Strategy: Achieving The Fit
Strategy: Achieving The Fit
Chapter - 04
Achieving the fit
Supply Chain
Strategy
Prof. Manoj K Srivastava
Operations Management Area
[email protected]
http://mks507.vistapanel.ne
Management Development Institute-
t Gurgaon
upply Chain Efficiency Curve
Fitting the SC to the customer or vice versa?
Understand the customer Wishes
Deployed inventory
Lean
Flexible suppliers
Mismatch
High utilization
supply chain
management
Agile
Responsive
Mismatch
Minimum inventory
Low-cost suppliers
supply chain
High utilization
management
Low cost
ENVIRONMENTS BEST SUITED FOR EFFICIENT AND RESPONSIVE SUPPLY CHAINS
Lead time strategy Reduce but not at expense of Aggressively reduce even if costs
greater cost are significant
Supplier selection strategy Cost and low quality Speed, flexibility, quality
Transportation strategy Greater reliance on low cost modes Greater reliance on responsive
(fast) modes
Achieving Strategic Fit
Uncertainty/Responsiveness Map
Responsive supply Companies try to move
chain Zone of Strategic fit High Cost
Responsiveness
e of it
spectrum n F
Zo egic
tr at
S
Service - the ability to deliver different quantities of goods through managing capacity not simply operationally but
strategically (no longer sufficient to rely on economies of scale). Develop capabilities to manage capacity flexibly to deliver
products and services to customers when they are required in the quantities demanded, e.g. from mass production to mass
customization (from n to 1)
Speedy response- developing responsive capabilities to deliver goods and services when they are required, e.g.
efficient consumer response, quick response
Suited to customer requirements -developing flexibility capabilities - e.g. agile, lean supply chains,
innovations and new product developments
Standards - developing supply chain strategies to assure customer quality standards are met effectively and co-operate
within supply chains to compete across supply chains
Systems focused on customer satisfaction -re-design business processes and develop enabling
strategies for all relevant parties including customers to view supply chain information relevant to them (e.g. collaborative,
co-operative rather than competitive strategies)
Structures and relationships - for example, develop digital supply chain strategies to replace unnecessary
inventory movements by moving and exchanging information instead of goods
Push Vs Pull
Strategy
Which Strategy ?
Push / Pull Boundary
Furniture SC
Grocery SC
Traditional PC Industry
Dell - the Pull-Push boundary
When is the use of pure market mechanisms
appropriate in buyer–supplier relationships?
Market dimension
uncertainty
Leverage
needs Market
uncertainty mechanisms
inappropriate
Resource dimension
Low Cost of changing suppliers High
Elements of process partnership relationships
Attitudes
Trust
Long-term Sharing
expectations success
Joint Multiple
learning points of
contact
Closeness of
relationship
Joint co- Few
ordination of relationships
activities
Cumulative positive
Degree of closeness
experiences
…I believe I can trust
Cognitive you because I think I
Time
trust know you enough to be
confident you will behave
as I would wish...
…I trust you because I
know that you know that I
Bonding Based on
wouldn’t let you down and
trust feelings
you know that I know that
you wouldn’t either......
