0% found this document useful (0 votes)
375 views76 pages

DR - O. K. A. Samuels

The document discusses slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), a condition where the femoral epiphysis slips from the metaphysis through the growth plate in adolescents. It covers the history, presentation, classification, imaging, and management of SCFE. Key points include that SCFE typically presents as hip or groin pain in obese adolescents, and can be classified as stable or unstable based on ability to bear weight. Imaging including radiographs and CT can assess severity and guide treatment, which ranges from hip spica casting to in situ fixation with pins or screws to more invasive procedures for unstable cases. Management aims to prevent further slippage while maintaining hip function and avoiding complications like avascular necrosis.

Uploaded by

gdudex118811
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
375 views76 pages

DR - O. K. A. Samuels

The document discusses slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), a condition where the femoral epiphysis slips from the metaphysis through the growth plate in adolescents. It covers the history, presentation, classification, imaging, and management of SCFE. Key points include that SCFE typically presents as hip or groin pain in obese adolescents, and can be classified as stable or unstable based on ability to bear weight. Imaging including radiographs and CT can assess severity and guide treatment, which ranges from hip spica casting to in situ fixation with pins or screws to more invasive procedures for unstable cases. Management aims to prevent further slippage while maintaining hip function and avoiding complications like avascular necrosis.

Uploaded by

gdudex118811
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 76

SUFE

Dr . O. K. A. Samuels
‘when the epiphyses and heads
of the bones are plucked from
the bone whereon they were
placed or fastened; which
unproperly called kind of
luxation, hath place chiefly in

the bones of young people.
And it is known by the
importance of the part and by
the noise and grating
together of the crackling
bones when they are handled.’

Ambroise Pare— 1564


INTRODUCTION
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a well
known disorder of the hip in adolescents that
is characterized by displacement of the capital
femoral epiphysis from the metaphysis
through the physis.

MISNOMER
INTRODUCTION
The deformity is typically
one of superior migration,
adduction and external
rotation of the femoral
neck.

epiphysis displaces
primarily posterior
relative to the
femoral neck.
Valgus
SUFE
Epidemiology and Demographics
0.2 per 100,000 Japan to 10.2 per 100,000 NE USA
Male predominance 60%
Left 60%
 Unilateral 60 %
Average age at diagnosis is 13.5 y M
12.0 y F
Typical range 9- 16 y
Demographics and epidemiology
Majority obese >50% 95th centile weight for age

Presenting age as weight

Relative racial frequency


Whites 1.0
Pacific islanders 4.5
Blacks 2.2
Epidemiology and Demographics
Bilaterality varies 18 – 50 %

Initially 50 % , subsequently 50 %

Higher in blacks ( 34 % )

82% of 2nd slips by 18mths

Younger age
Aetiology
Endocrine or Metabolic ( 5-8 % )

Idiopathic - essentially unknown

multiple theories
Aetiology
Theories - Biomechanical
Biochemical

Final common pathway


-mechanical insufficiency of the proximal
femoral growth plate

physiological load abnormally high loads


across an abnormally across a normal
weak physis physis
Biomechanical Factors

deficiency and abnormality in the


supporting collagenous and
proteoglycan framework of the
physis and perchondral ring

Chondrocyte clustering and


disarray occur in a thickened
hypertrophic zone

proliferative zone demonstrates changes in


proteoglycan and glycoprotein concentrations,
Biomechanical Factors
Obesity
Microtrauma
 increased femoral
retroversion
Shear stressess
 increased physeal
obliquity
Torsional forces
Deeper acetabulum
Biochemical Factors
Puberty - Hormonal changes (gonadotrophins )

Rapid longitudinal growth

increased physiological activity

widening of the physis

Decreased physeal strength


Aetiology
subtle but as yet
undiagnosable
endocrinopathy may be
present.

 A genetic basis for


SUFE has not been
established.

Previous radiation
Aetiology
There have been mixed results implicating an
immunological basis for SUFE.

Some studies have shown increased C3 complement


and immunoglobulins and possibly higher serum IgA
levels.
Aetiology
Hypothyroidism
panhypopituitarism,
Endocrinopathi  growth hormone
abnormality
es hypogonadism
 6 -8 x more Craniopharyngioma
 Hyperparathyroidism (CRF)
80% bilateral MEN II-B
Turner’s syndrome
optic glioma
Presentation and Classification
Preslip
Traditional
Acute
Based on clinical features
Chronic

Acute on chronic
Presentation
Preslip - weakness in the leg

- Limping (painless )

- pain in the groin , thigh or


knee on exertion

-lack of internal rotation


Presentation
Acute Chronic

Symptoms < 3weeks Symptoms > 3 weeks

10 – 15 % 85 %

Inceased risk of AVN in Remissions and


treated cases exacerbations
Presentation
Acute on chronic
- Prodromal symptoms for > 3 weeks

