0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views49 pages

Pediatric Turbinate Hypertrophy NShapiro 4-22-09

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views49 pages

Pediatric Turbinate Hypertrophy NShapiro 4-22-09

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 49

Pediatric Turbinate

Hypertrophy
Nina L. Shapiro, MD
Associate Professor
Pediatric Otolaryngology
UCLA School of Medicine
Introduction: Turbinate Hypertrophy

• Chronic rhinitis leading to turbinate


hypertrophy common in both children and
adults
– 20 million people in U.S
– $2 billion annually

– Infectious or non-infectious
– Allergic or non-allergic
Turbinate hypertrophy: Children
• Smaller intranasal anatomy

• Obstruction due to turbinate hypertrophy


plays larger role in pediatric patients
relative to adults
Turbinate Anatomy
Introduction
• Children with adenotonsillar obstruction

– Adenoidectomy or Adenotonsillectomy
alleviates obstruction in presence of
enlarged turbinates

• Surgical intervention to reduce turbinate


hypertrophy may be additional option
Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy
Medical Management
• Antihistamines

• Decongestants

• Topical nasal steroids/nasal saline/sinus rinses

• Antibiotics if sinusitis

• Immunotherapy if allergic
Surgical Options
• Cold-steel turbinectomy/turbinoplasty
• Lateralization/outfracture of inferior turbinate
• Diathermy (electrocautery)
• Laser
• Cryosurgery
• Powered Microdebrider
• Radiofrequency Ablation
• Coblation
What Is Coblation?
• Bipolar configuration
• RF current through conductive
solution
– 100-300 V, 100-500 kHz
• Plasma field by RF current
– In NaCl, orange glow
• Not heat-driven
• Molecular dissociation
• Minimal thermal penetration
– Cell death (<125 mm)
Coblation
• Low frequency
– Decreased tissue penetration
– Minimal collateral tissue damage
– Surface temperatures 40° to 70° C
• Shorter current path
– Control of energy delivery
• Volumetric tissue removal

Electrocautery
• Monopolar spark between
electrode and tissue
• Localized tissue heating
– 450° to 600° C
• Tissue desiccation and
vaporization
Coblation® Turbinate
Wand
Needle-tip wand with contact
markers

Coblation foot pedal control

Saline gel application for each


turbinate entry ReFlex Ultra™ 45
Plasma Wand

Varying
durations/contacts/entries
Coblation Turbinate Reduction

• Coblation shrinks submucosal tissue


– Preserves mucosal and glandular architecture
– Immediate reduction in nasal obstruction, with
greater reduction over time
– Thermal lesion remains after tissue
vaporization
– Soft tissue attenuation/contracture progresses
Coblation Turbinate Reduction
• Operating room or in-office procedure
– Topical/Local anesthetic
– <25% require post-operative narcotic analgesic

• Fast, minimally invasive procedure


– 20-30 seconds per side
Coblation Turbinate Reduction:
Experience in Adults
• Fast

• In-office

• Restores normal breathing immediately

• Improvement progresses over time

• Minimal side effects


Coblation Turbinate Reduction:
Experience in Adults
• 50% reduction in nasal blockage at 1 week, 3, 6, and 12
months
– Easy to perform in OR or office
– Minimal pain; low incidence of post-op crusting
– Each lesion created in 10 seconds
– Minimal damage to surrounding tissue

Bäck LJ, Hytönen ML, Malmberg HO, Ylikoski JS. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:1806–1812.

Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:365–371


Clinical Effectiveness of Coblation Inferior
Turbinate Reduction

OBJECTIVE
• Determine safety and clinical efficacy of Coblation
inferior turbinate reduction
DESIGN
• 26 patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy treated
in-office with Coblation

Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.


2003;129:365-371.
Clinical Effectiveness of Coblation Inferior Turbinate Reduction
Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:365-371.

Variable Baseline D at 3 months D at 6 months


RSI domains
Facial 30.4 –11.2 –17.2*
Nasal 40.3 –10.5* –20.1*
Oropharyngeal 22.5 –4.3 –12.2*
Systemic 22.5 –7.3* –12.6*
Overall 28.5 –8.7* –15.8*
Nasal questionnaire
Nasal obstruction 3.4 –1.1* –1.5*
Time obstructed 3.5 –1.1* –1.2*
Nasal stuffiness 3.0 –0.6 –0.8*
Mucus production 2.1 –0.2 –0.3
Postnasal discharge 2.3 -0.4 –0.5
Snoring 2.8 –0.4 –0.5
Overall nasal symptoms 3.5 –1.1* –1.2*
Clinical Effectiveness of Coblation Inferior
Turbinate Reduction

CONCLUSIONS
• Inferior turbinate reduction by Coblation is
effective for inferior turbinate hypertrophy

• Clinical benefit persists for at least 6 months

Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:365-371.


