CH 04
CH 04
Chapter 4
Agile Development
copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005
R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 1
The Manifesto for
Agile Software Development
“We are uncovering better ways of developing
software by doing it and helping others do it.
Through this work we have come to value:
•Individuals and interactions over processes
and tools
•Working software over comprehensive
documentation
•Customer collaboration over contract
negotiation
•Responding to change over following a plan
That is, while there is value in the items on the
right, we value the items on the left more.”
Kent Beck et al
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 2
What is “Agility”?
Effective (rapid and adaptive) response to change
Effective communication among all stakeholders
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 3
An Agile Process
Is driven by customer descriptions of what is
required (scenarios)
Recognizes that plans are short-lived
Develops software iteratively with a heavy
emphasis on construction activities
Delivers multiple ‘software increments’
Adapts as changes occur
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 4
Extreme Programming (XP)
The most widely used agile process, originally proposed
by Kent Beck
XP Planning
Begins with the creation of “user stories”
Agile team assesses each story and assigns a cost
Stories are grouped to for a deliverable increment
A commitment is made on delivery date
After the first increment “project velocity” is used to help define
subsequent delivery dates for other increments
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 5
Extreme Programming (XP)
XP Design
Follows the KIS principle
Encourage the use of CRC cards (see Chapter 8)
For difficult design problems, suggests the creation of “ spike solutions”—a design
prototype
Encourages “refactoring”—an iterative refinement of the internal program design
XP Coding
Recommends the construction of a unit test for a store before coding commences
Encourages “pair programming”
XP Testing
All unit tests are executed daily
“Acceptance tests” are defined by the customer and excuted to assess customer
visible functionality
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 6
Extreme Programming (XP)
sp ike so lut io ns
simp le d esig n
p ro t o t yp es
CRC card s
user st o ries
values
accep t ance t est crit eria
it erat io n p lan
refact o ring
p air
p ro g ramming
Release
s o ft wa re in cre m e n t unit t est
p roje ct v e lo cit y com p ut e d co nt inuo us int eg rat io n
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 8
Adaptive Software Development
ad ap t ive cycle p lanning Req uirement s g at hering
use s m issio n st at e m e nt JAD
pro je c t c o nst raint s m ini-sp e cs
b asic re quire m e nt s
t ime-b o xed release p lan
Release
s o ft wa re in cre m e n t
a d ju s t m e nt s f o r s u bs e q u e n t cy cle s
co mp o nent s imp lement ed / t est ed
f o cus g ro up s f o r f eed b ack
f o rm al t echnical revie ws
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: ApPractitioner’s
o st mo rt ems Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 9
Dynamic Systems Development Method
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 10
Dynamic Systems Development Method
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 11
Scrum
Originally proposed by Schwaber and Beedle
Scrum—distinguishing features
Development work is partitioned into “packets”
Testing and documentation are on-going as the product is
constructed
Work occurs in “sprints” and is derived from a “backlog” of
existing requirements
Meetings are very short and sometimes conducted without
chairs
“demos” are delivered to the customer with the time-box
allocated
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 12
Scrum
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 13
Crystal
Proposed by Cockburn and Highsmith
Crystal—distinguishing features
Actually a family of process models that allow
“maneuverability” based on problem characteristics
Face-to-face communication is emphasized
Suggests the use of “reflection workshops” to review the
work habits of the team
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 14
Feature Driven Development
Originally proposed by Peter Coad et al
FDD—distinguishing features
Emphasis is on defining “features”
a feature “is a client-valued function that can be implemented in
two weeks or less.”
Uses a feature template
<action> the <result> <by | for | of | to> a(n) <object>
A features list is created and “plan by feature” is conducted
Design and construction merge in FDD
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 15
Feature Driven Development
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 16
Agile Modeling
Originally proposed by Scott Ambler
Suggests a set of agile modeling principles
Model with a purpose
Use multiple models
Travel light
Content is more important than representation
Know the models and the tools you use to create them
Adapt locally
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with
permission by R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc., copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 17