52730
52730
https://ebookfinal.com/download/new-religious-movements-in-the-
twenty-first-century-legal-political-and-social-challenges-in-
global-perspective-1st-edition-phillip-lucas/
New Religious Movements in the Twenty First Century Legal
Political and Social Challenges in Global Perspective 1st
Edition Phillip Lucas Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-social-question-in-the-twenty-
first-century-a-global-view-jan-breman/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/intergovernmental-relations-state-and-
local-challenges-in-the-twenty-first-century-1st-edition-jonathan-m-
fisk/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/antarctic-security-in-the-twenty-
first-century-legal-and-policy-perspectives-1st-edition-alan-d-
hemmings/
The birth of capitalism a twenty first century perspective
Heller
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-birth-of-capitalism-a-twenty-
first-century-perspective-heller/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-new-religious-movements-
experience-in-america-the-american-religious-experience-eugene-v-
gallagher/
https://ebookfinal.com/download/social-movements-for-global-democracy-
themes-in-global-social-change-1st-edition-jackie-smith/
New Religious Movements in the Twenty First Century
Legal Political and Social Challenges in Global
Perspective 1st Edition Phillip Lucas Digital Instant
Download
Author(s): Phillip Lucas
ISBN(s): 9780415965774, 0415965772
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 2.70 MB
Year: 2004
Language: english
New Religious Movements in the
Twenty-First Century
New Religious Movements in the
Twenty-First Century
Legal Political and Social Challenges in Global Perspective
Edited by
ROUTLEDGE
NEW YORK AND LONDON
Published in 2004 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street New York, NY 10001
http://www.routledge-ny.com/
Published in Great Britain by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane London EC4P 4EE
http://www.routledge.co.uk/
Acknowledgments x
10 Prophets, “False Prophets,” and the African State Emergent Issues of 121
Religious Freedom and Conflict
ROSALIND I.J.HACKETT
11 Religion on a Leash NRMs and the Limits of Chinese Freedom 146
SCOTT LOWE
12 Consensus Shattered Japanese Paradigm Shift and Moral Panic in the Post- 156
Aum Era
IAN READER
13 New Religions in Australia Public Menace or Societal Salvation? 165
JAMES T.RICHARDSON
Index 296
Acknowledgments
This book is a collaborative effort and has benefited from the sage advice, research, and
criticisms of a host of scholars. These include, among others, Eileen Barker, Massimo
Introvigne, Jean-François Mayer, J.Gordon Melton, James T.Richardson, John R.Hall,
James A.Beckford, Armin Geertz, Mikael Rothstein, Danièle Hervieu-Léger, Susan
J.Palmer, Brigitte Schoen, Marat Shterin, Solveiga Krumina-Konkova, Brian Glyn
Williams, Rosalind I.J. Hackett, Scott Lowe, Ian Reader, Robert T.Carpenter, Irving
Hexham and Karla Poewe, Mark Sedgwick, Benjamin Zablocki, J.Anna Looney, Dick
Anthony, Catherine Wessinger and Rebecca Moore (Co-General Editors of Nova
Religio), Hubert Seiwert, Paul Froese, Gary D.Bouma, Willy Fautré, Lorne Dawson,
Jeffrey Kaplan, Mimi Goldman, Michael Barkun, Rodney Stark, Jayne Docherty, and Jeff
Kenney. We also wish to acknowledge the vital clerical and computer assistance of
Kristen Asleson, Lisa Guenther, and June Sitler, and the editorial staff at Routledge,
especially Gilad Foss, Bill Germano, Alan Kaplan, and Damian Treffs. Finally, we wish
to acknowledge the many non-profit organizations, NGOs, and private individuals who
work to expose and redress instances of religious intolerance, persecution, and bigotry in
nations throughout the world.
Introduction
Alternative Religions, the State, and the Globe
THOMAS ROBBINS
Religious persecution, maintains Paul Marshall, is on the rise all over the world.
In short, “the dominant pattern is the increasing political influence of religion coupled
with increasing religious repression.”2 The enhanced significance of religion and its
heightened repression are clearly related: religion is increasingly worth persecuting and
state officials embrace laissez-faire at their peril.
Religious persecution and religious conflict are presently ubiquitous. Whether it is
French officials’ “war on sects” the Chinese government’s brutal suppression of Falun
Gong, officials in Uzbekistan persecuting a number of groups to ward off a militant
Islamic insurgency, or officials of the recently dismantled Taliban regime in Afghanistan
prescribing death for attempts to convert Muslims to other faiths, the word is out that
religion is a matter of vital importance and it cannot, therefore, be left alone by the state.
A laissez-faire policy seems less and less tenable to political elites. Religion is now on
the cutting edge of governmental social control.3
The present volume and its introductory essay focus primarily on the relations
between new or alternative religions and the state in the contemporary world, and the
factors that may now be rendering this relationship increasingly volatile.4 Our volume is a
New religious movements in the twenty-first century 2
significantly extended edition of a special symposium issue of the journal, Nova Religio
(Vol. 4, No. 2, April 2001), which was devoted to “New Religions in their Political,
Legal and Religious Contexts Around the World” and which was co-edited by Phillip
Charles Lucas and this writer.
