Reading: Kalpakjian pp.
239-316
2.008
Metal Casting
Outline
Introduction
Process Constraints
Green Sand Casting
Other Processes
Some Facts
First casting: 5000-3000 BC
Bronze, iron age, light metal age?
Versatility
• Many types of metals
• Rapid production
• Wide range of shapes and sizes
• Complex parts as an integral unit
Example – Sand Casting
Example – Die Casting
Example – Investment Casting
Casting Process Physics and
Constraints
Phase Change
• Density
• Solubility
• Diffusion rates
High melting temperature
• Chemical activity
• High latent heat
• Handling
Analysis of Casting Processes
Fluid mechanics for mold filling
Heat transfer for solidification
Thermodynamics, mass transfer and heat
transfer for nucleation and growth
Materials behavior for structure-property
relationships
Mold Filling
Bernoulli’s equation
P v2
h+ + = const.
ρg 2 g
h
v ≅ 2 gh ≈1.5 m/s
Reynold’s number
vDρ
Re = ≈5 ×10 4
μ
• Turbulence
• Injection Molding : Re ~ 10-4
Cooling for Sand Mold
AIR MOLD SOLID LIQUID
Tw
TEMPERATUR
METAL - MOLD
T
INTERFACE
E
MOLD - AIR
T INTERFACE
T0
DISTANCE
Conductivity / Diffusivity
Conductivity (W/mK)
Cu ~ 400, Al ~ 200
Sand ~ 0.5, PMMA ~ 0.2
Sand Casting
sand < metal
Die Casting
tool metal ~ metal
Injection Molding
tool metal > polymer
Solidification Time : Sand Casting
Transient 1-D heat transfer
∂T ∂ 2T
=α s 2
∂t ∂x
Solution
T −TM −x
= erf
To −TM 2 α st
Solidification time
2
⎛V ⎞
ts = C ⎜ ⎟
⎝A⎠
Chvorinov’s rule
Solidification Time : Die Casting
Transient 1-D heat transfer
∂T
mC p =−Ah(T −To )
∂t
Solution
⎛Tinject + ΔTsp −Tmold
mC p ⎞
t= ln⎜ ⎟
Ah ⎜⎝ Teject −Tmold
⎟
⎠
Solidification time
1
⎛V ⎞
ts = C ⎜ ⎟
⎝A⎠
Comparison:
Sand Mold vs Metal Mold
Sand Mold Metal Mold
Sand casting Die casting
ts ~ (V/A)2 ts ~ (V/A)1
Microstructure Formation
Schematic illustration of three basic types of cast structures
(a) Columnar dendritic (b) equiaxed dendritic (c) equiaxed nondendritic
Formation of Dendrites
Liquid
TL
Liq
Temperature
L+S uid T
us
Solid S
So S
+
lidu
L
s
Solid Liquid
Alloying element Mushy zone
Solid Liquid
Mold
wall
Dendrites
Constitutional Supercooling
SOLUTE ENRICHED
LIQUID COMPOSITION
CL* LAYER IN FRONT OF
LIQUID-SOLID
T* CL* INTERFACE
CS* LIQUID
C
SOLID
DISTANCE, x*
(b)
(a)
AL
TU
T LIQUID
S T AC
AL
TU
DS
TEMPERATURE
UI
TEMPERATURE
AC
T LIQ
T
CONSTITUTIONALLY
T* T* SUPERCOOLED
REGION
DISTANCE, x* DISTANCE, x*
(c) (d)
Green Sand Casting
Mechanical
drawing of part
Core halves
Core boxes pasted together Cope pattern plate Drag pattern plate
Cope after ramming with Drag ready Drag after
Cope ready sand and removing pattern, for sand removing
for sand sprue, and risers pattern
Casting as Casting ready
removed from for shippement
Drag with core Cope and drag assembled mold; heat treated
set in place ready for pouring
Green Sand Mold
Dimensional, Thermal and Chemical stability at high T
Size and shape
Wettability by molten metal
Compatibility with binder system
Availability and consistency
Pattern Design Considerations
(DFM)
Shrinkage allowance
Machining allowance
Distortion allowance
Parting line
Draft angle
Typical Shrinkage Allowance
Metal or alloy Shrinkage allowances
mm / m
Aluminum alloy ………………………………...... 13
Aluminum bronze ……………………………...… 21
Yellow brass (thick sections) ………...…....…… 13
Yellow brass (thin sections) …..……...….…...… 13
Gray cast iron (a) …………………………….... 8 - 13
White cast iron ………………………………..….. 21
Tin bronze …………………………………..……. 16
Gun metal …………………………………...… 11 - 16
Lead …………………………………………..…... 26
Magnesium …………………………………..…… 21
Magnesium alloys (25%) ………………………... 16
Manganese bronze …………………………….… 21
Copper-nickel …………………………………….. 21
Nickel …………………………………………….... 21
Phosphor bronze ……………………………… 11 - 16
Carbon steel …………………………………… 16 - 21
Chromium steel ……………………………….….. 21
Manganese steel ……………………………….… 26
Tin …………………………………………….……. 21
Zinc …………………………………………….…... 26
Typical Pattern Machining
Allowance
Allowances, mm
Pattern size, mm Bore Surface Cope side
