGS1
Drain Voltage
D +
V DS
G B
Drain Current
+ S
VGS
VTO
Gate Voltage
FIGURE 2.25 Drain current of the n-channel MOS transistor as a function of the gate-
source voltage VGS, with VDS > VDSAT.
Thus, drain current, beyond the saturation boundary, is a function of VGS only.
Figures 2.24 and 2.25 show the basic current-voltage characteristics.
The inversion layer charge at the drain end of the channel is,
QI ( y = L ) ≈ 0 (2.42)
L′ = L − ∆L (2.43)
VC ( y = L′ ) = VDSAT (2.44)
VGS > V TO
VS = 0 V DS > VDST
OXIDE ID
0 y L’ L L
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
CHANNEL
PINCH-OFF
SUBSTRATE (p-Si ) POINT (Q1 = 0) DEPLETION REGION
VB = 0
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( sat ) = ⋅ ⋅ (VGS −VT 0 )
2
(2.45)
2 L′
Equation 2.45 corresponds to a MOSFET with an effective channel length Lʹ, operat-
ing in the saturation region. This phenomenon, shortening of the effective channel, is
called channel length modulation (CLM). As Lʹ decreases with the increasing VDS, the
saturation current ID(sat) will also increase with VDS. We can modify Equation 2.45
to reflect this drain voltage dependence,
1 µ ⋅C W
I D ( sat ) = ⋅ n OX ⋅ ⋅ (VGS −VT 0 )
2
(2.46)
∆L 2 L
1−
L
The channel length shortening ∆L is proportional to the square root of ( VDS − VDSAT ),
Assuming that λ ⋅VDS << 1, the saturation current given in Equation 2.45 can be
written as:
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( sat ) = ⋅ ⋅ ( VGS − VT 0 ) ⋅ (1 + λ ⋅VDS )
2
(2.49)
2 L
Figure 2.27 shows the effect of CLM. The drain current in the saturation region
increases linearly with VDS instead of remaining constant.
VSB = 0.
Linear Region
VGS3
Drain Current
Saturation Region
with channel
length modulation
(λ≠0)
neglecting channel VGS2
length modulation
(λ=0)
VGS1
Drain Voltage
We can replace the threshold voltage terms with the more general V T (VSB) terms.
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( lin ) = ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT ( VSB ) ) VDS − V 2 DS (2.51)
2 L
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( lin ) = ⋅ ⋅ ( VGS − VT ( VSB ) ) ⋅ (1 + λ ⋅VDS )
2
(2.52)
2 L
Figure 2.28 depicts the terminal voltages and current of the NMOS and the PMOS.
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( lin ) = ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) VDS − V 2 DS for VGS ≥ VT and VDS < VGS − VT (2.55)
2 L
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( sat ) = ⋅ ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) ⋅ (1 + λ ⋅ VDS ) for VGS ≥ VT andd VDS ≥ VGS − VT (2.56)
2
2 L
D S
+ V - +
DS
VGS V SB
ID
+ -
G B G B
+ -
VGS V SB ID
- + +
S D VDS
n-channel MOSFET p-channel MOSFET
FIGURE 2.28 Terminal voltages and currents of the nMOS and the pMOS.
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( lin ) = ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) VDS − V 2 DS for VGS ≤ VT andd VDS > VGS − VT (2.58)
2 L
µn ⋅ COX W
I D ( sat ) = ⋅ ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) ⋅ (1 + λ ⋅ VDS ) for VGS ≤ VT andd VDS ≤ VGS − VT
2
(2.59)
2 L
2.4.2 MOSFET Scaling
The very large-scale integration (VLSI) technology requires a high packing den-
sity and small transistor size. The reduction of the size is commonly referred to as
scaling. There are two types of scaling strategies: (1) full scaling (constant-field
scaling) and (2) constant-voltage scaling. Primed quantities in Figure 2.29 indicate
the scaled dimensions and doping density. The scaling of all dimensions by a fac-
tor of S > 1 leads to the reduction of the area occupied by the transistor by factor
of S2.
GATE
S
D
W’ = W / S
OXIDE t ox’ = t ox / S
ND’ = ND ND’ = ND
Xj’ = Xj / S
L’ = L / S
ε ox ε
′ =
Cox = S ox = S ⋅Cox (2.60)
′
tox tox
The aspect ratio W/L of the MOSFET will remain unchanged under the scaling.
The transconductance parameter kn will also be scaled by a factor of S.
The linear-mode drain current of the scaled MOSFET can be found as:
kn′
I′D ( lin ) = ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS
′ − VT′ ) ⋅ VDS
′ − V ′DS
2
2
S ⋅ kn 1
= ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) ⋅ VDS − V 2 DS
2 S2
I D ( lin )
= (2.61)
S
The saturation-mode drain current is also reduced by the same scaling factor,
kn′
I D′ ( sat ) = ⋅ (VGS
′ −VT′ )
2
S ⋅kn′ 1 I D ( sat )
⋅ 2 ⋅ (VGS −VT ) =
2
= (2.62)
2 S S
TABLE 2.1
Full Scaling of MOSFET Dimensions, Potentials,
and Doping Densities
Quantity Before Scaling After Scaling
Channel length L Lʹ = L/S
Channel width W Wʹ = W/S
Gate oxide thickness tox tʹox = tox /S
Junction depth Xj Xʹj = Xj/S
Power supply voltage VDD VʹDD = VDD/S
Threshold voltage VT0 VʹT0 = VT0/S
Doping density NA NʹA = S ∙ NA
ND NʹD = S ∙ ND
30 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
The power dissipation of the MOSFET before scaling can be written as follows,
P = I D ⋅VDS (2.63)
1 P
P′ = I D′ ⋅VDS
′ = ⋅ I D ⋅VDS = 2 (2.64)
S2 S
Scaling of the voltage (full scaling) may not be very practical in many cases.
The effects of full scaling are depicted in Table 2.2.
kn′
I′D ( lin ) = ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS
′ − VT′ ) ⋅VDS
′ − V ′DS
2
2
S ⋅kn
= ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) ⋅VDS − V 2 DS = S ⋅ I D ( lin ) (2.65)
2
kn′ S ⋅kn
I′D ( sat ) = ⋅ ( VGS
′ − VT′ ) = ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) = S ⋅ I D ( sat )
2 2
(2.66)
2 2
This is seen in Table 2.4. The power dissipation of the MOSFET increases by a fac-
tor of S,
′ = ( S ⋅I D ) ⋅ VDS = S ⋅P
P′ = I′D ⋅ VDS (2.67)
TABLE 2.2
Effects of Full Scaling Upon Key Device Characteristics
Quantity Before Scaling After Scaling
Oxide capacitance COX CʹOX = S ∙ COX
Drain current ID IʹD = ID/S
Power dissipation P Pʹ = P/S²
Power density P/Area Pʹ/Areaʹ = P/Area
Devices 31
TABLE 2.3
Constant-Voltage Scaling of MOSFET Dimensions,
Potentials, and Doping Densities
Quantity Before Scaling After Scaling
Dimensions W, L, tox, Xj Reduced by S
Voltages VDD, VT Remain unchanged
Doping densities NA, ND Increased by S²
TABLE 2.4
Effects of Constant-Voltage Scaling Upon Key Device
Characteristics
Quantity Before Scaling After Scaling
Oxide capacitance Cox CʹOX = S ∙ COX
Drain current ID IʹD = S ∙ ID
Power dissipation P Pʹ = S ∙ P
Power density P/Area Pʹ/Areaʹ = S3 ∙ (P/Area)
W V −V V
ID = I D 0exp GS TH 1 − exp − DS (2.68)
L nVT VT
where W = gate width, L = gate length, I D0 = drain current when gate-source volt-
age equals threshold voltage, VGS = gate-source voltage, VTH = threshold voltage,
n = ratio of the sum of gate-oxide capacitance and depletion-region capacitance
over gate-oxide capacitance, VT = thermal voltage, and VDS = drain-source voltage.
The drain current plotted from weak to strong inversion is shown in Figure 2.30 [4].
2.4.4 Short-Channel
Short-channel device:
Log I D
Exponential region
of weak inversion
(subthreshold
biasing) Square-law region
of strong inversion
VTH VGS
FIGURE 2.30 Plot of log I D against VGS showing the exponential region of subthreshold
biasing and the square-law I D − VGS relationship in strong inversion. (Redrawn from
Razavi, B., Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, McGraw-Hill Education, New York,
2001.)
µno µno
µn ( eff ) = = (2.69)
1 +Θ ⋅ E x 1 + Θε ox ⋅ V −V y
toxε Si
( GS C ( ) )
where µno is the low-field surface electron mobility, and 𝛩 is an empirical factor.
Equation 2.69 can be approximated by:
µno
µn ( eff ) = (2.70)
1 +η ⋅ (VGS −VT )
The lateral electric field Ey, along with the channel, increases, as the effective chan-
nel length decreases. Drift velocity tends to saturate at high electric fields. This is
seen in Figure 2.31.
Vsat
7
10
s
Vd (cm/s)
on
ctr
Ele
les
Ho
n
p
=µ
=µ
pe
pe
Slo
Slo
E c,n E c,p
Electric Field Ey ( V/cm)
1.0 7
Vsat
Model1 Model3 10
Model2
0.8 (electrons α = 2)
Vd (cm/s)
ons
Vdrift / Vsat
ctr
0.6
Ele
les
0.4
= µ Ho
Model 2
n
p
=µ
(holes α = 1)
0.2
pe
pe
Slo
Slo
0
0 1 2 3 4 E c,n E c,p
Ey/Ec Electric Field Ey ( V/cm)
Ey
vd = µn ( eff ) ⋅ for E y < Ec (2.71)
E
1+ y
Ec
2.4.4.2 VDSAT
At the boundary of saturation and linear regions, the drain-source voltage of the
MOS transistor is VDSAT and ID(lin) = ID(sat).
34 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VDSAT =
( VGS − VT ) ⋅ EC L (2.73)
( VGS − VT ) + EC L
Saturation current equation can be rewritten as:
(VGS −VT )
2
µ C W EC L ⋅ (VGS −VT )
2
= n OX ⋅ ⋅ (2.75)
2 L (VGS −VT ) + EC L
µn ⋅ COX W 1
I D ( lin ) = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ 2 ⋅ ( VGS − VT ) ⋅ VDS − V 2 DS (2.77)
2 L VDS
1+
EC L
(VGS −VT ) ⋅ 1 + λ ⋅V
2
µ P ⋅ COX W 1
I D ( lin ) =
2
⋅
L
⋅
VSD
( )
⋅ 2 ⋅ VSG − VT ⋅ VSD − V 2 SD
(2.79)
1+
EC L
(VSG − VT ) ⋅(1 + λ ⋅V )
2
2.4.5 MOSFET Capacitor
As seen in Figure 2.33, the channel length is given by:
L = LM − 2 ⋅ LD (2.81)
1. Oxide-related capacitance
2. Junction capacitance
LD LD
GATE
(n +) (n +) W
GATE
tox DRAIN
SOURCE OXIDE
(n +) (n +)
(p +) L Xj (p+)
SUBSTRATE (p-Si )
With
ε OX
COX = (2.83).
tOX
Capacitances which result from the interaction between the gate voltage and the chan-
nel charge are Cgs, Cgd, and Cgb. Figure 2.34 shows the representation of MOSFET
oxide capacitances during cut-off, linear and saturation modes.
• Cut-off mode:
• The surface is not inverted
• No conducting channel between source and drain, so Cgs = Cgd = 0
• The gate-to-substrate capacitance can be approximated by:
• Linear mode:
• The inverted channel extends across the MOSFET
• Conducting inversion layer shields the substrate from the gate electric
field: Cgb = 0
• The distributed gate-to-channel capacitance (equal S, D):
1
Cgs ≅ Cgd ≅ ⋅ COX ⋅ W ⋅ L (2.85)
2
• Saturation mode:
• The inversion region is pinched off
• The gate-to-drain capacitance component is equal to zero, Cgd = 0
• Source still linked to the conducting channel. Shielding effect still remains:
Cgb = 0
• The distributed gate-to-channel capacitance as seen between the gate and
the source can be approximated by:
2
Cgs ≅ ⋅ COX ⋅ W ⋅ L (2.86)
3
Devices 37
GATE
(n+) (n+)
GATE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
CHANNEL
GATE
SOURCE DRAIN
(n+) (n+)
CHANNEL
(c) SUBSTRATE (p-Si)
FIGURE 2.34 MOSFET oxide capacitances during (a) cut-off, (b) linear, and (c) saturation
modes.
TABLE 2.5
Lists a Summary of the Approximate Oxide Capacitance Values
Capacitance Cut-off Linear Saturation
Cgb (total) COXWL 0 0
Cgd (total) COXWLD 1/2COXWL + COXWLD COXWLD
Cgs (total) COXWLD 1/2COXWL + COXWLD 2/3COXWL + COXWLD
1
Cgb
Cgs
2/3
1/2
Cgd
VT VT + VDS
Gate-to-source Voltage (VGS)
2 ⋅ ε Si N A + N D
xd = ⋅ ⋅ ( ∅0 − V ) (2.87)
q NA ⋅ ND
kT N ⋅ N
∅0 = ⋅ ln A 2 D (2.88)
q ni
Devices 39
Gate Oxide
Y
2 Xj
1
5 3
Channel 4
Source and
Drain Diffusion
Regions
Junction Area Type
1 W · xj n+ / p
2 Y · xj n+ / p+
3 W · xj n+ / p+
4 Y · xj n+ / p+
5 W · xj n+ / p
N ⋅ ND NA − ND
Q j = A ⋅ q ⋅ A ⋅ xd = A 2 ⋅ε Si ⋅ q ⋅ N + N ⋅ ( ∅ 0 − V ) (2.89)
NA + ND A D
• The junction capacitance associated with the depletion region is defined as:
dQj
Cj = (2.90)
dV
• By differentiating Equation 2.89, we can obtain the expression for the junc-
tion capacitance as follows,
ε Si ⋅ q N A ⋅ N D 1
Cj (V ) = A ⋅ ⋅ (2.91)
2 N A + N D ∅0 − V
40 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
A ⋅Cj0
Cj (V ) = m
(2.92)
V
1 − ∅
0
• The zero-bias junction capacitance per unit area Cj0 is defined as:
ε Si ⋅ q N A ⋅ N D 1
Cj0 = ⋅ ⋅ (2.93)
2 N A + N D ∅ 0
∆Q Qj ( V2 ) − Qj ( V1 ) 1 V2
Ceq =
∆V
=
V2 − V1
=
V2 − V1
⋅
∫ V1
C j ( V ) ⋅ dV (2.94)
2 ⋅ A ⋅ C j 0 ⋅∅ 0
1− m 1−m
V V
Ceq = − ⋅ 1 − 2 − 1 − 1 (2.95)
(V2 −V1 ) (1 − m ) ∅0 ∅0
2 ⋅ A⋅C j 0 ⋅∅ 0 V V
Ceq = − ⋅ 1− 2 − 1− 1 (2.96)
(V2 −V1 ) ∅0 ∅0
Keq = −
2 ∅0
V2 − V1
⋅ ( ∅ 0 − V2 − ∅ 0 − V1 ) (2.98)
2.4.7 Noise
2.4.7.1 Thermal Noise
Thermal noise is, in general, associated with the random motion of particles in a
force-free environment. Since the mean available energy per degree of freedom
is proportional to temperature, the resulting noise is referred to as thermal noise.
The thermal noise of a resistor is shown in Figure 2.37.
V 2 n = 4kTR ( ∆f )
4kT
I 2n = , if R = 50, T = 300 K, So Vn = 0.91 nV/√ Hz.
R
Sv ( f )
R 4kTR
Noiseless − +
Resistor f
Noiseless
R
Resistor
=4
(a) S
+
, -
RD
,
R1
+ -
RS
,
-
+
(b)
D
+ +∙∙∙ + =
(c) S
FIGURE 2.39 Ohmic noise of transistor. (a) The layout of a MOSFET indicating gate,
source and drain resistances; (b) circuit model with thermal noises; and (c) distributed gate
resistance.
K 1
V 2n =
Cox WL f
2 K 1 K 3
4kT gm ≈ gm2 , so f c ≈ gm , app. for long channel.
3 CoxWL f c CoxWL 8kT
Devices 43
Polysilicon
SiO2
Dangling
Bonds
Silicon
Crystal
20 log
1 Corner
Thermal
f
fC
WT WS K S (VGS , S − VT , S )
= (2.99)
LT LS KT (VGS ,T − VT ,T )
WT WS
= C (2.100)
LT LS
44 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
where:
KS ( VGS,S − VT ,S )
C=
KT ( VGS,T − VT ,T )
FIGURE 2.42 I D versus VDS curve for the NMOS transistor with different VGS in the 150 nm.
Devices 45
FIGURE 2.43 Fitting of I D versus VDS curve with different W size in the 90 nm to W/L size
of 6/3 in the 150 nm.
technology has the almost same characteristic with NMOS W/L size of 2.1/2 in the
90 nm process technology.
Next, the PMOS scale-down ratio will be discussed as follows. The initial width
of the transistor is set to 13 µm, and the length of the transistor is set to 3 µm. The I D
versus VDS curve with different VGS voltages of 0 V, 1 V, 1.5 V, 2 V, and 3.3 V is plot-
ted by simulation with sweeping VDS from 0 V to 3.3 V. Same as the first method,
the standard source (150 nm) W/L size that is commonly used for the initial process
porting is W = 13 µm and L = 3 µm. Figure 2.44 shows the I D versus VDS curve for
the PMOS transistor with different VGS in the 150 nm process technology with the
PMOS transistor size of W = 13 µm and L = 3 µm.
In this case, the same as with the NMOS conversion, the PMOS gate-to-source
voltage, VGS, is fixed to 1.5 V as a reference to start the fitting, with the reference size
FIGURE 2.44 I D versus VDS curve for the PMOS transistor with different VGS in the 150 nm.
46 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
FIGURE 2.45 Fitting of I D versus VDS curve with different W size in the 90 nm to W/L size
of 6/3 in 150 nm.
to get to the scale-down ratio between the 90 nm and 150 nm process technology.
In the 90 nm process technology, the length of the PMOS transistor, L, is fixed to
2 µm, and then the different NMOS transistor width is simulated and plotted with
the I D versus VDS curve. Figure 2.45 shows that the I D versus VDS curve with the dif-
ferent transistor width, W, compares to the PMOS transistor size of W = 13 µm and
L = 3 µm in the 150 nm process technology.
Figure 2.45 shows that the W/L size of 3.8/2 is closer to the black line, which is
W/L size of 13/3. It shows that the PMOS W/L size of 13/3 in the 150 nm process
technology has the almost same characteristic with the PMOS W/L size of 3.8/2 in
the 90 nm process technology.
TABLE 2.6
BSIM3 Models for American Microsystem Inc (AMI) Semiconductor’s C5
Process
* BSIM3 models for AMI semiconductor’s C5 process
*
* Don’t forget the options scale=300nm if using drawn lengths
* and the MOSIS SUBM design rules
*
* 2<Ldrawn<500 10<Wdrawn<10000 Vdd=5V
* Note minimum L is 0.6 um while minimum W is 3 um
* Change to level=49 when using HSPICE
.MODEL NMOS_L NMOS ( LEVEL = 8
+VERSION = 3.1 TNOM = 27 TOX = 1.39E-8
+XJ = 1.5E-7 NCH = 1.7E17 VTH0 = 0.6696061
+K1 = 0.8351612 K2 = −0.0839158 K3 = 23.1023856
+K3B = −7.6841108 W0 = 1E-8 NLX = 1E-9
+DVT0W =0 DVT1W =0 DVT2W =0
+DVT0 = 2.9047241 DVT1 = 0.4302695 DVT2 = −0.134857
+U0 = 458.439679 UA = 1E-13 UB = 1.485499E-18
+UC = 1.629939E-11 VSAT = 1.643993E5 A0 = 0.6103537
+AGS = 0.1194608 B0 = 2.674756E-6 B1 = 5E-6
+KETA = −2.640681E-3 A1 = 8.219585E-5 A2 = 0.3564792
+RDSW = 1.387108E3 PRWG = 0.0299916 PRWB = 0.0363981
+WR =1 WINT = 2.472348E-7 LINT = 3.597605E-8
+XL =0 XW =0 DWG = −1.287163E-8
+DWB = 5.306586E-8 VOFF =0 NFACTOR = 0.8365585
+CIT =0 CDSC = 2.4E-4 CDSCD =0
+CDSCB =0 ETA0 = 0.0246738 ETAB = −1.406123E-3
+DSUB = 0.2543458 PCLM = 2.5945188 PDIBLC1 = −0.4282336
+PDIBLC2 = 2.311743E-3 PDIBLCB = −0.0272914 DROUT = 0.7283566
+PSCBE1 = 5.598623E8 PSCBE2 = 5.461645E-5 PVAG =0
+DELTA = 0.01 RSH = 81.8 MOBMOD =1
+PRT = 8.621 UTE = −1 KT1 = −0.2501
+KT1L = −2.58E-9 KT2 =0 UA1 = 5.4E-10
+UB1 = −4.8E-19 UC1 = −7.5E-11 AT = 1E5
+WL =0 WLN =1 WW =0
+WWN =1 WWL =0 LL =0
+LLN =1 LW =0 LWN =1
+LWL =0 CAPMOD = 2 XPART = 0.5
(Continued)
48 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
TABLE 2.7
Customized Predictive Technology Model (PTM) 45 PMOS
* Customized PTM 45 PMOS
.model PMOS_S pmos level = 54
+version = 4.0 binunit = 1 paramchk= 1 mobmod = 0
+capmod = 2 igcmod = 1 igbmod = 1 geomod = 1
+diomod = 1 rdsmod = 0 rbodymod= 1 rgatemod= 1
+permod = 1 acnqsmod= 0 trnqsmod= 0
* parameters related to the technology node
+tnom = 27 epsrox = 3.9
+eta0 = 0.0049 nfactor = 2.1 wint = 5e-09
+cgso = 1.1e-10 cgdo = 1.1e-10 xl = −2e-08
* parameters customized by the user
+toxe = 1.85e-09 toxp = 1.1e-09 toxm = 1.85e-09 toxref = 1.85e-09
+dtox = 7.5e-10 lint = 3.75e-09
+vth0 = −0.423 k1 = 0.491 u0 = 0.00432 vsat = 70000
+rdsw = 155 ndep = 2.54e+18 xj = 1.4e-08
*secondary parameters
+ll =0 wl =0 lln =1 wln =1
+lw =0 ww =0 lwn =1 wwn =1
+lwl =0 wwl =0 xpart =0
+k2 = −0.01 k3 =0
+k3b =0 w0 = 2.5e-006 dvt0 =1 dvt1 =2
+dvt2 = −0.032 dvt0w =0 dvt1w =0 dvt2w =0
+dsub = 0.1 minv = 0.05 voffl =0 dvtp0 = 1e-009
+dvtp1 = 0.05 lpe0 =0 lpeb =0
+ngate = 2e+020 nsd = 2e+020 phin =0
+cdsc = 0.000 cdscb =0 cdscd =0 cit =0
+voff = −0.126 etab =0
+vfb = 0.55 ua = 2.0e-009 ub = 0.5e-018
+uc =0 a0 = 1.0 ags = 1e-020
+a1 =0 a2 =1 b0 = −1e-020 b1 =0
+keta = −0.047 dwg =0 dwb =0 pclm = 0.12
+pdiblc1 = 0.001 pdiblc2 = 0.001 pdiblcb = 3.4e-008 drout = 0.56
+pvag = 1e-020 delta = 0.01 pscbe1 = 8.14e+008 pscbe2 = 9.58e-007
+fprout = 0.2 pdits = 0.08 pditsd = 0.23 pditsl = 2.3e+006
+rsh =5 rsw = 85 rdw = 85
+rdswmin = 0 rdwmin =0 rswmin =0 prwg = 3.22e-008
+prwb = 6.8e-011 wr =1 alpha0 = 0.074 alpha1 = 0.005
+beta0 = 30 agidl = 0.0002 bgidl = 2.1e+009 cgidl = 0.0002
+egidl = 0.8
+aigbacc = 0.012 bigbacc = 0.0028 cigbacc = 0.002
+nigbacc =1 aigbinv = 0.014 bigbinv = 0.004 cigbinv = 0.004
+eigbinv = 1.1 nigbinv =3 aigc = 0.69 bigc = 0.0012
+cigc = 0.0008 aigsd = 0.0087 bigsd = 0.0012 cigsd = 0.0008
+nigc =1 poxedge =1 pigcd =1 ntox =1
(Continued)
50 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
TABLE 2.8
Summary of Device Characteristics for the Long-Channel CMOS Process
Supply Voltage (VDD) = 5 V Minimum L = 0.5 μm NMOS in Inversion (Saturation):
KPn W
Parameter NMOS PMOS Notes ID = (VGS − VTHN )2 (1 + λ nVds )
2 L
W W
VTHN and VTHP 700 mV 900 mV Typical gm = KPn (VGS − VTHN ) = 2 KPn ID
L L
1
KPn and KPp 100 μA/V2 45 μA/V2 tox = 139 A ro =
λ n I DSAT
ε ox ε ox
′
= Cox 2.5 fF/μm2 2.5 fF/μm2 Cox = WL ⋅ (scale)2
tox tox
Note: VSG = 1.25 V, PMOS W/L = 20/2, VGS = 1.01 V, NMOS W/L = 10/2, Id = 20 μA.
CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Devices
TABLE 2.9
Summary of Device Characteristics for the Short-Channel CMOS Process
NMOS in Inversion (Saturation):
VDD = 1 V Minimum L = 45 nm Overdrive voltage, Vov = VGS − VTHN
VTHN and VTHP 330 mV 390 mV Typical (lower than the model parameter) ′
gm = vsatnWCox
1
vsatn and vsatp 147 × 103 m/s 70 × 103 m/s PTM Model ro =
λ n I DSAT
ε ox 20 fF/μm2 19 fF/μm2 ε ox 2
′
= Cox Cox = WL ⋅ ( scale )
tox tox = 17.5 A tox = 18.5 A tox
λn and λp 0.25 V−1 0.25 V−1 At L = 100 nm
VDSsatn and VDSsatp 50 mV 50 mV Vov = VGS − VTHN [VGS = 400 mV]
Vovn and Vovp 70 mV 70 mV
Note: VSG = 0.46 V, PMOS W/L = 5 μm/100 nm, VSG = 0.4 V, NMOS W/L = 2.5 μm/100 nm, Id = 10 μA.
Overdrive is ~5%VDD (1 V).
53
54 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
3.0x10-3
2.5x10-3
2.0x10-3
Id (A)
1.5x10-3
1.0x10-3
5.0x10-4
0.0
0 2 4
(a) Vds (V)
2.0x10-4
0.0
-2.0x10-4
-4.0x10-4
-6.0x10-4
Id (A)
-8.0x10-4
-1.0x10-3
-1.2x10-3
-1.4x10-3
-1.6x10-3
0 2 4
(b) Vsd (V)
FIGURE 2.46 IV curves: (a) NMOS 0.5 μm, (b) PMOS 0.5 μm. (Continued)
Devices 55
-4
5.5x10
-4
5.0x10
-4
4.5x10
-4
4.0x10
-4
3.5x10
Id (A)
-4
3.0x10
-4
2.5x10
-4
2.0x10
-4
1.5x10
-4
1.0x10
-5
5.0x10
0.0
-5
-5.0x10
0.0 0.5 1.0
(c) Vds (V)
-6
5.0x10
0.0
-6
-5.0x10
-5
-1.0x10
-5
-1.5x10
-5
-2.0x10
-5
-2.5x10
-5
-3.0x10
-5
-3.5x10
Id (A)
-5
-4.0x10
-5
-4.5x10
-5
-5.0x10
-5
-5.5x10
-5
-6.0x10
-5
-6.5x10
-5
-7.0x10
-5
-7.5x10
-5
-8.0x10
-5
-8.5x10
-5
-9.0x10
0.0 0.5 1.0
(d) Vsd (V)
FIGURE 2.46 (Continued) IV curves: (c) NMOS 45 nm, and (d) PMOS 45 nm.
56 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
-4
4.0x10
Id (A)
-4
2.0x10
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
(a) Vgs (V)
0.0
Id (A)
-4
-1.0x10
-4
-2.0x10
0 1 2
(b) VSG (V)
FIGURE 2.47 Threshold and body effect: (a) NMOS 0.5 μm, (b) PMOS 0.5 μm.
(Continued)
Devices 57
-4
3.0x10
-4
2.0x10
Id (A)
-4
1.0x10
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0.0
Id (A)
-5
-2.0x10
-5
-4.0x10
FIGURE 2.47 (Continued) Threshold and body effect: (c) NMOS 45 nm, and (d) PMOS
45 nm.
58 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Using Tables 2.8 and 2.9, the current can be estimated. From Figure 2.46c and d,
the on current for the NMOS is = 500 µA/(W · scale) = 500 µA/µm, and for PMOS
is = 80 µA/(W · scale) = 80 µA/µm.
2.8 SUMMARY
The understanding of the devices is essentially important in circuit design. Even
though this chapter focuses only on CMOS devices, such as MOSFET and photo
devices, it should be treated as a method to understand a device. Photo devices are
considered “sensor” devices, which in the future, other devices could be integrated
into the standard CMOS process or technology. A simple exercise on how to deter-
mine the MOSFET parameter is also explained in this chapter. Knowing both device
physic and modeling is undeniable crucial for the next chapters. Without a thorough
understanding of the device, one may find difficulties in designing a circuit.
Devices 59
REFERENCES
1. Ardeshirpour, Y., Deen, M. J., and Shirani, S. (2004). 2-D CMOS based image sensor
system for fluorescent detection. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer
Engineering, IEEE (pp. 1441–1444).
2. Scheffer, D., Dierickx, B., and Meynants, G. (1997). Random addressable 2048 × 2048
active pixel image sensor. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 44(10), 1716–1720.
3. Lulé, T., Benthien, S., Keller, H., Mütze, F., Rieve, P., Seibel, K., and Böhm, M. (2000).
Sensitivity of CMOS based imagers and scaling perspectives. IEEE Transactions on
Electron Devices, 47(11), 2110–2122.
4. Razavi, B. (2001). Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. New York: McGraw-
Hill Education.
3 Amplifiers
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides a brief introduction to the basic complementary metal-oxide
semiconductor (CMOS) amplifier, in particular, the two-stage CMOS amplifier.
This chapter use the signal path as design insight. A new technique called the cur-
rent density approach is also discussed in the last part of this chapter.
3.2.1 Theory
The maximum input voltage must not make the input transistor, as in Figure 3.2,
move into a linear region mode.
61
62 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
M11 M13
30/5 30/5 30/5 30/5
90/5
M18
100/2 100/2 100/2 100/2
40/2 40/2 M12 M14
M16
10/5 10/5 M15 20/3
Current mirror as 20/3
ac ve load
Current mirror 2
VDD VDD
IN+
IN -
M12 M14
M15
M16
3.2.2 Example
For the circuit as shown in Figure 3.3, if VI1 is varied from 0 to 1.8 V (VI2 is fixed
at 0.9 V), the drain current of both transistors is shown in Figure 3.4. The character-
istics of the drain current have indicated that there is a working range of differential
voltage for the differential amplifier. Ideally, both transistors should turn ON when
Amplifiers 63
VDD
VI1 M1 M2 VI2
ISS
they are working as a differential amplifier; therefore, the limit of the range of the
differential amplifier is the applied input voltage, which would turn OFF one of the
transistor pair.
If that is the case, when one of the transistors is OFF, the applied Vgs is therefore
either very high of I ds = 2WL Cox µn (Vgs − Vt )2, so Vgs = Vt + WC2oxLµn I ds , or if the input
(
differential voltage is Vid = Vgs1 − Vgs 2, then we have Vid = WC2oxLµn I ds1 − I ds 2 . )
The maximum input differential voltage is found by setting Ids1 = Iss and Ids2 = 0 ,
therefore:
2 LI ss 2 LI ss
Vidmax = or (3.2)
WCox µn WKPn
Exercise:
Given KPn is 120 μA/V2
Based on Figure 3.3, calculate, VI1min and VI1max.
If both P-type metal-oxide semiconductor (PMOS) folded and N-type metal-
oxide semiconductor (NMOS) folded are employed at the input, what will be the
input voltage range?
64 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
-IN
OUT
Signal Phase
FIGURE 3.5 Signal path of the CMOS amplifier (based on Figure 3.1).
Amplifiers 65
As the standard CS amplifier has high gain, the Miller effect will increase the total
input capacitance. Any capacitance between output and input can be seen as capaci-
tance at the input to the ground with the multiplication of (1 + Gain).
3.3.2 Load
There are basically two types of active load: diode-connected MOS or current source
MOS.
Figure 3.6 shows the output stage with a current source as the load.
Figure 3.7 shows the curve of the active load and M1 IV curve. Due to Vgs of the
active load is fixed, thus we have only one curve.
The current source load small signal resistance value is ro = 1/λId, where Id is drain
current. While the diode-connected load small signal resistance is 1/gm.
The low frequency or direct current (DC) gain,
• Buffer configuration is a severe test for instability (you need to have a big-
ger compensation capacitor)
• It cannot drive a small load resistor.
Output resistance and capacitance typically will affect the output stage. The f3dB,
dominant pole.
1
f3dB = (3.4)
2π ( roM18 / / roM17 ) CL
M1
IDS
I vs V (M1)
Active load
(a) VDS
IDS I vs V (active
load)
VDS
(b)
FIGURE 3.7 Curve of the (a) active load and (b) M1 IV curve.
Gain enhancement techniques, such as regulating the drain node, which can increase
the output resistance can be used to increase the gain [1].
The pole is similar to a simple RC pole, each node would have a pole.
3.3.4 Example
Figure 3.9 depicts the amplifier with a simple current source as the load.
Figures 3.10–3.12 show the simulation results of the amplifier with a simple cur-
rent source as the load.
Figure 3.13 shows the amplifier with a cascode current source as the load.
Amplifiers 67
M1 M3
100/2 100/2
0.4
M2 M4
10/5 0.7V 10/5
VDD
M14 V1 V1 M12
M13 V1 V1 M1
Vbias2
Vin+ M2 M3 Vin- M16 M15
Vbias3
M6 M4
M11 M9
Vbias4
M7 M5
VDD
M14 V1 V1 M12
M13 V1 V1 M1
Vbias2
Vin+ M2 M3 Vin- M16 M15
Vout
Vbias3
M6 M4 M8 M10
Vbias4
M7 M5 M11 M9
Figure 3.14 describes the output resistance of the simulated amplifier. The output
resistance is higher than the simple current source’s resistance.
If the differential amplifier is a single-ended drive of signal (transient), the output
currents of both outputs are sometimes not the same. For the current source, Iss, M1
and M2 play significant roles.
The offset voltage of the amplifier, shown in Equation 3.6, resulting from mis-
matches in threshold voltage, load resistance, etc., see Figure 3.15a and b.
+ Vout
-
Vin
Vref
(a)
Vout
Vin
(b) VI Vref
FIGURE 3.15 (a) Input offset simulation configuration and (b) input offset simulation
results.
Amplifiers 71
+
Vout
-
Vin
(a)
Vout
Vin
(b)
Input voltage range
FIGURE 3.16 (a) Input voltage range simulation configuration and (b) input voltage range
simulation result.
VDD
M14 V1 V1 M12
M13 V1 V1 M1
Vbias3
M6 M4 M8 M10
Vbias4
M11
M7 M5 M9
FIGURE 3.17 Folded CMOS amplifier with input voltage range configuration.
72 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
I(vdd)
-0.00013
-0.00014
I(A)
-0.00015
-0.00016
V(vout)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
V(V)
V(vin)
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0
vp (V)
Vcc
A I
+
-
Vin
(a)
Vin
I
Icc
o
(b) Vin
FIGURE 3.19 (a) Current consumption simulation configuration and (b) current consump-
tion simulation result.
Amplifiers 73
Product of 1/f T and low frequency gain is approximately equal to settling time [1].
R2
R1
+
Vout(ac)
-
R3
Vin ac ~
R4
Vac
(a) o
CMRR
(dB) Very bad due to
high frequency
-90 effect
(b) freq
FIGURE 3.20 (a) CMRR simulation configuration and (b) CMRR simulation result.
74 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
~ ac input (Vin)
Vcc
+ Vout
– Vcc
DC Vref
(a) 0
( )
Vout
Vin
PSSR
(dB)
-90
FIGURE 3.21 (a) PSSR simulation configuration and (b) PSSR simulation result.
+
Vout
Vin = -
Big
signal
(a)
Vout
90%
Vout
10% Vin
Slew
Rate TSettling
(b) Time
FIGURE 3.22 (a) Slew rate and settling time simulation configuration and (b) slew rate and
settling time simulation result.
Amplifiers 75
3.4.8 Noise
For 1 μA, 7.8 × 1012 electrons passing every second will create a 7800 GHz ripple
(noise).
+
V out
-
VI
1MH
1F
~ ac
(a)
or -180°
Phase
180°
DC gain
80 dB 3 dB
0 dB
100 Hz fc fT Freq
(b)
FIGURE 3.23 (a) DC gain, fc (3 dB) and f T configuration and (b) DC gain, fc (3 dB) and f T
simulation result.
76 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VDD
M14 V1 V1 M12
M13 V1 V1 M1
Vin+ Vbias2
M3 M16 M15
R1
C1
Vout
Vbias3
M6 M4 M8 M10
M7 Vbias4 M5 M11 M9
____ I(vdd)(dB)
-------I(vdd)(°)
-70
0
I(vdd) (dB)
I(vdd) (°)
-72
-50
-74 -100
20
V(vout) (°)
-50
15
10 -100
5
-150
0
10 V(vin) 1.0
5 0.5
V(vin) (dB)
V(vin)(°)
0 0.0
-5 -0.5
-10 -1.0
103 104 105 106 107 108 109
Frequency (Hz)
FIGURE 3.25 Open loop response simulation result of the CMOS amplifier.
Amplifiers 77
+
-
~
(a)
12n
FIGURE 3.26 (a) Noise simulation configuration and (b) noise simulation results.
) )
noise(V/ Hz ) × frequency (Hz), 12 nV/ Hz ) × 900 = 360 nVrms
3.4.9 Distortion
Figure 3.29a and b describes the output signal in the time domain and frequency
domain, respectively. To convert the time domain to the frequency domain, an algo-
rithm called fast Fourier transform (FFT) or discrete Fourier transform (DFT) can
be used.
VDD
M14 V1 V1 M12
M13 V1 V1 M1
Vin+ Vbias2
M3 M16 M15
Vout
Vbias3
M6 M4 M8 M10
Vbias4 M11
M7 M5 M9
1.5x10-6 V(onoise)
1.0x10-6
5.0x10-7
0.0
1.5x10-6 V(inoise)
1.0x10-6
5.0x10-7
0.0
103 104 105 106
Frequency (Hz)
waveform is not
sinusoidal-it is distorted
(a)
550 mV
2 nd
5 th
(b) 25 kHz
FIGURE 3.29 (a) Distorted output signal and (b) distorted output signal in frequency
domain.
Harmonic
Therefore, Distortion = = 0.07 or 7%.
Fundamental
CAUTION -> Watch out with the FFT setting. Please do a test case.
M3 M4
M7
V3 V4
V1 V2
M1 M2
IBIAS
M6 M5
MC3
M3 M4
MC4
V3 V4
IBIAS RCM1
Vcm V1
MC1 MC2 RCM2 M1 M2
MB MC5 M5
VDD
M3 M4
VDD
Rz
M7
Vin- Vin+
M1 M2 Cc
Vout
R1 C3
C1
Vbias 3 M6T Vbias 3 M8T
FIGURE 3.32 Two-stage CMOS amplifier with open loop frequency response.
82 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
V(vout)(°)
V(vout)(dB)
0
60 -20
-40
40 -60
-80
V(vout) (dB)
V(vout) (°)
20 -100
-120
0 -140
-160
-20 -180
-200
-40 -220
103 104 105 106 107 108 109
Frequency (Hz)
The feedback capacitor, C1, and resistor, R1, form a time constant, so that none of
the Alternating Current (AC) output is fed back to the inverting input. Nevertheless,
the DC bias level is fed back, so that the input stage of the amplifier is properly
biased. Cc is the compensation capacitor used to “split” the lower frequency pole and
higher frequency pole further apart. While Miller-zero Cancellation Resistor (Rz) is
used to eliminate zero.
From Figure 3.33, the phase shifts when the gain in unity is −88°, so taking the
difference between this value and 180° gives a phase margin of 92°. The gain margin
is approximately 25 dB. The phase margin should be >60° to ensure stability, this is
to cater to process variation and so on. It is advisable to run some statistical analyses
to ensure the phase margin is “good” in all conditions.
Figure 3.34 shows an example of a simple bipolar opamp, which employs three-
stage design. Cc is the compensation capacitor.
Figure 3.35 shows another simulation of the loop gain and phase with closed-
loop gain determined by R1 and R2 (non-inventing amplifier). C1 and L1 are used to
“break” the closed-loop for the loop gain and phase analysis.
Based on Figure 3.35, without L and C what would happen, and what about the
DC biasing voltage?
Figure 3.36 shows loop analysis greater than phase margin (PM) with “suitable” Cc.
3.6.2 Pulse Response
Pulse response is another method that also can be used to study stability in the
opamp.
Amplifiers 83
VCC
Iref
Cc
IN – IN +
Out
VEE
+ Out
–
R2 R1
L1, (1MH)
CI (1F)
~ Vac
Phase
Phase Gain
( dB )
-180° or 180°
PM = 60°
60°
Larger
40 dB
CC
Loop gain
PM
0° 0 dB
+ Out
-
R1
R2
(a)
-1
(b) Time ( s )
FIGURE 3.37 (a) Simulation of the pulse response and (b) output pulse response of the
circuit in Figure 3.37a.
Z L / ( Zout + Z L ) → 1,
Yout = 1 / Zout
Amplifiers 85
AU, T
Jout = Uout/Zout
Zout
ZL
Uout UL
(a)
A I, S
Iout
Yout
ZL
Jout
(b)
FIGURE 3.38 (a) Output stage of voltage amplifier and current-to-voltage converter and (b)
output stage of current amplifier and voltage-to-current converter.
Z L / Zout << 1.
For amplifiers and current and voltage converters, respectively, one should keep the
following ratios of input signal generator impedances and input impedances of asso-
ciated circuits:
See Figure 3.39a and b.
Z in → 1 Z g >> 1 ( a),
Z g + Z in Z in
Zg
<< 1 (b).
Z in
AU , S AI , T
Iin
Zg Zg
Zin Zin
Ug Jg
(a) (b)
FIGURE 3.39 (a) Input as voltage source and (b) input as current source.
86 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
UPS RL
Uout
UB = const
Uin
T2
RL
CL
T1
( ) ( )
+
_
+
(1 + )
f3-db = 10 Mhz
Time constant is the inverse of the -3db frequency:
Av = 100
Rise time and fall time are each a few time constants.
Vin
Vout t ≈ 16 ns
Vin Vout
t ≈ 16 ns
Vout
R2
R1
V- -
V+ +
Vin
R2
R1
V- -
Vin
V+
+
While building wide-band amplifiers, local feedbacks (FBs) are used, and the
bandwidth of each cell is optimized.
Figure 3.49 shows example wide-band circuits of voltage amplifiers.
In the high frequency region, paraphrase circuits with source couplings are advan-
tageous, and transistors are used in Common Drain (CD) and Common Gate (CG)
Amplifiers 89
(a) (b)
FIGURE 3.47 Local feedbacks (a) of a series type and (b) of a parallel type.
2)
3)
4)
ZL1= Zin2(4) < Zin2(1) frequency characteristics are better than in (3)
+U
I1 Ro I2
Uout
Rg
Uin T1 T2
I0
-U
circuits (Т1) and (Т2). This is a special case of differential stages, the main difference
here is an asymmetrical circuit. In this circuit, the drain capacitance in the input arm
is minimized, and connecting the CG transistor converts current amplification into
voltage amplification. This is shown in Figure 3.50.
FIGURE 3.51 (a) Common source stage and (b) common source with including noise
sources.
- +
- + , ,
+
-
(a) (b)
FIGURE 3.52 Determination of input referred noise voltage: (a) noisy circuit and (b) noise-
less circuit.
The equation indicates noise in 1 Hz at a frequency f. The total output noise can be
obtained by integration over the bandwidth of interest.
Input referred noise is a fictitious quantity (that cannot be measured at input) that
allows comparisons between different circuits, see Figure 3.52. The input referred noise
voltage in this simple case is given by the output noise voltage divided by the gain.