New, esoteric, and minority religious movements are emerging in many parts of the
globe and often appear to be eliciting strong opposition and various degrees of
governmental persecution. Scholars have been closely attending to this phenomenon, and
a number of symposia and edited collections appeared prior to the Spring 2001 Nova
Religio symposium that examined issues of church-state relations and religious freedom
arising in connection with new and alternative religions.5
In preparing the original symposium in Nova Religio, Lucas and I sought to assemble
a collection of original papers that probe these issues in various societies, states, and
cultures around the globe. We suggested to the original contributors that they discuss the
historical, social, and cultural contexts that are influencing the patterns of governmental
response to new religious movements (NRMs) in particular nations or regions. We
suggested that our authors might examine the role of a number of salient factors in the
societies about which they are writing, including “anticult” mobilization, the structure of
government and received pattern of church-state relations, the role of existing older
churches, the linkage of controversies over new movements to other (e.g., ethnic,
cultural, political) conflicts, the role of scholars, intelligentsia, and “cult experts,” and the
nature and (possibly disruptive) behavior of unconventional religious movements.
The present volume reprints revised and updated papers from the original journal issue
and adds eight original papers. The new chapters in some cases fill gaps in the original
symposium. The latter did not, for example, include a paper on Latin America, a
deficiency that is now made up by Robert Carpenter’s chapter dealing with Brazil’s
powerful surge of alternative spirituality. Given the popular “hunger for esotericism” to
which it responds, this alternative spirituality appears too vast and diffuse a phe-nomenon
to be seriously threatened by the apprehensive counterforces identified by Carpenter.
A number of papers in the present volume deal with and more generally with
apocalyptic violence and/or militant Islamic movements. Brian Williams’ contribution
describes governmental efforts to crush “Wahhabi Fundamentalist” movements in
Central Asia, which Williams relates to the “worldwide struggle against ” and
terrorism. A significant dimension of the paper looks at Sufism, which, as a diffuse folk
religion, was able to withstand decades of Soviet repression. Such popular Sufism is held
in contempt by Sunni reformers and is actually a target of Wahhabi revivalism. The latter
aims to “purify” a tradition alleged to be polluted by magical Sufi practices and
superstition. It is dynamic reformist Wahhabism, however, which is perceived as a threat
to relatively secular post-Soviet political elites. Thus religion-state conflicts interface in
various ways with interreligious tensions.
is also discussed in the theoretical essay by Mark Sedgwick.6 Sedgwick
explores the potentialities for applying the concept of “sect” and “sectarianism” from the
Introduction 3
sociology of religion to Islamic movements in a manner that will differentiate the groups
to which it is applied from what might be viewed as Islamic “cults” and “denominations.”
A subtypology of Islamic sects is produced which distinguishes between tariqa, and
and firqa movements. The latter are inherently unstable and more likely to become
involved in violence. is said to have the characteristics of a firqa.
Interestingly, Sedgwick rejects the applicability to Islamic groups of the voguish
scholarly concept of “new religious movement.” Scholars, Sedgwick maintains, have
tended to use the “NRM” concept as a proxy for voluntary groups in tension with the
environment. However, in Islam, old and institutionalized groups can be in tension with
the surrounding environment, while some novel, voluntary movements may not be at all
controversial. “What matters is not novelty in itself but voluntarism and tension,” asserts
Sedgwick.
“Research on NRMs in the post 9/11 World,” a theoretical essay by Benjamin
Zablocki and J.Anna Looney, presents a provocative overview of research on new
movements. Zablocki compares older structural-essentialist models with newer
interactive or process approaches. Zablocki maintains that questions of “why” need to
make room for equally important “how” questions. We must shift our focus to the “social
and cultural mechanisms used by NRMs for attaining cohesion and control and for
mobilizing resources.” How do such movements “continuously create and maintain
themselves?” Zablocki and Looney usefully review pertinent research on new movements
in a number of key areas including charismatic leadership and patterns of recruitment and
defection. They also devote attention to stressful problems of “ideological disconnection”
from the total society, particularly in the areas of apocalyptic violence and sex/gender
roles.
Apocalyptic violence is the specific topic of John Hall’s theoretical essay,
“Apocalypse 9/11,” which discusses and other groups and the significance of
apocalyptic worldviews:
However, “apocalyptic war [often] does not unfold as a one-sided series of terrorist
actions. Rather it is an interactive process” (Hall’s emphasis). As the state attempts to
control apocalyptic violence it is strongly tempted to become an apocalyptic actor itself
(my emphasis) with its own apocalyptic rationale for its social control policies. The
classic example, as Hall notes, is President Bush’s formulation of the “axis of evil” idea,
which was applied to three historically disconnected or mutually estranged nations.
