IFRS Chapter 2 Lecture
IFRS Chapter 2 Lecture
Accounting
(ACFN– 611)
03/14/24
Chapter 2
International Convergence of Financial
Reporting and International Financial reporting
Standards ( IFRS)
03/14/24
Chapter objectives
By the end to this chapter you are able to
understand the following.
1. Harmonization and convergence
2. Proposed changes to IASB Frame work by IASB
and FASB
3. International Financial Reporting standards issued
by IASB: IAS 1 through 41 and IFRS 1 through 13
4. IFRS for SME issue by IASB
03/14/24
2.1. Harmonization and convergence
Harmonization
What is harmonization?
Harmonization -- the process of increasing
the
level of agreement in accounting standards
and
practices between countries.
Learning Objective 1
3-4
Harmonization
The two “levels” of Harmonization
Harmonization in accounting standards,
which is increased agreement in
accounting rules.
Harmonization in practice, which is
increased agreement in actual accounting
practices.
Harmonization in standards may or may
not result in harmonization in practice.
Learning Objective 1
3-5
Harmonization
Harmonization
Is different from Standardization.
Harmonization allows for different
standards in different countries as long as
there are not logical conflicts.
Standardization involves using the same
standards in different countries.
Learning Objective 1
3-6
Harmonization: The Pros and
Cons
Pros:
Expedite the integration of global capital
markets and make easier the cross-listing of
securities.
Facilitate international mergers and
acquisitions.
Reduce investor uncertainty and the cost of
capital.
Reduce financial reporting costs.
Allow for easy adoption of high-quality
standards by developing countries.
Learning Objective 2
3-7
Harmonization: The Pros and
Cons
Cons:
Significant differences in standards currently
exist.
The political cost of eliminating differences.
Overcoming “Nationalism” and traditions.
Perhaps it will not provide significant
benefits.
Will cause “Standards Overload” for some
firms.
Diverse standards for diverse places is
acceptable.
Learning Objective 2
3-8
Convergence and Arguments for Convergence
Convergence
Enforcement of single set of accepted standards by several regulatory bodies
Facilitate better comparability of financial statements
Easier evaluation of companies
Facilitate international mergers and acquisitions
Reduce financial reporting costs
Cost-listing would allow access to less expensive capital
Reduce investor uncertainty and the cost of capital
Reduce cost of preparing worldwide consolidated financial statements
Simplify auditing
Easy transfer of accounting staff internationally
3-9
Arguments for Convergence
Raise the quality level of accounting practices
internationally
Increase credibility of financial information
Enable developing countries to adopt a ready-made set of
high-quality standards with minimum cost and effort
3-10
Arguments against Convergence
Significant differences in existing standards
Enormous political cost of eliminating differences
Nationalism and traditions
Arriving at universally accepted principles is difficult
Need for common standards is not universally accepted
Well-developed global capital market exists already
May cause standards overload
Differences in accounting across countries might be
necessary
3-11
Harmonization Efforts
Several organizations were involved at global and
regional levels
International Organization of Securities Commissions
(IOSCO)
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)
European Union (EU)
International Forum on Accountancy Development (IFAD)
International Accounting Standards Committee(IASC)
International Accounting Standard Board (IASB)
3-12
International Organization of Securities
Commissions (IOSCO)
Established in 1974
Initially limited its membership to regulatory agencies in
America
Opened membership to agencies in other parts of the world
in 1986
Aims at ensuring a better regulation of markets on both
domestic and international levels
Works to facilitate cross-border securities offering and
listings by multinational issuers
Advocates the adoption of a set of high-quality accounting
standards
3-13
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)
Established in October1977 at 11th World Congress of
Accountants in Munich
Promotes adherence to high-quality professional
standards of auditing, ethics, education, and training
Launched International Forum on Accountancy
Development (IFAD) to
Enhance the accounting profession in emerging nations
Promote transparent financial reporting
Established the Forum of Firms with an aim of
Protecting the interests of cross-border investors
Promoting international flows of capital
3-14
European Union (EU)
Founded in March 1957 with the signing of the Treaty of
Rome by six European nations
Issued two directives aimed at harmonizing accounting
Fourth Directive: Dealt with valuation rules, disclosure
requirements, and the format of financial statements
Established the true and fair view principle
Provided considerable flexibility
Allowed countries to choose from among acceptable alternatives
Opened the door for noncomparability in financial statements
Seventh Directive: Dealt with consolidated financial
statements
3-15
European Union (EU)
Directives helped reduce differences in financial
statements
Complete comparability was not achieved
European Commission decided not to issue additional
accounting directives
Associated itself with efforts undertaken by the IASC toward
a broader international harmonization of accounting
standards
3-16
International Forum on Accountancy
Development (IFAD)
Mission was to improve the market security and
transparency, and financial stability on a global basis
Assists in defining expectations from accountancy
profession
Encourages governments to focus on the needs of
developing economies in transition
Harness funds and expertise to build accounting and
auditing capacity in developing countries
3-17
International Accounting Standards Committee
(IASC)
Established in 1973 by leading professional accounting
bodies in 10 countries
Broad objective of formulating international accounting
standards
Harmonization efforts evolved in three mail phases
Lowest-common-denominator approach
Issuance of 26 generic International Accounting Standards
Comparability project
Publication of Framework for the Preparation and Presentation
of Financial Statements
Comparability of Financial Statements Project
IOSCO agreement
3-18
