16.

1 Technology Presentation - Budding Potential

The concept of "Budding Potential" in the context of a 16.1 Technology Presentation typically
refers to the emerging opportunities and promise found in new digital and information
technologies. The key idea is that technology—particularly broadband, artificial intelligence (AI),
the Internet of Things (IoT), and digital networks—has vast potential for innovation and
transformation across industries and society, but this potential is still developing ("budding") and
requires supportive environments to fully flourish. [1]

The Nature of Innovation

The digital revolution is fostering new forms of innovation, allowing for nearly costless creativity
beyond traditional research and development. Technologies like distributed manufacturing,
blockchains, digitization, and platform-based models (for instance, ride-sharing or digital
banking) are examples of “budding” innovations that shift how goods, services, and processes
are conceived and delivered. [1]

Continuous Pressure to Innovate

Firms and governments face increasing pressure to continually innovate, not just in terms of new
products, but also in business models and operational processes. The capacity to harness these
new digital tools is becoming a key differentiator among countries and companies. However,
many businesses are not keeping up, with stagnation in ICT adoption slowing the full realization
of the potential these technologies offer. [1]

Key Points on Budding Potential

Emergence of New Innovations: Digital technologies are enabling ground-breaking
innovations with minimal cost, rapidly transforming traditional sectors. [1]
Business Model Transformation: Companies must continuously adopt and adapt
technology to remain competitive, leading to new models and strategies. [1]
Role of Global Networks: The power of technology depends on robust, open networks;
barriers to digital flows risk stifling creativity and the spread of new businesses. [1]
Challenges and Opportunities: The full budding potential can only be unleashed if key
obstacles—like slow adoption and digital barriers—are addressed. [1]
Overall, the “budding potential” in technology emphasizes a phase of ongoing, rapid growth in
opportunities and innovation, but also highlights the necessity for governments, businesses, and
societies to nurture these trends if they hope to benefit fully from them. [1]
⁂
HVAC Energy Optimization Strategies - Comprehensive Summary
Based on my analysis of the attached HVAC optimization guide, I've identified and categorized
all 20 energy optimization strategies into 5 core methodology/technology categories. These
strategies align well with your project at IGIS Management, particularly the optimal start/stop
and dynamic temperature setpoint management you've already identified.

Summary of All 20 Strategies by Category

Category 1: System Supervisory Control Optimizations (4 strategies)

These are high-level control strategies implemented through the Building Management System
(BMS) that coordinate overall HVAC system operation:
1. Optimum Start/Stop Programming
Energy Savings: Up to 10% of total HVAC energy
Description: Automatically calculates optimal HVAC start/stop times based on building
thermal response, outdoor temperature, and occupancy schedules to minimize operating
hours. Uses adaptive learning to adjust start times (e.g., 6:30am-8:30am variable vs. fixed
6am start).
Relevance to your project: ✓ Already identified in your building analysis
2. Space Temperature Set Points and Control Bands
Energy Savings: Up to 20% of total HVAC energy
Description: Optimizes space temperature set points, dead bands, and proportional bands
(e.g., 20-22°C winter, 24-26°C summer with 2-3°C dead band). Each 1°C change affects
energy consumption by ~10%.
Relevance to your project: ✓ Already identified as dynamic temperature setpoint
management
3. Master Air Handling Unit Supply Air Temperature Signal
Energy Savings: Up to 15% of total HVAC energy
Description: Creates optimized master temperature signal from multiple VAV zones using
weighted average (instead of "high select") to minimize overcooling and excessive
reheating.
4. Staging of Chillers and Compressors
Energy Savings: Up to 10% of chiller energy
Description: Optimizes the sequencing and operation of multiple chillers/compressors
based on actual load, efficiency curves, and proper stage-up/stage-down criteria rather
than fixed schedules.
Category 2: Plant Control Parameter Optimizations (5 strategies)
These strategies optimize the control parameters of individual HVAC plant equipment:
5. Duct Static Pressure Reset (DSPR)
Energy Savings: Up to 30% of AHU fan energy
Description: Dynamically resets duct static pressure set point by monitoring VAV box
positions, keeping the most open box at 90-95% to minimize fan energy consumption.
6. Temperature Reset - Heating Hot Water (HHW)
Energy Savings: Up to 5% of HW heater energy
Description: Resets hot water delivery temperature based on outdoor temperature and
demand to improve boiler efficiency (especially beneficial with condensing boilers).
7. Temperature Reset - Chilled Water (CHW)
Energy Savings: Up to 15% of chiller energy
Description: Resets chilled water supply temperature based on load conditions and outdoor
temperature to improve chiller efficiency. Higher CHW temperature = less chiller work.
8. Temperature Reset - Condenser Water (CW)
Energy Savings: Up to 15% of chiller energy
Description: Resets condenser water temperature based on wet bulb temperature and load
to optimize chiller performance while balancing cooling tower fan efficiency.
9. Retrofit of Electronic Expansion Valves (EEV)
Energy Savings: Up to 15% of AC compressor energy
Description: Replaces thermostatic expansion valves (TXV) with electronic expansion
valves for better refrigerant flow control, reduced superheat requirements, and improved
part-load performance.

Category 3: Ventilation & Airflow Optimizations (4 strategies)

These strategies optimize outdoor air usage and ventilation rates:
10. Economy Cycle (Free Cooling)
Energy Savings: Up to 20% of AC compressor energy
Description: Uses outdoor air for "free cooling" when outdoor conditions are suitable
(temperature and humidity), reducing mechanical cooling load.
11. Night Purge
Energy Savings: Up to 20% of AC compressor energy during start-up
Description: Pre-cools building during cool nights using outdoor air to reduce morning start-
up cooling requirements.
12. Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) - CO₂ Based
Energy Savings: Up to 20% of cooling/heating energy for outdoor air pre-treatment
Description: Modulates outdoor air ventilation rates based on CO₂ levels in occupied
spaces rather than providing constant maximum ventilation.
13. Demand Control Ventilation (DCV) - CO Based
Energy Savings: Up to 80% of carpark ventilation fan energy
Description: Controls carpark/loading dock ventilation based on carbon monoxide (CO)
levels instead of continuous 24/7 operation.

Category 4: Variable Speed Based Optimizations (3 strategies)

These strategies utilize Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) and variable speed technology:
14. Optimised Secondary Chilled Water Pumping (Differential Pressure Reset)
Energy Savings: Up to 30% of secondary CHW pump energy
Description: Uses differential pressure reset for secondary CHW pumps based on valve
positions to minimize pumping energy (similar to DSPR for air systems).
15. Variable Head Pressure Control (Air-Cooled Condensers)
Energy Savings: Up to 30% of condenser fan energy
Description: Uses VSD control of condenser fans to maintain optimal head pressure for air-
cooled systems based on ambient dry bulb conditions.
16. Variable Head Pressure Control (Water-Cooled Condensers)
Energy Savings: Up to 30% of CW pump energy
Description: Uses VSD control of condenser water pumps or modulating valves to maintain
optimal head pressure for water-cooled systems based on wet bulb conditions.

Category 5: Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Best Practices (4 strategies)

These are operational and management strategies that support and maintain optimization:
17. Energy Management Planning
Energy Savings: Up to 50% of total energy (depending on depth and commitment)
Description: Develops comprehensive energy management framework including energy
policies, targets, KPIs, monitoring systems, and continuous improvement processes.
18. Energy Management Training and Awareness
Energy Savings: Up to 10% of total energy
 Description: Provides training and awareness programs for building operators and
occupants on energy-efficient HVAC operation and the importance of maintaining optimized
settings.
19. Energy Efficiency Maintenance
Energy Savings: Up to 20% of total HVAC energy
Description: Implements regular maintenance focused on energy efficiency including
sensor calibration, damper operation checks, filter cleaning, belt tension, and system
performance verification.
20. Management of System Control Software
Energy Savings: Up to 10% of HVAC energy
Description: Manages BMS software including proper documentation, change control
procedures, trend logging, alarm management, and preventing unauthorized changes to
optimized settings.

Distribution by Category:
Category Number of Strategies Focus Area

System Supervisory Control 4 High-level BMS coordination and scheduling

Plant Control Parameters 5 Equipment-specific control optimization

Ventilation & Airflow 4 Outdoor air and ventilation management

Variable Speed Based 3 VSD implementation for pumps/fans

O&M Best Practices 4 Operational excellence and sustainability

Key Insights for Your IGIS Management Presentation:

1. You've already identified 2 of the highest-impact strategies (Opportunities #1 and #2),
which together can save up to 30% of total HVAC energy
2. Quick wins for immediate implementation could include strategies that require minimal
capital investment:
Temperature resets (#6, #7, #8)
Master AHU temperature signal (#3)
Chiller staging optimization (#4)
3. Medium-term opportunities requiring some investment:
DSPR (#5) and pump optimization (#14) if VSDs are present
Economy cycle and night purge (#10, #11)
DCV if sensors can be installed (#12, #13)
4. Foundation for long-term success:
 Energy management planning (#17)
Training programs (#18)
Maintenance protocols (#19)
BMS management (#20)
I've created a comprehensive CSV file with all strategies that you can use for your presentation
materials.
Would you like me to help you create presentation slides that map these strategies to your
team's core capabilities and technology offerings for IGIS Management?
⁂

Great. Ignore category 5 for the time being.

Can you please do a deep dive reserach into each of the other solutions and find as much
granular technical detail (equations, graphs, visuals, engineering and techy and sophisticated
stuff please) for other solutions please. I want excruciating detail for each solution, like phd level
detail of each solution
I will continue the deep dive for all remaining strategies, but the optimal start/stop control and
setpoint management, as well as master air temperature signal/vav system topics now have
multiple sets of technical equations, models, and control strategies available. I will begin
compiling the "excruciating detail" report for those immediately, before proceeding to the next
batch.
⁂

Great. I don't see your results. Please continue

Now let me compile the comprehensive deep dive research document with all the technical
details I've gathered.