“Bush thus invoked an encompassing historical struggle between good and evil, the
New religious movements in the twenty-first century 4
forces of light, and the forces of darkness…the structure of the ideology is unmistakable:
it is apocalyptic.”
Hall’s interactive analysis is convergent with the approach of Zablocki and Looney,
who identify a process of “deviance amplification” at work in apocalyptic movements.
Through this process, the continuous escalation of a conflict between a deviant group and
agents of control is understood in terms of the deepening entrapment of both parties in
interactive feedback loops of recrimination and estrangement such that the whole
“amplification” process may spiral out of control.
Sources of Tension
Rosalind Hackett’s paper on African states’ response to “false prophets” also deals partly
with explosively violent movements such as the notorious Movement for the Restoration
of the Ten Commandments as well as religious movements with paramilitarist
proclivities such as the Lord’s Resistance Army (both groups, interestingly, emerged in
Uganda). More generally, however, Hackett provides an excellent tripartite framework
for looking at the basic challenges that NRMs pose to a society and its public authority,
and for understanding the sources of tension between emergent movements and the state.
Firstly, movements may pose a direct challenge to political authority, sometimes in
tangible military terms, as instanced by the Lord’s Resistance Army, “which plagued
government troops in Uganda for a number of years in the late 1980s” (and recruited
child soldiers). Secondly, new movements are often viewed as representing a threat to
public interests, that is, the behavior of a group or its devotees or the beliefs being
espoused are seen as inimical to basic cultural values. Hackett mentions Wilson Bushara,
the leader of another controversial Ugandan group, who “offered space in Heaven after
death in return for cash.” The spectacular mass suicide/homicide of the Movement for the
Restoration of the Ten Commandments is also placed in this category, as obviously may
be the lethal behavior of groups such as the Peoples Temple, the Solar Temple, and Aum
Shinrikyō, whose violence does not directly menace the state but is seen to embody a vile
atrocity. Charges that sinister “cults” and their ruthless gurus “brainwash” and otherwise
socially, financially and sexually exploit their members as well as “break up families” are
also pertinent here, as are charges of “devil worship” and Satanism.
Thirdly, according to Hackett, new movements may mount challenges to the religious
power and authority which older churches enjoy. A “new generation” of
Evangelical/Pentecostal/charismatic modes of Christianity is making inroads at the
expense of older churches; moreover, some Pentecostals actually engage in anti-Catholic
preaching. Hackett’s three foci of tension are obviously not mutually exclusive, e.g.,
competition between rival movements may lead to accusations of devil worship. Political
and non-political (e.g., psychopathological) violence are not always easy to distinguish.
Recruitment of child soldiers may be an offense to values (public interests) as well as part
of a military threat.
In any case, the threats which new movements are perceived as posing to African
states and societies are magnified by societal disorganization and the economic and
political volatility of African states. “Faltering, debtridden African states must look to the
management of religious pluralism as part of their plans of national integration lest it
Introduction 5
Globalization
undermined in France. “The mesh of the confessional net is strained by the multiplication
of groups and movements claiming religious status and demanding the benefits of
freedom taken for granted in democratic societies.” The seemingly “anarchic
proliferation of self-proclaimed and extradenominational religious groups” is evoking
deep anxieties. A postmodern society of autonomous “believing subjects” free to “cobble
together their own systems of meaning and create new forms of association for spiritual
purposes” is a society in which institutional religious regulation will be precarious. The
somewhat panic-stricken official response is to presume that the devotees of
institutionally aberrant and unfamiliar movements are not autonomous and have
succumbed to “mental manipulation.” In an epilogue, Hervieu-Léger discusses the recent
agitation against “sectarian danger” and “mind manipulation” that resulted in the law of
May 2001. The careful, tortuous language of this statute introduces a notion of
actionable, sectarian mental manipulation or implicitly coercive psychological
domination without employing sensational terms such as “brainwashing” or even “mental
manipulation.” Since the law does not clearly define a “secte” (cult) it probably “has
little chance of becoming an effective legal tool.”
The present volume actually contains two papers dealing with the French milieu.
Hervieu-Léger’s paper deals with the cultural foundations of French discrimination.
Susan Palmer’s paper looks particularly at the impact of discrimination on the sectes and
the divergent responses of various groups. Palmer comments:
totally alien to Chinese traditions. “Not surprisingly, unorthodox beliefs were seen more
as treason than heresy.” However, one effect of the interrelationship of religion and
governance was that new religious visions tended to suggest new political arrangements
and thus to imperil the state. Chinese history has thus been characterized by messianic
religio-political insurgencies and aggressively theocratic movements. Fearful imperial
ruling elites have fiercely persecuted clandestine brotherhoods and sectarian religious
groups.
