College Algebra Ninth Edition Ron Larson Download Full Chapters
College Algebra Ninth Edition Ron Larson Download Full Chapters
DOWNLOAD
https://ebookultra.com/download/college-algebra-ninth-
edition-ron-larson/
★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (91 reviews)
PDF DOWNLOAD
Ebookultra.com
College Algebra Ninth Edition Ron Larson
Available Formats
https://ebookultra.com/download/elementary-linear-algebra-6th-
edition-ron-ron-larson-larson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/multivariable-calculus-ninth-
edition-ron-larson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/college-algebra-with-applications-
for-business-and-the-life-sciences-1st-edition-ron-larson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/algebra-and-trigonometry-eighth-
edition-ron-larson/
Algebra 2 Concepts and Skills Student Edition 2008 Ron
Larson
https://ebookultra.com/download/algebra-2-concepts-and-skills-
student-edition-2008-ron-larson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/trigonometry-8th-edition-ron-larson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/precalculus-with-limits-2nd-edition-
ron-larson/
https://ebookultra.com/download/precalculus-with-limits-3rd-edition-
ron-larson-2/
https://ebookultra.com/download/precalculus-with-limits-3rd-edition-
ron-larson/
GRAPHS OF PARENT FUNCTIONS
Linear Function Absolute Value Function Square Root Function
f 共x兲 ⫽ mx ⫹ b f 共x兲 ⫽ ⱍxⱍ ⫽
x, x ⱖ 0
冦⫺x, x < 0
f 共x兲 ⫽ 冪x
y y y
2 4
3 f(x) = x
(0, b) 1
f(x) = ⏐x⏐ 2
x x
−2 −1 (0, 0)
(− mb , 0( (− mb , 0( 2 1
−1
x
f(x) = mx + b, f(x) = mx + b, −1 (0, 0) 2 3 4
m>0 m<0 −2 −1
2 2 2
1 1 f(x) = ax 2 , a>0
(0, 0)
x x x
− 3 −2 −1 1 2 3 −2 −1 1 2 3 4 −3 −2 1 2 3
−1 f(x) = ax 2 , a < 0 −1
f(x) = x 3
−2 −2
−3 −3 −3
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Rational (Reciprocal) Function Exponential Function Logarithmic Function
1
f 共x兲 ⫽ f 共x兲 ⫽ ax, a > 1 f 共x兲 ⫽ loga x, a > 1
x
y y y
3 1
f(x) = f(x) = loga x
x 1
2
1 f(x) = a x f(x) = a −x
(0, 1) (1, 0)
x x
−1 1 2 3 1 2
x
−1
SYMMETRY
y y y
(x, y) (x, y)
(−x, y) (x, y)
x x x
(x, − y)
(− x, − y)
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
College Algebra
Ninth Edition
Copyright 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Other documents randomly have
different content
The criticisms of the Gary plan on the ground that the long school
day and varied curriculum overload the pupil can scarcely be
sustained in view of the fact that the “school day” is not merely a
lengthening of the ordinary public school day, but an absorbing, in
healthful activities of play, exercise and manual work, of time which
would otherwise be spent in demoralizing street and alley or in
idleness at home. We have seen that this additional activity is not
gained at the expense of the academic studies, but comes from
giving the children interesting things to do in the surplus hours in
which they are usually left to take care of themselves. The freedom
of the Gary schools, and the constant passing back and forth
between school and home, church, etc., does not seem to make for
truancy. The percentage of attendance in November, 1914, was for
boys 92.9, for girls, 91.6,—a remarkable record when it is considered
that boy truancy in most city schools is much the greater. For the
year 1913-14 the percentage of attendance was for boys 89.5, for
girls, 89.2.
