0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Quicksort

Quicksort is a comparison-based sorting algorithm that runs in O(n log n) time. It works by recursively dividing the array into sub-arrays by picking a pivot element, partitioning the array such that elements less than the pivot are to the left and greater elements to the right, and then applying the same process recursively to the sub-arrays until the entire array is sorted. The example shows quicksort partitioning an array by swapping elements to place the pivot in its final sorted position.

Uploaded by

Lucky
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Quicksort

Quicksort is a comparison-based sorting algorithm that runs in O(n log n) time. It works by recursively dividing the array into sub-arrays by picking a pivot element, partitioning the array such that elements less than the pivot are to the left and greater elements to the right, and then applying the same process recursively to the sub-arrays until the entire array is sorted. The example shows quicksort partitioning an array by swapping elements to place the pivot in its final sorted position.

Uploaded by

Lucky
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 58

QUICKSORT

Sorting algorithms
◦ Insertion, selection and bubble sort have quadratic worst-case performance
◦ The faster comparison based algorithm ?
O(nlogn)

◦ Mergesort and Quicksort


Quicksort Algorithm
Given an array of n elements (e.g., integers):
◦ If array only contains one element, return
◦ Else
◦ pick one element to use as pivot.
◦ Partition elements into two sub-arrays:
◦ Elements less than or equal to pivot
◦ Elements greater than pivot
◦ Quicksort two sub-arrays
◦ Return results
Example
We are given array of n integers to sort:

40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
Pick Pivot Element
There are a number of ways to pick the pivot element. In this example,
we will use the first element in the array:

40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
Partitioning Array
Given a pivot, partition the elements of the array such
that the resulting array consists of:
1. One sub-array that contains elements > pivot
2. Another sub-array that contains elements < =pivot

The sub-arrays are stored in the original data array.

Partitioning loops through, swapping elements


below/above pivot.
pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 4 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
Partition Result

7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

<= data[pivot] > data[pivot]


Recursion: Quicksort Sub-arrays

7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

<= data[pivot] > data[pivot]


Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ What is best case running time?
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ What is best case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ What is best case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree?
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ What is best case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ What is best case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
◦ Number of accesses in partition?
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ What is best case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
◦ Number of accesses in partition? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time?
Quicksort: Worst Case
◦ Assume first element is chosen as pivot.
◦ Assume we get array that is already in order:

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

<= data[pivot] > data[pivot]


Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly
distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree?
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly
distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly
distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
◦ Number of accesses per partition?
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly
distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time?
◦ Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
◦ Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
◦ Number of accesses per partition? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly
distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time: O(n2)!!!
Quicksort Analysis
◦ Assume that keys are random, uniformly
distributed.
◦ Best case running time: O(n log2n)
◦ Worst case running time: O(n2)!!!
◦ What can we do to avoid worst case?
Improved Pivot Selection
◦ There are several ways to pick a pivot.

◦ Objective: Choose a pivot so that we will get 2


partitions of (almost) equal size.
◦ Use the first element as pivot
◦ if the input is random, ok.
◦ if the input is presorted (or in reverse order)
◦ all the elements go into S2 (or S1).
◦ this happens consistently throughout the recursive calls.
◦ results in O(N2) behavior (we analyze this case later).

◦ Choose the pivot randomly


◦ generally safe,
◦ but random number generation can be expensive and does not
reduce the running time of the algorithm.
◦ Use the median of the array (ideal pivot)
◦ The N/2 th largest element
◦ Partitioning always cuts the array into roughly half
◦ An optimal quick sort (O(N log N))
◦ However, hard to find the exact median

You might also like