Deep Dive Technical Research: HVAC Optimization Solutions

PhD-Level Analysis of Control Strategies Excluding Category 5

CATEGORY 1: SYSTEM SUPERVISORY CONTROL

1. OPTIMAL START/STOP PROGRAMMING
Theoretical Foundation - Bang-Bang Control Theory
Optimal start/stop control is founded on bang-bang control theory, which states that energy
minimization is achieved when the HVAC system operates at either full capacity (ON) or zero
capacity (OFF). This eliminates inefficient partial-load operation during unoccupied periods. [92]
[93]

Mathematical Models
Building Thermal Response Model (3rd Order Thermal Circuit) [92]
The building thermal dynamics are captured using a resistance-capacitance (RC) network:

dT_Osurf/dt = (T_outside - T_Osurf)/(R_Eo*C_Eo) + (T_Isurf - T_Osurf)/(R_Em*C_Eo) + S_1/C

dT_Isurf/dt = (T_Osurf - T_Isurf)/(R_Em*C_Ei) + (T_Z - T_Isurf)/(R_Ei*C_Ei) + S_2/C_Ei

dT_Z/dt = (T_outside - T_Z)/(R_Win*C_Z) + (T_Isurf - T_Z)/(R_Ei*C_Z) + S_3/C_Z

Where:
T_Z = zone temperature
T_Isurf = inside wall surface temperature
T_Osurf = outside wall surface temperature
R_Eo, R_Em, R_Ei, R_Win = thermal resistances
C_Eo, C_Ei, C_Z = thermal capacitances
S_1, S_2, S_3 = heat gains
Temperature Response Curves [93]
Heat-up Curve (ON-period):

y_ON(x) = y_ss + (y_1 - y_ss) * exp((x - x_1) / τ_ON)

Cool-down Curve (OFF-period):

y_OFF(x) = y_∞ + (y_3 - y_∞) * exp((x - x_3) / τ_OFF)

Where:
y = temperature
x = time
τ_ON, τ_OFF = time constants (determined from two data points)
y_ss = steady-state temperature as x → ∞ (ON-period), approximated as 1.5 * y_set
 y_∞ = steady-state temperature as x → ∞ (OFF-period), equals y_min
Time Constant Determination: [93]

τ_ON = (x_2 - x_1) / ln[(y_1 - y_ss)/(y_2 - y_ss)]

τ_OFF = (x_4 - x_3) / ln[(y_3 - y_∞)/(y_4 - y_∞)]

Optimal Start Time Calculation

The optimal start time is found by determining the intersection of the cool-down and updated
heat-up curves using the regula falsi method (false position method): [93]

f(x) = y_ON(x) - y_OFF(x) = 0

Algorithm:
1. Define interval [x_L, x_R] where root exists
2. Calculate: x' = x_R - f(x_R) * (x_R - x_L) / (f(x_R) - f(x_L))
3. If |f(x')| < ε, then x_start = x'
4. Else, update interval and repeat
Dead Time Compensation: [93]
The actual start time must account for system lag:

x_start_actual = x_start - d_ON

Where d_ON is the "flat response" period defined as the duration where |y_final - y_initial| < ε
Curve Update with Offset Correction: [93]

y_ON_NEW(x) = y_ss + (y_1' - y_ss) * exp((x - x_1') / τ_ON)

Where: x_1' = x_1 + (x_occ - x_d)

x_d = time when temperature reaches setpoint

x_occ = start of occupancy
Markov Decision Process (MDP) Formulation [94]
For advanced stochastic optimal control:
State Space: S_t = [T_outdoor, H_outdoor, T_indoor, H_indoor, N_occupants]
Action Space: A_t = [G_FAU, T_FAU, G_FCU, T_FCU]
Objective Function:
 min J = E[Σ(t=0 to T-1) c_t * (η*(C_FCU + C_FAU) + F_FCU + F_FAU) * Δt]

Subject to:
System dynamics (thermal model)
Comfort constraints (PMV model)
Equipment limits
Solution Method: Gradient-based learning with Monte Carlo simulation
Performance Metrics [92] [93]
Energy savings: 20-50% vs constant operation
Typical payback: < 2 years
Dead time identification accuracy: ±15 minutes with 0.25°C threshold

2. SPACE TEMPERATURE SETPOINT & CONTROL BANDS

PMV (Predicted Mean Vote) Thermal Comfort Model [95] [96] [94]
Core PMV Equation (ISO 7730):

PMV = [0.303*exp(-0.036*M) + 0.028] *

{(M-W) - H - E_c - C_res - E_res}

Where:
M = metabolic rate (W/m²), typically 1.0-1.2 met for office work
W = external work (W/m²), usually 0 for sedentary
H = sensible heat loss
E_c = evaporative heat loss from skin
C_res = convective heat loss from respiration
E_res = evaporative heat loss from respiration
Heat Balance Components: [95]
Sensible Heat Loss:

H = 3.96×10^-8 * f_cl * [(T_cl + 273)^4 - (T_r + 273)^4] + f_cl * h_c * (T_cl - T_a)

Clothing Temperature (implicit equation):

T_cl = 35.7 - 0.028*(M-W) - I_cl*{3.96×10^-8*f_cl*[(T_cl+273)^4-(T_r+273)^4] + f_cl*h_c*(

Where:
T_cl = clothing surface temperature (°C)
T_r = mean radiant temperature (°C)
T_a = air temperature (°C)
I_cl = clothing insulation (clo), 0.5 summer / 1.0 winter
f_cl = clothing area factor = 1.0 + 1.29*I_cl for I_cl ≤ 0.078 m²·K/W
h_c = convective heat transfer coefficient
PPD (Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied):

PPD = 100 - 95*exp(-0.03353*PMV^4 - 0.2179*PMV^2)

Optimal Setpoint Determination [96] [97]

Summer Cooling Setpoint:
Target: PMV = 0 to +0.5

T_cooling = 24°C + adjustment(I_cl, v_a, RH)

Range: 24-26°C for typical office (0.5 clo, 0.1-0.2 m/s velocity)
Winter Heating Setpoint:
Target: PMV = -0.5 to 0

T_heating = 21°C + adjustment(I_cl, v_a, RH)

Range: 20-22°C for typical office (1.0 clo)

Dead Band Optimization [98] [99]
Energy Impact:

E_savings = k_1 * ΔT_deadband + k_2 * (ΔT_deadband)^2

Where:
k_1 ≈ 5-10% savings per °C deadband increase
k_2 accounts for non-linear effects
Typical Dead Bands:
Minimum: 1°C (tight control, high energy)
Optimal: 2-3°C (balance comfort/energy)
Maximum: 4-5°C (maximum savings, may affect comfort)
Adaptive Thermal Comfort Model (ASHRAE 55) [100] [101]
For naturally ventilated buildings:

T_comfort = 0.31 * T_outdoor_mean + 17.8°C ± 3.5°C (80% acceptability)

T_comfort = 0.31 * T_outdoor_mean + 17.8°C ± 2.5°C (90% acceptability)

Where T_outdoor_mean = running mean outdoor temperature over 7-30 days

Control Strategy Implementation [97]
PI Controller with Dead Band:

u(t) = K_p * e(t) + K_i * ∫e(τ)dτ

Where e(t) = 0 if |T_zone - T_setpoint| < deadband/2

= T_zone - (T_setpoint + deadband/2) if T_zone > T_setpoint + deadband/2
= T_zone - (T_setpoint - deadband/2) if T_zone < T_setpoint - deadband/2

Performance Metrics [96] [97] [98]

Energy savings: 5-10% per 1°C setpoint adjustment
Dead band impact: 10-30% additional savings with 3°C dead band
Comfort maintenance: PMV maintained within ±0.5 for 90% satisfaction

3. MASTER AHU SUPPLY AIR TEMPERATURE SIGNAL

Control Logic Options [102] [103] [104]
High-Select (Max) Strategy:

T_SAT_master = max(T_SAT_zone_1, T_SAT_zone_2, ..., T_SAT_zone_n)

Advantages:
Ensures all zones can be satisfied
Simple implementation
No zone starvation
Disadvantages:
May result in excessive reheat in other zones
Not optimal for energy
Weighted Average Strategy:

T_SAT_master = Σ(w_i * T_SAT_zone_i * Q_i) / Σ(Q_i)

Where:
w_i = weighting factor for zone i
Q_i = airflow to zone i
Reset Schedule Optimization [105] [102]
Linear Outdoor Air Temperature Reset:

T_SAT = T_SAT_min + (T_SAT_max - T_SAT_min) * (T_OA - T_OA_low) / (T_OA_high - T_OA_low)

Typical values:
T_SAT_min = 12-13°C (55°F)
T_SAT_max = 16-18°C (60-65°F)
T_OA_low = 10°C (50°F)
T_OA_high = 27°C (80°F)
Optimal Reset Schedule (Non-Linear): [102] [105]
Research shows optimal schedule has 5 distinct zones:
Zone 1 (T_OA ≤ T_OA_low): T_SAT = T_SAT_min
Zone 2 (T_OA_low < T_OA ≤ T_OA_lhum): Linear increase
Zone 3 (T_OA_lhum < T_OA ≤ T_OA_hhum): Plateau for humidity control
Zone 4 (T_OA_hhum < T_OA ≤ T_OA_high): Steep linear increase
Zone 5 (T_OA > T_OA_high): T_SAT = T_SAT_max
Energy Optimization: [102]
Minimize total cost:

Cost_total = Cost_cooling + Cost_reheat + Cost_fan

Where:
Cost_cooling = ∫(Q_cooling(T_SAT) / COP(T_cond)) * rate_elec * dt
Cost_reheat = ∫Q_reheat(T_SAT, T_zone) * rate_heat * dt
Cost_fan = ∫P_fan(Q(T_SAT)) * rate_elec * dt

Trade-off Analysis:
Lower T_SAT → ↓ cooling load, ↑ reheat, ↓ fan power (lower flow)
Higher T_SAT → ↑ cooling load, ↓ reheat, ↑ fan power (higher flow)
VAV Box Reheat Control [104] [106]
Dual Maximum Logic:
 If T_zone < T_zone_setpoint - deadband:
Q_air = min(Q_design, Q_required_heating)
If Q_air = Q_design and still heating needed:
Activate reheat coil

Discharge Air Temperature Reset by Zone: [106]

T_discharge_target = f(most_demanding_zone)
Reset when: All zones satisfied with T_discharge > T_discharge_min

Performance Metrics [105] [102]

Optimal vs linear reset: 5-15% additional energy savings
Reheat reduction: Up to 40% with proper SAT reset
Fan energy: May increase 5-10% with higher SAT
Net savings: 10-25% total HVAC energy

4. STAGING OF CHILLERS & COMPRESSORS

Chiller Performance Fundamentals [107] [108] [109]
Coefficient of Performance (COP):

COP = Q_evap / W_comp

Partial Load Ratio (PLR):

PLR = Q_actual / Q_rated

Efficiency Curves - Gordon-Ng Model: [108]

1/COP = a_1 * PLR^-1 + a_2 + a_3 * PLR

Or equivalently:
W_comp = Q_evap * (a_1/PLR + a_2 + a_3*PLR)

Where a_1, a_2, a_3 are regression coefficients from manufacturer data
Alternative Model - Quadratic Form: [107]

COP = COP_design * (c_0 + c_1*PLR + c_2*PLR^2) * f(T_cond, T_evap)

Condenser Temperature Effect:

 f(T_cond) = d_0 + d_1*T_cond + d_2*T_cond^2

Sequencing Control - Critical Point Method [107]

Critical Point Calculation:

CP_n = η * Σ(i=1 to n) Q_rated_i

Where:
CP_n = Critical point to bring n-th chiller online
η = Safety factor (typically 0.85-0.95)
Q_rated_i = Rated capacity of chiller i

State Machine Logic: [107]

If Q_load > CP_n AND (t - t_last_stage) > t_wait:

Stage ON chiller (n+1)

If Q_load < (CP_n - deadband) AND (t - t_last_stage) > t_wait:

Stage OFF chiller n

Where:
deadband = typically 10-20% of rated capacity
t_wait = minimum wait time (15-30 minutes)

Optimal Load Distribution [108] [107]

Optimization Problem:

Minimize: P_total = Σ P_chiller_i(Q_i) + Σ P_pump_i + Σ P_tower_i

Subject to:
Σ Q_i ≥ Q_total_load
Q_min_i ≤ Q_i ≤ Q_max_i for active chillers
T_CHW_supply ≤ T_CHW_setpoint

Lagrangian Multiplier Method: [108]

For identical chillers at equal PLR:

∂P_i/∂Q_i = λ (constant for all i)

For non-identical chillers:

Q_opt_i = f(COP_curve_i, Q_total, constraints)

Dynamic Programming Solution: [110]

Stage-wise optimization:

J_k(Q_rem) = min[P_k(Q_k) + J_{k+1}(Q_rem - Q_k)]

Where:
J_k = Cost-to-go from stage k
Q_rem = Remaining load to be met

Condenser Water Temperature Reset Integration [109] [111]

Combined Optimization:

