0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views

Facility Layout

Part of the Course Operations Management.

Uploaded by

Vinayak Saxena
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views

Facility Layout

Part of the Course Operations Management.

Uploaded by

Vinayak Saxena
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Facility

Layout

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8–1
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Layout Decisions
• Facility layout: the process of determining placement
of departments, workgroups within departments,
workstations, machines, and stock-holding points
within a facility
• This process requires the following inputs:
– Specification of the objectives used to evaluate the
design
– Estimates of product or service demand
– Processing requirements
– Space requirements for the elements
– Space availability within the facility
8–2
Basic Production Layout

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Formats
• Workcenter (job-shop or functional layout)
– Similar equipment are grouped together.
• Assembly line (flow-shop layout)
– Work processes are arranged according to the steps by
which the product is made.
• Manufacturing cell
– Dissimilar machines are grouped to work on similar
products.
• Project layout
– Product remains at one location.

8–3
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Workcenters
• Given
– The flow (number of moves) to and from all departments
– The cost of moving from one department to another
– The existing or planned physical layout of the plant
• Determine
– The “best” locations for each department, where best
means maximizing flow, which minimizes costs

8–4
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Systematic Layout Planning
• Numerical flow of items between workcenters
– Can be impractical to obtain
– Does not account for the qualitative factors that may be crucial to
the placement decision

• Systematic layout planning


– Accounts for the importance of having each department located
next to every other department
– Is also guided by trial and error
 Switching workcenters then checking the results of the “closeness”
score

8–5
Store
Layout
Systematic

a Floor of a
Department
Planning for

8–6

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Assembly Line

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
• Assembly line: progressive assembly linked by some
material handling device
– Some form of pacing is present and the allowable processing time
is equivalent for all workstations

• Important differences:
– Material handling devices
– Line configuration
– Pacing
– Product mix
– Workstation characteristics
– Length

8–7
Assembly-Line Design

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
• Workstation cycle time: a uniform time interval in which a
moving conveyor passes a series of workstations
– Also the time between successive units coming off the line

• Assembly-line balancing: assigning all tasks to a series of


workstations so that each workstation has no more than can
be done in the workstation cycle time

• Precedence relationship: the order in which tasks must be


performed in the assembly process

8–8
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Assembly-Line Balancing

• Specify the sequential relationships among tasks.


• Determine the required workstation cycle time.
• Determine the theoretical minimum number of
workstations.
• Select a primary and secondary assignment rule.
• Assign tasks.
• Evaluate the efficiency of the balance.
• Rebalance if needed.

8–9
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Assembly-Line Balancing

Production time per day


Cycle time (C) 
Required output per day (in units)
Sum of task time s (T)
Theoretica l minimum (N t ) 
Cycle time (C)
Sum of task time s (T)
Efficiency 
Actual number of workstati ons (N a ) x Worksta tion cycle time (C)

8–10
Example 8.2: Assembly Steps and Times

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–11
Example: Precedence Graph

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–12
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Example: C and Nt
Production time per day 60 sec. x 420 min
C 
Output per day 500 wagons
25,200
  50.4
500
T 195 seconds
Nt    3.87  4
C 50.2 seconds

8–13
t
Example:
Assignmen

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–14
Efficiency 
T

195
N a C 5 50.4 
Example: Efficiency

 0.77  77%

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–15
Task Splitting

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
• Split the task
• Share the task
• Use parallel workstations

• Use a more skilled worker


• Work overtime
• Redesign

8–16
Flexible Line Layouts

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Problem – operators Solution – remove
trapped in “cages” barriers so operators
prevents sharing work can trade work and
among them operators can be
added or removed as
needed

8–17
Flexible Line Layouts

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Problem – operators
“birdcaged” with no
opportunity to share
work or add third
operator Solution – operators
can help each other
and third operator can
be added if needed

8–18
Flexible Line Layouts

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Problem – straight line
is difficult to balance

Solution – U-shaped
line gives better
operator access and
may reduce need for
operators

8–19
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Mixed-Model Line Balancing
• Most factories produce a number of different
products.
– Inventory can be reduced by building some of each
product during every period (e.g., day, week, etc.).

• Mixed-model line balancing is one means of


scheduling this varied production.

8–20
Example 8.3: Mixed-Model Line

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Balancing
• Processing must be completed for both Model J and
Model K wagons.
• Equal number of each model are required.
• Cycle time – 6 minutes for Model J and 4 minutes for
Model K.
• In an 8-hour day, how should the models be processed?

Total Processing Time Because K = J, we


can produce 48 of
  each per day (6 of
each per hour.

8–21
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Example 8.3: Mixed-Model Line Balancing

This approach often requires diligent efforts to reduce setup times and
costs, but can significantly reduce overall inventory levels.

8-22
8–22
Developing a Manufacturing

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Cell

• Grouping parts into families that follow a


common sequence of steps
• Identifying dominant flow patterns of parts
families as a bases for location of processes
• Physically grouping machines and processes
into cells

8–23
Example: Original Workcenter Layout

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–24
Flow of Parts
Example: Routing Matrix Based upon

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–25
Example:

Form Cells
Machines to
Reallocating

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–26
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Manufacturing Cell Benefits
• Better human relations
• Improved operator expertise
• Less in-process inventory and material
handling
• Faster production setup

8–27
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Project Layout
• Is characterized by a relatively low number of production
units.

• Visualize the product as the hub of a wheel with materials


and equipment arranged concentrically around the
production point.

• A high degree of task ordering is common.

• To the extent that this precedence determines production


stages, a project layout might be developed by arranging
materials according to their technological priority.
8–28
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Retail Service Layout
• Goal — maximize net profit per square foot of floor
space
• Servicescapes
– Ambient conditions
 Background characteristics, such as noise
– Spatial layout and functionality
 Planning the circulation path of customers and grouping
merchandise
– Signs, symbols, and artifacts
 Parts of the service that have social significance

8–29
Alternative Store Layouts

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
8–30
Marketing Research and

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Retail Layout
• People in supermarkets tend to follow a perimeter
pattern in their shopping behavior. Placing high-
profit items along the walls of a store will enhance
their probability of purchase.

• Sale merchandise placed at the end of an aisle in


supermarkets almost always sells better than the
same sale items placed in the interior portion of an
aisle.
8–31
Marketing Research and

Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Retail Layout
• Credit and other non-selling departments that
require customers to wait for the completion of
their services should be placed either on upper
floors or in “dead” areas.

• In department stores, locations nearest the


store entrances and adjacent to front window
displays are most valuable in terms of sales
potential.
8–32
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Office Layout
• More open offices

• Low divider walls

• Size and orientation of desks indicates


importance of people behind them
– ServiceMaster (A major janitorial firm) places its
know-how room (tools , manuals) at the center

8–33

You might also like