Airport Terminal

Renovation

Project Management
Section 4
Team: 4
Presented By-
Akash Gotra
Madhav Mistry
Nishigandha Jadhav
Rashmeet Chahal
 Airport Terminal
Renovation:

• Project overview
• Project’s necessity
• Research
• Impact of not having the
project

8/16/2023 Sample Footer Text 2

By Rashmeet Chahal
PROJECT SCOPE STATEMENT

By Madhav Mistry
PROJECT SCOPE STATEMENT

By Madhav Mistry
PROJECT SCOPE STATEMENT

By Madhav Mistry
WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE:
By deliverables

By Madhav Mistry
By Madhav Mistry
GANTT CHART

By Madhav Mistry
GANTT CHART

By Madhav Mistry
 Budget
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Budget
Airport terminal renovation Implementation and Installation Preparatory Work Identify Installation Zones $120,000

Prepare Installation Areas $280,000

Secure Necessary Permits $150,000

Renovation Installation Green Installation $350,000

Install Smart bench Shuttle systems $600,000

Kiosks and Display Screens $250,000

Implementation and Installation Total $17,50,000

Monitoring and Maintenance Performance Monitoring Analyze Wayfinding Effectiveness $50,000

Track User Feedback and Complaints $50,000

Routine Maintenance Regular Cleaning and Upkeep $120,000

Update Maps and Information as Needed $80,000

Monitoring and Maintenance Total $300,000

Planning and Design Conceptualization Define Signage Types and Locations $200,000

Design Digital Display Concepts $170,000

Select Color Schemes and Typography $120,000

User Experience Design Create Wireframes and Mockups $140,000

Design Information Hierarchy $170,000

Develop User Personas $200,000

Planning and Design Total $10,00,000

Procurement and Production Printing and Fabrication Assemble and Test Digital Displays $120,000
By Nishigandha Jadhav
 Role: Senior leader overseeing airport operations and passenger experience.
COO (Chief Power: High
Operations Interest: High
Officer) Requirements: Smooth execution, minimal disruption, enhanced experience.
Concerns: Operational downtime, communication, revenue impact.
Role: Manages airport infrastructure.
Facilities Power: Moderate
Manager Interest: High
Requirements: Efficient installation, compliance, maintenance.
Concerns: Terminal operations, maintenance coordination, durability.

Stakeholder
Role: Designs user-friendly solutions.
UX Power: Low to Moderate
Designer Interest: High

Assessment Requirements: Effective signage, user testing, design consistency.

Concerns: Design integrity, implementation alignment.
Role: Handles communication and promotion.
Marketing Power: Low to Moderate
Manager Interest: Moderate
Requirements: Informing passengers, promoting experience, events.
Concerns: Accurate messaging, passenger expectations, timing.
Role: Ensures security measures are maintained.
Security Power: Moderate
Manager Interest: Moderate
Requirements: Uninterrupted security, sensitive information.
Concerns: Security, vulnerabilities, passenger perception.

By Nishigandha Jadhav
Communication Plan

• Document Name: Project

progress Report.
• Document Owner: Project
Manager.
• Medium: Pdf Format Via Email.
Communication
Plan:

• Frequency: Weekly
• Stakeholder Receiving
Documents: Airport
Management Team.
• Stakeholder’s Duties: Review
the weekly progress and provide
insights into preferences.
 Status:
Risk 1. Construction or Work Delays: Open
Risk 2. Design and Structure Changes: In-Progress

Risk & Mitigation Strategies:

Description Probability Impact Score Response Strategy Contingency Plan

Uncertain issues Our team will Giving priority to

during the work responsively analyze critical tasks in the first
Medium High 3 X 4=12
operations lead to the construction place, extending work
delays in achieving the (3 On a scale of 5) (4 On a scale of 5) progress. Regular hours, or revising
project milestones. checks will allow us to project schedules as
capture all the issues per requirements.
beforehand.

Description Probability Impact Score Response Strategy Contingency Plan

Design changes from Our team will actively Setting limits on

Stakeholders between collaborate with design changes at
the workings may stakeholders in the certain points of the
impact the timeline High Medium 4 X 3=12 design process by project beforehand to
and increase the following the avoid changes
project's costs. (4 On a scale of 5) (3 On a scale of 5) recommendations between the workings
given. or restructuring the
scope statement on
the acceptable scale.
 Status:
Risk 3. Increase in Allocated Budget Open
Risk 4. Stakeholder’s Unacceptance Closed

Description Probability Impact Score Response Strategy Contingency Plan

Unplanned Expenses Our team will actively Utilizing a

may be subject to analyze all the contingency budget
overspending on expenses and make that was kept tackling
allocated funds. Medium High 3 X 4=12 use of the cost the unexpected costs.
controls and will
(3 on a scale of 5) (4 On a scale of 5) regularly compare the
expenditure to be on
budget and avoid
budget overruns.

Description Probability Impact Score Response Strategy Contingency Plan

Some of the The occurrence of this As the impact is very

stakeholders will risk is very low still if high and the goal is to
disagree with the something happens have less resistance
changes and new Low Medium 1 X 3=3 the team will make from stakeholders
processes which sure to have a team will make
might result in work (1 On a scale of 5) (3 On a scale of 5) strategy for having stakeholders aware of
delays or arguments. early engagement the concerns that may
and clear arise beforehand.
communication with
stakeholders.
 Status:
Risk 5. Supply Chain Interruptions In-progress

Description Probability Impact Score Response Strategy Contingency Plan

Problems of not getting Our Team will identify To get the material
the required raw beforehand which required from the
materials and or overall materials and alternate supplier or
supply chain Medium High 3 X 4=12 equipment are required adjust the project
interruptions could throughout the whole schedule on accepted
impact the project’s (3 on a scale of 5) (4 on a scale of project and make them parameters.
growth. 5) available by maintaining
a good relationship with
the supplier.
Key Findings Lessons

• User centric design matters • Clear contact channels

• Technology integration • Flexibility
• Workers training and support • Continuous feedback loop

Key takeaway messages

• Passenger –centric approach
• Technology as an enabler
• Collaboration and staff training.
Contribution

Intro and conclusion: Rashmeet Chahal

Budget, Stakeholder Assessment : Nishigandha Jadhav

Risk and Mitigation strategies: Akash Gotra

Project statement, WBS, Gantt: Madhav Mistry