Some factors influencing the nature of
network relationships
Economies of Market
scale position
Transaction Market
costs risks
Nature of REQUIREMENTS
OPERATIONS
network MARKET
RESOURCES
relationship
Learning Market
potential structure
Resource Competitive
deficiencies behaviour
Other Issues Affecting Strategic Fit
uMultiple products and customer
segments
uProduct life cycle
uCompetitive changes over time
Multiple Products and
Customer Segments
uFirms sell different products to different
customer segments (with different
implied demand uncertainty)
uThe supply chain has to be able to balance
efficiency and responsiveness given its
portfolio of products and customer
segments
uTwo approaches:
n Different supply chains
Product Life Cycle
u The demand characteristics of a product and the
needs of a customer segment change as a
product goes through its life cycle
u Supply chain strategy must evolve throughout the
life cycle
u Early: uncertain demand, high margins (time is
important), product availability is most
important, cost is secondary
u Late: predictable demand, lower margins, price is
important
Competitive Changes Over Time
uCompetitive pressures can change
over time
uMore competitors may result in an
increased emphasis on variety at a
reasonable price
uThe Internet makes it easier to offer a
wide variety of products
uThe supply chain must change to
meet these changing competitive
conditions
Expanding Strategic Scope
uScope of strategic fit
n The functions and stages within a supply chain
that devise an integrated strategy with a
shared objective
n One extreme: each function at each stage
develops its own strategy
n Other extreme: all functions in all stages devise
a strategy jointly
uFive categories:
n Intracompany intraoperation scope
n Intracompany intrafunctional scope
Different Scopes of Strategic Fit Across a Supply Chain
Competitive
Strategy
Product Intercompany
Development Interfunctional Intracompany
Strategy Intrafunctional
at Distributor
Supply Chain
Intracompany
Strategy Intracompany
Intraoperation
Interfunctional
at Distributor
Marketing at Distributor
Strategy
Bullwhip effect
What are the reasons for the channel
not being coordinated?
u Lack of information
n Information about the demand is not
transmitted up stream.
u Conflicting interest
n Retailers would like to have daily deliveries
n Daily deliveries are expensive for the
suppliers
n Manufacturers would like to have a stable
production environment.
n Buyers would like to have the flexibility to
adjust to the demand and change orders
price fluctuation
Bullwhip Effect
erratic shifts in orders up and down the supply chain
order batching
•excessive inventories
•poor customer service
•lost revenues
•ineffective shipments
•missed production schedules.
A common way to solve the bullwhip problem is by sharing information along the supply
chain through EDI, extranets, and groupware technologies. For example employing a vendor-
managed inventory (VMI) strategy, the vendor monitors inventory levels and when it falls
below the threshold for each product this automatically triggers an immediate shipment.
Inaccurate information can cause minor
fluctuations in demand for a product to be
amplified as one moves further back in the
supply chain. Minor fluctuations in retail
sales for a product can create excess
inventory for distributors, manufacturers,
and suppliers.
Bullwhip effect
u Bullwhip effect refers to the phenomenon where orders to the supplier tend
to have larger variance than sales to the buyer (i.e., information
distortion) and the distortion propagates upstream in an amplified form
(i.e., variance amplification).
u Examples
§Order batching
§In order to save on shipping or ordering costs, firms order a full pallet or full truck load
§Trade promotions and forward buying
§Supplier offers a discount on product ordered in a specific time period
§Supplier offers a quantity discount
§A retailer orders a large quantity intending to take advantage of a discount and sells excess product to a
second retailer (this strategy is called diversion)
§Reactive and over-reactive ordering
§A retailer who is not sure that demand is stable over time may act aggressively when faced with periods of
lower or higher than expected demand
§Shortage gaming
§A retailer who wants to insure product from an under-capacitated supplier may over order expecting to
only receive a portion of the ordered quantity
§Demand forecast updating / Inflated Orders
§IBM Aptiva orders increased by 2-3 times when retailers thought that IBM would be out of stock over
Christmas
§Long cycle times
§Long lead times magnify this effect
Bullwhip effect: Remedies
Centralizing demand information occurs when customer demand information is available to
all members of the supply chain.
Reducing lead time. Order times can be reduced by using EDI (electronic data interchange).
Strategic partnerships. The use of strategic partnerships can change how information is
shared and how inventory is managed within the supply chain. These will be discussed later.
Cross-docking. This involves unloading goods arriving from a supplier and immediately loading these
goods onto outbound trucks bound for various retailer locations. This eliminates storage at the retailer’s
inbound warehouse, cuts the lead time, and has been used very successfully by WalMart and Xerox among
others.
Delayed differentiation. This involves adding differentiating features to standard products late in the
process. For example, Bennetton decided to make all of their wool sweaters in undyedyarn and then dye
the sweaters when they had more accurate demand data. Another term for delayed differentiation is
postponement.
