Some Particular Assessment and Evaluation Challenges For Teachers
Social studies assessment presents unique challenges as it encompasses diverse ways of thinking and learning. Key outcomes like critical thinking and citizenship are difficult to define and may not be evident until students leave school. Sound social studies assessment begins with understanding what students should know and be able to do, identifying clear evidence of learning, and designing instruction accordingly. Teachers must carefully consider what is being assessed, its purpose, appropriate tools, and how the data will be used when planning effective social studies evaluation.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
138 views9 pages
Some Particular Assessment and Evaluation Challenges For Teachers
Social studies assessment presents unique challenges as it encompasses diverse ways of thinking and learning. Key outcomes like critical thinking and citizenship are difficult to define and may not be evident until students leave school. Sound social studies assessment begins with understanding what students should know and be able to do, identifying clear evidence of learning, and designing instruction accordingly. Teachers must carefully consider what is being assessed, its purpose, appropriate tools, and how the data will be used when planning effective social studies evaluation.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
SOME PARTICULAR ASSESSMENT AND
EVALUATION CHALLENGES FOR SOCIAL
STUDIES TEACHERS Social studies present some unique challenges for assessment and evaluation. Social studies includes many ways of thinking and knowing: from the narrative of history and the mathematical and statistical reasoning of economics, to the visual and graphic components of geographic study and the deep understanding of differing perspectives and beliefs underlying the study of public issues and current affairs. Even within a single social studies discipline, the kinds of learning to be assessed cover a wide range. Many key social studies outcomes such as; • critical thinking, • social responsibility, • and informed decision-making are hard to define compared to outcomes from other subjects. Furthermore, some of these complex goals such as the development of responsible citizenship may not be evident until after students have left school and engaged in tasks such as informed voting, social action, and other forms of civic participation. HOW DO I PLAN FOR SOUND ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION? Sound assessment begins with the learner in mind. This “backwards design” or “design down” process requires we: (1) determine what the learner needs to know and or do as a result of the learning; (2) identify clear evidence of learning; and (3) design instruction so that students will have opportunities to learn and demonstrate their learnings. Good teachers will keep the following questions in mind when planning for assessment. 1. What is to be assessed? Assessment instruments should be valid; that is, they should provide information about specific, clearly defined elements of students’ knowledge or skills. In order to design appropriate methods of assessment, teachers must be very clear about exactly what it is they want information on. 2. What is the purpose of the assessment? The means of collecting information and reporting on it will vary depending on whether the purpose of the assessment is formative—to provide information for the student and teacher to use to monitor or improve progress—or summative—to provide end-point information for students, parents, and/or administrators. 3. What assessment tools will best provide the information we need? Tools will vary depending on what is to be assessed and the purpose of the assessment. For example, an essay might not be the best way to assess students’ ability to work with scale and symbols on a map, but an exercise requiring them to plan the best route between two points might work well for this purpose. 4. What form will the data take? A teacher might ask students to compare and contrast, for example Napoleon’s and Hitler’s invasions of Russia. Allowing students to present their report in written, oral, or graphic form. In the case of students who have difficulty writing, the latter two forms might provide better information about their facility with the skill being evaluated. 5. Who will collect the data: teachers, students, or outside judges? Involving students in self- or peer-assessment can be a very effective teaching and assessment technique. Asking students to use a checklist to rate their peers’ performance in a debate by collecting data on several criteria (content, presentation, argument, etc) both directs the students to pay specific attention to these important criteria (teaching) and provides information on how well they understand them (assessment). 6. How often and when will the data be collected? Teachers assess students all the time. Giving formal written tests to students every day will probably not prove effective. Provide timely and frequent corrective feedback. 7. What will be done with the data making up the assessment? We assess for different purposes and, depending on the purpose, different things will be done with the data. If the assessment is formative the data needs to be provided to the students involved in an understandable way so they can use it to monitor and improve their progress. On the other hand, if the assessment is summative, information needs to be provided to the relevant people about student achievement. In the case of large-scale international assessments, for example, the information gathered is of little use to individual students who have probably moved on to the next grade or graduated before the results are even available. It is valuable, however, for curriculum planners, administrators, and teachers in understanding the degree to which particular groups of students are meeting the objectives assessed. • Underpinning all these questions, of course, is the principle that our assessments must align with curriculum outcomes. Constraining our use of the full range of techniques and tools is our ability to manage, assess, and teach at the same time. So manageability is a factor in our assessment planning decisions. No one can do it all, even the most skilful of teachers! So we should strive to be fair by taking advantage of the many informal opportunities for assessment, such as simply watching our students while they work and giving them opportunities to reflect on their own learning. Such opportunities are built into sound lesson planning. With good instruction we are well on our way to making those first steps towards assessment literacy. • Is sound assessment easy? No, but nothing of value is. Even if we have useful answers for all of the above questions, they will not be perfect answers for all students on all occasions. We will now turn to an examination of some of the specific assessment and evaluation tools that might be helpful in teaching social studies.