The criticism of the Gary school on the ground that the shopwork
either involves the risk of exploiting the pupil, or else introduces him
to manual activity at too early an age, ignores the fact that the
manual work is really unspecialized and is introduced so gradually
into the child’s life that it is scarcely felt as work. “Play” and “work”
are merged in “interesting activity,” and almost unconsciously the
child finds himself absorbed in work which may be his vocation later
on. Whether it is to be his vocation or not, the Gary school believes
that such work is a good thing in the education of all children. Many
educators believe that the novel form of shopwork in the Gary school
offers a solution for the problems of industrial training. There is great
risk, in schools where shopwork is introduced apart from the
academic work, as in special technical high schools, of an
undemocratic and invidious distinction between the manual worker
and the brain worker. In plans of organization, such as the Ettinger
plan in New York City, with a preliminary course of “prevocational
training,” in which the prospective industrial pupil in the seventh and
eighth grades discovers by hasty experimentation which trade his
aptitudes fit him to pursue, there is great danger that the vocational
work will be left unassimilated to the rest of the school work and the
child trained into a narrow specialist. Such “vocational training”
deserves all the criticism that has been directed against it by the
opponents of a too “utilitarian” education. The Gary type of
vocational training keeps the industrial work constantly in touch with
the other activities, and makes it a really “cultural” branch of the
school community work. And because the children lay their
foundations of skill and interest so early and work at real work under
real workmen, their training from a practical point of view is as good
as, if not better than, the special trade school is likely to give them.
More shops are actually supported in the Gary school than even the
most elaborate special trade school can afford to provide. The
correlation of day courses with evening continuation courses, the
great attention to science, the emphasis on the social and communal
bearing of all activities,—all this means a higher type of vocational
training than has been worked out generally in the public school. If
he is intelligent, he will be better qualified for skilled work than the
more narrowly trained worker. “This is the age,” says Superintendent
Wirt, “of the engineer, of machinery, and of big business. The school
business enterprises offer a type of industrial and commercial
education facilities ... adapted to modern industry and business.
There are big business problems and machinery problems in the
school.” These problems evolved in the life of a school community
give an education, he holds, superior to what can be given even in
schools narrowly devoted to shop-training. And it can give the
training in small groups or even to individuals, where the special
school has to give instruction in large classes to make it pay at all.
As Mrs. Barrows-Fernandez puts it, “If you believe that vocational
education is confined to specific training for a trade, and that this
must be carried on in a separate trade school, and that general
education has no relation to it except as it may add a fringe of
culture, then you will think that there is no vocational education in
Gary. But, on the other hand, if you belong to the group that believes
that what children under sixteen need in the way of vocational work
is not specialized trade training on top of an inadequate elementary-
school education, but fundamental industrial training closely related
to the science and academic work, and made real and natural
because it is one of the many activities of the whole school,—then
you will come away from Gary feeling that the vocational work there
represents the soundest point of view and the best practical
accomplishment in vocational work for children under sixteen that
can be found anywhere in the country.”
In New York City, where an extended experimentation is being
carried on with the Gary plan, considerable controversy is said to
have arisen over the provision of the Gary scheme which permits
outside institutions, including churches, to coöperate with the school
and take children for a few hours a week for any special work,
amusement, or instruction which the schools cannot give. The fear
was expressed there that this provision would mean the entering
wedge of religion into the public school.
As outlined by Mr. Wirt, however, the Gary plan holds no brief for
religious instruction. It has no concern with any church activity as
such. What it tries to do is to coördinate the community child-welfare
agencies with the school. The lengthening of the school day absorbs
an hour which would otherwise be spent by the city child in the
street, or at home, church, or settlement. All the Gary school does is
to organize and systematize this hour. It may be spent by the child
either in play or auditorium at the school, or in any outside activity
which provides wholesome activities for children. The object is to
coördinate the community opportunities so that they may function
regularly and vitally instead of spasmodically as at present. The
school gives to all the agencies which pretend to be interested in the
child’s welfare a chance to spend themselves effectively. It brings up
to the level of public discussion, for the first time, the question what
sort of home, church, and neighborhood activities are good for
children.