Coblation vs. Microdebrider
• 60 patients randomized/not blinded
• 30 coblation/30 microdebrider
• 3,6, 12 month follow-up
• Improvement at all time points in both
groups
– Nasal obstruction
– Postnasal drip
Coblation vs. Microdebrider
• Symptoms of nasal obstruction and nasal
cavity better in microdebrider group at 12
months
• HOWEVER, only one coblation needle
pass, unknown contact duration anteriorly

Lee JY, Lee JD. Laryngoscope 116:729-734, 2006.


Radiofrequency vs. Submucous resection

• 75 patients
• 25 submucous resection/25 radiofrequency/
25 controls (medical management)
• Followed 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
• Both techniques equally effective in short-
term follow period
– Nasal obstructive symptoms, rhinomamometry
Radiofrequency vs. submucous
resection: RF benefits
• Local anesthesia
• Preserves nasal epithelium
• No increased secretions or crusting
• No nasal packing
• Sooner return to work/activities; minimal pain;
in-office
– May outweigh increased cost of RF wand
Cavaliere M, Mottola G, Iemma M. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(6): 972-978,
2005.
Radiofrequency vs. placebo
• 32 adult patients
• In-office/local anesthesia
• RF probe with or without energy delivery
• Results:
– Treatment group improved over placebo group at 8
wks/ 6mo follow-up
• Frequency/severity of nasal obstruction
• Ability to breathe through nose

Nease CJ, Krempl GA. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:291-299.
Radiofrequency vs. Placebo
• RF group at 2 years follow-up
• Same improvement in symptoms
– Frequency/severity of nasal obstruction
– Ability to breathe through nose
• Statistically significant at 8 weeks and 2
years follow-up (p<0.05) compared with
pre-op with sustained benefit.
Porter MW, Hales NW, Nease CJ, Krempl GA. Laryngoscope 116:554-557, 2006.
Pediatric Patient Selection
• Children with nasal obstruction alone
– History of allergic/non-allergic rhinitis with non-
response or non-compliance to medical therapy
• Children with turbinate hypertrophy secondary to
other problems
– Turbinate reduction in conjunction with other
procedures such as sinus surgery or T&A
• Pediatric OSA?
• Previous/concurrent adenoidectomy?
Pediatric Patient Selection
• Typically treat children >6 years that have
failed trial of medical therapy

– Most children <3 years not yet truly diagnosed


with allergies

– Young children have other sources of airway


obstruction such as adenoid hypertrophy
Pre- op Evaluation

• History/physical
• Nasal endoscopy
• Acoustic rhinometry
• Sinus CT Scan to rule out concomitant
anatomic abnormalities/sinus disease/polyps
• Prior medical management: poor
outcome/compliance
Pediatric Coblation Turbinate Reduction:
Surgical Technique
• 0-degree endoscope
• Turbinate injection with 1% lidocaine or
saline
– 2-3 cc per side
• Turbinate wand channeling
• Topical cottonoids with oxymetazoline
Coblation Pediatric Turbinate
Reduction Technique
• Create two anterior lesions within the bulk
of the turbinate
– One superior, one inferior

• 10 seconds per lesion

• Coblation setting of 6
Inferior Turbinate Channeling
• Before each insertion, apply saline gel
or other conductive media to ensure
formation of plasma field

• Activate controller foot pedal as


advance wand tip into the inferior
turbinate (power setting 4-6 coblate
based on user preference)
Inferior turbinate channeling
• Stop insertion at appropriate visualization marker
and continue to hold coblation pedal for 10
seconds to create lesion
– First marker for anterior turbinate
– Last marker for posterior turbinate

• Withdraw inactivated wand to additional markers and


repeat ablation

• When last ablation complete, remove inactivated wand

• Repeat steps to create additional channels


Post-op Evaluation
• Follow-up at 3-6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

• Physical exam/symptom improvement/reduction


in medical therapy

• Acoustic rhinometry

• Allergy follow-up as needed


Adult vs. Pediatric Techniques
• Similar settings (4-6 coblate)
• Similar duration of contact (10 seconds)