Direct shipping. This allows a firm to ship directly to customers rather than through retailers. This
approach eliminates steps in the supply chain and reduces lead time. Reducing one or more steps in the
supply chain is known as disintermediation. Companies such as Dell use this approach.
Sharing Information: Retailers may give the supplier frequent access to actual consumer demand data
so that the supplier can make its production plans accordingly.
Vendor Managed inventory: The retailer no longer decides when and how much inventory to order.
Instead, the supplier decides the timing and quantity of shipments to the retailer (e.g. P&G and Wal-Mart)
Smoothing the flow of products: Supplier and the retailers coordinate the timing of orders so that
retailers do not place orders at the same time.
Achieving Coordination in
Practice
u Quantify the bullwhip effect
Lead time L
Mfctr. Retailers Customers
• Retailers forecast customers demand
and then place orders with manufacturer
• Manufacturer receives orders from retailers
u Reduce uncertainty
n POS
n Sharing information
n Sharing forecasts and policies
u Reduce variability
n Eliminate promotions
n Year-round low pricing
u Reduce lead times
n EDI
n Cross docking
u Strategic partnerships
n Vendor managed inventory
Conflicting Objectives in Supply Chain
1. Decentralized supply chain: each member has his own interest and act
independently
2. Self-interested decision makers: every member of the supply chain optimizes his
own objective.
3. These self-interested members’ decisions may not align with the optimal decisions
for the overall performance of the supply chain.
4. Inefficiencies across supply chain lead to decentralization cost
5. Solution: to coordinate the members to act as if they are a centralized supply chain
(i.e., one decision-maker makes decisions in behalf of the whole supply chain)
Our goal: to attain performance of centralized supply chain with decentralized
decision making
How do we do that?
1.A contract is agreed by and announced to all members before they make
decisions
2.Each member independently decides and acts
3.The contract is executed
We say a decentralized SC is coordinated by a contract, if
The total profit of decentralized SC equals the total profit of centralized SC, and
All members are better off under this contract, compared to the case without such a
contract (uncoordinated case)
Coordinating S.C. Inventory
q Consider a simple demand driven supply chain: a buyer and a
supplier
q Supplier Buyer Customers
q
q The buyer produces D= 10,000 units/year of a product at a constant
rate. Each time the buyer places an order for a certain
component, the ordering cost is Sb= $100. The buyer’s inventory
2 DS b 2(10,000)(100)
EOQand
holding cost is H = $10/yr b = =
optimal =
ordering quantity: 447
H 10
q
q The supplier produces an order whenever one is received from the
buyer.
q Each time the seller sets up to produce a batch of
components, the production setup cost is Ss = $300.
$ 11,184
Supplier’s cost (at Q=447)
= Ss (D/EOQb) = 300(10,000/447)
= $6,711
$ 8,944 Buyer’s cost (at Q=447)
= (2 x D x H x Sb)
= (2 x 10000 x 10 x 100)
$ 6,711 = $ 4,472
$ 5,589
Supplier’s cost (at Q=894)
$ 4,472 = Ss (D/EOQb) = 300(10,000/894)
= $3,356
$ 3,356 SC overall cost (at Q=894)
= (2 x D x H x (S b + Ss))
= (2 x 10000 x 10 x 400)
= $ 8,944
Buyer's optimal Centralized supply chain's
quantity optimal quantity Cost saving
Q=447 Q=894
Supplier cost $6,711 $3,356 $3,356
Buyer cost $4,472 $5,589 -$1,116
Supply chain cost $11,184 $8,944 $2,239
u Ten years later, the company expanded to the U.S., Japan and
Eastern Europe. Sales in 1991 reached 2 trillion.
2. Coordinated Planning
u VMI projects
n Dillard Department Stores, JCPenney and Wal-
Mart
n Sales increases of 20 to 25%
n 30% inventory turnover improvements
Quick Response
uThe supplier receives POS data from
retailers, and use this information
to synchronize their production and
inventory activities.
u
uThe retailer prepares individual
orders, but the POS data is used by
the supplier to improve forecasting
and scheduling.
