Scribd
Upload
58 views11 pages

PSP Analysis Steps

The PSP analysis of well J58-90B identified 7 producing intervals, calculated their individual flow rates, and found an overall production of 5,671 BFPD and 6% water cut. The analysis verified the well was producing as expected as a new well. No further actions were recommended at this time.

Uploaded by

Raed fouad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
58 views11 pages

PSP Analysis Steps

The PSP analysis of well J58-90B identified 7 producing intervals, calculated their individual flow rates, and found an overall production of 5,671 BFPD and 6% water cut. The analysis verified the well was producing as expected as a new well. No further actions were recommended at this time.

Uploaded by

Raed fouad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

PSP Analysis steps

March 2013
Introduction

Production logging:
Qualitative and quantitative contribution measurement of each producing
interval in a well
Objective:
• Zonal contribution
• Cross flow detection
• Cross flow behind the casing
• Rate measurement (Test)
• Determining water production through casing leak and channel leak
• Determining free gas production
• Evaluating completion efficiency
• Providing guidance for workovers and enhanced recovery methods
Tools

Single phase flow:

− Flowmeter (to calculate the flow rate)


− Thermometer (to calculate fluid entries)
− Pressure gauge (to evaluate well’s performance)

Multiphase flow:

− Fluid density
Analysis Step 1 (Example J58-90B)

• From the shut in pass, pick a point where the cable speed is stable and RPS is
stable with no noise.

Example at depth 111040


• Now, at this depth read from the LAS file the exact cable speeds and RPS and
record it in the following table
SHUT-IN PASSES

Down CAPLE SPEED, Ft/Min 30.56 60.54 89.75 120


RPS 1.43 3.2241 5 6.66
Analysis Step 2 (Example J58-90B)

• Draw the response line:

J58-90B PSP log analysis

40 Linear (Response line)

35

30

25
RPS

20

15

10

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400

FT / MIN
Analysis Step 3 (Example J58-90B)

Go to the flowing passes and start noting the correct cable speed, RPS and log density at each
station (also from LAS file):
Example : Station A @ 10920
FLOWING PASSES 385 370 360 357

A @ 10920 B @ 10970 C @ 10992 D @ 11020


CABLE SPEED, FT/MIN
F/M RPS F/M RPS F/M RPS F/M RPS
30 29.5 24.00 29.9 23.00 29.1 22.60 29.7 21.80
60 60.6 26.90 59.5 25.43 59.7 25.39 59.8 24.41
90 91.5 28.60 90.5 27.50 90.6 27.25 91.1 26.10
120 119.9 30.27 120.1 29.18 121.3 29.10 120.3 28.00
Stations 0.0 22.7 0.0 21.8 0.0 21.5 0.0 21.0
LOG DENSITY 0.706 0.720 0.723 0.721

E @ 11060 F @ 11095 G @11132


CABLE SPEED, FT/MIN
F/M RPS F/M RPS F/M RPS
30 29.4 14.60 29.5 12.16 29.3 7.13
60 60.0 17.07 60.2 14.12 61.0 9.18
90 90.8 18.80 90.7 16.00 91.4 11.11
120 119.8 20.60 121.0 17.64 121.0 13.00
Stations 0.0 13.2 0.0 10.5 0.0 5.3
LOG DENSITY 0.720 0.720 0.720
232 183 97
Analysis Step 4 (Example J58-90B)

• Draw the flowing lines parallel to the response line and record the y-
intercept:
• The y-intercept recorded is the v needed at each station
J58-90B PSP log analysis
Station A @ 10920 Station B Station C @ 10992
40 Station D Station E@ 11060 Station F@11095
Station g@11132 Linear (Response line)
35

30

25
RPS

20

15

10

0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400

FT / MIN
Analysis Step 5 (Example J58-90B)

• In the same table, record the velocities at 0 cable speed and RPS

FLOWING PASSES 385 370 360 357

A @ 10920 B @ 10970 C @ 10992 D @ 11020


CABLE SPEED, FT/MIN
F/M RPS F/M RPS F/M RPS F/M RPS
30 29.5 24.00 29.9 23.00 29.1 22.60 29.7 21.80
60 60.6 26.90 59.5 25.43 59.7 25.39 59.8 24.41
90 91.5 28.60 90.5 27.50 90.6 27.25 91.1 26.10
120 119.9 30.27 120.1 29.18 121.3 29.10 120.3 28.00
Stations 0.0 22.7 0.0 21.8 0.0 21.5 0.0 21.0
LOG DENSITY 0.706 0.720 0.723 0.721

E @ 11060 F @ 11095 G @11132


CABLE SPEED, FT/MIN
F/M RPS F/M RPS F/M RPS
30 29.4 14.60 29.5 12.16 29.3 7.13
60 60.0 17.07 60.2 14.12 61.0 9.18
90 90.8 18.80 90.7 16.00 91.4 11.11
120 119.8 20.60 121.0 17.64 121.0 13.00
Stations 0.0 13.2 0.0 10.5 0.0 5.3
LOG DENSITY 0.720 0.720 0.720
232 183 97
Analysis Step 6 (Example J58-90B)

• Go to the data analysis sheet and enter the needed data for the well:
− Chloride
− Water density
− Oil density
− Bw and Bo
− Pwf and BHFT
− Casing ID
• Most of the needed data can be acquired from the PVT of the well or form an offset
well

J58-90B PSP ANALYSIS

Chlorides = 75000 ppm Pwf = 2700 psi @ 8600' S. S Dat um L. R


Water TDS = 123750 ppm BHFT = 245 deg F
Water den = 1.03 gm/cc Csg ID = 4.03 in. 4 1/2" Liner casing
Bw = 1.025 rb/stb A' = 18.75 sq. in.
Oil den = 0.72 gm/cc Csg vel = 44.02 ft/Min
Bo = 1.30 rb/stb
Analysis Step 7 (Example J58-90B)

Enter the deviation, log density and velocities into the sheet and the rest is
calculated automatically

DOWNHOLE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS ZONAL PRODUCTION

STATION ANGLE LOG FLUID Qt Qw Qo Qo Qw Qt Qo Qw Qt PERFORATED %


DEN Yw Vs VEL. BPD BPD BPD STBPD STBPD STBPD WC% STBPD STBPD STBPD WC% INTERVALS Total

A 30.44 0.725 0.05 19.7 385 7285 325 6960 5354 317 5671 6% 208 13 221 6% (10948-10954) 3.9%
B 30.44 0.725 0.05 19.7 370 7002 312 6690 5146 304 5450 6% 92 68 160 42% (10985-10989) 2.8%
C 30.44 0.722 0.04 19.4 360 6812 242 6570 5054 236 5290 4% 345 -345 0 100% (10996-11014) 0.0%
D 30.44 0.740 0.09 21.0 355 6718 596 6121 4709 582 5291 11% 1671 152 1822 8% (11026-11055) 32.1%
E 30.44 0.745 0.11 21.4 232 4390 441 3949 3038 430 3468 0% 476 356 832 43% (11065-11084) 14.7%
F 30.44 0.718 0.03 19.1 180 3406 76 3330 2561 75 2636 0% 1221 -16 1205 -1% (11102-11126) 21.2%
G 30.44 0.730 0.06 20.1 97 1836 93 1743 1341 90 1431 0% 1341 90 1431 6% (11138-11160) 25.2%
TOTAL 5354 317 5671 6% 100%
Analysis Step 8 (Example J58-90B)

• Conclusions:
Now, looking at the data calculated and the history of the well, verify
that the results are correct and then recommend further action.
In this case, the well 90B was just drilled, producing 5700 BFPD with
traces WC.

You might also like