Minimize: E_total = E_chiller(Q_i, T_CW) + E_cooling_tower(T_CW, T_WB) + E_pumps

Subject to:
T_CW ≥ T_CW_min (refrigerant flow constraint)
T_CW ≤ T_WB + approach_min

Optimal Condenser Temperature: [112]

T_CW_opt = T_WB + approach

Where approach varies: 3-7°C depending on load and ambient

Model Predictive Control (MPC) Framework [109]

Prediction Horizon Optimization:

min Σ(t=t_k to t_k+H) [P_total(t) * Δt]

Subject to:
System dynamics
Equipment constraints
Load forecast: Q_forecast(t)
Weather forecast: T_WB_forecast(t)

Receding Horizon Implementation:

Optimize over horizon H (e.g., 2-4 hours)
Implement first control interval
Update forecasts and re-optimize
Performance Metrics [109] [108] [107]
Optimal sequencing vs fixed: 5-15% energy savings
Load distribution optimization: 3-8% additional savings
Combined with CW reset: 10-20% total chiller plant savings
Typical improvement in average COP: 0.3-0.5 increase
CATEGORY 2: PLANT CONTROL PARAMETERS

5. DUCT STATIC PRESSURE RESET (DSPR)

Fan Power Fundamentals [113] [114]
Fan Power Equation:

P_fan = (ΔP * Q) / (η_fan * η_motor * η_VFD)

Where:
ΔP = Total static pressure (Pa or in. H₂O)
Q = Airflow rate (m³/s or CFM)
η_fan = Fan efficiency (typically 0.6-0.8)
η_motor = Motor efficiency (typically 0.85-0.95)
η_VFD = VFD efficiency (typically 0.95-0.98)

Fan Affinity Laws: [113]

Q₂/Q₁ = (N₂/N₁)
ΔP₂/ΔP₁ = (N₂/N₁)²
P₂/P₁ = (N₂/N₁)³

Where N = fan speed (RPM or Hz)

Critical Insight: Reducing fan speed by 20% → Power reduction of ~50%

Static Pressure Reset Algorithms
Trim and Respond Method: [115] [113]

Every t_sample:
Count N_open = number of VAV boxes with damper > threshold

If N_open > N_max:

ΔP_setpoint = ΔP_setpoint + δP_trim

ElseIf N_open < N_min:

ΔP_setpoint = ΔP_setpoint - δP_trim

Else:
ΔP_setpoint = unchanged

Constrain: ΔP_min ≤ ΔP_setpoint ≤ ΔP_max

Typical Parameters: [113]

threshold = 85-95% damper opening
 N_min = 2-3 zones
N_max = 4-6 zones
δP_trim = 0.05-0.1 in. H₂O (12-25 Pa)
t_sample = 5-10 minutes
ΔP_min = 0.5-0.75 in. H₂O
ΔP_max = Design static pressure
Direct Damper Position Control: [116]

ΔP_setpoint = K_p * (damper_target - damper_max) + ΔP_base

Where:
damper_target = 90-95% (desired maximum opening)
damper_max = max(damper_1, damper_2, ..., damper_n)
K_p = Proportional gain
ΔP_base = Minimum pressure for system operation

Advanced: Building Pressure-Based Reset: [117]

ΔP_setpoint = f(max_valve_position, building_DP)

If building_DP < (building_DP_setpoint - deadband):

Stage up: ΔP_setpoint += increment

If building_DP > (building_DP_setpoint + deadband):

Stage down: ΔP_setpoint -= increment

Rogue Zone Detection (FDD) [113]

Detection Rules:
Rule 1 - Communication Error:

If (communication_timeout > threshold):

Exclude VAV box from reset algorithm

Rule 2 - Stuck Damper (Fully Open):

If (damper_position ≥ 98%) AND (airflow < threshold):

Flag as stuck open
Exclude from reset

Rule 3 - Stuck Damper (Fully Closed):

If (damper_position ≤ 2%) AND (airflow > threshold):

Flag as stuck closed
 Exclude from reset

Rule 4 - Stale Position:

If |damper_position(t) - damper_position(t-Δt)| < ε for t > t_stale:

Flag as stale
Exclude from reset

System Dynamics & Stability [118] [116]

Pressure-Flow Relationship:

ΔP = K * Q²

Where K = system resistance coefficient

VAV Damper Dynamics:

Q_zone = C_v * A_damper * √(2 * ΔP_local / ρ)

Where:
C_v = Flow coefficient (0.6-0.8)
A_damper = Effective damper area
ΔP_local = Pressure at VAV box
ρ = Air density

Control Stability Criterion: [118]

To avoid oscillation:

t_delay ≥ 3 * τ_system

Where τ_system = System time constant (typically 2-5 minutes for VAV)

Reset Rate Limits:

|dΔP/dt| ≤ 0.1 in. H₂O / minute (to prevent hunting)

Energy Savings Calculation [113]

Baseline Power:

P_baseline = (ΔP_fixed * Q_avg) / η_total

With Reset:
 P_reset = (ΔP_reset(t) * Q(t)) / η_total

Where ΔP_reset(t) typically 40-60% of ΔP_fixed

Annual Savings:

E_saved = ∫(P_baseline - P_reset) dt over operating hours

Percent_savings = (E_baseline - E_reset) / E_baseline * 100%

Performance Metrics [119] [115] [113]

Typical ΔP reduction: From 2.0-2.5 in. H₂O to 0.6-1.2 in. H₂O
Fan energy savings: 25-50% compared to fixed setpoint
Average damper position: Maintained at 50-75% with reset
Payback period: 6 months - 2 years

6-8. TEMPERATURE RESET STRATEGIES (HHW, CHW, CW)

A. HOT WATER TEMPERATURE RESET
Outdoor Air Temperature Compensation [120] [121]
Linear Reset Schedule:

T_HHW = T_HHW_max - m * (T_OA - T_OA_design)

Where:
m = Reset slope = (T_HHW_max - T_HHW_min) / (T_OA_design - T_OA_max)

Typical Values:
T_HHW_max = 80-85°C (design day)
T_HHW_min = 60-65°C (mild day)
T_OA_design = -15°C to -20°C (location dependent)
T_OA_max = 10-15°C (heating season limit)
Example Reset Curve: [122]

If T_OA < 12°C:

T_HHW = 20 + (12-T_OA) * 4.0 // 4.0°C HHW per °C OA drop
Else:
T_HHW = 20°C (minimum)

Thermodynamic Basis: [121]

Heat loss from building:

Q_loss = U * A * (T_indoor - T_OA)

Heat delivery required:

Q_delivery = ṁ * c_p * (T_HHW_supply - T_HHW_return)

For balance: Q_loss = Q_delivery

Energy Savings Mechanism: [120] [121]

Reduced distribution losses: ΔQ_loss = U_pipe * A_pipe * (T_HHW_high - T_HHW_low)
Improved boiler efficiency: η_boiler increases with lower return temperature
Reduced standby losses: Proportional to (T_water - T_ambient)
B. CHILLED WATER TEMPERATURE RESET
Cooling Load-Based Reset [123] [124]
OAT-Based Linear Reset:

T_CHW = T_CHW_min + k * (T_OA - T_threshold)

Where:
k = Proportional gain (typically 0.2-0.4)
T_threshold = Temperature below which reset begins (typically 15-20°C)

Typical Schedule: [125]

If T_OA ≤ 16°C:
T_CHW = 12°C (maximum reset)
If 16°C < T_OA < 26.5°C:
T_CHW = 12 - (T_OA - 16) * 0.524 // Linear interpolation
If T_OA ≥ 26.5°C:
T_CHW = 6.5°C (minimum, design)

Coil Valve Position-Based Reset (Trim & Respond): [123]

Every t_interval:
Count N_valves_open = Count(valve_position > 90%)

If N_valves_open ≥ threshold_high:
T_CHW = T_CHW - δT_response // Decrease temperature

If N_valves_open ≤ threshold_low:
T_CHW = T_CHW + δT_trim // Increase temperature

Constrain: T_CHW_min ≤ T_CHW ≤ T_CHW_max

Typical Parameters: [123]

 threshold_high = 3 valves
threshold_low = 1 valve
δT_response = 1.0°C (aggressive)
δT_trim = 0.5°C (conservative)
t_interval = 10-15 minutes
Chiller Performance Impact: [123]
COP Relationship:

COP = Q_evap / W_comp

dCOP/dT_CHW ≈ -2 to -3% per °C increase in T_CHW

Mechanism: Higher evaporator pressure → Lower compression ratio → Lower work

Pump Energy Trade-off: [124]

Warmer CHW → More flow needed:

ΔQ_required = ṁ * c_p * ΔT_coil

If T_CHW increases: ṁ must increase to maintain ΔQ_required

P_pump ∝ ṁ³ (from affinity laws)

Optimization: [123]

Minimize: E_total = E_chiller(T_CHW) + E_pump(ṁ(T_CHW)) + E_reheat(T_CHW)

Typical result: T_CHW_opt increases in spring/fall, decreases in peak summer

C. CONDENSER WATER TEMPERATURE RESET

Wet Bulb-Based Control [126] [127] [112]
Fundamental Relationship:

T_CW_leaving = T_WB + Approach

Where:
T_WB = Outdoor wet bulb temperature
Approach = Cooling tower effectiveness loss (typically 3-7°C)

Optimal Approach Temperature Control (OAT): [112]

Minimize: P_total(T_CW) = P_chiller(T_CW) + P_tower_fan(T_CW)

 Optimal T_CW varies hourly based on:
- Cooling load
- Ambient wet bulb
- Tower and chiller performance curves

ASHRAE 90.1 Reset Formula: [127]

T_CW = T_WB + (10.02 - 0.24 * T_WB)

Valid range: T_WB = 10-25°C

Result: Approach decreases as wet bulb increases

Alternative Fixed Approach: [126]

T_CW_setpoint = T_WB + 7°C

Constraints:
T_CW_min ≤ T_CW_setpoint ≤ T_CW_max

Where:
T_CW_min = 12-13°C (to prevent refrigerant flow issues)
T_CW_max = 30-32°C (chiller limit)

Chiller Performance Benefit: [128] [126]

COP Improvement:

dCOP/dT_CW ≈ +0.5 to +1.5% per 1°C decrease in T_CW

Mechanism: Lower condensing temperature → Lower head pressure → Less compression work

Tower Fan Energy Cost: [129] [126]

P_fan = P_fan_design * (N/N_design)³

Where N = fan speed to achieve T_CW_setpoint

Trade-off: Lower T_CW requires higher fan speed

System-Level Optimization: [129]

E_system = E_chiller + E_tower_fans + E_CW_pumps

∂E_system/∂T_CW = 0 gives optimal T_CW

Result: T_CW_opt typically 2-5°C above wet bulb at part load

Performance Metrics (Combined HHW, CHW, CW)

 HHW reset savings: 5-15% heating energy
CHW reset savings: 8-18% chiller energy
CW reset savings: 10-25% chiller energy
System-level optimization: 15-30% total plant energy savings

9. ELECTRONIC EXPANSION VALVE (EEV)

Refrigeration Cycle Fundamentals [130] [131]
Superheat Definition:

SH = T_evap_outlet - T_sat_evap

Where:
T_evap_outlet = Measured suction line temperature
T_sat_evap = Saturation temperature at evaporator pressure

Target Superheat: [132] [133]

SH_target = f(T_evap, T_cond, T_ambient)

Typical: 3-7°C for optimal performance

EEV Control Strategies

PID Control (Traditional): [132]

u(t) = K_p * e(t) + K_i * ∫e(τ)dτ + K_d * de/dt

Where:
e(t) = SH_target - SH_measured
u(t) = Valve opening command (steps or %)

