Scribd
Upload
57 views

Problem Identification

The document outlines several key steps and concepts in policy analysis, including: 1) Defining the problem by determining if a problem exists and if it can be addressed. 2) Identifying deficiencies in existing policies such as a lack of policies or inadequate policies. 3) Structuring policy problems by considering interdependence, subjectivity, dynamics, and classes of problems. 4) Developing problem statements by delineating boundaries, developing fact bases, and identifying goals.

Uploaded by

Nimra Azher
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
57 views

Problem Identification

The document outlines several key steps and concepts in policy analysis, including: 1) Defining the problem by determining if a problem exists and if it can be addressed. 2) Identifying deficiencies in existing policies such as a lack of policies or inadequate policies. 3) Structuring policy problems by considering interdependence, subjectivity, dynamics, and classes of problems. 4) Developing problem statements by delineating boundaries, developing fact bases, and identifying goals.

Uploaded by

Nimra Azher
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

PROBLEM

IDENTIFICATION

Dr. Ume Laila


[email protected]
Assignments
PROBLEM DEFINITION
• The first thing the policy analyst must do is to ask:

1) Does a problem exist?


2) Can anything be done about it?
3) Does the client have the power?

If the answers are no, then there is no point in doing policy analysis.
DEFICIENCIES Of POLICIES
• Three basic deficiencies of policies can be identified:
• (a) lack of policies,
• (b) inadequate policies, and
• (c) policies that exist but are not operational.

• Policies also include the behavioral aspects of society which operate as unwritten
rules within families and communities. A society’s traditional norms are not always
in written form, but such norms still function as compelling factors within social
life and have policy implications.
Phases of the Policy-Making Process:
1. Agenda Setting: Officials place problems on the governmental agenda.
2. Policy Formulation: Officials formulate policies to deal with problems.
3. Policy Adoption: Officials adopt a policy with the support of the legislative majority.
4. Policy Implementation: The policy is implemented - financial and human resources are utilized
for its implementation.
5. Policy Assessment: Policy is audited and accounted for to determine whether it’s realizing its
objective.
6. Policy Adaptation:
7. Policy Succession: Agencies determine whether the policy is still needed or not.
8. Policy Termination: If the policy is not needed anymore, it is terminated along with its
agencies.
Four Models of Policy Making:
The model I: Rational Actor
Greater Benefits + Lower Costs → High Probability of choosing this alternative

Characteristics:
• Policymakers agree on a problem
• They identify objectives
• They list all policy alternatives
• They predict all outcomes
• They determine utility/value of outcomes
• They choose the optimal alternative
Model II: Organizational Process
Opposing parties adjust their policies and agree on a middle ground.

Characteristics:
• Policy makers adjust objectives after tradeoffs.
• Policies made at the margins of status quo.
• Policies based on a limited set of alternatives.
• Changes in policies occur in small increments.
• Problems reconstructed when new information becomes available.
• Analysis and evaluation occur throughout society in a process that is fragmented and
disjointed.
• Policies involve small steps to remedy a problem rather than cure them completely with radical
steps.
MODEL III: Bureaucratic Politics

The favored policy of a bureaucratic leader depends on the agency or ministry in


which he sits.

MODEL IV: Interrupted Equilibrium

Small changes happen to policies over time.


STRUCTURING POLICY PROBLEMS
Policy Problems are:
• Interdependent: They are always related to other problems
• Subjective:
• Artificial: They are only considered problems because we say so
• Dynamic: They can change
Classes:
• Well Structured: One decision maker – a small set of alternatives - certain
outcomes - little conflict
• Moderately structured: Few decision makers - limited alternatives - uncertain
outcomes - some conflict
• Ill-structured: Many decision makers - unlimited alternatives - risky outcomes - a
lot of conflicts

• Error Type III: This is when policy analysts identify the wrong problem.
Models
• Descriptive Model: Predicts causes and consequences of policy choices.
• Normative Model: Predicts + prescribes courses of action for optimizing the
attainment of the goal.
• Verbal Models: Everyday language (words)
• Symbolic Model: Using symbols
• Procedural Model: Represents dynamic relationships among variables
Pitfalls in public policy problem definition:

