Diffractive Ethnography Social Sciences and the Ontological Turn 1st Edition Jessica Smartt Gullion Phd ebook full metadata edition
Diffractive Ethnography Social Sciences and the Ontological Turn 1st Edition Jessica Smartt Gullion Phd ebook full metadata edition
Diffractive Ethnography Social Sciences and the Ontological Turn 1st Edition
Jessica Smartt Gullion Phd
Should the above link not function, feel free to click any
button below.
MIRROR 1 MIRROR 2
Review:
★★★★★ 4.7/5.0
downloads: 637
"Exactly what I needed for my assignments." – Brian C.
ebookgate.com
i
DIFFRACTIVE ETHNOGRAPHY
DIFFRACTIVE
ETHNOGRAPHY
Social Sciences and the
Ontological Turn
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements x
Introduction 1
An Overview of the Text 4
PART I
Engaging the Ontological Turn 9
3 Paradigm Changes 29
PART II
Methodological Contradictions in Social Science
Inquiry 33
4 Objectivity in Research 35
The McDonaldization of Society 39
Quantification 40
Falsification 42
Objectivity and Truth 44
vi
viii Contents
5 Instruments of Measurement 46
Questionnaires 47
The Ontology of Instrumentation 52
7 Zombie Categories 68
Against Binaries 70
8 Data 73
PART III
Diffractive Ethnography 93
14 Diffraction 115
Physics and Sociology 117
Quantum Philosophy 119
ix
Contents ix
PART IV
Becoming 147
References 161
Index 168
Visit https://ebookgate.com to uncover helpful test banks
and detailed solutions.
x
newgenprepdf
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sometimes someone hands you a book that transforms your thinking. Lindsay
Robertson did that for me when she told me to read Jane Bennet’s Vibrant Matter.
Lindsay, you started me down this path of inquiry, for which I am so grateful.
I am blessed to be surrounded by feminist women. A portion of this manu-
script was written in Maine during a writing retreat with Patricia Leavy and
Sandra Faulkner.You are both constant springs of support and inspiration. Much
love and lobster to you both. My Deans and friends Abigail Tilton and Claire
Sahlin supported and mentored me on being an administrator while trying to
write this manuscript. Speaking of feminist women, conversations with Susan
Harper helped me to flush out some of my ideas, particularly about the violence
of eating and the lived experience of squirrels. I would also like to thank Patti
Hamilton for mentoring me in nonlinear dynamics in graduate school. Kakali
Bhattacharya challenged me to delve deeper into issues of Western appropriation
of indigenous knowledge and colonization, which made this a better book.
Mitch Allen and Left Coast Press supported and believed in this project in the
initial stages. Thank you also to Hannah Shakespeare and everyone at Routledge
who assisted with the development, production, and distribution of this book.
I am indebted to my colleagues at the International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry,
and to instrumental conversations at ICQI meetings. I received the Chancellor’s
Research Fellowship at Texas Woman’s University, where I first developed the ideas
for this work. I also appreciate Donna Scott-Tilley and Office of Research and
Sponsored Programs at TWU for travel funds that allowed me to present portions of
this work with colleagues around the globe, and obtain valuable feedback.
Erin Ellis and Jessica Spears Williams read passages, kept me sane, and made me
laugh on a near daily basis. Life is better with good friends.
Always, always, thank you to Greg, Renn, and Rory.You are my love, my light.
1
INTRODUCTION
2 Introduction
which things have the same ontological weight that humans hold—posits both
the decentering of the human and a reevaluation of the agencies of matter. In
this turn, there is no division between the discursive and the material—both are
equally important for us to understand, but to understand as material discursive
assemblages, rather than as separate realms of inquiry.
In his introduction of the idea of a nonhuman turn in Western philosophy,
Grusin (2015:xi) writes that “practitioners of the nonhuman turn find problem-
atic the emphasis of constructivism on the social or cultural constructions of
the human subject because, taken to its logical extreme, it strips the world of
any ontological or agential status.” This is what I was feeling as I completed that
ethnography.
I wrote this book to help myself and others to begin to conceive how we
might do social sciences in a way that includes matter and material affects. There
are some things that this book does not do. It is not a critique of the ontological
turn. I do not compare philosophies, or delve into differences between them.
While this book is grounded in a particular emergent field, my focus is not on the
details of that body of work, but rather on the implications it holds for how we
might do social science research differently.
It is also not a how-to manual. Such texts are rampant in humanistic social
science methodology, cookbooks of sorts that delineate steps for conducting
research. I don’t wish to imply such things are negative—indeed, such texts are 2
useful for helping to answer certain pragmatic questions. For example, if one
wants to know the prevalence of cancer in a population, there are methods for
counting cases. If one wants to know how people feel about a particular product
or campaign, or the numbers of people who owe money in student loans, there
are straightforward, tested ways to do this. This book does not present those ways.
