Simple and Critical Reading: Prepared By: Jovelyn L. Espino
This document discusses the differences between simple and critical reading. Simple reading involves recognizing what a text says and restating key points, while critical reading involves analyzing what the text does through examples, arguments, appeals, etc. and inferring what the text means based on this analysis. The document provides an example text and questions to practice critical reading skills. It also discusses components of critical thinking like main ideas, summarizing, analyzing sequences of ideas, and more. The document provides guidance on underlining key ideas, boxing important phrases, noting unfamiliar words, and answering questions about a text. It emphasizes the importance of critical reading and formulating evaluative statements with evidence to support judgments.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
473 views25 pages
Simple and Critical Reading: Prepared By: Jovelyn L. Espino
This document discusses the differences between simple and critical reading. Simple reading involves recognizing what a text says and restating key points, while critical reading involves analyzing what the text does through examples, arguments, appeals, etc. and inferring what the text means based on this analysis. The document provides an example text and questions to practice critical reading skills. It also discusses components of critical thinking like main ideas, summarizing, analyzing sequences of ideas, and more. The document provides guidance on underlining key ideas, boxing important phrases, noting unfamiliar words, and answering questions about a text. It emphasizes the importance of critical reading and formulating evaluative statements with evidence to support judgments.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25
SIMPLE AND CRITICAL READING
Prepared by: Jovelyn L. Espino
SHARE YOUR INSIGHTS
“Believe what you like, but
don’t believe everything you read without questioning it,” by Pauline Baynes DIFFERENCE Simple or Non-critical reading is satisfied with recognizing what a text says and restating the key remarks. Critical reading goes two steps further. Having recognized what a text says, it reflects on what the text does by making such remarks. Is it offering examples? Arguing? Appealing for sympathy? Making a contrast to clarify a point? Critical readers then infer what the text means based on the earlier analysis. SIMPLE AND CRITICAL READING EXAMPLE: “My ultimate goal is to be at peace with myself, eliminate toxic feelings, elements and energies from my life, unlearn negative and harmful practices and thought patterns, stop checking for people that don’t check for me, create a space for myself that is nurturing for growth so that I may generate loving energy for myself and others.” TRY ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS:
1. What is the message of the text?
2. Do you feel that this piece is applicable to you? How? 3. Who do you think is speaking in the text? 4. What is the purpose/aim of this text? How do you know? Will this influence others? USING YOUR ARTICLE, DO THE FOLLOWING:
1. Underline the key ideas (e.g. topic sentence),
2. Box phrases you want to remember, 3. Place asterisks on important ideas, 4. And write question marks on unfamiliar references or words. ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
1. What is the key idea of your articles/studies?
2. What issue is the writer focusing on? 3. Does the writer take a clear stand on the issue? 4. What are the supporting statements or evidences the writer presented? 5. Give us the unfamiliar references or words you took note on. 6. What do you think is the writer’s purpose [for writing that article]? 7. What is the writer’s tone? Why do you think we need to read critically? COMPONENTS OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN READING CRITICAL THINKING It means making reasoned judgments that are logical and well-thought-out. It is a way of thinking in which you don't simply accept all arguments and conclusions you are exposed to but rather have an attitude involving questioning such arguments and conclusions. It requires wanting to see what evidence is involved to support an argument or conclusion. People who use critical thinking are the ones who say things such as, 'How do you know that? Is this conclusion based on evidence or gut feelings?' and 'Are there alternative possibilities when given new pieces of information?' COMPONENTS OF CRITICAL THINKING
1. Getting the Main Idea 6. Understanding cause and
2. Summarizing effect 3. Analyzing the sequence of 7. Determining fact from ideas opinion 4. Identifying the problem and 8. Inferring solution 9. Drawing conclusion 5. Comparing and Contrasting FORMULATING EVALUATIVE STATEMENT
Statements should be evaluative, not
descriptive. Wherever possible, include specific information which enables strengths and weaknesses to be quantified. Show why something is a strength or shortcoming, rather than just stating the facts. CONVINCE ME! Let’s test your reasoning skills by trying to convince a group of judges through their own reasons based on the situation and the topic assigned to you. 1. There are 4 sets of situations wherein all the groups will take turns to be the judge and to be the participant. For instance, on the first situation, group 1 will be the judge and the remaining three groups will be the ones to give their reasons. 2. For every situation, each group will be given three minutes to brainstorm. 3. After brainstorming, one of the speakers will convince the judges by giving their reasons. 4. After all the speakers have presented, the judge will give their assessment based on the materials and reasons presented by each group. FIRST SITUATION: Jessica wants to have a movie date with her family tonight. Which genre do you think is better to watch? Group 2 – Comedy Group 3 – Drama Group 4 - Horror Group 1 will be the judge SECOND SITUATION: Max wants to buy a drink, which one should he buy? Group 1 – Iced coffee Group 3 – Milk tea Group 4 - Juice Group 2 will be the judge THIRD SITUATION:
Warren wants to buy an anniversary gift for his
girlfriend, what should he get for her? Group 1 – a bouquet of flowers Group 2 – a box of chocolates Group 4 – stuffed toys Group 3 will be the judge FOURTH SITUATION: Shiela is planning to have a get together with her high school friends. Where do you think is the best place to have it? Group 1 – Fine Restaurant Group 2 – Private Resort Group 3 – Shiela’s House Group 4 will be the Judge PROCESS QUESTIONS:
1. What did you feel while doing the
activity? 2. As the participants, how did you come up with your reasons? 3. As the judges, how were you able to make a sound judgment? EVALUATIVE STATEMENTS 1. A way of giving a better explanation to show the strengths and weaknesses of something through writing 2. Presents a valuable judgment based on a set of criteria. 3. Used in giving a sound judgment – a judgement that can be supported by valid reasons or proofs The writer’s way of explaining why a strength is a strength and why a weakness is a weakness based on evidences gathered. TAKE A STAND AND WRITE YOUR EVALUATIVE STATEMENTS ON ANY OF THESE TOPICS 1. Should students be allowed to skip senior high school? 2. Is prom/graduation ball worth it? 3. Does technology make us more alone? 4. Should video games be considered as a sport? 5. Do violent video games make people violent in real life? 6. Do we need art in our lives? 7. Do filtered/Photoshopped images make you feel bad about your own looks? 8. Is there too much pressure on girls to have the “perfect” bodies? PEER EVALUATION Pick a partner and you exchange with your partner the drafted evaluative claim you did in the previous activity. Your partner will serve as your peer evaluator. The peer evaluator is tasked to respond with the following prompts: 1. Does the claim clearly answer the question? Why or why not? 2. Does each of the reasons logically support the claim? If not, how can s/he fix this? 3. Rank the four (or more) reasons according to importance. 1 is the strongest reason and 4 is the least strong reason. REMEMBER THIS…
“To have a strong argument, you also
need to give an opposing point of view or counterclaim. This provides more support for your argument by showing you did thorough research and considered other points of view other than your own.” COUNTERCLAIM Claims made to rebut a previous claim Provides a contrasting perspective to the main argument Evidences/Proofs Details given by the author to support the claim Can include facts and statistics, opinion from experts, personal anecdotes Characteristics of a good evidence: unified, relevant to the central point, accurate, representative or typical CRAFTING A COUNTERCLAIM
With your partner’s work at hand
write a counterclaim to his/her stand. Provide a contrasting perspective to his/her main argument by giving Evidences/Proofs. GROUP ASSIGNMENT 1. Share your finished counterclaims to your group members. 2. Pick and choose 3 best examples of strong claims and counterclaims as well as 3 examples that need improvement.