IC Engine Chapter-2
IC Engine Chapter-2
contained in gas
2–3 isentropic expansion to TC
entropy
3–4 isothermal heat rejection (in contact
with TC) 4 1
4–1 isentropic compression to TH
(isentropic adiabatic+quasistatic) TC TH T
CARNOT CYCLE CONT.
The areas under the process curves on
◦ the P-v diagram represent the work done for closed systems.
(W net)
◦ T-s diagram represent the heat transfer for the processes.
(Q net)
◦ W net = Qnet b/c dU 0 TdS PdV
W Q1 2 Q3 4 TH ( S 2 S 1 ) TL ( S 3 S 4 )
Carnot net
Qin Q1 2 TH ( S 2 S 1 )
TH TL T
Carnot 1 L
TH TH
CARNOT CYCLE CONT.
We often use the Carnot efficiency as a means to think
about ways to improve the cycle efficiency of other cycles.
One of the observations about the efficiency of both ideal
and actual cycles comes from the Carnot efficiency:
Thermal efficiency increases
◦ with an increase in the average temperature at which heat is supplied
to the system or
◦ with a decrease in the average temperature at which heat is rejected
heat addition
3-4 Isentropic
expansion
4-1 Constant volume
heat rejection
OTTO CYCLE CONT.
Thermal Efficiency of the Otto cycle
Qnet , 23 U 23
Thus, for constant specific heats,
Qnet , 23 Qin mCv (T3 T2 )
OTTO CYCLE CONT.
Similarly apply first law closed system to process 4-1, V = constant.
Qnet , 41 U 41
Qnet , 41 Qout mCv (T1 T4 )
Qout mCv (T1 T4 ) mCv (T4 T1 )
T2 T3
T1 T4
or
T4 T3
T1 T2
T2 T3 T
T2 T
T3
2 3
T1
T4
T1 T4 or T1 T4
or
T
T
4
1
or
T4
T
T
3
T3
Is this the same as the Carnot
T4
T1
T3
T2
T1 T2
cycle efficiency?
(T4 T1 )
th , Otto 1
(T3 T2 )
T1
T1 (T4 / T1 1) th , Otto 1
1 T2
T2 (T3 / T2 1)
OTTO CYCLE CONT.
Since process 1-2 is isentropic,
1 3
s
OTTO CYCLE CONT.
Spark ignition engine compression ratio limited by
◦ T3 (Auto ignition)
◦ P3 (material strength),
For r = 8 the efficiency is 56%
Cylinder temperatures vary between 300K and 2000K so
1.2 < k < 1.4
◦ k = 1.3 most representative
.
OTTO CYCLE CONT.
Factors Affecting Work per Cycle
The net cycle work of an engine can be increased by
either:
3’
◦ i) Increasing the r (1’2) P ’
◦ ii) Increase Qin (23”) 3 (ii)
4’
Qin ’
Wcycle 4
WcycleQin r 4
imep th 2 (i) ’
V1 V2 V1 r 1
1
V2 1
V1 V2 V1
1
V1 ’
V2 V1
R0 T1 Q2 3
p1m
1
V1 1 V1 M MR0T1
r
m p1 mep
1
1
r
OTTO CYCLE CONT.
Non-dimensionalizing mep with p1 we get
R0
mep 1 Q m
cv 1
p1 1 R0 T1 m
1
r
Qout
th , Diesel 1
Qin
mCv (T4 T1 )
1
mC p (T3 T2 )
Diesel Cycle Cont.
Cv (T4 T1 )
th , Diesel 1
C p (T3 T2 )
1 T1 (T4 / T1 1)
1
k T2 (T3 / T2 1)
PV PV
3 3
2 2 where P3 P2
What is T3/T2 ?
T3 T2
T3 V3
rc
T2 V2
Since the fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, the cutoff ratio can be
related to the number of degrees that the crank rotated during the fuel
injection into the cylinder.
Diesel Cycle Cont.
PV PV
4 4
1 1 where V4 V1
T4 T1
What is T4/T1 ?
T4 P4
T1 P1
Recall processes 1-2 and 3-4 are isentropic, so
PV PV
1 1
k
2 2
k
and PV PV 4 4
k
3 3
k
Since V4 = V1 and P3 = P2, we divide the second equation by the first equation
and obtain
Diesel Cycle Cont.
Therefore, The Thermal Efficiency is
1 T1 ( T4 / T1 1)
th , Diesel 1
k T2 ( T3 / T2 1)
1 T1 r 1 k
Diesel
1 k 1
1 1 rck 1
1
c
k T2 ( rc 1) const cV r k rc 1
1 rck 1
1
r k 1 k ( rc 1)
Note the term in the square bracket is always larger than unity so for the
same compression ratio, r, the Diesel cycle has a lower thermal efficienc
than the Otto cycle
k 1 Qin 1
rc 1 k 1
k P1V1 r Typical CI Engin
15 < r < 20
as Qin 0, rc=v3/v21
The cut-off ratio is not a natural choice for the independent variable
more suitable parameter is the heat input, the two are related by:
Diesel Cycle Cont.
We can write the mep formula for the diesel cycle like that for the
Otto cycle in terms of the η, Q’, γ, cv and T1:
mep Q 1
p1 cvT1 1
1 r 1
1 2 Isentropic compression
2 3 Constant volume heat addition
3 4 Constant pressure heat addition
4 5 Isentropic expansion
5 1 Constant volume heat rejection
mep
rp r
rc 1 r
rp 1 r rp c 1
r
p1 r 1 1
the expression for mep/p3
mep mep p1
p3 p1 p3
Dual Cycle Cont.
p3 1
rp
p1 r
We can obtain an expression for rc in terms of Q’ and rp and
other known quantities as follows:
1 Q 1
rc 1
cvT1r 1 rp
Dual Cycle Cont.