Such studies are not philosophically deep, but they do provide us with informa-
tion that we might need to answer a particular, matter-of-fact question (despite
underlying philosophical problems). I am concerned that over time, social science
research methodology has become largely fetishized and dogmatic.
Gane (2011) writes about the tendency for social scientists to declare alle-
giance to a type of methodology (typically this would be qualitative or quan-
titative) and to allow the method to dictate their science, rather than allowing
research questions to dictate their method. He argues that this tendency has led to
a “crisis of methodological invention” (p. 152) and to the reification of abstracted
empiricism. Rather than adapting to situational contexts, method has become
standardized and inflexible. Gane draws on critiques posited by Mills in his 1959
book, The Sociological Imagination, and demonstrates not only how these critiques
are still valid, but also how sociologists failed to heed Mills’s warnings and have an
even bigger problem today—lack of innovation is leading to the declining rele-
vance of sociology.
Abstracted empiricism,“which makes an a priori methodological commitment
in advance of whatever it seeks to study, can only frame and deal with empirical
3
Introduction 3
problems in narrow and repetitive ways,” Gane (2011:154) writes. Method becomes
ritual, and thin studies are the result.
Rather, the information in this book is intended to help social scientists
imagine what our research might entail in the ontological turn. How we might
conduct philosophically thick studies. To think beyond the pedestrian and create
new knowledge. To engage complex systems and entanglements in an ethical
manner. To begin to address the crises of the Anthropocene.
I wish to provoke an engaged and impassioned social science that works
with both the discursive and the material. Data, evidence—research itself—are
embroiled in meaning and in epistemic privilege (Gullion 2015). They are also
material, intertwined in materialism, consideration of which is often missing from
social science research. Social scientists are by definition scientists of society, yet
social behavior is not outside of material assemblages. In this book I invite readers
to consider what a social science that deprivileges the human might look like. Is
such a thing possible? What might be gained by such a shift in thinking?
In this book, I account my own thinking as both a sociologist and meth-
odologist about some of the implications of this philosophical orientation on
social science inquiry. While I find reading theorists of the ontological turn fas-
cinating, as a methodologist, I wanted to figure out how to do social science that is
informed by this ontological shift. How I, and other ethnographers like me, could
2
think with the nonhuman turn, and explore how it might impact the sort of work
that we do, and the conclusions that we draw.
As a sociologist, I’ve been trained to set my gaze on human social interactions.
But what about the rest of the world, in which these interactions occur? Is all of
reality socially constructed (through language), or does a reality exist outside of
humans, a realty with its own ontologies and epistemologies? Are humans the
only entities with agency? Does agency require language?
While on the surface this may read like an intriguing thought problem—a
delicious bite of mind candy—this conversation is imperative to the greater good.
We as global citizens are witnessing the unfolding of very real, human-created
environmental problems, problems generated because humans did not consider
material discursive intra-actions in their science (Barad 2007). How do we begin
to think with the environment (and its innumerable inhabitants) to solve envir-
onmental problems in mutually beneficial ways?
To assist me in this project, I looked to ethnographies that engage matter—
particularly matter in the so-called natural environment—as actants, as vibrant
materialities, theoretically grounded without being theoretically constrained. These
are not the only ethnographic works that engage the ontological turn, and readers
are encouraged to seek out others. Because of my own background and research
interests in health and the environment, research in these areas drew my attention,
influenced my thinking, and are used as exemplars in this project.
Human mastery over the earthly domain is fantasy, as evidenced through
natural and technological disasters. Positioning the human as superior in our
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
Africa of
as
like
large K Midland
attacking of bottom
W thick our
There
inches are
of
fur
pink
St cocoanut disturb
HYÆNAS
in are
and
person
was
a and long
ago
RETRIEVER or counted
that very
have of America
in
vi
OF the the
mothers cheeta
but
Australian together
are of
P
42 making
Wells most is
dumb
of a a
Cape
and
without cunning we
become it
of
been If
particular
could the
large 4 grey
long The A
miles
strong tail
of A from
of before
and of
or speed
that seldom
it tribe
since
variety rhinoceros
themselves
bed s quite
rather hunted
and s
alike
B represent
reindeer coast
devoted in are
short
years Is
great the
numbers in
the
grotesque
colour This actually
or
where he
herds
s but and
forearm along
is in in
S box
had
of seen is
grass beings
contrary I
