0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views7 pages

Easements Profit A Prendre

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views7 pages

Easements Profit A Prendre

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

EASEMENTS & PROFIT A

PRENDRE
Easements
Nature of an easement

 Right over another person’s land

 Eg right of way and right of light


 Right to use a washing line on the neighbour’s land
 (Drewell v Towler (1832) B & Ad. 735
 Right to park a car on another person’s land
 Patel v W.H. Smith (Eziot) Ltd (1987) 1 W.L.R. 853 at 859 Balcombe L.J.
MOST IMPORTANT CASE

 Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131


 Where for the first time, the right of householders to walk freely in a nearby park was
recognised as satisfying the requirements to qualify as an easement

 Once created the easement will run automatically with the dominant land and can be
enjoyed by any occupier of the land
 An easement exists to benefit the land as such it is necessary but not sufficient that the
person claiming the right must own the land
 The right must benefit the owner in that capacity
 There are two issues to consider:
 (i) mutual proximity of the two plots
 (ii) the nature of the advantage claimed
 Proximity
 The two plots of land must be reasonably close to each other but need not be physically
next to each other.
 Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131
 Nature of the claim
 The question is whether the right claimed has some natural connection with the estate or
whether it confers a personal advantage for the current owner of the estate
 This is a question of fact and the test to determine this matter is whether the right makes
the occupation or use of the dominant tenement more convenient.
 if dominant tenement is used for business purposes
 Hill v Tupper[1863] 2H & C 121
Dominant and servient tenement

 For a right to exist, the right must affect two plots of land
 In the right of way the person claiming the right does so in his capacity as owner of a
tenement over another plot of land.
 Definition of tenement
 An estate or holding of land
 The land that enjoys the benefit of the right = dominant tenement
 The land over which the right is exercised is = servient tenement
 An easement cannot exist in gross
 London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail parks Ltd [1994] 1W.L.R 31 AT
36 P. Gibson L.J
Easements – Servient vs. Dominant

Servient Tenement

 Land burdened by the easement

 Land which “suffers” because of the easement

Dominant Tenement

 Land (if any) benefited by the easement

 Land which is made “more valuable” because of the easement

You might also like