- sudden exacerbation of pain


Examination
Externally rotated attitude
Restriction of flexion, abduction, and internal rotation
Obligatory external rotation on flexion (this is a diagnostic
clue)
Wasting of the thigh in chronic slips
True supratrochanteric shortening (Bryant triangle,
Nélaton line)
Trendelenburg sign and gait possible; antalgic gait in acute
or acute-on-chronic slips
Classification
Stable Unstable

child can walk and bear Unable to walk or bear


weight, with or without weight with or without
crutches crutches

0 % AVN rate
Up to 50% AVN rate
Imaging
Anteriop Frog- lateral (more
sensitive)
osterior
Radiographs
Preslip – essentially a radiographic diagnosis
- widened , irregular, indistinct physis
Radiographs

Metaphysial
Blanch of
Steel
RADIOGRAPHS

Kleins Line

Trethowan’s
Sign

> 2mm
Radiographic Classification
Degree of slip
( Wilson)
percentage of
displacement of the
epiphysis on the width of
the metaphysis
mild, < 33%;
 moderate, 33% to 50%;
severe, >50%
Radiographic Classification
Southwicks
epiphyseal /shaft angle

Mild: the head shaft angle


differs by less than 30.
Moderate: the angle
difference is 30–60.
Severe: the angle
difference is more than 60
Ultrosonographic Classification
Kallio

 ultrasound - absence of metaphyseal remodeling and the


presence of an effusion, an acute event is likely to be
unstable.

 ultrasound - demonstrate metaphyseal remodeling and the


absence of an effusion, an acute event has not occurred, and
the SCFE is considered stable.
CT

Scan
The later management
if joint penetration has
occurred with fixation devices
exact position of Implants
 if the growth plates have closed and
so may help in deciding about
contralateral fixation
3-D images assess residual
deformity of the upper femur when
planning reconstructive osteotomy.
Axial CT scan images also enable
the head–neck angle measurement
Bone Scan and MRI
Limited use

early detection of AVN

Preslip ?
Management
Goals - early detection

- prevention of further slippage

- maintain or regain hip function

- avoidance of complications
Management
Controversies
Management – (Stable/Chronic )
Hip-spica cast immobilization
In situ stabilization with single or multiple pins or
screws
Open epiphysiodesis with autograft or allograft bone
Open reduction with a corrective osteotomy through
the physis and internal fixation with use of multiple
pins
Compensatory basilar neck osteotomy with in situ
stabilization with multiple-pin fixation
Intertrochanteric osteotomy with internal fixation
Hip spica
ADVANTAGES

It avoids the complications


of anesthesia and surgery

It also provides


prophylactic treatment for
the opposite hip
Hip spica
DISADVANTAGES
The hip-spica cast does not
stabilize the SCFE
reported progression of the
slip in 5-10% of patients
chondrolysis rates appears to
be higher than with surgical
treatment.
It is cumbersome, especially if
obese
 restricts mobility
 It can also cause cast sores.
In situ stabilization
stable or chronic mild and moderate slips (85%)

No formal manipulation

postoperative remodeling occurs

the loss of internal rotation of the hip in most


patients is not clinically relevant (Bellmans JPO
1996)
Key Points
 anterior entry site on
the neck, appropriate for
the degree of slip;
 no crossing of the
physis until bi-planar
alignment is achieved;
the pin is in the
epiphysis and NOT in
the joint by multiplanar
radiographic evaluation.
Key Points
started on the lateral
entered the epiphysis in
the posterosuperior
quadrant,
which jeopardized the
blood supply to the
femoral head
lateral epiphyseal vessels
Key Points
Ideal screw position.

the central axis of the


screw is located over
the center line of the
femoral head or within a
distance equal to
one-half the diameter of
the screw
Outcome
results of single-screw fixation in patients with SCFE have
been gratifying

rates of slippage and complications are low (Aronson DD,


Loder 1992 , Ward 1992 , Stevens 1996 ,Anand A, Chorney
GS 2007 )
Outcome
CONTROVERSY - multiple vs single screws
the gain in stiffness with a second screw may not offset
the increased risk of complications (Karol JPO 1992)
incidence of pin-related complications was directly
related
the number of pins or screws (Blanco et. al 1992 )
Open Epiphyseodesis with Iliac
Crest or Allogeneic Bone Graft
iliofemoral approach.
 rectangular window of bone is
removed from the anterior
aspect of the femoral neck.
 A cylindrical tunnel is created
across the physis,
multiple corticocancellous
strips of iliac crest bone graft
are driven into the tunnel
across the proximal femoral
physis
 promote early closure of the
physis
Advantages Disadvantages
The risk of damaging the The fixation afforded by
vascularity of the femoral bone graft is not as solid
head is reduced
as that provided by pins.
The risk of joint penetration
A risk of additional
is also reduced.
It avoids the complications of slippage remains.
internal fixation, including The surgery and
unrecognized pin anaesthesia is longer.
penetration and hardware Blood loss is increased.
failure.
It provides rapid, reliable The incision is larger.
closure of the physis. A spica cast is needed.
Unstable SUFE