V 2 n,out V 2 n,out
=
V 2 n,in =
A2 v g 2 m R2 D
2 K 1 2 4kT 2 1
V 2 n,in = 4kT gm + g m+ R D 2 2
3 C oxWL f RD g m RD
2 K 1 4kT
= ⋅4kT + + 2 (3.10)
3gm CoxWL f g m RD
Due to finite input impedance, modeling the input referred noise by merely a voltage
source is not accurate. Modeling input referred noise by both a series voltage source
and a parallel current source would be more accurate, see Figure 3.53.
92 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
I 2 n,drain −source
V 2 n,gate = (3.11)
g2 m
2 1 K 1
V 2 n,in = 4kT + 2 + (3.12)
3gm g m RD Cox WL f
1 2 1 K 1
I 2 n,in = 4kT + 2 + (3.13)
Z 2in 3
mg g R
m D Cox WL f
Figure 3.55a–d shows the CG stage input referred noise. The common gate with
large output resistance, ro, is shown in Figure 3.56.
2g 1 2
R D =V n,in ( gm + gmb ) R D , ∴
2 2
4kT m + 2
3 RD
2g 1
4kT m +
3 RD
V 2 n,in = (3.14)
( gm + gmb )
2
4kT
I 2 n,in = (3.15)
RD
While noise together with bias is shown in Figure 3.57. To reduce the noise compo-
nent, we must minimize gm2, but this degrades active-region voltage swing.
Flicker noise effect on the CG stage is shown in Figure 3.58.
1 g 2 m1K N g 2 m3 K p
V 2 n,out = + ( ro1 ro3 )
2
(3.16)
fCox (WL)1 (WL)3
1 g 2 m1K N g 2 m3 K p 1
V 2 n,in = + (3.17)
fCox (WL)1 (WL)3 ( gm1 + gmb1 )2
1 g 2 m 2 K N g 2 m3 K p 2
I 2 n,in = + R out (3.18)
fCox (WL )2 (WL )3
1 g2 m 2 K N g2 m3 K p
I 2 n,in = + (3.19)
fCox ( WL ) ( WL )3
2
2 2
=I 2 n 2 4=
kT gm 2 , I 2 n1 4kT gm1
3 3
2 1 g
V 2 n,in = 4kT + 2m 2 (3.20)
3 gm1 g m1
2 1
V 2 n,in |M 1, RD = 4kT + 2 , low freq. (3.21)
3gm g m RD
Vn,out − RD
= , significant at high freq. (3.22)
Vn2 1 1
+
gm2 sC x
2 K 1
V 2 n1 = 4kT + (3.23)
3gm Cox WL f
FIGURE 3.61 (a) Differential pair and (b) differential pair with noise source.
2 1 K 1
V 2 n,in = 8kT + 2 + (3.24)
3
mg g R
m D Cox WL f
2
− Rf 2
v 2 nout( tot ) ≈ e n Rs + e n R f
2
Rs
2
− Rf 2
v 2 nout(in ) ≈ e n Rs
Rs
• Noise factor
2 2
R e2 R R 4kTR f R
F ≈ 1+ s n f = 1+ s = 1+ s
R f e n Rs R f 4kTRs Rf
2
98 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
3.8.5 Noise Bandwidth
Figure 3.64a and b shows the output noise spectrum of a circuit and concept of noise
bandwidth.
It is meaningful to represent the noise as:
V 2 0 ⋅ Bn ,
where the bandwidth Bn is chosen so that:
∞
V 2 0 ⋅ Bn =
∫
0
V 2 n, out df (3.25)
FIGURE 3.62 Method to calculate input referred noise: (a) Output noise with inputs short
together, (b) effect each source individually, (c) contribution of In1. (Continued)
Amplifiers 99
FIGURE 3.62 (Continued) Method to calculate input referred noise: (d) method to calcu-
late input-referred noise.
FIGURE 3.63 (a) Opamp with feedback resistor and (b) noise source with feedback resistor.
3.11 SUMMARY
This chapter discusses the CMOS amplifier design with most of the amplifier speci-
fications or requirements. The technique can be used for many applications, such
as a high gain amplifier, high frequency, and low noise amplifier. This chapter is
very useful for a beginner in analog integrated circuit design. The niche low power
CMOS amplifier is discussed in the next chapter.
102 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
REFERENCES
1. Baker, R. J. (2010). CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (3rd ed.). Wiley-
IEEE Press. doi:10.1002/9780470891179.
2. Razavi, B. (2001). Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. New York: McGraw-
Hill Publisher, p. 261.
3. Silveira, F., Flandre, D., and Jespers, P. G. A. (1996). A gm/ID based methodology for
the design of CMOS analog circuits and its application to the synthesis of a silicon-on-
insulator. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 31(9), 1314–1319.
4. Enz, C., Chalkiadaki, M.-A., and Mangla, A. (2015). Low-power analog/RF circuit
design based on the inversion coefficient. European Solid-State Circuits Conference
(ESSCIRC), 2, 202–208.
4 Low Power Amplifier
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Various circuit techniques have been employed and demonstrated by these amplifiers
to achieve low-power operation without compromising too much on the gain, noise,
linearity, and size. Most of the time, it is impossible to win everything, thus, some
trade-offs will have to be made. But in the end, what really matters is getting the
right balance among all the parameters of the amplifier.
103
104 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
4.3 SUBTHRESHOLD
This is a popular low-power design technique and is also known as weak inversion.
The use of this technique in design could obtain very low power consumption, thus
prolonging battery life. Subthreshold biasing occurs when the gate-source voltage,
Low Power Amplifier 105
VGS , of the MOS transistor is less than the extrapolated threshold voltage, VTH , of the
device, but sufficient enough to cause the formation of a depletion region at the sur-
face of the silicon substrate adjacent to the drain-source channel. The drain current
for subthreshold biasing is caused by the flow of a diffusion current due to the minor-
ity charge carrier concentration gradient, rather than the drift of majority charge
carriers in the channel, which is negligible. For an NMOS transistor operating in the
subthreshold region, this is analogous to a negative-positive-negative (npn) bipolar
transistor, where the silicon substrate acts as the base, while the source and drain
terminals represent the emitter and the collector, respectively.
The drain current for subthreshold biasing can be expressed as:
W V −V VDS
ID = I D 0exp GS TH 1 − exp − V , (4.2)
L nVT T
where W = gate width, L = gate length, I D0 = drain current when the gate-source
voltage equals the threshold voltage, VGS = gate-source voltage, VTH = threshold volt-
age, n = ratio of sum of gate-oxide capacitance and depletion-region capacitance
over gate-oxide capacitance, VT = thermal voltage, and VDS = drain-source voltage.
Figure 4.2 [2] depicts the plot of log I D against VGS , where the straight line around
the region VGS < VTH represents Equation 4.2 and is known as the subthreshold expo-
nential region.
Also from Equation 4.2, as VDS increases to more than approximately 3 VT , the drain
current becomes almost constant because the last term in the equation approaches
unity. This is illustrated in Figure 4.3 [3].
It implies that for subthreshold biasing, the MOS transistor merely needs around
0.1 V of drain-source voltage to operate in its saturation region, as VT is only about
25 mV at room temperature. This very low minimum saturation VDS for MOS transis-
tors is therefore very appealing for low-power analog circuits, as less supply voltage
is needed to power up the devices.
FIGURE 4.2 Plot of log against showing the exponential region of subthreshold biasing and
the square-law–relationship in strong inversion.
106 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
ID I Cox
gm = = D (4.3)
nVT VT C js + Cox
where Cox = gate-oxide capacitance per unit area, and C js = depletion-region capaci-
tance per unit area. From Equation 4.3, the ratio of transconductance to drain current
in subthreshold biasing is given by:
gm 1 1 Cox
= = (4.4)
I D nVT VT C js + Cox
In subthreshold biasing, the ratio of gm over I D is significantly higher than that for
strong inversion. Amplifiers imply that for the same amount of drain current, sub-
threshold biasing produces a greater transconductance, thus giving better current
efficiency. However, to increase the current in subthreshold biasing while main-
taining the same VGS in the subthreshold region, the width of the MOS transistor
will need to be increased as given by Equation 4.2. This eventually will result in
a much larger MOS device size, hence, a larger total size of the integrated circuit
(IC) layout.
The use of the subthreshold biasing technique for low-power applications is
restricted only to those with relatively low operating frequencies. This is due to a
very small transition frequency, fT , for subthreshold biasing that renders it unsuitable
for higher frequencies, especially those beyond 1 GHz. The transition frequency, fT ,
is defined as the frequency at which the MOS transistor’s current gain falls to unity.
However, as CMOS technology becomes smaller, the transition frequency has been
found to be increasing [4].
Low Power Amplifier 107
In Figure 4.4b, the resistive load is being replaced with an active load, PMOS1.
The current, I D , passing through this PMOS1 is therefore being reused by NMOS1.
With the current passing through both NMOS1 and PMOS1 still being I D , the low-
frequency, small-signal voltage gain now is given by:
When the input signal is also being driven by PMOS1 in addition to NMOS1, as
depicted by Figure 4.4c, with the same current, I D , passing through both transistors,
the low-frequency, small-signal voltage gain can now be expressed as:
FIGURE 4.4 (a) Typical CS amplifier, (b) CS amplifier with active load, and (c) current
reuse concept.
108 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Now, the effective transconductance of this amplifier has increased from a mere
gm _ NMOS1 to ( gm _ PMOS1 + gm _ NMOS1 ), with the drawn current remaining unchanged.
All in all, this shows how the current-reuse technique can help the circuit to be more
economical in terms of total current drawn and the effective transconductance it
produces. Conversely, the total current drawn can be reduced without reducing the
initial effective transconductance.
This current-reuse technique has been implemented through a number of different
ways by various authors [5–12], most commonly by stacking a PMOS transistor on top
of an NMOS transistor in the same direct current (DC) current path, as shown previously
by Figure 4.4c. With both PMOS and NMOS transistors in the same DC current path,
one can opt for either a complementary common-source current-reuse or complemen-
tary common-gate current-reuse configuration, as illustrated in Figures 4.5 and 4.6.
FIGURE 4.8 Common-gate with gain-boosting wideband differential LNA circuit sche-
matic proposed by Belmas et al. (Redrawn from Belmas, F. et al., IEEE J. Solid State Circ.,
47, 1094–1103, 2012.)
Low Power Amplifier 111
gm-boosting of the LNA. NMOS transistor M1 together with resistor R1 form the
main common-gate amplifier. This main common-gate amplifier is being gm-boosted
by the output from another common-gate amplifier (formed from NMOS transistor
M3 and resistor R3) and also from the capacitive cross-coupling (through capacitor
C4) of the output from the main common-gate amplifier of the opposite half-circuit.
The common-gate amplifier formed from M3 and R3 is also gm-boosted, and this is
by the cross-coupling of the input signal from the opposite half-circuit to the gate of
M3. PMOS transistor M4 acts as an active load to prevent a large DC voltage drop
across R3. The gate of M4 is connected to the gate of M4 of the opposite half-circuit
to create a dynamic ground. The main advantage of this LNA seems to be its small
size of 0.007 mm2 due to its inductorless topology. However, its differential topology
and some cross-couplings (to attain gm-boosting) necessitate the use of four DC volt-
age rails to supply all the common-gate amplifiers, thus resulting in high total power
consumption of 1.32 mW.
amplifier is 10. It is a big increase of gain, if two out-of-phase signals are applied to
the gate and source of M1 simultaneously.
4.7 SUMMARY
Current-reuse is a low-power design technique that can boost the effective transcon-
ductance of a LNA without further increasing the drawn current, hence, the total
power consumption. The most common ways of implementing this technique are
through complementary common-source and common-gate current-reuse topolo-
gies and differential common-gate current-reuse with capacitive cross-coupling
topology.
Subthreshold biasing or weak inversion is another low-power design technique,
where the gate-source voltage applied to a MOS transistor is slightly lower than the
transistor’s threshold voltage. As a result of subthreshold biasing, the MOS transis-
tor only needs a relatively very low drain-source voltage to operate in its saturation
region. Also, the ratio of gm over I D in subthreshold biasing is significantly higher,
which implies that this technique gives better current efficiency.
Low Power Amplifier 115
REFERENCES
1. Lee, S.‐G., and Lee, J.‐W. (2011). A Q‐band CMOS low‐noise amplifier using a low‐
voltage cascode in 0.13‐μm CMOS technology. Microwave and Optical Technology
Letters, 53, 2985–2988.
2. Razavi, B. (2001). Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. New York: McGraw-
Hill Education.
3. Gray, P. R., Hurst, P. J., Lewis, S. H., and Meyer, R. (2010). Analysis and Design of
Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed. New York: Wiley, pp. 811–821.
4. Yang, J., Tran, N., Bai, S., Fu, M., Skafidas, E., Halpern, M., Ng, D. C., and Mareels, I.
(2011). A subthreshold down converter optimized for super-low-power applications in
MICS band. 2011 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, BioCAS 2011,
2, 189–192.
5. Khoshroo, P., Elmi, M., and Naimi, H. M. (2016). A low-power current-reuse
resistive-feedback LNA in 90 nm CMOS. 2016 24th Iranian Conference on Electrical
Engineering, ICEE 2016 (pp. 917–920).
6. Reddy, K. V. (2017). A 280 µW sub-threshold Balun LNA for medical radio using
current re-use technique. PhD Research in Microelectronics and Electronics Latin
America (PRIME-LA), pp. 1–4.
7. Pan, Z., Qin, C., Ye, Z., and Wang, Y. (2017). A low power inductorless wideband
LNA with Gm enhancement and noise cancellation. IEEE Microwave and Wireless
Components Letters, 27(1), 58–60.
8. Salimath, A., Karamcheti, P., and Halder, A. (2014). A 1 V, sub-mW CMOS LNA for low-
power 1 GHz wide-band wireless applications. Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on VLSI Design, (c) (pp. 460–465).
9. Cruz, H., Huang, H. Y., Lee, S. Y., and Luo, C. H. (2015). A 1.3 mW low-IF, c urrent-reuse,
and current-bleeding RF front-end for the MICS band with sensitivity of −97 dbm.
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 62(6), 1627–1636.
10. Cha, H. K., Raja, M. K., Yuan, X., and Je, M. (2011). A CMOS MedRadio receiver RF
front-end with a complementary current-reuse LNA. IEEE Transactions on Microwave
Theory and Techniques, 59(7), 1846–1854.
11. Choi, C., Kwon, K., and Nam, I. (2016). A 370 µm CMOS MedRadio receiver front-end
with inverter-based complementary switching mixer. IEEE Microwave and Wireless
Components Letters, 26(1), 73–75.
12. Parvizi, M., Allidina, K., and El-Gamal, M. N. (2016). An ultra-low-power wideband
inductorless CMOS LNA with tunable active shunt-feedback. IEEE Transactions on
Microwave Theory and Techniques, 64(6), 1843–1853.
13. Wang, S. B. T., Niknejad, A. M., and Brodersen, R. W. (2006). Design of a sub-mW 960-
MHz UWB CMOS LNA. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 41(11), 2449–2456.
14. Belmas, F., Hameau, F., and Fournier, J. M. (2012). A low power inductorless LNA with
double Gm enhancement in 130 nm CMOS. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,
47(5), 1094–1103.
5 Voltage Regulator,
References and Biasing
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The main sub-blocks of analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits, such as ampli-
fiers, oscillators, and data converters require biasing circuitries to bias their tran-
sistors. The circuit designated to provide biasing voltages to these transistors is
generally known as biasing circuitry. The basic element in the biasing circuitries is a
current source and current mirror. The concept of current mirror/source is if we can
set both VGS and VDS, we can attain the drain current, ID, or if we can set the ID and
VGS, then we can attain the VDS.
Voltage reference or current reference circuits are specifically designed circuits
to provide constant voltage or current across the process, voltage, and temperature
(PVT). The voltage reference is typically a combination of current sources.
1
Ro = (5.1)
λn I DSAT
where λ is the channel length modulation parameter. Five variables are available as
design parameters: W1, L1, W2, L2, and VGS. Normally, the values of L and VGS are
picked first to simplify the design process. For example, making all values of L equal
reduces the current ratio equation to a ratio of transistor widths:
I D2 W2
= (5.2)
I D1 W1
117
118 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VDD VDD
R R
D D
G G
M1 M2
S S
Channel-length modulation
is neglected here.
Also, making all values of L the same serves to make the effects of process variations
constant from transistor to transistor. Lateral diffusion, etch effects, and photolithog-
raphy errors will then affect the circuit in a “common mode” manner. Errors tend to
cancel under these conditions.
In general, it is a good practice to make L as large as possible for analog designs.
Increasing L reduces the value of λ. Setting L equal to three times the process mini-
mum length is a good rule to start with. This rule can be modified after you have
experience with a particular process. It is also a good practice to design for a specific
VGS that is somewhat larger than Vth. Higher values of VGS allow smaller values of W
to be used, but the value of Vdsat will be increased. Values of VGS that approach Vth
result in physically large transistors.
Voltage Regulator, References and Biasing 119
VDD VDD
Vbias2
+ + w/2 -
w/2
Out
5.3 SELF-BIASED
Self-biased is a scheme that saves power and reduces circuit area, and this is
chosen to eliminate the needs of external biasing circuitry by generating bias
voltages from internal nodes of the circuit. The idea is shown in Figure 5.3.
Using this approach in biasing would lead to non-constant current values across
the PVT variation.
VREF VREF
T, temperature T, temperature
(a) (b)
Iref
Diode
voltage
Diode voltage
Temp, °C
VCC
M1 M2
M3
+ ZENER R IOUT
VZ
-
M4 M5
GND
works as a voltage reference or a source with a Tcc near zero. The current reference,
Iout = Vz/R, this circuit depends on the Tcc of R. The disadvantages of this circuit are
the supply voltage needs to be more than the Zener breakdown voltage and a noisy
Zener diode.
5.5.1 Bandgap Reference
The bandgap circuit as shown in Figure 5.7 is tentatively an essential analog circuit
to generate reference voltages or currents that exhibit little dependence on tempera-
ture. Vertical parasitic pnp bipolar junction transistors are normally used as diodes.
In general,
R5 R4
VOUT
+
-
R7
Q1 Q2
VSD
where V1 has positive Tcc, and V2 has negative Tcc (varying in opposite directions with
temperature).
Choosing α1 and α2 so that α1 δV1/δT + α2 δV2/δT = 0. Hence, the reference band-
gap voltage obtained will be zero Tcc.
For a bipolar device, Ic = Is exp (VBE/V T ), where V T = kT/q.
Therefore, VBE = V T ln (Ic/Is). Hence, in Equation 5.3, the bandgap voltage is
now defined as below:
Vinm = Vinp
Hence,
and
The assumption is the current into transistors is similar or equal to Iref. For large
voltage application, this bandgap circuit can be incorporated by multiple series base
emitter voltages instead of one base emitter, as in the above example.
vdd
M1 M2
I1
I2
M4 M3
IR R VGS
gnd
unity. If one assumes that M3 and M4 operate in the weak inversion region, and the
supply voltage (VDD) is high enough to ensure the saturation of M1 and M2, then
delta gate source voltage (VGS ) can be expressed as follows:
∆VGS = VT ln ( k ) (5.7)
where V T = kT/q is the thermal voltage, k = (S1/S2)*(S3/S4), and S1, S2, S3, and S4 are
W/L aspect ratios of the respective MOSFETs. Notice that delta VGS does not depend
on the current level, as long as M3 and M4 are in weak inversion. The current IR is
defined by R and can be reproduced by further current mirrors.
The presence of a resistor is a drawback. If a low current is required, a high value
resistance is needed, which costs a large silicon area. The accurate resistance in
not guaranteed by some foundries and can vary with technology. In the proposed
voltage reference source, the resistor R is replaced by negative-type metal-oxide
semiconductor field-effect transistors (n-MOSFETs) M5 and M6, which work in the
linear region of weak inversion. Both of those MOSFETs are biased by stable out-
put reference voltage (VREF) to assure that the drain-source resistance, rds of the
MOSFET resistors M5 and M6 varies only with process and temperature, not with
supply voltage. This behavior modifies the generated currents 19 and IR with the
process and temperature variations in the opposite way to process and temperature
fluctuations in the output load circuit built with M7 and M8. This concept is depicted
in Figure 5.9.
124 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
vdd
M1 M2 M9
M10
I1 M7
I2
M8
M4 M3
IR
M5
Istart
VGS
M11
M6 VREF
gnd
As ∆VGS is considered as the PTAT source, then the VDS of M7 and M8 behaves as
the CTAT source.
M1 M3
100/2 100/2
0.4
M2 M4
10/5 10/5
0.7 V
as vgs4 = 0 (from the small signal point of view), the equation is left without M4
parameters.
R
Vo = Vref . 1 + 1 (5.10)
R2
Pass transistor
Unregulated ro VO
DC M1
+ VC
+− R1 RL I
− Vin L
AV
+ VO'
Vi –
Vref +
VO R2
R = R3 + R1 (5.11)
where R0 and R1 are the total resistance, R of the high voltage resistor.
The current through resistor R is the sum of the Zener current, IZ, and the transis-
tor gate current IG (=ID/β ≡ IOUT/β), where β is the current gain of the transistor.
IR = IZ + IG (5.12)
The DC input voltage, VIN, is fed to the input terminals, and the regulated output voltage,
Vout, is obtained across the load resistor, R2. The diode provides the reference voltage,
VZ, and the DMOS acts as a variable resistor, whose resistance varies with the gate cur-
rent, IG. The principle of the operation of such a regulator is based on the fact that a large
proportion of the change in the input voltage appears across the transistor. Therefore, the
output voltage tends to remain constant. The polarities of different voltages are,
vin
R3
R1
out
Zener R2
diode Zener
diode
vssa
The gate-source voltage, VGS, of the transistor remains almost constant, being equal to
that across the Zener diode, Vz. For the operation of the series regulator, the increased
VGS causes the DMOS to conduct more if the VOUT decreases, thereby raising the out-
put voltage and maintaining the output constant. If the VOUT increases, the decrease
of VGS causes the DMOS to conduct less, thereby reducing the output voltage and
maintaining the output constant. The resistor R2 is calculated using an equation,
The second diode, D1 at the output stage, is to clamp the overshoot voltage.
The key principle in this type of circuit, such as “Low drop regulator” is achieved
by finding a low drop pass element/transistor. Nevertheless, switching regulators
could improve the efficiency of a regulator, but with an increase in noise.
