0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views19 pages

Revision of The South African Pavement Design Method Louw Kannemeyer

The document discusses proposed revisions to the South African Pavement Design Method (SAMDM). It provides a historical overview of SAMDM's development and identifies weaknesses in the current method. The proposed revisions include developing models that more accurately predict reality, creating a more impartial design that is not biased toward any pavement type, and developing a single "tool" approach for different user and risk levels. A research and development framework is outlined with immediate, short, medium, and long-term objectives to update distressed damage models and resilient response models.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views19 pages

Revision of The South African Pavement Design Method Louw Kannemeyer

The document discusses proposed revisions to the South African Pavement Design Method (SAMDM). It provides a historical overview of SAMDM's development and identifies weaknesses in the current method. The proposed revisions include developing models that more accurately predict reality, creating a more impartial design that is not biased toward any pavement type, and developing a single "tool" approach for different user and risk levels. A research and development framework is outlined with immediate, short, medium, and long-term objectives to update distressed damage models and resilient response models.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Revision of the South African Pavement

Design Method

Louw Kannemeyer
Aka GODZILLA

Slide 2
Historical overview – SAMDM development

• Origin of Current SAMDM – Damage Models


• Fatigue of asphalt concrete wearing courses
• Freeme – 1970s
• Fatigue of asphalt concrete base layers including temperature
• Published data – 1970s to 1980s
• FoS permanent deformation for unbound material
• Maree – 1970s to 1980s
• Effective fatigue and crushing failure for cement stabilized layers
• de Beer – 1980s
• Vertical strain criteria for subgrade
• Dorman and Metcalf – 1965

New Tire Technology

Increased Tire Pressure

Slide 3
SAMDM - Current status

• Past implementation exposed all the weaknesses of the


method
• Users became disillusioned with the method
• Counter-intuitive and inadmissible results
• Extreme sensitivity of the method to input
• Inconsistent input
• Resilient response (FWD, MDD, Laboratory)
• Strength parameters
• Statements made that ME-design is not possible
• Too many unexplained effects (chaos)
• Design can only be based on past performance (LTPP, rehabilitation
investigation, etc.)

Slide 4
R&D Dream #1: Close Gap Between Reality and Theory

Reality Theory

Rut

Terminal rut

Roughness

Terminal IRI

Extent of fatigue

Time

Slide 5
Adjust the Theory to Predict Reality
R&D Dream #2: Levelling the Playing Field

10

7
Level of Development

0
Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Area 5 Area 6 Area 7 Area 8 Area 9 Area 10

Slide 6
Overall system just as good as Weakest Link
R&D Dream #3: Single “Tool” – Different User/Risk Levels

User Design application

Young Design scenario:


• Routine and preliminary design
professional • Low risk
• Low design experience
• Known materials – default input
• Conventional material classification

Design scenario:
• Important design
Seasoned • Medium risk
professional • Seasoned professional designer
• Project specific input

Design scenario:
Design • Very important design, high risk
Specialist • Special investigations
• Specialist designer
• Unusual materials
• Project specific input

Slide 7
Research and Development (R&D) Framework

• Pavement Design Task Group


• Established May 2005
• Series of meetings during July and August 2005
• R&D framework submitted in November 2005
• Characteristics of new pavement design method
• R&D topics
• Demand analysis (Traffic and environment)
• Material resilient response models
• Pavement resilient response models
• Damage models
• Probabilistic and recursive schemes
• Each R&D topic have a number of identified R&D needs
• Each R&D need translated into one or more project briefs to address the need
– November 2006

Slide 8
Project Objectives

• Overall objective
• To develop a design method that is
• Accurate (agree with reality)
• Impartial in terms of pavement type selection
• Unbound (Crushed stone, natural gravel)
• Stabilised (Cement, Foamed-bitumen, Emulsified-bitumen)
• HMA
• Concrete (not included in flexible pavement design R&D process)

• Project structured according to immediate, short, medium


and long-term objectives and deliverables
• Achievement of immediate, short, medium and long-term objectives
subject to availability of resources

Slide 9
Time-frame for R&D process

Immediate 12 to 18 months

3 to 5 years
Short-term
(1.5 to 3 years)
5 to 8 years
Medium-term
(3 to 5 years)
8 to 12 years
Long-term
>5 Years

