Scribd
Upload
165 views18 pages

Joe Kilminster's Role in Challenger Disaster

The Challenger disaster was caused by failure of the O-rings sealing the joints of the solid rocket boosters due to low launch temperatures. Engineers at Morton Thiokol, who built the boosters, recommended delaying the launch when temperatures dropped below freezing. However, NASA managers pushed for launch to meet political deadlines. At launch, the cold caused the O-rings to fail almost immediately, allowing hot gases to escape and destroy the external fuel tank, dooming the shuttle and crew. The disaster highlighted issues around engineering ethics and the pressure to ignore safety concerns for political reasons.

Uploaded by

Aishwarya Murukesan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
165 views18 pages

Joe Kilminster's Role in Challenger Disaster

The Challenger disaster was caused by failure of the O-rings sealing the joints of the solid rocket boosters due to low launch temperatures. Engineers at Morton Thiokol, who built the boosters, recommended delaying the launch when temperatures dropped below freezing. However, NASA managers pushed for launch to meet political deadlines. At launch, the cold caused the O-rings to fail almost immediately, allowing hot gases to escape and destroy the external fuel tank, dooming the shuttle and crew. The disaster highlighted issues around engineering ethics and the pressure to ignore safety concerns for political reasons.

Uploaded by

Aishwarya Murukesan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

The Challenger Disaster A Case-study in Engineering Ethics

Shuttle Components Orbiter Liquid Rocket Booster Solid Rocket Booster

Shuttle Components

Chronology of the Related Events


1974
NASA contracts Morton Thiokol

1976
NASA accepts the design based on the Titan missiles The joints are sealed by
Two synthetic rubber O-rings, 177 clevis pins, Heat shield putty

The Cause of the Disaster

Early Problems
1977
Tests at Thiokol show O-ring leakage Joint is made stronger by changing sizes

1981
Post-launch investigation showed O-ring erosion due to hot gages.

Early Problems
January of 1985 launch
First cold-weather launch Post-launch investigation showed joint failure Tests showed O-rings inability to fill the gap due to joint rotation at lower temperatures

Early Problems
July 1985
Thiokol redesigns the joints w/o O-rings The design was not ready for Challenger launch

Political Climate
Congress is unhappy with NASA

Competition with Russians to be the first to observe Halleys comet. Pressure to launch before President Reagans State of the Union Address

Days before Launch


First launch attempt postponed

The next launch date was set and was to be attended by Vice President Bush. The temperature at launch: 29 degrees F.

Days Before Launch


NASA starts an investigation of the effect of low temperatures on the O-ring seals Organization involved
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Morton Thiokol

Engineering Investigation Before Launch


Players at NASA
Larry Mulloy: SRB Project Manager at Marshall

Players at Thiokol
Roger Boisjoly: A SRB engineer Arnie Johnson: A SRB engineer Joe Kilminster: SRB engineering manager Alan McDonald: SRB engineering director Bob Lund: Vice president for engineering Jerald Mason: General manager

Engineering Investigation Before Launch


Boisjoly and Johnson recommend the launch to be postponed. Bob Lund, the VP for engineering agrees and makes a similar recommendation.

Investigation Before Launch


Larry Mulloy, the NASA manager of SRB asks Joe Kilminister, the SRB manager at Thiokol, for his opinion. Kilminister agrees with other Thiokol engineers and recommends a launch delay.

Investigation Before Launch


After discussion with Mason Lund reverses his decision regarding launch! Thiokol recommend the launch to proceed

The Launch in January 1986


The overnight temperatures drop to 8 F The temperature of SRB at launch is 28 F There is an immediate blow-by of hot gas at launch. The seal fails quickly over an arc of 70 degrees.

The Launch in January 1986


The by-products of combustion forms a glassy oxide that reseals the joint. The brittle oxide is shattered Hot gases quickly burn through the liquid rocket booster

The Aftermath
Causes of the accident are attributed to
Inability of the O-rings to expand and seal at low temperatures. Heat shield putty did not perform at low temperatures Fits and seating of the O-ring was affected by low temperature.

The Aftermath
After all the testimonials
Biosjoly is taken off the project and subtly harassed by Thiokol management.

You might also like