Quick Response vs. VMI
u Sales information passed back to the
supplier.
u Bullwhip effect is reduced.
u What’s the difference?
n Who chooses the order quantity?
n VMI: Supplier
n QR: Retailer
n Who chooses when to order?
n VMI: Supplier
n QR: Retailer
Two Types of Products
Functional Products Innovative Products
(Soup) (Fashion clothing)
Demand Uncertainty Low (forecast error) High (forecast error)
uMarket mediation
n Ensuring that the right variety of
products are available at the right
place, at the right time, in the right
quantities
Supply Chain Management
Chapter-09
Information Visibility
introducing
EPC
Prof. Manoj K Srivastava
Operations Management Area
Management Development Institute-
Gurgaon
[email protected]
http://mks507.vistapanel.net
What is EPC?
The Electronic Product Code (EPC) is an identification scheme for universally identifying
physical objects via Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags and other means.
Extremely long barcodes, this greater data capacity affects the business process because it in
turn allows a greater degree of unique identification.
The Key Difference
UPC – contains just enough information to identify the class of a product
EPC – contains more information to identify the product uniquely
It is not necessary for UPC to be “universal”
A typical example would be an automotive tyre
Universal Product Code (UPC) will say “this is a class-x tyre”
The Electronic Product Code (EPC) will say “this is a class-x tyre with a serial #35686975.”
RFID: UPC vs. EPC
UPC EPC
-Requires line-of-sight readers -Tags can be read from many ranges
-Only one product can be scanned at -Many products can be scanned
a time simultaneously
-Tags can store large amounts of data
-Uniquely identifies products
Research says worldwide RFID spending will jump
from $300 million in 2004 to $2.8 billion by 2009,
and that most will centre on the global supply chain
(EPC Global the Source January 2005)
An AMR Research study found early EPC/RFID adopters in the retail and consumer
packaged goods (CPG) industries have lowered their supply chain costs between
three and five percent.
n Semi-passive
n Operational power provided by battery
n
n Active
n Operational power provided by battery -
Difference
Active RFID Passive RFID
Tag Power Source Internal to tag Energy transferred using RF
u from reader
Bar Code
Passive RFID
125 kHz & 13.56 MHz ISO 15693 & ISO 14443-3
Active RFID
ISO 18000-7
GPRS
Frequencies of operation
Frequency Range Tag cost Applications
n ge nce
t ra fere
s ter
Microwave: nge i100
n feet $25+ Highway toll collection
M
2003
Source: http://www.symbol.com/products/rfid/rfid_next_generation.html
Comprehensiveness
Applications
u Keyless entry Animal and human implantation
–Avid
u EPC –Pet - ID
u Proximity cards –VeriChip
u Libraries RFID - privacy legislation
u Security device –REAL ID Act
n Bookstores
Balanced Supply Chain Scorecard
formulating 3rd Generation BSC for supply chain
$34,416,000
Days of supply = = 29.6
($425,000,000)/(365)
SCOR: Customer Facing
When applied to supply chain context a small number of balanced supply chain measures be
tracked based on four perspectives:
1.Financial perspective (e.g., cost of manufacturing and cost of warehousing )
2.Customer perspective (e.g., on-time delivery and order fill rate)
3.Internal business perspective (e.g., manufacturing adherence-to-plan and forecast errors)
4.Innovative and learning perspective (e.g., APICS-certified employees and new product
development cycle time)
aligning activities with strategy
Kaplan R S and Norton D P (1992) "The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance", Harvard Business Review, Jan – Feb, pp71-80
The Strategic Balanced Scorecard Framework
The
The Vision
Vision &
& Strategy
Strategy
Financial
Effect To
To satisfy
satisfy our
our shareholders,
shareholders, what
what financial
financial
objectives
objectives must
must we
we accomplish?
accomplish?
Customer
To
To achieve
achieve our
our financial
financial goals,
goals, what
what Results
customer needs must we satisfy?
customer needs must we satisfy?
