CAP Vs SOC
CAP Vs SOC
Capitalism Socialism
• unfair and inefficient • socialist economic and
distribution of wealth and political models are
power; inefficient or incompatible
• irrational in that production and
with civil liberties.
direction of the economy is
unplanned, creating many • transmit information about
inconsistencies and internal prices and productive
contradictions. quotas due to the lack of a
• requires continual economic price mechanism, and as a
growth, and will inevitably result it could not make
deplete the finite natural rational economic decisions.
resources of the earth
EVALUATING ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
Relationship Between Government and
Economic System
• The economic system can operate only in a broader social
system of reasonable security and stability. Government has
traditionally provided security and stability for the people.
• Over time, at least five other needs arose, which the
government sought to meet:
– Development of a Welfare Safety Net
– Provision of Common Goods
– Control of Economic Cycles
– Correction of Unfair Tendencies and of Market Failures Within the
Free-Enterprise System
– Taxation
Economic Systems and Justice
• We cannot be moral and choose or espouse an inherently
immoral economic system.
• But there is no moral imperative mandating that we choose one
rather than another.
• Distributive justice—that is, justice in the social allocation of
benefits and burdens—is frequently thought to be the most
important moral component of any economic system.
• In the capitalist system, justice demands equality of
opportunity; it does not demand equality of results.
• Justice in a socialist system consists not only in equality of
opportunity, although it also allows proportionality of
differential rewards. It guarantees that all receive some reward,
but it tends to limit the amount of the reward anyone may get.
Critique
• Socialism is most often criticized for its
provision of social services programs requiring
high taxes that may decelerate economic
growth.
• Capitalism is most often criticized for its
tendency to allow income inequality and
stratification of socio-economic classes.
The Marxist Critique
(Exploitation of the Workforce)
• Capitalism is based on exploitation of the worker
—that is, not paying him what he truly deserves.
• The basis for the claim of necessary exploitation is
Marx’s labor theory of value.
– argues that the economic value of a good or service is
determined by the total amount of "socially necessary
labor" required to produce it.
– quantification of past labor,
– labor needed to create the tools (capital) that might
be used in producing a commodity
The Marxist Critique
(Alienation of the People)
• Capitalism is inherently immoral because it
alienates human beings.
• It does not treat them as ends in themselves;
it separates them into antagonistic camps and
sets one against another; it stultifies the
workers; it involves domination of some by
others; and it produces other negative effects
on all those who live within the system.
The Marxist Critique
(Vested Interests)
• Capitalism defends the vested interests of the
few and prevents the vast productive forces of
society from truly serving the masses.
• The natural tendency of the productive
process is toward social ownership instead of
private ownership of the means of production.
Non-Marxist Moral Critiques
• There are 4 non-Marxist criticisms :
• The libertarian view is based on the notion of the sanctity of private property.
Private property belongs to an individual. If he has worked for it, he deserves to
keep what he has earned. If he has taken risks, if he has been lucky, if he has
worked especially hard, and if he has been innovative, the market will reward him.
• The libertarian view has, therefore, a moral thrust. It champions liberty as a moral
virtue worthy of human beings. It faults government as acting immorally through
taxation, welfare, and many of its other programs.
Non-Socialist Alternatives to Capitalism
Workers’ Democracy