Vdd
M7 M10
R1 12k R2 24k
Vbg
U1
+
- M8 M8 M9
OPAMP
R3 4k Bandgap amp R4 5k Out1
d 1X d 18X
R5 5k
Vbg/2 U2
M3 M4
+
-
OPAMP
R6 5k
Current amp
˜ Vbg/2
R7 5k R8 5k
R9 5k
Current Generator
R11 5k
2
R10 5k
U3
1
tClose = 0
2
R12 5k
U4
1
tClose = 0
circuitries. “Vbg” is the bandgap voltage, which the value is constant across the
PVT. It uses the VBE of the diode as a CTAT source, while the ∆ VBE is used as
the PTAT source. The bandgap amp is used to force both voltages at its inputs to be
approximately the same. Figure 5.13 also shows the biasing circuitries for a circuit
that requires good current sources. The second operational amplifier (opamp), called
current amplifier (amp), is used to provide a constant current source or transconduc-
tance. The concept is similar to the circuit in Figure 5.11, with only slight modifica-
tion. The current amp forces the transistors M3 and M4 to produce a constant current
across at least the VDD variation. From the figure, the current is
0.5Vbg1
I D3 = (5.15)
Req
where the equivalent resistor, Req, is the total resistance for the “current generator.”
Obviously, the current is constant across the voltage and temperature variation. This cur-
rent can be reproduced to another circuit by using a simple current mirror concept.
Voltage Regulator, References and Biasing 129
Figure 5.14 shows the digital-to-analog converter (DAC) Reference generates the
bias voltages necessary for the switchable current sources (Figure 7.3) in the hybrid
DAC (Section 7.2.3). A single stage amplifier is used to impose the reference volt-
age across the 3l unit resistors in the series. At the top of that series resistor, there is
16 unit of current source, one unit of resistor value that is arranged in series is 120 Ω
(to match with the resistor in the binary-weighted resistor string).
The first bias voltage, DACBIAS1, is the voltage required at the gate of the transis-
tor Ml in a switchable current source to maintain a constant current. The second bias
voltage, DACBIAS2, is a cascode bias feeding to increase the output impedance of
the current source. The VREF is needed to maintain the bias voltages because this is
one of the most important factors to provide a constant current throughout the resistor
network. Resistor R and capacitor C in the figure are used for circuit stability. VOUT
and feedback voltage are connected at the top level in order to configure the circuit as a
buffer amplifier. The fourth terminals of the PMOS transistors are connected to VDD,
while the fourth terminal of the NMOS transistors is connected to Ground (GND).
With the target value current, I equals 20 µA, the VOUT is therefore equal to 1.1999 V.
Id (M1)
Id (M2)
2.4x10-5
2.2x10-5
2.0x10-5
1.8x10-5
Id (A)
1.6x10-5
1.4x10-5
1.2x10-5
1.0x10-5
0 2 4
Vo (V)
VDD
20/2 Vbias1
Vbiasp
Iref = 20µA
10/2 10/2 10/2 Vbias4
Vbias1
Vbias2
4 Vbias3
Vbias4
3
V (V)
Vsu 6/2
6/20
30/10 30/10
Vbiasn
Rbias
6/20 10 KΩ
Vbiasn
1.0
Vbiasn (V)
0.5
0.0
0 2 4 6
Vdd (V)
FIGURE 5.19 BMR simulation result.
1.5
1.0
Vref (V)
0.5
0.0
0 2 4 6
Vdd (V)
result. Figure 5.20 depicts a bandgap circuit, which is a modified beta multiplier ref-
erence (BMR) circuit. Figure 5.21 shows the simulation result of the bandgap circuit.
The output voltage is approximately equal to 1.2 V across the temperature variation.
5.12 SUMMARY
In this chapter, a bandgap or reference voltage circuit is discussed. These circuits
are normally applicable to practical analog or mixed-signal integrated circuits.
The diodeless circuitry is a new innovation that could be applied to mixed-signal
integrated circuit products if proper investigation about the PVT variation and the
technique to improve is available.
PROBLEMS
Based on Figure 5.1, if the targeted current is 20 µA. W = 6 µm, L = 1.2 µm. Using
Table 2.8 calculate the required Vgs.
REFERENCES
1. Gray, P. R., Hurst, P. J., Lewis, S. H., and Meyer, R. G. (2009). Analysis and Design of
Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Borejko, T., and Pleskacz, W. A. (2008). A resistorless voltage reference source for
90 nm CMOS technology with low sensitivity to process and temperature variations.
11th IEEE Workshop on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems
(pp. 1–6).
3. Vittoz, E., and Fellrath, J. (1977). CMOS analog integrated circuits based on weak
inversion operations. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 12(3), 224–231.
4. Flandre, D., Demeus, L., Dessard, V., Viviani, A., Gentinne, B., and Eggermont,
J.-P. (2002). Design and application of SOI CMOS OTAs for high-temperature envi-
ronments. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems: Analog and Digital Signal
Processing, 49, 449.
6 Introduction of
Advanced Analog Circuit
6.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter will be useful in designing a mixed-signal integrated circuit. Many
conventional analog circuits can be replaced with the dynamic analog circuit and
non-linear analog circuit. The dynamic analog circuit employs the fact that charge
or information can be stored on a capacitor or gate capacitance of a metal-oxide
semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET). However, the non-linear circuit
exploits the non-linear characteristics of the device or sub-circuit. The example
of the circuits is an analog multiplier, logarithmic amplifier, etc. Most of the basic
switched-capacitor circuitries are explained in this chapter. A chopper amplifier con-
cept is also introduced in this chapter.
Weff
where β = C0 × µ × .
Leff
Obviously, the MOS transistor switch conductance varies with an input signal.
The conductance of the switch can be made slightly constant by using PMOS and
NMOS transistors connected in parallel.
The charge injection effect can also be decreased by using PMOS and NMOS
transistors connected in parallel in the analog switch. These transistors inject charges
of opposite signs, thus there are prerequisites for their compensation.
The absolute value of a charge in the NMOS transistor inversion layer is:
135
136 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
It is clear that the equality of QN and QP can be achieved only at the only value of
Vin , close to Vdd .
2
T1 T2
Sw1 C Sw2
+ +
V1 V2
- Cp1 Cp2 -
Vssa Vssa
Gnda
T1
T2
The charge numerically equal to the average current passes between sources V1
and V2 for one second:
(V1 − V2 )
I = (C + C P1 + C P 2 )(V1 − V2 ) × Fs = , (6.5a)
Reff
1
where Reff = is an effective resistance of the SC. (6.5b)
Fs × (C + CP1 + CP 2 )
is continuous in time. In the rest of the SCs, which are quite numerous, the input
signal changes right on the clock boundary, as it is defined by previous SCs. As it is
these SCs that determine mainly the transfer function of the SC-system, it is common
to consider in the SC analysis that the delay in the switching capacitor with a delay
is equal to the whole clock period, i.e., to one. That the delay is different from one in
the only (as a rule) SC is taken into account separately, however, in most SC-systems
of the high enough order, this is not significant. Summing up what was said above,
we shall note that this SC is called a non-inverting SC with a delay.
It can be written that the charge passing from V1 to V2 conforms with the follow-
ing expression:
1 1
H ( s) = − ×
s RC2
Let us replace formally the resistor with its equivalent on the SC in Equation 6.5b:
1
R= .
(C1 + CP1 + CP 2 ) × Fs
F (C + C P1 + C P 2 )
Then: H ( s) = − ss × 1
C2
When the switch Т2 is closed, at the first moment of the total charge on С1, СР1, and
СР2 are distributed between these capacitors and the input capacitor of the OA invert-
ing input, resulting in its changed potential. The sign of the output voltage VOUT change
is opposite, and the charge arriving at the С2 right plate is opposite to the potential
sign at the inverting input. To preserve the total electric neutrality of both plates of the
capacitor С2, a charge is “pushed out” of the С2 left plate into the inverting input circuit.
This charge has a sign similar to that of the charge added to the С2 right plate, but oppo-
site to the sign of the charge, which arrived from the SC to the OA inverting input. As a
result, the charge, which arrived from the SC at the OA inverting input, is compensated.
The compensation process lasts until the inverting input potential becomes zero.
When this result is achieved, the whole charge, which arrived from the SC at the
OA inverting input circuit, is compensated. It turns out here that the charge “pushed
out” of the С2 left plate is of the opposite sign, but is equal in its absolute value to the
Introduction of Advanced Analog Circuit 139
charge which arrived from the SC at the OA inverting input. The result is similar to
the transition of the whole charge, which arrived at the OA inverting input to the C2
integrating capacitor. It is this conclusion that is always meant while analyzing the
active integrator on SC.
Thus, the charge delayed by a clock period and equal in its absolute value to
VIN ( N −1) × (C1 + CP1 + CP 2 ), after passing to the capacitor С2, changes the voltage on it
and, hence, at the integrator SC output, to:
C1 + C P1 + C P 2
∆VOUT ( N ) = −VIN ( N −1) . (6.7)
C2
As a result, if, for example, VIN = const , the voltage at the integrator SC output
changes (to the side opposite to the VIN sign) stepwise (see Figure 6.2), the envelope
of these steps being a straight line as in the continuous integrator.
C2
T1 T2
I
N C1 A OUT
Cp1 Cp2
Gnda Gnda
N-1 N N+1
T1
T2
Integrator
Output
T2 T2
C
Sw4 Sw3
T1 Sw2 Sw1 T1
+ Cp1 Cp2 +
V1 - - V2
Vssa + Vssa
Gnda V2 = V3 -
Vssa
Let the notes given above while analyzing the SC in Figure 6.1 be true.
Switches Sw1 and Sw2, controlled by the clock signal Т1, are closed, and switches Sw3
and Sw4 are open: T1 ⇒ 1.
When the capacitor С is discharged, both plates have potentials V3 = V2; parasitic
capacitors Сp1 and Сp2 are also charged to the voltage V3 = V2. Charges, which are on
both plates of the capacitor, go to the source V3, as a result, the charge stored on the
capacitor is equal to zero.
Switches Sw3 and Sw4, controlled by the clock signal Т2, are closed, and switches Sw1
and Sw2 are open: T2 ⇒ 1.
When the parasitic capacitor Сp2 is not recharged; the left plate of the capacitor
С is charged to V1, and the right one is charged to V2. Charges on the plates, equal
in absolute values С(V1 − V2) and opposite in sign, come from sources V1 and V2.
A positive charge comes from the source V1, and a negative charge of the same value
comes from V2. We can reason the same in another way: to conserve the electric
neutrality of the capacitor, a positive charge equal to С(V1 − V2) is “pushed out” of
the SC right plate and goes directly to V2. In either method of reasoning, the result-
ing effect is transferring a positive charge of the С(V1 − V2) value to V2 at each clock
period. As can be seen, parasitic capacitors transfer no charge to V2. The parasitic
capacitor Сp1 is certainly recharged at this time, but one should not worry about it,
as it is connected with the input voltage source V1, i.e., with the charge source.
Like the SC in Figure 6.1, the SC in Figure 6.3 being analyzed is a non-inverting
SC, for to V2, i.e., the transferred charge collector, a charge is transferred which has
a sign similar to the sign of the charge passing from V1 to V2 when sources V1 and V2
are simply connected with a resistor.
Let the source of time-variant voltage V1 be on the left in Figure 6.3, just as in the
same name analysis for the SC in Figure 6.1, and the constant voltage source V2 be
on the right. As it is clear from the SC (Figure 6.3) operation description, the nega-
tive charge is transferred from the source V2 to the SC right plate at moments which
coincide with moments of connecting the SC to V1, that is, at moments of transferring
Introduction of Advanced Analog Circuit 141
the positive charge from the source V1 to the SC left plate. There is no delay in charge
transfer from V1 to V2 in this case. These SCs are called non-inverting SCs without
delay. The charge coming from V1 to V2 is:
If this process is repeated in each clock period with the frequency FS, the average
current I, flowing from V1 to V2 is: I = C × V1 × Fs , and the equivalent resistance is:
1
R= (6.9)
C × Fs
C1
∆VOUT ( N ) = −VIN ( N ) × (6.10)
C2
C2
T2 C1 T2
IN
Sw4 Sw3 A OUT
T1 Sw2 Sw1 T1
Cp1 Cp2
Gnda
Gnda Gnda
It is clear that both switches and OAs are lag elements so “without delay” means that
the beginning of VOUT change occurs without delay regarding the point of time when
T2 ⇒ 1. The transition period end point is the beginning of the next clock period.
If the resistor in the active resistor capacitor (ARC) integrator is replaced with
its equivalent formally, Equation 6.9, the transfer function of this integrator is:
H (s) = s ( RC
1
2)
= Fss × CC21 . The second main advantage of the SC method follows from
here: The time constant accuracy of the SC integrator based on SC non-sensitive
to parasitic capacitances does not depend on resistance and capacitance absolute
values (rated values of each of these components range within ±20% from batch to
batch), but on the capacitance ratio C1 , equal to 0.1%–0.2% for most technological
C2
processes.
The SC left plate is charged up to the positive potential V1, the right plate is
charged up to the potential V3, negative respective to the potential V1.
Introduction of Advanced Analog Circuit 143
T1d T2
C
Sw2 Sw3
Gnda V2 = V3 -
Vssa
T1
T1d
T2
T2d
N -1 N -1/2 N
Switch Sw1, controlled by the clock signal Т1, opens. Then switch Sw2, controlled by
the clock Т1d , opens: T1 ⇒ 0 then T1d ⇒ 0 .
Let the clock period T2 be still equal to zero and T1d be still equal to one. The SC
right plate has been floating since the point T1 ⇒ 0 , so there is a charge on the SC which
corresponds to the instantaneous voltage V1 at the point T1 ⇒ 0 . Let this moment be
equal N − 12 and the corresponding charge be:
Q 1 = V 1 ×C (6.11)
1 N − 1 N −
2 2
At any number of the point T1 ⇒ 0 , the SC right plate has the same potential equal to
V3, i.e., independent of the value of V1. Thus, the value of the charge injected into the
right plate at the Sw1 switch opening at the point T1 ⇒ 0 does not depend on V1, and,
therefore does not produce non-linear distortion. At the point when T1 ⇒ 0 , the SC
left plate must be connected to the voltage source (with V1 in this case) not to prevent
the charge equal in its absolute value to the charge injected into the left plate from
coming to this plate from the voltage source. If we assume, theoretically, that the
144 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
clock Т1 opens Sw2 which connects the left plates with V1, but not Sw1, the charge
injected into the left plate will depend on the value of V1 at this moment and, as a
result, non-linear distortion will occur. Disconnecting the left plate from V1 after
disconnecting the right one from the ground, i.e., at the point T1d ⇒ 0 , does not bring
any additional charge into the left plate, as the right plate is floating at the moment
and cannot exchange the charge with the voltage source.
Thus, the SC switch opening sequence, when the switch connecting the SC plate
with the constant voltage source opens first, adds no non-linear distortion.
Switches Sw3 and Sw4 close in turn, switches Sw1 and Sw2 are open: T2 ⇒ 1, then T2 d ⇒ 1.
The switch Sw3 connecting the SC right plate with the constant voltage source V2
is the first to close in the N-th clock period at the point T2 ⇒ 1. As for V3 = V2, the
charge state of the SC does not change.
Then, at T2 d ⇒ 1, the left plate potential became more negative by the value of:
V1( N ) = V 1 − V3 . (6.12)
1 N −
2
To preserve the total zero charge of the SC, a negative charge of the same value is
pushed out of the right plate into the source V2. It is clear that this charge differs from
Equation 6.12 by a fixed value taking into account the charge injection effect at Sw1
opening, but it produces no non-linear distortion.
Bearing in mind the reasons given above when the elementary SC with a delay
was described, we can write:
It is clear from what is described in the last section that despite the positive sign of V1
relative to V2, a negative charge passes from V1 to V2!!! Due to this property, the SC
shown in Figure 6.5 is called an inverting SC with a delay.
C1
∆VOUT ( N ) = VIN ( N −1) × (6.14)
C2
Introduction of Advanced Analog Circuit 145
C2
T1d C1 T2
IN
Sw2 Sw1 A OUT
T2d Sw4 Sw3 T1
Cp1 Cp2
Gnda
Gnda Gnda
phi0
phi1
phi1
outp inp
capacitor
phi1 capacitor inm
outn
phi1
phi0
VDDA
VSSA D1 D2
D1
D2
In+ In-
ibias out- out+
out+ out-
VSSA
Vcmp Vcmn
Vhold
Vsample
Vsample
FIGURE 6.8 Differential input operational amplifier with the CMFB.
input, the CMFB amplifier compares it with Vcm (connected to Vref), and adjusts the bias-
ing current until the averaged output is equal to Vcm. The ibias is supplied by the bandgap
circuit. Vsample is connected to phi1, while Vhold is connected to “phi0.”
Finite gain opamp could give us problem when phi1 high, the Vout = Aol·Vcm/
(Aol + 1) = Vcm , if only Aol is big.
Vos
+ - VCM
Cf
Qp=-Cs(vx-Vos) + Cf(Vos)
Vx-Vos Vos
Vx+Vcm + - + - + -
Cs Vcm Vos + Vcm
AMP
Cs Vcm Vcm
Vy+Vcm
+ - - +
Vy
Qn=-Cs(Vy)
Cf
- VCM
+
0V
Vos
+ - VCM
Cf
Qp=-Cs(vx-Vos) + Cf(Vos)
Vx-Vos Vos
Vx+Vcm + - + - + -
Cs Vcm Vcm
AMP
Cs Vcm Vcm
Vy+Vcm
+ - - +
Vy
Qn=-Cs(Vy)
Cf
- VCM
+
0V
To cancel the offset voltage, during sampling while the amplifier is in unity
gain, the feedback capacitors are also connected between the input nodes of the
amp and the common mode voltage. As shown in Figure 6.10, this allows charge
from any offset voltage Vos to be stored on a feedback capacitor. During the hold
cycle, it can be shown that this offset charge stored on the feedback capacitor will
cancel its equivalent (error charge) that became stored on the amp’s input node.
148 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Voutn-Vcm
- + VCM
Cf
Vos
+ - + -
Cs + Vcm Voutn
AMP
Vos
Cs - Vcm
- + Voutp
Vy
Figure 6.11 shows the hold cycle with the changes in the node voltages. The charge
on the input nodes of the amp is the same as it was during sampling, but it is
described in terms of the new node voltages.
To find the transfer function, the expression for the charge stored on each amp’s
input node during the sample cycle, needs to be equated with the expression for the
charge during the hold cycle, see Figure 6.11.
For the + input node charge (Qp):
Subtracting Equation 6.15 from Equation 6.16 yields the differential transfer func-
tion for sample and hold:
Note that the offset voltage Vos has been cancelled out.
6.6.1 Timing
Note that the gain selection involves choosing different values of Cs and Cf from
arrays of capacitors. These need to be chosen after the hold cycle and before the next
sample cycle so the new values of Cs and Cf for either PGA are latched by the falling
edge of their hold clock. See Figure 6.12.
HOLD2
Cf
VCM Cf
VCM
HOLD1
FBCL2 FBCL1
SAMP1 SAMP2
HOLD1 HOLD2
Pixel signal
Cs + - Cs + - +
PGA1
PGA2
Ref signal
Cs
- + Cs
- + -
HOLD1 HOLD2
SAMP1 SAMP2
FBCL2 FBCL1
Cf HOLD1 Cf
VCM VCM
HOLD2
FBCL1
HOLD1
SAMP1
FBCL2
HOLD2
SAMP2
Set Cs and Cf for PGA1 Set Cs and Cf for PGA2 Set Cs and Cf for PGA1
0V
+ - VCM
Cf
0V
Vcm + - + -
Cs Vcm Vcm
Csum
CMFB
AMP
AMP
SAMP
Csum
Cs Vcm
Vcm
+ - - + Vcm
0V
Cf
- VCM
+
0V
summed differential output of the main amp to a common mode reference voltage
(Vcm). The CMFB amp affects the bias point of the main amp’s folded cascode output
to hold the center point of the differential output to the Vcm value.
During any SAMPLE cycle, the Csum caps are cleared. See Figure 6.13.
AVDD
Vbias4
M1 M2 M3
Vbias3
M4 M5
M6 M7
VOM VOP
+ M8 M9 –
AGND
AVDD
Vbias3
M1 M2 M3 M4
To Gain Stage
Folding Nodes
M5 M6
M7
SAMP HOLD SAMP 2W VREF
M8 M9
VOP VOM
W W
C C
M10
Vbias1
AGND
M8, and M9. Transistors M8 and M9 act to average any amplifier offset. They also
act as the differential, composite transistor to M7. During the hold phase, the SAMP
switches open and the HOLD switch closes. Transistors M8 and M9 are now in par-
allel with a composite gate input, which is the average of the output signals positive
output voltage (VOP) and negative output voltage (VOM).
FIGURE 6.16 Principle of the chopper technique. (Redrawn from Yoshida, T. et al., IEICE
Trans. Electron., E89C, 769–774, 2006.)
kT I C 2 AE1 1
I PTAT = ln (6.17)
q I C1 AE 2 R1
In the figure, for common-base bipolar transistors, the common-base current gain is
approximately the gain of current from emitters to collectors in the forward-active region,
and it can be shown by α = IC/IE. Therefore, Equation 6.17 is further described as:
kT α 2 I E 2 8 1
I PTAT = ln (6.18)
q α1I E1 1 R1
154 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Vdd
p1 p2 p3 p4
DEM
sp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 sp1 sp4 sp1 sp2 sp4
sp2 sp3 sp4 sp1 sp2 sp3 sp3
p6 p7 p8
p5
Vbias
Chopper VBE
R1 VBE
amplifier
IPTAT3 IPTAT4
Q1 Q2
8A 1A
where α1 and α2 are the current gain of transistors Q1 and Q2, and the emitter cur-
rents through transistors Q1 and Q2 are IE1 and IE2, respectively.
As Q1 and Q2 are the same transistors, α1 and α2 are equal. In order to gain
accuracy for the IPTAT current, the ratio of emitter current IE2/IE1 must be accurate.
Dynamic element matching is used to improve the current ratio accuracy. The work
process is shown in Figure 6.17. Four switch signals sp1–sp4 are produced by a
digital logical clock. When the first clock period comes, signal sp1 switches on.
The drain of transistor P1 connects the source of transistor P5. The current IPTAT1
passes the branch of transistor P5 and in the same way, the currents IPTAT2, IPTAT3, and
IPTAT4 flow into the branch of transistors P6–P8, respectively. When different switch
signals are effective, the relationship of conduction connection is shown in Table 6.1.
Using this method, the equation IE2/IE1 = 1 can be accomplished; therefore a current
that is proportional to absolute temperature can be attained.