Lowe emphasizes the continuity between old imperial patterns and Maoist rule. Like
past emperors, Chairman Mao “believed in the almost magical power of society-wide
conformity and felt personally threatened by all ideological dissent.” Post-Mao leaders
have eased up a bit and allow tame, “patriotic” churches to be officially registered. The
government still “deals harshly with unregistered groups, arresting leaders and raiding
meeting places.” The latter part of Lowe’s chapter deals with the suppression of Falun
Gong.12 Lowe notes an interesting connection that may be developing between the
Chinese government and American anticultists.13
According to Lowe, the present Chinese Constitution guarantees Chinese citizens’
“freedom of religious belief” but “rather pointedly does not recognize the right to engage
in religious practices or propagate religious teachings.” This is a frequent pattern with
authoritarian regimes that want to constrain independent sects. For a state to concede
individual freedom of belief (which is essentially an intrapsychic modality) is really to
concede very little. How would a government prevent a citizen from holding an
inappropriate belief? If “freedom of religion” is conceived as the right to hold beliefs it is
implicitly defined as something essentially individual and intrapsychic such that the
implied constraint on the state is minimal. The constraint is more meaningful if the right
of collective worship, the right to organize—to have a religious community—and the
right to preach and proselytize are conceded. But simply guaranteeing the right to belief
may not meaningfully circumscribe state authority, which is why regimes desiring to
restrictively regulate religion nevertheless eagerly affirm citizens’ freedom of belief.
Oliver Cromwell prohibited the Catholic Mass, but in doing so denied that he was
infringing freedom of conscience.
Europeans often claim that their nations, too, offer religious freedom, but
to those accustomed to American standards of freedom, what is called
freedom in Europe would only be called toleration in the United States—
and often not that. In the abstract most nations of Western Europe assert
New religious movements in the twenty-first century 10
Germany, the authors imply, pursues particularly oppressive policies. German “free
churches” that do not receive state support, are in fact “hindered, harassed and closely
regulated” and are “stigmatized by the media and government” in a manner that
“generates public disapproval.”15 However, in her essay for this volume, Brigitte Schoen
maintains that in some respects Germany is less discriminatory in its policy toward new
movements than are Western European nations such as France or Belgium. Schoen’s
essay rebuts what she views as exaggerated reports in the U.S. regarding the alleged
persecution of Scientology in Germany.16 Acknowledging that the German government
considers Scientology a commercial rather than a religious organization (which may
seriously disadvantage Scientology), Schoen claims that affirmative governmental action
against Scientology has amounted to little more than surveillance (which a Berlin court
has ordered discontinued) and the issuing of informational booklets containing some
negative information.
In her essay (and more extensively in a personal dialogue with this writer), Schoen has
noted certain factors which may challenge the widespread impression that the repression
of esoteric religious minorities is substantially more severe in Western Europe and
Germany than in the U.S. Compared to European countries, the U.S. has a relatively
decentralized system of control such that discrimination “in the boondocks” against
Neopagan or New Age groups may not be highly visible. While inflammatory statements
against cults by European politicians and activists attract substantial publicity, court cases
quietly won by controversial movements (for instance, a recent decision for the Jehovah’s
Witnesses in Germany’s highest court) receive less attention. On the other hand,
constitutional protection for “free speech” in the U.S. may make pejorative statements
against NRMs as well as by NRMs in America less actionable.
Schoen notes that German law requires a balancing of the right to religious liberty
with “the basic rights of other individuals, such as a child’s right to freedom from injury
in the case of Evangelicals calling for corporal punishment.” As with other countries, the
German legal system for organizing religions as corporate bodies “fosters a highly
institutionalized, centralized organizational form for religions which one might call
bureaucracies.” Public funding for private anticult organizations (some of which had
received state aid in the 1970s and ‘80s) has decreased while church support for
anticultism has increased, as it has in several other countries.
Finally, the existence of an cell discovered in Hamburg and linked to the
depredations of 9/11 has led to a change in the German law of associations. A religious
exemption to the authority of the state to terminate associations linked to criminal or anti-
constitutional activities is no longer operative. (One Muslim extremist organization has
been banned to date.) German citizens are finding “the very notion of a terrorist variant of
religion unsettling.” Schoen notes the emotional effect of quiet, religious young men
being revealed as mass murderers. Such a development “might kindle resentments against
all kinds of minority religions. On the other hand, the new focus on Islamic extremism
Introduction 11
means that public attention no longer concentrates on the real or alleged dangers of [non-
Islamic] new religions.”
J.Gordon Melton’s fairly sanguine report on the U.S. clearly supports the idea that the
situation is more favorable to alternative religions in the U.S. than elsewhere. Melton
reviews several key historical and legal events, including setbacks suffered by the
American anticult movement. The movement, he maintains, is now little more than a
“meddlesome nuisance.” Melton makes a strong case, yet it may be somewhat overstated.
He emphasizes the importance of the federal Fishman verdict in 1990, which excludes
expert testimony about brainwashing from criminal trials on the grounds that the notion
lacks scientific credibility. Fishman, however, transpired in a mere trial (lower) federal
court, although it has been frequently cited. Yet Fishman could turn out to be a frail reed.