Slide 10
R&D Process

• Project funding and contracts


• Funding organisations will sponsor projects of interest to them
• Contract between service provider and project client
• Project management
• Phase 1 – Develop Detailed Project Briefs - Done
• Phase 2 - Inception Phase (In Progress – 27th June 2007)
• Investigate available solutions
• Finalize project methodology
• Finalize cost and resource allocation
• Phase 3 – Delivery of immediate, short, medium deliverables
(Anticipated Start Date – November 2007)

Slide 11
R&D Process (continued)

• Overarching integration level project


• Integration of output from various ME-design related projects
• Integration of performance based information system with ME-
design components in a single design method
• Delivery mechanisms
• Website for tracking progress on R&D process and sharing general
information
• Any content (documents and software) developed as part of the
project available for use on the project website
• Immediate, short, medium and long-term output
• User-manual with an overview of the method
• Detail technical documents on individual components
• Technical guidelines, test protocols and method specifications

Slide 12
Input layers

Geometry

Axle load Fixed

Computer
solution
Traffic histogram load
Damage models
data Contact stress Fixed
histogram contact stress
Thermal cracking
Resilient
response models Fatigue

HMA
Grading Plastic strain/
Mr = Constant permanent deformation
Binder
content Top-down cracking
Binder
HMA

properties Plastic strain/

Unbound
Mr = f (Temp) permanent deformation
Temperature
Other
Resilient
Structural
Other response
Crushing capacity
Mr = f (Dens, analysis
estimate
saturation)
Grading

Stabilized
Stiffness reduction
Material data

Atterberg Plastic strain/


Mr = f (Bulk
limits permanent deformation
and shear
Unbound

Moisture stress)
Other
content
Plastic strain/

Subgrade
Density
permanent deformation
Mr = f (Strain)
Other Other

UCS Linear
visco-elastic
Stress and
Stabilized

strain at break
Time/previous
loading Other?

Other
PB/2006/E-1 and PB/2006/E-2

Geometry

PB/2006/A-2

Computer
solution
PB/2006/A-3 Damage models
PB/2006/A-4
PB/2006/A-1

Resilient PB/2006/C-1
response models

HMA
PB/2006/D-1
Grading

Binder
content PB/2006/B-1b
Binder
HMA

properties

Unbound
PB/2006/C-3
PB/2006/D-2

PB/2006/B-4
Temperature PB/2006/B-2 and PB/2006/B-3

Other? PB/2006/E-3

Stabilized
Grading
PB/2006/C-4
PB/2006/B-4

PB/2006/D-3
Atterberg
PB/2006/B-1a

limits
Unbound

Moisture
content

Subgrade
Density

PB/2006/C-5 PB/2006/D-2
Other?

UCS
PB/2006/B-1c

Stress and
Stabilized

strain at break
Time/previous PB/2006/C-2
loading

Other?
Immediate Short-term Medium-term

PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

PB/2006/A-1 Tyre loading and contact stress information system

Information system shell Ongoing population of


with available data information system

PB/2006/A-2 Traffic volume and axle load information system

Information system shell with available data: Ongoing population of Dynamic error adjustment
•Data filters information system
•Bias adjustment
•Random (dynamic effect) error adjustment

PB/2006/A-3 Traffic survey and design traffic calculation guidelines

A contact stress and traffic Guidelines and method specs for Revision of guidelines and
survey strategy for southern Africa contact stress and traffic surveys method specifications`
TMH 8 & TRH 16
Training material

PB/2006/A-4 Effects of vehicle dynamics on traffic input for pavement design

Forward modelling of dynamic Backward modelling of static


axle load spectra axle load spectra

PB/2006/C-1

Slide 15
Immediate Short-term Medium-term

PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

PB/2006/B-1a Resilient response models for unbound material


Static model = f (D, MC, σ) Ongoing model calibration
Dynamic model = f (D, MC, σ) Link to engineering parameters
Test protocols and model calibration Long-term changes
procedures

PB/2006/B-1b Resilient response models for HMA material


Static model = f (T, mix) Ongoing model calibration
Dynamic model = f (T, mix) Long-term changes
Test protocols and model calibration Link to engineering parameters
procedures Resilient response master curves