We can also obtain an expression for rp in terms of Q’ and rc and other
known quantities as follows:
Q
c T r 1 1
rp v 1
1 rc
Comparison of Otto, Diesel & Dual Cycles
The important variable factors which are used as the basis for
comparison of the cycles are
◦ compression ratio,
◦ peak pressure,
◦ heat addition,
◦ heat rejection and
◦ the net work
a comparison of these three cycles is made for the
◦ same compression ratio,
◦ same heat addition,
◦ constant maximum pressure and temperature,
◦ same heat rejection and net work output
Comparison of Otto, Diesel & Dual Cycles Cont.
T-s diagram
Diesel o rk
oowrk
1000
tt
Ol w
i e s e
800
D
600
400
Otto heat
Diesel input
heat input
200
0
-200 0 200 400 600 800
Entropy (J/kg-K)
Otto vs. Diesel cycle (animation)
Otto clearly has higher th - every Carnot strip has same TL for both cycles, but every Otto
strip has higher TH
Unlike Otto cycle, for Diesel cannot be determined by inspection of the T - s diagram since
Comparison of Otto, Diesel & Dual Cycles Cont.
heat supplied in the Otto cycle is more than that of the Diesel
cycle. Hence, it is evident that, the efficiency of the Otto cycle is
greater
Comparison of Otto, Diesel & Dual Cycles Cont.
Diesel Otto
Comparison of Otto, Diesel & Dual Cycles Cont.
Diesel Otto
the heat rejection for Otto cycle is more than the heat rejected in Diesel
cycle, Hence Diesel cycle is more efficient than Otto cycle
Comparison of Otto, Diesel & Dual Cycles Cont.
P3 T3 2246.8
3.65
P2 T2 615
P3 3.65 12.3 10 5 44.8 10 5 N 2 44.8 bar
m
Solution
Work output
= Area of the p-v diagram
=Area under (3-4) – Area under (2-1)
P V P4V4 P2V2 P1V1 RT3 RT4 RT2 RT1
3 3
1 1 1 1
R
T3 T4 T2 T1
1
R C P CV 1.004 0.717 0.287 kJ
kg K
1
T3 V3
r 1 6 0.4 2.048
T4 V4
T 2246.8
T4 3 1097.1 K
2.048 2.048
Solution
Work output/kg
0.287
2246.8 1097.1 615 300
0 .4
598.9 kJ
Otto 1 1
1
1 1 0.4 0.5116
r 6
51.16 %
Efficiency 0.287
2246.8 1097.1 615 300
0.4
598.9 kJ
Otto 1 1
1
1 1 0.4 0.5116
r 6
51.16 %
Example-2
Determine the ideal efficiency of the diesel engine
having a cylinder with bore 250 mm, stroke 375 mm
and a clearance volume of 1500 cc, with fuel cut-off
occurring at 5 % of the the stroke. Assume γ=1.4 for air
Given Data
◦ Bore Dia b=250 mm
◦ Stroke length s=375 mm
◦ Clearance Volume Vc=1500 cc
60.52 %
Solution
To determine efficiency
V3
Cut off ratio rc
V
2
Cut off Volume V3 V 2 0.05V s
0.05 12.27 Vc
0.6135Vc
V2 Vc
V3 Vc 0.6135(Vc ) 1.6135(Vc )
V3 1.6135Vc
rc
V
Vc
1.6135
2
1 rc 1 1 1.61351.4 1
Diesel 1 1 1
rc 1 1.4 1.6135 1
0.4
r 13.27
0.60502
60.52 %
Fuel-Air Cycle
◦ The theoretical cycle based on the actual
properties of the cylinder contents is called the
fuel–air cycle.
The fuel–air cycle take into consideration the
following:
1. The actual composition of the cylinder contents.
2. The variation in the specific heat of the gases in the
cylinder.
3. The dissociation effect.
4. The variation in the number of moles present in the
cylinder as the pressure and temperature change.
5. Compression & expansion processes are
frictionless
6. No chemical changes in either fuel or air prior to
combustion.
7. Combustion takes place instantaneously at top
dead center.
8. All processes are adiabatic.
9. The fuel is mixed well with air.
10. Subsequent to combustion, the change is
always in chemical equilibrium.
Composition of Cylinder Gases
Composition of Cylinder Gases Cont.
Variable Specific Heats
Variable Specific Heats Cont.
Loss Due to Variable Specific Heats
Loss Due to Variable Specific Heats Cont.
For the expansion Process
Comparison of Air-Standard & Fuel-Air cycles
Comparison of Air-Standard & Fuel-Air cycles Cont.
Comparison of Air-Standard & Fuel-Air cycles Cont.
Effect of Operating variables
Effect of Compression Ratio
Effect of Compression Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Effect of Fuel-Air Ratio
Actual Engine cycle
Introduction
◦ Air-Standard Cycle Analys is gives an estimate
of engine performance which is much greater
than the actual performance, For Example for SI
The actual cycles for IC engines differ from the
fuel-air cycles and air-standard cycles in many
respects.
The actual cycle efficiency is much lower than the
air-standard efficiency due to various losses
occurring in the actual engine operation.
The major losses are due to:
◦ Variation of specific heats with temperature
◦ Dissociation of the combustion products
◦ Progressive combustion
◦ Incomplete combustion of fuel
◦ Heat transfer into the walls of the combustion chamber
◦ Blowdown at the end of the exhaust process
◦ Gas exchange process
Comparison Of Air-standard And Actual Cycles
Comparison Of Fuel-Air Cycle And Actual Cycles
The Major Loss of Actual Cycle
Time Loss Factor
Time Loss Factor
End of Chapter-two