Scribd
Upload
350 views3 pages

LTE Strategic: MCS - Over RB - KarangAsem

This document discusses strategies for downlink consistency in resource block allocation and modulation and coding scheme selection. It proposes prioritizing allocating users running small packet services with a higher MCS to increase spectral efficiency, rather than allocating more resource blocks. However, this could increase delay and error rates for those users. The document recommends a less aggressive approach that allows the base station to allocate a higher MCS when possible instead of always using a lower MCS across more resource blocks. A field trial is proposed on sites with downlink PRB utilization under 40% to test this strategy.

Uploaded by

bagoes sidharta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
350 views3 pages

LTE Strategic: MCS - Over RB - KarangAsem

This document discusses strategies for downlink consistency in resource block allocation and modulation and coding scheme selection. It proposes prioritizing allocating users running small packet services with a higher MCS to increase spectral efficiency, rather than allocating more resource blocks. However, this could increase delay and error rates for those users. The document recommends a less aggressive approach that allows the base station to allocate a higher MCS when possible instead of always using a lower MCS across more resource blocks. A field trial is proposed on sites with downlink PRB utilization under 40% to test this strategy.

Uploaded by

bagoes sidharta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Tutela Improvement – Downlink Consistency

STRATEGIC

Aggressive MCS Over RB Allocation Strategy


MCS selection with prioritized RBs function of lowering the modulation and coding scheme (MCS) index to increase the number of resource blocks (RBs) with priority for UEs
running small-packet services. If the threshold of TTIs within which downlink scheduling is performed and RBs are surplus is less than this parameter value, the function is
enabled. It leads to spectral efficiency decrement as more RB are used to deliver the same TBS size and also increase the interference level to the neighbor as more RB is used.
Less aggressive RB prioritization over MCS is advised to allow eNodeB to allocates higher MCS instead of using low MCS with more RB.

THE THE THE THE


PRO’S CON’S PARAMETERS SITES

more efficient resource allocation as increases the small-packet service CellDlSchAlgo.RbPriMcsSelectRatioThd The Trials will be on the sites in
the eNodeB allocates the small- delay and the IBLER increases for UEs DL PRB Util <40%
packet services with higher MCS running services of small traffic from 10, 40 and 100 to 0
instead of allocating more RB volumes Trial in : KARANG ASEM

Increased DL Spectral Efficiency May affect BLER

NPI Supreme 4.0 1


MCS over RB Allocation Strategy
CQI vs User DL Thp (Mbps)
Payload vs SE 12 40000
400000 1.8
11.5 35000
1.7
350000 11 30000
1.6
10.5 25000
300000
ALL MAINTAINED
1.5
10 20000
250000
Payload_GB

1.4
9.5 15000

SE
200000 1.3
9 10000
1.2 Average CQI User_DL_Avg_Throughput (Mbps)
150000
1.1
100000 Modulation vs DL BLER (%)
1
100% 17
50000
0.9 90%
80% 15
0 0.8
70%
13
Payload_GB SE 60%
50% 11
40%
9
30%
20%
PAYLOAD SE 7

+4.39% +1.99 % 136 Cells Executed


10%
0% 5
SUMMARY

QPSK 16QAM 64QAM 256QAM DL_BLER (%)

TRIAL IN
KARANG ASEM • SE improved 1.99% from 1.93 to 1.97
USER DL THP 64 QAM • Modulation 64 QAM improved 5.89% & Payload also improved 4.39%
+0.48% +5.89% •
•
DL BLER degraded 6.78% from 13.48 to 14.4%
Overall others KPI are maintain

NPI Supreme 4.0 2


MCS over RB Allocation Strategy
Most Impacted Cell : E_APR024_Karangasem_21

SE
Payload vs SE 3.20

2.44
3000 5

4.5 + 31.1%
2500
4

3.5 Before After


2000
3

1500 2.5

2 Payload_MB
8504.24
1000
1.5
6730.77

+ 26.3%
500
0.5

0 0

Payload_GB SE Before After

NPI Supreme 4.0 3

You might also like