Scribd
Upload
386 views

SBM Validation System and Process

The document summarizes the Department of Defense's (DOD) process for validating evidence of schools' implementation of School-Based Management. The 3-step process involves teams assessing documentation before, during, and after visiting schools. They examine records for accuracy and relevance, observe implementation, and discuss findings. The assessment determines a school's level of decentralized governance and identifies strengths and areas for improvement to help schools progress in self-governance.

Uploaded by

Roland Campos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
386 views

SBM Validation System and Process

The document summarizes the Department of Defense's (DOD) process for validating evidence of schools' implementation of School-Based Management. The 3-step process involves teams assessing documentation before, during, and after visiting schools. They examine records for accuracy and relevance, observe implementation, and discuss findings. The assessment determines a school's level of decentralized governance and identifies strengths and areas for improvement to help schools progress in self-governance.

Uploaded by

Roland Campos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

SBM VALIDATING

SYSTEM AND PROCESS


(The DOD)
Backgrounder

 SBM Assessment Process and Tool (APAT) was revised


for use in accrediting public schools to attain the goal
of ACCESs
 SBM and APPES/Proj. Sterling Silver tools were
merged for use in PASBE
Purpose of the Assessment
 to determine the depth of the SBM practice
alongside the principles of ACCESs

 to determine the profile of schools, which needs


assistance and which needs recognition for good
practices and for benchmarking by other schools

 to issue a Certificate of SBM Level of Practice to


each school, especially to applicants for
reclassification, effective SY 2018-2019
SBM-PASBE Quality Assurance
 Division Capability Building Program
 SBM Implementation
 Self-Assessment by the school
 External Validation Team Visits
 Application for Accreditation
 Accreditation Team Visit
ACTIVITY 1

 Simulate the DOD process


Group 1 - Before validation
Group 2 - During validation
Group 3 - After validation
The DOD Process of Validating Evidence

DOD
– a means to evaluate
validity or truthfulness
of the evidence
DOD Process
 Organize a team of at least 10 members
 Let team members select the area they want to
assess (at least 2 members per area)
 Pre-assessment meeting
- choose method (whole or part)
- study the Assessment Manual,
especially on D-O-D
- proper courtesies (if assessment is done by an
external team)
 Assessment Proper
- Process validation
- 1 day for Document analysis
- 1 day for Observation
- ½ day for Discussion
 Closure or Exit Conference
- Report Writing
Before Assessment
 Conduct a meeting with SDS, ASDS, SBM
Coordinator, and SBM Task Force
 Organize a team of at least 10 members. Let team
members select the area they want to assess (at
least 2 members per area)
 Identify the assessment method to use
 Review assessment manual/DOD process
 Prepare agenda/memorandum
 Orient schools
During Assessment
 Conduct courtesy call to the principal.
 Scrutinize all documentary evidences/artifacts
based on RACCS criteria (Relevance, Accuracy,
Currency, Consistency, Sufficiency).
 Documentary Analysis

- Gather all existing artifacts related to the indicator


- Select approach - whole-part; part-whole
- Classify documents into administrative and instructional
- Examine each indicator against RACCS criteria
(Relevance, Accuracy, Currency/Consistency, Sufficiency)
 horizontal examination
 vertical examination
 apply saturation/emergent/snowball sampling
(a point when additional samples do not anymore provide
substantial change in the info given by preceding samples)
 Meet as a team, compare findings, and decide on a
group rating whether an indicator is supported by
insufficient, sufficient, or fully sufficient evidence.

- Record your consensual rating tentatively in a


pencil. Rating is subject to further process
validation.
 Observation to obtain process evidence

- Process evidence is used to cross-validate docs.


- Observe classes or interview teachers or students.
- Use saturation sampling.
- Compare evidences for every indicator.
- Come up with a group rating whether the documentary
evidence match the process evidence.
- Record your group rating on the scale.
 Discussion

- Plenary session of the 4 evaluation teams and the


members of the school community who were
engaged in the collection and presentation of
evidence

- Friendly, non-threatening, non-confrontational


activity to explain, clarify, verify, and augment the
evidence
 Group report presents the following info:
 The mean rating of the school per standard

 The mean rating of the school for all four standards

 The commendations (strong points)

 The recommendations (areas for improvement) to fulfill

the remaining unachieved standards


 The action plan to address the recommendations

 The follow-up visits and interim reports


After Assessment
 Prepare report based on the results of the DOD.
 Furnish copy of the report to the superintendency.
 Conduct coaching or technical assistance to schools.
 Encourage schools to apply for accreditation.
 Coaching shall be employed during and after the DOD. It
is a directive approach in which a competent partner
(knowledgeable, experienced, motivated) helps a less
competent partner.
 Coaching is needed when there is deficiency in knowledge and
skills.
 Counseling is done when there is an attitude problem which
affects school performance.
 Mentoring in intended for those with potential (aptitude &
attitude) for higher responsibilities.
 Confronting is necessary in dealing with resistance.
SBM-PASBE Assessment Team
 School Level
- School Head
- School SBM Coordinator
- Key Teachers
- School Governing Council
 Division Office
- SDS/ASDS
- SBM Coordinator
- Teams of Division EPSs/PSDSs
- Team members from legal, finance, physical
facilities, administrative staff
 Regional Office
- Executive Committee
- Regional SBM Coordinator
- Teams of EPS
- Team members from the legal, finance, physical
facilities, and administrative staff
 Central Office
- Office of the Undersecretary for Regional
Operations
- TWG – SBM (EDPITAF, HNC, NEAP, FMS, BEE, BSE,
NAPSSHI, PESPA)
- TWG – QAA/M & E
- TWG Core Group on PASBE
- Office of the Planning Service
Operational Principles in DOD
 Collaboration
 Transparency
 Confidentiality
 Validity
 Reform-oriented
 Principle-oriented (ACCESs principles)
Do’s
 Give comments and suggestions positively.
 Be friendly and honest in giving comments and
findings.
 Build rapport and trust.
 Protect the confidentiality of the results because
every school has its own uniqueness.
 Have in mind the real essence of the assessment.
 Be very professional and courteous.
Don’ts
 Interviews must not be confrontational.
 Never be a fault finder.
 Do not divulge results of assessment unless
validated.
Activity 2

1. Have a copy of the Sample SBM Validation Form.


2. Accomplish the form based on data needed.
3. Determine the scores on Performance Improvement
(60%) and DOD Result (40%).
Determining the Level of Practice
 Part I. Computation for the 60% performance improvement
A. Access ------- 45%
B. Efficiency ---- 25%
C. Quality ------ 30%
100%
 Determine the score for each indicator
Marginal - 1
Average - 2
High - 3
 Determine the score

Categories Interval Scores


Good 0.5 – 1.4
Better 1.5 – 2.4
Best 2.5 – 3.0
Determining the Level of Practice

 Part II. Computation for the 40% DOD Validation


A. Leadership ------------------- 30%
B. Curriculum & Learning ------ 30%
C. Accountability ---------------- 25%
D. Resource Management ------ 15%
100%
 Add everything together to determine the level of
practice
Level Numerical Equivalent
Level 1 (Developing) 0.5 – 1.4
Level 2 (Maturing) 1.5 – 2.4
Level 3 (Advanced) 2.5 – 3.0
REMEMBER

You might also like