3.0 Evolution of Management Theory Updated
3.0 Evolution of Management Theory Updated
Lecture Objectives
To appreciate the concept of management
theory
To learn four management theories or schools
and their applications in modern management
practices
1
Overview of Theory
2
Defining Theory
3
Importance of Studying Theories
4
Why concerned with theories
5
Early Schools or thoughts of
Management
6
7
Evolution of Management Theories
8
The Challenges
9
1. Scientific School of Management
10
Job Specialization and Division of Labor
11
Job Specialization Rewards
12
Continuation of Improvement
13
F.W Taylor (1856-1915)
Scientific Management
14
Principles of Scientific Management
a) The development of a true science of management
so that the best method for performing each task
could be determined instead of unnecessary
movements
b) Scientific selection of workers so that each worker
would be given responsibility for tasks for which he
or she is best suited
c) The scientific education and development of the
worker
d) Intimate, friendly cooperation between
management and labor
15
Example: Attending the Clinic
16
Contribution of Scientific Management
17
Limitations
18
2. Classical Organizational Theory
The scientific thought then led to the development of
administrative or organizational thought.
It grew out of the need to manage complex organizations
Early attempt by Henry Fayol ( 1841-1925)
Attempted to identify principles and skills that underlie
effective management
He divided and classified business operations into six
activities all of which are closely related
19
Henry Fayol Business Classification
1. Technical: production
2. Commercial: buying and selling
3. Financial: acquiring and use of funds
4. Security: protection of resources
5. Accounting: recording of financial transactions
6. Managerial: plan, organize, lead and control
20
Fayol’s Managerial Grouping
21
Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management
1. Division of labor:
2. Authority
3. Discipline
4. Unity of Command
5. Unity of Direction
6. Subordination of Individual Interests to
common goals
7. Remuneration (compensation to be fair)
22
Fayols 14 Principles of Management
Cont
23
Contributions
24
Limitations
25
3. The Behavioral School of
Management
Emerged in part because managers found that classical
organizational approach did not achieve sufficient
production efficiency and work place harmony
Workers be treated as human beings but not as factors
of production
Leaned more towards the “people side” of their
organizations
Workers needs, feelings, attitudes, values and desires
are extremely important
26
Human Relations Movement
HR describe ways in which managers interact with their
subordinates
To create effective human relations, managers must
know why employees act as they do and what social and
psychological factors motivate them
Hawthorne Effect: the possibility that workers who
receive special attention will perform better simply
because they received that attention
The social environment of employees had a positive
influence on productivity
27
Contribution
1. Understanding of individual motivation, group
behavior, interpersonal relationship at work and the
importance of work to human beings
2. Enabled managers to become much more sensitive and
sophisticated in dealing effectively with subordinates
3. Output being determined by group norms than mere
directives
4. Continue to offer new insights in such important areas
as leadership, conflict resolution, the acquisition and
use of power, organizational change and
communication
28
Major Directions in H/Relations
29
Limitations
30
Theory X and Theory Y
31
4. The Quantitative School
32
Contributions
33
Limitations
34
Systems Approach to Management
35
Contingency Approach to Approach to
Management
36
Future of Evolution of Management
37
Tutorial Exercise
38
Case Study
Contingency Theory
This theory is a kind of behavioural theory that asserts that in general there is no effective way to systematize a corporation, to direct it and
undertake decisions. In spite of this, the best way to manage an organization depends upon its internal and external situation. It was developed by
Chandler in 1962 and Lawrence and Lorsch in 1969. In respect to this theory different contingent approaches were developed in the late 1960
(Bacher 2007). Contingency theorists suggested that previous theories like Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management had broken
down because they overlooked the environment (Walonick n.d.).
In modern time, management style and organizational structure of a firm is substantially influenced by its internal and external environment or
contingency factors. If CFC make use of this theory can effectively resolve all its troubles related with expansion and management of its operations.
An analysis of its environment will significantly help the company in its future business decisions (Organizational Theories n.d.). With an internal
environment analysis, the company can easily identify the substantial reasons of its employee dissatisfaction and level of their performance.
On the other hand, external environment will assist it in its future business planning and decisions. With the use of contingency theory, the
company will effectively become able in managing its conflicts rather than avoiding it. In addition to these advantages, this theory also has some
disadvantages like it is applicable only in a situation when organizational environment is unstable or changing (Jacques 2007). As well, this also
demands management time, money, and effort so that coordination can be attained.
Guiding Questions.
Q.1. Do internal and external environments continuously have direct impacts to the success/failure of any business operation?
Q2. Does expansion in operation expose businesses to internal and external environmental treats and opportunities?
Q3. Is it vital that businesses need to continuously involve in marketing research as to understand and be better informed of the forces involved
both external and internal?
Q4. Is it best to have a strategic plan capturing likely risks with possible mitigating measures to ensure smooth operation?
39