Introduction of Advanced Analog Circuit 155
TABLE 6.1
Conduction–Connection Relationship During Different Switch Signals
On State Conduction Relationship
sp1 P1 drain–P5 source P2 drain–P6 source P3 drain–P7 source P4 drain–P8 source
sp2 P1 drain–P6 source P2 drain–P5 source P3 drain–P8 source P4 drain–P7 source
sp3 P1 drain–P7 source P2 drain–P8 source P3 drain–P5 source P4 drain–P6 source
sp4 P1 drain–P8 source P2 drain–P7 source P3 drain–P6 source P4 drain–P5 source
IPTAT
RSC M2 M1
sw3
clk
sw4
fREF CS2
clk
with average resistance RSC, which is equal to (CS2 · fREF)−1 between the source node
of transistor M2 and the ground. Therefore, adjusting an external reference clock with
frequency fREF, the resistance of the switched-capacitor resistor RSC can be enlarged.
Consequently, the circuit is operated with an ultra-low current, several hundred nano-
amperes or less, and the transistors M1 and M2 are operated in the subthreshold region.
In the circuit in Figure 6.18, gate-source voltage VGS1 in M1 is equal to the sum of
gate-source voltage VGS2 in M2 and the voltage drop (IPTAT · RSC ) across the switched-
capacitor resistor. The currents in M1 and M2 are equal, so the output current IPTAT of
the PTAT current generator is given by:
ηVT K 2 η kT K 2
I PTAT = ln = f REF CS 2 ln (6.19)
RSC K1 q
K1
where K is the aspect ratio (= W/L) of the transistor, V T is the thermal voltage, and η
is the subthreshold slope factor [8].
Vin (5V)
VREF (1.0 V)
Bandgap
Voltage PMOS1
VC
Level Converter 5V
VH
1.7 V
VL
LDO
VSL
PMOS2
Vin – 3.3 V VDD33
VLX
3.3 V Off Chip
0V
Vout (1.8 V)
Overlap
NMOS1 Lo
VDD33
R1
VFB +
Co VEA
3.3 V EA
R2 -
0V NMOS2
VREF (1.0 V)
-
QP QN R CMP
+ VH CP1
Dead-time Q Vramp OSC
S VL RP1
Vclk
Output Stage Pulse-Width Modulator
Off Chip
FIGURE 6.19 Switchmode converter. (Redrawn from Wang, C.C. et al., Microelectron. J.,
42, 1–9, 2011.)
The low dropout linear regulator is a voltage source to supply to the internal
circuitry and the generated reference voltage from the bandgap [3]. This internally
generated reference voltage, VREF, is compared with a feedback voltage, VFB, which
is the output voltage, Vout, divided by R1 and R2. A feedback circuit regulates the
switching in the switching output. The feedback circuit cancels out any errors in
the feedback voltage due to component or timing tolerance, and it adjusts the duty
cycle to compensate for changes in the load current. The result is a self-regulating
step-down buck converter that produces a stable LED voltage over constant currents.
A faster speed of the feedback loop comes along with a more stable load voltage.
The resulting current flow through the LEDs is a DC signal [9].
The error amplifier is used to amplify the difference between VREF and VFB.
The output of the error amplifier, VEA, is compared with Vramp to generate a PWM
control digital signal, Q. Typically, a high-frequency signal will be coupled with
the output voltage in a switched-mode power supply design. The low frequency
gain should be considered in this design with the filtered unwanted high-frequency
signals. Amplifiers with the higher bandwidth will amplify the unwanted control sig-
nal in the high-frequency range to cause the system loop to be unstable. Therefore,
1 MHz bandwidth is more than enough to cope with the switching frequency of the
switched-mode power supply design [10].
158 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Two non-overlapping signals, QP and QN, are generated from the dead-time
circuit. The voltage level converter [11] shifts the voltage level of QP and sends a
Control Voltage (VC) to be the gate drive of the power transistor (PMOS1).
The switching frequency is dependent on the input voltage and load current.
A higher switching frequency lowers the efficiency due to the increased switching
losses [12]. Input current magnitude can be controlled by the switching frequency.
This can be utilized for controlling the output voltage with the switching frequency.
It should be noted that the increasing switching frequency reduces output voltage and
vice versa [13]. The increase of switching frequency also increases the energy asso-
ciated with capacitive-coupled displacement, but high-frequency switching results
in smaller off-chip reactive components, which can be used, leading to more savings
on the bill-of-material. The bill-of-material can be even further reduced if off-chip
reactive components are eventually integrated. The resistive losses dominate at a low
frequency, while capacitive losses are dominant at high switching frequencies [14].
V (vinsp)
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.8 V (opm)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.8 V (opp)
0.6
V (V)
0.4
0.2
0.8 V (vinp)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.8 V (vinm)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 2.0x10-7 4.0x10-7
Time (s)
V (outp) - V (voutm)
1
-1
V (vinsm)
V (vinsp)
1.0 V (outm)
0.8 V (outp)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
V (V)
V (vopp)
1.0
0.5
0.0
V (vopm)
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 2.0x10-7 4.0x10-7
Time (s)
V (vinsp)
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.8 V (vopm)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.8 V (opp)
0.6
V (V)
0.4
0.2
0.8 V (vinp)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.8 V (vinm)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 2.0x10-7 4.0x10-7
Time (s)
the result. The simulation schematic uses the ideal opamp shown in Figure 6.26,
as the ideal opamp uses a voltage-dependent current source for better convergence.
The output voltage of the single-ended output is:
The ratio of the output voltage to the input voltage, gain, is therefore 100 Meg,
when R1 is 1 Ω. Figure 6.27 shows another S/H amplifier, but now with an opamp
(Chapter 3). Figure 6.28 shows the simulation result. Figure 6.29 shows the basic
residue amplifier for the Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC). The simulation result
is shown in Figure 6.30.
0.8 V (voutp)
V (vinsp)
0.6
V (V)
0.4
V (voutm)
V (vinsm)
0.2
0.0
0.0 1.0x10-6 2.0x10-6 3.0x10-6
Time (s)
1st run
0.5
0.0
-0.5
2nd run
0.5
0.0
-0.5
V(voutp)-V(voutm) (V)
3rd run
0.5
0.0
-0.5
4th run
0.5
0.0
-0.5
5th run
0.5
0.0
-0.5
0.0 1.0x10-6 2.0x10-6
Time (s)
6.13 SUMMARY
Resistor-less reference circuitry and Dynamic Element Matching (DEM) circuitry are
normally applicable for new applications or research. The standard S/H amplifier is a
typical practical amplifier for data converters. The chopper amplifier is widely popular
in low frequency application. It can also be applied for new circuitry or research.
REFERENCES
1. Baker, R. J. (2010). CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (3rd ed.). Wiley-
IEEE Press. doi:10.1002/9780470891179.
2. Gray, P. R., Hurst, P. J., Lewis, S. H., and Meyer, R. (2010). Analysis and Design of
Analog Integrated Circuits, 5th ed. New York: Wiley, pp. 811–821.
3. Allen, P. E., and Holberg, D. R. (2002). CMOS Analog Circuit Design, 2nd ed.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Introduction of Advanced Analog Circuit 165
4. Enz, C. C., Vittoz, E. A., and Krummenacher, F. (1987). A CMOS chopper amplifier.
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 22, 335–342.
5. Yoshida, T., Masui, Y., Mashimo, T., Sasaki, M., and Iwata, A. (2006). A 1V low-
noise CMOS amplifier using autozeroing and chopper stabilization technique. IEICE
Transactions on Electronics, E89C, 769–774.
6. Jiang, L., Xu, W., and Yu, Y. (2010). Accurate operation of a CMOS integrated tempera-
ture sensor. Microelectronics Journal, 41(12), 897–905.
7. Ueno, K., Asai, T., and Amemiya, Y. (2011). Low-power temperature-to-frequency con-
verter consisting of subthreshold CMOS circuits for integrated smart temperature sen-
sors. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 165(1), 132–137.
8. Wang, A., Calhoun, B. H., and Chandrakasan, A. P. (2006). Sub-threshold Design for
Ultra Low-Power Systems. New York: Springer.
9. Wang, C. C., Chen, C. L., Sung, G. N., and Wang, C. L. (2011). A high efficiency DC-DC
buck converter for sub 2xVDD power supply. Microelectronics Journal, 42, 1–9.
10. Luo, F., and Ma, D. (2010). Design of digital tri-mode adaptive-output buck-boost power
converter for power-efficient integrated systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Electronics, 57(6), 2151–2160.
11. Da Rocha, J. F., Dos Santos, M. B., Dores Costa, J. M., and Lima, F. A. (2008). Level
shifters and DCVSL for a low-voltage CMOS 4.2-V buck converter. IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, 55(9), 3315–3323.
12. Hogue, M. R., Ahmad, T., McNutt, T. R., Mantooth, H. A., and Mojarradi, M. M.
(2006). A technique to increase the efficiency of high voltage charge pumps. IEEE
Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 53, 364–368.
13. Liu Xin, Guo Shu-xu, Chang Yu-chun, Zhu Shun-dong, Wang Shuai. (2009). Simple digi-
tal PWM and PSM controlled DC-DC boost converter for luminance-regulated WLED
driver. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 16, 98–102.
14. Emira, A., Carr, F., Elwan, H., and Mekky. R. H. (2009). High voltage tolerant inte-
grated Buck converter in 65 nm 2.5 V CMOS. Proceeding of IEEE International
Symposium on Circuits and Systems (pp. 2405–2408).
7 Data Converter
7.1 INTRODUCTION
A digital-to-analog converter (DAC) and analog-to-digital converter (ADC) can be
described as a mixed-signal integrated circuit.
Resolution is a term used to describe a minimum voltage or current that an ADC/
DAC can resolve. The fundamental limit is a quantization noise due to the finite
number of bits used in the ADC/DAC. In an N-bit ADC, the minimum incremental
input voltage of Vref /2N can be resolved with a full-scale input range of Vref. That
is, limited 2N digital codes are available to represent the continuous analog input.
Similarly, in an N-bit DAC, 2N input digital codes can generate distinct output levels
separated by Vref /2N with a full-scale output range of Vref . An alternative definition of
the resolution is the effective number of bits (ENOB), which is defined by:
SNDR − 1.76
ENOB = bits (7.1)
6.02
The other important parameters are of course speed and power consumption.
These issues are presented in later sections.
VDD
2R
VOUT
b4
CL RL
R
2R
b3
R
2R
b2
R
2R
b1
2R
b0
2R
VDD
VDD
This simplified to
Bias
b RLL RRL
RLL RRL
Current-source-based cell.
7.2.3 Hybrid Topology
DACs are used to provide an interface between the digital data sequence and the
analog signal. Many conventional DAC architectures had been developed to con-
vert a digital data sequence in binary to an analog signal in terms of current or
voltage, including weighted current-steering DAC, binary-weighted resistor DAC,
and thermometer coding DAC. Each of the conventional DAC architecture has its
pros and cons. Therefore, each of the conventional DAC has different limitations
in static and dynamic performance, including linearity, monotonicity, and glitch
energy.
The hybrid DAC architecture is developed in order to achieve most of the advan-
tages and the least of the disadvantages from the conventional DAC architectures.
The switchable current source [1] is made of three P-type metal-oxide semicon-
ductor (PMOS) transistors, and its interconnection is shown in Figure 7.3. With the
lower mobility of holes as compared to that of electrons, the PMOS transistor pro-
vides a lower 1/f-noise, but a higher thermal noise level than the N-type metal-oxide
semiconductor (NMOS) transistor.
170 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Switchable AVDD
Current Source
VBIAS1 M1
1x
From Bias
Voltage
Generator
VBIAS2 M2
. provide a constant
current I = 20 µA
1x
DVS(2) M3 20µA
1x
AGND IOUT
FIGURE 7.3 Switchable current source. (Redrawn from Ab-Aziz, M.T.S. et al., J. Circ.
Syst. Comput., 20, 709–716, 2011.)
The binary-weighted resistor string is used in the LSB segment of the hybrid
DAC. The value of each resistor is proportional to the weighted digital input bit
value. Figure 7.4 shows an example of a 3-bit LSB structure. When the input is a “0”
or a low logic level, the switchable current source switched ON and a constant cur-
rent with magnitude I flows through the resistor string. Since the value of resistors
increases exponentially as the digital input bit increases, the outputs can be calcu-
lated by using the superposition theorem.
The simplified 3-bit mathematical model is:
( )
Vout = 22 D [ 2] + 21 D [1] + 20 D [ 0 ] ( I × R ) (7.2)
(
Vout = 27 D [ 7] + 26 D [6] + 25 D [5] + 24 D [ 4 ] + 23 D [3] + 22 D [ 2]
(7.3)
+ 21 D [1] + 20 D [ 0 ] ) ( I × R)
where I is a constant current source, R is the least significant bit resistor, and D is
the input bit, which is “1” for a high level and “0” for a low level. The equivalent
resistance used for the 8-bit binary-weighted resistor for the LSB segment of DAC is:
Vout = 7 (i x R ) = 7 LSB
DVS(2) i
2R i x 2R
DVS(1) i
R 2i x R
+
DVS(0) i
R 3i x R
AGND
1 LSB – i x R
Figure 7.5 shows a thermometer coding approach is used in the top or MSB seg-
ment of the hybrid DAC. The thermometer coding is using a 4-to-16 priority coding
scheme, which is converting N-bit of digital input to 2N − 1 number of bits in ther-
mometer code. This results in the conversion of 4-bit MSB digital input to a 15-bit
thermometer code, as shown in Table 7.1. Each of the bits in thermometer code is
connected directly to two switchable current sources. When the bit in thermometer
code is “1” or high logic level, it will turn ON the switchable current sources and the
sum of the currents will flow to the weighted resistor string. The total output cor-
responding to the 4 MSB segment is:
(
Vout = D [11] (16 I × 128R ) + D [10 ] ( 8I × 128R ) + D [9] ( 4 I × 128R )
(7.5)
+ D [8] ( 2II × 128R ) )
or
( )
Vout = 211 D 11 + 210 D 10 + 29 D 9 + 28 D 8 ( I × R ) (7.6)
172 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
DVS(11)
8x
DVS(10)
4x
DVS(9)
2x
DVS(8)
DVS(7)
64R
DVS(6) 32R
DVS(5) 16R
DVS(4) 8R
DVS(3)
4R
DVS(2)
2R
DVS(1) R
Thermometer
Coding DVS(0)
R
Binary-Weighted
Resistor
GND
TABLE 7.1
Thermometer Coding for the 4 MSB Segment
D[11] D[10] D[9] D[8] Thermometer Coding
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The completed model of the analog output voltage for the l2-bit hybrid DAC archi-
tecture from Equations 7.3 and 7.6 is:
VDD
VDD = VREF+
R
2R Rbig
To op-amp
+ input
b4
R
R
Adjustable
2R voltage
b3
R
2R
Selected large so it doesn’t
b2 load the R-2R ladder and
R so we get a large
2R attenuation to the output
b1
2R
b0
2R
VOUT VOUT
INL error
Ideal curve
FIGURE 7.7 Showing how INL can be seen as an offset error: (a) DAC transfer curves
before calibration and (b) DAC transfer curves after offset calibration.
Data Converter 175
VOUT
VOUT
INL
FIGURE 7.8 Showing gain error and how it can cause problems in an offset calibration: (a)
DAC transfer curves with gain error and (b) DAC transfer curves after offset calibration with
gain error.
Figure 7.8 shows the gain error and how it can cause problems in an offset
calibration.
Obviously, a serious study should be conducted in order to determine the method
of calibration or trimming for a DAC.
7.2.5 Glitch
Among the factors that contribute to the glitch phenomenon are matching errors
in switches and driver circuits, or time skew between switching signals, voltage-
dependent complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) switches, etc. For a
short period of time, a false code could appear at the output. For example, for 3-bits
binary code DAC, when the digital input changes from 011 to 100, if the MSB switch
is turned on earlier than the other switches, the intermediate state 111 will appear
during the process of the transformation of the switch signals and at the output ter-
minal a glitch will appear [2].
Glitches can be characterized by measuring the glitch impulse area, some-
times called glitch energy. The term glitch energy is a misnomer, since the unit for
glitch impulse area is volt-seconds (or more probably µV-seconds or pV-seconds).
The peak glitch area is the area of the largest of the positive or negative glitch
areas. The glitch impulse area is the net area under the voltage-versus-time curve
and can be estimated by approximating the waveforms by triangles, computing
the areas, and subtracting the negative area from the positive area, as shown in
Figure 7.9 [3].
FIGURE 7.9 Calculating glitch impulse area. (Redrawn from Zumbahlen, H., Linear
Circuit Design Handbook, Analog Devices-Newnes, Boston, MA, 2008.)
pixel’s comparator inverting (“−”) input. The non-inverting (“+”) input on each com-
parator is directly connected to the sense node. The globally distributed gray-coded
counter values, shown as a stepped “digital ramp,” are simultaneously applied to
the per-pixel memory bit lines. At the beginning of the conversion, the ramp volt-
age is lowered to just below the lowest expected sense node voltage, which sets the
comparator output to high. This enables the per-pixel memory to begin loading the
gray code values. The ramp is then swept linearly until it exceeds the reset voltage.
Simultaneously, the gray code counter sweeps across an equivalent set of values
(256 for 8 bits). As the ramp crosses each pixel’s sense node voltage, its comparator
output switches low, and the gray code value present at that moment is latched in the
pixel’s memory. At the end of the conversion, each pixel’s memory contains an 8-bit
gray-coded value that is a digital representation of its input voltage. Although using
a linear ramp is the typical approach, it is possible to use alternative ramp profiles,
such as piecewise linear or exponential curves that compress or expand different
illumination ranges. It is also possible to change the gain of the ADC conversion by
changing the voltage range of the analog ramp. One may also use alternate sequences
for the digital inputs using the auxiliary inputs.
the second bit is set to 0, and the third bit decision is made by comparing the input
with 5Vref /8. This comparison continues until all the bits are decided. Therefore, the
N-bit successive-approximation ADC requires N + 1 clock cycles to complete one
sample conversion.
of bits grows, the comparator bank presents a significant loading to the input S/H,
diminishing the speed advantage of this architecture. Also, the control of the refer-
ence divider accuracy and the comparator resolution degrades, and the power con-
sumption becomes prohibitively high.
7.3.4 Pipelined ADC
Each bit in a general 1-bit-per-stage-pipelined A/D converter is achieved using the
same algorithm. So, to get an arbitrary number of bits, a number of algorithmic
stages can be cascaded to create an arbitrary number of bits—up to the accuracy of
the circuits and silicon processing, which is usually around 10 bits.
The input range of such a converter can be defined as −VREF to +VREF, where |VREF|
is the reference voltage.
The way a single-bit stage in a pipeline converter works, in the simplest form,
is to compare the input voltage to zero volts. If the input voltage is greater than
zero, then the bit for that stage is a “1,” otherwise, the bit is a “0.” At the same
time, the input voltage is multiplied by 2. If the bit decision had been a “1,” then
a value equal to the reference voltage is subtracted from the multiplication result,
otherwise, if the bit decision had been a “0,” a value equal to the reference voltage
is added to the multiplication result. The analog result from a bit stage is called
the residue and is passed onto the next bit stage. Figure 7.13 shows an example of
a 1-bit-per-stage pipeline converting 5-bits. Note that the last stage does not need a
residue amplifier in order to make a decision for the last bit. All that is required is a
comparator. Checking the algorithm illustrated by Figure 7.13, we get for the input
voltage ratio, ( 0.3VREF + VREF ) / VREF = 0.65, while for the output digital word ratio,
10100/25=0.625, so the error in LSB is (0.625 – 0.650)/25 = −0.8 LSB.
The explained pipeline algorithm is simple and can be expanded to any number
of bits, however, the comparator used in each stage must be as accurate as the bit
resolution. One way to reduce the accuracy requirement of the comparators is to add
redundancy to the system. A common way to do this is to use an extra comparator
at each stage and make two comparisons around zero rather than one comparison at
zero. This allows each comparator to exhibit large errors, but still allows the overall
pipeline to arrive at the correct analog-to-digital conversion. This is done by tak-
ing the extra information provided by two comparators at each stage and applying
the digital error correction. Using the digital error correction, nominal comparator
decision points are placed at ±¼VREF , as shown in Figure 7.14. Since the comparator
error bands cannot overlap, a comparator error of up to ±¼VREF can be tolerated,
greatly reducing the accuracy requirement of the comparators. Looking intuitively
at the information from the comparators, when neither comparator output is true, the
bit is definitely a zero.
When both comparator outputs are true, the bit is definitely a one. When one com-
parator is true and the other is not true, the input lies somewhere between ±½VREF,
and a bit decision cannot reliably be made. This is because the input signal might
have been above or below zero. To deal with this uncertainty, a bit value of 0.5 is
assigned for input values that lie in the range ±½VREF . Additionally for this case, the
value of VREF is neither added nor subtracted from the multiply-by-2 result. The add
or subtract step can be avoided because, since the input initially lies in the range
±½VREF, the multiply-by-2 step will yield an output that is still within the allowable
±VREF output range of the residue amplifier. In fact, the add or subtract step should be
avoided because no bit decision has yet been made and adding or subtracting a value
of VREF could push output value outside the ±VREF range of the residue amplifier.
Taking again the example of Figure 7.13, except this time with the error correction
algorithm:
As seen in Figure 7.15, the input signal of stage 3 happens to fall between the
comparison levels of ±¼VREF, and an output value of 0.5 was assigned. Also, in
stage 3, a multiply-by-2 was performed, but no addition or subtraction of VREF was
performed. The last stage of the pipeline again has a decision level at exactly zero
in order to properly resolve the least significant bit. Again, this last comparison at
zero needs only to have a resolution of ±¼VREF because any input signal within that
resolution about the zero point will result in a quantization error of at most ±½LSB.
Since each stage has an effective resolution of one and a half bits, there are three
valid digital output levels before the digital error correction:
00: definitely a 0
01: uncertainty around a 0
11: definitely a 1
The digital error correction algorithm applied to the resulting bits is termed “bit-
overlap correction” because the results from all the stages are simply summed
together by overlapping bits from adjacent stages, as shown in Figure 7.16. Comparing
the final output word of the general pipeline algorithm with that of the pipelined
algorithm with the digital error correction, they are identical.
This ADC topology, as shown in Figure 7.17, is suitable for chip-level ADC [11].