The influence of horrendous tragedies such as the Uganda massacre or spectacular acts of
“religious terrorism” such as produced the destruction of the World Trade Center may
lead judges—whose legal reasoning may presuppose certain “scientific knowledge”
about social behavior and the human psyche—to alter their “scientific” views. Melton
does not highlight the earlier California Supreme Court verdict in the Molko case (1988),
which affirmed that there is no constitutional or religious freedom barrier to tort actions
relying on brainwashing claims in situations where a totalistic, encapsulating group
employs recruitment practices that are substantially deceptive.17
As this writer recalls, the defeat of the anticult movement in the Fishman case was the
result of a sort of successful fallback strategy employed by its opponents in the aftermath
of Molko. The 1988 Molko verdict appeared to preclude the automatic dismissal, on First
Amendment grounds, of litigation involving brainwashing claims against religious
movements. However, the Molko court did not rule out a challenge to “expert” testimony
about mind control on the grounds that it lacks “scientific” credibility. The Fishman
verdict vindicated such a challenge in a criminal trial. The result has been to make the
outcomes of civil and criminal litigation involving brainwashing claims frequently hinge
on the resolution of pre-trial motions in limine to exclude testimony. In this connection
the work of psychologist Dick Anthony, a key consultant in the Fishman case and in
numerous subsequent cases, has been particularly valuable (from the standpoint of
beleaguered movements) in frequently getting pseudoscientific mind control testimony
excluded from evidentiary hearings.
The contribution of Robbins and Anthony in the present volume deals with legal
strategies and rhetoric, and in particular with the convergence of three influential, quasi-
legal discourses in which limitation of the scope of the First Amendment’s protection of
expressive speech acts is being advocated. In the areas of pornography, racist hate
speech, and the indoctrination practices of “cults,” it has been maintained that the speech
acts are not “only words” but represent implicitly “coercive” abuses of speech which do
not engage the critical intellect but rather operate viscerally to manipulate emotions.
Robbins and Anthony are critical of this argument but are more concerned with its
implications for the ambiguity of contemporary moral boundaries and the psychologizing
of social control.
If, as Melton maintains, the situation is particularly favorable to alternative religions in
the U.S., Great Britain, as reported by Eileen Barker, also seems to present a relatively
favorable venue. Barker discusses the blemishes on the picture, including episodes of
“Islamophobia” related to and the Ayatollah Khomeini, an ephemeral
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
moment disgusted with the world. I half wish I were at home again.
Now too, that Stuart has reminded me of our early days, I cannot
avoid sometimes picturing to myself the familiar fireside, the walks,
frolics, occupations of our childhood; and well I remember how he
used to humour my whims. Oh, these times are past, and now he
opposes me in every thing.
Adieu.
LETTER XIX
To be brief, he has convinced me, that the letter written in his name,
to the landlady, was a forgery of her own. The circumventing wretch!
I am of opinion, that it ought to be made a hanging matter.
'I have begun twenty letters to you, and have torn them
all. I write to you on my knees, and the paper is blistered
with my tears; but I have dried it with my sighs.
'Sun, moon, and stars may rise and set as they will. I know
not whether it be day, or whether it be night.
'When the girl came with your last note, the idea that your
eyes had just been dwelling on her features, on her cap,
ribbon, and apron, made her and them so interesting, so
dear to me, that, though her features are snubbed, her cap
tattered, her ribbon bottle-green (which I hate), and her
apron dirty, I should certainly have taken her in my arms, if
I had not been the most bashful of men.
'"If you love me, tell me so," said you, smiling; "but do not
hurt my foot."
In a few minutes after I had received this last billet, his lordship
came in person to perfect the reconciliation. Never was so tender, so
excruciating a scene.
Adieu.
LETTER XX
I awoke earlier, as I thought, than usual, this morning; for not a ray
penetrated my curtainless window. I then tried to compose myself to
sleep again, but in vain; so there I lay turning and tumbling about,
for eight or nine hours, at the very least. At last I became alarmed.
What can be the matter? thought I. Is the sun quenched or
eclipsed? or has the globe ceased rolling? or am I struck stone blind?
Hurrying into the hall, I saw the street door wide open, Stuart and
Montmorenci struggling with each other near it, the landlady
dragging a trunk down stairs, and looking like the ghost of a mad
housemaid; and the poet just behind her, with his corpulent mother,
bed and all, upon his back; while she kept exclaiming, that we
should all be in heaven in five minutes, and he crying out, Heaven
forbid! Heaven forbid!
Stop her, stop her! was now shouted on all sides. Hundreds seemed
in pursuit. Panting and almost exhausted, I still continued my flight.