CONTROVERSAL
UNSTABLE SUFE
 many investigators recommend internal fixation
the timing of fixation
the role of preoperative traction
 the role of open reduction / surgical hip dislocation
Role of decompression (open vs aspiration )
 the number of screws used for fixation
Examine the Evidence
Tomkakova and Stanton (
JBJS 2004 )
Maeda et. al. ( JPO 2001 )
Gordon et. al ( JPO 2002)
Herrera-soto (JPO 2008)
Parsch et. al (JPO 2009 )
Chen et. al (JPO 2009)
Palocaren (JPO 2010)
Examine the evidence
Their good results were attributed to
arthrotomy and decompression of the joint along with
open reduction and internal fixation
 within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms.
2 screws VS 1 screw vs smooth pins ?
NWB for 6-8 weeks
Surgical Dislocation
Severe SUFE

Controversial
Severe SUFE
Persistent femoral
retrovertion

Femeroacetabular
impingement

Early osteoarthritis
SEVERE SUFE
In situ pinning can often be very difficult if not
impossible.
An attempt at in situ fixation can be undertaken
accepting that there will be a functional deficit,
 depending on the age at presentation, limited
remodelling potential.
SEVERE SUFE
The role of osteotomy in the treatment of SCFE is controversial
regarding indications, timing, and type of osteotomy.

osteotomy should be performed as the initial treatment in SCFE .


an attempt to improve the joint anatomy
and prevent further slippage and later complications.

osteotomies should be considered only after physeal closure and


assessment of the patient’s function and hip rotation
Osteotomies
Anatomically
(A) subcapital (Dunn or
Fish);
(B) basal neck (Kramer
or Barmada et al.);
(C) intertrochanteric
(Southwick or
Imhauser).
Osteotomies
The closer to the epiphysis the osteotomy, the
greater is the risk of AVN,

 Frymoyer’s reporting 0% AVN using the


Southwick procedure compared with up to 30% for
subcapital osteotomies.

 However, the subcapital osteotomy gives the


highest degree of correction.
Subcapital osteotomy
Technically demanding

Potential complications
(AVN rate )

Avoid posterior neck

Open physis (Dunn )


Basal Neck
compensating closing
wedge

corrects the varus and


retroversion of the slip

theoretically preserving
the blood supply to the
head.
Intertrochanteric Osteotomy
generally used after closure
of the physis.
Southwick - describes a tri-
planar osteotomy
incorporating valgus, flexion
and internal rotation of the
distal segment to restore
proximal femoral alignment
Imhauser - described a bi-
planar osteotomy with
flexion and internal rotation
of the distal portion.
Prophylactic Pinning of Contralateral Hip
commonly accepted In children who have

 underlying endocrine or metabolic disorders,


prophylactic fixation of the uninvolved hip
should be strongly considered

Aim to prevent slippage (especially a severe and or


unstable slip)
Prophylactic pinning
two options:

Prophylactic fixation of the opposite hip

observation with close clinical and radiographic


follow-up.
Prophylactic Pinning
advise using sound clinical judgment with respect to
patient

age, sex, and endocrine status

considering the preferences of the patient and family


Prophylactic Pinning
AAOS Annual Meeting 2010
Based on the literature it seems reasonale to pin
the opposite hip when
Absolute - endocrinopathy or metabolic disorder
Relative - chronologic age < 9 girls , <11 boys
- ethnicity
- high physeal slope
Complications
Avascular necrosis
 Chondrolysis
Degenerative Joint disease

. Other complications
such as implant failure, growing off the screw, slip
progression, proximal femoral fracture,
femoral neck fracture, and leg length discrepancy.
Avascular Necrosis
FACTORS
an acute unstable SUFE
overreduction of an acute SUFE
 attempts at reduction of the chronic
component of an acute-on-chronic SUFE
placement of pins in the superolateral quadrant of the
femoral head
increased if a cuneiform or basilar neck osteotomy is
performed prior to physeal closure.
AVN
Management
non–weight bearing with
crutches, range-of-motion exercises,
and anti-inflammatory medication.
An internal fixation device that protrudes into the
joint should be repositioned in the epiphysis if the
physis is open, or removed if the physis is closed.
Salvage
Re-directional
osteotomies,
vascularised fibular grafting
standard bone grafting procedures have been
attempted in children
there are no convincing outcome studies.
Total hip arthroplasty
Chondrolysis
Acute necrosis of the articular cartilage

Risk factors for chondrolysis are:


1. cast immobilisation
2. unrecognised permanent pin penetration
3. severe slip
4. prolonged symptoms before treatment
Chondrolysis
It usually presents with pain and stiffness
 the hip being held in flexion, external rotation and
abduction.
X-rays reveal a loss of joint space,
the criterion for diagnosis being a loss of more than
50% of the joint space compared to the other hip
or an absolute measurement of 3mm or less.
Chrondrolysis
Presentation is usually between 6 weeks and 4 months
after treatment of SUFE.

Progressive joint space narrowing occurs between 6


and 12 months.
Chrondrolysis
Treatment of chondrolysis is largely supportive.

Firstlyinfection must be ruled out.

Secondly, a CT scan of the hip to ensure that penetration of the


jointhas not occurred.

 If penetration has occurred then the screw should be removed, or


replaced if the physis has not closed.

Patients who do not recover adequate movement or whohave severe


continued pain may require arthrodesis or arthroplasty.

You might also like