The 1.5-bit stage is normally used in designing pipelined ADCs [12], thus requires
182 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
only trilevel DACs [9]; this is described in Figure 7.18. Each stage is responsible for
resolving two bits from the digital output code. Each stage is composed of a coarse
flash-ADC, a low-resolution DAC, an S/H circuit, and a residue amplifier. The 2-bit
MSB low-resolution ADC determines the two MSBs. This is the first stage. The
determination of the remaining LSBs is performed in the following steps: (1) The
quantization error is found by reconverting the 2-bit digital to an analog value using
the 2-bit DAC. (2) This value is subtracted from the input signal, generating a resi-
due. This residue is then amplified by a gain of two and passed onto the next stage.
The second stage performs similar operations on the amplified residue, resulting
in a determination of the next most significant bits of the input signal. The stages
Data Converter 183
A if : < -¼ VREF
+
+¼ VREF B if :
- B
Coding 3 A C < -¼ VREF > VIN > +¼ VREF
Logic C if : VIN > +¼ VREF
+
-¼ VREF
- +½ VREF 0 -½ VREF
2
Residue Amplifier
1.5 bits to digital error correction
are buffered by switching-capacitors gain blocks that provide an S/H between each
stage, allowing concurrent processing. The digital error correction [13,14] is used to
generate the final correct output code. The use of a digital error correction technique
in conjunction with a low number of bits per stage relaxes the constraints on the
comparator offset voltage.
The pipelined-ADC stage consists of: (1) two comparators with corresponding
threshold voltages Vref /4 and −Vref /4, which, in fact, assemble the coarse flash-ADC,
(2) an analog MUX that actually functions as a DAC, with the three corresponding
reference voltages −Vref, 0, and Vref, and (3) residue gain stage [15,16]. The residue-
gain stage samples the signal input, subtracts it from the relevant reference voltage,
and amplifies the residue by the gain of two. Figure 7.19 shows another circuit of
coarse ADC and DAC for the 1.5-bit stage. MUX is used as the DAC, where the
output of the MUX is either 0, VCM, or 2VCM. This output is connected to the residue
amplifier common mode input. Figure 7.20 shows the transfer curve of the circuit in
Figure 7.19 with a residue amplifier. Figures 7.21 and 7.22 show the complete resi-
due amplifier. The subtraction or addition is done with the VCI inputs to the circuit,
as shown in Figure 7.21. The equation that ideally relates to Vout to Vin in terms of VCI
is given by:
+ 00 01 11
-
0 2VCM= VDD
2 VCM
VCI+
Vin-
-
Mux
(b) + ab
2 00 01 11
3 0 VCM 2VCM
- ab 11 01 00
4
Vin+ Mux
+
VCI-
FIGURE 7.19 Implementing coarse ADC and DAC for 1.5 bits : (a) Single-ended input and
output and (b) double-ended input.
FIGURE 7.20 Transfer curves for using 1.5-bits per clock cycle: (a) single-ended input and
output and (b) double-ended input and output.
Data Converter 185
Φh
Φa
Φa Φh Φ s
C+ Φs
C+ +∆C+
VCI+ Vin+ - + Vout+
VCI- + - Vout-
Vin- C- +∆C-
C- Φs
Φa
Φh
valid
Sample Sample
Φs
Φa Amplify
Φh
Hold
(average)
valid
FIGURE 7.21 Residue amplifier 1. (Redrawn from Baker, R.J., CMOS: Circuit Design,
Layout, and Simulation, 3rd ed., Wiley-IEEE Press, 2010.)
FIGURE 7.22 Residue amplifier 2. (Redrawn from Baker, R.J., CMOS: Circuit Design,
Layout, and Simulation, 3rd ed., Wiley-IEEE Press, 2010.)
186 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
TABLE 7.2
ADC-Type Performances
Topology Latency Speed Accuracy Area
Flash Low High Low High
SAR Low Low–medium Medium–high Low
Delta-sigma High Low High Medium
Pipeline High Medium–high Medium–high Medium
Slope Low Low High Low
In summary, the column-level ADC topology is a popular choice for the CMOS
image sensor due to good trade-off between readout speed, silicon area, and power
consumption [20].
Table 7.2 shows the ADC-type performances.
7.4.2 ADC Example
Figure 7.28 shows the 1.5-bit stage simulation schematic. The results are shown in
Figure 7.29.
Data Converter 187
VREF+
R = RF
VDD
0 2R
MSB _
1 VOUT
bN-1
+
R
2R
bN-2
0 VREF+
2R Detail
1
bN-3
To resistor
0 bN-2
2R
1
b1
R VREF-
0 2R
LSB
1
b0
2R
VREF-
VOUT
VOUT
DC + VOS
+ VOS
VCM - VOS Digital input code
(a)
(b)
FIGURE 7.25 Showing how an op-amp offset affects the DACs transfer curves: (a) showing
offset voltage in an op-amp and (b) DAC transfer curves showing offset.
188 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
dacvout
1.0
dacvout (V)
0.5
0.0
0 1x10-5 2x10-5
Time (s)
V(vinm1)
0.8 V(vinp1)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
V(b1p51)
1.0
0.5
0.0
V(a1p51)
1.0
V (V)
0.5
0.0
V(vinp2)-V(vinm2)
1
0
-1
V(vinm2)
1.0 V(vinp2)
0.5
0.0
7.6 SUMMARY
In this chapter, many examples of DACs and ADCs are presented, which are very
much practical for the mixed-signal integrated circuits. The speed, power consump-
tion, and resolution are parameters that should be improved in any design of data
converters. Floor planning is important for data converters. The noise of the digital
circuit should be contained. A separate power pad between the analog and digital
circuit should be considered. The substrate is considered the analog ground or the
quiet plane. So, the substrate should not be connected to the digital ground. More of
this is discussed in the next chapter.
REFERENCES
1. Ab-Aziz, M. T. S., Marzuki, A., and Aziz, Z. A. A. (2011). 12-bit pseudo-differential
current-source resistor-string hybrid DAC. Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers
(JCSC), 20(4), 709–716.
2. Cheng, K.-H., Wang, H.-H., and Huang, D.-J. (2008). A 1-V 10-bit 2G sample/s D/A con-
verter based on precision current reference in 90-nm CMOS. 15th IEEE International
Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems 2008, ICECS 2008 (pp. 340–343).
3. Zumbahlen, H. (2008). Linear Circuit Design Handbook. Boston, MA: Analog
Devices-Newnes.
4. Suzuki, A., Shimamura, N., Kainuma, T., Kawazu, N., Okada, C., Oka, T., and
Wakabayashi, H. (2015). A 1/1.7 inch 20Mpixel back illuminated stacked CMOS image
sensor for new imaging application. ISSCC 2015 (pp. 110–112).
5. Kleinfelder, S., Lim, S., Liu, X., and El Gamal, A. (2001). A 10000 frames/s CMOS
digital pixel sensor. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 36(12), 2049–2059.
6. Takayanagi, I., Yoshimura, N., Sato, T., Matsuo, S., Kawaguchi, T., Mori, K., and
Nakamura, J. (2013). A 1-inch optical format, 80fps, 10.8Mpixel CMOS image sensor
operating in a pixel-to-ADC pipelined sequence mode. Proceedings of International
Image Sensor Workshop (pp. 325–328).
7. Deguchi, J., Tachibana, F., Morimoto, M., Chiba, M., Miyaba, T., and Tanaka, H.
K. T. (2013). A 187.5 µVrms-read-noise 51mW 1.4Mpixel CMOS image sensor with
PMOSCAP column CDS and 10b self-differential offset-cancelled pipeline SAR-ADC.
ISSCC (pp. 494–496).
8. Zhao, W., Wang, T., Pham, H., Hu-Guo, C., Dorokhov, A., and Hu, Y. (2014).
Development of CMOS pixel sensors with digital pixel dedicated to future particle
physics experiments. Journal of Instrumentation, 9(2), C02004–C02004.
9. Song, B. (2000). Nyquist-rate ADC and DAC. In VLSI Handbook, E. W. Chen (Ed.).
CRC Press, Florida.
10. Loinaz, M. J., Singh, K. J., Blanksby, A. J., Member, S., Inglis, D. A., Azadet, K., and
Ackland, B. D. (1998). A 200-mW, 3.3-V, CMOS color camera IC producing 352 × 288
24-b video at 30 frames/s. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 33(12), 2092–2103.
11. Hamami, S., Fleshel, L., Yadid-pecht, O., and Driver, R. (2004). CMOS Aps Imager
Employing 3.3V 12 bit 6.3 ms/s pipelined ADC. Proceedings of the 2004 International
Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS’04 (pp. 960–963).
12. Abdul Aziz, Z. A., and Marzuki, A. (2010). Residual folding technique adopting
switched capacitor residue amplifiers and folded cascode amplifier with novel PMOS
isolation for high speed pipelined ADC applications. 3rd AUN/SEED-Net Regional
Conference in Electrical and Electronics Engineering: International Conference on
System on Chip Design Challenges (ICoSoC 2010) (pp. 14–17).
194 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
13. Lewis, S. H., Fetterman, H. S., Gross, G. F. Jr., Ramachandran, R., Viswanathan, T. R.,
and Viswanathan, T. R. (1992). 10-b 20-Msample/s analog-to-digital converter. IEEE
Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 27, 351–358.
14. Cho, T., and Gray, P. R. (1995). A 10b 20MSamples/s 35mW pipeline A/D converter.
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 30, 166–172.
15. Abo, A., and Gray, P. R. (1995). A 1.5-V, 10-bit, 14.3-MS/s CMOS pipeline analog-to-
digital converter. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 34(5), 599–606.
16. Baker, R. J. (2010). CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (3rd ed.). Wiley-
IEEE Press. doi:10.1002/9780470891179.
17. Norsworthy, S. R., Schreier, R., and Temes, G. C. (Eds.). (1997). Delta-sigma Data
Converters: Theory, Design, and Simulation (Vol. 97). New York: IEEE Press.
18. Mahmoodi, A., and Joseph, D. (2008). Pixel-level delta-sigma ADC with optimized
area and power for vertically-integrated image sensors. Proceedings of the 51st Midwest
Symposium on Circuits and Systems MWSCAS’08 (pp. 41–44).
19. Chae, Y., Cheon, J., Lim, S., Kwon, M., Yoo, K., Jung, W., and Han, G. (2011). A 2.1 M
pixels, 120 frame/s CMOS image sensor ADC architecture with column-parallel delta
sigma ADC architecture. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 46(1), 236–247.
20. Lyu, T., Yao, S., Nie, K., and Xu, J. (2014). A 12-bit high-speed column-parallel two-
step single-slope analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for CMOS image sensors. Sensors
(Basel), 14(11), 21603–21625.
8 CMOS Color and Image
Sensor Circuit Design
8.1 INTRODUCTION
An image sensing optical receiver, such as complementary metal-oxide semiconduc-
tor (CMOS) image sensors (CIS), in general, is comprised of photodiode, analog, and
mixed-signal circuits to amplify small photocurrents into digital signals. The CMOS
image sensors are now the technology of choice for most imaging applications, such
as digital video cameras, scanners, and numerous others. Even though their sensitiv-
ity does not reach one of the best actual charge-coupled device CCD’s (whose fill
factor is about 100%), they are now commonly used because of their multiple func-
tionalities and their easy fabrication.
Three types of the topology of CMOS color sensors are discussed, namely,
the transimpedance amplifier (TIA), light to frequency converter, and light
integrating.
195
196 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
important when a process is selected for CIS development. Because of these limi-
tations, a new circuit technique is introduced:
1. An old circuit, such as a standard pixel circuit cannot be used when using
0.1 micron and lower [2]. This is due to the topology which requires high
voltage; because the maximum supply voltage is now lower.
2. Calibration circuit and cancellation circuit are normally employed to reduce
noises.
In order to increase the resolution into multi-megapixel and hundreds of frame rate,
lower dimension technology is normally chosen. Evidently, it has been reported
that 0.13 micron [3] and 0.18 micron [4] are good enough to achieve good imaging
performance.
These modifications of the CMOS process have started at 0.25 micron and below
to improve their imaging characteristics. As process scaling is going to be much lower
than 0.25 micron and below, several fundamental parameters are degraded, namely,
photo responsivity and dark current. Therefore, the modifications are focused on
mitigating these parameter degradations [2,5]. System requirements (such as supply
voltage and temperature) are also one of the criteria in selecting a suitable process.
The price of tool and development costs will also determine the process selection.
A description of pixel size vs. CIS technology is shown in Figure 8.1 [6].
8.2.2 Backside Illumination
BSI technology eliminates the need to push light through the layers of metal inter-
connections. With this, high quantum efficiency can be achieved. However, this tech-
nology incurs additional costs due to extra processes, such as stacking and through
silicon via. A pixel of 1.1 micron seems to be the tipping point advantage over fron-
tside illumination [7]. A work in [8] uses BSI to improve the resolution through the
pixel size. As the BSI is targeted for very small pixel, process such as 90 nm is pre-
ferred, of course this is a very expensive process, and thus this CMOS image sensor
is meant for expensive application (e.g., high-end camera).
8.2.3 Photo Devices
The typical photo detector devices are photodiode and phototransistor. Typical pho-
todiode devices are N+/Psub, P+/N_well, N_well/Psub, and P+/N_well/Psub (back-
to-back diode) [9]. Phototransistor devices are P+/n_well/Psub (vertical transistor),
P+/N_well/P+ (lateral transistor), and N_well/gate (tied phototransistor) [9].
These standard photo devices still require a micro lens and color filter array.
The quantum efficiency of photodiodes in a standard CMOS is usually below
0.3 [10].
The devices which are normally developed for the modified CMOS process are
a photogate, pinned photodiode, and amorphous silicon diode. These devices will
improve the sensitivity of the CIS. A pinned photodiode, which has a low dark cur-
rent, offers good imaging characteristics for the CIS [11].
The photodevices exhibit the parasitic capacitance, which should be considered
during the design process. An example of the parasitic capacitance of N_well/Psub is:
The amplifier gain is normally huge, and this will increase the current consumption.
FIGURE 8.4 Light to frequency sensor. (a) schematic diagram and (b) timing diagram.
measure or calculate the frequency [16]. Figure 8.4 shows [15] an example of the
sensor. The time or duration of the ramp signal is:
∆V
∆t = CINT × . (8.3)
i photo
TABLE 8.1
Description of the I/O of the Proposed Design
Name Type Description
VDDA P Analog supply. Nominal 2.6V
VSSA P Analog ground
PDASZ[3:0] DI Photodiode size
CAPSZ[7:0] DI Capacitor select
CHSEL[2:0] DI Channel select
INTGR DI Integrating control signal
PRECHARGE DI Precharge control signal
EN_SINGLE DI Select 7 bit mode (active high)
CLK_ADC DI ADC clock
ADC_PD DI ADC power down pin (active high)
AMP_PD DI Amplifier power down (active high)
BG_PD DI Bandgap power down (active high)
DARKVCM_SEL DI Select normal Vcm (active high)
ATESTSEL[8:0] DI Analog test control signal (TSTMUX)
Photodiode pins ANA Photodiode connection
ANA1 ANA TEST PIN1
ANA0 ANA TEST PIN2
ADCDATAOUT[7:0] D0 ADC data out
I photodiode × Tintegration
Vin = Vprecharge − (8.4)
Cint
where Vprecharge is the voltage across the integration capacitor, Cint. The voltage is
provided by the REFERENCE block. Iphotodiode is the photocurrent, and Tintegration is
the integration time.
From Equation 8.4, when the light incident on the photodiode is pulse width
modulation (PWM) light, the integration phase (see Figure 8.6) is synchronized
to a multiple of the PWM periods, then the voltage, Vin, is inversely proportional
to the PWM duty cycle. A single to differential amplifier (sigdiff ) is then used to
produce the differential voltages for the differential input ADC; these values are
later sampled by the sample/hold (S/H) amplifier. In the single to differential cir-
cuit (sigdiff), a compensated common mode voltage is used for the dark current
cancellation. The sampled values are held for analog to digital conversion. At the
same time, the Cint is charged back to the Vprecharge value. A pipeline ADC with
the 8-bit resolution is used for analog to digital conversion. The ADC can receive
202 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
±1.2 V, i.e., differential input voltages with the nominal voltage (common mode
voltage) of 1.2 V. The relationship of voltages and the ADC output is described
in Equation 8.5:
where inp is the positive input of the ADC, inm is the negative input of the ADC,
and Vref is the reference voltage. For the output of 0 DEC, the differential voltage is
−1.2 V (e.g., inp = 0. 6 V, inm = 1.8 V), while for the output 256 DEC (28), the dif-
ferential voltage is 1.2 V.
Both Equations 8.4 and 8.5 show that the concept is capable of integrating several
functions (gain stage and LPF) into a single silicon. The REFERENCE block is
used to generate bias voltages (e.g., bandgap voltage (VBG) or Vcm) and bias cur-
rents for internal usage, such as the voltage to precharge the Cint. The design also
includes extensive routing for testability. Each block’s input can be overridden, and
each block’s output can be measured. This allows an efficient means of debugging
the signal chain within the design should the need arise.
TABLE 8.2
ADC Choice of Location in CIS
Pixel-Level ADC Column-Level ADC Chip-Level ADC
Power Low [20] Medium [3] High
Area Fill factor low Area medium High
Speed (Frame Rate) Highest Medium Limited by ADC
Noise Elimination of temporal noise [5] Medium Low
CMOS Color and Image Sensor Circuit Design 203
sensors acquire multiple pictures using different exposures, and then, off-chip pro-
cessing is done to recombine them in one image. This concept is shown in Figure 8.7.
The topology in Figure 8.7 is similar to memory architecture.
Row decoders
Row drivers
Pixel
Control
array
Ref
Comparators
Reference
voltage
Counters
Image Output
Column TSVs Processing I/F
Newly developed
Stacked BI-CIS
Pixels
Circuits
Logic process
Substrate (Si)
where q is the charge of an electron and Cint is a capacitor used for light integration.
The noise in the electron rms is:
kT Cint
σ= (8.7)
Cint q
where k is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature. The noise is typically
decreased by reducing the integration capacitance.
A typical dynamic range of a pixel is given by:
VOUTMAX − VOUTMIN
DR = (8.8)
FC
where the VOUTMAX − VOUTMIN is the output voltage range of the pixel circuit.
A low fixed pattern noise capacitive TIA (CTIA) for the active pixel CMOS
image sensors with a high switchable gain and low read noise is shown in
Figure 8.12. The low fixed pattern noise CTIA active pixel sensor uses a switched
capacitor voltage divider feedback circuit to achieve a high sensitivity, low gain
fixed pattern noise, and low read noise. The circuit consists of a transconduc-
tance amplifier TA1, a photodiode, a network of feedback capacitors and switches
(Cl, C2, Cf, Ml, and M2), and a bit line select transistor M3. WORD is used to
206 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
select each row of pixels, BIT is the output bus for each column in the sensor,
RESET and GAIN are used to reset the pixel and control the pixel gain, and VREF
is the pixel bias voltage.
Another circuit is shown in Figure 8.13. The integration capacitor, Cint, is used as
a feedback component. The photocurrent now is coming from Cint, and Vdiode remains
constant throughout the integration period.
(
k V + −V −
I + − I − = I sensortanh
) (8.9)
2VT
FIGURE 8.16 Analog circuit of DPS. (Redrawn from Zhang, M. and Bermak, A., IEEE
Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst., 18, 490–500, 2010.)
where k is the gate coupling efficiency into the transistor surface potential (typically
0.6–0.8) and V T is kT/q. If the difference of V + − V − is small, the Equation 8.9 is:
(
k V+ −V−
I + − I − = Isensor
) (8.10)
2VT
1. At pixel level: The thermal noise can be reduced by correlated double sam-
pling and oversampling. The flicker noise is reduced by using a large device,
periodically biasing the transistor, and proper PMOS substrate voltage bias-
ing [33]. Further discussion of flicker noise is already discussed in Chapter 2.
2. Column level: The off-chip calibration can be used to reduce fixed pattern
noise as discussed in work [4]. The calibration is done to select suitable
capacitor weights in the SAR ADC.
3. ADC level: The kT/C noise is reduced by selecting a suitable value for Cf
and Cs of the S/H circuit and buffer [34]. See more discussion in Chapter 6.
4. Photodiode level: The high conversion gain helps to reduce referred-to-
input noise [35]. This idea is mentioned in Section 8.4.2
Vout
0.8
Vout (V)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.0 2.0x10-5 4.0x10-5 6.0x10-5
Time (s)
6 V (row)
4
2
0
6 V (reset)
4
2
0
V(out)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
4 V (vphoto)
3
2
1
0
I (iphoto)
1.0x10-6
5.0x10-7
0.0
0.0 5.0x10-8 1.0x10-7
Time (s)
8.6 LAYOUT
The floorplan of a color sensor is shown in Figure 8.22.
Figure 8.23 shows the photodiode, and Figure 8.24 shows the layout of dark cur-
rent cancellation.
FIGURE 8.24 Layout of CMOS color sensor with dark current cancellation: (a) Floorplan,
(b) IC layout, and (c) IC microphotograph.
8.7 SUMMARY
This chapter describes the techniques in the circuit design of the CMOS color and
image sensor. The topology such as TIA and light to frequency are popular topolo-
gies for the practical CMOS color sensor. However, the light integrating technique
has been applied to a digital CMOS color sensor, which is suitable for PWM-ed light.
There is still room for improvement for both color and image sensors, especially on
the dynamic range and power consumption.
REFERENCES
1. Wong, H. P. (1997). CMOS Image sensors - Recent advances and device scaling consid-
erations. IEDM (pp. 201–204).
2. Bigas, M., Cabruja, E., Forest, J., and Salvi, J. (2006). Review of CMOS image sensors.
Microelectronics Journal, 37(5), 433–451.
3. Takayanagi, I., Yoshimura, N., Sato, T., Matsuo, S., Kawaguchi, T., Mori, K., and
Nakamura, J. (2013). A 1-inch optical format, 80fps, 10.8Mpixel CMOS image sensor
operating in a pixel-to-ADC pipelined sequence mode. Proceedings of International
Image Sensor Workshop (pp. 325–328).
214 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
4. Xu, R., Ng, W. C., Yuan, J., Yin, S., and Wei, S. (2014). A 1/2.5 inch VGA 400 fps
CMOS image sensor with high sensitivity for machine vision. IEEE Journal of Solid-
State Circuits, 49(10), 2342–2351.
5. El Gamal, A. (2002). Trends in CMOS image sensor technology and design. Electron
Devices Meeting (pp. 805–808).