They gained on me. What should I do? I saw the door of a carriage
just opened, and two ladies, dressed for dinner, stepping into it. I
sprang in after them, crying, save me, save me! The footman
endeavoured to drag me out; the mob gathered round shouting; the
horses took fright, and set off in full gallop; I, meantime, on one
knee, with my meek eyes raised, and my hands folded across my
bosom, awaited my fate; while the ladies gazed on me in dismay,
and supported one unbroken scream.
At last, the carriage dashed against a post, and was upset. Several
persons ran forward, and, I being uppermost, took me out the first.
Again I began running, and again a mob was at my heels. I felt
certain they would tear me in pieces. My head became bewildered;
and all the horrid sights I had ever read of rose in array before me.
Bacchantes, animated with Orphean fury, slinging their serpents in
the air, and uttering dithyrambics, appeared to surround me on
every side. On I flew. Knock it down! cried several voices.
A footman was just entering a house. I rushed past him, and into a
parlour, where a large party were sitting at dinner.
Save me! exclaimed I, and sank on my knees before them. All arose:
—some, in springing to seize me, fell; and others began dragging
me away. I grasped the table-cloth, in my confusion, and the next
instant, the whole dinner was strewn about the floor. Those who had
fallen down, rose in piteous plight; one bathed in soup, another
crowned with vegetables, and the face of a third all over harico.
They held me fast, and questioned me; then called me mad, and
turned me into the street. The mob were still waiting for me there,
and they cheered me as I came out; so seeing a shop at hand, I
darted through it, and ran up stairs, into the drawing-room.
There I found a mother in the cruel act of whipping her child. Ever a
victim to thrilling sensibility, I snatched the rod from her hand; she
shrieked and alarmed the house; and again I was turned out of
doors. Again, my friend the mob received me with a shout; again I
took to flight; rushed through another shop, was turned out—
through another, was turned out. In short, I threaded a dozen
different houses, and witnessed a dozen different domestic scenes.
In this, they were singing, in that scolding:—here, I caught an old
man kissing the maid, there, I found a young man reading the Bible.
Entering another, I heard ladies laughing and dancing in the
drawing-room. I hurried past them to the garrets, and saw their
aged servant dying.
The noise of people searching the rooms below, and ascending the
stairs, put an end to my disagreeable reflections; and I thought but
of escape. Running to the window of the garret, I found that it
opened upon the roof of a neighbouring house; and recollecting that
robbers often escape by similar means, I sprang out of the window,
closed it after me, and ran along a whole row of roofs.
At last I came to a house higher than the rest, with a small window,
similar to that by which I had just got out, and happily lying open.
On looking into the garret, I found that nobody was there, so I
scrambled into it, and fastened the window after me. A servant's
bed, a chair, a table, and an immense chest, constituted all the
furniture. The chest had nothing but a little linen in it; and I
determined to make it my place of refuge, in case of an alarm.
Here I sat some time, admiring the dresses, and trying at a mirror
how the caps became me, till I was interrupted by steps on the
stairs. I ran behind a window-curtain; and immediately three young
milliners came into the room.
'I wonder,' said one, 'whether our lodger has returned from dinner.'
'And me too,' says the first; 'and he presses my hand into the
bargain.'
'Presses!' says the second; 'why, he squeezes mine; and just think,
he tries to kiss me too.'
'I know,' says the third, who was the only pretty girl of the three,
'that he never lays a finger on me, nor speaks a word to me, good
or bad—never: and yesterday he lent me the Mysteries of Udolpho
with a very bad grace; and when I told him that I wanted it to copy
the description of the Tuscan girl's dress, as a lady had ordered me
to make up a dress like it, for the masquerade to-night, he handed
me the book, and said, that if I went there myself, the people would
take my face for a mask.'
The poor girl looked up, started, made a miserable imitation of the
heroic scream, and ran down stairs.
I ran after her, as far as the landing-place; and on looking over the
balusters, into the hall, I saw the young man who had just been with
her, listening to her account of the transaction. 'I will call the watch,'
said she, 'and do you keep guard at the door.'
She then hastened into the street, and he stood in such a manner,
that it was impossible for me to pass him.
'What is the matter?' cried the mistress of the house, coming out of
the parlour.
'A mad woman that is above stairs,' answered the young man. 'Miss
Jane has just seen her; dressed half like a man, half like a woman,
and with hair down to the ground!'
'Oh! Betty,' cried Molly, 'Miss Jane is just killed by a huge monster
above stairs, half man, half beast, all over covered with black hair,
and I don't know what other devilments besides!'
'I will run and drive it down,' cried Betty, and began ascending the
stairs. Whither could I hide? I luckily recollected the large chest; so I
flew up to the garret. It was now quite dark; but I found the chest,
sprang into it, and having closed the lid, flung some of the linen over
me. I then heard the girl enter the next room, and in a few
moments, she came into mine, with another person.
'Here is the trunk, Tom,' said she, 'and I must lock it on you till the
search is over. You see, Tom, what risks I am running on your
account; for there is Miss Jane, killed by it, and lying in bits, all
about the floor.'