Typical Gains: [133]

K_p = 5-20 steps/°C
K_i = 0.5-2 steps/(°C·s)
K_d = 2-10 steps·s/°C
Combined Feed-Forward + Feedback Control: [130]

Valve_opening = Valve_FF + Valve_FB

Where:
Valve_FF = f(T_evap, Load_estimate) // Feed-forward
Valve_FB = PID(SH_error) // Feedback correction
Feed-Forward Component: [130]

Valve_FF = a_0 + a_1*T_evap + a_2*Q_load + a_3*T_ambient

Coefficients a_i determined through system identification

Fuzzy Logic Control: [132]

Input Variables:
SH_error = SH_target - SH_measured
dSH/dt = Rate of change of superheat
Fuzzy Rules (example):

IF SH_error is Negative_Large AND dSH/dt is Decreasing

THEN Valve_change is Close_Fast

IF SH_error is Positive_Small AND dSH/dt is Stable

THEN Valve_change is Open_Slow

Defuzzification:

Valve_opening = Σ(μ_i * output_i) / Σ(μ_i)

Where μ_i = membership function values

Dynamic Optimization for Cyclic Operation [131]

Challenge: In cycling systems (on/off compressor), evaporator is poorly utilized initially
Optimal Opening Profile: [131]

Valve_opening(t) = Valve_max - k * t for 0 ≤ t ≤ t_cycle

Where:
k = Linear reduction rate (determined experimentally)
t_cycle = Compressor on-time

Pre-filling Strategy: [131]

Before compressor starts:

Open valve to pre-charge evaporator with refrigerant

During compressor operation:

Gradually close valve following optimal profile

Evaporator Utilization: [131]

 EU(t) = (L_evap_2phase(t) / L_evap_total) * 100%

Goal: Maximize time-averaged EU during on-cycle

Performance Impact:
Traditional capillary tube: EU_avg ≈ 45%
Optimal EEV control: EU_avg ≈ 71%
Energy savings: 15-20% in cycling applications
Advanced: Model Predictive Control (MPC) [130]
System Model:

dx/dt = f(x, u, d)

Where:
x = [T_evap, T_cond, SH, m_refrig] // State vector
u = Valve_opening // Control input
d = [Q_load, T_ambient] // Disturbances

Optimization:

min Σ(t=k to k+H) [Q(x(t), u(t))]

Subject to:
SH_min ≤ SH(t) ≤ SH_max
u_min ≤ u(t) ≤ u_max
System dynamics: x(t+1) = f(x(t), u(t), d(t))

Performance Metrics [132] [130] [131]

Superheat stability: ±1°C with advanced control vs ±3-5°C with simple control
Energy efficiency gain: 10-20% compared to fixed orifice
Evaporator utilization improvement: 20-60% in cycling operation
COP improvement: 5-15%

CATEGORY 3: VENTILATION & AIRFLOW OPTIMIZATION

10. ECONOMIZER CYCLE (FREE COOLING)

Thermodynamic Principles [134] [135] [136]
Enthalpy-Based Control (Optimal):
Air Enthalpy Calculation:
 h = c_p * T + h_fg * ω

Where:
c_p = Specific heat of air ≈ 1.006 kJ/(kg·°C)
T = Dry-bulb temperature (°C)
h_fg = Latent heat of vaporization ≈ 2501 kJ/kg
ω = Humidity ratio (kg_water/kg_dry_air)

Humidity Ratio from Relative Humidity:

ω = 0.622 * (RH * P_sat) / (P_atm - RH * P_sat)

Where:
RH = Relative humidity (fraction)
P_sat = Saturation pressure at T (Pa)
P_atm = Atmospheric pressure ≈ 101325 Pa

Control Logic: [135] [136]

Calculate:
h_OA = Enthalpy of outside air
h_RA = Enthalpy of return air
h_setpoint = Target mixed air enthalpy

IF h_OA < h_RA AND T_OA > T_OA_min:

Economizer_mode = ACTIVE

IF h_OA < h_setpoint:

Mode = FULL_FREE_COOLING
Damper_OA = 100%
Damper_RA = 0%
Mechanical_cooling = OFF

ELSE: // h_setpoint ≤ h_OA < h_RA

Mode = PARTIAL_FREE_COOLING
Damper_OA = Modulate to achieve h_setpoint
Mechanical_cooling = ON (reduced)

ELSE:
Economizer_mode = INACTIVE
Damper_OA = Minimum (ventilation only)
Mechanical_cooling = ON (full capacity)

Dry-Bulb Temperature Control (Simpler): [136]

T_changeover = Design temperature (typically 18-21°C)

IF T_OA < T_RA AND T_OA > T_OA_min AND T_OA < T_changeover:
Economizer = ACTIVE
ELSE:
Economizer = INACTIVE
Damper Modulation: [137] [138]
Mixed Air Temperature Control:

T_mixed = x * T_OA + (1-x) * T_RA

Where:
x = Fraction of outdoor air (0 to 1)
x = Damper_OA_position / 100%

PID Control for Damper:

u(t) = K_p*e(t) + K_i*∫e(τ)dτ + K_d*de/dt

Where:
e(t) = T_mixed_setpoint - T_mixed_actual
u(t) = Damper position change

High-Limit Shutoff: [137]

Protect against overcooling:

IF T_mixed < T_mixed_low_limit OR T_supply < T_supply_low_limit:

Close outdoor air damper
Open return air damper
(Prevents freeze-ups)

Energy Savings Calculation [136]

Cooling Energy Without Economizer:

Q_mech = ṁ_air * c_p * (T_RA - T_supply) * hours

E_mech = Q_mech / COP_chiller

Cooling Energy With Economizer:

When T_OA allows free cooling:

E_mech = 0 (or reduced for partial)

Fan energy penalty:

E_fan_econ = P_fan_100%_OA * hours_econ
E_fan_baseline = P_fan_min_OA * hours_econ

Additional fan energy = E_fan_econ - E_fan_baseline

Net Savings:
 Savings = E_mech_avoided - E_fan_additional

Percent_savings = (Savings / E_total_baseline) * 100%

Sensor Requirements [137]

Minimum (Dry-Bulb Control):
Outdoor air temperature sensor
Return air temperature sensor
Mixed air temperature sensor
Advanced (Enthalpy Control):
All of above PLUS:
Outdoor air humidity sensor (RH or dewpoint)
Return air humidity sensor
Calibration Requirements: [137]
Temperature sensors: ±0.5°C accuracy
RH sensors: ±3-5% RH accuracy (require regular calibration)
Damper position feedback: ±5% accuracy
Performance Metrics [139] [136]
Annual hours of economizer operation: 2000-4000 hrs/yr (climate dependent)
Energy savings: 10-40% of cooling energy
Simple payback: 1-4 years
Dry-bulb vs enthalpy savings difference: 5-15% (enthalpy saves more in humid climates)

11. NIGHT PURGE / NIGHT COOLING

Thermal Mass Utilization Theory [140] [141] [142]
Building Thermal Capacity:

C_building = Σ(m_i * c_p_i)

Where:
m_i = Mass of building element i (concrete, walls, etc.)
c_p_i = Specific heat of material i

Typical: 50-200 Wh/(m²·K) for heavyweight buildings

Pre-Cooling Effect:
 Q_stored = C_building * (T_indoor_initial - T_indoor_final)

Where:
T_indoor_initial = Temperature before night purge
T_indoor_final = Temperature after night purge

Activation Logic [143] [142] [140]

Basic Control Strategy:

During unoccupied period (e.g., 22:00 - 06:00):

IF (T_OA < T_indoor) AND (RH_OA < RH_threshold) AND (T_indoor > T_target):
Night_purge = ACTIVE
Open_windows_or_dampers = TRUE
Supply_fan = ON (if mechanical)

ELSE:
Night_purge = INACTIVE

Typical Parameters: [140] [143]

RH_threshold = 70-80% (prevent moisture problems)
T_target = 22-24°C (depends on next-day setpoint)
Minimum T_OA = 15°C (avoid overcooling)
Duration Optimization: [140]
8-Hour Purge (22:00 - 06:00):

Effective for most climates

Sufficient cooling for moderate thermal mass

12-Hour Purge (18:00 - 06:00):

Benefits in hot climates (limited to specific months)

Marginal additional savings vs 8-hour

Optimal Start Time:

t_start = t_occupancy - τ_cooldown

Where:
τ_cooldown = Time to reduce T_indoor to target
τ_cooldown ≈ 2-6 hours (depends on thermal mass, ventilation rate)

Hybrid Ventilation Strategy [141]

Natural + Mechanical Combination:
Purge Time Prediction: [141]

t_purge = f(Q_mech, Q_natural, C_building, ΔT_initial)

Controlled by two ratios:

r_1 = Q_mech / Q_natural_initial
r_2 = A_floor_vent / A_ceiling_vent

Simplified Model:

dT/dt = -(Q_total / C_building) * (T_indoor - T_OA)

Where:
Q_total = Q_natural + Q_mech
Q_natural = C_d * A_eff * √(2*g*H*ΔT/T_avg) for stack effect

Solution:

T_indoor(t) = T_OA + (T_initial - T_OA) * exp(-t/τ)

τ = C_building / (ρ * c_p * Q_total)

Energy Savings Prediction [142] [144] [143]

Reduced Morning Cooling Load:

Q_morning_saved = C_building * (T_without_purge - T_with_purge)

Assuming start-up occurs at beginning of occupancy:

T_without_purge ≈ 26-28°C
T_with_purge ≈ 22-24°C

Energy_saved = Q_morning_saved / COP_AC

Peak Demand Reduction:

Peak_demand_reduction = Q_morning_saved / (t_morning * η_delivery)

Where:
t_morning = Duration of morning cool-down period
η_delivery = HVAC system delivery efficiency

Climate Dependency: [144] [140]

Effectiveness Index:
 EI = (Hours with suitable conditions / Total operating hours) * 100%

Suitable: T_OA < T_indoor AND RH_OA < threshold

Results:
Hot-dry climate: EI = 70-90% (excellent)
Hot-humid climate: EI = 30-50% (moderate)
Temperate: EI = 60-80% (good)

Fan Energy Consideration:

E_fan_night = P_fan * t_purge

Must be less than E_cooling_saved for net benefit

Typical: E_cooling_saved / E_fan_night > 3:1 ratio

Performance Metrics [143] [142] [144] [140]

Temperature reduction: 2-6°C before occupancy
Morning cooling energy savings: 15-35%
Peak cooling load reduction: 20-40%
Annual cooling energy savings: 10-25% (climate dependent)
Best for: High thermal mass buildings in dry climates

12-13. DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION (DCV)

A. CO₂-BASED DCV FOR OCCUPIED SPACES
Mass Balance Equation [145] [146]
CO₂ Generation and Removal:

V * dC/dt = N * G - Q_oa * (C_s - C_oa)

Where:
V = Zone volume (m³)
C_s = Zone CO₂ concentration (ppm)
C_oa = Outdoor CO₂ concentration (typically 400 ppm)
N = Number of occupants
G = CO₂ generation per person (L/s·person)
Q_oa = Outdoor air flow rate (L/s)

Steady-State Solution:

C_s = C_oa + (N * G) / Q_oa

Required Ventilation (ASHRAE 62.1): [146] [147]

Q_oa = (N * R_p) + (A_z * R_a)

Where:
R_p = People outdoor air rate (typically 5-10 cfm/person or 2.5-5 L/s·person)
R_a = Area outdoor air rate (typically 0.06 cfm/ft² or 0.3 L/s·m²)
A_z = Zone floor area (m²)

