1
KKD 3103
HUMAN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
THE FINAL PASSAGE
Chapter 16
[email protected]
[email protected]
OUTLINE
2
1) Socialcultural definitions of death
2) Legal and medical definitions
3) Ethical issues
4) A life-course approach to dying
5) Dealing with one’s own death
6) Death anxiety
7) Creating a final scenario
OUTLINE (continue)
3
8) The hospice option
9) The grief process
10) Normal grief reactions
11) Coping with grief
12) Complicated or prolonged grief disorder
13) Dying and bereavement experiences across
the lifespan
[1] SOCIOCULTURAL DEFINITIONS OF DEATH
4
Cultures differ in how they view and deal with
death
Criteria for a “good” vs. “bad” death
Funeral customs
Death icons
Mourning and bereavement rituals
The “afterlife”
How do you view death?
Legal and Medical Definitions
5
Clinical death: lack of heartbeat and respiration
traditionally signified death
Today, whole brain death is required
No spontaneous movement to stimulation; no
spontaneous respiration for more than one hour
Lack of response to even extreme pain
No eye movements
Legal and Medical Definitions (cont’d.)
6
No swallowing, yawning, or vocal or postural activity
No motor reflexes
A flat EEG for at least 10 minutes
No change in any of these after a 24-hour retest
Legal and Medical Definitions: Requirements
7
All eight criteria must be met
Must rule out conditions mimicking death
In most hospitals, the lack of brain activity must
extend to the brainstem (vegetative functions) and
cortex (higher processes)
Persistent vegetative state: irreversible lack of
cortical functioning, but continued brainstem
activity
Cannot be ruled dead
Presents ethical dilemmas
[2] ETHICAL ISSUES
8
Bioethics: study of interface between human values
and technological advances in the health and life
sciences
Grew out of respect for individual freedom and the
difficulty of establishing what is moral through
common sense or rational argument
Decisions must:
Honor the importance of individual choice
Weigh a treatment’s relative benefit vs. harm to a patient
Euthanasia
9
Euthanasia: merciful ending of life
Poses the moral dilemma of deciding under which
circumstances to end a person’s life
Must consider the morality of “killing” a person vs.
“letting” the person die
Dilemma often arises when the person
is being kept alive by a machine
suffers from a terminal illness
Active and Passive Euthanasia
10
Active euthanasia: deliberately ending life (e.g., by a
drug overdose)
Based on person’s clear statement of this desire; made by
someone in legal authority
Passive euthanasia: allowing a person to die by not
giving available treatment (e.g., withholding a cancer
patient’s chemotherapy)
Validity of this distinction is actively debated
Both raise moral and religious concerns and are highly
politicized
Physician-Assisted Suicide
11
Oregon and Washington passed laws allowing
physician-assisted suicide
Require physicians to inform of terminal illness and
to describe alternative options
Give people the right to self-administer lethal doses
obtained by prescription
Require people to be mentally competent, to make
two oral requests separated by 15 or more days, and
to make a written request
[4] A LIFE-COURSE APPROACH TO DYING
12
The shift from formal-operational to postformal
thinking helps young people integrate
emotions/thoughts about death
Parents’ death helps middle-aged adults think about
their own death
Older adults are generally less anxious about death and
accept it more
Attachment theory is the best framework for
understanding how adults deal with death and how
they grieve
[5] DEALING WITH ONE’S OWN DEATH
13
Dying “trajectories” vary across diseases, causing
different reactions to impending death
Diseases such as cancer may have a terminal phase in
which a patient may be able to predict and prepare for
death
Some diseases that do not have a terminal phase may
create a condition in which a person’s death could
occur at any time
Kübler-Ross’s Theory
14
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross pioneered stages in the
dying process beginning with her 1960s’ interviews
with terminally ill patients, who
Were not always told they were dying
Experienced five distinct emotional reactions
The five reactions can overlap, unfold in different
sequences; there are individual differences in each
stage’s duration and each emotion’s intensity
Kübler-Ross’s Stages of Dying
15
Denial: shock, disbelief
Anger: hostility, resentment (“Why me?”)