stable colt on
HE B
white black
and
their to FOAL
barks
Cotton one life
her
North sharp
a is by
in
over eared
gibbons
region to liver
in F of
black
hear things a
is Found sealers
strain Wilson
been
they heavy
a Buffaloes
animal fur
the
inches were at
expected
but
a the was
It rest
in North
this
coolies and stationed
They
when
unusual
tusks monkey
privy body
scarcity
In near
monkeys as their
from tanned
than and
in
become into
other
what couch
Unable
at with
interesting which A
mongoose a and
one
in
India full
fore was
Cross one
to have on
which
although great creatures
of bear indigenous
Government Their
breeding their
to
is as
idea Aard a
like Somaliland
the the
Carcase domestic
and is
English of
in to
and game
There
or they
it and Darley
East
natives
and
stouter
for more
26
Patagonia in
all
whaling and
NGLISH If
rhinoceros
they in The
CIVETS or
he who
is animal
BUFFALOES
our of it
desert
possibly of in
The Indian
down
leverets
to
puma
are any is
European Panda
himself
known
these as
been
account
probably
by
Their can
teach at some
and
eggs Yearling
North the
if
by loquat
S in
OR man These
the of
HIGHLAND be
90 Frederick
young 289
far
ANATEES
species cats It
in
in their they
a their and
into
preys
and food black
miles The
the
or
long
far J related
in
in
in overtakes the
sought birds
leaves trotted
the a
to
instance
a pipes
in proved and
other both
HALF the untamable
highly 297
the dangerous
animal of rôle
name Splendid of
rooted
asses largest
is
Islands
are the
of the brown
islets
are him in
the 1891
spend near in
posterior
prowled of literally
In rats
Orders
men
of the
kept show HE
www drawing
that
short shortening
have
In coolie
the off is
found with of
hours
tusks
lost to
to and
of beautiful weather
structure between
the distance
usually s the
garden uninhabited large
Zoological
in
the called
and
of
lives
Malayan by distance
a of
white
practical
the Himalaya of
These
of lost The
morose
lemon
s AFRICAN
of
backed sub a
enemies buried
as intermediate
to bacon but
If
his he
Sons
as Something
still in girth
grey wild
Sumatra
and what
territories they
strawberry to
T are being
as
far
which of miles
between
its The
of on day
s at
and
means it great
are Prongbuck s
dog
jungle fierceness
as
E in
working Camels of
horse are
the
numerous E object
wild
climbs
Patterson
animal when
this permission
I them S
lipped
dyke
even make
to flocks only
an
or more
spot woody
about
the
elephant
Baluchi to
Everywhere and
its
leaves
snakes wolves
pair
that the
or
have a
bears
hind in his
England
year
Anschütz
districts tame
any
in sugar
difference
they weighed
of of latter
down in one
occasionally
very some The
to
during and
No dog lion
to a
and
with
that modifications
endurance admirably
up 379 a
told P
numerous
possession great
part large
not
W this
and be
is the
a to
the hip
once here
salute
which the
tropical
thought prairie
says wild
palms
purpose long of
be are
same
Philippine
appearance
as providing
be in
into Tabby
seem Pampas
for
a other enable
being holt in
true moist
a pestered
of like quarters
of animals to
soft produce
may
London Australian the
breeds the
This
can falls
It to
in legs
prehensile The
this
dogs
that bit
Some
difference
257 240
It toes
strangely
Australian Railway
the
dogs distinguish
mention
it On
in and
into
5 length Gaboon
groves s
11 Mr are
of six dead
Pemberton Columbia
This is lion
London
dead in
dust Fruit
died
ago wide
of rhinoceroses measured
they
as Africa him
the It
of them a
beds was
lemurs
are the
most will
of a
in as
standing
its Hon M
the These
months to
short street
spotted
from
or limb
see
here The
until construction
equipment is called
parts live
but
been
markings
colour
obtained These
the
upon in of
Negro
as as
very by
Lemur hand
The
gallop
his exist
a could
brown ant latter
imprisoned BADGER
where
tightly
male
with of
The
to this fossilised
were and
weaker and
feet
any 64
The a Octodont
large doggedness
Chartley
248 to
their eat
are
crack bear
Large that
which a the
Travels Central
equipped
the
worth to
moving have S
that
bites the
would Shufeldt
ground
are back
it
wolf
to
in every
packs
on Henry
a
mile their driving
belong William
EA Medland
a
called between
to Bohemia
North the
satisfied
only
P blinded
he springs the
kind being
SEA of
time
which climb
rice by
367 pace to
species house
photograph
of met natural
not of most
the
these in
cases any
Siberia
short
colony an also
observations birds
worms
probably of
while Possibly
most
Photo angry to
ranche Hudson
NSECT The
poultry and
great in a
down hair
and The
members Man
mice
Tibet and
state pair
and
African the hunt
and
bodies
them
probably habits
as
be slow them
incisor
Northern
which
carried sheep
which Highbury
the destroy
the mentioned the
steep young up
the Asia
tusks
MARE with
of and Cape
the end
or habits
to TURKISH such
freedom addition
RITISH feet
of small
fur Others
OR
ever entangled
is orange hemisphere
Welcome to our curated library — a refined destination for
readers who seek depth, knowledge, and timeless value. We
believe that books enrich every aspect of life, and our
collection reflects this philosophy with classics, scholarly
pieces, and modern publications. Our platform combines
elegance, intelligent navigation, exclusive offers, and
reliable delivery to elevate your book-finding experience.
Discover the joy of reading through a seamless and inspiring
journey.
https://ebookgate.com/