• Consider fewer passes/fewer contact points


in children
• No data on pediatric outcomes
Surgical Reduction of Inferior Turbinates with
Coblation in Children: Multi-center Trial

• Prospective/Controlled Study
(CHSD/MEEI/UCLA)

• Assess nasal obstructive symptom reduction


in children following Coblation turbinate
reduction (12 month follow-up)
Pediatric turbinate reduction:
CHSD/MEEI/UCLA
• Pediatric turbinate reduction patients
• Selection criteria
– Allergic/Non-allergic rhinitis
– Prior medical therapy failure
– Nasal endoscopy/photos
– Acoustic rhinometry
– CT Scan
– Absence of adenotonsillar hypertrophy
• Surgical intervention
• Follow-up at 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Pediatric turbinate reduction:
CHSD/MEEI/UCLA
• Medical management
– Topical nasal steroids, oral antihistamines,
immunotherapy, environmental controls where possible
• Surgical intervention
– Coblation turbinate reduction (without concomitant
procedure)
• Follow-up examination, endoscopic photos,
questionnaire, acoustic rhinometry
Pediatric turbinate reduction:
CHSD/MEEI/UCLA
• Clinical outcomes assessment
– Does coblation turbinate reduction improve
nasal obstruction in children with allergic and
non-allergic rhinitis?
– Does coblation turbinate reduction obviate need
for medical therapy?
– Are the benefits long-lasting?
Coblation Turbinate Reduction
• Stand-alone procedure
– Normal tonsils/adenoids
– Poor response to medical therapy

• Combined procedure
– T&A with significant turbinate hypertrophy
– Endoscopic sinus surgery
Coblation Use
• When is it indicated to combine T&A
or Adenoidectomy with turbinate
reduction?
– Allergic patients with ATH
– Severe turbinate hypertrophy with ATH
– Severe OSA
– One anesthetic– get it all done!
Coblation Use
• Indications to perform separately
– Turbinates alone– non-invasive, minimal
recovery, small tonsils/adenoids
– Especially if surgeon does not coblate
tonsils/adenoids
• T&A, Adenoid alone– younger child,
small turbinates
Otolaryngologist Objections

• Cost
–Minimal morbidity and long-
term benefits outweigh wand
cost
Otolaryngologist Objections
• Reluctance to change technique
• Submucosal reduction
• Ease of performance
• Patient satisfaction
• Surgeon satisfaction
• Ancillary staff satisfaction
Otolaryngologist Objections

• Reluctance to perform in children


–Safety/efficacy/minimize
medical therapy
–Just as OSD under-recognized,
Turbinate hypertrophy under-
recognized
Conclusions
• Nasal obstruction due to turbinate
hypertrophy is common in adults and
children
• Coblation turbinate reduction is safe,
effective, and long-lasting in adults
• Clinical experience is promising in children
• Prospective data is forthcoming
Studies
1. Pang YT, Willatt DJ. Laser reduction of inferior turbinates in children. Singapore Med
J 1995; 36(5):514-516.
2. Weider DJ, Sulzner SE. Inferior turbinate reduction surgery in children. Ear Nose
Throat J 1998; 77(4):304-2, 314.
3. Hol MK, Huizing EH. Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology: a review and critical
evaluation of the different techniques. Rhinology 2000; 38(4):157-166.
4. Coste A, Yona L, Blumen M et al. Radiofrequency is a safe and effective treatment of
turbinate hypertrophy. Laryngoscope 2001; 111(5):894-899.
5. Bäck LJ, Hytonen ML, Malmberg HO et al. Submucosal bipolar radiofrequency
thermal ablation of inferior turbinates: a long-term follow-up with subjective and
objective assessment. Laryngoscope 2002; 112(10):1806-1812.
6. Segal S, Eviatar E, Berenholz L et al. Inferior turbinectomy in children. Am J Rhinol
2003; 17(2):69-73.
7. Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. Clinical effectiveness of coblation inferior turbinate
reduction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129(4):365-371.
8. Chang CW, Ries WR. Surgical treatment of the inferior turbinate: new techniques.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12(1):53-57.
9. Rejali SD, Upile T, McLellan D et al. Inferior turbinate reduction in children using
Holmium YAG laser-a clinical and histological study. Lasers Surg Med 2004;
34(4):310-314.

You might also like