International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB)
Replaced IASC in 2001
IFRS Foundation appoints board of 16 members
13 full and 3 part-time
Board approves standards, exposure drafts, and
interpretations
Shift in emphasis from harmonization to global standard-
setting or convergence
Main aim is to develop a set of high-quality financial
reporting standards for global use
3-19
EXHIBIT 3.2—The Structure of the IASB
3-20
International Accounting Standard-setting
Other factors leading to noncomparable accounting
numbers despite similar accounting standards
Quality of audits
Enforcement mechanisms
Culture
legal requirements
Socioeconomic and political systems
International convergence of accounting standards refers
to both a goal and the process adopted to achieve it
3-21
Principles-Based Approach to International
Financial Reporting Standards
IASB follows a principles-based approach to standard setting
vs a rules-based approach
Standards establish general principles for recognition,
measurements, and reporting requirements for transactions
Limits guidance and encourages professional judgment in
applying general principles to entities or industries
A principles-based accounting system --- such as GAAP ---
provides basic guidelines for accountants to follow. The basic ones
found in GAAP include regularity, consistency, sincerity,
prudence, continuity, periodicity and good faith, among others that
may apply to a company's operations. In some cases, the principles
provide suggestions on how to apply GAAP to complex financial
transactions. This leads to different reporting for certain
transactions, making it possible for two companies to handle a
similar transaction differently.
3-22
Rules-based approach
Rules-based accounting systems provide specific dictates
for reporting financial information. Accountants must
follow these rules or face penalties for noncompliance.
International countries may have a rules-based system.
Rules detail how a company should prepare and report
financial transactions. Accountants must learn and follow
these rules, taking a company's financial information and
forcing it to meet the rules-based system.
IASB Framework
Created to develop accounting standards systematically
Framework for Preparation and Presentation of Financial
Statement adopted by IASB in 2001 from IASC
Scope of Framework
Objective of financial statements and underlying
assumptions
Qualitative characteristics that affect the usefulness of
financial statements
Definition, recognition, and measurement of the financial
statements elements
Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
3-24
Qualitative Characteristics of Financial
Statements
Understandability: Understandable to people with
reasonable financial knowledge
Relevance: Useful for making predictions and confirming
existing expectations
Affected by nature and materiality of information
Reliability: Neutral and represents faithfully what it
purports to
Reflecting items based on economic substance rather than
their legal form
Comparabilty
3-25
2.2. Proposed Changes to existing frameworks
by IASB and FASB
IASB and FASB will work on existing frameworks to
provide basis for developing future standards by boards
Phases of project
Objectives and qualitative characteristics
Elements and recognition
Measurement
Reporting entity
Presentation and disclosure
Purpose and status
Application to not-for-profits
Finalization
3-26
Elements of Financial Statements
Definition
Assets, liabilities, and other financial statement elements are
defined
Recognition
Guidelines as to when to recognize revenues and expenses
Measurement
Various bases are allowed: historical cost, current cost,
realizable value, and present value
3-27
The Norwalk Agreement
Norwalk Agreement refers to a Memorandum of
Understanding signed in September 2002 between the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the US
standard setter, and the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB). The agreement is so called as it was reached in
Norwalk. Proposed Changes as per the discussion paper
published jointly by two boards:
Decision-useful objective encompassing information relevant to
assessing stewardship
Stakeholder approach (vs. U.S. framework of shareholder
approach) — users other than capital providers explicitly
acknowledged
Emphasis on principle and guidance development for fair value
measurements in IFRS
3-28
International Convergence Issues
The complicated nature of standards such as financial instruments
and fair value accounting (fair value is a rational and unbiased
estimate of the potential market price of a good, service, or asset. It
takes into account such objective factors as:
acquisition/production/distribution costs, replacement costs, or costs
of close substitutes actual utility at a given level of development of
social productive capability
3-29
IASB/FASB Convergence
The Norwalk Agreement reached in 2002 between the
IASB and FASB pledged
For compatible financial reporting standards
Proper coordination of work program to maintain
compatibility
3-30
IASB/FASB Convergence
IASB’s and FASB’s key initiatives in the Norwalk Agreement
Joint projects – boards work jointly to address issues (e.g., revenue
recognition)
Short-term convergence –remove differences between IFRS and
U.S. GAAP for issues where convergence is deemed most likely
IASB liaison – IASB member in residence at FASB
Monitoring IASB projects – FASB monitors IASB projects of
most interest
Convergence research project – identification of all major
differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP
Convergence potential – FASB assesses agenda items for possible
cooperation with IASB
3-31
IASB/FASB Convergence
Following global financial crisis both groups formed
Financial Crisis Advisory Group (FCAG)
July 2009 FCAG report addresses:
Effective financial reporting
Limitations of financial reporting
Convergence of accounting standards
Standard-setting independence and accountability
3-32
Anglo-Saxon Accounting
Accounting systems prevalent in English-speaking
countries including U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia and
New Zealand
Fundamental features:
Micro orientation (firm level) with emphasis on professional
rules and self-regulation
Investor orientation
Primary aim is efficient operation of capital markets
Very transparent
Less emphasis on prudence and measurement of taxable
income or distributable income
3-33
Types of Differences Between IFRS and U.S.