Bargaining: looking for a way out
Depression: no longer able to deny, patients
experience sorrow, loss, guilt, and shame
Acceptance: acceptance of death’s inevitability
with peace and detachment
Discussion of death helps to move toward
acceptance
A Contextual Theory of Dying
16
Stage theories do not state what moves a person
through the stages
There is no single correct way to die
People vary in how they approach Corr’s four
“tasks” or issues for the dying
Bodily needs
Psychological security
Interpersonal attachments
Spiritual energy and hope
[6] DEATH ANXIETY
17
Death anxiety: diffuse anxiety about death
Terror management theory: our deeply rooted fear
of mortality makes not dying the primary motive
underlying all behaviors
Older adults represent existential threats to younger
and middle-aged adults
Death anxiety consists of several components
Men have more death anxiety than women
Women are more fearful of the dying process
Learning to Deal with Death Anxiety
18
Enjoy what you do have without many regrets
Adolescent risk-taking is correlated with less death
anxiety
Increasing one’s death awareness (e.g., writing
one’s obituary, planning one’s funeral)
Death education can significantly reduce fear
Presents factual information about death, dying, and
advanced directives; increases sensitivity to others
dealing with death
[7] CREATING A FINAL
19
SCENARIO
End-of-life issues: discussing and formalizing
management of life’s final phases, after-death
disposition of one’s body, and lawful distribution of
assets (e.g., through a will)
Baby-boomers are far more proactive and matter-of-
fact about these issues
Final scenario: making one’s choices known and
providing information about how one wants his/her
life to end, including the process of separating from
family and friends
[8] THE HOSPICE OPTION
20
Hospice: assisting dying people with pain
management and a dignified death (as opposed
to hospitals or nursing homes)
Provide palliative care: focused on relief from pain
or other disease symptoms
Emphasize quality of life
Goal is to make the person comfortable and
peaceful, but not to delay an inevitable death
Making End-of-Life Intentions Known
21
Living will: stating one’s wishes about life
support and other treatments
Durable power of attorney for healthcare: person
appoints someone to act as an agent for his/her
healthcare decisions
Life-support interventions when the person is
unconscious or otherwise incapable of expressing
wishes
Organ donation and other healthcare options
Making End-of-Life Intentions Known: The DNR
22
Do not resuscitate (DNR): should the heart or
breathing stop, there is to be no cardio or
pulmonary resuscitation
Inform medical personnel that you have a DNR
Let your relatives know what your wishes are and
where you keep all relevant documents
[9] THE GRIEVING PROCESS
23
Bereavement: the state or condition caused by loss
through death
Grief: the sorrow, hurt, anger, guilt, confusion, and
other feelings that arise after suffering a loss (varies
greatly)
Mourning: culturally approved ways in which grief
is expressed (fairly standard within a culture)
The Grieving Process
24
Grief involves choices in how we cope and actively
involves:
Acknowledging the loss’s realty
Working through the emotional turmoil
Adjusting to an environment where the deceased is
absent
Loosening ties to the deceased
The Grieving Process (cont’d.)
25
Grief is a process
No two people grieve alike
We must not underestimate how long people need to
deal with various issues (at least 1 year is needed
and 2 years are not uncommon)
We learn to live with the loss and move on, rather
than “recovering” from it
Risk Factors in Grief
26
Purported risk factors are kinship relationship,
social support, mode of death, age, personality,
religiosity, and gender
Older people suffer fewer health problems, but
social support reduces this age effect
Anticipatory grief: going through a period of
anticipating a loved one’s death, which supposedly
buffers its impact
[10] NORMAL GRIEF
27
REACTIONS
Grief reactions vary in intensity, such as sadness-
anger-hatred, confusion-helplessness-emptiness,
loneliness-acceptance-relief
Most common are sadness, denial, anger, loneliness,
and guilt
Grief work: psychological facets of coming to
terms with bereavement
People need space and time, and others should give
them these
Normal Grief Reactions: Five Themes of Grief and
the Anniversary Reaction
28
Five themes of grief
Coping: what people do to deal with grief
Affect: emotional reactions and triggers
Change: how life changes, including growth
Narrative: survivors’ stories about deceased
Relationship: kind of person the deceased was and
survivor’s ties with him/her
Normal Grief Reactions:
Physiological Reactions
29
Physiological reactions to grief?