1) accepting the client's definition of the problem


2) looking only for the simple and obvious
3) thinking that any and all problems need a public solution
4) confusing the need for short- versus long-term solutions
5) confusing the values of individuals versus collectivities
Public Policies

Don't Need Public Policies Do Need Public Policies


Individual problems Social problems
Widespread problems Serious problems
Relative problems Absolute problems
DEVELOPING PROBLEM STATEMENTS
In developing problem statements:
1) think about the problem
2) delineate the boundaries of the problem
3) develop a fact base
4) list goals and objectives for policy solutions
5) identify the policy envelope (key players)
6) develop preliminary costs and benefits
7) review the problem statement
BACK-OF-THE-ENVELOPE
CALCULATIONS
One of the first things a policy analyst will do is to try to get a handle on the possible
dimensions of the problem and potential solutions. The analyst may ask,
1) How many people are we talking about?
2) What is the likely cost per unit of service?
3) How much of the target population can we serve?
4) How much do we have available to spend?
5) Will more staff be needed?
6) Will this impact the budget/tax rate?
7) What are the trends in this area?
8) What will happen if we do nothing?
Scenario
• For example, try to estimate these parameters if half the children in the state are not
receiving the required immunizations before beginning school.
• Start with the number of children in the state up to age 5.
• Which immunizations are required?
• How much does each one cost? How many children could realistically be reached?
• How much do we have available to spend?
• Could we get more from the Federal government? Will more state staff be needed, or
can this be handled by the private/non-profit sector?
• Will this impact the budget/tax rate? What are the trends in this area--is the problem
increasing or decreasing over time?
• What will happen if we do nothing?
The information for doing back-of-the-envelope calculations can come from
1) reference works
2) experts
3) past studies or quick research
4) informed guesses, extrapolation, rules of thumb, estimation, parallel reasoning,
triangulation, etc.

QUICK DECISION ANALYSIS


• Quick decision analysis is a variation of the technique of making decision trees.
Decision trees are ways of diagraming a problem when the problem has more than
one solution. It is a tool to help policy analysts see the logical alternatives to a
problem.
POLITICAL ANALYSIS
• Policy analysts recognize that politics is important at all stages of the policy process,
including policy analysis. There are a number of ways to communicate about potential
political influences or factors that may impinge on the policy analysis. These techniques
attempt to allow political factors to be treated like any other important considerations
in policy analysis.
• The analyst may draw up a list of issues involved in defining the problem, and identify
a number of potential political actors who have taken positions on those issues. A table
can display the likely support or opposition of each group to each issue.

• For example, what are the issues involved in raising the age at which teens can get a
driver's license to 18? Which groups are likely to support (+) or oppose (-) problem
definitions that focus on these issues?
Groups Lower teen auto accident, Hardship for teens who work Lower insurance rates
death & injury rates or commute to school for family cars
NGOs. + ? ?
Parents/Voters + - +
Insurance + - -
Lobby
FIRST-CUT POLICY ANALYSIS
• An issue paper is a study that is conducted in preparation of making a decision on whether
or not to do a policy analysis. It describes the problem, the attendant issues, the political
groups involved, and concludes whether or not a policy analysis will be feasible.
• A first-cut policy analysis concentrates on identifying preliminary recommendations. It is
a mini-policy analysis, conducted in a short period of time, using simple techniques. It forms
the basis for a much more in-depth, complex, and thorough full-fledged policy analysis.

• Researched analysis refers to a more traditional research project, perhaps conducting a


pilot study of several policy alternatives to generate concrete data on which to base
recommendations. However, policy analysts rarely have the luxury of the time and
resources needed, nor do they often work for someone who is far enough removed from
the problem to resist pressures for a quick solution.
ALTERNATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS
MODELS
1) Quade
• a. Policy formulation
• b. Search for alternatives
• c. Forecast the future
• d. Model the impacts of the alternative
• e. Evaluate, compare, and rank the alternatives

You might also like