This document discusses project evaluation and auditing. It covers the purposes of evaluation, which include appraising progress against plans and goals. Evaluation criteria can measure budget, schedule, performance, customer satisfaction, business success, and future potential. The purposes of auditing a project include identifying problems, clarifying relationships, improving performance, and reducing costs. An audit examines project management, methodology, records, budgets, and degree of completion. Key aspects of conducting effective evaluations and audits are also outlined.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views54 pages
Chapter Eight
This document discusses project evaluation and auditing. It covers the purposes of evaluation, which include appraising progress against plans and goals. Evaluation criteria can measure budget, schedule, performance, customer satisfaction, business success, and future potential. The purposes of auditing a project include identifying problems, clarifying relationships, improving performance, and reducing costs. An audit examines project management, methodology, records, budgets, and degree of completion. Key aspects of conducting effective evaluations and audits are also outlined.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 54
CHAPTER EIGHT
EVALUATING AND PROJECT
CLOSURE Cont’d... The term “ evaluate ” means to set the value of or appraise. A project evaluation appraises the progress and performance relative to the project ’ s initial or revised plan. The evaluation also appraises the project against the goals and objectives set for it during the selection process amended, of course, by any changes in the goals and objectives made during the project ’ s life. Evaluation criteria
There are many different measures that
may be applied in a project evaluation. As indicated, senior management may have particular areas they want evaluated for future planning and decisions, and these should be indicated in the charge to the evaluation committee. Cont’d... A project evaluation is an appraisal for use by top management. Its criteria should include the needs of management; the organization ’ s stated and unstated goals; the original selection basis for the project; and its success to date in terms of its efficiency, customer impact/satisfaction, business success, and future potential. Cont’d…
Measuring the project ’ s success on
budget, schedule, and performance is easier than measuring revenues or qualitative, subjective factors. Establishing the measures at project formation is helpful, as well as using carefully standardized measurement techniques for the subjective factors. Purposes of Evaluation - Goals of the System
Four independent dimensions of success:
The most straightforward dimension is the project’s efficiency in meeting both the budget and schedule Another dimension, and the most complex, is that of customer impact/satisfaction A third dimension, again somewhat straightforward and expected, is business/direct success The last dimension, somewhat more difficult and nebulous to ascertain, is future potential Cont’d… Another primary purpose of evaluation is to help translate the achievement of the project’s goals into a contribution to the parent organization’s goals To do this, all facets of the project are studied in order to identify and understand the project’s strengths and weaknesses The result is a set of recommendations that can help both ongoing and future projects Cont’d… A successful project evaluation can help an organization: Identify problems earlier Clarify performance, cost, and time relationships Improve project performance Locate opportunities for future technological advances Evaluate the quality of project management Reduce costs Cont’d… Speed the achievement of results Identify mistakes, remedy them, and avoid them in the future Provide information to the client Reconfirm the organization’s interest in, and commitment to, the project The Project Audit
The project audit is a thorough examination of
the management of a project, its methodology and procedures, its records, its properties, its budgets and expenditures and its degree of completion The formal report may be presented in various formats, but should, at a minimum contain comments on some specific points. Cont’d… Six parts of a project audit: 1. Current status of the project 2. Future status 3. Status of crucial tasks 4. Risk assessment 5. Information pertinent to other projects 6. Limitations of the audit It is far broader in scope than a financial audit and may deal with the project as a whole or any component or set of components of the project Depth of the Audit Time and money are two of the most common limits on depth of investigation and level of detail presented in the audit report Accumulation, storage, and maintenance of auditable data are important cost elements Two often overlooked costs are the self protective activity of team members during an audit, and the potential for project morale to suffer as a result of a negative audit. Cont’d… There are three distinct and easily recognized levels of project auditing: General audit - normally most constrained by time and resources and is usually a brief review of the project touching lightly on the six parts of an audit Detailed audit - usually conducted when a follow- up to the general audit is required Technical audit - generally carried out by a qualified technician under the direct guidance of the project auditor Timing of the Audit The first audits are usually done early in the project’s life Early audits are often focused on the technical issues in order to make sure that key technical problems have been solved Audits done later in the life cycle of a project are of less immediate value to the project, but are more valuable to the parent organization. Cont’d… As the project develops, technical issues are less likely to be matters of concern Conformity to the schedule and budget become the primary interests Management issues are major matters of interest for audits made late in the project’s life Post-project audits are often a legal necessity because the client specified such an audit in the contract. Construction and Use of the Audit Report
