Heating and
Cooling DegreeDays for Jordan
By
Prof. Ali Badran
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Jordan
Presented at the Scientific Day, in Cooperation with Mechanical Engineering
Branch
Jordan Engineers Association, 1/6/2013
The Heating Degree-Day Method: Background
It was found that: Heating load (Tb Ta)
Where Ta is the mean outdoor temperature, and Tb is an assumed
.constant value of this temperature, called base temperature
For example, if Tb is 18 C and Ta is 15 C then T = 3 C, then
Q1 = U x A x T = U x A x 3
if Ta is 12 C then T = 6 C, then
Q2 = U x A x T = U x A x 6 = 2 Q1
A Degree-Day is a unit of one day where Tb Ta = 1 C
For example, if T = 3 C for one day we have 3 x 1 = 3 DegreeDays
if T = 6 C for 30 days we have 6x 30 = 180 DegreeDays
if T = 5 C for 120 days we have 5 x 120 = 600
Degree-Days
Heating Degree Day
(HDD): Alternative
: Approach
Heating
Degree
Hour
HDH (T Ta (t ) )
: (HDH)
N
k 1
summation overHDH
the hourly data of the year;
HDD
hours in the year
24
Then
N= number of
What does HDD do for
you
For example, the mass of fuel consumed over a heating season may be calculated for a certain
:locality from the following equation [1]
Mf = 24 Q x HDD (Cd/Eta)/ (Ti To) x CV
Where: Q is the calculated heating load, kJ/h
Cd is an emperical correction factor, which depends on the value of HDD. For example,
. it
is 0.8 for HDD up to 1000, and 0.75 for HDD for 1001 t0 2000
.Eta is an efficiency factor, 0.8 for liquid fuel and 0.5 for gaseous fuel
. CV is the calorific value of the fuel, in kJ/kg
As an example, let the heating load for an apartment in Irbid be 35,495 kJ/h (9.86 kW) or
41,273 kcal/h. The HDD for Irbid is 1129, Ti is 21 and To is 5 C, the heating value of the fuel
is 39,000 kJ/kg and the boiler efficiency is 0.8. The resulting Mf is 1445 kg or 1700 liter
Indoor design Temp.
Cooling Degree Day (CDD)
could be taken as Ti,d =
21 C
The outdoor Temperature is taken as the
. daily average (from weather data)
Thus, Ti,d = 21 C ( for cooling, the
T
To ,outdoor
is larger than 21 C; N= total numberk of days;
and
is the base temprature for cooling
which is the mean daily temperature above
which air conditioning
should be turned on in
N
.order to obtain
comfort
CDD
(To , k 21 )
k 1
Cooling Degree Day (CDD): Alternative
: Approach
CDH
CDD
24
: Cooling Degree Hour
Summation over
the hourly data of the weather data
N
year
CDD (To , k (t ) 21 )
k 1
Then
This work
The degree-day method is based on the
assumption that the heating or cooling load is
proportional to the difference between a mean
daily outdoor temperature Tm and an outdoor
temperature, called base temperature T b. The
mean temperature is the average of the
maximum and the minimum outdoor
temperatures during the day. The base
temperature is the outdoor temperature below
or above which heating or cooling is required
for the space, respectively.
:In the heating situation, Tm < Tb and qloss [W] is given by
qloss = Ktot ( Tb Tm)
(1)
In the cooling situation, Tm > Tb and qgain [W] is given by:
qgain = Ktot ( Tm Tb)
(2)
The total heat transfer coefficient Ktot may be understood in conjunction with the overall
heat transfer coefficient Uov [W/m2 oC] of the building envelope, which appears in the equation:
qloss = Uov Aov ( Tb Tm)
(3)
Where Aov is the overall area of the building heat transfer envelope. It can be shown that:
Uov Aov = (Ui Ai )
Therefore
Ktot = (Ui Ai )
(5)
(4)
In case of heating, Ktot may be easily calculated
using eqn. 5 because solar, occupants and lighting
effects are usually neglected since they are
considered as an addition to the load.
For example, for a heated two story residence in
Amman whose walls are insulated, and based on
an overall area of 637 m2 and an average U factor
for the building envelope of 0.9 W/m2 oC, the value
of
( Ui Ai ) is 573 W/ oC, which is the value of Ktot in
the heating situation.
