CBD Developed Plans and Protocols
CBD Developed Plans and Protocols
*Source: Convention on Biological Diversity, 413, Saint Jacques Street, suite 800 Montreal QC H2Y 1N9 Canada. 2009
I. Cartagena Protocol (2000)
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety is a legally
binding global protocol that seeks to contribute to
ensuring the safe transfer, handling and use of living
modified organisms (LMOs) created through modern
biotechnology.
Updated and revised in 2010, with targets set to be achieved by 2020. The
GSPC's targets are output oriented, specific, and measurable.
*Source: Access and Benefits sharing - About the Nagoya Protocol. June 9, 2015
IV. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020
The Strategic Plan is comprised of a shared vision, a
mission, strategic goals and 20 ambitious targets,
collectively known as the Aichi Targets.
*Source: Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets". Convention on Biological Diversity. October 11, 2022
V. Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
- Sets out an ambitious plan to implement broad-based action to bring
about a transformation in society’s relationship with biodiversity,
ensuring that by 2050 the shared vision of ‘living in harmony with
nature’ is fulfilled.
*Source: Article - A New Global Framework for Managing Nature Through 2030. June 7, 2021
VI. Marine and Coastal Biodiversity
The CBD has a significant focus on marine and coastal biodiversity. A
series of expert workshops have been held (2018-2022) to identify
options for modifying the description of Ecologically or Biologically
Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) and describing worldwide.
*Source: Convention on Biological Diversity, 413, Saint Jacques Street, suite 800 Montreal QC H2Y 1N9 Canada. 2009
II. Issues under the Philippines
1. Lack of awareness (example is the need for a consolidated inventory
of biodiversity resources)
2. Good governance issues due to lack of enforcement and political
will
3. Research and knowledge management gaps due to lack or expertise
in the field of biodiversity
4. Lack of effective policies
5. Financing requirements due to low budget allotment to biodiversity
programs
6. Lack of capacity
7. Socio-economic factors (e.g., the need for scaling up sustainable
livelihood programs, growing population increases utilization of
biodiversity resources leading to higher demand for livelihood)
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
I. Lack of awareness (example is the need for a consolidated
inventory of biodiversity resources)
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
II. Good governance issues due to lack of enforcement and political will
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
III. Research and knowledge management gaps due to lack or expertise
in the field of biodiversity
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
IV. Lack of effective policies
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
V. Financing requirements due to low budget allotment to
biodiversity programs
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
VI. Lack of capacity
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016
Proposed Philippine Plans and Supporting Actions
VII. Socio-economic factors (e.g., the need for scaling up
sustainable livelihood programs, growing population increases
utilization of biodiversity resources leading to higher demand for
livelihood)
*Source: Philippine Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2018. Copyright 2016