Into this scheme the church enters merely as a community
institution. As long as any considerable number of the parents of the
children in a school believe that religious instruction is valuable, no
public school which attempts to be really public can refuse to release
children for this purpose, just as it releases them for playgrounds,
settlements, libraries, home music, or other instruction. This outside
time is not taken from study. Nor are the children turned out into the
streets to be taken care of by the churches and other institutions. No
child is excused unless the parents make formal application. If the
parents do not do this, the child stays at the school for the full seven
or eight hours of work, study, and play. The burden of responsibility
rests entirely upon the parents and the churches. The teachers have
nothing to do with the matter, either in segregating the children or
seeing where they go. There seems to be little fear that the practice
will not conform to the theory. Mr. Wirt tells us that his work-study-
and-play school had been functioning for twelve years in Bluffton and
Gary before any religious organization took advantage of this
provision. The idea that the opportunity would unduly increase
religious influence in the schools seems to be groundless. In the
Jefferson School in Gary, which has been longest in operation under
the Wirt plan, and where the fullest efforts have been made by all the
sects and religions of the town to provide this supplementary
instruction, scarcely half the children in the spring of 1915 were
going out to any sort of religious training whatever. And in one of the
Wirt schools in New York, where unusual efforts have been made by
some of the churches to meet the new plan, not even half of the
children are released for this purpose. In another Wirt school in New
York, none of the children are released, because there is no demand
for it on the part of the parents.
What the Gary plan seems to do is not to bring religion into the
schools, but for the first time to take it out of the schools. The
relations now between church and school are hidden. The Gary plan
brings them out into the open. The establishment of a fair, free, and
open relation between the school and all other community
institutions is of utmost importance. No institution which has anything
valuable to offer the child will lose by such a relation. No outside
power can dominate or even partially control a public school which
has established it.
We may sum up the Gary school, then, as primarily a school
community for children of all ages between nursery and college, providing
wholesome activities under a fourfold division of work, study, play, and
expression. It aims to provide the best possible environment for the
growing child throughout the course of a full eight-hour day. The school
community, replacing the old-time education of household and school,
aims to be as self-sustaining as possible, all activities contributing to the
welfare of the school community life. By the multiple use of school
facilities, on the plan of public-service principles, such a school may be
provided at no more expense than that of the ordinary public school. The
economics effected by this multiple use enable the Gary school to
provide recreational and educational facilities for adults as well as
children all the year round, as well as to pay better salaries to teachers,
and completely solve “part-time problems.” It makes the school the
cultural center of a community with parks, libraries, and museums
functioning as contributory to the school, as well as all other activities
which provide wholesome interests for children. It makes the school, for
the first time, a genuine “social center,” and a genuinely “public school” in
a comprehensive sense scarcely realized hitherto.
No better evaluation of the Gary plan has been made than that by
William Paxton Burris, Dean of the College for Teachers, University
of Cincinnati, in the Bulletin of the United States Bureau of
Education, 1914, no. 18. In his opinion the school system at Gary
provides:—
“1. For the better use of school-buildings day and evening,
including Saturdays, the year round, making it possible to save large
sums of money expended for this purpose.”
This multiple use of school plants, which secures greatly increased
facilities at greatly reduced cost, while it permits the giving of full-
time instruction to all the children of even the congested school
districts, is the aspect which has appealed most generally to
educators outside of Gary. For administrators confronted with
problems of part-time, it makes an examination of the Wirt plan
almost essential. No educationist can afford to ignore a plan which,
in mere details of mechanical administration, provides not only a full-
time program, but actually a longer school day, for all the children in
the city school—something hitherto considered impossible in the
larger school systems. The Gary plan seems to provide an easy
solution for these difficulties which grow progressively worse in the
large city with every year.
“2. The possibility of a better division of time between the old and
the new studies, the ‘regular studies’ and ‘special activities.’”
The Gary plan provides not only an enriched curriculum, but an
unusually favorable and harmonious balance between the various
activities. The larger emphasis on science and manual work has not
made the school ultra-utilitarian in its purpose. The Gary schools
have not been “turned into mills and factories,” as certain educators
have feared. For many visitors, the Gary school is a living refutation
of the idea that the useful and the beautiful are opposed. The new
school plants, such as the Emerson and Froebel, are spacious and
dignified buildings, with many touches of thoughtful taste that one
usually associates only with the high schools of exceptionally
wealthy and cultivated suburban communities. The presence of
pictures, the cultivation of music, the emphasis on expression, the
teaching of literature, the systematic use of the public library, indicate
a determined effort to bring the cultural aspects of education to the
front, and make them as real a part of the school life as the more
striking special activities. The “application” work involves constant
care and interest in the enhancement of the beauty of the school
plant. The actual charm of the school life in Gary—the
conservatories and gardens, the play, the freedom of the children,
the dramatic expression, the absence of strain and confusion, the
happiness of the children—is testified to by most visitors. A very
beautiful school life seems to be lived, paradoxical as it may seem,
where every activity is motivated by application and expression,
where the learning is by doing and not by mere studying.