Cause
Internal Business Process
To
To satisfy
satisfy our
our customers,
customers, in
in which
which internal
internal
business processes must we excel?
business processes must we excel?
1.Stakeholder Satisfaction – who are the key stakeholders and what do they want and need?
2.Strategies – what strategies do we have to put in place to satisfy the wants and needs of these key
stakeholders?
3.Processes – what critical processes do we require if we are to execute these strategies?
4.Capabilities – what capabilities do we need to operate and enhance these processes?
5.Stakeholder Contribution – what contributions do we require from our stakeholders if we are to maintain
and develop these capabilities?
Neely, A.; Adams, C. (2001) “Perspectives on Performance: The Performance Prism”, Journal of Cost Management, Vol. 15, issue 1, p7-15
Know your stakeholders and their want
Delivering Stakeholder Value
Skandia Navigator™
Edvinsson and Malone (1997)
Intellectual capital is measured through the analysis of up to 164
metric measures (91 intellectually based and 73 traditional
metrics) that cover five components: (1) financial; (2) customer;
(3) process; (4) renewal and development; and (5) human
linking past, present, future intended to guide people through a comprehensive set of
measures that represent the true resources, capabilities, and
future potential of an organization.
Skandia, a Swedish insurance and financial services company, published a supplement to its 1994 annual report entitled "Visualizing Intellectual
Capital in Skandia" (Skandia, 1995). Leif Edvinsson is the corporate director of intellectual capital for Skandia.
2nd Generation performance measurement
Frameworks
qIndividual stock measures (Pike / Roos, 2001).
qStrategy maps (Kaplan and Norton, 2000)
qSuccess and risk maps (Andy Neely and colleagues, 2002)
qIC-Navigator model (Roos et al., 1997; Chatzkel, 2002)
Strategic Linkage Model
2016
Causality is
shown by
linkages
between the
objectives
selected
Ownership
is clear on what needs to be done and is fully involved in the process
Causality
identify the actions required to deliver key outcomes
Communication Learning
using feedback to identify ways of improving performance
d unambiguous information on goals roles and performance
A clearly articulated and quantified long-range description of the desired state of the
business at a particular point in time; Typically this is focused on how the organization
will look after 3-5 years
The document describes how things are at that time, rather than the things that were
done between now and then to arrive at that end point.
Destination
Statement
defined objectives
priority initiatives linked to strategic
objectives
the measures themselves
Customer Service Measures Extended Enterprise Measures
qOrder Fill Rate qTotal landed cost
qLine Item Fill Rate qPoint of consumption product availability
qQuantity Fill Rate qTotal supply chain inventory
qBackorders/stockouts qRetail shelf display
qCustomer satisfaction qChannel inventories
q% Resolution on first customer call qEDI transactions
qCustomer returns qPercent of demand/supply on VMI/CRP
qOrder track and trace performance qPercent of customers sharing forecasts
qCustomer disputes qPercent of suppliers getting shared
forecast
qOrder entry accuracy
qSupplier inventories
qOrder entry times qInternet activity to suppliers/customers
Process, Cross-Functional Measures
qPercent automated tendering
qForecast accuracy
qPercent perfect orders
qNew product time-to-market
qNew product time-to-first make
qPlanning process cycle time
qSchedule changes
Manufacturing Related Measures Logistics Related Measures
qProduct quality qFinished goods inventory turns
qWIP inventories qFinished goods inventory days of supply
qAdherence-to-schedule qOn-time delivery
qYields qLines picked/hour
qDamaged shipments
qCost per unit produced
qInventory accuracy
qSetups/Changeovers qPick accuracy
qSetup/Changeover costs qLogistics cost
qUnplanned stockroom issues qShipment accuracy
qBill-of-materials accuracy qOn-time shipment
qRouting accuracy qDelivery times
qPlant space utilization qWarehouse space utilization
qLine breakdowns qEnd-of-life inventory
qPlant utilization qObsolete inventory
qWarranty costs qInventory shrinkage
qSource-to-make cycle time qCost of carrying inventory
qDocumentation accuracy
qPercent scrap/rework qTransportation costs
qMaterial usage variance qWarehousing costs
qOvertime usage qContainer utilization
qProduction cycle time qTruck cube utilization
qManufacturing productivity qIn-transit inventories
qMaster schedule stability qPremium freight charges
qWarehouse receipts
Administration/Financial Measures Marketing Related Measures
qCash flow qMarket share
qIncome qPercent of sales from new products-to-
qRevenues market
qReturn on capital employed qPercent of products representing 80%
qCash-to-cash cycle of sales
qReturn on investment qRepeat versus new customer sales
qRevenue per employee
qInvoice errors
qReturn on assets
Purchasing Related Measures
qMaterial inventories
qSupplier delivery performance
qMaterial/component quality Other Measures
qMaterial stockouts qAPICS trained personnel
qUnit purchase costs qPatents awarded
qMaterial acquisition costs qEmployee turnover
qExpediting activities qNumber of employee suggestions
What Supplier Performance Metrics Do Companies Use?