Should the residence be un-insulated, the value of
( Ui Ai ) is 1333 W/ oC and dividing by the overall
area of 637 m2 produces an average U factor of
2.09 W/m2 oC. The above values of heating case are
Table 1 Values of overall, effective overall and total heat transfer coefficients for several
building types under base temperatures of 28 oC and 26 oC for cooling in Jordan
*Units of Uov are (W/m2 oC);** units of Ktot are (W/oC); # units of Uov,eff are (W/m2 oC)
, Heating
Tb = 15.5 oC
Building Category
Uov*
Ktot**
Residential villa, insulated
0.9
573
Residential villa, un-insulated
2.09
Residential condo, insulated
Cooling, Tb = 28 oC
Cooling, Tb = 26 oC
Ktot **
Uov,eff #
Ktot**
35
22,000
17
44,000
1,333
44
28,250
22
56,500
0.83
758
370
21,150
185
42,300
Residential condo, un-insulated
2.75
2,510
612
35,000
306
70,000
Public building, insulated
0.79
3,830
571
172,500
286
345,000
Public building, un-insulated
2.65
9,309
768
237,500
384
475,000
Educational building, insulated
0.92
2,813
1,052
201,000
526
402,000
Educational building, un-insulated
2.8
7,059
1,282
245,000
641
490,000
Health-care facility, insulated
0.75
1,710
921
131,000
461
262,000
Health-care facility, un-insulated
2.67
6,078
1,081
153,750
541
307,500
Uov,eff#
In case of cooling, Ktot may be obtained from a typical
building whose cooling load qgain is known, using eqn. 2 for
the cooling situation gives:
Ktot = qgain / ( Tm Tb)
(6)
In a manner similar to eqn. 3, the cooling load, qgain may be
calculated by defining an effective overall heat transfer
coefficient Uov,eff that takes into account heat gain due to
solar, occupants and lighting effects such that:
qgain = Uov,eff Aov ( Tm Tb)
(7)
For example, for an air-conditioned two story
residence whose walls are insulated in Amman, the
heat gain is 88 kW, the overall envelope area is
637 m2, then, for a Summer base temperature of
28 oC and approximating the outdoor mean
temperature to be equal to an indoor mean
temperature of 24 oC, Uov,eff = qgain / Aov ( Tb Tm) =
88,000 / 637(28 24) = 34.5 W/m2 oC.
The value of Ktot in the cooling situation is obtained
from eqn. 6, which is, from the previous example:
88,000 / (28 24) = 22,000 W/oC. Should the
residence be un-insulated, the heat gain is 113 kW
and the resulting Uov,eff is 44.35 W/m2 oC and Ktot is
28,000 W/oC. Those values of cooling situation
were listed in Table 1.
Qyear = (Ktot / ) DD
(8)
Where is the efficiency of the heating or cooling system and DD is the
heating or cooling days for heating or cooling.
For heating, the degree days are given by the expression:
HDD = (1 day) days( Tb Tm)+
(9)
And for cooling, the degree-days are given by:
CDD = (1 day) days( Tm Tb)+
(10)
The plus sign at the upper right of the parenthesis in Eqs.
(9) and (10) indicate that only positive values are taken
into account.