The information should be arranged so as to
facilitate the comparison of predicted versus actual results Significant deviations of actual from predicted results should be highlighted and explained in a set of footnotes or comments Negative comments about individuals or groups associated with the project should be avoided Cont’d… Information that should be contained in the audit report: 1. Introduction 2. Current status 3. Future project status 4. Critical Management issues 5. Risk Analysis 6. Caveats, Limitations, and Assumptions Responsibilities of the Project Auditor/Evaluator
First and foremost, the auditor should “tell the
truth” The auditor must approach the audit in an objective and ethical manner Must assume responsibility for what is included and excluded from consideration in the report The auditor/evaluator must maintain political and technical independence during the audit and treat all materials as confidential Cont’d…. Steps to carry out an audit: Assemble a small team of experienced experts Familiarize the team with the requirements of the project Audit the project on site After the completion, debrief the project’s management Cont’d…
Produce a written report according to a pre-
specified format Distribute the report to the project manager and project team for their response Follow up to see if the recommendations have been implemented The Project Audit Life Cycle
Like the project itself, the audit has a life cycle
composed of an orderly progression of well- defined events: Project audit initiation Project baseline definition Establishing an audit database Preliminary analysis of the project Audit report preparation Project audit termination Essentials of an Audit/ Evaluation
For an audit/evaluation to be conducted with
skill and precision, and to be generally accepted by senior management, the client and the project team, several conditions must be met: The audit team must be properly selected All records and files must be accessible Free contact with project members must be preserved The Audit/Evaluation Team
The choice of the audit/evaluation team is
critical to the success of the entire process The size of the team will generally be a function of the size and complexity of the project For a small project, one person can often handle all the tasks of an audit, but for a large project, the team may require representatives from several areas Cont’d… Typical areas that may furnish audit team members are: The project itself The accounting/controlling department Technical specialty areas The customer The marketing department Purchasing/asset management Human resources Legal/contract administration department Cont’d… The main role of the audit/evaluation team is to conduct a thorough and complete examination of the project or some pre-specified aspect of the project The team must determine which items should be brought to management’s attention The team is responsible for constructive observations and advice based on the training and experience of its members. Access to Records In order for the audit/evaluation team to be effective, it must have free access to all information relevant to the project Most of the information needed will come from the project team’s records or from various departments such as accounting, personnel, and purchasing Some of the most valuable information comes from documents that predate the project Cont’d… Examples of documents that predate the project: Correspondence with the customer that led to RFP Minutes of the project selection committee Minutes of senior management committees that decided to pursue a specific area of technical interest Priorities must be set to ensure that important analyses are undertaken before those of lesser importance Access to Project Personnel and Others
There are several rules that should be followed
when contacting project personnel Care must be taken to avoid misunderstandings between the audit/evaluation team and project team members Project personnel should always be made aware of an in- progress audit Critical comments should be avoided Cont’d… At times, information may be given to audit evaluation team members in confidence Discreet attempts should be made to confirm such information through non-confidential sources If it cannot be confirmed, it should not be used The auditor/evaluator must protect the sources of confidential information Measurement Measurement is an integral part of the audit/evaluation process Performance against planned budget and schedule usually poses no major measurement problems Measuring the actual expenditure against the planned budget is harder and depends on an in-depth understanding of the procedures used by the accounting department Cont’d… It is a very difficult task to determine what revenues should be assigned to a project All cost/revenue allocation decisions must be made when the various projects are initiated The battles are fought “up front” and the equity of cost/revenue allocations ceases to be so serious an issue As long as allocations are made by a formula, major conflict is avoided-or at least, mitigated The Auditor/Evaluator
Above all else, the auditor/evaluator needs
“permission to enter the system” If the auditor maintains a calm, relaxed attitude, the project team generally begins to extend limited trust The first step is to allow the auditor qualified access to information about the project Cont’d… The auditor/evaluator should deal gently with information gathered, neither ignoring nor stressing the project’s shortcomings Recognition and appreciation should be given to the project’s strengths If this is done, trust will be extended and permission to enter the system will be granted Trust-building is a slow and delicate process that is easily thwarted Project Closure The Varieties of Project Termination
A project can be said to be terminated when
work on the substance of the project has ceased or slowed to the point that further progress is no longer possible There are four fundamentally different ways to close out a project: extinction, addition, integration, and starvation Termination by Extinction
The project may end because it has been successful