6. Hwang, S. H. (2012). CMOS image sensor: Current status and future perspectives.
Retrieved from http://www.techonline.com.
7. Aptina. (2010). An Objective Look at FSI and BSI. Aptina White Paper.
8. Sukegawa, S., Umebayashi, T., Nakajima, T., Kawanobe, H., Koseki, K., Hirota, I., and
Fukushima, N. (2013). A 1/4-inch 8Mpixel back-illuminated stacked CMOS image sen-
sor. Proceedings of ISSCC (pp. 484–486).
9. Ardeshirpour, Y., Deen, M. J., and Shirani, S. (2004). 2-D CMOS based image sensor
system for fluorescent detection. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer
Engineering, IEEE (pp. 1441–1444).
10. Scheffer, D., Dierickx, B., and Meynants, G. (1997). Random addressable 2048 × 2048
active pixel image sensor. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 44(10), 1716–1720.
11. Lulé, T., Benthien, S., Keller, H., Mütze, F., Rieve, P., Seibel, K., and Böhm, M. (2000).
Sensitivity of CMOS based imagers and scaling perspectives. IEEE Transactions on
Electron Devices, 47(11), 2110–2122.
12. Agranov, G., Mauritzson, R., Barna, S., Jiang, J., Dokoutchaev, A., Fan, X., and Li,
X. (2007). Super small, sub 2µm pixels for novel CMOS image sensors. Proceedings
of the Extended Programme of the 2007 International Image Sensor Workshop (pp.
307–310).
13. Farrell, J. E., Xiao, F., Catrysse, P. B., and Wandell, B. A. (2004). A simulation tool
for evaluating digital camera image quality. International Society for Optics and
Photonics, Electronic Imaging (pp. 124–131).
14. Passeri, D., Placidi, P., Verducci, L., Pignatel, G. U., Ciampolini, P., Matrella, G.,
Marras, A., and Bilei, G. M. (2002). Active pixel sensor architectures in standard
CMOS technology for charged-particle detection technology analysis. Proceedings of
PIXEL 2002 International Workshop on Semiconductor Pixel Detectors for Particles
and X-rays.
15. Ho, D., Gulak, G., and Genov, R. (2011). CMOS field-modulated color sensor. 2011
IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC).
16. Scalzi, S., Bifaretti, S., and Verrelli, C. M. (2014). Repetitive learning control design
for LED light tracking. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 23(3),
1139–1146.
17. Marzuki, A., Pang, K. L., and Lim, K. (2012). Method and apparatus for integrating a
quantity of light. US Patent, 8232512.
18. Marzuki, A., Abdul Aziz, Z. A., and Abd Manaf, A. (2012). CMOS color sensor with
dark current cancellation. MASS 4th International Conference on Solid State Science
and Technology, Melaka.
19. Marzuki, A. (2016). CMOS image sensor: Analog and mixed-signal circuits.
In Developing and Applying Optoelectronics in Machine Vision, O. Sergiyenko and J.
C. Rodriguez-Quiñonez (Eds.). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
20. Feng, Z. (2014). Méthode de simulation rapide de capteur d’image CMOS prenant en
compte les paramètres d’extensibilité et de variabilité. Ecole Centrale de Lyon.
21. Trépanier, J., Sawan, M., Audet, Y., and Coulombe, J. (2002). A wide dynamic range
CMOS digital pixel sensor. The 2002 45th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and
Systems.
22. Yang, D. X. Y. (1999). Digital pixel CMOS image sensors. PhD thesis, Stanford
University.
CMOS Color and Image Sensor Circuit Design 215
23. Deguchi, J., Tachibana, F., Morimoto, M., Chiba, M., Miyaba, T., and Tanaka, H. K.
T. (2013). A 187.5 µVrms-read-noise 51 mW 1.4Mpixel CMOS image sensor with
PMOSCAP column CDS and 10b self-differential offset-cancelled pipeline SAR-ADC.
ISSCC (pp. 494–496).
24. Loinaz, M. J., Singh, K. J., Blanksby, A. J., Member, S., Inglis, D. A., Azadet, K., and
Ackland, B. D. (1998). A 200-mW, 3.3-V, CMOS color camera IC producing 352 × 288
24-b video at 30 frames/s. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 33(12), 2092–2103.
25. Massari, N., Gottardi, M., Gonzo, L., Stoppa, D., and Simoni, A. (2005). A CMOS
image sensor with programmable pixel-level analog processing. IEEE Transactions on
Neural Networks, 16(6), 1673–1684.
26. Bandyopadhyay, A., Lee, J., Robucci, R., and Hasler, P. (2006). MATIA: A program-
mable 80 μW/frame CMOS block matrix transformation imager architecture. IEEE
Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 41(3), 663–672. doi:10.1109/JSSC.2005.864115.
27. Zhang, M., and Bermak, A. (2010). Compressive acquisition CMOS image sensor:
From the algorithm to hardware implementation. IEEE Transactions on Very Large-
Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 18(3), 490–500.
28. Mahmoodi, A., and Joseph, D. (2008). Pixel-level delta-sigma ADC with optimized
area and power for vertically-integrated image sensors. Proceedings of the 51st Midwest
Symposium on Circuits and Systems MWSCAS’08 (pp. 41–44).
29. Tang, F., Cao, Y., and Bermak, A. (2010). An ultra-low power current-mode CMOS
image sensor with energy harvesting capability. Proceedings of ESSCIRC.
30. Cho, T., and Gray, P. R. (1995). A 10-bit, 20-MS/s, 35-mW pipeline A/D converter.
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 30(3), 166–172.
31. Cevik, I., Huang, X., Yu, H., Yan, M., and Ay, S. (2015). An ultra-low power CMOS
image sensor with on-chip energy harvesting and power management capability.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 15(3), 5531–5554.
32. Zhao, W., Wang, T., Pham, H., Hu-Guo, C., Dorokhov, A., and Hu, Y. (2014).
Development of CMOS pixel sensors with digital pixel dedicated to future particle
physics experiments. Journal of Instrumentation, 9(2), C02004–C02004.
33. Yao, Q. (2013). The design of a 16*16 pixels CMOS image sensor with 0.5 e-RMS
noise. Master Thesis. TU Delft.
34. Hamami, S., Fleshel, L., Yadid-pecht, O., and Driver, R. (2004). CMOS APS imager
employing 3.3 V 12 bit 6.3 MS/s pipelined ADC. Proceedings of the 2004 International
Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS’04 (pp. 960–963).
35. Wong, H.-S. (1996). Technology and device scaling considerations for CMOS imagers.
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 43(12), 2131–2142.
36. Marzuki, A. (2018). CMOS RGB colour sensor with a dark current compensation cir-
cuit. Informacije MIDEM, 48(2), 73–84.
9 Peripheral Circuits
9.1 INTRODUCTION
Knowledge of the oscillator and interface circuitry is important for a complete cus-
tom analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits. The oscillator can be used in more
advanced oscillatory, such as phase-locked loop. However, the phase-locked loop is
normally required for a very accurate source requirement. A basic built-in oscilla-
tor is normally sufficient for standalone analog or mixed-signal integrated circuits.
The control clock is basically generated from the controller or master controller inte-
grated circuit (IC).
9.2 OSCILLATOR
9.2.1 Ring Oscillator
Figure 9.1 shows a current-starved ring oscillator. The oscillation frequency of a
basic ring oscillator is:
1
fosc = (9.1)
n. ( t PHL + t PLH )
where n is the number of the inverters, and tPHL and tPLH are the intrinsic propagation
delays of an inverter.
Equation 9.1 is easily modified for the current-starved ring oscillator as:
ID
fosc = (9.2)
n. ( CTOTALVDD )
where VDD is the supply voltage, CTOTAL is the total capacitance of an inverter, and ID
is the total of current consumed by an inverter.
9.2.2 RC Oscillator
Figure 9.2 is a basic resistor-capacitor (RC) oscillator. Figure 9.3 shows the simplified
schematic of a waveform generator. It contains three selectable complementary metal-
oxide semiconductor (CMOS) capacitors. When the voltage at X is high, the switch
will turn ON and discharge all the capacitors. I is about 4 times of the current provided
by the oscillator reference (oscRef) block. The current generator and waveform genera-
tor are two major blocks in the RC oscillator. The current generator has a timer resistor-
capacitor start (RC Start). It is high when the current generator is stabled. Therefore,
the oscillator frequency should not warble at the earlier stage.
217
218 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VDD
M14 M7 M8 M9
M15
M1 M3 M4
out
M16
M2 M5 M6
GND
Vout
Vc
Vr C switch
R
The period time of one cycle of the circuit in Figure 9.2 is:
∆Vc
T = RC . (9.3)
Vr
VDD
I
x Amp/buffer
RC start
Switch
S0 S1 S2
vdda5
M9 M7 M0
vbiasp2
Qbar M1
out
vbiasp1 M10 Q
M5 M4
M2
C1
M8 M6
M3
vssa5
charge and discharge current ratios. Switches M4 and M5 reduce transient on-off
mirror glitches by preventing transistors M0 and M3 from turning off when they are
disconnected from the capacitor, C1. The comparator should toggle when the input
overdrive is at a minimum level, and that is when the ramp barely exceeds the upper
and lower voltage limits VH and VL.
The oscillator charge discharge circuit charges a capacitor with a constant charge
current IChg for the ramping up time of the period, until an upper voltage limit is reached,
and then discharges it with the discharge current IDchg for the remaining ramping down
time, until the lower limit is reached, and then starts a new cycle as in Figure 9.6.
The period of the ramp limits is set with two comparators, as in Equation 9.4.
1 1
T = C VH − ( VL − Verror ) + (9.4)
Ichg I Dchg
220 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Comparison
Charging Circuit
Circuit
IChg
SChg
CMP1
+
Ramp
VH SChg
– R Q
C
SDchg
IDchg VL
+ S Qn
SDchg
Prop. –
CMP2
FIGURE 9.5 Block diagram of ramp generator. (Redrawn from Pooya Forghani-Zadeh, H.,
and Rincon-Mora, G.A., J. Low Power Electron., 2, 1–5, 2006.)
VH
VEA
Ramp
VL Verror
tfall
Pulse
T = Period
D Q In1
clk
D Q In2
clk
D Q In3
Clkin
clk
In1
Phase 1
Phase 3
In3
clk
phi0
phi1
goes back low. The non-overlap time is set by the delay in series with the output of
the negated or (NOR) gates.
Figure 9.9 shows another example of a non-overlapping circuit. A special delay
is used in the circuit. The delay circuit is depicted in Figure 9.10. Metal-oxide semi-
conductor capacitors (MOSCAPs) are used instead of the conventional capacitor to
reduce the size of the circuit.
222 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
VDD
IN OUT
VSS
t1
SCK
t3
t2
SDI C3 C2
t5
INPUT
t4
CS
t6
TABLE 9.1
SPI Terminology
Symbol Parameter
t1 Clock cycle time
t2 Data setup time
t3 Data hold time
t4 SCK falling edge to CS rising edge
t5 CS falling edge to SCK rising edge
t6 CS pulse width
13
OE
12
CS
SDI 14
D Q D Q 15
QA
R
D Q D Q 1 QB
R
D Q D Q 2 QC
R
D Q D Q 3 QD
R Parallel Data Output
D Q D Q 4 QE
R
D Q D Q 5 QF
R
D Q D Q 6 QG
R
D Q 7 QH
D Q
SCK 11 R
10
SCLM 9 QG Serial Data Output
1 1 1
DIN 0 D Q 0 D Q 0 D Q REG_OUT
5 4 0
REG_EN
CLK_INT
1 1
D Q 0 D Q 0 D Q DOUT
7 6 0
SHIFT_EN
CLK_ADC
for an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) uses an internal clock for easier synchro-
nization. Nevertheless, the timing of internal signals and external signals is very
important. Special care must be taken during the interface circuit.
9.4.2 I2C
Both serial data and serial clock are bidirectional lines, connected to a positive sup-
ply voltage via a pull-up resistor (see Figure 9.15). When the bus is free, both lines
are HIGH. The output stages of devices connected to the bus must have an open-
drain or open-collector in order to perform the wired-AND function. Data on the
I2C-bus can be transferred at a rate up to 100 kbit/s in the standard-mode, or up to
+VDD
PULL-UP
Rp Rp
RESISTORS
SDA (SERIAL DATA LINE)
SCL (SERIEL CLOCK LINE)
SCLK SCLK
DEVICE 1 DEVICE 2
400 kbit/s in the fast-mode. The number of interfaces connected to the bus is solely
dependent on the bus capacitance limit of 400 pF.
The I2C-bus supports any IC fabrication process (NMOS, CMOS, bipolar). Two
wires, serial data and serial clock, carry information between the devices connected
to the bus. Each device is recognized by a unique address and can operate as either
a transmitter or receiver, depending on the function of the device. In addition to
transmitters and receivers, devices can also be considered as masters or slaves when
performing data transfers. A master is a device that initiates a data transfer on the
bus and generates the clock signals to permit that transfer. At that time, any device
addressed is considered a slave.
from core
VDD
logic ND1
M1
OE
output
enable
I2 I/O
pad
M2
DATAout
NR1
DATAin
to core
logic I1
VIH
switching threshold may
be anywhere in this band
Vin
VIL
+3V
R1 R2 3
20k 10k 2.8 Output
M1 M2 2.6
Input
Output 2.4
2.2
W=3u W=3u 2
L=0.35u L=0.35u Input
1.8
R3 1.6
5k 1.4
1.2
1
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time/μSecs 2μSecs/div
Vdd
P1
P3
P2
IN OUT
N2 Vdd
N3
N1
m2
CK NEG_BOOST
m1
CK C1 POS_BOOST
m2
Q1
m3
m2
m1
POS_BOOST
m2 m3 m4 m5
C1 C2 C3 C4 m6
CK
CK
circuits is of course less than V DD x 2, since the devices will suffer a forward volt-
age drop when acting as diodes.
For greater output potentials, two approaches can be taken, both basically differ-
ential in nature. The first is based on the above concept, but expanded to any number
of stages, and is shown in Figure 9.21.
The voltages obtained can be damaging to the thin gate oxide of the devices, and
it is expected that this will be taken into consideration.
Such differential techniques can be used to create outputs much closer to VDD x 2
with a single stage, as shown in Figure 9.22.
Such stages can be cascaded to achieve higher voltages.
These boost circuits can be used at very high frequencies to minimize the require-
ment for large capacitor values. Fifty megahertz is not unreasonable, but the clock
signals should be strong and symmetrical. The currents from such boosted supplies
are usually not intended for high power applications; and these circuits are usually
Peripheral Circuits 229
POS_BOOST
m3 m4
m1 m2
C1 C2
CK
CKN
only used in cases where high voltage is passed at a very low current, as in the pro-
gramming or erase of memory through a tunneling mechanism, where the required
currents are trivial.
When designing boost circuits, be careful to notice conditions that simulation
program with integrated circuit emphasis (SPICE) may not handle well, as in the
overshoot of signals above a well potential may cause current spikes into the body
or substrate.
POWER DOWN
POR OUT
RESET
VDD RC DELAY
VSS POR POR_RC
POR output
3.0
2.0
(V)
1.0
0.0
-1.0
2.0 VTHRES
1.0
3.0
2.0
(V)
t por
1.0
0.0
-1.0
1.0
0.0
-1.0
40u 50u 60u 70u
time (s)
d o POR_DIFF
output
vdd VSSA
Differential
Amplifier
VSSA
VSSA
VSSA
Voltage POR
PWRON
Reference
vdd vdd
vdd
vdd
RC
rc
rc
Reset
rc
VSSD PORC
POR_RC output
I
ID
p
(NA)
+
Ron
VD −
n
(ND)
Von V
(a) (b)
FIGURE 9.27 Simple forward bias p–n junction diode: (a) schematic and (b) I–V curve.
Peripheral Circuits 233
than the gate-oxide breakdown voltage. In fact, a Zener diode is normally used
as a secondary ESD protection device [4].
Snapback devices have a mechanism in which the device will drive into the break-
down region when the voltage across the device is increased. After the breakdown, the
voltage across the device is dropped and moved to a holding region from the breakdown
region because of the internal positive feedback mechanism. The most important snap-
back devices in CMOS technology are MOSFETs and silicon-controlled rectifiers.
The grounded-gate configuration is one of the simplest forms of MOSFETs in the
ESD protection circuit where the source and gate are grounded. Figure 9.28a illus-
trates the basic structure of a grounded-gate NMOS (GGNMOS), and Figure 9.28b
shows the I–V characteristic for the GGNMOS [4].
Based on the GGNMOS I–V characteristic, the key device parameters are Vt1, Vh,
Vt2, and It2. There are a few requirements that must be met to establish a robust ESD
protection circuit against a ESD event. To protect the gate-oxide, first the triggering
voltage of Vt1 must be smaller than the breakdown voltage of the gate-oxide during
an ESD stress condition. This will result in a turn-on for a GGNMOS device prior to
the gate-oxide breakdown occurring. Secondly, Vt2 must be greater than Vt1 to ensure
a uniform turn-on mechanism happens on this GGNMOS device. This is a very
important element to ensure that each finger turns on spontaneously with respect
to the voltage build-up before the first finger that turned on first reaches the second
breakdown. Thirdly, It2 should be as high as possible, as it determines the ESD pro-
tection device robustness. Finally, the holding voltage (Vh) must be larger than VDD,
or else, the GGNMOS will easily turn on under normal operating conditions.
Gate-length dependence on the failure current has been reported by several
authors. For example, [5] reported the dependence on gate length through three-
dimensional (3-D) conduction non-uniformity. Work in [6] focused on the experi-
mental results of a MOSFET by means of an energy band diagram and current flow
path analysis. Work in [7] focused on the performance of different concentration
structures through hard failure and soft failure. Based on the traditional parasitic
negative-positive-negative (npn) triggering model under ESD conditions, it is gen-
erally accepted that a MOSFET with a shorter channel length has a higher current
gain, which helps give a better ESD performance. However, contrary to the above
Drain IDrain
(Vt2,It2)
n+ n+
Igen
p-sub
Isub (Vh,Ih)
(Vt1,It1)
FIGURE 9.28 GGNMOS: (a) basic structure and (b) I–V curve.
234 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
cases, some experimental results indicated a better ESD performance with a long
channel length. Reference [4] proposed that the better ESD capability for a longer-
gate NMOS was the trade-off between melt volume and power dissipation, not just
the above result of parasitic npn triggering.
Gate length in protection circuits has a big influence on the ESD capability.
This includes the trigger voltage (Vt1), on-state resistance (Ron), failure current (It2),
and leakage current (Ileakage). The gate length refers to the base width of the lateral
parasitic npn. The triggering mechanism is defined by the turn-on of the parasitic
npn by impact ionization:
β ( M − 1) ≥ 1, (9.5)
Vcc
Vcc D1
D2
D1
D3
Vcc Q1
D4
R1
D1 D5
Vss
Vss Vss
C1
C1 R1
G1 Q1
Q2
Q1 C1 Q1
R1 R1
R2
Vcc
D1 D3
D2 D4
Vss
VDD
ESD
In
ESD
ESD
GND
ESD Schematic
DVDD
AVDD
SHUNT
AVSS
DVSS
PAD_XCLKar0 PAD_TDbt0 PAD_VSSAbt0 PAD_VDDAbt0 PAD_VDDbt1 PAD_RCVRbt1 PAD_GNDbt0 PAD_CORNERbt0 PAD_ANbt1
(DIO) (DO) (DO) (AP) (DP) (DI) (AG) (AIO)
TABLE 9.2
Pad Ring
Pin Name Type Pad Type Description
1 AVDD AP VDDA Power
2 AGND AP GNDA Ground
3 TEST DI PAD_RCVR Not used. Tie to logic low
4 SLEEP DI PAD_RCVR Active-high synchronous sleep enable. Device goes
into power-saving sleep mode
5 SDAPROM DIO PAD_XCLK I2C EEPROM data in out. Tie to external EEPROM’s
SDA pin
6 SCLPROM DO PAD_TD I2C EEPROM clock output. Tie to external EEPROM’s
SCL pin
7 SDASLV DIO PAD_XCLK I2C slave data in out. Tie to master SDA
8 SCLSLV DI PAD_RCVR I2C slave clock input. Tie to master SCL
9 XRST DI PAD_RCVR Active-low asynchronous reset
10 CLKIO DIO PAD_XCLK CLKIO outputs the internal clock signal if CLKSEL=0.
It inputs an external clock signal if CLKSEL=1
11 CLKSEL DI PAD_RCVR Internal clock mode if CLKSEL=0. External clock
mode if CLKSEL=1
12 DVDD DP VDD Power
13 DGND DP VSS Ground
14 PWM DO PAD_TD Digital output signal
17 ANA0 ANA PAD_An General-purpose analog pin
18 ANA1 ANA PAD_An General-purpose analog pin
Abbreviations: DI, digital input; DO, digital output; DIO, digital input/output (input if control signal is
high); ANA, analog I/O; DP, digital power; AP, analog power.
I/O pads and power pads. The oscillator, POR, and THI (time-high) block are added
into the pad ring as well. An example of the pad ring is shown in Table 9.2.
ESD devices cannot be copied directly from one technology to another technol-
ogy because of the change of the device characteristics. However, the general topol-
ogy can still be applied. A major concern for the radio frequency (RF) application is
the big parasitic capacitance associated with the ESD devices or structure; one has
to carefully trade-off between RF and ESD performance.
1.0x100
Vosc (V)
5.0x10-1
0.0
6 V(net@10)
4
2
0
V(net@12)
6
4
2
0
V (V)
6 V(net@13)
4
2
0
V(net@14)
6
4
2
0
1.0
V (V)
0.5
0.0
0 1x10-7 2x10-7
Time (s)
1.5
V(out)
1.0
V (V)
V(a)
0.5
0.0
0.0 5.0x10-7 1.0x10-6
Time (s)
D_InB D_In
En D_Out
dgnd
dvdd
50 oe 50
100 100
12 12 prep 400
pad
oeb oe oeb 50 25
6 6 pren 200
50 50
25 25
dvdd_1
dgnd_1
FIGURE 9.42 Bidirectional pad (0.5 micron) grid scale is 0.3 micron.
CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Peripheral Circuits 243
V(d_inb)
6
-2
V(d_in)
6
4
V (V)
-2
V(in_pad)
6
-2
0 1x10-7 2x10-7
Time (s)
6
V(out_pad)
0
V (V)
6 V(d_out)
0 1x10-7 2x10-7
Time (s)
9.12 SUMMARY
This chapter discussed the practices of practical analog and mixed-signal integrated
circuits. The interface circuitries are really very applicable to the real implemen-
tation. The ESD circuit is also practical, nevertheless, it can be extended to the
research domain.