The man had now jumped into the chest; the girl locked it in an
instant, took out the key, and ran down.
'What's this! Oh! mercy, what's this?' cried he, feeling about.
'Help!' vociferated he. ''Tis the monster—here is the hair! help, help!'
'Hush!' said I, 'or you will betray both of us. I am no monster, but a
woman.'
'Wasn't? it you that murdered the milliner?' said he, still trembling.
'No, really,' replied I, 'but now not a word; for I hear people coming.'
'That is locked this month past,' said the voice of the maid who had
hidden the man in it, 'so you need not look there.'
They then searched the remaining garrets; and I heard them say, as
they were going down stairs, that I must have jumped out of a
window.
'And now, Madam,' said the man, 'will you have the goodness to tell
me who you are?'
'Young and innocent!' cried he, 'good ingredients, faith. Come then,
my dear; I will protect you.'
The man darted out like an arrow; she remained motionless with
astonishment at seeing me, while I lay there, almost exhausted;
though, as usual, not worth a swoon. I do believe, that the five
fingers I am writing with would leave me, sooner than my five
senses.
'She has confessed to the murder!' cried the man; while the maid
held by his arm, and shrunk back, as I rose from the chest with an
air of dignity.
'Be not frightened, my friends,' said I smiling, 'for I assure you that I
am no murderess; and that the milliner is alive and well, at this
moment. Is she not, young woman?'
'Mercy me!' cried the maid; 'how could they dare for to say that so
rich a lady murdered the girl?'
I therefore glided into the room, and seated myself just opposite to
her.
'Do you remember the mad woman with the long hair?' said I, as I
took off my bonnet, and let down my tresses, with all the grandeur
of virtue victorious over vice.
'You are the very person, I believe,' faltered she. 'What upon earth
shall I do?'
'Do?' cried I. 'Why, sell me the Tuscan dress of course. The fact is—
but let it go no farther—I am a heroine; I am, I give you my word
and honour. So, you know, the lady being wronged of the dress,
(inasmuch as she is but an individual), is as nothing compared with
the wrong that the community will sustain, if they lose the pleasure
of finding that I get it from you. Sure the whole scene, since I came
to this house, was contrived for the express purpose of my procuring
that individual costume; and just conceive what pretty confusion
must take place, if, after all, you prevent me! My dear girl, we must
do poetical justice. We must not disappoint the reader.
'You will tell me, perhaps, that selling the dress is improper?
Granted. But, recollect, what improper things are constantly done, in
novels, to bring about a pre-determined event. Your amour with the
gentleman, for instance; which I shall certainly tell your employer, if
you refuse to sell me the dress.
'As you value your own peace of mind, therefore, and in the name of
all that is just, generous, and honourable, I conjure you to reflect for
a moment, and you must see the matter in its rational light. What
can you answer to these arguments?'
'That the person who could use them,' said she, 'will never listen to
reason. I see what is the matter with you, and that I have no
resource but to humour you, or be ruined.' And she began crying.
I then called a coach, and drove to Jerry Sullivan's; for I would not
return to my lodgings, lest the conspirators there should prevent me
from going to the masquerade.
The poor fellow jumped with joy when he saw me; but I found him
in great distress. His creditors had threatened his little shop with
immediate ruin, unless he would discharge his debts. He had now
provided the whole sum due, except forty pounds; but this he could
not procure, and the creditors were expected every minute.
'I have only twelve guineas in the world,' said I, opening my casket,
'but they are at your service.' And I put them into his hand.
'Dear Lady!' cried the wife, 'what a mortal sight of jewels you have
got! Do you know, now, I could borrow thirty pounds at least on
them, at the pawnbroker's; and that sum would just answer.'
'Nay,' said I, 'I cannot consent to part with them; though, had I
thirty pounds, I would sooner give it to you, than buy jewels with it.'
'Sure then,' cried she, 'by the same rule, you would sooner sell your
jewels, than let me want thirty pounds.'
'You have,' answered she, 'and that is what vexes me. If you had
given me nothing at all, I would not have minded, because you were
a stranger. But first to make yourself our friend, by giving us twelve
guineas, and then to refuse us the remainder—'tis so unnatural!'
How could I remain unmoved? In short, I slipped the casket into the
wife's hand; out she ran with it, and in a few minutes returned with
forty pounds. The creditors received the money due, passed
receipts, and departed, and Jerry returned me the twelve guineas,
saying: 'Bless your sweet face, for 'tis that is the finger-post to
heaven, though, to be sure, I can't look strait in it, after all you have
done for me. Och! 'tis a murder to be under an obligation: so if just
a little bit of mischief would happen you, and I to relieve you, as you
did me, why that would make me aisy.'
Adieu.
LETTER XXI
Hardly had I been seated five minutes, when an infirm and reverend
old man approached, and sat down beside me. His feeble form was
propt upon a long staff, a palsy shook his white locks, and his
garments had all the quaintness of antiquity.
