Chapter 6 Strategy
Chapter 6 Strategy
Related Diversification
A firm entering a different business in which it can benefit from leveraging core competencies, sharing activities, or building market power
Economies of Scope
Cost savings from leveraging core competencies or sharing related activities across businesses in a corporation
Core Competencies
A firms strategic resources that reflect the collective learning in the organization
Core Competencies
Core competencies reflect the collective learning in a firm:
How to coordinate diverse production skills How to integrate multiple technologies How to market diverse products and services
Core Competencies
Core competencies must enhance competitive advantages by creating superior customer value Different businesses in the firm must be similar in at least one important way related to the core competence Core competencies must be difficult for competitors to imitate or find substitutes
10
Sharing Resources
Corporations can also achieve synergy by sharing tangible and value-creating resources across their business units
Common manufacturing facilities Distribution channels
Sales forces
11
Sharing Resources
Sharing activities provide value in two primary ways:
Cost savings Revenue enhancements
12
Market Power
Firms abilities to profit through restricting or controlling supply to a market or coordinating with other firms to reduce investment.
13
Market Power
Pooled Negotiating Power
The improvement in bargaining position relative to suppliers and customers
Vertical Integration
an expansion or extension of the firm by integrating preceding or successive production processes
14
Abuse of bargaining power may negatively affect relationships with customers, suppliers and competitors
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
15
Vertical Integration
16
Vertical Integration
Benefits
A secure source of raw materials or distribution channels. Protection of and control over valuable assets. Access to new business opportunities.
17
Vertical Integration
Risks
Costs and expenses associated with increased overhead and capital expenditures Loss of flexibility resulting from large investments Problems associated with unbalanced capacities along the value chain Additional administrative costs associated with managing a more complex set of activities
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
18
19
20
Transaction Costs
Contract or outsourcing can result in continuing transaction costs that have to be factored into the benefits of vertical integration
Search costs
Negotiating costs Contract development costs
These costs must be compared to the added administrative costs associated with vertical integration
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
21
Unrelated Diversification
Entering a different business that has little horizontal interaction with other businesses of a firm.
22
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate administration making substantial changes to the assets, capital structure, and/or management in a new business
23
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate management must have:
Insight to detect undervalued companies or businesses with high potential for transformation Required skills and resources to turn the businesses around
24
Corporate Restructuring
Can involve changes in
Assets Capital / Financial Structure Management
25
Portfolio Management
Assessing the competitive position of a portfolio of businesses within a corporation, Developing strategic alternatives for each business Identifying priorities for the allocation of resources across the businesses
26
$$$
BUSINESS UNITS
27
Portfolio Management
Develop corporate expertise in identifying acquisition candidates that complement existing businesses or meet corporate growth objectives Determine most efficient allocation of corporate resources to support new businesses
Determine optimal capital allocation to fund all the businesses in the portfolio
Provide high quality oversight and support for units
Strategic alliance
Internal development
29
31
32
Partner firms can reduce manufacturing (or other) costs in the value chain
Pool capital, value-creating activities, facilities
33
34
36
Internal Development
Allows companies to capture all the value of product development without having to pay acquisition premiums or share profits with partners
More time consuming to implement than acquisition or strategic partnership with wellpositioned company Firm must have all the internal capabilities tangible and intangible resources to effectively implement
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
37
38
39
Case Analysis: American Idol Far More Than Just a Television Show
German media giant Bertlesmann owns numerous widely-popular TV shows, such as American Idol
Bertlesmann leveraged its early success with American Idol by duplicating it in over 30 countries In each country, the American Idol format is customized to accommodate cultural differences, achieving similar popularity as in the US Bertlesmann has increased its revenue streams from American Idol through licensing broadcasting rights, product merchandise, CDs and concerts
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
40
LePages argued that the rebate volumes were so large that retailers would exclude offering any competing product
LePages was 3Ms only significant competitor in these markets LePage asserted that 3Ms strategy was not only to reward large volume buyers, but to purposefully eliminate LePages as a competitor The courts found in favor of LePages and awarded treble damages
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
41
Through vertical integration, Shaw has developed a high degree of cost control
Shaw has integrated backward to produce a significant volume of polypropylene fiber used in its carpets, limiting its exposure to supplier pressure The company has integrated forward to acquire large floorcovering retailers in an effort to control retail pricing
42
Case Analysis: Campbell Soup Divests Godiva to Focus on its Core Business
Campbell Soup sold its Godiva Chocolate business in 2007
Godiva had been a profitable brand with high growth potential Campbell Soup sold the company because it didnt fit the corporate focus on offering nutritious products and focus on simple meals
43
46
Case Analysis: How Anti-Takeover Measures May Benefit Multiple Stakeholders Not Just Management
Anti-takeover measures can often be interpreted as means of protecting incumbent management, rather than shareholders and other stakeholders As a result of some hostile takeover attempts, numerous states have put in place legislation favoring stakeholders during takeover litigation Examples of situations where stakeholder interests (employees) were preserved include the hostile takeover attempt to purchase Dayton-Hudson (now Target) Stakeholder interests (customers) were ignored during Oracles extended hostile takeover of PeopleSoft and the acquisition became strictly a financial deal
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980
47