Risk Management Process
Risk Management Process
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Learning Objectives
At the end of this session students should be able
to:
• Understand the nature of Risk and Risk
Management
• Understand the Risk Management Process
• Create a risk register to monitor and control risks
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
RISK MANAGEMENT
CONTEXT
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
What is a Risk?
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
The story so far
• Stakeholder Requirements
• Scope
• Cost
• Time
• NOW Risk
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Traditional View
• Minor Risks
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNjcjOE
X_NA
• Major Risks
• http://www.workingwithcrowds.com/crowd-
disasters-year
/
• https://
www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/03
/juventus-fans-injured-turin-square-panic-fi
recrackers
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
What is a Risk?
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Expressing Risk
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
RISK MANAGEMENT
PRINCIPLES
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
What is risk management?
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk Management Procedure
1. Identify
2. Assess
3. Plan
4. Implement
5. COMMUNICATE
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
1. Identify
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
External Influences on Event
Risks Pt 1
• Global Industry Environment
• Events share common characteristics
related to:
• Scale
• Scope
• Infrastructure and facilities requirements
• Resource commitments
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
External Influences on Event
Risks Pt 2
• Country Environment
• Political institutions and institutional design
shape influence the type of risk regulations
• Germany, executive and cooperative
federalism requiring coordination of state
police services (Landespolizei).
• UK, unitary state, competition between
authorities representing London and
National Agencies
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Internal Influences on Event
Risks Pt1
• Number of organizations involved and the
relationship between them
• The needs of the stakeholders involved with the
project
• The importance, complexity and scale of the
project
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Internal Influences on Event
Risks Pt 2
• The organization's own environment (e.g.
legislative or governance requirements)
• The organization's approach to risk
management as described by its risk
management policy
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Internal Influences on Risk:
Project Scope
Event Objective: 100
attendees
risks?
6
5 Delegate
1 Venue 2.Attendees 3 Speakers 4 Publicity Conference
Handouts
Logistics
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Internal Influences on risk:
Schedule
Event Objective: Raise awareness of diversity issues
What are the possible risks?
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
RISK MANAGEMENT
PROCESS
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk Identification Requirements
• Project information:
• Stakeholder Analysis
• Scope
• Product Breakdown Structure
• Schedule
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk identification techniques
• Review lessons: Review similar previous projects to
see what threats and opportunities affected them
• Risk checklists: These are in-house lists of risks that
have either been identified or have occurred on previous
similar projects(Raz & Michael, 2001).
• . Examples:
• http://www.hse.gov.uk/event-safety/getting-started.htm
• http://
www.fmd.qut.edu.au/campus_services/facilities_hire/Event_Safe
ty_Checklist.pdf
• http://
www2.cdc.gov/cdcup/library/checklists/CDC_UP_Risk_Manage
ment_checklist.pdf
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk Identification Techniques
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk Breakdown Structure
• Lists categories and subcategories where
risks may arise Event
Project
Stage Organizational
Management
Limited Design
Funding Estimates
Time
Legal
Prioritization Scheduling
Specifications
Resource
Communication
Availability
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk &Project Stages
Phase Activities Techniques Documents
Initiation/ Strategic risk analysis Strategic risk checklist Initial risk evaluation
Conceptual and evaluation
Phase
Planning Risk management Planning template Risk planning
planning Risk checklist
Risk Risk Indicators‘/Trigger Risk indicators'
Indicators‘/Triggers checklist /triggers list
definition
Setup and Risk Indicators' Risk Indicators' /Triggers list Updated Risk
Staging /Triggers revision indicators' /triggers
Correcting actions Risk planning Updated risk
planning
Closure Project closure Meeting Project results report
decision
Closure report Lessons learned template Lessons learned
approval
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
2. Assess
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Other Risk Estimation
Techniques
• Expected value: This technique quantifies risk by
combining the cost of the risk impact with the
probability of the risk occurring.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
PLANNING RISK RESPONSES
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
3. Plan
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk response categories for
threats
• Avoid :A change is made (e.g., to project scope)
to remove the threat or neutralize its effect on
project objectives. By taking these steps, the
uncertain event can never occur.