'Speak, I beseech you!' cried I. 'Are you, indeed, the ancient and
loyal vassal?'
'Now by my fay,' said he, 'I will say forth my say. My name is
Whylome Eftsoones, and I was accounted comely when a younker.
But what boots that now? Beauty is like unto a flower of the field.—
Good my lady, pardon a garrulous old man. So as I was saying, the
damozels were once wont to leer at me right waggishly; but time
changeth all things, as the proverb saith; and time hath changed my
face, from that of a blithesome Ganymede to one of those heads
which Guido has often painted; mild, pale, penetrating. Good my
lady, I must tell thee a right pleasant and quaint saying of a certain
nun, touching my face.'
'Certes, my lady,' said he. 'Well, I was first taken, as a bonny page,
into the service of thy great great grandfader's fader's brother; and I
was in at the death of these four generations, till at last, I became
seneschal to thine honoured fader, Lord De Willoughby. His lordship
married the Lady Hysterica Belamour, and thou wast the sole
offspring of that ill-fated union.
'Soon after thy birth, thy noble father died of an apparition; or, as
some will have it, of stewed lampreys. Returning, impierced with
mickle dolour, from his funeral, which took place at midnight, I was
stopped on a common, by a tall figure, with a mirksome cloak, and a
flapped hat. I shook grievously, ne in that ghastly dreriment wist
how myself to bear.'
'I mean,' said he, 'I was in such a fright I did not know what to do.
Anon, he threw aside his disguise, and I beheld—Lord Gwyn!'
'Yea,' said he. 'Lord Gwyn, who was ywedded unto Lord De
Willoughby's sister, the Lady Eleanor.'
'Thou sayest truly,' replied he. '"My good Eftsoones," whispered Lord
Gwyn to me, "know you not that my wife, Lady Eleanor Gwyn, will
enjoy all the extensive estates of her brother, Lord De Willoughby, if
that brother's infant, the little Cherubina, were no more?"
'"I trow, ween, and wote, 'tis as your lordship saith," answered I.
'"Eftsoones," said he, with a hollow voice, "if this dagger be planted
in a child's heart, it will grow, and bear a golden flower!"
'He spake, and incontinently took to striding away from me, in such
wise, that maulgre and albe, I gan make effort after him, nathlesse
and algates did child Gwyn forthwith flee from mine eyne.'
'I protest most solemnly,' said I, 'I do not understand five words in
the whole of that last sentence!'
'And yet, my lady,' replied he, ''tis the pure well of English undefiled,
and such as was yspoken in mine youth.'
'But what can you mean by child Gwyn?' said I. 'Surely his lordship
was no suckling at this time.'
'When the dear lady, your mother, missed you, she went through the
most elegant extravagancies; till, having plucked the last hair from
her head, she ran wild into the woods, and has never been heard of
since.'
'A few days ago,' continued Eftsoones, 'a messenger out of breath
came to tell me, that the peasant to whom I had consigned you was
dying, and wished to see me. I went. Such a scene! He confessed to
me that he had sold you, body and bones, as he inelegantly
expressed it, to one farmer Wilkinson, about thirteen years before;
for that this farmer, having discovered your illustrious birth,
speculated on a handsome consideration from Lord Gwyn, for
keeping the secret. Now I am told there is a certain parchment——'
'Which I have!' cried I.
'Which I have!'
'Then your title is made out, as clear as the sun,' said he; 'and I
bow, in contrition, before Lady Cherubina de Willoughby, rightful
heiress of all the territory now appertaining, or that may hereinafter
appertain, to the House of De Willoughby.'
'Nothing easier,' answered he. 'Lady Gwyn (for his lordship is dead)
resides at this moment on your estate, which lies about thirty miles
from Town; so to-morrow morning you shall set off to see her
ladyship, and make your claims known to her. I will send a trusty
servant with you, and will myself proceed before you, to prepare her
for your arrival. You will therefore find me there.'
The moment he addressed me, old Eftsoones slunk away; nor could
I catch another glimpse of him during that night.
We then walked up and down the room, while I gave him an account
of the ancient and loyal vassal, and of all that I had heard respecting
my family. He was silent on the subject; and only begged of me to
point out Eftsoones, as soon as I should see him; but that
interesting old man never appeared. However, I was in great hopes
of another adventure; for a domino now began hovering about us so
much, that Stuart at last addressed it; but it glided away. He said he
knew it was Betterton.
'For,' said he, 'I think I know this old Eftsoones; and if so, I fancy
you will find me useful in unravelling part of the mystery. Besides, I
would assist, with all my soul, in any plan tending to withdraw you
from the metropolis.'
I snatched at his offer with joy; and it was then fixed that we should
take a chaise the next morning, and go together.
Matters were soon arranged, and we have just separated for the
night.
Well, Biddy, what say you now? Have I not made a glorious
expedition of it? A young, rich, beautiful titled heiress already—think
of that, Biddy.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookfinal.com