REFERENCES
1. Pooya Forghani-Zadeh, H., and Rincon-Mora, G. A. (2006). Low-power CMOS ramp
generator circuit for DC–DC converters. Journal Low Power Electronics, 2, 1–5.
2. Barr, K. (2007). ASIC Design in the Silicon Sandbox: A Complete Guide to Building
Mixed-Signal Integrated Circuits. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
3. Camenzind, H. (2005). Designing Analog Chips. Charleston, SC: BookSurge
Publishing.
4. Amerasekera, A., and Duvvury, D. (2002). ESD Protection Circuit Design Concepts
and Strategy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 105–125.
5. Chen, T.-Y., and Ker, M.-D. (2001). Investigation of the gate-driven effect and substrate-
triggered effect on ESD robustness of CMOS devices. IEEE Transactions on Device
and Materials Reliability, 1(4), 190–203.
6. Bock, K., Russ, C., Badenes, G., Groeseneken, G., and Deferm, L. (1998). Influence of
well profile and gate length on the ESD performance of a fully silicided 0.25 μm CMOS
technology. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing
Technology: Part C, 21(4), 286–294.
7. Wu, D.-X., Jiang, L.-L., Fan, H., Fang, J., and Zhang, B. (2013). Analysis on the positive
dependence of channel length on ESD failure current of a GGNMOS in a 5 V CMOS.
Journal of Semiconductors, 34(2), 1–5.
10 Layout and Packaging
10.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses the layout technique and packaging information. For a spe-
cific circuit, a layout specifies the position and dimension of the different layers of
materials as they would be laid on the silicon wafer. However, the layout description
is only a symbolic representation, which simplifies the description of the actual fab-
rication process. For example, the layout representation does not explicitly indicate
the thickness of the layers, thickness of oxide coating, amount of ionization in the
transistor’s channels, etc., but these factors are implicitly understood in the fabrica-
tion process. Some of the main layers used in any layout description are n-diffusion,
p-diffusion, poly, metal-1, and metal-2. Each of these layers is represented by a poly-
gon of a particular color or pattern.
10.2 PROCESS
Following the rule of complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process
or CMOS technology is essential in designing a working CMOS integrated circuit.
10.2.1 Antenna Rule
Process-induced damage to the thin gate oxide occurs when conductors charge up
during wafer fabrication. Conductor layers that are exposed to a plasma environment
during processing will charge up and cause a current to be passed through any gate-
oxide areas that are electrically connected to the exposed conductor layers through
lower conductor layers. Since the conductor charge collector area must be greater
than the connected gate oxide area, the conductor can effectively act as an antenna
and amplify the induced gate oxide current. This current can damage the gate oxide,
and that may result in degraded circuit yield and reliability. The damage depends
on the total charge passed through the gate oxide that is proportional to the ratio of
the exposed conductor area divided by the electrically connected gate oxide area.
This quantity is called the charge collector ratio.
Although the fabrication process will be engineered to minimize process-induced
damage, designers need to reduce the sensitivity of their layouts to this damage.
The antenna rule is shown in Figure 10.1.
247
248 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
NMOAT
Poly Metal-1
M1
M2
NMOAT
(a) Vulnerable gate oxide
M1
M2
FIGURE 10.1 Antenna rule: (a) Vulnerable gate oxide and (b) protected gate oxide.
the electrons leads to a slow migration of those atoms in the direction of electron flow,
causing the line to migrate in the direction of the electrons (opposite to the current flow).
In regions of the metal line where discontinuities occur (e.g., at the naturally occurring
grain boundaries), a void can develop, creating an opening in the line. Fortunately, there
is a current density threshold level (about 1 mA/mm) below which electromigration is
insignificant. Notably, copper, in addition to having a lower resistivity than aluminum,
has a greater resistance to electromigration. Worst case electromigration is encountered
at the highest operating temperatures and current densities (that is, maximum current
electrical models). The maximum current allowed in any metal line is given by:
I = I ’× WD (10.1)
where WD is the drawn width and Iʹ (in mA/µm) is the maximum current per micron
of drawn width. Table 10.1 shows an example of the metals current density.
TABLE 10.1
Metal Current Density
Maximum Line Current Density per Drawn Width 0.35 µm
Process
Maximum Current
Density (mA/µm)
85_C 110_C
Metal 1, 2 Unidirectional 2.52 1.20
Bidirectional 3.78 1.81
Metal 3 Unidirectional 3.29 1.58
Bidirectional 4.94 2.36
Layout and Packaging 249
The metal density is a metal coverage area in a layout. The percentage is normally
used to identify the density of any given metal. The minimum density is typically
higher than 60%.
4 5 6 7 8 7 65 4
Poor
Match
{111}
Plane
Good
Match 9
10 11 12
Isostress lines
<211>
Direction
Wafer flat
along the
(110) axis
{111}
Plane
Sensitive analog
Output drivers
Bonding Interconnect
inductance On-chip decoupling capacitor resistance
Pin Pad Pad Pin
Analog circuitry
VDD
Off-chip decoupling capacitor
+ –
Digital circuitry
Pin Pad Pad Pin
On-chip decoupling capacitor for the decoupling circuitry
FIGURE 10.5 Showing how decoupling capacitors are used in a mixed-signal chip.
Layout and Packaging 251
Vdd
Gnd
PMOS
channel
Wiring
A B C
P-type
substrate
Transistor
channel
}
Out Y Vdd A B C Y
NMOS
B Transistor
channel
N-type C
substrate Gnd
FIGURE 10.6 Layout planning: (a) Representation without regard to layout and (b) layout
friendly.
Interconnect
considerations Interconnect level
Shielding
Guard rings
Device level
Fully differential design/Matching
Power supply and grounding issues
Floor planning
System level
Insulator
Insulator
Insulator
FOX
p-substrate
Pad metal 1
N-well
N-select
P-select
P-select N-select
Vial 1
* ESD in PADS
* Driver/Logic in
Pads
* Seal Ring
FIGURE 10.11 Orientation: (a) Best match, (b) moderate match, and (c) worst match.
254 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
ISOTHERMAL LINES
HEAT SOURCE
POOR GOOD
MATCH MATCH
1 2 3 4 5
6
R1 R2
7
Increasing
8
sheet
resistance
9
10
R3 R4
11
RB
RA
A B A B
10.5.2 Guard Ring
The purpose of a guard ring is to collect carriers. It is obviously needed for PN
junction-based devices. It can reduce the latch-up condition and noise or inter-
ference in the guard ringed device. The guard ring is also used for the n-well
resistor. This is shown in Figure 10.15. A NMOS-based circuit or PMOS-based
circuit can also be guard ringed, see Figure 10.16.
Layout and Packaging 255
N+ P-select
N-well Connected to
ground
P+
N-well
NMOS PMOS
P+ Diffusion
Circuits Circuits
N+ Diffusion
Contact
vss
10.5.3 Shielding
Shielding is an effort to shield the analog path or signal from a noisy signal. This is
shown in Figure 10.17. In this example, metal 1 is used to “shield” the analog signal
(poly1) from a noisy digital signal (metal 2). The metal 1 is connected to the ground.
Analog signal
Metal 1 Insulator
Poly 1 Insulator
(a) (b)
FIGURE 10.18 Metal connection: (a) bad for matching devices and (b) good for matching
devices.
polluting currents. Similarly, on the IC, use separate metal runs to connect sensitive
devices. In Figure 10.18, the left-hand connection (Figure 10.18a) can create an error.
Figure 10.18b is for matching device connection.
Assume the runs lead to emitters/sources carrying 1 mA. With, say, 50 squares
of additional aluminum for the upper device, if the resistance is:
L
R = Sheet Resistance × (10.2)
W
where Sheet Resistance is 30 mΩ/sq, L and W are metal length and width, respec-
tively. So, using Equation 10.2, creating a current mismatch of 6% at room tempera-
ture. With the balanced connection on the right, this is avoided.
Layout and Packaging 257
METAL
OXIDE
P TYPE RESISTOR
N TYPE EPI TUB
Iout
V = L× M (10.3)
tout
where L is an inductance associated with the Vdd pin. A similar effect occurs on the
ground connection for outputs switching to 0. With a total output current of 200 mA/
ns and a ground pin inductance of 5 nH, using Equation 8.3, the voltage transient is
about 1 V. The voltage transient propagates through the IC, potentially causing logic
blocks to fail to produce the correct outputs. The transient voltage can be reduced by
reducing the power line inductance L, for example, by replacing the single Vdd and
Gnd pins by multiple Vdd and Gnd pins, with K voltage pins reducing the inductance
by a factor of K. See Figure 10.20 [3].
258 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Vdd
Gnd
Channel
Wiring
Additional Level of
Distribution Vdd
PMOS Transistors (Pull-up)
Vdd
Gnd
(a) (b)
FIGURE 10.20 Power and ground distribution (interdigitated lines) with rows and logic
cells and rows of wiring channels: (a) overall power distribution and organization of logic
cells and wiring channels and (b) local region of power distribution network. (Redrawn from
Brewer, J.E. et al., Integrated Circuits: The Electrical Engineering Handbook, R. C. Dorf
(Ed.), CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.)
FIGURE 10.21 Clock distribution. (a) Example of single driver and isochronous regions.
(b) Example of distributed drivers. (c) Example of clock distribution with unequal line lengths
but within skew tolerances.
Layout and Packaging 259
whose clock paths have equal lengths to terminal points, ideally delivering clock
pulses to each of the terminal points (leaf nodes) of the tree simultaneously (zero
skew).
In a real circuit, precisely zero clock skew is not achieved since different network
segments encounter different environments of data lines coupled electrically to the
clock line segment.
In Figure 10.21a, a single buffer drives the entire H-tree network, requiring a
large area buffer and wide clock lines toward the connection of the clock line to the
external clock signal. Such a large buffer can account for up to 30% or more of the
total VLSI circuit power dissipation. Figure 10.21b illustrates a distributed buffer
approach, with a given buffer only having to drive those clock line segments to the
next level of buffers. In this case, the buffers can be smaller and the clock lines can
be narrower.
Figure 10.21c, the clock network uses multiple buffers, but allows different path
lengths consistent with clock skew margins. For tight margins, an H-tree can be used
to deliver clock pulses to local regions in which distribution proceeds using a differ-
ent buffered network approach such as that in Figure 10.21c.
10.6.3 Latch-up
Parasitic transistors turn on, producing a low resistance path between power
rails. Large currents flow causing thermal destruction. Processing, layout, and
circuit design techniques, can be properly applied to make latch-up unlikely.
The structure of CMOS creates parasitic transistors that can cause latch-up.
The concept of parasitic devices is shown in Figure 10.22. Figure 10.23 shows
a layout method to avoid latch-up. Well tap is used to connect to either ground
or VDD.
In
NMOS ,M1 PMOS ,M2
Well connection
Substrate connection
VDD
Out
p+ n+ n+ C1 p+ p+ n+
Q2
RW 2 Q1 RW 1
n- well
C2
RS2 RS1
p- substrate
VDD
VDD
Ground
Ground
FIGURE 10.23 Adding an extra implant between NMOS and PMOS to reduce latch-up.
10.7 PACKAGING
Packaging of electronic circuits is the science and the art of establishing intercon-
nections and a suitable operating environment for predominantly electrical cir-
cuits. It supplies the chips with wires to distribute signals and power, removes
the heat generated by the circuits, and provides them with physical support and
environmental protection. It plays an important role in determining the perfor-
mance, cost, and reliability of the system. With the decrease in feature size and the
increase in the scale of integration, the delay in on-chip circuitry is now smaller
than that introduced by the package. Thus, the ideal package would be one that
is compact, and should supply the chips with a required number of signal and
power connections, which have minute capacitance, inductance, and resistance.
The package should remove the heat generated by the circuits. Its thermal proper-
ties should match well with a semiconductor chip to avoid stress-induced cracks
and failures. The package should be reliable, and it should cost much less than the
chips it carries.
WIRE
CHIP ON-CHIP PAD
ADHESIVE
SUBSTRATE
SUBSTRATE ............. PAD
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
BONDING PAD
CHIP
SOLDER BUMP
SUBSTRATE or CHIP
The connections have relatively poor electrical performance. The solder bump is
another approach. This is shown in Figure 10.25. Solder bumps are small spheres
of solder (solder balls) that are bonded to contact areas or pads of semiconductor
devices and subsequently used for face-down bonding. The length of the electrical
connections between the chip and the substrate can be minimized by placing sol-
der bumps on the die, flipping the die over, aligning the solder bumps with the con-
tact pads on the substrate, and re-flowing the solder balls in a furnace to establish
the bonding between the die and the substrate. This technology provides electrical
connections with minute parasitic inductances and capacitances. In addition, the
contact pads are distributed over the entire chip surface rather than being confined
to the periphery. As a result, the silicon area is used more efficiently, the maximum
number of interconnects is increased, and signal interconnections are shortened.
But this technique results in poor thermal conduction, difficult inspection of the
solder bumps, and possible thermal expansion mismatch between the semiconduc-
tor chips and the substrate.
10.7.2 Package Type
The package with leads is shown in Figure 10.26. Figure 10.27 is a leadless package.
Figure 10.28 is chip scale package (CSP). CSPs can be divided into two categories:
the fan-in type and the fan-out type.
Fan-in type CSPs are suitable for memory applications that have relatively low
pin counts. This type is further divided into two types, depending on the location
of bonding pads on the chip surface; these are the center pad type and the periph-
eral pad type. This type of CSP keeps all the solder bumps within the chip area by
arranging bumps in an area array format on the chip surface.
262 CMOS Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Packaged chip
Chip lead
PCB
Solder
Molding compound
Die Gold wire
Lead Lead
Exposed die pad
Down bond Silver epoxy
CHIP
SOLDER BUMP
Solder balls
The fan-out CSPs are used mainly for logic applications: because of the die size to
pin count ratio, the solder bumps cannot be designed within the chip area.
Figure 10.29 shows the image/color sensor package. A clear compound is dis-
posed over the IC active area. A transparent glass cover is disposed over the clear
compound on the IC active area. Light may pass through the cover and the clear
compound onto the IC active area.
Layout and Packaging 263
Lens/Filter/
Clear
compound
Die
Lead Lead
Exposed die pad
Down bond Silver epoxy
10.7.3 Package Parasitic
See Figure 10.30. Typically, the electrical interconnection of a chip in a package
consists of chip-to-substrate interconnect, metal runs on the substrate, and, finally,
pins from the package. Associated with these are the electrical resistance, induc-
tance and capacitance—referred to as package parasitics. The electrical parasitics
are determined by the physical parameters, such as interconnect width, thickness,
length, spacing, and resistivity; by the thickness of the dielectric; and by the dielec-
tric constant.
Resistance refers to both direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC).
The DC resistance of an interconnect is a property of its cross-sectional area, length,
and material resistivity.
In addition, the AC resistance depends on the frequency of the signal and is higher
than the DC resistance because of the skin effect.
Resistance in the power distribution path results in the attenuation of input signals
to the device and output signals from the device. This has the effect of increasing
the path delay.
The capacitance of an interconnect is a property of its area, the thickness of the
dielectric separating it from the reference potential, and the dielectric constant of the
Package
Package
Chip capacitor
Chip Board
GND GND
10.8 SUMMARY
In this chapter, the fundamental of layout and packaging is introduced. Careful plan-
ning of layout and packaging can lead to a very successful design or product. Even
though no modern tool is introduced in this chapter, the knowledge provided is ben-
eficial for the layout designer. The package information is essential for the circuit
designer.
REFERENCES
1. Baker, R. J. (2010). CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation (3rd ed.). Wiley-
IEEE Press. doi:10.1002/9780470891179.
2. Daly, J. C., and Galipeau, D. P. (1999). Analog BiCMOS Design: Practices & Pitfalls.
Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
3. Brewer, J. E., Zargham, M. R., Tragoudas, S., and Tewksbury, S. (2000). Integrated
Circuits: The Electrical Engineering Handbook, R. C. Dorf (Ed.). Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press LLC.
Index
A oxide, 30–31, 36–38
storage, 5
accumulation, 10–11 carrier drift velocity models, 32–33
active integrator, 138–139, 141 cascode biasing, 66
active load, 61, 65–66, 107, 109, 111 cascode current source, 66, 124–125, 129
ADC example, 186 CCD, see charge-coupled device
aluminum, 247–248, 256, 260 channel
analog CMOS, 3 long, 9, 18, 41–42
analog ground, 193, 255–256 short, 34
analog signal, 255–256 channel length modulation, 24, 26–27, 54, 117
analog-to-digital converter, 167, 176 charge, 5, 7, 12–13, 16–19, 21, 24–25, 29–30, 36–37,
antenna rule, 247–248 39, 105, 109, 135–141, 143–144, 146–
148, 195, 205, 218–219, 221, 234, 247
B injection, 135, 144
charge-coupled device, 195
backside illumination, 176, 195–196 chip design, 251
band chip scale package, 261, 264
conduction, 5–6, 10 chopper amplifier, 135, 152–154, 164
valence, 5–6, 10 circuit design, 1, 4, 259, 264
bandgap voltage reference, 121 clamp, 127, 234–235; see also shunt
bandwidth, 86–88, 91, 98–99, 150, 152, 157 classic boost circuit, 228
base-emitter voltage, 119, 122 CLM, see channel length modulation
basic switched capacitor, 136 clock, 136–144, 149, 152, 154–156
beta multiplier reference, 129 skew, 258–259
bidirectional, 224–225, 237, 242, 244–245 CMOS color sensor, 195, 198, 213
binary-weighted resistor, 169–170, 172 CMOS image sensor architecture, 202
bipolar, 225, 227 CMOS process, 249, 257
process, 249 CMRR, see common mode rejection ratio
transistor, 31, 105, 122, 153 color filter array, 8
BMR, see beta multiplier reference color selection, 201
body effect, 18, 54, 56–58 column-level ADC, 202–203
bonding, 250, 255, 260–261 common mode feedback, 79–80, 145, 149
bond wire, 263 common mode rejection ratio, 73
boost circuits, 227–229 common mode voltage, 147, 201
bottom plate sampling, 145 comparator, 4, 156, 177–180, 183, 190, 204, 208,
breakdown, 119, 121 218–219
voltage, 233 compensation, 61, 65, 73, 81–82
BSI, see backside illumination complementary to absolute temperature, 119
buffer, 219, 221, 225, 244–245 conductance, 135, 150
built-in potential, 16 constant-transconductance, 127
bulk-driven, 103 constant-voltage scaling, 28, 30–31
continuous integrator, 138–139
C controller, 217, 222
control signal, 199–201
calibration, 173–175 control voltage, 158
capacitance conversion factor, 205
depletion layer, 5 copper, 248
junction, 35, 37–40 correlated doubled sampling, 203
overlap, 36–37 coupling capacitor, 104
265
266 Index
MOS operation, 13 P
MOS structure, 9, 11–13, 15
MOS transistor, 18, 24, 31, 33, 105–106, 114, 135, package parasitic, 263
152, 257 pad
most significant bit, 167, 182 analog, 225
MSB, see most significant bit bidirectional, 225, 237, 242, 244–245
multiple Vdd, 257 I/O, 225, 234, 237, 251
multiplication, 65, 179, 207, 234 low parasitic capacitance, 251
multistage, 228 output, 225
parallel, 222–223
parallel to serial interface, 222
N parasitic bipolar transistors, 259
parasitic capacitances, 136, 139, 142–143, 197, 237
NF, see noise figure parasitic npn, 234
NMOS, 19, 27, 31, 35, 44–46, 50, parasitic transistors, 259
52–55, 58 passive loads, 109
noise figure, 110 pass transistor, 125–126
noise(s), 61, 73, 75, 77–78, 90–99, 101 phase margin, 82
in amplifiers, 90 phase shift, 64, 82
in amplifier with resistors in feedback, 97 photocurrent, 195, 201, 206–207
bandwidth, 98–99 photo devices, 5, 8, 197
in circuits, 90 phototransistor, 8, 197
in differential pairs, 96 pinch-off, 19, 20, 24–25
flicker, 42–43 pinned photodiode, 8–9
in single-stage amplifiers, 92 pipelined ADC, 179, 181–182
thermal, 41 pixel-level ADC, 202–203
non-inverting active integrator, 144–145 pixel sensor
non-linear, 27, 135, 144 analog, 205
non-linearity, 137 digital, 202, 208
non-overlapping generator, 220 pixel size, 196–197
novelty, 1–2 plasma environment, 247
PMOS, 45–46, 48–55, 57, 103, 107–109, 111, 129,
135–136, 150, 153, 158, 169, 209, 227,
O
251, 254–255, 258–260
off current, 54 transistor, 45–46, 61, 108–109, 111, 136, 150,
on-chip, 18, 208, 260–261 153, 169
design, 156 PN junction, 5–7
on current, 58 diode, 251
1.5-bit stage, 181, 183, 186 POR, see power on reset
on-state resistance, 234 positive feedback, 233
on-voltage, 232 power consumption, 103–104, 111, 114, 168–169,
operational transconductance amplifier, 208 186, 195, 204, 208–209, 213
oscillator(s), 117, 156 power on reset, 229–230
ramp, 218 power supply rejection ratio, 73
RC, 217–219 precharge, 199, 201–202
ring, 217, 237–239, 244 predictive technology model, 49–51, 53
out-of-phase, 109, 114 process, voltage, and temperature, 117
output impedance, 129 process fitting ratio, 43
output resistance, 65–66, 68–69, 73, 93, 117, process variation, 118
124, 150 programmable gain amplifier, 146
overall signal path, 64 propagation delays, 3, 217
overdrive, 53, 136 proportional to absolute temperature, 119
overlapping clock generator, 221 PSI, see parallel to serial interface
oversampling, 209 PSRR, see power supply rejection ratio
overshoot, 127 PTAT, see proportional to absolute temperature
oxide thickness, 9, 29, 47 PTM, see predictive technology model
Index 269
U W
unity-gain bandwidth, 150 wafer, 247, 249, 252
weak inversion, 31–32, 104, 114, 123, 208
wideband amplifier technique, 84
V wideband differential LNA, 110–111
work function, 10, 15–16
variable resistor, 126
VBE, see base-emitter voltage
VDD variation, 128 Y
VDSAT, 21, 24, 33 yield, 247
voltage-controlled oscillator, 119
voltage gain, 107 Z
voltage-mode, 168, 174
voltage regulator, 125–126 Zener diode, 121, 126–127