0% found this document useful (0 votes)
142 views22 pages

Diamagnetism and Paramagnetism: D.Wagner, "Introduction To The Theory of Magnetism", Pergamon Press

This document discusses diamagnetism and paramagnetism in materials. It introduces the Langevin diamagnetism equation, which describes the classical behavior of diamagnetism. Quantum theories of diamagnetism and paramagnetism are also presented. Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electron spins or partially filled electron shells. The quantum theory of paramagnetism describes how an applied magnetic field interacts with the magnetic moments of atoms or ions. Curie's law and the Curie-Weiss law relate the magnetic susceptibility of paramagnetic materials to temperature.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
142 views22 pages

Diamagnetism and Paramagnetism: D.Wagner, "Introduction To The Theory of Magnetism", Pergamon Press

This document discusses diamagnetism and paramagnetism in materials. It introduces the Langevin diamagnetism equation, which describes the classical behavior of diamagnetism. Quantum theories of diamagnetism and paramagnetism are also presented. Paramagnetism arises from unpaired electron spins or partially filled electron shells. The quantum theory of paramagnetism describes how an applied magnetic field interacts with the magnetic moments of atoms or ions. Curie's law and the Curie-Weiss law relate the magnetic susceptibility of paramagnetic materials to temperature.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

11.

Diamagnetism and Paramagnetism


• Langevin Diamagnetism Equation
• Quantum Theory of Diamagnetism of Mononuclear Systems
• Paramagnetism
• Quantum Theory of Paramagnetism
• Rare Earth Ions
• Hund Rules
• Iron Group Ions
• Crystal Field Splitting
• Quenching of The Orbital Angular Momentum
• Spectroscopic Splitting Factor
• Van Vieck Temperature-Independent Paramagnetism
• Cooling by Isentropic Demagnetization
• Nuclear Demagnetization
• Paramagnetic Susceptibility of Conduction Electrons

Ref: D.Wagner, “Introduction to the Theory of Magnetism”, Pergamon Press (72)


Bohr-van Leeuwen Theorem
M = γ L = 0 according to classical
statistics.
→ magnetism obeys quantum statistics.
Main contribution for free atoms:
• spins of electrons paramagnetism
• orbital angular momenta of electrons
• Induced orbital moments
diamagnetism

Electronic structure Moment


H: 1s MS
He: 1s2 M=0
unfilled shell M0
All filled shells M=0

Magnetization M  magnetic moment per unit volume


M
Magnetic subsceptibility per unit volume   In vacuum, H = B.
H
χ M = molar subsceptibility
σ = specific subsceptibility nuclear moments ~ 10−3 electronic moments
Larmor Precession
1 3 J  x 
A   d x
c x  x
1 mx
Magnetic (dipole) moment: m  d 3 x x  J  x  A
2c r3
1 I
2c 
For a current J d 3x  I d l m x  I d l  Area
loop: c

For a charge moving in a loop: J  x   q v   x  xq  ( charge at xq )


1 q q
m
2c  d 3
x  x  q v  x  x q  
2c
x q  v 
2mc
L  L Caution: we’ll set L to  L
in the quantum version
q e
Classical gyromagnetic ratio    B 
2mc 2mc
dL
Torque on m in magnetic field: Γ  mB   LB
dt
qB
→ L precesses about B with the Larmor frequency L   B 
2mc
dv q qB
Lorentz force: m  vB → cyclotron frequency c   2L
dt c mc
Langevin Diamagnetism Equation
Diamagnetism ~ Lenz’s law: induced current opposes flux changes. χ<0
eB 1
Larmor theorem: weak B on e in atom → precession with freq L   C
2mc 2

Larmor precession L Z e2 B 1 Z e2 B
I    Ze    I  2
 2
of Z e’s: 2 4 m c c 4 m c2
3
 2  x2  y 2 r 2  x2  y2  z2 → r2  2
2

N N Z e2 2 Langevin diamagnetism
For N atoms per unit volume:   r
B 6 m c2 same as QM result

Good for inert gases


and dielectric solids

experiment

Failure: conduction electrons (Landau diamagnetism & dHvA effect)


Quantum Theory of Diamagnetism of Mononuclear Systems
Quantum version of Langevin diamagnetism
ie e2
Perturbation Hamiltonian [see App (G18) ]: H     A  A    2
A2
2mc 2mc
1 1    
Uniform B  B zˆ → A B   y , x, 0  → A  0 A   By x 
2 2  x y 
ieB     e2 B 2 2
2   eB e2 B 2 2
H      
2
 x y  x y  Lz  x  y 2
4 m c  y x  8 m c 2mc 8 m c2

The Lz term gives rise to paramagnetism.