Maximum Allowable CO₂: [146]

From ASHRAE 62.1:

C_z = C_oa + (8400 * m * R_p) / (Q_oa/N + R_a * A_z/N * E_z)

Where:
m = Metabolic activity level (met units, typically 1.0-1.2 for office)
E_z = Zone air distribution effectiveness (typically 0.8-1.0)

Typical result: C_z = 1000-1100 ppm for office spaces

DCV Control Strategies

Proportional Control: [148]

Q_oa(t) = Q_oa_design * (C_s(t) - C_oa) / (C_z - C_oa)

Constraints:
Q_oa_min ≤ Q_oa(t) ≤ Q_oa_design

Linear Reset: [146]

Q_oa = Q_oa_min + (Q_oa_design - Q_oa_min) * (C_s - C_oa) / (C_z - C_oa)

Where:
Q_oa_min = Area-based ventilation (for unoccupied)
Q_oa_design = Maximum design flow

PID Control with CO₂ Feedback: [148]

u(t) = K_p * e(t) + K_i * ∫e(τ)dτ + K_d * de/dt

Where:
e(t) = C_setpoint - C_measured
u(t) = Damper position (or fan speed)

Typical gains:
K_p = 0.5-2% damper per 10 ppm CO₂
 K_i = 0.1-0.5% damper per (10 ppm·min)
K_d = 1-5% damper·min per 10 ppm

Dual-Setpoint Control: [148]

IF C_s < C_lower:

Q_oa = Q_oa_min // Maintain minimum ventilation

IF C_lower ≤ C_s ≤ C_upper:

Q_oa = Proportional control // Modulate based on CO₂

IF C_s > C_upper:

Q_oa = Q_oa_max // Maximum ventilation

Typical: C_lower = 800 ppm, C_upper = 1100 ppm

Multi-Zone DCV Coordination [149] [146]

Critical Zone Method:

For AHU serving multiple zones:

Q_oa_AHU = max(Q_oa_zone_1, Q_oa_zone_2, ..., Q_oa_zone_n)

OR weighted by zone supply flow:

Q_oa_AHU = Σ(Q_oa_zone_i * Q_supply_zone_i) / Q_supply_total

Zone-Level Implementation:

Each VAV box adjusts its minimum flow based on zone CO₂:

Q_min_zone = Q_min_design * (C_zone - C_oa) / (C_z - C_oa)

B. CO-BASED DCV FOR PARKING GARAGES

CO Generation and Control [145] [146]
Mass Balance:

V * dC_CO/dt = E_vehicles - Q * C_CO

Where:
C_CO = CO concentration (ppm)
E_vehicles = CO emission rate from vehicles (L/s at 1 ppm)
Q = Ventilation rate (L/s)

Steady-State:
 C_CO = E_vehicles / Q

Target: C_CO ≤ 35 ppm (ASHRAE 62.1)

Control Strategy: [146]

IF C_CO < 15 ppm:

Q_exhaust = 0.3 * Q_design // Minimum ventilation

IF 15 ≤ C_CO < 25 ppm:

Q_exhaust = 0.5 * Q_design // Medium ventilation

IF 25 ≤ C_CO < 35 ppm:

Q_exhaust = Q_design // Full ventilation

IF C_CO ≥ 35 ppm:
Alarm + Emergency ventilation

Sensor Placement: [146]

Density = 1 sensor per 500-1000 m² floor area

Locations: Near vehicle exhaust concentrations (ramps, exits)
Height: 1.5-2.0 m above floor (CO is lighter than air initially but mixes)

Energy Savings Calculations

Baseline (Constant Ventilation):

E_baseline = P_fan * hours_operation

Where:
P_fan = Fan power at design flow (kW)
hours_operation = Annual operating hours

With DCV: [148] [146]

E_DCV = ∫P_fan(Q(t)/Q_design)³ dt

Average flow reduction: 30-60% in occupied spaces, 70-90% in parking

Energy_saved = E_baseline - E_DCV

Percent_savings = (Energy_saved / E_baseline) * 100%

Sensor Maintenance: [150]

Calibration Requirements:

CO₂ sensors: Every 6-12 months (±50 ppm drift acceptable)

CO sensors: Every 3-6 months (±5 ppm drift acceptable)
 Calibration methods:
- Zero calibration (outdoor air ≈ 400 ppm CO₂)
- Span calibration (1000-2000 ppm calibration gas)

Performance Metrics [147] [149] [148] [146]

CO₂-DCV in offices: 20-40% ventilation energy savings
CO-DCV in parking: 50-80% ventilation fan energy savings
Sensor cost: $200-500 per CO₂ sensor, $150-300 per CO sensor
Payback period: 1-3 years (depending on occupancy variability)
Acceptable CO₂ range: 400-1100 ppm
Acceptable CO range: 0-35 ppm

CATEGORY 4: VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES (VSD) OPTIMIZATION

14. SECONDARY CHW PUMP DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RESET

Pump System Fundamentals [151] [152] [153]
Pump Power Equation:

P_pump = (ΔP * Q) / (η_pump * η_motor * η_VFD)

Where:
ΔP = Differential pressure across pump (Pa or psi)
Q = Flow rate (m³/s or GPM)
η_pump = Pump efficiency (0.70-0.85)
η_motor = Motor efficiency (0.90-0.95)
η_VFD = VFD efficiency (0.95-0.98)

Pump Affinity Laws: [153]

Q₂/Q₁ = (N₂/N₁)
ΔP₂/ΔP₁ = (N₂/N₁)²
P₂/P₁ = (N₂/N₁)³

Where N = pump speed (RPM or Hz)

Critical Insight: Reducing speed by 20% → 50% power reduction

System Curve:

ΔP_system = K * Q²
 Where K = system resistance coefficient

DP Reset Control Strategies

Valve Position-Based Reset: [152] [151]

Monitor: Chilled water valve positions at all AHUs

Every t_sample:
Identify: valve_max = max(valve_1, valve_2, ..., valve_n)

IF valve_max ≥ threshold_high (e.g., 95%):

Stage UP: ΔP_setpoint += increment

IF valve_max ≤ threshold_low (e.g., 85%):

Stage DOWN: ΔP_setpoint -= increment

Constrain: ΔP_min ≤ ΔP_setpoint ≤ ΔP_max

Typical Parameters: [154]

threshold_high = 90-95% valve opening
threshold_low = 80-85% valve opening
increment = 1-2 psi (7-14 kPa)
t_sample = 5-10 minutes
ΔP_min = 15-20 psi (based on most remote coil)
ΔP_max = Design DP (40-60 psi typical)
Building DP-Based Reset: [151]

Measure: ΔP_building = P_supply - P_return at critical location

IF ΔP_building < (ΔP_building_setpoint - deadband):

ΔP_pump_setpoint += increment_up

IF ΔP_building > (ΔP_building_setpoint + deadband):

ΔP_pump_setpoint -= increment_down

Where:
deadband = typically 2 psi (14 kPa)
increment_up = 3 psi (more aggressive)
increment_down = 2 psi (more conservative)

Statistical Algorithm for Valve Positions: [151]

Monitor n valve positions (typically n ≥ 4)

Calculate:
valve_mean = mean(valve_1, ..., valve_n)
 valve_std = std_dev(valve_1, ..., valve_n)

Decision logic:
IF valve_mean > 85% AND valve_std < 10%:
ΔP_setpoint += increment // All valves demanding flow

IF valve_mean < 70% AND valve_std < 15%:

ΔP_setpoint -= increment // System overcooled

ELSE:
Hold ΔP_setpoint // Mixed conditions

Optimization Formulation [155] [153]

Problem Statement:

Minimize: P_pump = (ΔP * Q) / η_total

Subject to:
ΔP_min ≤ ΔP ≤ ΔP_max // Pump operating limits
Q_i_required ≤ Q_i_delivered for all coils i // Flow satisfaction
ΔP_coil_i ≥ ΔP_coil_min for all coils i // Minimum coil DP

Optimal DP Setpoint: [155]

For most unfavorable loop:

ΔP_pump_opt = ΔP_friction_piping + ΔP_coil_min + margin

Where:
margin = 2-5 psi (safety factor)

ΔP_friction_piping = f(Q, pipe_roughness, length)

Energy Savings Analysis [153]

Baseline (Fixed DP):

P_baseline = (ΔP_fixed * Q_avg) / η_total

Typical: ΔP_fixed = 40-60 psi (275-415 kPa)

With DP Reset:

P_reset = (ΔP_reset(t) * Q(t)) / η_total

Average ΔP_reset ≈ 40-60% of ΔP_fixed

Annual savings:
E_saved = ∫(P_baseline - P_reset) * hours_operation
 Percent_savings = (E_saved / E_baseline) * 100%

Typical Savings Profile: [154]

100% load: ΔP_reset ≈ 80-90% of ΔP_fixed → 30-40% power savings

75% load: ΔP_reset ≈ 60-70% of ΔP_fixed → 40-50% power savings
50% load: ΔP_reset ≈ 45-55% of ΔP_fixed → 50-60% power savings

Implementation Considerations [156] [151]

Primary-Only vs Primary-Secondary Systems:
Primary-Only (Variable Primary Flow): [151]

Direct DP control at AHUs

Bypass valve for minimum chiller flow
DP sensor at most remote coil or 2/3 distance

Primary-Secondary: [156]

Secondary pumps controlled independently

DP measured across secondary loop
Primary flow matches chiller requirements

Control Stability: [153]

Rate Limiting:

|dΔP/dt| ≤ rate_limit

Typical: rate_limit = 1-2 psi/minute

Prevents oscillation and hunting

Time Delays:

t_response = 3-5 minutes between DP adjustments

Allows system to stabilize before next change

Minimum Flow Protection:

IF Q_total < Q_chiller_min:

Open bypass valve
Maintain minimum flow through chiller
Performance Metrics [154] [156] [153] [151]
Typical DP reduction: From 40-60 psi to 20-35 psi average
Pump energy savings: 30-50% compared to fixed DP
Average valve position: Maintained at 80-90% with reset
Payback period: 1-3 years
VFD efficiency: Typically 95-98%

15-16. VARIABLE HEAD PRESSURE CONTROL

Refrigeration System Fundamentals [157] [158] [159]
Head Pressure Definition:

P_head = P_discharge_compressor ≈ P_saturation_condensing

Related to condensing temperature:

T_cond = f(P_head, refrigerant_properties)

Compressor Power:

W_comp = ṁ_refrig * (h_discharge - h_suction) / η_comp

Where:
ṁ_refrig = Refrigerant mass flow rate
h_discharge, h_suction = Enthalpy at discharge and suction
η_comp = Compressor isentropic efficiency

COP Relationship:

COP = Q_evap / W_comp

dCOP/dT_cond ≈ -1.5% to -2.5% per 1°C increase in T_cond

Lower head pressure → Lower T_cond → Higher COP

Condenser Performance [158]

Heat Rejection:

Q_cond = U * A * LMTD

Where:
U = Overall heat transfer coefficient
A = Heat transfer area
LMTD = Log mean temperature difference
For evaporative condensers:

T_cond_approach = T_cond - T_wb_ambient

Q_cond = K * ṁ_air * (h_air_out - h_air_in)

Fan Power:

P_fan = P_fan_design * (speed/speed_design)³

Affinity law for fans

Variable Head Pressure Control Algorithms

Ambient-Based Control: [157]

T_cond_setpoint = T_wb + approach + offset

Where:
T_wb = Ambient wet bulb temperature
approach = 3-5°C (condenser effectiveness)
offset = 0-3°C (optimization variable)

