100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views10 pages

Different Techniques of Interrogation

This document discusses different techniques for interrogating suspects. It describes the interrogator's attitude and presence, the purpose of interrogation, requirements for the interrogation room, and legal requirements. It then outlines several interrogation techniques including emotional appeal, kindness, shifting blame, pretending evidence was found, and jolting the suspect. The document stresses using the right officer, questions, manner, time, place to get the right answers.

Uploaded by

Garcia Rowell S.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views10 pages

Different Techniques of Interrogation

This document discusses different techniques for interrogating suspects. It describes the interrogator's attitude and presence, the purpose of interrogation, requirements for the interrogation room, and legal requirements. It then outlines several interrogation techniques including emotional appeal, kindness, shifting blame, pretending evidence was found, and jolting the suspect. The document stresses using the right officer, questions, manner, time, place to get the right answers.

Uploaded by

Garcia Rowell S.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF

INTERROGATION
 It is process of obtaining information from person.
 Is a questioning of a person suspected if having commited an offense or a person
who is reluctant to make full disclosure of information in his possession which is
pertinent to the investigation.
What should be the attitude of the interrogator ?

 Dominate the interview


 Avoid distracting mannerism
 Language
 Dress
 Preliminary conduct
 Presence of other person
 Place
Purpose of Interrogation

 TO OBTAIN CONFESSION TO THE CRIME


 TO INDUCE THE SUSPECT TO MAKE ADMISSION
 TO LEARN THE FACTS OF THE CRIME
 TO LEARN THE IDENTITY OF THE ACCOMPLICE
 TO DEVELOP INFORMATION WHICH WILL LEAD TO THE RECOVERY OF THE
FRUITS OF THE CRIME
 TO DISCOVER THE DETAILS OF OTHER CRIMES PARTICIPATED BY THE SUSPECT.
Description of the interrogation room

 Privacy can having can having one door, absence of windos, sound proof wall,
and telephone without ringing bell
 Simplicity-medium size room bare walls, no glaring lights, minimum furniture
 Seating arrangement- straight back chair for the suspect table with flat surface, the
back of the suspect must be facing on door.
 Technical aid- installation of recording device and one way mirror.
Legal requirements of interrogation

 The statement of the subject must be obtained voluntary and trustworthy and not by means or use
of threat, fear, coertion,duress or any improper tactics which will vitiate the free will of the
subject. Remember RA 7438.
INTERROGATTION TECHNIQUES

 Emotional Appeal - place the subject in the proper frame of mind. Analyze the
subject’s personality and decide what motivation would prompt him to tell the
truth, then provide those motives through appropriate emotional appeals.
 Sympathetic appeal - the suspect may feel the need for symphaty or friendship.
He is apparently in trouble. Gesture of friendship may win his cooperation.
 Kindness - The simplest technique is to assume that the suspect will confess if he
treated in a kind and friendly manner.
 Extenuation- The investigator indicates he does not consider his subject’s indis
creation a grave offense.
 Shifting the blame- The interrogator makes clear his belief that the subject is
obviously not the sort of person who usually get mixed up in a crime like this.
Bluff on a split pair

 This is applicable when there are more than one suspect. The suspect are
separated and one is informed that other has talked.
Pretense of physical Evidence

 The investigator may pretend that certain physical evidence has found by
labarotory experts against him.
Jolting

 May be applied to calm and nervous subject. By constantly observing the suspect,
The investigator chooses a propitious moment to shout a pertinent question and
appear as thought he is beside himself with rage. The subject may be unnerved to
the extend of confessing.
A Philosophy of Interview and
Interrogation
 The RIGHT officer
 Asking the RIGHT questions
 In the RIGHT manner
 At the RIGHT time and in the RIGHT place
 Will get the RIGHT answers

You might also like