e2 B 2 e2 B 2
1st order contribution from 2nd term: E   2
 r 2

8 m c2 12 m c 2

 E e2 r 2
  B same as classical result
B 6 m c2
Paramagnetism
Paramagnetism: χ > 0

Occurrence of electronic paramagnetism:


• Atoms, molecules, & lattice defects with odd number of electrons ( S  0 ).
E.g., Free sodium atoms, gaseous NO, F centers in alkali halides,
organic free radicals such as C(C6H5)3.
• Free atoms & ions with partly filled inner shell (free or in solid),
E.g., Transition elements, ions isoelectronic with transition elements,
rare earth & actinide elements such as Mn2+, Gd3+, U4+.
• A few compounds with even number of electrons.
E.g., O2, organic biradicals.
• Metals
Quantum Theory of Paramagnetism
Magnetic moment of free atom or ion: μ    J   g B J J  LS
Caution: J here is
γ = gyromagnetic ratio. μB = Bohr magneton. dimensionless.
g  B   
g = g factor. e
B  ~ spin magnetic moment of free electron
2mc
For electrons g = 2.0023
J  J  1  S  S  1  L  L  1
For free g  1
2 J  J  1
atoms,
U  μ  B  m J g  B B mJ   J ,  J  1,  , J  1, J

For a free electron, L = 0, S = ½ , g = 2, Anomalous


→ mJ =  ½ , U =  μB B. Zeeman effect

N e   B

N e   B  e   B

N eB
 B
N e  e   B
N e x
 x e x  e x
B N e  e x M   N  N    N  x  N  tanh x
x e  e x
k BT N ex
 x N 2 B
N e  e x High T ( x << 1 ): M  N x 
kB T

Curie-Brillouin law:
g J B B
M  N g J  B BJ  x  x
kB T

Brillouin
function:
2J 1   2 J  1 x  1  x 
BJ  x   ctnh    ctnh  
2J  2 J  2 J  2 J 
g J B B
M  N g J  B BJ  x  x
kB T

2J 1   2 J  1 x  1  x 
BJ  x   ctnh   ctnh  
2J  2 J  2 J  2 J 
1 x x3
High T ( x << 1 ): ctnh x    
x 3 45

M N J  J  1 g  B N p 2  B2 C
2 2
 Curie
  
B 3 k BT 3 k BT T law

= effective number
pg N J  J  1 of Bohr magnetons

Gd (C2H3SO4)  9H2O
Rare Earth Ions

Lanthanide
contraction

ri = 1.11A

ri = 0.94A

Perturbation from higher states


4f radius ~ 0.3A significant because splitting
between L-S multiplets ~ kB T
Hund’s Rules
For filled shells, spin orbit couplings do not change order of levels.

Hund’s rule ( L-S coupling scheme ):


Outer shell electrons of an atom in its ground state should assume
1.Maximum value of S allowed by exclusion principle.
2.Maximum value of L compatible with (1).
3.J = | L−S | for less than half-filled shells.
J = L + S for more than half-filled shells.

Causes:
1. Parallel spins have lower Coulomb energy.
2. e’s meet less frequently if orbiting in same direction (parallel Ls).
3. Spin orbit coupling lowers energy for LS < 0.

Mn2+: 3d 5 (1) → S = 5/2 exclusion principle → L = 2+1+0−1−2 = 0


2
Ce3+: 4f1 L = 3, S = ½ (3) → J = | 3− ½ | = 5/2 F5/2
3
Pr3+: 4f2 (1) → S = 1 (2) → L = 3+2 = 5 (3) → J = | 5− 1 | = 4 H4
Iron Group Ions

L=0
Crystal Field Splitting

Rare earth group: 4f shell lies within 5s & 5p shells


→ behaves like in free atom.
Iron group: 3d shell is outer shell
→ subject to crystal field (E from neighbors).
→ L-S coupling broken-up; J not good quantum number.
Degenerate 2L+1 levels splitted ; their contribution to moment diminished.
Quenching of the Orbital Angular Momentum
Atom in non-radial potential → Lz not conserved.
If  Lz  = 0, L is quenched.
μ   B L  2S  L is quenched → μ is quenched

L = 1 electron in crystal field of orthorhombic symmetry ( α = β = γ = 90, a  b  c ):

e   A x2  B y 2  C z 2  2  0  A B C  0 → e   Ax 2  By 2   A  B  z 2

Consider wave functions: U j  xj f  r → L 2 U j  L  L  1 U j  2 U j

d rU Uj
3 *
For i  j, the integral i is odd in xi & xj , and hence vanishes.

i.e., Ui e  U j  i j Ui e  Ui

U x e  U x   d 3r f  r   A x 4  B x 2 y 2   A  B  x 2 z 2   A  I1  I 2 
2

I1   d 3r f  r  I 2   d 3r f  r 
2 2
where x 4j xi2 x 2j

Similarly Uy e Uy  B  I1  I 2  U z e  U z    A  B   I1  I 2 
 Uj are eigenstates for the atom in crystal field.