and achieved its goals The project may also be stopped because it is unsuccessful or has been superseded A special case of termination by extinction is “termination by murder” which can range from political assassination to accidental projecticide Cont’d…
Two important characteristics of termination
by murder are the suddenness of project demise and the lack of obvious signals that death is imminent When a decision is made to terminate a project by extinction, the most noticeable event is that all activity on the substance of the project ceases Termination by Addition If a project is a major success, it may be terminated by institutionalizing it as a formal part of the parent organization Project personnel, property, and equipment are often simply transferred from the dying project to the newly born division The transition from project to division demands a superior level of political sensitivity for successful accomplishment Termination by Integration This method of terminating projects is the most common way of dealing with successful projects, and the most complex The property, equipment, material, personnel, and functions of the project are distributed among the existing elements of the parent organization Cont’d… In general, the problems of integration are inversely related to the level of experience that the parent or client has had with: the technology being integrated the successful integration of other projects, regardless of technology Cont’d… A few of the more important aspects of the transition from project to integrated operation that must be considered: Personnel - where will the team go? Manufacturing - is the training complete? Accounting/Finance - have the project’s account been closed and audited? Engineering - are all drawings complete and on file? Information Systems/Software - has the new system been thoroughly tested? Marketing - is the sales department aware of the change? Termination by Starvation This type of project termination is a “slow starvation by budget decrement” There are many reasons why senior management does not wish to terminate an unsuccessful or obsolete project: Politically dangerous to admit that one has championed a failure Terminating a project that has not accomplished its goals is an admission of failure When to Terminate a Project Some questions to ask when considering termination: Has the project been obviated by technical advances? Is the output of the project still cost-effective? Is it time to integrate or add the project as a part of regular operations? Are there better alternative uses for the funds, time and personnel devoted to the project? Has a change in the environment altered the need for the project’s output? Cont’d… Fundamental reasons why some projects fail to produce satisfactory answers to termination questions: A project organization is not required Insufficient support from senior management Naming the wrong person as project manager Poor planning These and a few other reasons, are the base cause of most project failures The specific causes derive from these fundamental issues The Termination Process The termination process has two distinct parts First is the decision whether or not to terminate Second, if the decision is to terminate the project, the decision must be carried out The Decision Process Decision-aiding models for the termination decision fall into two generic categories: 1. Models that base the decision on the degree to which the project qualifies against a set of factors generally held to be associated with successful projects 2. Models that base the decision on the degree to which the project meets the goals and objectives set for it Just as the decision criteria, constraints, weights, and environmental data are unique to each organization, so are the specifics of using any decision model The Implementation Process The actual termination can be planned and orderly, or a simple hatchet job Special termination managers are sometimes useful in completing the long and involved process of shutting down a project The primary duties of the manager in charge of termination can be encompassed in nine general tasks Cont’d… Duties of the termination manager: Ensure completion of the work, including tasks performed by subcontractors Notify the client of project completion and ensure that delivery is accomplished Ensure that documentation is complete including a terminal evaluation of the project deliverables and preparation of the project’s Final Report Clear for final billings and oversee preparation of the final invoices sent to the client Cont’d… Redistribute personnel, materials equipment, and any other resources to the appropriate places Clear project with legal counsel or consultant Determine what records to keep Ascertain any product support requirements, decide how each support will be delivered, and assign responsibility Oversee the closing of the project’s books Cont’d… Most project managers delay the personnel reassignment/release issue as long as possible for three main reasons: 1. A strong reluctance to face the interpersonal conflicts that might arise when new assignments and layoffs are announced 2. Worry that people will lose interest and stop work on the project as soon as it becomes known that termination is being considered 3. Concern that team members will try to avoid death by stretching out the work as far as possible The Final Report - A Project History
The final report is the history of the project
It is a chronicle of the life and times of the project, a compendium of what went right and what went wrong The required information is contained in the master plan, all project audits, and evaluations The precise organization of the report is not of great concern; the content is The Final Report Several Subjects should be addressed in the final report: Project performance Administrative performance Organizational structure Project and administrative teams Techniques of project management Cont’d.. For each element covered in the final report, recommendations for changing current practice should be made and defended Equally important are comments and recommendations about those aspects of the project that worked unusually well The fundamental purpose of the final report is to improve future projects END of THE COURSE