“3. Greater flexibility in adapting studies to exceptional children of
all kinds, thereby diminishing the necessity of special schools.”
The Gary plan provides a school which is adapted to almost every
kind of a child. It does not try to adapt the child to the school, casting
off automatically those who do not fit. But it adapts the school to the
very unequal needs and capacities of the children. Such a school
seems to be one where capacities will be developed wherever there
are capacities, a school where something like equal educational
opportunity can be given, as it cannot be in the ordinary public
school. It can almost be said that the only reason for keeping a child
home from the Gary school would be a case of contagious disease.
If the child is physically weak, so that he cannot undertake all the
work, he may take what he can and use the other facilities of the
school as one would use a sanitarium for regaining health. The daily
program permits a child to spend all his time in the special activities
if this is best for him. He may spend his time resting in the open air,
or in supervised play until he gains strength to do the regular work.
The defective child may work at what he can in the way of manual
activity. And the retarded child may take such activities as will
awaken his interest, and gradually bring him up to the level of his
grade. An elementary school system like this has no need for the
expensive special open-air schools, classes for defectives, etc.,
special trade schools or commercial schools. In the organized life of
the complete school community, the child may find approximately
what he needs.
“4. The possibility of more expert teaching through the extension
of the departmental plan of organization.”
“5. The better use of playtime, thereby preventing influences which
undo the work of the schools.”
“6. More realism in vocational and industrial work, by placing it
under the direction of expert workmen from the ranks of laboring
men, selected for their personal qualities and teaching ability as well
as their skill in the trade industries.”
The organization of the industrial and other vocational work offers
many practical advantages to the young worker. Not only does he
have the evening continuation courses and the privilege of coming
back to the school shops in the daytime when unemployed, but the
most practical foundation is laid for the development of coöperative
courses between school and factory on the lines of the well-known
Fitchburg plan. The flexibility of administration and curriculum in the
Gary school allows him to attend the academic class during slack
hours, or to divide the job and the school with another student. The
Gary school even offers to provide special instruction for part-time
students for any desired number of hours a week, or allows them to
work on their own initiative. In 1914 in Gary there were said to be
about one hundred part-time students. The plan of the all-year
school also offers peculiar opportunities to the young worker. The
opportunity of finding employment is increased fourfold. For instead
of throwing all the pupils on the market to find jobs at the same time,
one quarter of those who needed work would be available
throughout the year. Instead of one continuous apprentice in an
industry or trade, therefore, four pupils could take his place in
alternation. Instead of one young workman spending all his time at
work and none at school, four would be getting a full schooling of
thirty-six weeks in the year, and twelve weeks of practical apprentice
training in the factory. Thus the Gary plan makes it easy for the
young worker to get the maximum benefit of the modern school and
his apprenticeship at the same time.
DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENDITURES
Operation and
maintenance—
Janitors’ wages $3,908.80 $4,936.02 $1,131.11 $12,203.15
Fuel, water, light, 4,815.03 5,234.70 1,205.11 13,799.49
supplies
Total cost of $8,723.83 $10,170.72 $2,336.22 $26,002.62
operation
Maintenance 7,420.40 6,050.67 7,418.36[3] 26,574.62
3. Includes new heating plant.
ENROLLMENT
Day Enrollment Average No. of All Enrollment
School daily teachers Average per
attendance salary teacher
Emerson 895 769.80 31 $915.78 27.56
Froebel 1,847 1,591.06 57 813.56 31.50
Jefferson 764 661.70 22 759.71 33.50
All schools 4,789 4,043.98 142 802.59 33.70
Summer 1,700
schools
Evening 182,348[4]
schools
4. Number of student hours.
ON THE
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com