The HDD and CDD are used mainly to calculate the
annual heating and cooling requirements, Qh and Qc,
respectively, in kWh such that:
Qh = (Ktot / ) HDD x 24/1000
(11)
Data base for temperature
Table 2 Monthly mean temperatures for main Jordanian weather stations
.over the last 15 years (1996 - 2010)
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
8.7
9.7
12.8
17.0
21.9
24.9
27.1
26.9
24.6
21.4
15.4
10.7
15.2
16.7
20.0
24.3
28.6
31.4
33.5
33.3
30.6
26.9
21.5
16.7
9.5
10.4
13.3
17.0
21.5
24.4
26.3
26.5
24.7
21.6
16.1
11.6
7.0
7.8
10.4
14.9
19.8
22.1
24.2
24.1
22.0
19.1
14.1
9.5
7.3
8.0
10.8
14.5
18.9
21.6
23.3
23.6
21.6
18.7
13.8
9.6
16.3
17.7
20.9
24.9
29.1
32.4
34.8
34.7
32.2
28.4
22.3
17.6
8.0
9.5
12.9
17.5
21.8
24.9
26.8
27.1
24.4
20.4
14.1
9.8
Station
Amman
Aqaba
Irbid
Jubaiha
Taffieleh
Ghor
Safi
Ma'an
Results and discussion
Table 3 Heating and cooling degree days for the seven Jordanian locations
on the basis of Tb = 15.5 oC for heating and Tb = 24 oC for cooling
Location
.Jan
.Feb
.Mar .Apr
May
June
July
. Aug
.Sep
.Oct
.Nov
Dec
Amman
209
162
84
28
93
90
17
148
608
HDD
228
CDD
Aqaba
143
222
295
288
189
90
HDD 9
1227
CDD
Irbid
186
143
68
12
71
78
21
121
518
HDD
182
CDD
Jubaiha
264
216
158
18
42
186
884
HDD
CDD 9
Taffieleh
254
210
146
30
51
183
874
HDD
CDD 0
Ghor Safi
27
158
252
322
332
246
136
HDD 0
1473
CDD
Yearly
Table 4 Heating and cooling degree days for the seven Jordanian
locations on the basis of Tb
=
=15.5 oC for heating and Tb = 22 oC for cooling
Location
.Jan
.Feb
.Mar .Apr
May
June
July
. Aug
.Sep
.Oct
.Nov
Dec
Amman
209
162
84
90
153
152
81
148
608
HDD
476
CDD
Aqaba
205
282
357
350
249
152
HDD 9
1595
CDD
Irbid
186
143
68
72
133
140
81
121
518
HDD
426
CDD
Jubaiha
264
216
158
18
68
65
42
186
884
HDD
136
CDD
Taffieleh
254
210
146
30
40
50
51
183
874
HDD
90
CDD
Ghor
87
220
312
397
394
306
198
HDD 0
Yearly
Comparing heating and cooling degree days obtained in Tables 4 and 5 with those obtained by
Kodah and El-Sharawi(1990), those obtained from RetScreen(2013) and those listed in Alsaad and
Hammad (2011), Table 5 is arranged to show only the yearly heating and cooling degree days for
the above locations.
Table 5 Yearly heating and cooling degree days for the seven Jordanian
locations
compared with other works
This work
RetScreen
Kodah and
El-sharawi
Alsaad and
Hammad
HDD
at Tb = 15.5oC
CDD at Tb=
24oC
CDD
at Tb= 22oC
HDD
at Tb=18 oC
CDD
at Tb=18 oC
HDD
at Tb=15.5
o
C
HDD
at
Tb=18.3 oC
Amman
608
228
476
824
3411
791
1228
Aqaba
1227
1595
903
3477
244
Irbid
518
182
426
827
3416
28
1129
Jubaiha
884
136
827
3416
979
1478
Taffieleh
874
90
909
3337
996
1498
Ghor Safi
1473
1923
824
3411
23
147
Location
Fig. 1 Average temperatures vs. time in Amman for the month
.of
February over last 15 years
14.0
12.0
10.0
Te mp
re
e
C
,ratu
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Fig. 2 Average temperatures vs. time in Amman for the month of
June over last 15 years.
26.5
26.0
Te mp
re
C
e
, ratu
25.5
25.0
24.5
24.0
23.5
23.0
22.5
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Conclusions
1. Heating degree days in Jordan were found to
be slightly lower than those previously
reported. The reason is probably that there is
an increase in ambient temperature of about
0.1 oC per year.
2. Cooling degree days for seven locations in
Jordan were found at two base temperatures,
Tb = 24 and 22 oC. The latter was found to be
more realistic because there is an increase in
ambient temperature of about 0.1 oC per year.
.Conclusions, contd
3. Both HDD and CDD were compared with
values obtained through Retscreen and it was
found that those obtained from the latter
show higher values of HDD and much higher
values of CDD. The use of Retscreen values is
not recommended.
4. It is time to review the thermal insulation, the
heating
and the air conditioning codes to reflect
those findings