GAAP
Definition differences
Recognition differences
Measurement differences
Alternatives
Lack of requirements or guidance
Presentation differences
Disclosure differences
4-34
IFRS and U.S. GAAP
IFRS more flexible in many cases
Choice between alternative treatments in accounting
IFRS generally have less bright-line guidance
More judgment is required in applying IFRS
IFRS is a principles-based accounting system:
whereas U.S. GAAP is a rules-based system
Rules-based accounting systems provide specific dictates for
reporting financial information. Accountants must follow these
rules or face penalties for noncompliance. International countries
may have a rules-based system. Rules detail how a company
should prepare and report financial transactions. Accountants must
learn and follow these rules, taking a company's financial
information and forcing it to meet the rules-based system.
4-35
2.3. International Financial Reporting
standards issued by IASB: IAS 1
through 41 and IFRS 1 through 13
2.3.1. International Financial Reporting
standards issued by IASB: IAS 1
through 41
2.3.2. IFRS 1 through 13
IAS1.Presentation of Financial
Statements
Business entity is required to present a complete set of financial
statements at least annually, with comparative amounts for the
preceding year (including comparative amounts in the notes)
A complete set of financial statements comprises:
• Financial Position
• Financial Performance
• Changes in Equity
• Cash flow Statement
• Local government
• Notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting
policies
• Explicit and unreserved statement of such compliance in
the notes.
43
Thursday, March 14, 2024
IAS 16. Property, Plant and Equipment
for recognizing property, plant and equipment as assets, measuring their carrying amounts,
and measuring the depreciation charges and impairment losses to be recognized in relation to
their cost.
Property, plant and equipment are tangible items that:
are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for
administrative purposes; and
are expected to be used during more than one period.
The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized as an asset if, and only if:
it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the entity; and
the cost of the item can be measured reliably.
An item of property, plant and equipment that qualifies for recognition as an asset is initially
measured at its cost. Cost includes:
its purchase price, including import duties and non-refundable purchase taxes, after deducting
trade discounts and rebates;
costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location
estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item
Still continues………………..,
an expense when the entity consumes the economic benefit arising from the service
provided by an employee in exchange for employee benefits.
a statement that shows the net assets available for benefits; the actuarial present
value of promised retirement benefits, distinguishing between vested benefits and
non-vested benefits; and the resulting excess or deficit; or
a statement of net assets available for benefits including either a note disclosing the
actuarial present value of promised vested and non-vested retirement benefits or a
reference to this information in an accompanying actuarial report.
A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of
the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.
For presentation, financial instruments are classified into financial assets, financial
liabilities and equity instruments.
it is probable that there will be future economic benefits from the asset;
and
the cost of the asset can be reliably measured.
not owner-occupied;
80
IFRS 16 lease
IFRS 16 introduces a single lessee accounting model and requires a
lessee to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more
than 12 months, unless the underlying asset is of low value. A lessee is
required to recognize a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the
underlying leased asset and a lease liability representing its obligation to
make lease payments.
A lessee measures right-of-use assets similarly to other non-financial
assets (such as property, plant and equipment) and lease liabilities
similarly to other financial liabilities. As a consequence, a lessee
recognizes depreciation of the right-of-use asset and interest on the lease
liability. The depreciation would usually be on a straight-line basis.
In the statement of cash flows, a lessee separates the total amount of cash
paid into principal (presented within financing activities) and interest
(presented within either operating or financing activities) in accordance
with IAS 7.