• E.g. You can avoid the threat of a poor live performance
by using a recording
• Reduce: Action is taken to reduce either the
probability or the impact of the risk before the risk
occurs.
• E.g Warning labels on food products so that customers
with allergies can make the appropriate choices
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk response categories for
threats
• Fallback: Also referred to as a contingency plan,
the Fallback response is performed only if the
risk occurs, and is therefore reactive rather than
proactive. As a result, it does not affect risk
probability, but mitigates its impact. Examples?
• Transfer: The financial impact of a risk can
partly be transferred to a third party (e.g., by
taking out insurance)
• Accept: This is a conscious decision to do
nothing.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk response categories for
opportunities
• Exploit: Action to force the risk event to
occur.
• Enhance: Proactive response, increasing
either probability or impact of the risk
(direct opposite to ‘Reduce’).
• Reject: A conscious decision to do nothing.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk response category for both
threats and opportunities
• Share: Stakeholders may share the gain if
costs are lower than planned, and the
losses if costs are greater than expected.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
4. Implement
• The primary goal of the 'Implement' step is to ensure that the
planned risk responses are actioned, their effectiveness
monitored, and corrective action taken where responses do not
match expectations.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Risk Register
• The main output of the risk identification process is a list of
identified risks and other information needed to begin
creating a risk register.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
41
Risk Register Contents
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
43
Risk Register
No. Rank Risk Description Category Root Triggers Potential Risk Probability Impact Status
Cause Responses Owner
R44 1
R21 2
R7 3
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
44
BU Risk Register
• You need: PBS, Schedule, Event Scope
• Complete the name, date, venue, type of event being
held and name of the person doing the review and the
date of the review.
• Identify the location(s) involved.
• Identify the potential hazards, i.e. what could happen?
• Hazard Definition:
http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/hazard
_risk.html
• Identify who might be harmed, i.e. the person(s) at risk.
• Describe the control measures already in place to reduce
the risk of this hazard.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
BU Risk Register
• Assess whether the risks are adequately controlled -
Yes/No
• If no, and bearing in mind the control measures already
in place, calculate the residual level of severity of the
potential hazard:
1= Slightly harmful (minor injuries e.g. minor
cuts/bruises)
2 = Harmful (e.g. broken bones or curable conditions)
3 = Extremely harmful (e.g. would cause fatality,
major long-term injuries or conditions)
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
BU Risk Register
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
University Risk Assessment
Grid
SEVERITY
3
2
1
112 3
Likelihood
LIKELIHOOD
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Further Reading
• Hubbard (2009), The Failure of Risk Management, Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-
38795-5
• Jennings, W, & Lodge, M 2011, 'Governing Mega-Events: Tools of Security
Risk Management for the FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany and London
2012 Olympic Games', Government & Opposition, 46, 2, p. 192
• Kerzner, H. (2003), Advanced Project Management: Best Practices on
Implementation, John Wiley & Sons Inc, ISBN: 0471472840
• Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Lazcano, A. M. E., & Villanueva,
P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms.
International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 327-340.
• Raz, T., & Michael, E. (2001). Use and benefits of tools for project risk
management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 9-17.
• Silvers, J. (2008) Risk management for meetings and events [electronic
resource] Amsterdam ; London : Butterworth-Heinemann
www.bournemouth.ac.uk
Further Reading
• Standards
– BS 6079-3: 2000 Guide to the Management of Business related
Project Risk
– BS IEC 62198:2001 Project Risk Management. Application
Guidelines
• Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk
management into project uncertainty management. International
Journal of Project Management,21(2), 97-105.
www.bournemouth.ac.uk