0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views8 pages

Rejection Analysis

This document summarizes a project to reduce scratches in a lens manufacturing process. The project leader is Suraj Sharma and involves team members Shiv Kumar and Devender. It analyzes scratch distribution between manual and machine processes. On average, manual processes contribute 65% of scratches while machine processes contribute 35%. Data is presented on the number of losses from scratches per month.

Uploaded by

Lata Suraj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views8 pages

Rejection Analysis

This document summarizes a project to reduce scratches in a lens manufacturing process. The project leader is Suraj Sharma and involves team members Shiv Kumar and Devender. It analyzes scratch distribution between manual and machine processes. On average, manual processes contribute 65% of scratches while machine processes contribute 35%. Data is presented on the number of losses from scratches per month.

Uploaded by

Lata Suraj
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Title:- Reduction in Scratch

Defect

Project Leader- Suraj Sharma


Project Members- Shiv Kumar , Devender

Project Area:- Lenslab Surfacing Area


Types of Scratch

Manual Machine
Process Wise Scratch Distribution

Process Manual Machine


Box opening
Taping
Blocking
Generation
Polish
Engraving
D- Blocking
Tape Removal
Cleaning
Average Manual Scratch Contribution

Scratch Contribution

35%

65%

Manual Scratch Machine Scratch


Number of Loss June-23
2000
1813
1800

1600

1400
1300

1200

1000

800 748

600 541

402
400
281 280
231 208 207 197 197
200 156 136 111 108
73
34 27 19 10 9 5
0
er e s er e s t
tch on lab on ng La
b
ng ke
n xi atc
h
La
b g ng lis
h
lam ng en en
s po ism ism
cra Po
w
r ati in d iti
ravi
In ha ro A P o w
c r in ev in
h a P o o b cki L L n
S Pr Pr
S e d g r c B g S r rc r lo in k o d g
rf- ng en lin
g A En
g te f- ro
n ng h ge g te ng P B Th ic ati te n
Su ro G ng in In ur ro lis an En In ro k
ng Th er an ro
W n g a nd ro b le iss e S f -W W P o ch ng k W P ee o n w W
rf- ro ish ou M as r c ter ro an r
G
e n rf-
Su rf-
W
-D f-B Su lQ In W Bl f-W U
Su
fr -W - M u r r a rf - u r
Su
rf S Su Su Fi
n
Su S
Su

Defect Wise Number of Loss


Scratch Trend
900

800 781

700

600

500

400 363

300
247

200

103
100 69
49 52 52 38 26
8 7 4 5 5 3 1
0
x t ex t x ex 9 ex ex B ex
de
x de e cu d e cu de d .4
9 d d N
A de
x
0_ d SP SV N
A
In In lu In u In In l1 In In TI In 0_ In A TI
60 60 b 9 bl 56 67 ca 6 56 0 .0 9
SV G
Y
1. 1. x 49 x 1. 1. ifo
.5 1. LU .6 5 49 6 LU
de 1. de 1 6 la 1 75
_
l1
.
67 1. 67
ut SV In In SV SV B RD SV 1. ca 1. 1.
ec 67 SV 56 nd ic fo
c 5_ N
u 1. 1.
Y u Bi 1. ifo A IO
Bl RE Ro om s B TI
N IT
SV SV G hr un
d na 70 S
SV o_ 7 0 c so 8/ LU N
ot 28 ot
o Ro Re 2
TR
A
Ph RD Ph 28 FT

Index Wise Scratch Losses – June 2023


Surf-Scratch
120

100 98
96

86
84
80 77
71
68 68 68 68
66
61 61 61 61 61
Surf-Scratch 58 59
60 57
55
53
50
47 47 48
46 46
40
40
31

21
20

0
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June June
2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023

Day Wise Surfacing Scratch


First Target Area to eliminate scratches

Cleaning Area

You might also like