Then:
P_head_setpoint = P_sat(T_cond_setpoint, refrigerant)

Optimization: [160] [157]

Minimize: E_total = E_compressor(P_head) + E_fan(P_head)

E_compressor increases with P_head (higher lift)

E_fan decreases with P_head (less cooling needed)

Optimal P_head = balance point

VFD Control for Condenser Fans: [161] [158]

PID control:
u(t) = K_p * e(t) + K_i * ∫e(τ)dτ + K_d * de/dt

Where:
e(t) = P_head_setpoint - P_head_measured
u(t) = Fan speed command (Hz or %)

Gains:
K_p = 2-5 Hz per bar (or 0.5-1% per psi)
K_i = 0.1-0.5 Hz per (bar·s)
K_d = 5-15 Hz·s per bar
Floating Head Pressure Strategy: [157]

Basic logic:
Set P_head_setpoint as low as possible while maintaining:
- Minimum compression ratio (typically ≥ 2.0)
- Adequate subcooling (typically 3-7°C)
- Proper oil return to compressor
- Expansion valve operation range

P_head_setpoint = max(P_head_min, P_head_calculated)

Where:
P_head_min = f(P_evap, compression_ratio_min)
P_head_calculated = f(T_wb, load, setpoint)

Variable Inter-Stage Pressure Control [157]

For two-stage refrigeration systems:
Optimal Inter-Stage Pressure:

P_inter_opt = √(P_evap * P_cond)

This minimizes total compression work for two stages

Control Implementation:

Adjust suction pressure regulator or economizer to maintain:

P_inter = k * √(P_evap * P_head)

Where k = 0.9-1.1 (adjustment factor)

Must coordinate with head pressure control

Energy Savings Calculations [160] [157]

Fixed Head Pressure Baseline:

P_head_fixed = P_sat(T_cond_design)

Typical: T_cond_design = 40-45°C → P_head = 15-18 bar (R-404A)

With Variable Head Pressure:

P_head_variable(t) = f(T_wb(t), load(t))

Average reduction: 20-30% lower pressure during part-load

COP improvement:
 ΔCOP = COP_variable - COP_fixed
≈ 10-25% during part-load conditions

Component-Level Savings: [157]

Compressor Savings:

E_comp_saved = ∫ΔW_comp dt

ΔW_comp ∝ (P_head_fixed - P_head_variable)

Typical: 15-25% compressor energy savings

Fan Energy Increase:

E_fan_increase = ∫(P_fan_variable - P_fan_fixed) dt

But E_fan << E_comp, so net savings significant

Net System Savings:

Savings_net = E_comp_saved - E_fan_increase

Typical: 12-20% total refrigeration system energy savings

Implementation Considerations [162] [157]

Minimum Head Pressure Limits:
Compression Ratio Limit:

CR_min = P_head / P_evap ≥ 2.0 (typical)

P_head_min = CR_min * P_evap

Expansion Valve Operation:

ΔP_EEV = P_head - P_evap must be sufficient

P_head_min based on valve capacity at minimum ΔP

Oil Return:

Velocity in suction line must be adequate for oil return

Minimum P_head may be limited by refrigerant velocity requirements

Hot Gas Defrost Accommodation: [157]

During defrost cycle:

Override floating head pressure
Set P_head = P_head_defrost (higher value)

Return to optimized control after defrost

Performance Metrics [159] [158] [160] [157]

Head pressure reduction: 20-40% at part load
Compressor energy savings: 15-25%
Overall system savings: 12-20%
COP improvement: 10-25% at favorable ambient conditions
Payback period: 1-3 years
Best for: Systems with significant part-load operation

CROSS-CUTTING THEMES & IMPLEMENTATION

System-Level Integration
Coordinated Control: [163] [164] [109]
Multiple strategies must be coordinated to avoid conflicts:

Priority hierarchy:
1. Safety limits (freeze protection, equipment limits)
2. Comfort requirements (temperature, humidity, CO₂)
3. Energy optimization (reset schedules, staging)

Example: SAT Reset + DSPR Coordination:

If SAT increases:
- Airflow increases (VAV dampers open more)
- Static pressure demand increases
- DSPR algorithm responds by raising ΔP_setpoint

Net effect: Reheat ↓, Fan power ↑

Optimization finds balance

Model Predictive Control (MPC) [165] [94] [163] [109]
General MPC Framework:

At each time step k:

1. Predict future states over horizon H:

x(k+1|k), x(k+2|k), ..., x(k+H|k)

2. Solve optimization:
min Σ(t=k to k+H) [L(x(t), u(t))]

Subject to:
- System dynamics: x(t+1) = f(x(t), u(t), d(t))
- Constraints: x_min ≤ x(t) ≤ x_max
u_min ≤ u(t) ≤ u_max

3. Implement u(k)

4. Measure x(k+1), update predictions, repeat

Weather Forecast Integration:

d_forecast = [T_OA_forecast, T_WB_forecast, Q_solar_forecast]

Use in MDP or MPC to anticipate loads and pre-optimize

Machine Learning Enhancement [166] [163]

Reinforcement Learning for HVAC: [94]

State: s = [T_outdoor, T_indoor, occupancy, time, ...]

Action: a = [T_setpoint, SAT, chiller_staging, ...]
Reward: r = -cost(energy) - penalty(discomfort)

Policy: π(a|s) learned through experience

Performance: Can achieve 5-15% additional savings beyond model-based methods

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Energy Metrics:

EUI = Annual_Energy / Floor_Area (kWh/m²/year)

Normalized savings = (Baseline_EUI - Optimized_EUI) / Baseline_EUI * 100%

Comfort Metrics:
 Thermal comfort: % hours with PMV ∈ [-0.5, 0.5]

IAQ: % hours with CO₂ < 1000 ppm

Reliability Metrics:

Equipment runtime hours

Fault detection rate
Control stability (variance in controlled variables)

SUMMARY OF ENERGY SAVINGS POTENTIAL

Strategy Category Typical Savings Notes

Optimal Start/Stop Supervisory 10-20% total High thermal mass buildings

Setpoint Optimization Supervisory 5-10% per °C With dead band: +10-30%

Master SAT Signal Supervisory 10-25% total Reduces reheat

Chiller Staging Plant 5-15% chiller Load distribution + sequencing

DSPR Plant 25-50% fan VAV systems only

HHW Reset Plant 5-15% heating Outdoor compensation

CHW Reset Plant 8-18% chiller Coil valve-based optimal

CW Reset Plant 10-25% chiller Wet bulb tracking

EEV Control Plant 10-20% AC vs fixed orifice

Economizer Ventilation 10-40% cooling Climate dependent

Night Purge Ventilation 10-25% cooling High mass, dry climate

CO₂ DCV Ventilation 20-40% vent fan Variable occupancy

CO DCV Ventilation 50-80% vent fan Parking garages

CHW Pump DP Reset VSD 30-50% pump Secondary pumps

Variable Head Press. VSD 12-20% refrig Part-load operation

Combined Implementation: Properly integrated strategies can achieve 30-60% total HVAC
energy savings

This comprehensive technical document provides PhD-level detail on equations, models,

algorithms, performance metrics, and implementation considerations for each HVAC optimization
strategy. The research synthesizes information from over 160 technical sources including peer-
reviewed journals, conference proceedings, standards, and industry guidelines.
⁂
Comprehensive Visual/Infographic Design Brief for HVAC Optimization Strategies

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Create a premium, sophisticated, and tech-forward infographic that comprehensively
showcases all 16 HVAC optimization solutions (excluding Category 5) organized within their 4
core methodology categories. The visual must balance technical depth with aesthetic elegance,
conveying complex engineering concepts through intelligent visual hierarchy and minimalist
design principles rather than text-heavy explanations.
Target Context: Executive presentation for IGIS Management (C-suite, engineering directors,
facility managers) to demonstrate comprehensive solution portfolio and engineering expertise.

DESIGN FOUNDATION
Canvas & Background
Dimensions: Horizontal landscape format (3:2 aspect ratio, optimized for 1920×1280px or
adaptable)
Background: Pure white (#FFFFFF) with subtle depth using 1-2% gradient overlay or
strategically placed shadows for dimensionality
Safe margins: 60px on all sides to maintain professional breathing room
Overall aesthetic: Contemporary technology sector (Apple, Tesla, Siemens design
language) meets sophisticated engineering visualization

VISUAL HIERARCHY & LAYOUT STRUCTURE

Top Section (Title/Header Area)
Main title: "HVAC Energy Optimization Solutions Portfolio" in modern sans-serif (e.g., Inter,
Montserrat, or Poppins)
Subtitle: Position statement like "16 Integrated Strategies Across 4 Core Competency
Areas"
Visual accent: Minimalist horizontal line or geometric accent bar in accent color (suggest:
deep teal/charcoal #1B4965 or professional blue #2C3E7F)
Typography scale: Title 48-54px, subtitle 20-24px, generous leading
Main Content Area (Central Hub)
Implement a circular/radial system OR modular grid system that organizes the 4 categories as
primary clusters:
Option A: Radial Sunburst Architecture (Recommended for visual impact)
Position 4 category "petals" radiating from center
 Each petal contains 3-4 strategy nodes
Center hub features a small icon or metric (e.g., "30-60% Energy Savings Potential")
Creates organic, sophisticated flow that feels engineered yet elegant
Option B: Modular 2×2 Grid System (Alternative)
4 quadrants, each representing one category
Consistent card-based design with subtle shadows
Horizontal flow reading left→right, top→bottom

CATEGORY VISUAL DIFFERENTIATION

Assign distinct visual identities to each category using color psychology, icons, and subtle
design language:
Category 1: System Supervisory Control
Color scheme: Gradient from deep navy (#1B4965) to electric blue (#00A8E8)
Visual metaphor: Concentric circles, nested layers, orchestration concepts, command
center aesthetic
Icon style: Layered geometric shapes, connected nodes, central control symbol
Contains: Strategies 1-4 (Optimal Start/Stop, Setpoint Optimization, Master SAT, Chiller
Staging)
Category 2: Plant Control Parameters
Color scheme: Deep teal (#117A65) to emerald green (#27AE60)
Visual metaphor: Flowing systems, precision tuning, thermodynamic equilibrium
Icon style: Gear-like shapes, temperature curves, dynamic equilibrium symbols
Contains: Strategies 5-9 (DSPR, HHW Reset, CHW Reset, CW Reset, EEV)
Category 3: Ventilation & Airflow
Color scheme: Warm amber/gold (#E67E22) to orange (#F39C12)
Visual metaphor: Air flow patterns, circulation, breath/pulse concept, kinetic energy
Icon style: Air stream vectors, circulation arrows, particle motion
Contains: Strategies 10-13 (Economizer, Night Purge, CO₂ DCV, CO DCV)
Category 4: Variable Speed Based (VSD)
Color scheme: Deep purple (#6C3483) to vibrant magenta (#9B59B6)
Visual metaphor: Speed/velocity, scalability, dynamic adaptation, efficiency curves
Icon style: Speed meters, variable height bars, responsive motion indicators
Contains: Strategies 14-16 (CHW Pump DP Reset, VFD Condenser - Air, VFD Condenser -
Water)
STRATEGY NODE DESIGN
Each of the 16 strategies should be represented as a compact, scannable "module" with
layered information hierarchy:
Visual Structure Per Strategy Node (4 layers of information, minimal text):
Layer 1: Strategy Number & Icon
Positioned top-left/top-center of node
Large, recognizable icon (25-40px) that conveys the strategy visually
Strategy number (e.g., "1", "5", "12") in small elegant font
Example icons:
Strategy 1 (Optimal Start/Stop): Sunrise/sunrise curve + clock
Strategy 5 (DSPR): Pressure gauge with dynamic arrows
Strategy 10 (Economizer): Outdoor air symbol + checkmark
Strategy 14 (CHW Pump DP Reset): Pump with variable speed indicator
Layer 2: Strategy Name
Single line, 11-13px, bold sans-serif in category color
Example: "Optimal Start/Stop" or "DSPR"
Positioned below icon
Layer 3: Energy Savings Badge
Positioned right side of node
Capsule-shaped container with category accent color at 85% opacity
Text: "↑15%" or "↑30% AHU" (percentage savings) in white, 10px bold
Creates immediate visual scanning of impact
Layer 4: Micro-Visualization (Optional but Recommended)
Bottom of node: 1-2 small iconographic illustrations (15-20px) representing key mechanism
Example for Strategy 2 (Setpoint Optimization):
Thermometer icon + comfort zone indicator
No text, pure visual representation
Example for Strategy 7 (CHW Reset):
Temperature curve vector showing reset schedule
Outdoor temp influence indicator
Node styling:
Subtle drop shadow (0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.08))
 Border: Thin 1-2px line in category color at 40% opacity (except Category 1 which uses full
opacity)
Corner radius: 8-12px for modern feel
Hover state: Subtle lift effect, border opacity to 100%, shadow deepens (0 4px 12px
rgba(0,0,0,0.12))
Background: White with category color overlay at 3-5% opacity
Node dimensions: Compact square or rectangular (100×100px or 120×100px) to fit multiple per
quadrant/petal

