0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views21 pages

Research Methodology - Session2

The document provides information on conducting a literature review for research methodology. It discusses that a literature review critically analyzes existing research on a topic to provide clarity on the current state of knowledge and any gaps. It also explains that a literature review justifies proposed research by demonstrating that the research fills existing gaps in knowledge and adds new understanding. Additionally, the document outlines the process of conducting a literature review, which includes searching relevant literature sources and then thoroughly reviewing the literature.

Uploaded by

Shahrukh Patel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views21 pages

Research Methodology - Session2

The document provides information on conducting a literature review for research methodology. It discusses that a literature review critically analyzes existing research on a topic to provide clarity on the current state of knowledge and any gaps. It also explains that a literature review justifies proposed research by demonstrating that the research fills existing gaps in knowledge and adds new understanding. Additionally, the document outlines the process of conducting a literature review, which includes searching relevant literature sources and then thoroughly reviewing the literature.

Uploaded by

Shahrukh Patel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Research Methodology: Session 2

LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature Review

A literature review is a critical analysis of existing


research related to a specific topic.

This leads to clarity on, state of knowledge, as well


as, gap/s in the knowledge.
Literature Review

 Review of existing literature is a one of the essential preliminary

task when undertaking research work


 Review of literature can be time consuming as well as frustrating

at times
 However, review of literature is rewarding for following reasons:

 it is the platform on which argument (in turn the research


problem) is built, research is justified and it is demonstrated
how research improves the chosen discipline
Justification of Research

Literature review leads to justification of research


 Helps showing that there are gaps in knowledge in field that merit a
closer investigation 
 Demonstrate that proposed research work will fill this gap by adding
knowledge in and understanding of field
 Demonstrate that proposed work hasn't been previously done
 Ensures intellectual contribution is indeed original
 Demonstrates that theories or methodologies in the field have been
critiqued
 Helps justify the arguments related to the proposed research problem
Purpose of Literature Review
Good vs Bad Literature Review

A ‘good’ literature review….. A ‘poor’ literature review is…..

….. is a synthesis of available research …..an annotated bibliography


….. is a critical evaluation ….. confined to description
….. has appropriate breadth and depth ….. narrow and shallow
….. has clarity and conciseness ….. confusing and longwinded
….. uses rigorous and consistent ….. constructed in an arbitrary way
methods
Critique

 Critique is a systematic way of reviewing, critically, the literature


(published research paper) to highlight both strengths and
weaknesses.
 To be critical means to question the information and opinions
presented in the research paper

 To evaluate or judge overall worth of the research and its


findings presented in the paper.

 To critique does not mean to criticize in an exclusively negative


manner.
Importance of Critique WRT Literature Review

 Writing a critical literature review is not about finding fault with


the work of other scholars.
 Critical literature review OR Critique involves accurate reporting
of the central findings and arguments of other scholars in the
chosen discipline.

 Leads to assessment about the extent to which existing research


addresses the research problem.

 A not so critical literature review leads to failure in reporting of


the key findings in the chosen discipline.
Process of Literature Review

The process involves

1. Searching for literature

2. Reviewing the literature


1. Searching for Literature

 To set parameters for the search need to have some idea of:

 broad subject area


 Problem to be investigated
 Source for literature include:

 Journals and Periodicals: information is updated


 Books and Reports: while in detail, information might not be
updated
 Internet: while easy and fast, authenticity of information needs
to be verified
2. Reviewing the Literature

Read the literature thoroughly and critically to determine whether:


 theories put forward, their basis, the methodologies adopted
have been confirmed beyond doubt

 findings can be generalized to other situations

 there are significant differences of opinion among researchers


and critique about the validity of these differences
 any gaps that exist in the body of knowledge i.e determine the
areas in which very little or nothing is known
2. Reviewing the Literature

Review of literature provides answer to:


 stated aim, objectives / purpose of research
 central findings of research
 implication drawn from the findings
 contribution of research domain knowledge
 which aspect of proposed research (or problem) are spoken about
 comparison of research findings with other perspectives/findings
 broad areas of agreement and disagreement
 further research required to contribute to filling the gaps in research
knowledge
Steps in Literature Review

STEP 1: Summarize the argument, the method/s, the


methodology/s, the finding, and their implications.
for e.g.
The study concludes/shows that …
The key finding of the research is …
The authors propose/argue that …
(the key finding that) … has implications for …
The implications of the main finding is …
This suggests/implies that ...
Steps in Literature Review

STEP 2: Summarize the summaries. Write few sentences that tell


the reader what researchers in the field have found or argued on
the broad focus area of research.
for e.g.
Numerous studies (see for example, reference, reference,
reference) have shown that … (key finding).
It is now well accepted that …. (key finding) (reference,
reference, reference).
The conclusion that …. (key findings) … has led to an approach
in which … (implications).
Steps in Literature Review

STEP 2:
for e.g.

The increasing interest in … has heightened the need for …

Of particular interest is …

Recently, there has been growing interest in the field of … in …

The development of … has led … to the hope that …


Steps in Literature Review

STEP 2:
for e.g.

… has become a favourite topic of analysis in the field/s of …

The study of … has become an important aspect of …

A central issue in (field of scholarship) is …

The question of … has been extensively studied in recent years.

Many recent studies have focused on …


Steps in Literature Review

STEP 3: Mention that gap exists and proposed focus has received
less attention, has not been investigated from a particular
perspective, or remains contested or uncertain in some way.
for e.g.
While the focus of (existing research work/s) … has been widely
examined, less attention has been given to … (proposed research
area)

It is now clear that (overall findings or arguments of the field in


relation to the problem area or focus) … but questions about …
(proposed research area) remain.
Steps in Literature Review

STEP 4: Summarize the main point of theme papers or books on


the precise area of proposed research.

for e.g.
Of those studies which have looked directly at ... the focus has
been on ...

The study by .... showed that ...

The methodology adopted in these studies led to more


consideration given to ... than to ...
Steps in Literature Review

STEP 5: Write the aim of the proposed research.

for e.g.

This research will …

The aim of this study is to …


Assessment of Literature Review

 Have you clearly signaled the discipline your research or practice is situated within?

 Is your literature review comprised mainly of a review of scholarly texts published


in academic journals and books in your discipline?
 Have you mainly reported the main finding or central argument of books
and journal articles (or central themes for reporting artifacts)?
 Have you cited, appropriately, where you have borrowed an idea, finding or
argument?
 Have you used the appropriate research language?

 Have you explained how your research or practice will contribute to literature in


your discipline area?
Paradox

You cannot undertake an effective literature review unless


you have formulated a research problem, yet your
literature search plays an extremely important role in
helping you to formulate your research problem

You might also like