For cast irons
Up to 152.……………………………….. 3.2 2.4 4.8
152 - 305………………………………… 3.2 3.2 6.4
305 - 510.………………………………... 4.8 4.0 6.4
510 - 915………………………………… 6.4 4.8 6.4
915 - 1524……………………………….. 7.9 4.8 7.9
For cast steels
Up to 152.……………………………….. 3.2 3.2 6.4
152 - 305………………………………… 6.4 4.8 6.4
305 - 510.………………………………... 6.4 6.4 7.9
510 - 915………………………………… 7.1 6.4 9.6
915 - 1524……………………………….. 7.9 6.4 12.7
For nonferrous alloys
Up to 76...……………………………….. 1.6 1.6 1.6
76 - 152..………………………………… 2.4 1.6 2.4
152 - 305………………………………… 2.4 1.6 3.2
305 - 510.………………………………... 3.2 2.4 3.2
510 - 915………………………………… 3.2 3.2 4.0
915 - 1524……………………………….. 4.0 3.2 4.8
Gating System:
Sprue, Runner, and Gate
Rapid mold filling
Minimizing turbulence
Avoiding erosion
Removing inclusions
Controlled flow and thermal conditions
Minimizing scrap and secondary
operations
Riser: Location and Size
Casting shrinkage
Directional solidification
Scrap and secondary operation
Progressive Solidification in Riser
Progressive solidification :
Intermediate
rate
Slow Fast
rate rate
Riser
Temperature gradient
rising toward riser
Directional
solidification
Draft in Pattern
Patterns
Mold
Investment Casting
Wax
pattern
Injection wax or
plastic patterns Ejecting pattern Pattern
assembly
(Tree)
Autoclaved
Heat Heat
Heat Heat
Slurry coating Stucco coating Completed Pattern meltout
mold
Investment Casting (cont.)
Casting Pattern
Finished product
Shakeout
Pouring
Advantages of Investment Casting
Intricate geometry
Close dimensional tolerance
Superior surface finish
High-melting point alloys
Die Casting
Platen Toggle clamp
Gas/oil accumulator
Piston
Shot sleeve
Die
Advantages of Die Casting
High production rates
Closer dimensional tolerances
Superior surface finish
Improved mechanical properties
Lost Foam Casting
Lost Foam Casting
Receive raw polystyrene beads Invest assembly in flask
with backlip medium
Expand beads Vibrate to compact medium
Mold component pattern, Pour
including gating system
Shakeout castings
Join patters (if multipiece)
Clean castings assembly
Coat pattern assembly Inspect castings
Dry assembly Ship castings
Advantages of Lost Foam Casting
No parting line
No cores
One-piece flask
Freedom of design
Minimum handling of sand
Ease of cleaning and secondary
operation
Semi-solid Casting
Punch
Die
Induction
furnace
Advantages of Semi-solid Casting
Casting Process Comparison
Cost - Casting
Sand casting
Tooling and equipment costs are low
Direct labor costs are high
Material utilization is low
Finishing costs can be high
Investment casting
Tooling costs are moderate depending on the complexity
Equipment costs are low
Direct labor costs are high
Material costs are low
Die casting
Tooling and equipment costs are high
Direct labor costs are low to moderate
Material utilization is high
Quality - Casting
Sand casting
Tolerance (0.7~2 mm) and defects are affected by shrinkage
Material property is inherently poor
Generally have a rough grainy surface
Investment casting
Tolerance (0.08~0.2 mm)
Mechanical property and microstructure depends on the
method
Good to excellent surface detail possible due to fine slurry
Die casting
Tolerance (0.02~0.6 mm)
Good mechanical property and microstructure due to high
pressure
Excellent surface detail
Rate - Casting
Sand casting
Development time is 2~10 weeks
Production rate is depending on the cooling time : t~(V/A)2
Investment casting
Development time is 5~16 weeks depending on the complexity
Production rate is depending on the cooling time : t~(V/A)2
Die casting
Development time is 12~20 weeks
Production rate is depending on the cooling time : t~(V/A)1
Flexibility - Casting
Sand casting
High degree of shape complexity (limited by pattern)
Investment casting
Ceramic and wax cores allow complex internal
configuration but costs increase significantly
Die casting
Low due to high die modification costs
New Developments in Casting
Computer-aided design
Rapid (free-form) pattern making