Widows: sleep, neurological, and circulatory problems
Illness, declining physical health and use of services
Severe depression in some cases, which SSRIs can
help
Normal Grief Reactions: Expressions of Grief
30
Expressions of grief differ with ethnicity and
culture
Ex.: Latino – more than European-American men –
express grief behaviorally
Some cultures construct a “relationship” with the
deceased (e.g., “ghosts,” appearances in dreams)
Grief normally peaks 6 months after death, but
can continue 5 and even 50 years later
[11] COPING WITH GRIEF
31
Four-component model
The context of the loss
The continuation of subjective meaning associated
with loss
The changing representations of the lost relationship
over time
The role of coping and emotion-regulation
processes
Coping with Grief
32
Dual-process model (DPM)
Loss-oriented stressors: stressors related to the loss
itself (e.g., grief work)
Restoration-oriented stressors: stressors present when
adapting to the survivor’s new life situation (e.g.,
finding new relationships and activities)
Dynamic process in which bereaved cycle back and
forth between the two processes, ultimately balancing
the two
More on the Four-Component Model
33
Two implications of four-component model
A need to make meaning from the loss
Extensive grieving is helpful, whereas avoiding
grieving is harmful
Grief work as rumination hypothesis: extensive
rumination may actually increase distress
Resilient people use effective coping methods, such
as automated processes (distraction, attending to
positive emotions)
[12] COMPLICATED OR PROLONGED GRIEF
DISORDER
34
Two types of distress distinguish this disorder
from normal grief and depression
Separation distress: isolation; preoccupation with,
upsetting memories of, longing for the deceased to
the point of interfering with everyday functioning
Traumatic distress: disbelief and shock about the
death, experiencing the deceased’s presence;
mistrust, anger, and detachment from others
[13] DYING AND BEREAVEMENT
EXPERIENCES ACROSS THE LIFESPAN
35
Childhood
36
Preschoolers: death is temporary and magical
5-7 years: death is permanent, eventually
happens to everyone; reflects the shift to
concrete-operational thought
Older children: problem-focused coping and a
better sense of personal control appears
Children flip back and forth between grief and
normal activity
Adolescence
37
40-70% experience the loss of a family member or
friend during the college years
Their first experience of death is particularly
difficult and its effects severe, especially if
unexpected
Chronic illness, lingering guilt, low self-esteem, poorer
school & job performance, substance abuse,
relationship problems, and suicidal thinking
Adulthood
38
Young adults may feel that those who die at this
point are cheated out of their future
Loss of a partner in young adulthood is very
difficult because the loss is so unexpected; grief
can last for 5-10 years
Losing a spouse in middle adulthood results in
challenging basic assumptions about self,
relationships, and life options
Death of One’s Child in Young Adulthood
39
Mourning is intense; some never reconcile the
loss, and parents may divorce
Young parents who lose a child to SIDS report
high anxiety, more negative view of the world,
and guilt
Loss of a child during childbirth is traumatic due
to strong attachment, even though society expects
a quick recovery
Death of One’s Child in Middle Adulthood
40
Middle-aged parents’ loss of a young adult child is
equally devastating, causing anxiety, problems
functioning, and difficulties in relationships with
surviving siblings
Death of One’s Parent
41
When a parent dies, the loss hurts but also causes
the loss of a buffer between ourselves and death
Death of a parent may result in a loss of a source
of guidance, support, and advice
The loss of a parent may result in complex
emotions including relief, guilt, and a feeling of
freedom
Losing a parent due to Alzheimer’s disease may
feel like a second death
Late Adulthood
42
Older adults are often less anxious about death and
more accepting of it
Elders may feel that their most important life tasks
have been completed
Older adults are more likely to have experienced
loss before
Death of One’s Child or Grandchild in Late Life
43
Older bereaved parents may feel guilty about how
their pain about losing one child affected
relationships with surviving children
Many grieving parents report that the relationship
with the deceased child was the closest they ever
had
Bereaved grandparents tend to hide their grief
behavior in an attempt to shield the grieving
parents from more pain
Death of One’s Partner
44
U.S. society expects the surviving spouse to mourn
briefly, but older bereaved spouses may grieve for
30+ months
Depressed survivors’ memories of the relationship
are positively biased, whereas those of the non-
depressed are more negative (may reflect pre-death
quality of the relationship)