Orbital moments are zero since U j Lz U j 0 Quenching

For lattice with cubic symmetry,

e   A  x2  y2  z 2   2  0  A0

 there’s no quadratic terms in e φ .

→ Ground state remains triply degenerate.


Jahn-Teller effect: energy of ion is lowered by spontaneous lattice distortion.
E.g., Mn3+ & Cu2+ or holes in alkali & siver halides.
Spectroscopic Splitting Factor
λ = 0 or H = 0 → Uj degenerate wrt Sz.
In which case, let A, B be such that ψ0 = x f(r) α is the ground state, where
α (spin up) and β (spin down) are Pauli spinors.
1st order perturbation due to λ LS turns ψ0 into
   
  U x  i U y   Uz  where 1   y   x 2   z   x
 21  2 2

α | β  = 0 → term Uz β ~ O(λ2) in any expectation values.


 It can be dropped in any 1st approx.

Thus  Lz   
1
  
 z   B  Lz  2S z      1  B
 1 
  
Energy difference between Ux α and Ux β in field B : E  g  B H  2  1    B H
 1 
  
→ g  2 1  
 1 
Van Vleck Temperature-Independent Paramagnetism
Consider atomic or molecular system with no magnetic moment in the ground state , i.e.,
0 z 0  s z s 0

In a weak field μz B << Δ = εs – ε0 ,


B B
0  0  0  s s z 0 s  s  s  0 0 z s
 
B 2
0 z 0  0  z 0  2 s z 0

B 2
s z s  s  z s  2 s z 0

a) Δ << kB T b) Δ >> kB T

N0  N s  N N0  N s  N
2 k BT
2B 2 N 2B 2
M s z 0 M s z 0 N
 2 kB T 
1 2N 2 van Vleck
N s z 0
2
Curie’s
 s z 0 paramagnetism
kB T 
law
Cooling by Isentropic Demagnetization

Was 1st method used to achieve T < 1K.


Lowest limit ~ 10–3 K .
Mechanism: for a paramagnetic system at fixed T, Δ  < 0 as H increases.
i.e., H aligns μ and makes system more ordered.
→ Removing H isentropically (Δ  = 0) lowers T.

Lattice entropy can seeps in


during demagnetization

Magnetic cooling is not cyclic.


Isothermal magnetization

Isoentropic demagnetization
T2

S  k B ln  2S  1  N k B ln  2S  1
N
Spin entropy if all states are accessible:

 is lowered in B field since lower energy states are more accessible.

Population of magnetic sublevels is function of μB/kBT, or B/T.

B B B
 Δ=0→  or T2  T1 BΔ = internal random field
T1 T2 B
Nuclear Demagnetization
B
T2  T1
B
m p ~ 1836 me
5.58
g p ~ 5.58 →  p ~ e ~ 1.52 103  B
2  1836
g n ~ 3.83
T2 = T1 ( 3.1 / B )
→ T2 of nuclear paramagnetic cooling
~ 10–2 that of electronic paramagnetic cooling.

p B
B = 50 kG, T1 = 0.01K, →  0.5
k B T1
B
 6.72 10 5 G / K
kB

Δ on magnetization is over 10% max. →


phonon Δ negligble.
Cu: T1 = 0.012K
102 100G
BΔ =3.1 G T2  0.01K  2 10 7 K
50kG
Paramagnetic Susceptibility of Conduction Electrons
N  B2 B
Classical free electrons: M ~ Curie paramagnetism
k BT

Experiments on normal non-ferromagnetic metals : M independent of T

Pauli’s resolution:
Electrons in Fermi sea cannot flip over due to exclusion principle.
Only fraction T/TF near Fermi level can flip.

N  B2 B T N  B2 B
 M  
k BT TF k B TF
Pauli paramagnetism at T = 0 K

 
T=0 1 F 1 F 1
N   d  D     B    d D      B D   F  parallel moment
2  B 2  B 2

 
1 F 1 F 1
N   d  D     B    d  D      B D   F  anti-parallel moment
2  B 2  B 2

3N  2
M Pauli    N   N     B D F 
2
 B χ > 0 , Pauli paramagnetism
2k BTF

Landau diamagnetism: M Landau N2 N2


 B M  M Pauli  M Landau  B
2k BTF →
2k BTF
χ is higher in transition metals due to higher
Prob. 5 &6

You might also like