PB/2006/B-1c Resilient response models for stabilised material


Tri-axial or flexural testing? Ongoing model calibration
Static model = f (mix) Long-term changes
Dynamic model = f (mix) Link to engineering parameters
Test protocols and model calibration
procedures

PB/2006/B-2 Agreement between resilient modulus results from different tests

Guidelines for deflection bowl utilisation Static and dynamic back-calculation


Fundamental principles of different tests Agreement between test methods

PB/2006/B-3 Material testing, interpretation of results and deriving design input

Guidelines

PB/2006/B-4 A design input information system for road-building materials

Updated refusal density models Calibrated models for an


Calibrated resilient response models extended range of materials

Slide 16 PB/2006/C-3
Immediate Short-term Medium-term

PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

PB/2006/C-1 Improved modelling of non-uniform contact stress distribution


Closed form solution for circular, Finite element (FE) solution for
non-uniform 3D contact stress irregular shape, non-uniform 3D
contact stress

PB/2006/C-2 A benchmark of stress and strain in a variety of pavements

1st order system for measuring T, σ, Wireless intelligent aggregate


, , psuc Additional T, σ, , , psuc
Benchmark set of T,σ, , , psuc

PB/2006/C-3 Modelling vertical and horizontal variation in pavement response related to the temperature and stress dependency of materials
Closed form solution FE solution
•Temp. gradient in AC •3D variation in temp. dens. MC
•Dens. and MC gradient in unbound and stress condition
•Effective stress in unbound •Thermally coupled analysis
•Stress dependency in unbound •Effective stress in unbound

PB/2006/C-4 Improved modelling of geometric non-linearity

Closed form solution with layer slip FE solution with cracks

PB/2006/C-5 Improved modelling of material non-linearity and dynamic pavement response

Closed form visco-elastic solution FE solution FE solution


•Perfect plasticity •Visco-elasto-plastic
•Dynamic response analysis

Slide 17
Immediate Short-term Medium-term

PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

PB/2006/D-1 Improved damage models for bituminous materials


Fatigue damage models based on PMS based damage distributions SA based fatigue and plastic strain
overseas research and expected life for surface seals damage models for HMA surfacing and
Plastic strain predictive models and non-structural thin layer base courses
Test protocols and damage model bituminous surfacings Mechanistic damage models for seals
calibration procedures for bituminous and non-structural thin layer
material bituminous surfacings

PB/2006/D-2 Improved plastic strain and shear damage models for unbound material

A subgrade permanent deformation Ongoing calibration of yield


damage model strength and plastic strain damage
Calibrated yield strength and plastic models
strain damage models for unbound Continuous damage models for
structural layers non-linear recursive analysis
Test protocols and model calibration Yield strength and damage models
procedures for unbound material related to engineering parameters

PB/2006/D-3 Improved damage models for stabilized material


Final recommendation on appropriate Yield strength, plastic strain and
damage models; flexibility models calibrated for a
Accelerated curing procedures for comprehensive range of stabilized
simulating short and long-term aging; materials at different stabilizer
Test protocols for yield strength, contents and different stages of
plastic strain and flexibility testing; curing
The effect of long-term changes on
the yield strength, flexibility and plastic
deformation resistance;
Recalibration of the effective fatigue
damage model for cement-treated
material.

Slide 18 PB/2006/B-3 PB/2006/B-4


Immediate Short-term Medium-term

PB/2006/ILP Integration level project

PB/2006/E-1 Actual spatial and time variation of field variables, engineering parameters and the environment
Information system shell for Ongoing population of information
•Spatial and time variation of field systems
variables and engineering parameters Models relating pavement conditions
•Spatial and time variation of to environmental variables
environmental variables

PB/2006/E-2 Guidelines on the collection and interpretation of statistical data

Guidelines for collecting sufficiently


large data samples and method
specifications for statistical analysis and
interpretation of the input data for new
and rehabilitation design;
Training material on the content of
the above documents.

PB/2006/E-3 Design risk analysis and pavement performance simulation


Probabilistic simulation on design Linear recursive simulation for Non-linear recursive simulation
traffic and bearing capacity estimation time-based modeling of pavement for time-based modeling of
to calculate design risk. performance pavement performance

Slide 19

You might also like