Process Forecast accuracy, Percent perfect orders, Schedule changes, Supplier delivery performance, Material/component
Perspectives quality, Material stockout, Expediting activities, Product quality, Adherence-to-schedule, Yields,
Setups/changeovers, Unplanned stockroom issues, Bill-of-material accuracy, Routing accuracy, Plant space
utilization, Line breakdowns, Percent scrap/rework, Overtime usage, Manufacturing productivity, Master schedule
stability, Total supply chain inventory, Channel inventories, Material inventories, WIP inventories, Finished goods
inventory turns, Finished goods inventory days of supply, On-time delivery, Lines picked/hour, Damaged shipments,
Inventory accuracy, Pick accuracy, Shipment accuracy, Warehouse space utilization, End-of-life inventory, Obsolete
inventory, Inventory shrinkage, Documentation accuracy, Container utilization, Truck cube utilization, In-transit
inventories, Premium freight charges, Warehouse receipts, New product time-to-market, New product time-to-first
make, Planning process cycle time, Retail shelf display, Source-to-make cycle time, Production cycle time, On-time
shipment, Delivery times, Material usage variance, Unit purchase cost, Material acquisition cost, Cost per unit
produced, Setup/changeover costs, Warranty costs, Logistics cost, Cost of carrying inventory, Transportation costs,
Warehousing costs
Innovation APICS trained personnel, Patents awarded, Time-to-market, Number of employee suggestions, Percent of sales from
and Learning new product, Percent if demand/supply on VMI/CRP, Percent of customer sharing forecast, Percent of suppliers
Perspectives getting shared forecast, Supplier inventories, EDI transactions, Internet activity to suppliers/customers, Percent
automated tendering
Financial Income, Total landed cost, Cash flow, Cash-to-cycle time, Revenues, Revenue per employee, Return on
Perspectives capital employed, Return on investment, Return on assets
What latest? in supply chain performance measures…
SAP has commissioned this study with management consultancy Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath (PRTM) and The
Performance Measurement Group (PMG), a subsidiary of PRTM.
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
Goals Measures
Profit Margins Profit margin by Supply chain partners
Cash Flow
Revenue Growth
Cash to cash cycle
Customer Growth and profitability Financial
Return on assets Return on SC assets
Benefits
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
Goals Measures
Customer view of Product No. of customer contact points
Customer Of timeliness
Of flexibility
Relative Customer order response time
Customer perception of flexible response
Merchant Buyers-
wholesalers and retailers who purchase for resale.
Industrial Buyers-
purchase raw materials for conversion, services, capital
equipment, & MRO supplies.
Introduction
Sourcing
Sourcing policy
policy -- determining
determining dependency
dependency on
on suppliers
suppliers and
and designing
designing plans
plans to
to reduce
reduce this
this
dependency.
dependency.
Direct
Direct versus
versus indirect
indirect buying
buying -- determining
determining the
the (possible)
(possible) cost
cost benefits
benefits of
of buying
buying from
from importers
importers
and
and distributors,
distributors, or
or buying
buying directly
directly from
from the
the manufacturer.
manufacturer.