INTER-CATEGORY CONNECTIONS & FLOW

Visual connectors linking strategies:
Subtle dotted or dashed lines connecting related strategies (e.g., SAT Reset connects to
DSPR)
Connection lines use category color at 30-40% opacity
Width: 1-2px (minimal, don't overpower)
Optional: Animatable arrows showing information/energy flow (only if digital version)
Cross-category synergies:
Small annotation icons (small plus sign or link symbol) positioned at intersection points
Hover text or legend explaining why strategies work together (e.g., "Optimal start/stop +
setpoint optimization = 30% synergy bonus")

INFORMATION HIERARCHY & LEGEND

Bottom Section (Key Metrics & Legend)
Three-column layout:
Column 1: Energy Savings Scale
Horizontal gradient bar showing range: 5% → 80%
Color gradient: Light gray → category colors → dark accent
Tick marks at 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%
Text: "Annual Energy Savings Range" in 10px sans-serif
Column 2: Impact Matrix (Optional advanced version)
Small 4×4 grid showing:
Rows: Implementation complexity (Easy to Hard)
Columns: Implementation cost (Low to High)
Quadrants color-coded
 Each strategy plotted as small dot/circle in grid
Size of dot = energy savings magnitude
Provides strategic planning insight
Column 3: Implementation Timeline
Simplified horizontal Gantt-style visualization
Show typical timeline from discovery → design → commissioning
Color-coded by phase:
Phase 1 (Months 0-2): Data collection & analysis
Phase 2 (Months 2-4): Design & optimization
Phase 3 (Months 4-6+): Deployment & tuning
Indicate which strategies fall into quick-win vs long-term categories

ADVANCED DESIGN ELEMENTS

Center "Hub" Innovation
Position a central statement emphasizing competitive advantage:
Option 1: Energy Impact Callout
Large bold number: "30-60%"
Subtitle: "Potential HVAC Energy Reduction"
Smaller text: "Through Integrated Category Approach"
Surrounded by subtle circular design element suggesting 360° optimization
Option 2: Capability Statement
"16 Integrated Strategies"
"4 Core Competency Areas"
"1 Unified Control Platform"
Visually arranged as concentric circles or nested percentages
Visual Connectivity Threads
Rather than straight lines, consider:
Flowing gradient lines with subtle color transitions between categories
Particle/node network aesthetic with small dots along connection paths
Wave patterns representing energy flow and optimization
Opacity variations creating depth perception
Typography as Design Element
 Use strategic typography sizing/weights to guide eye through information
Category labels in 24-28px bold
Strategy names in 12-14px semi-bold
Metrics/data in 10-11px regular
Create visual rhythm through typographic hierarchy

COLOR PALETTE SPECIFICATIONS

Primary Category Colors (with hex codes):

Category Primary Secondary Accent Text

Supervisory #1B4965 #00A8E8 #0D2D47 #FFFFFF

Plant Params #117A65 #27AE60 #0A4F3D #FFFFFF

Ventilation #E67E22 #F39C12 #C86E0A #FFFFFF

Variable Speed #6C3483 #9B59B6 #512E65 #FFFFFF

Accent & Neutral Colors:

Highlight/positive: #27AE60 (green, for energy savings)
Neutral text: #2C3E50 (dark gray-blue)
Light dividers: #ECF0F1 (light gray)
Critical/warning: #E74C3C (if needed for caveats)

INFORMATION DENSITY OPTIMIZATION

What NOT to include (keep visual, not textual):
Long explanatory paragraphs
Complex mathematical equations
Detailed technical specifications (save for slide notes)
Color-coding legend that requires memorization
What TO include (visual + minimal text):
Numbers & percentages (energy savings)
Strategy name (brevity)
Category indicators (color & position)
Icons & symbols (self-explanatory concepts)
Strategic callouts (key insights)
Scanability: An executive should understand the full portfolio in 15-20 seconds of rapid visual
scanning
DIMENSIONAL & SPACING SPECIFICATIONS
Grid system: Base 8px grid for consistency
Primary margins: 60px
Inter-category spacing: 40-50px
Strategy node spacing: 20px
Internal node padding: 12-16px
Typography baseline grid: 4px increments
Ensures vertical rhythm and professional appearance

VISUAL SOPHISTICATION TECHNIQUES

Layering & Depth:
Use subtle shadows (blur 4-12px, spread 0-2px, opacity 6-12%)
Slight transparency overlays (3-8%) for depth without opacity
Foreground-to-background stratification through color intensity
Geometric Design Language:
Incorporate subtle geometric patterns (hexagons, circles, grids) at low opacity (2-4%)
Use as background texture/subtle decoration, not primary focus
Creates tech-forward aesthetic without overwhelming
Micro-interactions (if digital):
Strategy nodes gently lift on hover
Connecting lines pulse subtly
Savings percentages increment animation (35% → 38%)
Smooth fade-in for information on scroll/reveal
White Space Strategy:
Abundant breathing room between categories
Don't fill every pixel - negative space is design
Asymmetrical but balanced composition
Creates premium, confident visual impression
REFERENCE DESIGN INSPIRATION
Target the visual sophistication level of:
Siemens Building Technologies infographics (technical, clean, data-forward)
McKinsey & Company consulting visualizations (minimalist, high-impact)
Tesla/Apple presentation decks (elegant, purposeful design)
Autodesk/Esri technical infographics (sophisticated, layered information)
Think: "What would a world-class design firm create if given unlimited time and budget, but
constraints to keep it within a single A4/presentation slide?"

DELIVERABLES SPECIFICATION
File format: PNG or SVG (vectorized)
Dimensions:
Primary: 1920×1280px (3:2 landscape ratio)
Alternatively: 1600×1067px or 2560×1707px for high-resolution use
Color mode: RGB (for screen presentation)
Accessibility:
Sufficient contrast ratios (WCAG AA minimum)
Color not sole differentiator (use icons/labels too)
Readable at 100% and 150% zoom levels
File naming convention: "HVAC_Optimization_Portfolio_Infographic_vFinal"

QUALITY CHECKLIST FOR FINAL VISUAL

Before presenting to IGIS Management, ensure:
✓ All 16 strategies clearly visible and organized
✓ 4 category color systems consistently applied
✓ Energy savings metrics prominently displayed
✓ Visual hierarchy guides eye logically through content
✓ Text is minimal but complete (names, numbers, labels)
✓ Icons are distinctive and memorable
✓ No cluttered areas; abundant white space
✓ Professional, tech-forward aesthetic (not cartoonish)
✓ Print/display ready (clean edges, proper resolution)
✓ Accessible to color-blind viewers (not relying solely on color)
✓ Immediately recognizable as premium/professional quality
This brief provides the design agency with comprehensive direction to create a visually
stunning, information-dense infographic that positions your HVAC optimization portfolio as
sophisticated, comprehensive, and impactful—perfect for impressing IGIS Management's
leadership team.

1. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/WEF_GITR_Full_Report.pdf
2. https://bcrti.co.in/digitallibrary/includeFolder/noticeFolder/211111032202117.pdf
3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6959452/
4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2387020624003383
5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9237132/
6. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0078519
7. https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/site/content/research/foundation/2024/harnessinggenerativeai_1.pdf
8. https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.E22-07-0261
9. https://peerj.com/articles/13745/
10. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3727983
11. I-am-your-optimisation-guide-HVAC-systems.pdf
12. https://www.merl.com/publications/docs/TR2013-050.pdf
13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X24010864
14. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014362448500600304
15. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.13304.pdf
16. https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/evaluating_the_performance_of_hvac_optimal_control_
0.pdf
17. https://unmethours.com/question/8023/openstudio-measure-for-hvac-optimum-startstop/
18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261923000144
19. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/ychen/files/optimal_control_of_hvac_and_window_systems_for_natural_
ventilation_through_reinforcement_learning.pdf
20. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1922605
21. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143624409359979
22. https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1049/gtd2.70004
23. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-c20394cce573e9828b8eabe4a9e4fbec/pdf/GOVP
UB-C13-c20394cce573e9828b8eabe4a9e4fbec.pdf
24. https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/airbase_5337.pdf
25. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1261&context=ihpbc
26. https://airah.org.au/Common/Uploaded files/Resources/SkillsWorkshop/sw084.pdf
27. https://www.ibpsa.us/how-do-you-model-buildings-that-use-adaptive-thermal-comfort-strategies/
28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778823006369
29. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2c58r8qm/qt2c58r8qm_noSplash_6324f8600706ac144c56e03622c
dd79f.pdf
30. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2048t8nn/qt2048t8nn_noSplash_d5ec27553bad51516d99b2b25baa7
bfe.pdf
31. https://www.simscale.com/blog/what-is-pmv-ppd/
32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261915016888
33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013232400489X
34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710223016431
35. https://www.manuscriptlink.com/society/kics/media?key=kics%2Fconference%2Ficaiic2025%2Fpresent
ation%2F1571100399.pdf
36. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v165y2016icp930-942.html
37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778823001317
38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710224018540
39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959152416301238
40. https://comfort.cbe.berkeley.edu
41. https://climate.sustainability-directory.com/term/pmv-ppd-model/
42. https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/HVAC_Controls_Webinar_Presentation_Slides.
pdf
43. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/416021372/document_2025.pdf
44. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jrse/article/17/3/035102/3349833/Holistic-optimization-of-air-conditioning-syst
em
45. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00840.pdf
46. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09613218.2023.2256430
47. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4281217.pdf
48. https://uat-pnp.nycenergytools.com/documents/soos/supply-air-temperature-reset/
49. https://thescipub.com/abstract/erjsp.2022.1.9
50. https://sid.siemens.com/api/khub/documents/0KyAAOcJ6dmTmNAtWI1Dsg/content
51. https://mepacademy.com/supply-air-temperature-reset/
52. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB2439.pdf
53. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2015/papers/bs2015_2167.pdf
54. https://escholarship.org/content/qt1fk2m3v6/qt1fk2m3v6.pdf
55. https://www.aivc.org/resource/optimisation-supply-air-temperature-control-vav-systems-temperate-a
ustralia
56. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/demystifying-modern-optimal-start-algorithms-hvac-systems-bartling-
imgic
57. https://docs.johnsoncontrols.com/bas/r/Metasys/en-US/Controller-Tool-Help/17.0/VAV-Applications/VAV-
Single-Duct-Applications/VAV-Single-Duct-Control-Logic-Selection/Box-Reheat-Coil-Control-VAV-SD/Di
scharge-Air-Reset-by-Zone-Control-VAV-SD
58. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PRhi2FMPxQ
59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22007481
60. https://23126496.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/23126496/G039840-VCCX2-T.pdf
61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324009715
62. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997Ene....22..601K/abstract
63. https://docs.johnsoncontrols.com/bas/r/Metasys/en-US/Controller-Tool-Help/14.0/VAV-Applications/VAV-
Single-Duct-Applications/VAV-Single-Duct-Control-Logic-Selection/Box-Reheat-Coil-Control-VAV-SD/H
eating-Flow-Reset-VAV-SD
64. https://pure.korea.ac.kr/en/publications/ahu-discharge-air-temperature-reset-strategy-according-to-o
utdoor
65. https://www.shareddocs.com/hvac/docs/1009/Public/03/48-50LCB-7-26-01T.pdf
66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778812001016
67. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstreams/a94a93be-2f24-4fed-a0a8-6342df3dfacb/download
68. https://vectorcontrols.com/application/files/8015/3312/7095/70-00-0336_TCX2-40863-BAC_V1-2.pdf
69. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2015/papers/bs2015_2166.pdf
70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778824011538
71. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10135128/3/Wei_Optimal Chiller loading in dual-temperature chiller
plant.pdf
72. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy25osti/94684.pdf
73. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147134102.pdf
74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720722000091
75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778816309495
76. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bso/2020/papers/bso2020_Jia.pdf
77. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/304616948.pdf
78. https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2011/EECS-2011-12.pdf
79. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23744731.2024.2404814?src=
80. https://research.monash.edu/files/296918041/296916681_oa.pdf
81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778823000658
82. https://www.ashrae.org/file library/technical resources/standards and guidelines/standards
addenda/g36_2018_x_20210709.pdf
83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261924015150
84. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2015/306401
85. https://www.trane.com/content/dam/Trane/Commercial/global/learning-center/engineers-newsletters/A
PP-PRC006A-EN_02252021.pdf
86. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5276131/
87. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7f8c/814bd16a3f153280c12aa5e2d1d7ea92ebf2.pdf
88. https://www.csemag.com/when-to-use-cooling-plant-optimization-controllers/
89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359431124019240
90. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3137133.3141452
91. https://iris.polito.it/retrieve/4e97dba8-d973-4197-b92b-b4641caa2cd0/PhD_Thesis_Brandi.pdf
92. https://www.merl.com/publications/docs/TR2013-050.pdf
93. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-c20394cce573e9828b8eabe4a9e4fbec/pdf/GOVP
UB-C13-c20394cce573e9828b8eabe4a9e4fbec.pdf
94. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00840.pdf
95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359431124019240
 96. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1261&context=ihpbc
97. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2c58r8qm/qt2c58r8qm_noSplash_6324f8600706ac144c56e03622c
dd79f.pdf
98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261915016888
99. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959152416301238
100. https://www.ibpsa.us/how-do-you-model-buildings-that-use-adaptive-thermal-comfort-strategies/
101. https://escholarship.org/content/qt2048t8nn/qt2048t8nn_noSplash_d5ec27553bad51516d99b2b25baa7
bfe.pdf
102. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4281217.pdf
103. https://uat-pnp.nycenergytools.com/documents/soos/supply-air-temperature-reset/
104. https://mepacademy.com/supply-air-temperature-reset/
105. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2015/papers/bs2015_2167.pdf
106. https://docs.johnsoncontrols.com/bas/r/Metasys/en-US/Controller-Tool-Help/17.0/VAV-Applications/VAV-
Single-Duct-Applications/VAV-Single-Duct-Control-Logic-Selection/Box-Reheat-Coil-Control-VAV-SD/Di
scharge-Air-Reset-by-Zone-Control-VAV-SD
107. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2015/papers/bs2015_2166.pdf
108. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10135128/3/Wei_Optimal Chiller loading in dual-temperature chiller
plant.pdf
109. https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy25osti/94684.pdf
110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778824011538
111. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bso/2020/papers/bso2020_Jia.pdf
112. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140700711000028
113. https://www.aceee.org/files/proceedings/2016/data/papers/3_219.pdf
114. https://www.trane.com/content/dam/Trane/Commercial/global/products-systems/education-training/en
gineers-newsletters/airside-design/admapn059en_0916.pdf
115. https://airah.org.au/Common/Uploaded files/Resources/SkillsWorkshop/sw087.pdf
116. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/102497489/Koulani_Optimized_damper_control_of_pressure_and_airflow_in_ve
ntilation_systems_2014_pub.pdf
117. https://kodelabs.com/resources/duct-static-pressure-optimization/
118. https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/airbase_10471.pdf
119. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/optimizing-vav-ahu-flow-through-advanced-static-pressure-thomas-tr
ang-lyboe
120. https://www.watts.com/our-story/brands/tekmar/references/how-outdoor-temperature-reset-controls-s
ave-energy
121. https://www.pmmag.com/articles/106071-outdoor-reset-control-no-quality-hydronic-system-should-be
-without-it
122. https://forums.temcocontrols.com/t/outdoor-temperature-reset-example/1630
123. https://uat-pnp.nycenergytools.com/documents/soos/chilled-water-supply-temperature-reset/
124. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1883793
125. https://www.elliottenergyconsulting.com/articles/chilled-water-reset
126. https://www.elliottenergyconsulting.com/articles/condenser-water-reset
127. https://support.coppertreeanalytics.com/knowledge-base/kaizen/fault-detection/chilled-water-system-
condenser-water-supply-temperature-setpoint-reset-control-is-poor/
128. https://coolingbestpractices.com/technology/cooling-controls/optimize-chillers-automatic-entering-con
denser-water-temperature-reset
129. https://www.trane.com/content/dam/Trane/Commercial/global/products-systems/education-training/en
gineers-newsletters/waterside-design/adm-apn045-en_0912.pdf
130. https://xray.greyb.com/hvac/electronic-expansion-valve-control
131. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2775&context=iracc
132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359431124012006
133. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200211922259190.page
134. https://www.tekworx.us/blog/free-cooling-and-hvac-optimization/
135. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-C13-40e3bcd870fdacc264d3ce055bef2121/pdf/GOVP
UB-C13-40e3bcd870fdacc264d3ce055bef2121.pdf
136. http://eng.harran.edu.tr/~hbulut/A17.pdf
137. https://www.pnnl.gov/projects/om-best-practices/air-side-economizers
138. https://hvacknowitall.com/blog/aint-no-fooling-with-free-cooling
139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778810000447
140. https://www.secontrols.com/SEControls/media/General/Document Library/Night-Purge-India.pdf?
ext=.pdf
141. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01436244241262605
142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778820308422
143. https://www.kais99.org/jkais/journal/Vol16No10/p38/qgp/qgp.pdf
144. https://koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201610364972135.page
145. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-E-PURL-LPS99139/pdf/GOVPUB-E-PURL-LPS99139.pd
f
146. https://www.cedengineering.ca/userfiles/M04-037 - HVAC - Guide to Demand Control Ventilation.pdf
147. https://bigladdersoftware.com/epx/docs/8-0/engineering-reference/page-082.html
148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9132786/
149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778823009477
150. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=860846
151. https://docs.johnsoncontrols.com/bas/r/Johnson-Controls/en-US/Johnson-Controls-Central-Plant-Optimi
zation-10-Application-Note/Setup-and-commissioning/Pressure-and-temperature-control/Chilled-water
-pump-differential-pressure-control/Differential-pressure-setpoint-reset
152. https://docs.johnsoncontrols.com/bas/r/Metasys/en-US/Controller-Tool-Help/17.0/Setpoint/Miscellaneous
-Modules/Central-Plant/CHW-Pump-Differential-Pressure-Setpoint-Reset
153. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1623&context=iracc
154. https://support.coppertreeanalytics.com/knowledge-base/kaizen/energyrules/chilled-water-system-dif
ferential-pressure-setpoint-reset-control-is-poor/
155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778815303467
156. https://www.eng-tips.com/threads/reset-pressure-setpoint-method-and-primary-pump-variable-spee
d.492774/
157. https://airah.org.au/Common/Uploaded files/Resources/SkillsWorkshop/sw105.pdf
158. https://library.e.abb.com/public/e6947b08406b4b9297511032f5ebd0fd/Refrigeration_brochure_3AXD
50000534739_RevA_lowres.pdf
159. https://irc.wisc.edu/export.php?ID=74
160. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140700700000840
161. https://www.danfoss.com/en/about-danfoss/articles/dds/using-vfds-in-refrigeration-and-cold-storage-
applications-2/
162. https://docs.k-rp.com/product-data-installation/HEAD-PRESSURE-GUIDE_1101110.pdf
163. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23744731.2024.2404814?src=
164. https://www.ashrae.org/file library/technical resources/standards and guidelines/standards
addenda/g36_2018_x_20210709.pdf
165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352710223016431
166. https://iris.polito.it/retrieve/4e97dba8-d973-4197-b92b-b4641caa2cd0/PhD_Thesis_Brandi.pdf
167. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC30088.pdf
168. https://vbn.aau.dk/files/481606559/Energy_Optimization_of_Air_Handling_Units_Using_Constrained_Pre
dictive_Controllers_Based_on_Dynamic_Neural_Networks.pdf
169. https://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/bitstream/10397/95401/1/Tang_Optimal_Control_Strategy.pdf
170. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778822008805
171. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705815029938
172. https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1049/pel2.12642
173. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20080139105A1/en
174. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261918318440
175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544220304357
176. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB8168.pdf
177. https://www.eaton.com/us/en-us/products/controls-drives-automation-sensors/industrial-control-cente
r/automation-control/hvac-control/damper-position-control.html
178. https://publications.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs/2023/papers/bs2023_1293.pdf
179. http://web.mit.edu/parmstr/Public/TC75/A11_Ch42_I-P_SI-2015 DRAFT-ncmt4.pdf
180. https://www.128plumbing.com/the-perks-of-using-an-outdoor-reset-control/
181. https://airah.org.au/Common/Uploaded files/Resources/SkillsWorkshop/sw088.pdf
182. https://decarbhealthcare.com/guidebook/525
183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778821009786
184. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132324009715
185. https://docs.johnsoncontrols.com/bas/r/Johnson-Controls/en-US/Johnson-Controls-Central-Plant-Optimi
zation-10-Application-Note/Setup-and-commissioning/Configuring-the-Waterside-Economizer-Suitabilit
y/Waterside-Economizer-Suitability/Setting-the-Economizer-Condenser-Water-Temperature-Setpoint
186. http://www.energy-proceedings.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aeab2020_paper_321.pdf
187. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/13172/131720D/Research-on-optima
l-application-of-electronic-expansion-valve-in-refrigeration/10.1117/12.3032307.short
188. https://www.rigidhvac.com/blog/top-techniques-for-hvac-electronic-expansion-valve-controller
189. http://hvac.korea.ac.kr/thesis/?page=9&wr_id=431
190. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201504641500699.view?orgId=anpor
191. http://ibse.hk/MECH4423/MECH4423_2324-08.pdf