Make-or-buy
Make-or-buy analysis
analysis -- analysis
analysis of
of savings
savings opportunities
opportunities by
by eliminating
eliminating particular
particular production
production
activities
activities and
and buying
buying the
the required
required products
products from
from third
third parties;
parties; buy
buy or
or lease
lease may
may be
be considered
considered as
as an
an
alternative.
alternative.
Integration
Integration between
between purchasing
purchasing and
and other
other functional
functional areas
areas -- plans
plans aimed
aimed at
at removing
removing
interface
interface problems
problems between
between purchasing
purchasing and
and materials
materials management,
management, pure
pure engineering,
engineering, and
and between
between
purchasing
purchasing and
and financial
financial administration
administration or
or treasury
treasury
Setting
Setting up
up aa purchasing
purchasing information
information and
and control
control system
system -- analysis
analysis of
of purchasing
purchasing
information
information needs
needs and
and design
design of
of an
an automation
automation plan;
plan; possibilities
possibilities of
of linking
linking this
this system
system with
with existing
existing
information systems in other functional areas.
information systems in other functional areas.
Centralized
Centralized or
or decentralized
decentralized purchasing
purchasing -- balancing
balancing cost
cost benefits
benefits and
and strategic
strategic
considerations
considerations related
related to
to aa centralized
centralized or
or decentralized
decentralized organization
organization of
of purchasing
purchasing
Standardization
Standardization -- determining
determining possibilities
possibilities to
to achieve
achieve standardization
standardization in
in order
order to
to reduce
reduce product
product and
and
supplier
supplier variety;
variety; balancing
balancing savings
savings and
and risks.
risks.
Strategic Sourcing
Strategic sourcing methodology:
u Step 1: Project Planning and Kickoff, which suggests that a formal start to the strategic sourcing process is
warranted.
n Time savings
n Cost savings
n Accuracy
n Real time
n Mobility
n Trackability
n Management
n Benefits to the suppliers
Six stage purchasing developmental
model :
Six stage purchasing developmental model:
3. ‘Coordinated purchasing’
focus ‘serve the ‘Reduce cost’ ‘Savings through ‘Total Cost of ‘Supply chain ‘Total Customer
factory’ synergy’ ownership’ optimization’ Satisfaction’
•
Activities Clerical •Commercial
Commercial •Commercial
Commercial •Cross
Cross functional •Outsourcing
Outsourcing •Customer
Customer driven activities
•Order
Order processing•Tendering
Tendering •Contracting
Contracting buying teams •EDI/Internet
EDI/Internet •Contact
Contact manufacturing
•Negotiating •Global
Global sourcing •Systems integration
•E-Commerce •Supplier
Supplier development
•Apr
Apr supplier lists •Vendor
Vendor rating etc.•Cost
Cost models •Global
Global supplier network
Dilemmas •Initial
Initial purchasing
•Supplier
Supplier base •Contract
Contract Communication •Social
•Communication Social •Internationalization
Internationalization
•Control
Control of management management and information •resistance •HRM
HRM
purchasing •Ethics
Ethics infrastructure
•expenditure
Supplier Development Through Procurement
Needs identification
Description
No
Is there a preferred supplier?
Supplier identification Yes
and evaluation
Supplier selection
Records maintenance
The Purchasing Process
Needs Identification
Needs identification
Purchase requisition –
An internal document completed by a user
that informs purchasing of a specific need
Reorder point system –
A method used to initiate the purchase of
routine items . Typically , each item has a
predetermined order point and order
quantity
The Purchasing Process
Description
Preferred supplier
Competitive bidding
Supplier selection
Negotiation
The Purchasing Process
Supplier Selection - II
Preferred supplier
A supplier that has demonstrated its
Supplier selection performance capabilities through previous
purchase contracts and therefore receives
preference during the supplier selection
process
The Purchasing Process
Supplier Selection - III